Evaluation of NDDOT Fixed Automated Spray Technology (FAST) Systems November 24, 2009

Similar documents
VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Educational Objectives

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

Center for Transportation Research and Education. Winter Maintenance Operations & Maintenance Decision Support System TRANS 691 Seminar March 5, 2004

APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA

Winter Maintenance on Ontario s Highways

The Climate of Pontotoc County

MDSS and Advanced Forecasting STSMO Weather Workshop Dave Huft, SDDOT Research Program Manager September 12, 2017

Champaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary

The Climate of Grady County

The Climate of Marshall County

Three main areas of work:

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Responsive Traffic Management Through Short-Term Weather and Collision Prediction

The Climate of Payne County

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Seminole County

The Climate of Bryan County

Wind Resource Data Summary Cotal Area, Guam Data Summary and Transmittal for December 2011

The Climate of Texas County

Winter Plowing and Deicing: Saving Money, Salt and Labor by Distinguishing Best Practices From Urban Legends. Stephen J. Druschel, PhD, PE, F.

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

Bridge Prioritization for Installation of Automatic Anti-icing Systems in Nebraska

Transportation and Road Weather

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Jin Guk Kim Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology KICT, South Korea January 21, 2016

1999 Day Precip Comments 2000 Day Precip Comments 2000 Day Precip Comments July January

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Pooled- Fund Maintenance Decision Support System: Case Study

APWA Public Works Expo August 29 th, 2016

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Engineering Services Division Technical Memorandum No MAT-02 October 7, 2014

The Climate of Murray County

Quality Pavement Markings

Ice Hazard Mitigation and Monitoring on the Veterans Glass City Skyway Bridge

Review of Policies Spring Road Restrictions (SRR), and Winter Seasonal Weights (WSW)... MCCC Meeting November 16, 2016

A Guideline for Training Patrol Staff Ontario Good Roads Association

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

CHAPTER-11 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL

The Climate of Haskell County

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

10/18/2016 The Hoosier Co. Inc W. 86th Street, Indianapolis, IN

Current Climate Trends and Implications

Road Weather Management Program

Drivers % Winter Maintenance Report 30,517 46, , Statewide Snowfall Average. Truck Stations. Full-time Backup.

10/18/2016 The Hoosier Co. Inc W. 86th Street, Indianapolis, IN

Flood and emergency preparedness CARNATION DUVALL CITIZEN CORPS DUVALL KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 45 SEPTEMBER 11, 2018

ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVICE TESTING LEVEL C

Drought Monitoring in Mainland Portugal

SNOW & ICE CONTROL Winter Operations Conference. October 18, 2017 Renae Kuehl, SRF Consulting Group

The Pavement Precipitation Accumulation Estimation System (PPAES)

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary

Road Surface Condition Analysis from Web Camera Images and Weather data. Torgeir Vaa (SVV), Terje Moen (SINTEF), Junyong You (CMR), Jeremy Cook (CMR)

Operational Evaluation Report

A Preliminary Severe Winter Storms Climatology for Missouri from

Weather and Travel Time Decision Support

MTO s Road Weather Information System (RWIS)

Drought Characterization. Examination of Extreme Precipitation Events

TMC Monthly Operational Summary

Evaluation of Road Weather Information System: Interim Report

Plows Truck Drivers. tations. Winter Maintenance Report. 30,546 Lane Miles 87% 174,000 40,000. Total Cost of Winter $ Million

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

CHARACTERISTICS OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN COLD, SNOWY HOKKAIDO, JAPAN

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Causes of high PM 10 values measured in Denmark in 2006

Jessica M. Rathke* and Renee A. McPherson Oklahoma Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 2. DATA. 2.1.

Using Winter Severity Indices for Winter Maintenance Performance Management. TRB Winter Maintenance Committee AHD65

2015 Fall Conditions Report

November 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

The importance of long-term Arctic weather station data for setting the research stage for climate change studies

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado

A summary of the weather year based on data from the Zumwalt weather station

Sierra Weather and Climate Update

2014 Annual Mitigation Plan Review Meeting

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director

Session 6: and Evaluation. M c Farland Management, LLC

Road Weather: The Science Behind What You Know

Significant Rainfall and Peak Sustained Wind Estimates For Downtown San Francisco

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP,

Federal Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) Prototype Update

P7.7 A CLIMATOLOGICAL STUDY OF CLOUD TO GROUND LIGHTNING STRIKES IN THE VICINITY OF KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA

17 th Annual Snow & Ice Symposium Columbus, OH. Snow & Ice Management Association Copyright 2014 SALT BRINE & SNOW AND ICE CONTROL.

Lab Activity: Climate Variables

Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois

What s New in the World of Winter Maintenance Technology. Laser Road Surface Sensor (LRSS) Functional Description

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau

1st Annual Southwest Ohio Snow Conference April 8, 2010 Abner F. Johnson, Office of Maintenance - RWIS Coordinator

Country Presentation-Nepal

TMC Monthly Operational Summary

Transcription:

Evaluation of NDDOT Fixed Automated Spray Technology (FAST) Systems November 4, 009 Shawn Birst, PE Program Director, ATAC Associate Research Fellow Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University

Outline Introduction and Objectives System Description and Overview System Performance Case Studies Crash Data Analysis Benefit/Cost Summary

Introduction/Objectives Bridge decks are susceptible to frost and ice FAST systems can mitigate these conditions by automatically treating the road surface NDDOT has FAST systems (FreezeFree) I-9 Buxton Bridge I-94 Red River Bridge Objectives Describe how FAST systems work Discuss how the FAST systems perform Analyze benefit/cost for future installations

Winter Weather Conditions (Fargo) Month Total Precip. (in.) Total Snow Fall (in.) Number of Days Low Temp. 3º F September.3 0.0 (4.3%) October.9 0.7 3 (4.5%) November 0.9 7.5 7 (88.8%) December 0.7 8.6 3 (99.6%) January 0.7. 3 (99.9%) February 0.6 7. 8 (98.7%) March. 8.5 7 (86.7%) April.3.6 6 (53.7%) May.8 0.0 3 (9.%) Monthly (Oct-Apr).0 6.6 5 (8.%) Monthly (Oct-Mar).0 7. 6 (85.9%) Monthly (Nov-Mar) 0.8 8.6 9 (94.4%) Monthly (Nov-Apr) 0.9 7.6 7 (87.5%)

FAST System Components Pavement sensors Passive, provide: Pavement temperature & condition (dry or wet) If wet, freeze point estimation based on conductivity Active, provide: Pavement temperature & condition (dry or wet) If wet, freeze point determination by cooling a sample of the liquid on the road surface (Peltier element)

FAST System Components Weather sensors/environmental Sensing Station (ESS) Temperature and dew point Precipitation type and rate Wind speed Power/communication Pump system Pumps, plumbing, and spray nozzles Storage tank with anti-icing chemical Power/communication Computer controller

FAST Systems Operation Remote processing unit (RPU) at the ESS receives Pavement temp. and freeze pt. data (pavement sensors) Atmospheric information from the ESS Spray algorithms for various conditions Frost: pavement temp., dew point Freeze: pavement temp., liquid freeze point Precipitation: pavement temp., rate of precip. If conditions are met and wind speed is less than threshold: The ESS RPU sends spray command to the FAST RPU The FAST system cycles through the spray nozzles Pumps re-pressurize the system after spray cycle

Spray Algorithms

Buxton Bridge FAST Overview Bridge Near Buxton, ND on I-9 Two structures, 330 ft ea. Two lanes per direction ADT of ~K (007) FAST system Installed in 00, operational December Total cost ESS = $68,000 Treats 370 ft (bridge + 40 ft of roadway) per bridge 0 spray nozzles (0 for each direction)

Buxton Bridge FAST System

Red River Bridge FAST - Overview Bridge Spans Red River on I-94 Single structure,,300 ft Three lanes per direction ADT of ~63K (007) FAST system Installed in 005 with Mn/DOT, operational Jan 006 Total cost ESS = $650,575 (NDDOT) Treats,300 ft of bridge deck + (00 ft roadway ND, 800 ft roadway MN) Spray nozzles: 30 ND and 4 MN Dual closed-loop system

Red River Bridge FAST System

Buxton Bridge Level of Use Winter 007 FAST Applications Spray Application Event Frequency Days with Spray Applications 0 Days with Frost and Freeze Conditions 4 Total Sprays 0 Manual Sprays Failed Sprays 6 Winter 007 Application by Condition Spray Condition # of Days Total Sprays Sprays/ Day Frost 64 99.5 Freeze 6 0.8 Number of Sprays/Day 3 4 5 38 (59%) 35 (56%) 8 (8%) 4 (3%) 7 (%) 6 (0%) (%) 6 (0%) - (%)

Red River Bridge Level of Use Winter 007 FAST Applications Spray Application Event Frequency Days with Spray Applications 67 Days with Frost and Freeze Conditions 3 Days with Frost and Precipitation Conditions 9 Days with Freeze and Precipitation Conditions Days with Frost, Freeze and Precipitation Conditions 7 Total Sprays 69 Manual Sprays 4 Failed Sprays 8 Winter 007 FAST Application by Condition Spray Condition # of Days Total Sprays Sprays/ Day Frost 64 7.0 Freeze 38 88.3 Precipitation 5 50 3.3 Number of Sprays / Day 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 4 5 0 (38%) (39%) (6%) 9 6 4 (50%) (6%) (%) 7 4 (47%) (7%) (3%) 5 (3%) 3 (5%) (5%) - - - - - - (3%) - - - - - (3%) (3%) - - (7%) (7%)

Frost Event: Buxton Bridge

Frost Event: Buxton Bridge Date Time (CST) 04/05/09 3:43 04/05/09 3:58 04/06/09 0:8 04/06/09 06:8 04/06/09 06:34 Status Atmospheric Conditions Surface Temp Dew Point Wind Speed Inactive - critical conditions not detected 3.7F.9F 9 mph Sprayer not activated since the wind speed of 7 mph exceeds the maximum wind speed threshold of 5 mph. Sprayer activated due to a frost condition. The surface temperature of.0f is within.8 or lower of the dew point of.3f. 3.F.8F 7 mph.0f.3f 4 mph Inactive due to frost hold off time 9.4F.7F 5 mph Sprayer activated due to a frost condition. The surface temperature of 9.4F is within.8 or lower of the dew point of.6f. 9.4F.6F 4 mph Scan Web Data: Buxton Bridge Frost Event (8:00 am, 4/5/009 to 8:00 am, 4/6/009)

Rain/ Snow Event: Red River Bridge

Rain/Snow Event: Red River Bridge Date Time (CST) 0/08-08:3 0/08-7:53 0/08 - :55 Status Sprayer activated due to a frost condition. The surface temperature of.f is within.8 or lower of the dew point of.6f. Sprayer activated due to a frost condition. The surface temperature of 8.8F is within.8 or lower of the dew point of 7.F. Sprayer activated due to a frost condition. The surface temperature of 9.3F is within.8 or lower of the dew point of 30.4F. Atmospheric Conditions Surface Temp Dew Point Precip Wind Speed.F.6F None 4 mph 8.8F 7.F None 6 mph 9.3F 30.4F None 4 mph 0/09-00:07 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 3.5F 3.4F Rain 4 mph 0/09-0:30 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 3.3F 3.F Rain Calm 0/09-04:8 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 3.5F 33.4F Rain 5 mph 0/09-05:30 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 3.7F 34.0F Rain 4 mph 0/ - 04:43 Sprayer activated due to a frost condition. The surface temperature of 3.9F is within.8 or lower of the dew point of 3.5F. 3.9F 3.5F Unid 6 mph 0/ - 07:39 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 3.7F 3.5F Unid Calm 0/ - 8:3 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 3.5F 6.8F Unid 6 mph 0/ - :08 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 7.3F 5.F Unid 6 mph 0/ - : Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 7.F 5.0F Unid 4 mph 0/ - 3:6 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 6.F 4.6F Unid 4 mph 0/ - 00:9 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 4.8F 3.7F Unid 5 mph 0/ - 03:4 Active due to rain and wet surface conditions 4.4F 0.8F Unid 4 mph Scan Web Data: Red River Bridge - Feb 7, 009 (noon) to Feb 3, 009 (noon)

Fargo District Perspectives ~95% reliable (communication problems) Perform well for frost and freeze conditions Vendor support is important initially System limitations: system will not spray when Wind speed is greater than 5 mph Surface temperature is below o F Anti-icing chemical (CF7) performs well Deicing/anti-icing properties Minimal environmental impacts Non-corrosive properties

Crash Analysis Crash data from the NDDOT and Mn/DOT October 996 June 008 ( winters) Filtered crash data Removed deer/debris, catch on fire, tire failure, nonwinter, etc. Buxton Bridge 6.5 winter seasons before and 5.5 after Red River Bridge 9.5 winter seasons before and.5 after

Buxton Bridge Crashes 0 9 8 I-9 Buxton Bridge Winter Season Crash Summary Injury 4 Propery Damage Number of Crashes 7 6 5 4 3 0 7 6 6 6 5 4 3 3 0 996 997 998 999 000 00 00 003 004 005 006 007 Winter Season

Buxton Bridge Crashes Buxton Bridge Crash Data Crash Scenario Winter Seasons Total Crashes Total Crashes PD Crashes Injury Crashes Before FAST 6.5 40 6. 4.8. After FAST 5.5 4.5. 0.4 Change in Crashes with FAST -59% -54% -70% Buxton Bridge Crash Data Normalized for AADT Crash Scenario Before FAST AADT/Crash Scenario Annual Traffic Volume Total Crashes/ Annual Volume x 0 6 Property Crashes/ Annual Volume x 0 6 Injury Crashes/Annual Volume x 0 6 9,93 3,39,965.8.4 0.36 After FAST,77 4,079,686 0.6 0.53 0.09 Change in Crashes with FAST -66% -6% -75%

Red River Bridge Crashes ND 0 I-94 Red River Bridge Winter Season Crash Summary (North Dakota) Injury Property Damage Number of Crashes 8 6 4 0 9 9 8 6 5 4 4 3 996 997 998 999 000 00 00 003 004 005 006 007 Winter Season

Red River Bridge Crashes ND Red River Bridge Crash Data ND Crash Scenario Winter Seasons Total Crashes Total Crashes PD Crashes Injury Crashes Before FAST 9.5 58 6. 4.8.3 After FAST.5 8 3. 3. 0.0 Change in Crashes with FAST -48% -34% -00% Red River Bridge Crash Data Normalized for AADT ND Crash Scenario AADT/Crash Scenario Annual Traffic Volume Total Crashes/ Annual Volume x 0 6 PD Crashes/ Annual Volume x 0 6 Injury Crashes/ Annual Volume x 0 6 Before FAST 53,50 9,534,800 0.3 0.5 0.06 After FAST 6,37,745,705 0.4 0.4 0.00 Change in Crashes with FAST -55% -43% -00%

Red River Bridge Crashes MN Number of Crashes 4 0 8 6 4 7 I-94 Red River Bridge Winter Season Crash Summary (Minnesota) Non-Incapacitating Injury Possible Injury Property Damage 0 6 5 4 4 4 3 3 0 996 997 998 999 000 00 00 003 004 005 006 007 Winter Season

Red River Bridge Crashes MN Red River Bridge Crash Data MN Crash Scenario Winter Seasons Total Crashes Total Crashes PD Crashes Poss. Inj. Crashes Before FAST 9.5 5 5.7 4.4 0.6 After FAST.5 9* 3.6.4 0.8 Change in Crashes with FAST -37% -46% 7% * Removed property damage and possible injury crashes Red River Bridge Crash Data Normalized for AADT MN Crash Scenario AADT/Crash Scenario Annual Traffic Volume Total Crashes/ Volume x 0 6 Property Damage/ Volume x 0 6 Possible Injury/ Volume x 0 6 Before FAST 53,50 9,534,800 0.9 0.3 0.03 After FAST 6,37,745,705 0.6 0. 0.035 Change in Crashes with FAST -46% -53% 9%

Red River Bridge Crashes (ND & MN Combined) Red River Bridge Total Crash Data Crash Scenario AADT/Crash Scenario Annual Traffic Volume Total Crashes/Year Total Crashes/ Annual Volume x 0 6 Before FAST 53,50 9,534,800.79 0.60 After FAST 6,37,745,705 6.80* 0.30 Change in Crashes with FAST -4% -50% * Removed property damage and possible injury crashes

Benefit/Cost of FAST Systems System Benefits Quantitative Societal costs of crashes (life, productivity, legal, property damage) Maintenance costs (staff, equipment, material) Qualitative Reassurance and peace of mind System Costs Installation Maintenance and operations

Buxton Bridge FAST B/C Crash Reductions Crash-Vehicle Data (Factored for AADT) Crash Scenario Winter Seasons Total Crash - Veh. Crash-Veh. Property Damage Crash Veh. Injury Crash Veh. Before FAST 6.5 49 7.5 5.8.7 After FAST 5.5..8 0.3 Change in Crash-Vehicles w/ FAST -7% (5.4) -69% (4.0) -8% (.4) Reduced Manual Applications Winter 007 Spray Occurrences by Condition Spray Condition Sprays During Normal Hours Sprays Outside of Normal Hours Frost % 79% Freeze 6% 74%

Buxton Bridge FAST B/C System Benefits Crash reduction: $78,735/year Manual treatment reduction: $3,860/year System Costs Installation: $68,53 (00 Dollars) Maintenance: $,000/year (plus pump replacements of $5,000 at year 7 and 4) Utilities: $,6/year Chemical: $9,47/year (,55 gal at $8./gal) Benefit-Cost Analysis (0 yr. period) 4.3 (net benefits of $,57,869)

Red River Bridge FAST B/C Crash Reductions Crash-Vehicle Data (Factored for AADT) Crash Scenario Winter Seasons Total Crash-Veh. Crash Veh. Prop. Damage Crash Veh. Injury Crash Veh. Poss. Inj. Crash Veh. Before FAST 9.5 68 7.7.9.7.0 After FAST.5 4 9.6 8.6 0.3 0.7 Change in Crash-Vehicles w/ FAST -46% (8.) -34% (4.3) -87% (.4) -66% (.3) Reduced Manual Applications Winter 007 Spray Occurrences by Condition Spray Condition Sprays During Normal Hours Sprays Outside of Normal Hours Frost 0% 80% Freeze 40% 60%

Red River Bridge FAST B/C System Benefits Crash reduction: $6,578/year Manual treatment reduction: $48,983/year Traffic congestion savings: $4,060/year System Costs Installation: $,30,000 (005 Dollars) Maintenance: $,000/year (plus pump replacements of $0,000 at year 7 and 4) Utilities: $,955/year Chemical: $66,703/year (8,35 gal At $8.0/gal) Benefit-Cost Analysis (0 yr. period).3 (net benefits of $675,84)

Summary NDDOT Fargo District FAST work well High level of use (007) Buxton (0 days spraying 0 times) Red River (67 days spraying 0 times) System limitations are evident Wind speed >5 mph (no spray) and/or Pavement temp. < o F (no spray) Steep learning curve with new systems Vendor assistance is important

Summary Buxton Bridge FAST Total crash reduction of 66% B/C of 4.3 with a net benefit of $,57,869 Red River Bridge FAST Combined total crash reductions of 50% B/C of.3 with a net benefit of $675,84

Questions http://www.ugpti.org/pubs/pdf/dp9.pdf