s for Professor: CHE LabTA Dent,Paul Washington, Refnum 29681, Course CHE 107, Section M016, FC 1 2 3 4 5 Total N % N % N % N % N % N Demographic Questions 1. Class Status 16 94.12 1 5.88 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 17 2. Is this course in your intended or actual major? 8 47.06 9 52.94 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 17 3. Your TA was present in the lab during the laboratory sessions: 17 100.0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 17 4. Did you try to see the TA outside of lab session times? 5 29.41 12 70.59 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 17 5. Would you like to have this TA in a laboratory again? 17 100.0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 17 Scale Key: Q1: 1=Freshman 2=Sophomore 3=Junior 4=Senior 5=Graduate Q2: 1=Yes 2=No Q3: 1=Always 2=Often 3=Sometimes 4=Rarely 5=Never Q4 & Q5: 1=Yes 2=No
s for Professor: CHE LabTA Dent,Paul Washington, Refnum 29681, Course CHE 107, Section M016, FC Question Unsatisfactory Below Above Exceptional Summary Stats. N % N % N % N % N % Total Mean StD 6. The TA's insistence on safety procedures in the laboratory was 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 11.76 6 35.29 9 52.94 17 4.41 0.71 7. The TA's promptness and fairness in grading reports and/or labs was 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 17.65 4 23.53 10 58.82 17 4.41 0.80 8. The TA's level of respect and sense of fairness in dealing with students was 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 5.88 4 23.53 12 70.59 17 4.65 0.61 9. The TA's level of enthusiasm for chemistry and for teaching was 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 5.88 8 47.06 8 47.06 17 4.41 0.62 10. The TA's voice was clear and understandable 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 11.76 4 23.53 11 64.71 17 4.53 0.72 11. The TA's willingness to explain the chemistry underlying the experiments was 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 5.88 7 41.18 9 52.94 17 4.47 0.62 12. The TA's ability to explain the chemistry underlying the experiments was 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 11.76 4 23.53 11 64.71 17 4.53 0.72 13. The TA's knowledge of laboratory procedures was 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 11.76 3 17.65 12 70.59 17 4.59 0.71 14. The TA's helpfulness was 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 5.88 3 17.65 13 76.47 17 4.71 0.59
Laboratory TA Evaluation General Laboratory, Reference #: 29681 Dent,Paul Washington Online Student RatingsOpenEnded s Fall 2011 Comments: Excellent lab instructor. Very highly recommended for anyone taking. He understands the concepts and tries his best to make sure everyone is on par with the subject we are dealing with in lab. Also, he is very enthusiastic about teaching and seems to enjoy it. Good T.A, always fair. Great Lab TA. He is very relaxed, but thorough in instruction. Paul has a good understanding of the course work and was willing to help me though problems. Professor Dent was a great TA to have in lab, and I would love to have him as a future TA. really helpful TA This was an online evaluation and responses are presented as they were electronically submitted by the respondents.
s for Professor: CHE LabTA Dent,Paul Washington, Refnum 30711, Course CHE 107, Section M025, FC 1 2 3 4 5 Total N % N % N % N % N % N Demographic Questions 1. Class Status 14 82.35 1 5.88 1 5.88 1 5.88 0 0.00 17 2. Is this course in your intended or actual major? 12 66.67 6 33.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 18 3. Your TA was present in the lab during the laboratory sessions: 18 100.0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 18 4. Did you try to see the TA outside of lab session times? 3 16.67 15 83.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 18 5. Would you like to have this TA in a laboratory again? 16 88.89 2 11.11 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 18 Scale Key: Q1: 1=Freshman 2=Sophomore 3=Junior 4=Senior 5=Graduate Q2: 1=Yes 2=No Q3: 1=Always 2=Often 3=Sometimes 4=Rarely 5=Never Q4 & Q5: 1=Yes 2=No
s for Professor: CHE LabTA Dent,Paul Washington, Refnum 30711, Course CHE 107, Section M025, FC Question Unsatisfactory Below Above Exceptional Summary Stats. N % N % N % N % N % Total Mean StD 6. The TA's insistence on safety procedures in the laboratory was 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 16.67 4 22.22 11 61.11 18 4.44 0.78 7. The TA's promptness and fairness in grading reports and/or labs was 0 0.00 1 5.56 2 11.11 4 22.22 11 61.11 18 4.39 0.92 8. The TA's level of respect and sense of fairness in dealing with students was 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 16.67 2 11.11 13 72.22 18 4.56 0.78 9. The TA's level of enthusiasm for chemistry and for teaching was 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 22.22 5 27.78 9 50.00 18 4.28 0.83 10. The TA's voice was clear and understandable 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 11.11 6 33.33 10 55.56 18 4.44 0.70 11. The TA's willingness to explain the chemistry underlying the experiments was 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 5.56 6 33.33 11 61.11 18 4.56 0.62 12. The TA's ability to explain the chemistry underlying the experiments was 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 16.67 4 22.22 11 61.11 18 4.44 0.78 13. The TA's knowledge of laboratory procedures was 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 11.11 5 27.78 11 61.11 18 4.50 0.71 14. The TA's helpfulness was 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 11.11 5 27.78 11 61.11 18 4.50 0.71
Laboratory TA Evaluation General Laboratory, Reference #: 30711 Dent,Paul Washington Online Student RatingsOpenEnded s Fall 2011 Comments: Amazing TA. Always willing to help whenever possible. Good lab instructor he's awesome I really liked prof. dent. He is a great guy and he knows all of the material. I wish he was my chemistry section teacher as well as my lab instructor. At most times, I feel like I learned more in my lab about topics covered than I learned in my actual chem section lecture. Enthusiastic, great knowledge of material, willing to help, clear delivery. Overall great TA Professor Dent was awesome! He really helped out everyone understand in our class. Some what condescending. This was an online evaluation and responses are presented as they were electronically submitted by the respondents.
Overall s 1 2 3 4 5 Total N % N % N % N % N % N Demographic Questions 1. Class Status 578 46.43 402 32.29 187 15.02 75 6.02 3 0.24 1245 2. Is this course in your intended or actual major? 769 62.02 471 37.98 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1240 3. Your TA was present in the lab during the laboratory sessions: 1199 96.38 35 2.81 7 0.56 2 0.16 1 0.08 1244 4. Did you try to see the TA outside of lab session times? 362 29.08 883 70.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1245 5. Would you like to have this TA in a laboratory again? 1005 80.72 240 19.28 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1245 Scale Key: Q1: 1=Freshman 2=Sophomore 3=Junior 4=Senior 5=Graduate Q2: 1=Yes 2=No Q3: 1=Always 2=Often 3=Sometimes 4=Rarely 5=Never Q4 & Q5: 1=Yes 2=No
Overall s Question Unsatisfactory Below Above Exceptional Summary Stats. N % N % N % N % N % Total Mean StD 6. The TA's insistence on safety procedures in the laboratory was 6 0.48 25 2.00 190 15.24 410 32.88 616 49.40 1247 4.29 0.83 7. The TA's promptness and fairness in grading reports and/or labs was 29 2.34 85 6.85 262 21.11 352 28.36 513 41.34 1241 4.00 1.05 8. The TA's level of respect and sense of fairness in dealing with students was 10 0.81 40 3.23 189 15.24 379 30.56 622 50.16 1240 4.26 0.89 9. The TA's level of enthusiasm for chemistry and for teaching was 32 2.57 66 5.30 276 22.15 386 30.98 486 39.00 1246 3.99 1.03 10. The TA's voice was clear and understandable 79 6.37 116 9.35 221 17.81 304 24.50 521 41.98 1241 3.86 1.24 11. The TA's willingness to explain the chemistry underlying the experiments was 22 1.77 65 5.23 211 16.98 334 26.87 611 49.16 1243 4.16 1.00 12. The TA's ability to explain the chemistry underlying the experiments was 41 3.30 78 6.28 199 16.01 356 28.64 569 45.78 1243 4.07 1.08 13. The TA's knowledge of laboratory procedures was 15 1.21 36 2.89 176 14.15 348 27.97 669 53.78 1244 4.30 0.90 14. The TA's helpfulness was 29 2.33 70 5.62 178 14.29 342 27.45 627 50.32 1246 4.18 1.02