Effects of Utilizing Liquids In a Pre-mix Application Method. Gerald Peterson Manager Manistee County Road Commission, MI

Similar documents
Plows Truck Drivers. tations. Winter Maintenance Report. 30,546 Lane Miles 87% 174,000 40,000. Total Cost of Winter $ Million

Winter Roads Maintenance

Winter Maintenance Report

Why Now is the Time to Use Organic-Based Performance Enhancers to Treat Winter Roads Purdue Road School

Drivers % Winter Maintenance Report 30,517 46, , Statewide Snowfall Average. Truck Stations. Full-time Backup.

17 th Annual Snow & Ice Symposium Columbus, OH. Snow & Ice Management Association Copyright 2014 SALT BRINE & SNOW AND ICE CONTROL.

Town of Oconomowoc Snow & Ice Control Policy

10 th Annual Road Salt Symposium. Thursday, February 3, 2011

Snow Measurement Guidelines for National Weather Service Snow Spotters

Materials in Snow and Ice Control MATERIALS. Winter Maintenance Materials 1/9/2015. OTA Winter Conference 2014

INVISIBLE WATER COSTS

Winter Maintenance on Ontario s Highways

John A. Carlson Snow and Ice Removal

Educational Objectives

Salt Reduction using Innovative

What we are trying to accomplish during the winter season

Denver International Airport MDSS Demonstration Verification Report for the Season

Deicing Chemicals - State of Practice

Establishing Winter Standard Operating Procedures

Champaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary

MTO s Road Weather Information System (RWIS)

IWT Scenario 2 Integrated Warning Team Workshop National Weather Service Albany, NY October 31, 2014

Denver International Airport MDSS Demonstration Verification Report for the Season

LOWER SAUCON TOWNSHIP

1. Major streets, Central Business District (CBD) and school bus routes. 2. Local streets 3. Downtown parking lots

Traffic Control Weather Policy

What s New in the World of Winter Maintenance Technology. Laser Road Surface Sensor (LRSS) Functional Description

Severe Weather Watches, Advisories & Warnings

Evaluation of Epoke Bulk Spreader for Winter Maintenance

Weekly Weather. Europe. February Flash. This Week: Warm East and Cold West; Heavy Rain and Snow in Some Areas

2018 Year in Review for Central and Southeast Illinois By: Chris Geelhart, Meteorologist National Weather Service, Lincoln IL

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

WAKING UP TO NEW STRATEGIES FOR SNOW AND ICE CONTROL

Motorists are urged to drive wisely and cautiously in all winter weather situations:

City of Saginaw Right of Way Division Snow and Ice Removal Policy January 18, 2016

Snow Response in an Urban Setting

Winter. Here s what a weak La Nina usually brings to the nation with tempseraures:

Commercial Salt Applicator Certification

Temp 54 Dew Point 41 Relative Humidity 63%

A Guideline for Training Patrol Staff Ontario Good Roads Association

Using Winter Severity Indices for Winter Maintenance Performance Management. TRB Winter Maintenance Committee AHD65

A Prepared Marylander Creates a Resilient Maryland

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

SNOW & ICE CONTROL Winter Operations Conference. October 18, 2017 Renae Kuehl, SRF Consulting Group

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

Here s what a weak El Nino usually brings to the nation with temperatures:

Local Climate Change Impacts for Central Illinois

Evaluation of NDDOT Fixed Automated Spray Technology (FAST) Systems November 24, 2009

Extreme Weather and Climate Change: the big picture Alan K. Betts Atmospheric Research Pittsford, VT NESC, Saratoga, NY

Pacific Decadal Oscillation ( PDO ):

Snow and Ice. All Hazards Emergency Response and Continuity of Operations Plan. For Official Use Only

CLIMATE. UNIT TWO March 2019

Seasonal Hazard Outlook

CITY OF BEAVER DAM SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICY

Coastal Storm this Weekend

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY April 2017

CITY OF EAST PEORIA SNOW AND ICE CONTROL PROGRAM INTRODUCTION

1st Annual Southwest Ohio Snow Conference April 8, 2010 Abner F. Johnson, Office of Maintenance - RWIS Coordinator

ROAD PAVEMENT TEMPERATURES AND THEIR IMPACT ON TRAVEL DURING SNOW STORMS. Donald M. Moore, NOAA/NWS, Billings, MT; and R. J.

PREDICTING SURFACE TEMPERATURES OF ROADS: Utilizing a Decaying Average in Forecasting

but 2012 was dry Most farmers pulled in a crop

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

January 2006 Climate Summary

Length is the distance from one point to another. Length has standard units of measurement such as inches or centimeters.

Understanding Michigan snowfall. Jim Keysor - NWS Gaylord

TOWN OF GRAND FALLS WINDSOR

Planed treatment recommendations

Weekly Weather Flash. January 22 February 4. US This Week: Cold Weather Continues in the West; Storm Brings Rain to the East Coast

Arizona Climate Summary

Lake Tahoe Watershed Model. Lessons Learned through the Model Development Process

Arizona Climate Summary February 2018 Summary of conditions for January 2018

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System February 12, 2019

Unit: Weather Study Guide

Schedule C By-Law Snow and Ice Control Services - Project Specifications for Various Parking Lots

Deicing (Winter Operations) on Porous and Permeable Pavements. Laura Fay October 27, 2016

Name Class Date. 3. In what part of the water cycle do clouds form? a. precipitation b. evaporation c. condensation d. runoff

2. Can you describe how temperature and dissolved solids changes the density of water?

Goals of Presentation

UDOT Weather Program Traffic Operations Center

Colorado CoCoRaHS. Colorado CoCoRaHS. December 2013 Volume 1, Issue 8 NOVEMBER PRECIPITATION NOVEMBER TEMPERATURES

Chapter 5: Weather. Only Section 1: What is Weather?

Minnesota s Changing Climate: Winter Impacts

Weekly Weather Flash. Europe. February 19 March 4. This Week: A Warm End to February; Heavy Rain in the West

Chapter 2: Physical Geography

IWT Scenario 1 Integrated Warning Team Workshop National Weather Service Albany, NY October 31, 2014

The Pennsylvania Observer

The Pennsylvania Observer

The Pennsylvania Observer

Deicing of Roads in Norway with Brine

1 City of Edmonton Quesnell Bridge, Roads and Associated Structures Assessment

Dunn County Snow Removal Policy

WINTER MAINTENANCE TRAINING VINCE LOMBARDI

Arizona Climate Summary

Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary

Steven Chien Kung-E Cheng New Jersey Institute of Technology. David Bowlby New Jersey Department of Transportation

The Pennsylvania Observer

ARE HUGE NORTHEAST SNOW STORMS DUE TO GLOBAL WARMING? by Dr. Richard Keen

LESSON Setting the Stage Introduce students to the case study goals and Sujay Kaushal, the scientist who conducted the research.

Electronic Station Data Definitions

Road Weather: The Science Behind What You Know

Transcription:

Effects of Utilizing Liquids In a Pre-mix Application Method Gerald Peterson Manager Manistee County Road Commission, MI

Background The Manistee County Road Commission has been tracking winter costs for (5) years. Tracking snowfall amounts, type of precipitation and air temperature. We have found that not just one product or material is the fix all it takes several. Climate, air temperature, time of year and traffic play a huge roll in product use. Driver training is more critical than any product.

Five-Year Comparison Study 2007 Calcium Chloride 2008 Geo-Melt / Ice Bite 2009 Boost 2010 Ice Bite being used 2011 Ice Bite and Calc. Chloride

Note: Boost saw no decrease in application rate re-freeze & hardpack evident. Ice-bite saw a decrease in application rate after 3-4 applications little to no hard-pack.

M55 Day 1 13 degrees 300# M115 Day 1 3 degrees 300#

M55 Last Day 14 degrees 450# M115 Last Day 12 degrees 200#

Recommendations In Early Winter / Late Spring: Use pure salt method or 50/50 with calcium chloride mix to reduce bounce & scatter. Pure salt on high dew point days, 50/50 otherwise. In Colder Winter Temperatures & Steady Snowfall: Pure salt with beet juice (or 50/50 mix when freezing rain or ice is present). Temperatures at 20 degrees or colder. Keep In Mind! All Drivers Should Be Trained In: The specific liquid being used How the materials work How fast the materials work in specific conditions

COUNTY WINTER MATERIAL ANALYSES SEASON CSALT TONS 467-14 467-13 467-12 467-11 467-10 467-09 467-08 467-07 467-06 467-05 467-04 467-03 467-02 467-01 TOTAL TOTAL AVE SALT COST TOTAL COST YE SNOW COST 467-18 467-17 467-16 467-15 497-14 497-13 497-12 497-11 497-10 497-09 497-08 497-07 497-06 497-05 497-04 497-03 497-02 497-01 QTY COST PER TON CNTY MTRLS TOTALS PER INCH 2005-2006 382.00 552.00 618.00 456.00 194.00 142.00 132.00 14.00 28.00 237.00 195.00 201.00 6.00 8.00 34.00 3,199.00 82,712.74 25.86 107,322.74 137 783 2006-2007 371.00 602.00 486.00 375.00 239.00 154.00 100.00 33.00 43.00 249.00 254.00 191.00 23.00 20.00 41.00 34.00 23.00 17.00 3,255.00 117,490.09 36.10 136,474.03 146 935 2007-2008 309.00 359.00 486.00 202.00 267.00 173.00 98.00 43.00 24.00 210.00 237.00 267.00 12.00 1.00 18.00 48.00 10.00 14.00 2,778.00 105,955.47 38.14 153,219.61 148 1,035 2008-2009 425.75 382.00 441.25 339.00 263.50 160.75 86.50 9.00 13.25 241.25 187.25 189.50 8.75 1.50 4.00 31.50 10.00 15.75 2,810.50 126,554.07 45.03 152,436.14 191 798 2009-2010 336.25 254.75 318.75 357.75 202.75 274.75 123.00 10.00 22.25 239.25 172.25 318.25 9.00 3.00 10.25 19.50 25.00 2,696.75 146,137.32 54.19 183,228.93 84 2,181 2010-2011 551.00 347.00 467.00 413.00 203.00 173.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 169.00 196.00 190.00 2.00 9.00 0.00 21.00 12.00 17.00 2,867.00 165,368.96 57.68 191,747.33 146 1,313 TOTALS 2,375.00 2,496.75 2,817.00 2,142.75 1,369.25 1,077.50 633.50 111.00 131.50 1,345.50 1,241.50 1,356.75 60.75 34.50 71.00 178.75 74.50 88.75 924,428.78 CSAND - YDS 467-14 467-13 467-12 467-11 467-10 467-09 467-08 467-07 467-06 467-05 467-04 467-03 467-02 467-01 AVE SALT COST TOTAL COST TOTAL COST 467-18 467-17 467-16 467-15 497-14 497-13 497-12 497-11 497-10 497-09 497-08 497-07 497-06 497-05 497-04 497-03 497-02 497-01 PER CYD SALT/SAND W / LIQUIDS 2005-2006 484.00 696.00 783.00 562.00 225.00 238.00 239.00 111.00 90.00 300.00 326.00 319.00 59.00 132.00 108.00 141.00 48.00 61.00 4,922.00 24,610.00 5.00 107,322.74 107,322.74 2006-2007 249 364 296 168 131 86 62 32 24 164 158 133 17 25 26 34 10 10 1,989.00 18,983.94 9.54 136,474.03 136,474.03 2007-2008 303.00 359.00 462.00 200.00 191.00 191.00 147.00 89.00 80.00 238.00 233.00 306.00 116.00 64.00 89.00 86.00 41.00 66.00 3,261.00 33,653.52 10.32 139,608.99 153,219.61 2008-2009 316.00 294.50 347.00 60.50 31.00 99.00 89.00 46.00 57.00 189.00 152.25 178.50 44.00 31.00 29.50 53.50 63.00 55.50 2,136.25 22,046.10 10.32 148,600.17 152,436.14 2009-2010 240.50 183.00 183.00 45.50 19.25 105.50 81.00 37.50 53.00 146.75 144.00 209.50 67.00 28.00 28.00 37.00 37.50 35.00 1,681.00 17,347.92 10.32 163,485.24 183,228.93 2010-2011 480.00 320.00 423.00 70.00 26.00 48.00 91.00 2.00 17.00 148.00 174.00 165.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 16.00 8.00 11.00 2,017.00 20,815.44 10.32 186,184.40 191,747.33 TOTALS 2,072.50 2,216.50 2,494.00 1,106.00 623.25 767.50 709.00 317.50 321.00 1,185.75 1,187.25 1,311.00 312.00 289.00 280.50 367.50 207.50 238.50 CALCHLRD - GAL (BOOST) 467-14 467-13 467-12 467-11 467-10 467-09 467-08 467-07 467-06 467-05 467-04 467-03 467-02 467-01 AVE SALT COST 467-18 467-17 467-16 467-15 497-14 497-13 497-12 497-11 497-10 497-09 497-08 497-07 497-06 497-05 497-04 497-03 497-02 497-01 PER GAL 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 685.50 526.50 664.50 669.00 495.00 162.00 150.00 7.50 22.50 285.00 223.50 258.00 42.00 4,191.00 3,730.21 0.89 2009-2010 2010-2011 315.00 81.00 144.00 81.00 270.00 261.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,278.00 257.85 0.20 TOTALS 1,000.50 607.50 808.50 750.00 765.00 423.00 150.00 7.50 22.50 285.00 223.50 384.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 0.00 ICEBITE - GAL (GEOMELT) 467-14 467-13 467-12 467-11 467-10 467-09 467-08 467-07 467-06 467-05 467-04 467-03 467-02 467-01 AVE SALT COST 467-18 467-17 467-16 467-15 497-14 497-13 497-12 497-11 497-10 497-09 497-08 497-07 497-06 497-05 497-04 497-03 497-02 497-01 PER GAL 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 637.80 774.20 1,006.90 419.90 549.80 359.60 208.80 90.40 51.40 428.20 481.30 563.60 34.60 2.20 38.20 98.60 22.00 24.20 5,791.70 13,610.62 2.35 2008-2009 45.00 45.00 105.76 2.35 2009-2010 925.00 731.00 825.00 988.00 568.00 835.00 344.00 27.00 44.00 619.00 599.00 918.00 36.00 12.00 36.00 75.00 95.00 7,677.00 19,743.69 2.57 2010-2011 516.00 174.00 348.00 726.00 390.00 342.00 90.00 0.00 6.00 108.00 144.00 108.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 24.00 3,012.00 5,305.08 1.76 TOTALS 2,078.80 1,679.20 2,179.90 2,178.90 1,507.80 1,536.60 642.80 117.40 101.40 1,155.20 1,224.30 1,589.60 82.60 14.20 38.20 146.60 109.00 143.20 924,428.78

NOTHING SUGAR BEET BOOST ICE_BITE WET SALT COMBO as of 1-21-09 as of 2-18-10 as of 1-24-11 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 $ 329,810.00 $ 262,279.00 $ 303,864.00 $ 313,761.00 399746 avg temp. 20.56522 18.79661 20.40984 23.34091 21.69231 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Winter weather findings to date: As you can see from my attached spreadsheets, the Road Commission in 2007 used no pile treatment and the net result was $8,203.17 per event on county primary roads, with average temperatures during events at 20.6 degrees. We utilized 3,000 tons of salt that season as well. In 2008 the Road Commission used Ice-Bite mixed at 6 gallons per ton preseason pile treatment as directed and realized a net result of $6,329.16 per event, with average temperatures at 18.8 degrees. We utilized 2,272 tons of salt that year which is a 25% reduction from 2007 season. It needs to also be noted that in 2008 the Road Commission net increase of fringe benefits and payroll (due to raises) was up approximately 5%, but we still recognized a $1,874.01 per event savings. We then switched products in 2009 season to Boost, as recommended by MDOT and pile treated exactly the same way we did in 2008. The net result as of 1-21- 09 is $6,899.05 per event, or $569.89 increase per event from last year, with average temperatures during events at 20.4 degrees, we also utilized 2,363 tons of salt that year as well. It must also be noted that the Road Commission did not give pay raises and also recognized a decrease in fringe benefits due to the change of health care providers, this adds up to approximately a 2% decrease in fringe benefits. We did a side by side comparison mid winter with Boost on M55 and Ice Bite on M115 for one week, the results at the end of the week were very clear. M55 was getting 450 pounds of salt per lane mile applied still and had hard pack on it, while M115 was down to 250 pounds per lane mile as was relatively clear of all snow. We then switched back to Ice-Bite in 2010 to see if we could recognize the same results as was shown in 2008. The salt from the dock was delivered to us with an extreme amount of water from heavy rains prior. We struggled to get just 4 gallons of Ice Bite into the salt without it running out of the salt. The entire season was difficult due to the wet salt. We ended the season with a net increase per event from our 2008 Ice Bite year of $1,150, with average temperatures per event at 23.34 degrees. We also utilized 2,243 tons of salt that year as well. There were also other factors that contributed to the increase such as pay increases and fringe benefit increases which contributed to a 2% overall wage and fringe benefit increase. 2011 Season it was decided to try a combination of Ice Bite (at 6 gallons per ton) or Calcium Chloride at 26% chlorides (at 9 gallons per ton). We did not pile treat preseason, rather treated small piles one week in advance. We did not create any pile with calcium chloride, only treated the loads as we loaded. We ended up using 2,700 gallons of Ice Bite and the same in calcium chloride and a lot of days no treatment was utilized at all. The net result was an increase of 50% from 2008 and also and increase in per event cost of $3,220, with an average temperature per event of 21.7 degrees. We utilized 3,253 tons of salt as well. There are two factors that must be noted however that the 2011 season was mostly weekend snow events and was coupled with extreme wind events that added to the need for salt and blading even during non event days. And we also recognized a 2% increase in wages and fringe benefits this year as well. I believe these would account for approximately 50% of the increase, but the other 50% is due to lack of pile treatment and liquids in the salt.

QUESTIONS???