Reduction in Majority-Carrier Concentration in N-Doped or Al-Doped 4H-SiC Epilayer by Electron Irradiation

Similar documents
Enhancement of Ionization Efficiency of Acceptors by Their Excited States in Heavily Doped p-type GaN and Wide Bandgap Semiconductors

Change of Majority-Carrier Concentration in p-type Silicon by 10 MeV Proton Irradiation. Abstract

Dependence of Hole Concentration in p-type Silicon Solar Cell Wafers on Temperature and on Position within the Polycrystalline Ingot

Lecture 1. OUTLINE Basic Semiconductor Physics. Reading: Chapter 2.1. Semiconductors Intrinsic (undoped) silicon Doping Carrier concentrations

Review of Semiconductor Fundamentals

EE143 Fall 2016 Microfabrication Technologies. Evolution of Devices

A semiconductor is an almost insulating material, in which by contamination (doping) positive or negative charge carriers can be introduced.

Traps in MOCVD n-gan Studied by Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy and Minority Carrier Transient Spectroscopy

EECS143 Microfabrication Technology

ECE 442. Spring, Lecture -2

n i exp E g 2kT lnn i E g 2kT

GaN for use in harsh radiation environments

Electron-irradiation-induced deep levels in n-type 6H SiC. Citation Journal of Applied Physics, 1999, v. 85 n. 11, p

High-resolution photoinduced transient spectroscopy of radiation defect centres in silicon. Paweł Kamiński

Investigation of SiC by Positrons

Variation of Energy Bands with Alloy Composition E

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

Lecture 7: Extrinsic semiconductors - Fermi level

SURVEY OF RECENT RADIATION DAMGE STUDIES AT HAMBURG

Effects of Antimony Near SiO 2 /SiC Interfaces

A SEMICONDUCTOR DIODE. P-N Junction

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Physics of Radiation Effect and its Simulation for Non-Metallic Condensed Matter.

Electrically active defects in semiconductors induced by radiation

Semi-insulating SiC substrates for high frequency devices

Epitaxial SiC Schottky barriers for radiation and particle detection

physics/ Sep 1997

Lecture 2 - Carrier Statistics in Equilibrium. September 5, 2002

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Transport Properties of InAs-InP Solid Solutions. 2. Experiment. 1. Introduction. 3. Results and Discussion

Effect of fluence on defect structure of proton-irradiated high-resistivity silicon

EE 346: Semiconductor Devices

Direct and Indirect Semiconductor

Semiconductors. SEM and EDAX images of an integrated circuit. SEM EDAX: Si EDAX: Al. Institut für Werkstoffe der ElektrotechnikIWE

Creation and annealing of point defects in germanium crystal lattices by subthreshold energy events

ECE 250 Electronic Devices 1. Electronic Device Modeling

Charge Carriers in Semiconductor

Recitation 2: Equilibrium Electron and Hole Concentration from Doping

ECE 606 Homework Week 7 Mark Lundstrom Purdue University (revised 2/25/13) e E i! E T

1 Name: Student number: DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. Fall :00-11:00

M. De Napoli, F. Giacoppo, G. Raciti, E. Rapisarda, C. Sfienti. Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (LNS) INFN University of Catania. IPRD Oct.

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH STUDIES OF THE RADIATION HARDNESS OF OXYGEN-ENRICHED SILICON DETECTORS

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Fall Exam 1

Luminescence basics. Slide # 1

Chem 481 Lecture Material 3/20/09

Intrinsic Semiconductors

F O R SOCI AL WORK RESE ARCH

Carriers Concentration in Semiconductors - V. Prof.P. Ravindran, Department of Physics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India

Schottky Rectifiers Zheng Yang (ERF 3017,

PN Junction

Lecture 3b. Bonding Model and Dopants. Reading: (Cont d) Notes and Anderson 2 sections

Solid State Device Fundamentals

Study of semiconductors with positrons. Outlook:

Radiation hardness of Low Gain Amplification Detectors (LGAD)

Fabrication of a 600V/20A 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diode

Quiz #1 Practice Problem Set

Semiconductor Detectors

Author(s) Janzen, Erik; Suda, Jun; Kimoto, Ts. Citation Applied Physics Letters (2013), 102.

Lecture 4 - Carrier generation and recombination. February 12, 2007

ECE-305: Fall 2017 Metal Oxide Semiconductor Devices

smal band gap Saturday, April 9, 2011

Ion Implant Part 1. Saroj Kumar Patra, TFE4180 Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology ( NTNU )

High-temperature characteristics of SiC Schottky barrier diodes related to physical phenomena

For the following statements, mark ( ) for true statement and (X) for wrong statement and correct it.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. EECS 130 Professor Ali Javey Fall 2006

UConn ECE 4211, Semiconductor Devices and Nanostructures Lecture Week 1 January 17, 2017

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Professor Chenming Hu.

Hussein Ayedh. PhD Studet Department of Physics

EE 130 Intro to MS Junctions Week 6 Notes. What is the work function? Energy to excite electron from Fermi level to the vacuum level

Semiconductor Device Physics

CHAPTER 2: ENERGY BANDS & CARRIER CONCENTRATION IN THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM. M.N.A. Halif & S.N. Sabki

Lecture 2 - Carrier Statistics in Equilibrium. February 8, 2007

ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND CIRCUITS SUMMARY

ECE 440 Lecture 20 : PN Junction Electrostatics II Class Outline:

A new protocol to evaluate the charge collection efficiency degradation in semiconductor devices induced by MeV ions

Chapter 7. The pn Junction

ECE-305: Fall 2016 Minority Carrier Diffusion Equation (MCDE)

Midterm I - Solutions

Introduction to Semiconductor Physics. Prof.P. Ravindran, Department of Physics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India

STUDY OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES EXPOSED TO SPATIAL RADIATION

David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

EE 346: Semiconductor Devices. 02/08/2017 Tewodros A. Zewde 1

Minimal Update of Solid State Physics

RD50 Recent Results - Development of radiation hard sensors for SLHC

Development of Radiation Hard Si Detectors

Important point defects after γ and proton irradiation investigated by TSC technique

Solid State Device Fundamentals

ESE 372 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 5 Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor

Chap. 11 Semiconductor Diodes

Modeling of charge collection efficiency degradation in semiconductor devices induced by MeV ion beam irradiation

Preliminary measurements of charge collection and DLTS analysis of p + /n junction SiC detectors and simulations of Schottky diodes

ECE 142: Electronic Circuits Lecture 3: Semiconductors

XPS Depth Profiling of Epitaxial Graphene Intercalated with FeCl 3

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 8. Chem 4631

Al/Ti/4H SiC Schottky barrier diodes with inhomogeneous barrier heights

3.23 Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Materials

NITROGEN CONTAINING ULTRA THIN SiO 2 FILMS ON Si OBTAINED BY ION IMPLANTATION

Edge termination study and fabrication of a 4H SiC junction barrier Schottky diode

Semiconductor-Detectors

Classification of Solids

Crystal Properties. MS415 Lec. 2. High performance, high current. ZnO. GaN

Bipolar Junction Transistors: Solving Ebers-Moll Problems

Transcription:

Reduction in Majority-Carrier Concentration in -Doped or Al-Doped 4H-SiC Epilayer by Electron Irradiation Hideharu Matsuura, Hideki Yanagisawa, Kozo ishino, Takunori ojiri Shinobu Onoda, Takeshi Ohshima Japan Atomic Energy Agency The 9 th International Workshop on Radiation Effects on Semiconductor Devices for Space Applications (RASEDA-9) 27 October, 20, Takasaki, Japan Matsuura Laboratory

Background of our study Silicon carbide (SiC) is a promising wide bandgap semiconductor for fabricating high-power and high-frequency electronic devices capable of operating at elevated temperature under radiation environment. In order to understand the radiation-degradation of SiC electronic devices, changes of properties in SiC by radiation should be investigated. Matsuura Laboratory

Comparison of radiation resistance of Si and SiC 16 Al-doped Si Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] 13 12 : unirradiated : 0.5x 16 cm -2 of 0.5 MeV electrons Al-doped Si : unirradiated : 1x 16 cm -2 of 1 MeV electrons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ]

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Comparison of radiation resistance of Si and SiC 16 Al-doped Si Irradiation conditions 13 12 : unirradiated : 0.5x 16 cm -2 of 0.5 MeV electrons Al-doped Si : unirradiated : 1x 16 cm -2 of 1 MeV electrons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 1 MeV electrons 1x 16 cm -2 fluence p(t) decreased slightly.

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Comparison of radiation resistance of Si and SiC 16 Al-doped Si Irradiation conditions 13 12 : unirradiated : 0.5x 16 cm -2 of 0.5 MeV electrons Al-doped Si : unirradiated : 1x 16 cm -2 of 1 MeV electrons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 1 MeV electrons 1x 16 cm -2 fluence p(t) decreased slightly.

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Comparison of radiation resistance of Si and SiC 16 Al-doped Si Irradiation conditions 13 12 : unirradiated : 0.5x 16 cm -2 of 0.5 MeV electrons Al-doped Si : unirradiated : 1x 16 cm -2 of 1 MeV electrons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 1 MeV electrons 1x 16 cm -2 fluence p(t) decreased slightly. Irradiation conditions 0.5 MeV electrons 0.5x 16 cm -2 fluence p(t) decreased significantly.

To understand the origin of the decrease in p(t) in by electron irradiation, the densities and energy levels of acceptors and defects should be determined from p(t). How to accurately determine the densities and energy levels of acceptors and defects from p(t) Matsuura Laboratory

Free Carrier Concentration Spectroscopy H ( T, E ref ) º (FCCS) p( T ) ( kt) 5 / 2 2 exp æ ç è E ref kt The FCCS signal has a peak corresponding to each acceptor level or defect level. DE @ kt + E i peak i ref i @ kt H ( T, E ) exp( -1) peaki peak i ref ö ø Matsuura Laboratory

FCCS: H ( T, E ref ) º p( T ) ( kt) 2 5 / 2 exp æ ç è E ref kt ö ø Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] 16 Sample number SiC(0001) : #2 2 3 4 5 00/T [K -1 ] 348.7 mev 4.15x cm -3 H(T, 0.0085) [x 35 cm -6 ev -2.5 ] 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Sample number #2 Peak 507.8 K 1.70x 35 cm -6 ev -2.5 200 300 400 500 600 Temperature [K]

FCCS signal of H2(T, E ref ), in which the influence of the previously determined acceptor is removed, is calculated H2(T, 0.12) [x 36 cm -6 ev -2.5 ] 4 3 2 1 0 Peak Sample number #2 323.1 K 3.89x 36 cm -6 ev -2.5 200 300 400 500 600 Temperature [K] 225.8 mev 6.49x cm -3 Hole Comcentration [cm -3 ] 16 To verify the results determined by FCCS : Experimental data : Simulation A1 = 6.49 cm -3 DE A1 = 225.8 mev A2 = 4.15 cm -3 DE A2 = 348.7 mev comp = 1.45 13 cm -3 Sample number #2 2 3 4 5 00/T [K]

Relationship between Al and DA in unirradiated epilayer Unirradiated p-type 4H-SiC epilayers DA = 0.6 x Al 16 DA = 0.6 Al DA [cm -3 ] 16 Al [cm -3 ] The unknown deep acceptor is most likely related to Al Matsuura Laboratory

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] : 0 : 1 : 3 : 5 : 7 : 9 16 Fluence [cm -2 ] 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 0

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] : 0 : 1 : 3 : 5 : 7 : 9 16 Fluence [cm -2 ] 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 16 1

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] : 0 : 1 : 3 : 5 : 7 : 9 16 Fluence [cm -2 ] 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 16 3

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] : 0 : 1 : 3 : 5 : 7 : 9 16 Fluence [cm -2 ] 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 16 5

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] : 0 : 1 : 3 : 5 : 7 : 9 16 Fluence [cm -2 ] 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 16 7

Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] : 0 : 1 : 3 : 5 : 7 : 9 16 Fluence [cm -2 ] 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 00/T [K -1 ] 16 9

Fluence Dependence of Al and DA in 4H-SiC 16 Al or DA [x cm -3 ] : Al : DA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fluence of 200 kev Electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] Matsuura Laboratory

Al or DA [x cm -3 ] 16 Fluence Dependence of Al in 4H-SiC : Al : DA d Al( F) df k Al = = -k Al 4.4-17 Al ( F) cm 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fluence of 200 kev Electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] Matsuura Laboratory

Al or DA [x cm -3 ] 16 Fluence Dependence of DA in 4H-SiC : Al : DA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fluence of 200 kev Electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] d Al( F) df k Al = = -k dda( F) = - df - k k DA Al 4.4 Al ( F) dal( F) df ( F) DA = 1.0-17 DA -17 cm cm Matsuura Laboratory 2 2

Motivation of our study 1. To investigate changes of p(t) in Al-doped 4H-SiC by electron irradiation with lower energies (0 or 150 kev) 2. To investigate decreases of n(t) in -doped 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Matsuura Laboratory

Sample Configuration Investigation of acceptors in from p(t) obtained by Hall-effect measurements p-type epilayer Thickness: um Ohmic contact Ti/Al Substrate n + -type 4H-SiC wafer Size: 1x1 cm 2 Matsuura Laboratory

16 Change in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 0 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 0 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 5x 16 2 3 4 5 00/T [K -1 ] 0

16 Change in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 0 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 0 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 5x 16 2 3 4 5 00/T [K -1 ] 16 5 0 kev electron irradiation could not reduce p(t).

16 Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 150 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 150 kev electons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 3x 16 : 5x 16 1 2 3 4 5 00/T [ K -1 ] 0

16 Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 150 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 150 kev electons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 3x 16 : 5x 16 1 2 3 4 5 00/T [ K -1 ] 16 3

16 Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 150 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 150 kev electons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 3x 16 : 5x 16 1 2 3 4 5 00/T [ K -1 ] 16 5

16 Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 150 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 150 kev electons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 3x 16 : 5x 16 1 2 3 4 5 00/T [ K -1 ] E E Al Al DA DA 0 Simulation Result comp 15 = 6.3 cm = E + 0.22 ev = V V 2.7 14-3 15 = 4.9 cm = E + 0.38eV -3 cm -3

16 Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 150 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 150 kev electons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 3x 16 : 5x 16 1 2 3 4 5 00/T [ K -1 ] 16 3 Simulation Result E E Al Al DA DA comp = 5.5 = = E = V V + + 15 = 5.1 E 0.21eV 15 0.36 6.9 cm cm 14-3 -3 ev cm -3

16 Reduction in p(t) in Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC by 150 kev electron irradiation Fluence [cm -2 ] Hole Concentration [cm -3 ] Fluence of 150 kev electons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 3x 16 : 5x 16 1 2 3 4 5 00/T [ K -1 ] 16 5 Simulation Result E E Al Al DA DA = = comp = = 6.0 E V V + 15 0.20 7.4 E + 15 0.35 = 1.7 cm cm 15-3 ev cm -3 ev -3

7 Fluence Dependence of Al in 4H-SiC Acceptor Density [x cm -3 ] 6 5 4 3 2 1 Experimental data : Al : DA Simulation results : Al : DA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fluence of 150 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] Matsuura Laboratory

Acceptor Density [x cm -3 ] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fluence Dependence of Al in 4H-SiC Experimental data : Al : DA Simulation results : Al : DA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fluence of 150 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] d Al( F) df k Al = = -k Al 4.8-18 Al ( F) cm Matsuura Laboratory 2

Acceptor Density [x cm -3 ] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fluence Dependence of DA in 4H-SiC Experimental data : Al : DA Simulation results : Al : DA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fluence of 150 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] d Al( F) df k Al = = -k Al 4.4-17 Al ( F) cm Matsuura Laboratory 2

Acceptor Density [x cm -3 ] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fluence Dependence of DA in 4H-SiC Experimental data : Al : DA Simulation results : Al : DA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fluence of 150 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] d Al( F) df k Al = = -k dda( F) = - df - k k DA Al 4.4 Al ( F) dal( F) df ( F) DA = 1-17 -18 DA cm cm Matsuura Laboratory 2 2

Comparison of removal cross sections for Al-doped 4H-SiC by 150 and 200 kev electron irradiation 150 kev 200 kev k Al k DA [cm 2 ] [cm 2 ] 4.8 1.0-18 -18 4.4 1.0-17 -17 kal kda and for 150 kev electron irradiation is lower by one order than that for 200 kev electron irradiation Matsuura Laboratory

Sample Configuration Investigation of donors in -doped 4H-SiC from n(t) obtained by Hall-effect measurements n-type -doped 4H-SiC epilayer Thickness: um Ohmic contact i Substrate p + -type 4H-SiC wafer Size: 3x3 mm 2 Matsuura Laboratory

Reduction in n(t) in -doped n-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation -doped 4H-SiC Fluence [cm -2 ] Electron Concentration [cm -3 ] 13 12 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 1x 16 : 2x 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 00/T [K -1 ] 0

Reduction in n(t) in -doped n-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation -doped 4H-SiC Fluence [cm -2 ] Electron Concentration [cm -3 ] 13 12 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 1x 16 : 2x 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 00/T [K -1 ] 16 1

Reduction in n(t) in -doped n-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation -doped 4H-SiC Fluence [cm -2 ] Electron Concentration [cm -3 ] 13 12 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 1x 16 : 2x 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 00/T [K -1 ] 16 2 200 kev electron irradiation reduced n(t).

Reduction in n(t) in -doped n-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation -doped 4H-SiC Fluence [cm -2 ] Electron Concentration [cm -3 ] 13 12 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 1x 16 : 2x 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 00/T [K -1 ] Simulation Result E E H H K K 0 14 = 4.7 cm = EC - 0.07 ev 15 = 4.9 cm = E - 0.12 ev C -3-3

Electron Concentration [cm -3 ] 13 12 Reduction in n(t) in -doped n-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 1x 16 : 2x 16 -doped 4H-SiC 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 00/T [K -1 ] Fluence [cm -2 ] 16 1 Simulation Result E E H H K K = 1.6 = = = E C 4.0 E C - - 14 0.09 ev 14 0.12 cm cm -3 ev -3

Electron Concentration [cm -3 ] 13 12 Reduction in n(t) in -doped n-type 4H-SiC by 200 kev electron irradiation Fluence of 200 kev electrons [cm -2 ] : 0 : 1x 16 : 2x 16 -doped 4H-SiC 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 00/T [K -1 ] Fluence [cm -2 ] 16 2 Simulation Result E E H H K K < 1 = = = E C 0.09 4.1 E C - - 13 cm 14 0.12-3 ev cm -3 ev

Donor Density [x cm -3 ] 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fluence Dependence of H in 4H-SiC Experimental data : H : K Simulation results : H : K -doped 4H-SiC 0 1 2 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] Matsuura Laboratory

Donor Density [x cm -3 ] 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fluence Dependence of H in 4H-SiC Experimental data : H : K Simulation results : H : K -doped 4H-SiC 0 1 2 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] d H( F) df k H = -k H = 1.2 H -16 ( F) cm Matsuura Laboratory 2

Donor Density [x cm -3 ] 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fluence Dependence of K in 4H-SiC Experimental data : H : K Simulation results : H : K -doped 4H-SiC 0 1 2 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] d H( F) df k H = -k H = 1.2 H -16 ( F) cm Matsuura Laboratory 2

Donor Density [x cm -3 ] 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fluence Dependence of H and K in 4H-SiC Experimental data : H : K Simulation results : H : K -doped 4H-SiC 0 1 2 Fluence of 200 kev electrons [x 16 cm -2 ] d H( F) df k d K( F) df k H K = = -k = -k H = 1.2 K 6.0 H -16-18 K ( F) cm ( F) cm Matsuura Laboratory 2 2

Comparison of removal cross sections for 200 kev electron irradiation of donors located at hexagonal and cubic C-sublattice sites 200 kev k H k K [cm 2 ] [cm 2 ] 1.2 6.0-16 -18 donors at hexagonal C-sublattice sites are less radiation-resistant than donors at cubic C- sublattice sites. Matsuura Laboratory

Conclusion In Al-doped p-type 4H-SiC 1. p(t) was unchanged by 0 kev electron irradiation. 2. 150 kev electron irradiation may transform Al acceptors into deep acceptors. In -doped n-type 4H-SiC 3. donors at hexagonal sites are less radiation-resistant than donors at cubic sites.