Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008

Similar documents
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Serbia

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products: 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2018

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2014

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Verification of ECMWF products at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2013

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011

Application and verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

STATISTICAL MODELS and VERIFICATION

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Operations Portugal (second half of 2010)

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting

István Ihász, Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

Precipitation verification. Thanks to CMC, CPTEC, DWD, ECMWF, JMA, MF, NCEP, NRL, RHMC, UKMO

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2006

Forecasting Extreme Events

Allison Monarski, University of Maryland Masters Scholarly Paper, December 6, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Five years of limited-area ensemble activities at ARPA-SIM: the COSMO-LEPS system

Verification of different wind gust parametrizations Overview of verification results at MeteoSwiss in the year 2012

METinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models December 2017 to February 2018 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter

METinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models June to August 2017 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter

ECMWF products to represent, quantify and communicate forecast uncertainty

Model Output Statistics (MOS)

VALIDATION RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL LSA-SAF SNOW COVER MAPPING

Seasonal Forecast for the area of the east Mediterranean, Products and Perspectives

Verification of the operational NWP models at DWD - with special focus at COSMO-EU

Clustering Techniques and their applications at ECMWF

Complimentary assessment of forecast performance with climatological approaches

Spatial methods for assessing radar data assimilation performance at RHM: a framework

ECMWF 10 th workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems

István Ihász, Máté Mile and Zoltán Üveges Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

Experimental MOS Precipitation Type Guidance from the ECMWF Model

DROUGHT FORECASTING IN CROATIA USING STANDARDIZED PRECIPITATION INDEX (SPI)

Revisiting predictability of the strongest storms that have hit France over the past 32 years.

Severe weather warnings at the Hungarian Meteorological Service: Developments and progress

Optimal combination of NWP Model Forecasts for AutoWARN

Towards Operational Probabilistic Precipitation Forecast

Developing Operational MME Forecasts for Subseasonal Timescales

Current Status of COMS AMV in NMSC/KMA

Helen Titley and Rob Neal

Verification of precipitation forecasts by the DWD limited area model LME over Cyprus

15 day VarEPS introduced at. 28 November 2006

Calibrating forecasts of heavy precipitation in river catchments

The Impact of Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble Size on Probabilistic Forecasts of Precipitation by the ECMWF EPS

Developments towards multi-model based forecast product generation

Agrometeorological activities in RHMSS

Estimation of Forecat uncertainty with graphical products. Karyne Viard, Christian Viel, François Vinit, Jacques Richon, Nicole Girardot

Adaptation for global application of calibration and downscaling methods of medium range ensemble weather forecasts

Seasonal Predictions for South Caucasus and Armenia

MODELING PRECIPITATION OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN IN ICELAND

Main characteristics and performance of COSMO LEPS

ABSTRACT 3 RADIAL VELOCITY ASSIMILATION IN BJRUC 3.1 ASSIMILATION STRATEGY OF RADIAL

P3.1 Development of MOS Thunderstorm and Severe Thunderstorm Forecast Equations with Multiple Data Sources

EWGLAM/SRNWP National presentation from DMI

Exascale I/O challenges for Numerical Weather Prediction

Feature-specific verification of ensemble forecasts

Recent ECMWF Developments

4.3.2 Configuration. 4.3 Ensemble Prediction System Introduction

Current best practice of uncertainty forecast for wind energy

Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback

MAIN ATTRIBUTES OF THE PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS DEVELOPED BY THE HYDROLOGY SAF PROJECT RESULTS OF THE VALIDATION IN HUNGARY

NEW SCHEME TO IMPROVE THE DETECTION OF RAINY CLOUDS IN PUERTO RICO

A WRF-based rapid updating cycling forecast system of. BMB and its performance during the summer and Olympic. Games 2008

LAM-EPS activities in RC LACE

LAMEPS activities at the Hungarian Meteorological Service. Hungarian Meteorological Service

Calibration with MOS at DWD

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2016

The Hungarian Meteorological Service has made

Transcription:

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008 RHMS of Serbia 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are operationally used in Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia from the beginning of 2003. Deterministic forecast products are received via RMDCN in GRIB and BUFR form for 10 days forecast at different horizontal resolutions and several domains. Products are represented using MetView and are available on local web site. In addition, forecasters consult ECMWF web site, priory for EPS products and monthly forecast. From September 2006 seasonal forecast products are also used. 2. Use and application of products ECMWF products are used for short-range forecast for providing meteorological background for hail suppression activities, which is specialized part of Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia. Medium range forecast is mainly based on ECMWF products from deterministic model as well as EPS products available on ECMWF web site. Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia regularly issues monthly forecast for several places in Serbia. Statistical method by analogy is used together with EPS products from ECMWF. RHMS of Serbia has continued to use ECMWF s monthly forecasts as well as seasonal forecasts of prediction System 3. 2.1 Post-processing of model output 2.1.1 Statistical adaptation 2.1.2 Physical adaptation WRF-NMM, a non-hydrostatic limited-area model, has been running operationally since August 2007. Model uses ECMWF boundary conditions for 72 hours ahead. Some preliminary verification results compared with ECMWF forecast are presented in chapter 3.1.2. 2.1.3 Derived fields 2.2 Use of products Some of ECMWF forecast products, like CAPE and EFI are widely used in every day work. Wind gusts and 2m minimum and maximum daily temperature forecast are especially important for road maintenance requirements. First steps in using 10 days deterministic forecast of 2m maximum daily temperature for heat wave prediction are made. We are testing several criteria in definition and prediction of heat waves. Plan is to include EPS products in prediction of heat waves and other severe weather events. 1

3. Verification of products 3.1 Objective verification 3.1.1 Direct ECMWF model output (both deterministic and EPS) The 00 UTC run of ECMWF deterministic forecast is verified against SYNOP observations. Input forecast values for ECMWF were taken from 0.5 x0.5 grid, using grid points closest to chosen synoptic stations. The verification is carried out for nine synoptic stations (Fig 1.). Verified parameters are 2m minimum temperature (between 18 and 06 UTC). 2m maximum temperature (between 06 and 18 UTC). daily accumulated amount of precipitation (between 06 and 06 UTC). 24h precipitation existence with various thresholds (between 06 and 06 UTC). Fig.1 Location of verification synoptic stations used in In general, basic statistical scores (ME, MAE and RMSE) for 2m minimum and maximum temperature forecast do not show significant differences compared to last year. The benchmark forecast used in mean absolute error skill score calculation is climatology, prepared on a 23-year sample (1983-2005). Daily climate values are obtained averaging values from ±13 day vicinity of the actual day. Values of skill score (MAE) for 2m minimum and maximum temperature forecast during 2006 and 2007, Beograd- Kara or ev park, are presented in Fig. 2. Higher values are reached for maximum temperature. Seasonal variation of the skill score for 2m minimum and maximum temperature forecast is shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. Plots show that minimum temperature skill is highest in the summer and maximum temperature skill was the best during two last winters. Fig.2 The mean absolute error skill score for 2m minimum and maximum temperature forecast for Beograd. 2

Fig.3 The mean absolute error skill score for 2m minimum temperature forecast for Beograd. Fig.4 The mean absolute error skill score for 2m maximum temperature forecast for Beograd. 3

Precipitation forecast is verified as categorical (precipitation existence) and continuous (daily accumulated) variable. According to verification results averaged over nine stations, larger amounts of 24h precipitation are underestimated and smaller amounts are overestimated. Precipitation forecast is unbiased for threshold close to 2mm/24h (Fig. 5, a) and b)). Heidke Skill Score approaches zero skill after approximately 8 days for threshold of 20mm/24h (Fig 5, c) and d)). a) b) c) d) Fig.5 Verification of 24h precipitation existence forecast averaged over nine stations: FBI (a) and b)) and HSS (c) and)) for different thresholds and forecast ranges. Examples of 24h accumulated precipitation forecast verification for three locations are presented in Figure 6 (a), b) and c)). Underestimation of larger amounts of precipitation can be obtained in scatterplots and forecast errors versus observations plots. 4

a) b) c) Fig.6 Scatterplots, forecast errors versus observations and statistical scores for the 24h accumulated precipitation forecast for a) Beograd (13274), b) Negotin (13295) and c) Zlatibor (13367). 5

3.1.2 ECMWF model output compared to other NWP models Comparison of ECMWF model and WRF-NMM model has been made only for 2m minimum and maximum temperature forecast during winter 2007/2008. 00 UTC runs were considered. The verification results are presented in Figure 7. a) b) c) d) Fig.7 Mean error and mean absolute error of 2m minimum and maximum temperature forecast during winter 2007/2008. 6

For most of locations ECMWF model forecast underestimates while NMM overestimates values of 2m minimum and maximum temperature during last winter. Exceptions are mountain regions in southwest and south part of the country. Results that are more representative will be available after at least one-year forecast data verification. 3.1.3 Post-processed products 3.1.4 End products delivered to users 3.2 Subjective verification There is no subjective verification. 3.2.1 Subjective scores (including evaluation of confidence indices when available) 3.2.2 Synoptic studies 4. References to relevant publications http://www.ecmwf.int/products/greenbook Annual Report on application and verification of ECMWF products in Member and Co-operating States 7