Do the following exercises from the text: Chapter (Section 3):, 1, 17(a)-(b), 3 Prove that 1 3 + 3 + + n 3 n (n + 1) for all n N Proof The proof is by induction on n For n N, let S(n) be the statement 1 3 + 3 + + n 3 n (n + 1) Then S(1) is the statement 1 3 1 (1 + 1), which is true since 1 3 1 and 1 (1 + 1) 1 For the induction step, assume that S(k) is true for some k 1 Thus, we are assuming that 1 3 + 3 + + k 3 k (k + 1) Add (k + 1) 3 to both sides of this equation to get 1 3 + 3 + + k 3 + (k + 1) 3 k (k + 1) + (k + 1) 3 k (k + 1) + (k + 1) 3 (k + 1) (k + (k + 1)) (k + 1) (k + ) This shows that the truth of S(k) implies the truth of S(k+1) Hence, by the induction principle, S(n) is true for all n N 1 Show that the power set of any set X with exactly n elements has n elements Proof Use induction on the number n of elements of X For n N let S(n) be the statement: Any set X with n elements has a power set P(X) with exactly n elements For the base step of the induction argument, let X be any set with exactly 1 element, say X {a} Then the only subsets of X are the empty set and the entire set X {a} Thus P(X) 1 X, so the base case is true For the induction step, assume that k N is arbitrary and that any set X with X k has P(X) k Let X be any set with X k + 1, and count the number of subsets of X Suppose X {a 1,, a k, a k+1 } The subsets of X are of two types First, there are all of the subsets of X that do not contain a k+1, which consist of all subsets of {a 1,, a k } By the induction hypothesis, there are k subsets of {a 1,, a k }, so there are k subsets of X that do not contain a k+1 Then there are the subsets of X that do contain the Math 00 1
element a k+1 Every such subset of X has the form Y {a k+1 }, where Y is a subset of X that does not contain a k+1 Since our induction hypothesis is that there are k subsets Y of X \ {a 1,, a k }, there are also k subsets of X that contain a k+1 Hence, we conclude that there are k + k k k+1 subsets of X Thus, we have shown that the truth of statement S(k) implies the truth of statement S(k + 1) By the induction principle, S(n) is true for all n N 17 The Fibonacci numbers are defined inductively by f 1 1, f 1, and f n+ f n+1 +f n for n N (a) Prove that f n < n for all n N Proof Use induction on n Let S(n) be the statement: f n < n For the base case, f 1 1 < 1 so S(1) is true Also, S() is true since f 1 < We will use the strong induction principle Thus our induction hypothesis is that f k < k for 1 k n Thus, let n be given By the induction hypothesis and the definition of f n, f n f + f n < + n < + n By the strong induction principle, S(n) is true for all n N (b) Prove that f n+1 f f n + ( 1) n for all n Proof The proof is by induction on n For n let S(n) be the statement: f n+1 f f n + ( 1) n The statement S() is true since, for n, f n+1 f f n+( 1) n is the statement f 3 f 1 f + ( 1) which is 1 1 + 1 which is true Now assume that k and that S(k) is true, that is, assume f k+1 f k 1 f k + ( 1) k Rewrite this as f k f k+1 f k 1 ( 1) k ( 1) k 1 Now consider the left hand side with k replaced by k + 1 Then, using the recursive definitions of f k+1 and f k+, f k+1 f k+ f k f k+1 (f k + f k 1 ) f k+ f k f k (f k+1 f k+ ) + f k+1 f k 1 f k ( f k ) + f k+1 f k 1 (f k f k+1 f k 1 ) ( 1)( 1) k 1 ( 1) k Thus, if S(k) is true for some k, then S(k + 1) is also true By the principle of induction, S(n) is true for all n Math 00
3 Define the least common multiple of two nonzero integers a and b to be the nonnegative integer m such that both a and b divide m, and if a and b both divide any other integer n, then m also divides n Prove that there exists a unique least common multiple of for any two nonzero integers a and b Proof Suppose a and b are nonzero integers Let S {n Z : n > 0, a n and b n} S since a and b both divide ab and (ab), and one of these two integers is positive Since S is a nonempty subset of N, it has a smallest element m We claim that m is a least common multiple of a and b By the definition of S, a m and b m Now let n be any positive integer such that a n and b n We need to show that m n To see this, divide n by m to get n mq + r where 0 r < m Since r n mq is a linear combination of m and n, and since a divides both m and n it follows that a r Similarly b r If r > 0, it follows that r S and r < m, which contradicts that m is the smallest element of S Thus, r 0 and n mq so that m n To show that the least common multiple is unique, suppose that m and m are both least common multiples Then, m m and m m, so that m ±m and since both are positive, m m Supplemental Problems: 1 Show that any positive integer n 1 can be written as a linear combination 3u + 7v for nonnegative integers u, v Solution Thus, the question is if any positive integer n 1 can be written as n 3u + 7v for some nonnegative integers u and v Thus, let S(n) be the statement n 3u + 7v for some nonnegative integers u and v Since 1 3 + 0 7, S(1) is true Now assume that S(k) is true for some k 1 Then k 3u + 7v for some nonnegative integers u and v Case 1: v 0 In this case u since k 1 Then k +1 3(u )+7 and u > 0 Case : v 1 In this case u since k 3u + 7 1 1 Thus, as in case 1, k + 1 3(u ) + 7 Case 3: v In this case, k + 1 3(u + 5) + 7(v ) Thus, if k 1 and k 3u + 7v, then k + 1 3u + 7v so that if S(k) is true, then so is S(k +1) By the principle of mathematical induction, S(k) is true for all k 1 Compute the gcd of m 31 and n 150 and express it as a linear combination of m and n Math 00 3
Solution Use the Euclidean Algorithm: 31 ( ) 150 + 69 150 69 + 1 69 5 1 + 9 1 1 9 + 3 9 3 3 + 0 Thus gcd( 31, 150) 3 Reversing the process gives 3 1 9 1 (69 5 1) 6 1 69 6(150 69) 69 6 150 13 69 6 150 13( 31 + 150) ( 0) 150 + ( 13)( 31) 1 3 Let A Using mathematical induction, show that A 0 n n n 0 n for all positive integers n [ Solution Let S(n) be the statement A n n n 0 n [ 1 Since A 1 1 1 A 1 1 0 0 1 ] ], it follows that S(1) is a true statement For the [ inductive] step, assume that S(k) is true That is, assume that k 1 and A k k k k 1 0 k Then A k+1 A[ k A ] k k k 1 1 0 k 0 k k + k k 1 0 k k+1 (k + 1) k 0 k+1 n n The last matrix is of the form 0 n for n k + 1 Hence S(k + 1) is a true statement whenever S(k) is true It follows from the principle of mathematical induction that S(n) is true for all n 1, ie, the proposed formula for A n is valid for all n 1 Prove that n > n 3 for every integer n 10 Math 00
Solution Let S(n) be the statement n > n 3 If n 10, then 10 10 > 1000 10 3 so S(10) is a true statement For the inductive step, assume that S(k) is true for some k 10 assuming that k > k 3 Then k+1 k > k 3 k 3 + k 3 k 3 + k k > k 3 + 7k k 3 + 3k + 3k + k > k 3 + 3k + 3k + 1 (k + 1) 3 Thus, we are Reading from the beginning to the end of this chain of inequalities, we see that if k 10 and k > k 3, then it follows that k+1 > (k + 1) 3 Thus, if S(k) is true for some k 10, then S(k + 1) is also true By the principle of mathematical induction, it follows that S(n) is true for all n 10 Math 00 5