Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 82, No. 5, pp , October 1992 A SLOW EARTHQUAKE IN THE SANTA MARIA BASIN, CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Using information about wave amplitudes to learn about the earthquake size.

Apparent Slow Oceanic Transform Earthquakes Due to Source Mechanism Bias

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 70, No. 5, pp , October 1980 THE REPRODUCING EARTHQUAKES OF THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS

revised October 30, 2001 Carlos Mendoza

Source Complexity of the 1994 Northridge Earthquake and Its Relation to Aftershock Mechanisms

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards Earth - Chapter 11 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Short Note Source Mechanism and Rupture Directivity of the 18 May 2009 M W 4.6 Inglewood, California, Earthquake

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

Rupture directivity and source-process time of the September 20, 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake estimated from Rayleigh-wave phase velocity

Earthquakes. Forces Within Eartth. Faults form when the forces acting on rock exceed the rock s strength.

Earthquakes.

Regional Bias in Estimates of Earthquake Ms Due to Surface-Wave Path Effects

Earthquakes Chapter 19

Topography on Earthquake Motions in Sedimentary Basins

EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS OF MODERATELY EARTHQUAKE IN THE SOUTH EASTERN IRAN BASED ON TELESEISMIC AND REGIONAL DISTANCES

GEOLOGY MEDIA SUITE Chapter 13

EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE MECHANISMS SHOW MOTION

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 81, No. 6, pp , December 1991

Earthquakes Earth, 9th edition, Chapter 11 Key Concepts What is an earthquake? Earthquake focus and epicenter What is an earthquake?

of other regional earthquakes (e.g. Zoback and Zoback, 1980). I also want to find out

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

Potency-magnitude scaling relations for southern California earthquakes with 1.0 < M L < 7.0

I. Locations of Earthquakes. Announcements. Earthquakes Ch. 5. video Northridge, California earthquake, lecture on Chapter 5 Earthquakes!

State of Stress in Seismic Gaps Along the SanJacinto Fault

CAP M S Wallace. Vol. 27 No. 2 Jun EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH IN CHINA M S 4. 8 CAP. 3km - - P315

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

FOCAL MECHANISM DETERMINATION USING WAVEFORM DATA FROM A BROADBAND STATION IN THE PHILIPPINES

Centroid moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Tsunami waveform analyses of the 2006 underthrust and 2007 outer-rise Kurile earthquakes

CHAPTER 1 BASIC SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE TERMINOLGY. Earth Formation Plate Tectonics Sources of Earthquakes...

Di#erences in Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Characteristics between Surface and Buried Crustal Earthquakes

Earthquakes How and Where Earthquakes Occur

CRUSTAL STRUCTURE AND SURFACE-WAVE DISPERSION. PART II SOLOMON ISLANDS EARTHQUAKE OF JULY 29, 1950* By MAURICE EWING and FRANK PRESS

Seismic Reflection Views of the 1994 Northridge Earthquake Hypocentral Region Using Aftershock Data and Imaging Techniques

4((F'~) 2) = ~ = (2)

Crustal Deformation. Earth Systems 3209

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

SHORT NOTES THE 3 DECEMBER 1988, PASADENA EARTHQUAKE (ML = 4.9) RECORDED WITH THE VERY BROADBAND SYSTEM IN PASADENA

A century of oil-field operations and earthquakes in the greater Los Angeles Basin, southern California

Seth Stein and Emile Okal, Department of Geological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston IL USA. Revised 2/5/05

Routine Estimation of Earthquake Source Complexity: the 18 October 1992 Colombian Earthquake

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

CHARACTERIZING EARTHQUAKE SLIP MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION

Earthquake Focal Mechanisms and Waveform Modeling

Moment tensor inversion of near source seismograms

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Source parameters II. Stress drop determination Energy balance Seismic energy and seismic efficiency The heat flow paradox Apparent stress drop

5. What is an earthquake 6. Indicate the approximate radius of the earth, inner core, and outer core.

ACCOUNTING FOR SITE EFFECTS IN PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS: OVERVIEW OF THE SCEC PHASE III REPORT

RELATION BETWEEN RAYLEIGH WAVES AND UPLIFT OF THE SEABED DUE TO SEISMIC FAULTING

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

LOCAL MAGNITUDE SCALE FOR MONGOLIA AND DETERMINATION OF M WP AND M S (BB)

Scattering and intrinsic attenuation structure in Central Anatolia, Turkey using BRTR (PS-43) array

Source Characteristics of Large Outer Rise Earthquakes in the Pacific Plate

SOURCE PROCESS OF THE 2003 PUERTO PLATA EARTHQUAKE USING TELESEISMIC DATA AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

Estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration for Delhi Region using Finsim, a Finite Fault Simulation Technique

Resolution of the slow earthquake/high apparent stress paradox for oceanic transform fault earthquakes

Rotation of the Principal Stress Directions Due to Earthquake Faulting and Its Seismological Implications

TWO SLOW SURFACE WAVES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA* By FRANK PRESS and MAURICE EWING

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

3D VISCO-ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN THE BORREGO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

Centroid-moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Materials and Methods The deformation within the process zone of a propagating fault can be modeled using an elastic approximation.

Rupture Characteristics of Major and Great (M w 7.0) Megathrust Earthquakes from : 1. Source Parameter Scaling Relationships

RISKY HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS RESONATING WITH THE LONG-PERIOD STRONG GROUND MOTIONS IN THE OSAKA BASIN, JAPAN

STUDYING THE IMPORTANT PARAMETERS IN EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION BASED ON STOCHASTIC FINITE FAULT MODELING

Equivalent Medium Parameters for Numerical Modeling in Media with Near-Surface Low Velocities

UNIT - 7 EARTHQUAKES

INTRODUCTION TO EARTHQUAKES

Simulation of earthquake rupture process and strong ground motion

S e i s m i c W a v e s

Teleseismic waveform modelling of the 2008 Leonidio event

Elastic rebound theory

Earthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network , preliminary results

Dangerous tsunami threat off U.S. West Coast

log 4 0.7m log m Seismic Analysis of Structures by TK Dutta, Civil Department, IIT Delhi, New Delhi. Module 1 Seismology Exercise Problems :

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 12: Earthquake source mechanisms and radiation patterns II

Rupture Process of the Great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake

Earthquake Stress Drops in Southern California

SURFACE WAVE MODELLING USING SEISMIC GROUND RESPONSE ANALYSIS

What is an Earthquake?

Source rupture process of the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake determined by joint inversion of teleseismic body wave and strong ground motion data

Figure Diagram of earth movements produced by (a) P-waves and (b) S-waves.

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies ADVANCED WAVEFORM SIMULATION FOR SEISMIC MONITORING EVENTS

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies ADVANCED WAVEFORM SIMULATION FOR SEISMIC MONITORING

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS OF THE EARTH, Vol. 19, No. 1,

Source Parameters and Scaling Relation for Local Earthquakes in the Garhwal and Kumaun Himalaya, India

VALIDATION AGAINST NGA EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SIMULATED MOTIONS FOR M7.8 RUPTURE OF SAN ANDREAS FAULT

Earthquake stress drop estimates: What are they telling us?

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Ground displacement in a fault zone in the presence of asperities

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION CONSIDERING ASPERITY AND DIRECTIVITY OF FAULT

A METHOD FOR DETERMINING ASPERITY PARAMETERS PRODUCING SPECIFIC MAXIMUM GROUND MOTION

Objectives. Vocabulary

Determining the Earthquake Epicenter: Japan

Transcription:

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 82, No. 5, pp. 287-296, October 1992 A SLOW ARTHQUAK IN TH SANTA MARIA BASIN, CALIFORNIA BY HIROO KANAMORI AND GILL HAUKSSON ABSTRACT An M L = 3.5 earthquake near Santa Maria, California, was recorded by the Southern California Seismic Network and a TRRAscope station at Santa Barbara (SBC) on 31 January 1991. The waveform of this event is dominated by 2- to 5-sec waves, and is different from that of ordinary events with similar size. Inquiries into operations in several oil fields in the area revealed that hydro-fracturing at a pressure of about 8 bars was being done at a depth of 1 to 3 m in the Orcutt oil field in the Santa Maria basin from about 9 to 11 a.m. on 31 January and the earthquake occurred in the afternoon. Field evidence of 3-cm displacement to a depth of 3 m was reported. The field evidence as well as the first-motion data indicates that the event had a thrust mechanism with the P axis in the NN-SSW direction, which is in agreement with the regional stress field. From the analysis of the SBC record and the field evidence, we conclude that the source must be shallower than 1 km and the ratio of the radiated energy to the seismic moment is about 6.2 1-7, one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that of ordinary earthquakes. The occurrence of this earthquake demonstrates that release of regional tectonic stress in shallow sediments can yield significant seismic radiation at periods of a few seconds, the period range of engineering importance for large structures, and has important implications for excitation of long-period ground motions from large earthquakes in sedimentary basins. INTRODUCTION On 31 January 1991, an anomalous earthquake was recorded at seismic stations of the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN). This event was located at 34.8 N and 12.4 W (origin time: 23:28:18 GMT) near Orcutt in the Santa Maria basin, California (Fig. la), felt in the Santa Maria area, and was given M L = 3.5. The P wave was very emergent, and no S wave could be identified on the short-period SCSN seismograms (Fig. lb). It was also recorded with the three-component broadband seismograph of the TRRAscope station at Santa Barbara (SBC) at a distance of 7 km (Fig. la). However, the seismogram recorded at SBC was so unusual that we could not immediately identify it as a regional earthquake; we accidentally noticed it while we were examining the S-wave coda of a large (M s = 6.6, depth = 15 kin) intermediate-depth earthquake in the Hindu-Kush region that occurred at about the same time. Figure 2a compares a Wood-Anderson seismogram of this earthquake (simulated from the SBC TRRAscope broadband record) with the seismogram of an ordinary event with about the same magnitude recorded at about the same distance. The anomalous nature of this event is evident. Neither P nor S wave is distinct, and the duration, about 2 minutes, is unusually long for an M L = 3.5 event. Kovach (1974) analyzed seismograms of events caused by collapse in the Wilmington oil field near Long Beach, California. The SBC record of the Santa 287

288 I-I. KANAMORI AND. HAUKSSON c~ i ~i!!!iill!l~l ~l~ll~i ~ ~~!! 6ap 'aouols!@ ~ t~ o9-~ cr o LaJ C).]D ~6 -- ~.!... " ". -~:!ii ;': o: :--... C_f) c5 Z o I.') red W)

SLOW ARTHQUAK IN SANTA MARIA BASIN, CALIFORNIA 289 o 8& ca f-.. II o ~ ~5 "r'- t"- O9 g O~ Q If) ~5 o m xi A!p/suoJO!W 'apn;!ldwv ~8 5~ m ~ i o 1 as OQ~ ~9 ~en C O_ mm

29 H. KANAMORI AND. HAUKSSON Maria event is very similar to the records of the Wilmington events and suggests a similar origin for the Santa Maria event. The epicenter is within the Orcutt oil field in the Santa Maria basin (see Fig. la). After several inquiries about oil extraction activities in the oil fields in the area, we found that hydro-fracturing at a pressure of about 8 bars was being done at a depth of 1 to 3 m in the Orcutt oil field from about 9 to 11 a.m. on 31 January 1991. While perforation gear was being lowered into one of the wells, the earthquake occurred (Charlie Catherman, personal comm., 1991). The deformation of liners in several wells at similar depths suggests that the Santa Maria event was caused by failure of sediments at shallow depth. Because of its very shallow depth, the earthquake excited large surface waves at periods near the resonance period of the sedimentary layers. WAVFORM AT SBC Figure 2b shows the displacement record at SBC. In addition to the standard three-component (Z, N, and ) traces, the radial and transverse components are shown. The first 6 sec shows a coherent dispersive wave train, suggesting a Rayleigh wave on the vertical and radial components and a Love wave on the transverse component. The latter half (6 to 12 sec) of the wave train is dominated by the -W component. This is probably a Love wave scattered by the structure between the epicenter and SBC. The path from the epicenter to SBC is primarily in the Santa Maria basin, but it crosses the Santa Ynez mountains near the SBC station. The scattering could be due to the structures near the basin boundaries. We used the unscattered first 6 sec of the Love wave for the analysis. The group velocity of this wavetrain, ranging from 1.5 to 2 km/sec for a period of 5 to 8 sec, is in agreement with the group velocity (Fig. 3) computed for the structure shown in the figure. The P velocities for this structure are taken from the southeastern end of a Gabilan Range profile published by Walter and Mooney (1982). The S velocities were first computed from the P velocities with a Poisson's ratio of.25, and later were slightly modified to match the observed group velocities. FILD DATA The field data provided by Catherman (personal comm., 1991) and Shemeta (written comm., 1992) are summarized in Figure 4. The Orcutt oil field where the hydro-fracturing was performed has five wells in a circular area about 36 m in diameter. All the liners in the casings were deformed into S shape with a maximum offset of approximately 3 cm. The depths to the S-shaped deformations range from 135 to 28 m. Catherman estimates the fault dip to be about 4 to SSW. Most bedding planes in the area have dips of 1 to 15. The direction of the slip on the fault plane could not be determined. SOURC PARAMTRS The first motions from this event recorded at SCSN and the Pacific Gas and lectric Company (PG and ) seismic network were very emergent. Out of 41 first-motion data, 34 were reported as "up," with only seven being reported as "down." Three impulsive firstmmotion data were all up. Since the event is very shallow and the velocity in the source region is very low, all the first motions should plot near the center of the focal mechanism diagram. All the first

SLOW ARTHQUAK IN SANTA MARIA BASIN, CALIFORNIA 291 b~ ~9 ffl h~ CO U3 U3 U3 (. O ~3 v- CO ~') 9 o ~ ~ o o o O c-1 h~ td 8 ~9 O O ~9 m c~ % O c~ o9,4 r i r I I r J i i I i, r iii i i r Iii i i Ii, r i I~r, r ~ t~ CO ~ 4 td CM oes/w~ '/[~!oolea Q 9

292 H. KANAMORI AND. HAUKSSON Field Dola and Mechonism Hydro-Fracturing at 17-24 bars Distribution of Wells oo o o Casings o Fault Dips 4 to SSW 1 St Motion 34 "up" 36m--~ Maximum Offset 3 cm \ 7 "down" at depths ot 135 to 28 m Fie. 4. The field data obtained from the Orcutt oil field. The S-shaped curve is a sketch of the deformed casings. The mechanism diagram (stereographic projection of the lower focal hemisphere) is constructed from the field data and the first-motion data. motions should be up if the faulting was reverse on a dipping plane, and down if it was a normal faulting. Thus, the overwhelmingly up first motions suggest a thrust faulting, as shown in Figure 4. Here, the rake is assumed to be 9. We interpreted the SBC record using the thrust mechanism. Figure 5a shows the spectrum of the observed Love wave ( to 6 sec on Fig. 2b). Curve a shows the excitation spectrum for a point source placed at a depth of 5 m in the crust shown in Figure 3. It is computed for a pure reverse fault with a dip angle of 4 and a strike of 112.5, as suggested from the field data and the first-motion data. The method described in Kanamori and Stewart (1976) is used for this computation. If a source depth of 5 km is used, the excitation function peaks at 7 sec with a rapid roll-off above.2 Hz. Thus, the observed large amplitude in periods shorter than 5 sec requires a very shallow source. The observed spectrum exhibits a spectral hole at about.3 Hz with a rapid roll-off at frequencies higher than.5 Hz. Kovach (1974) found a similar behavior for earthquakes in the Wilmington oil field and explained it with a slow rupture propagation model. We could not determine whether the observed spectral hole and the rapid roll-off at high frequencies were due to slow rupture or slow dislocation particle velocity, but an overall source time constant, To, of about 3 sec is required. Since only one record is available, any combination of rupture length and rupture velocity with a ratio of 3 sec explains the data. Kovach (1974) obtained a very slow rupture velocity, about.13 km/sec, for the events in the Wilmington oil field. In Figure 5a, we used a combination of a rupture velocity of.13 km/sec and a rupture length of.4 kin. Although this combination is not unique, the rupture length of.4 km is comparable to the linear dimension of the area where the wells are distributed and is also consistent with the source dimension estimated from the seismic slip and moment, as will be shown later. Multiplying the finiteness spectrum (Ben- Menachem, 1961), sin(~rf~'o)/~rfir o, computed for this combination by the point source spectrum, we obtained the source spectrum shown by curve b in Figure 5a, which is similar to the observed spectrum. A seismic moment of 6.1 x 121 dyne-cm is required to explain the observed amplitude. Figure 5b compares the observed Love wave with the synthetic waveform computed for the source model shown in Figure 5b. In this calculation, the Love-wave Q is assumed to be 1. The overall agreement of the waveform is satisfactory. Thus, although we could

SLOW ARTHQUAK IN SANTA MARIA BASIN, CALIFORNIA 293 V ~o F r~' I... I oj " (D 1 ~O x q:l o I a (/] 43 ou- & c5o..j.~ Q~ 1 " o 4..) ~9 4z 9.g- O, g c~ Od ~ CO ~O ~1" 4 ~ C) C) o c5 o (5 c~ oes-w 'epnl!ldwv lejleds ~o C2

294 H. KANAMORI AND. HAUKSSON not determine the rupture characteristics uniquely, we consider the slow rupture model described above to be reasonable. The compression axis of the mechanism shown in Figure 4 is in NN-SSW direction, which agrees with the direction of regional shortening determined from the geodetic data (Feigl et al., 199). The thrust mechanism shown in Figure 4 places the Santa Barbara station fairly close to the radiation node of Love waves. Considering the uncertainties in the mechanism, we then consider an alternative strike-slip mechanism, which puts SBC near the radiation maximum. For this mechanism, we obtained a seismic moment of 1.2 x 121 dyne-cm, which can be considered a minimum seismic moment for this event. SLIP, SISMIC MOMNT, AND NRGY In the following calculation, we use a seismic moment 4 121 dyne-cm as the average of the two seismic moments estimated above. Using p = 1.8 g/cm 3, and fi = 1.54 km/sec from Figure 3, we obtain/~ = pfi2 = 4.3 x 1 l dyne/cm 2. If the displacement is 3 cm as suggested by the field data, the area S is Mo/I~D = 3.1 15 m 2, which gives a representative dimension of the source, S 1/2, of 56 m. This value is comparable to that inferred from the spectral hole and the dimension of the area where the wells are distributed. The total energy radiated from this event can be approximately estimated as follows. Since the spectrum of the transverse component of the ground-motion velocity at SBC has a sharp peak at.35 Hz, as shown in Figure 6, we assume that the most energy is contained in the fundamental mode Love wave at f =.35 Hz. Then the total radiated energy is given by co = 2~rAh exp(2ka)cpf v2(t) dt. (i).8.7.6 I I I I t I I ' 31sbcbt.sp (-12 sec) ~..5 "~.4 O9.3 o.2 (D.1.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Frequency, Hz FIG. 6. Spectrum of the transverse component of the ground-motion velocity at SBC.

SLOW ARTHQUAK IN SANTA MARIA BASIN, CALIFORNIA 295 Here, v(t) is the ground-motion velocity at distance A, p is the density at the surface, c is the phase velocity at.35 Hz, k is the attenuation constant (i.e., 7rf/Qc), and h is the thickness of the effective wave guide, which is given by co -h = fo P(z)Y2(z)dz p(o)y2(o) where y(z) is the Love-wave amplitude as a function of depth at.35 HR. Using the normal mode computed for the structure shown in Figure 3, we obtained = 1.2 km. Integrating the velocity trace of the transverse component, we obtain fo 3c V(t)2dt =.68 13 cm2/sec. Substituting this and using c = 1.75 km/sec, p = 1.8 g/cm 3 in (1), we obtain = 2.4 115 ergs. The ratio of the energy to seismic moment is thus lm o = 6.2 1-7, which is much smaller than the ratios 5 1 5 to 5 1-6 for ordinary earthquakes (Kanamori, 1977; Vassiliou and Kanamori, 1982), reflecting the slow nature of this earthquake. CONCLUSION Although we could not uniquely determine the detailed geometry of the source mechanism, the present result demonstrates that release of regional tectonic stress in shallow sediments can yield significant seismic radiation at periods of a few seconds. The dominant period is much longer than that of ordinary earthquakes with a comparable magnitude and is within the period range of engineering importance for large structures. In this regard, the present result has important implications for excitation of long-period ground motions from large earthquakes in sedimentary basins. ACKNOWLDGMNT We thank Charlie Catherman for providing us with the field data from the Orcutt oil field. We also thank Jim Mori for providing us with the recbrd section of the Southern California Seismic Network, and William Savage and Marcia McLaren for providing us with the data obtained from the Seismic Network of the Pacific Gas and lectric Company. We thank Julie Shemeta for information on the well locations in the Orcutt oil field. This research was partially supported by the U.S. Geological Survey Grant 14-8-1-G1774 and a grant from the L.K. Whittier Foundation. Contribution No. 5173, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. RFRNCS Ben-Menachem, A. (1961). Radiation of seismic surface waves from finite moving sources, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 51, 41-435. Feigl, K. L., R. W. King, and T. H. Jordan (199). Geodetic measurement of tectonic deformation in the Santa Maria fold and thrust belt, California, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 2679-2699.

296 H. KANAMORI AND. HAUKSSON Kanamori, H. (1977). The energy release in great earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2981-2987. Kanamori, H. and G. S. Stewart (1976). Mode of the strain release along the Gibbs fracture zone, mid-atlantic ridge, Phys. arth Planet Interiors. 11, 312-332. Kovach, R. L. (1974). Source mechanisms for Wilmington oil field, California, subsidence earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 64, 699-711. Vassiliou, M. S. and H. Kanamori (1982). The energy release in earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 371-387. Walter, A. W. and W. D. Mooney (1982). Crustal structure of the Diablo and Gabilan ranges, central California: a reinterpretation of existing data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 1567-159. SISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUT OF TCHNOLOGY PASADNA, CALIFORNIA 91125 Manuscript received 18 June 1992