Daytona Beach International Airport Connector

Similar documents
Daytona Beach Greyhound Bus Terminal Connector

Prospect City Limits/Project Study Area. County Boundary

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. POLK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME 1. Page CHAPTER 1. GENERAL... A-1

MEETS ALL SCREENING CRITERIA

WELCOME. Why am I here? FM 1516: I-10 E. TO FM 78 Open House. Judson High School Tuesday, May 22, :00-7:00pm. Learn about the proposed project

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning

8700 Xylon Avenue N CONTACT US. Brooklyn Park, MN OFFICE WAREHOUSE BUILDING FOR SALE > Erik Nordstrom

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

Traffic Impact Study

High Speed / Commuter Rail Suitability Analysis For Central And Southern Arizona

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

SHEET 22 of 36 NH-69. SHEET 14 of 36 NH-67. SHEET 25 of 36 NH-70. SHEET 21 of 36 NH-69 NH-69 NH-70 NH-71 NH-72-A. SHEET 28 of 36 NH-71

DOWNTOWN / WEST END PRIME RESTAURANT & RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Appendix I: Traffic Study

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Exhibit IV.B Amendment Language. Revise the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

MUSKOGEE, MUSKOGEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Railroad. Interstate. Corporate Limit. US Highway MUSKOGEE. State Highway.

Economic Activity Economic A ctivity

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

NON-RESIDENTIAL LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE DISTRICT (NR-LM)

Local Economic Activity Around Rapid Transit Stations

City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy

FAR NORTH DISTRICT PLAN 2009

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

T k b p M r will so ordered by Ike one who quits squuv. fe2m per year, or year, jo ad vaoce. Pleaie and THE ALTO SOLO

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles

FIGURE 2-39 LITTLE SISTER BAY AND MCRAE FARM SHIFT

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

Land Use and Zoning Page 1 of 10 LAND USE AND ZONING

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg

Urban White Paper on Tokyo Metropolis 2002

248,700. with a population of. The UK s most central city. Location DERBY LONDON. 93 minutes ST. Manchester. Sheffield. Stoke -on-trent.

Updating the Urban Boundary and Functional Classification of New Jersey Roadways using 2010 Census data

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY

Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN. October J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814

D Yes ~ No D To Be Determined

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

DOWNTOWN SILVER SPRING PURPLE LINE [COMING SOON] KEFA CA SAFEWAY BB&T MANDALAY RESTAURAN AND CAFE MIX BAR AND GRILLE ADDI S ABABA RESTAURANT

Environmental Justice Areas with 2040 Roads

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

Ellis County-Midlothian to Waxahachie Trail Corridor Research

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101

2015 Grand Forks East Grand Forks TDM

STAND OUT IN THE SHUFFLE

Planning & Zoning Commission

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

SBCAG Travel Model Upgrade Project 3rd Model TAC Meeting. Jim Lam, Stewart Berry, Srini Sundaram, Caliper Corporation December.

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report OKALOOSA-WALTON OUTLOOK 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

St. Mary s County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Article 5. REGULATION OF USES. Schedule 50.4 Use Classifications. Legend

CORRIDORS OF FREEDOM Access Management (Ability) Herman Pienaar: Director City Transformation and Spatial Planning

A TELEGRAPH AVE. BERKELEY, CA GROSS FLOOR AREA UNIT MIX PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW AND ZONING APPLICATION SET: 04/17/2015 PROJECT TEAM

GAMPO 2018 FALL MEETING. National Performance Research Data Set GAMPO 2018 FALL MEETING (NPMRDS) CASE STUDY GAMPO FALL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2018

Modeling Land Use Change Using an Eigenvector Spatial Filtering Model Specification for Discrete Response

Information for File MVP RMM

Sensitivity of estimates of travel distance and travel time to street network data quality

Making maps: Traditions and perceptions in Europe. European spatial planning and cartographic representations

LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

BURROWAY TIMBREBONGIE TIMBREBONGIE FALLS. Department of Finance, Services & Innovation 2017

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

BROOKINGS May

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

GIS-BASED VISUALIZATION FOR ESTIMATING LEVEL OF SERVICE Gozde BAKIOGLU 1 and Asli DOGRU 2

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

PINELLAS COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FORECAST 2035 EMPLOYMENT SOCIOECONOMIC DATA FINAL REPORT

Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes

General Neighborhood Map

COMMERCIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY $1,800,000

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

SECTION 7 RAMP TERMINAL SIGNS

2009 NOISE MANAGEMENT REPORT. Working with our Community for a Quieter Future

Rational Equations and Graphs

Chapter 12. Key Issue Three: Why do business services locate in large settlements?

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

HSIP FUNDING APPLICATION

JCRD501: RURAL COUNTY ROADWAY SPECIFICATIONS

The effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion in Florida

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672

CHAPTER 3 TRANSPORTATION

CITY OF PORTLAND, TEXAS SERVICE PLAN FOR ANNEXATION AREA

Crow River Plaza - Retail Development South Diamond Lake Rd. Rogers, MN FOR LEASE 1,024 SF Retail Space. Lease Rate: $16.

Visitation: Recreation and Tourism Model

106 PURDUE ENGINEERING EXTENSION DEPARTMENT

Using GIS to Determine Goodness of Fit for Functional Classification. Eric Foster NWMSU MoDOT

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road

Crow River Plaza - Retail Development South Diamond Lake Rd. Rogers, MN FOR LEASE 2,066 SF Retail Space. Lease Rate: $16.

Creating a Pavement Management System Using GIS

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

For Sale - 56 Acre Sandstone Quarry State Route 511, Oberlin/Kipton, OH 44075

Transcription:

trategic ntermodal ystem Highway s ssessment ntroduction aytona each nternational irport aytona each nternational irport ( is a convenient alternative to the uncertainties of rlando and Jacksonville traffic and it is the "Gateway to entral Florida. n addition, also facilities Foreign rade Zone (FZ # 198 which increases the global competitiveness of companies doing business in aytona each by reducing operating costs associated with international trade. he aytona each nternational irport connector as shown in 1-1 connects to -9, a Florida nterstate Highway ystem facility. o ensure that merging facilities provide additional connectivity to developing economic regions, rather than provide redundancy to hubs, merging facilities can be designated only if they are located greater than miles from the nearest hub of the same type. he minimum size threshold for merging airports is to handle. percent of the nation s total freight or passenger enplanements to be eligible for designation as an merging facility. merging airports must be located in or adjacent to a fast-growing county that ranks among the top 2 percent statewide in terms of population growth over the next 2 years and provide service to clusters of tourism establishments and high-technology businesses. connector meets distance and economic connectivity criteria and is designated as merging facility. xisting onditions he connector is a 2.3-mile segment traversing 92 and Midway venue. and use along the connector is primarily retail and residential as shown in 1-2. V oute 9, 1, 11 and are operational on the connector. idewalks are present along 92 providing walk access from primarily retail facilities to fixed route V service. aily evel of ervice ( analysis for the segments of the connector was conducted using F Generalized/Quality evel of ervice tables and is summarized in able 1-1. t indicates that segment of 92 between illiamson oulevard and Midway venue is currently operating deficiently. he PM peak-hour intersection analysis conducted using YH is shown in able 1-2. t indicates that the intersection 92 at illiamson oulevard is operating deficiently. xisting intersection geometry including turn-radius, lane width, etc. is shown in s 1-3a through 1-3c. oad ame From o able 1-1: xisting aily rterial ection ength (mi rea ype Facility ype anes Year 27 2 (% Peak Hour irectional Volumes 92-9 amps illiamson.78 urban arterial 8,.28 2, 92 illiamson Midway ve. 1.11 urban arterial 9,.12 2,22 Midway ve. Midway ve. atalina r.. urban arterial,1 2.2 29 F td. Year 27 able 1-2: xisting PM Peak-Hour ntersection ntersection Planned/Programmed mprovements dopted 27 ntersection -9 off-ramp @ 92 92 @ ndigo r. 92@ hames d. 92 @ illiamson lvd. 92 @ Kennel lub 92@ Fentress lvd. 92 @ est uy 92 @ ndustrial Pkwy. 92 @ ill France lvd. 92 @ Midway ve. Midway ve.@ ichard Petty Midway ve.@ atalina r. F adopted FY28-213 ork Program includes resurfacing of 92 from.2 miles west of 1 to 83 (tem # 1991. Future onditions and ecommendations 1- shows the proposed and approved development projects in the immediate vicinity of the connector. able 1-3 provides summary of PM peak-hour intersection analysis for the years 22 and 23 for both no-build and build conditions. he recommendations for build conditions are listed in able 1- for phased implementation. ntersection able 1-3: Future PM Peak-Hour ntersection dopted 22 o-uild 22 uild 23 o-uild -9 off-ramp @ 92 92 @ ndigo r. 92 @ hames d. 92 @ illiamson lvd. F F 92 @ Kennel lub 92 @ Fentress lvd. 92 @ est uy 92 @ ndustrial Pkwy. 92 @ ill France lvd. 92 @ Midway ve. Midway ve.@ ichard Petty Midway ve. @ atalina r. 23 uild

trategic ntermodal ystem Highway s ssessment mprovement ategory Phase (mmediate mprovements able 1-: aytona each nternational irport ecommended mprovements 28 P osts** Phase (29-22 mprovements 28 P osts** Phase (221-23 mprovements Geometric* - - - - - - perational dd second right turn at illiamson lvd. *** $1,1, - - dd a second left turn lane at 92 and illiamson lvd. *** $19,2 dd a second left turn lane at 92 and illiamson lvd. *** $3,2 ther - - - - - - otal - $1,1, - - - $1,22, * ssume -2F design vehicle. ** osts of right-of-way, right-of-way support, landscaping, lighting, utility relocations and wetland mitigation are not included. *** hese recommended improvements are common for Greyhound us erminal and Greyhound aytona each 28 P osts**

V oadway : 7922 eginning MP: 1.23 nding MP: 1.97 Highway U V F H G. MY H aytona each ntl. irport Volusia tlantic cean F M * U: V 29 aytona each nternational irport PG U V F -9 11 us top* P G V Y M us oute & oute #* Y H M H 9 P Y -9 to 92 (nternational peedway lvd to Midway ve to ntrance aytona each ( 9-9 G ity imits. F FX 1-1 Miles Y 9 1.2 2 ( U V X merging Highway aytona each Greyhound us erminal X G aytona each ntl. irport verview V G 9 Y trategic ntermodal ystem ( Highway s ssessment MY 11 1 V oadway : 79 eginning MP: 1.2 nding MP: 18.122 V G H 1 1 8 V VU ( eminole Y V M PG PK V range F KG istrict 3-9 F K M KMM U istrict 2 istrict istrict 7 sceola revard -9 M istrict 1 istrict verview F istricts istrict MU

V U V M aytona each nternational irport -9 9 U 2 FF MP -9 F K M M 9 ( 92 MY H aytona each ntl. irport Volusia PG U V F tlantic cean F M P Y V Y M G P G V Y H -9-9 -9 to 92 (nternational peedway lvd to Midway ve to ntrance M H. Miles aytona each ( 9-9 P etland*. F FX.2 FM Floodplain* U V H Y9 2 ( X 9 ( M ity imits merging Highway aytona each Greyhound us erminal V P Highway X G F 1-2 Y K G aytona each ntl. irport xisting (Year 27 and Use G trategic ntermodal ystem ( Highway s ssessment Y P H G G H Y V M V V F M 9 ( Y PK F V 8 eminole Y V M PG PK V V VU ( range F KG istrict 3 xisting and Use* creage not zoned for agriculture gricultural * U: Florida Geographic ata ibrary (FG Mining etail / ffice ther -9 M entrally assessed Public / semi-public ndustrial ecreation Vacant / non-residential Vacant residential nstitutional esidential ater KMM U istrict 2 istrict istrict 7 sceola revard istrict 1 istrict verview F istricts istrict MU

trategic ntermodal ystem ( Highway s ssessment aytona each ntl. irport ntersection Geometry 1 2 3-9 @ 92 cale: 1 nch = 1 Feet Feet 92-9 MP 1 Feet 92-9 MP = 1 Feet 1-3a PY -9 92 FF MP 13 Feet 92-9 MP = Feet G 1 Feet = Feet PY = 8 Feet 9 = 11 Feet 1 Feet 17 Feet 1 Feet 17 Feet 1 Feet = 1 Feet M = 7 Feet = 8 Feet = Feet HM = Feet Feet 92 @ ndigo r. 92 @ hames d. = Feet PY 92 @ illiamson lvd. 92 @ aytona peedway ntrance PY PY

92 @ Midway lvd. = Feet = Feet 1 Feet 8 Feet 1 Feet 11 Feet PY = Feet = Feet MY V 92 @ Fentress lvd. 92 @ ndustrial Pkwy. PY = Feet F = 7 Feet = 3 Feet = 8 Feet 1 Feet 2 Feet 3 Feet Feet 9 Feet 8 Feet Feet 1 Feet = Feet = 3 Feet = Feet = Feet = Feet 1 Feet 3 Feet Feet = Feet = Feet = 3 Feet F 1 Feet 1 Feet = Feet = Feet = Feet PKY PY U 92 @ hopping enter 92 @ ill France lvd. trategic ntermodal ystem ( Highway s ssessment aytona each ntl. irport ntersection Geometry cale: 1 nch = 1 Feet 1 2 3 Feet 1-3b PY PY

MY V Midway lvd. @ ichard Petty lvd. Midway lvd. @ atalina r. trategic ntermodal ystem ( Highway s ssessment aytona each ntl. irport ntersection Geometry cale: 1 nch = 1 Feet 1-3c 1 2 3 Feet 11 Feet = Feet MY V 8 Feet 11 Feet 11 Feet H PY = 3 Feet 9 Feet = Feet = Feet 11 Feet

17 (JMM Y Y 1 M 8 3 G (G G ( V H aytona each nternational irport * U: F 29 2.1 MY H aytona each ntl. irport Volusia tlantic cean F PG eminole Y aytona each nt'l V irport U -9 K F M 1 ( 83 (Y M V V ( 8 V ( V M PG PK V range G 2( 7outh aytona KG istrict 3 M ( HY GY 9 1. P G V V Proposed * Y H ( pproved * Miles G 1 ( irport xecutive Park.7 1- ity imits merging Highway aytona each Greyhound us erminal Halifax Harbor Marina -9 M Highway Y H M ( aytona each ntl. irport s within Miles from V 2 Y9 Y P V (M trategic ntermodal ystem ( Highway s ssessment aytona each Greyhound us erminal aytona each 9 ( - dams Mark G M Y ( V M Port range - 3 V (M 3 H Y ( Y 3( 8-9 PG (M G HY V V ( 11 G 1 ( 3-9 Holy Hill V ( Y H -9 1 G P 9 ( 2 H 8 ( G ( P 9 1 8 ( 7 KMM U istrict 2 istrict istrict 7 sceola revard istrict 1 istrict verview F istricts istrict MU