Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials for

Similar documents
Extended groups and representation theory

David Vogan. Wilfried Schmid Birthday Conference, May 2013

Langlands parameters and finite-dimensional representations

David Vogan. MIT Lie groups seminar 9/24/14

David Vogan. 30th Winter School of Geometry and Physics

Unitary representations of reductive groups

David Vogan. 40th Anniversary Midwest Representation Theory Conference. In honor of the 65th birthday of Rebecca Herb and in memory of Paul Sally, Jr.

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Critical level representations of affine Kac Moody algebras

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

An overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations

Endoscopy and Shimura Varieties

Representations Are Everywhere

Computing the Unitary Dual. Jeffrey Adams, David Vogan, Peter Trapa and Marc van Leeuwen

Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations

Kazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups

On the geometric Langlands duality

A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Characters of the Negative Level Highest-Weight Modules for Affine Lie Algebras

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

Characters in Categorical Representation Theory

A CATEGORIFICATION OF INTEGRAL SPECHT MODULES. 1. Introduction

Parameters for Representations of Real Groups Atlas Workshop, July 2004 updated for Workshop, July 2005

Galois to Automorphic in Geometric Langlands

A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group

The geometric Satake isomorphism for p-adic groups

Twisted Harish-Chandra sheaves and Whittaker modules: The nondegenerate case

A comparison of Paley-Wiener theorems

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

Noncommutative counterparts of the Springer resolution

Reductive subgroup schemes of a parahoric group scheme

Proof of Langlands for GL(2), II

ON THE EXISTENCE OF (g, k)-modules OF FINITE TYPE. Ivan Penkov 1, Vera Serganova 2 and Gregg Zuckerman 3

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

An example of higher representation theory

Toshiaki Shoji (Nagoya University) Character sheaves on a symmetric space and Kostka polynomials July 27, 2012, Osaka 1 / 1

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

An Introduction to Kuga Fiber Varieties

ON DEGENERATION OF THE SPECTRAL SEQUENCE FOR THE COMPOSITION OF ZUCKERMAN FUNCTORS

Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

Unitarizable Minimal Principal Series of Reductive Groups

BIRTHING OPERS SAM RASKIN

RESEARCH STATEMENT. Contents

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

What elliptic cohomology might have to do with other generalized Schubert calculi

DUALITY BETWEEN GL(n; R) AND THE DEGENERATE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRA FOR gl(n)

From Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs

Cuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters

Representations of Totally Disconnected Groups

Hermitian and Unitary Representations for Affine Hecke Algebras

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

The curve and the Langlands program

Induced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

Hodge Theory and Unitary Representations of Reductive Lie Groups

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

Graded Calabi-Yau Algebras actions and PBW deformations

A BRIEF REVIEW OF ABELIAN CATEGORIFICATIONS

Go Yamashita. 11/Dec/2015 at Oxford

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

MULTIPLICITY FORMULAS FOR PERVERSE COHERENT SHEAVES ON THE NILPOTENT CONE

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

294 Meinolf Geck In 1992, Lusztig [16] addressed this problem in the framework of his theory of character sheaves and its application to Kawanaka's th

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

LECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O

ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT

DEFORMATIONS OF ALGEBRAS IN NONCOMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EXERCISE SHEET 1

CHARACTER SHEAVES, TENSOR CATEGORIES AND NON-ABELIAN FOURIER TRANSFORM

Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups

The Affine Grassmannian

Maximal antipodal subgroups in the automorphism groups of compact Lie algebras

Tempered Endoscopy for Real Groups II: spectral transfer factors

PERVERSE SHEAVES AND THE KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG CONJECTURES

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9

Algebra Qualifying Exam Solutions January 18, 2008 Nick Gurski 0 A B C 0

Del Pezzo surfaces and non-commutative geometry

Quaternionic Complexes

Subquotients of Minimal Principal Series

D-MODULES: AN INTRODUCTION

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

Whittaker models and Fourier coeffi cients of automorphic forms

Notes on Green functions

What is noncommutative algebraic geometry?

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

THE LOCAL LANGLANDS CONJECTURE. David A. Vogan, Jr.

Category O and its basic properties

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 23 Nov 2009

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

Non separated points in the dual spaces of semi simple Lie groups

Transcription:

Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials for Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trends in Representation Theory January 4, 2012, Boston

Outline What are KL polynomials for? How to compute KL polynomials Twisting by outer automorphisms twisted KL polynomials

Making repn theory algebraic G conn reductive alg gp def over R Natural problem: Describe irr repns (π, H π ) of G(R). Function-analytic: H π is Hilbert space. To do algebra: fix K (R) G(R) max compact. Analytic reps of K (R) = algebraic reps of K (Weyl s unitarian trick) H K π = K (R)-finite vecs in H π HC module of π Harish-Chandra: H K π is (g, K )-module (alg rep of g = Lie(G) with compatible alg rep of K ). HC: analytic G(R) reps = algebraic (g, K )-mods. Π(G(R)) = Π(g, K ) = equiv classes of irr mods.

From (g, K )-mods to constructible sheaves X = flag var of G, d = dim X = #(pos roots) = variety of Borel subalgebras of g = Lie(G) X is universal boundary for G-homog spaces. First made precise by Helgason conj (Kashiwara-Kowata-Minemura-Okamoto-Oshima-Tanaka). Beilinson-Bernstein loc thm: any rep (more or less) appears in secs of (more or less) eqvt line bundle on X. Which bundle infl char = action of cent of U(g). Example: F fin diml irr rep of G line bdle L F X; fiber at b = h + n is lowest wt space L F,b = F /nf = H 0 (n, F); F = alg secs of L F V fin length (g, K )-mod H F (V ) K -eqvt derived category of constructible sheaves on X. Cohom HF i (V ) is K -eqvt constr sheaf on X; fiber is H i F (V ) b = Hom h (F/nF, H i+d (n, V )).

Irreducible modules and perverse sheaves Given irr fin-diml rep F of G, have a functor H F from finite length (g, K )-mods to K -eqvt derived category of constr sheaves on flag var X. 1970s: for V irr, H F (V ) 0 if (Harish-Chandra, Langlands, Schmid) and only if (Casselman-Osborne) V has same infl char as F. Theorem (Beilinson-Bernstein, Kashiwara/Mebkhout,... ) Map V H F (V ) is bijection from irr (g, K )-mods, infl char of F to irr K -eqvt perverse sheaves on X. irr K -eqvt perverse sheaves on X pairs (O, S) (K -orbit on X, irr eqvt local system) n (B, σ) B G Borel, σ (B K )/(B K ) b o 0 /K n (H, +, σ) H θ-stable CSG, σ (H K )/(H K ) b o 0 /K n (H(R), +, σ) H(R) real CSG, σ H(R)/H(R) b o 0 /G(R).

What KL polys tell you Π F (G(R)) = params for irr reps, infl char of F = { (H(R), +, σ) } /G(R). x Π F (G(R)) I(x) standard rep (like Verma module), J(x) irr quotient. Recall d = dim X; put d x = dim(k -orbit for x). H F (I(x)) = loc sys S(x)[d x ] on one K -orbit H F (J(x)) = perverse extension P(x) Coeff of t i in KL poly P y,x is mult of loc sys S(y) in cohom P dx +2i (x). = mult of σ y in Hom hy (F/n y F, H (d dx )+2i(n y, J(x))). J(x) = y x P y,x (1)( 1) dy dx I(y).

The Hecke algebra Interested in category M(X, K ) of K -eqvt perverse sheaves on X. Analogue over finite field F q : vector space M(X, K ) q = {K (F q )-invt functions on X(F q )}. This vec space is module for Hecke algebra at q H q = {G(F q )-invt functions on X(F q )}. M(X, K ) ind of field; irrs are ratl /F q. Frobenius F is alg aut of G, K, X... Fixed pts = F q -ratl points. Alt sum of traces of F on fibers of cohomology sheaves at rational points maps (ratl) objects of M(X, K ) to M(X, K ) q. Lusztig: relate H q action to geometry of perverse sheaves compute P y,x.

Disconnected Want to consider G G, G /G finite. Rep theory for finite harder than for Lie, because Lie algebra linearizes problems. So arbitrary reductive G G too hard. Easy/useful special case: G /G finite cyclic. Action of G on G candidates corr to 1 Int(G) Aut(G) Out(G) 1 Fix G B p H p Π p simple roots, root datum (X (H p ), Π p, X (H p ), Π p ). Pinning p is B p H p plus choice of maps φ p (α): SL(2) G, α Π p. Now automorphism group sequence split by Aut p (G) = def auts permuting {φ p } root datum automorphisms Out(G).

Pinned Cplx conn reductive G, pinning p, Cartan inv θ preserves H p B p (fundamental), almost permutes {φ p }. Fix order two root datum aut δ δ p Aut p (G 0 ). Order two not critical, but easier and covers current applications. G = def G {1, δ p } our model disconn reductive group. δ p θ = θδ p, so δ p normalizes K ; K = def K {1, δ p }. Ex: δ induced by θ, so θ = Ad(t)δ p (t H p K ). Ex: G = SO(2n, C), H p = SO(2, C) n, θ = Ad(diag(1,..., 1, 1,..., 1, 1, 1)) (2p + 1 1s, 2q + 1 1s); means G(R) SO(2p + 1, 2q + 1). Have δ p = Ad(diag(1,..., 1, 1)); so G O(2n, C).

Reps of pinned G = def G {1, δ p }, K = def K {1, δ p }. V any (g, K )-module V δp same vector space; actions of g, K twisted by δ p. Gives action of on Π(g, K ). First way to make irr (g, K )-module: start with V V δp irr, V = V V δp. Gives bijection V Π(g, K ) reducible on (g, K ) two-elt orbits {V, V δp } of on Π(g, K ). Second way to make irr (g, K )-module: start with V V δp irr; choose intertwining op D p : V V δp, D 2 p = Id (two choices diff by sgn). Extend V to V, making δ p act by D p. Gives 2-to-1 map elts V of Π(g, K ) irr on (g, K ) fixed pts V of on Π(g, K ).

Application of δ root datum aut induced by Cartan inv θ. δ is trivial iff rk G = rk K. Theorem (consquence of Knapp-Zuckerman) V irr (g, K )-mod of real infl char. Then V admits invt Hermitian form iff V V δ. Corollary (Adams-van Leeuwen-Trapa-V-Yee) Every irr (g, K )-mod V of real infl char admits preferred invt Hermitian form. Case V = V V δp : form hyperbolic, V isotropic. Case V V irr: V admits invt Herm form. Two exts V to (g, K )-mod two invt forms on V. Relate invt forms on irrs to invt forms on std modules compute char formulas for (g, K )-mods.

Classifying irr mods for pinned disconn gps F fin-diml irr of G, lowest weight λ p X (H p ). Twist F δp = irr of lowest weight δλ p ; isom to F iff λ p is fixed by root datum aut δ. Case F F δp : no irr of infl char F has invt Herm form; irr (g, K )-mods all induced from irr (g, K )-mods. Case F F δp : fix canonical extension F of F to G rep, δ p acts triv on B p -lowest wt space. Get G -eqvt alg line bdle L F on X. Localization + Riemann-Hilbert gives functor H F from fin length (g, K )-mod to K -eqvt derived category of constr sheaves on X. Theorem (Beilinson-Bernstein, Kashiwara/Mebkhout,... ) Map V H F (V ) is bijection from irr (g, K )-mods, infl char of F to irr K -eqvt perverse sheaves on X.

K -eqvt irr perverse sheaves B G Borel B = N G (B). K preserves K b B K index two in B K K -eqvt loc sys S σ extends to K -eqvt B \ B meets K \ K in elt d automorphism d fixes char σ of (B K )/(B K ) 0. First way to make irr K -eqvt perverse sheaf: start with P P δp irr, P = P P δp. Built from local systems on orbits via classical KL polys. Second way to make irr K -eqvt perverse sheaf: start with P P δp irr; choose isom D p : P P δp, Dp 2 = Id (two choices diff by sgn). Make δ p act by D p ; P K -eqvt. First way local systems in P classical KL polys. New KL polys P δ y,x: x, y K -eqvt loc systems irr for K. Coeff of t i in P δ y,x is mult[local sys S(y)] mult[local sys S( y)] in P dx +2i (x).

The twisted Hecke algebra M(X, K ) = K -eqvt perverse sheaves on X. Over F q : use Frobenius map F twisted by δ p to get quasisplit form G(F q ) K (F q ) Easy F q -analogue of perverse sheaves is M(X, K ) q = {K (F q )-invt functions on X(F q )}. This vec space is module for Lusztig s quasisplit Hecke algebra at q H δ q = {G(F q )-invt functions on X(F q )}. Basis indexed by W δ = fixed subgp of root datum aut on W ; gens indexed by Π p /, aut orbits of simple roots. Relations involve dimensions of restricted root subgps: (very particular) unequal parameter Hecke algebra. Alt sum of traces of F on fibers of cohom sheaves at ratl pts maps (ratl) objects of M(X, K ) to M(X, K ) q. Lusztig: relate H δ q action to geom compute P δ y,x.