Land-Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Electronic Workshop 18 September 27 October 2000

Similar documents
Explorations in Southeast Asian Studies

THE CASPAR CREEK EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED. Thomas Lisle, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Arcata, Califorina

Understanding the effects of roads in upland settings on hydrology, geomorphology and water quality

Illinois State Water Survey Division

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

The Influence of tropical cyclones as soil eroding and sediment transporting events. An example from the Philippines

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Channel head locations with respect to geomorphologic thresholds derived from a digital elevation model: A case study in northern Thailand

Recent findings related to measuring and modeling forest road erosion

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

FOREST MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON EROSION, SEDIMENT, AND RUNOFF: LESSONS FROM CASPAR CREEK AND NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA

Erosion prediction on unpaved mountain roads in northern Thailand: validation of dynamic erodibility modelling using KINEROS2

Appendix D. Model Setup, Calibration, and Validation

Toward understanding the cumulative impacts of roads in upland agricultural watersheds of northern Thailand

Dr. S.SURIYA. Assistant professor. Department of Civil Engineering. B. S. Abdur Rahman University. Chennai

The impact of hill land clearance and urbanization on runoff and sediment yield of small catchments in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

Effect of Runoff and Sediment from Hillslope on Gully Slope In the Hilly Loess Region, North China**

Flash flood disaster in Bayangol district, Ulaanbaatar

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Surface Water and Stream Development

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

Gully erosion in winter crops: a case study from Bragança area, NE Portugal

Updating Slope Topography During Erosion Simulations with the Water Erosion Prediction Project

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

The effect of soil physical parameters on soil erosion. Introduction. The K-factor

Each basin is surrounded & defined by a drainage divide (high point from which water flows away) Channel initiation

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario

SPECIFIC DEGRADATION AND RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION. By Renee Vandermause & Chun-Yao Yang

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

WATER ON AND UNDER GROUND. Objectives. The Hydrologic Cycle

Date of Report: EPA agreement number: Center Name and Institution of Ctr. Director: Identifier used by Center for Project: Title of Project:

Application of SWAT Model to Estimate the Runoff and Sediment Load from the Right Bank Valleys of Mosul Dam Reservoir

Watershed Processes and Modeling

Monitoring Headwater Streams for Landscape Response to

Use of SWAT to Scale Sediment Delivery from Field to Watershed in an Agricultural Landscape with Depressions

Analysis of Road Sediment Accumulation to Monumental Creek using the GRAIP Method

Landscape dynamics, Rainfall and Stream Flow: Linkages

KINEROS2/AGWA. Fig. 1. Schematic view (Woolhiser et al., 1990).

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Les Sawatsky, MSc., P.Eng. 1 Wes Dick, M.Sc., P.Eng. 1 Dave Cooper, B.A.Sc., P.Eng. 1 Marie Keys, B.A.Sc., P.Eng. 2

Assessment of solid load and siltation potential of dams reservoirs in the High Atlas of Marrakech (Moorcco) using SWAT Model

Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

EVALUATION OF MIGRATION OF HEAVY METAL CONTAINING SEDIMENT RESULTING FROM WATER EROSION USING A GEO- INFORMATION MODEL

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

Geog Lecture 19

Technical Memorandum No

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Hillslope Erosion Rates in the Oak Savannas of the Southwestern Borderlands Region

Flash Flood Guidance System On-going Enhancements

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Sediment Transport and Strata Formation in the Adriatic Sea

DRAFT. REVISED Draft. Paso Robles Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chapter 6

Analysis of Sedimentation in Wonogiri Reservoir

Abebe Sine Gebregiorgis, PhD Postdoc researcher. University of Oklahoma School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

CHAPTER VII FULLY DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL USING GIS

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Fenhe (Fen He) Map of River. Table of Basic Data. China 10

1. Evaluation of Flow Regime in the Upper Reaches of Streams Using the Stochastic Flow Duration Curve

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Impacts of Upstream Disturbances on Downstream Sediment Yield and Morphology in the Presence of Best Management Practices

Influence of the timing of flood events on sediment yield in the north-western Algeria

Watershed Conservation Management Planning Using the Integrated Field & Channel Technology of AnnAGNPS & CONCEPTS

A distributed runoff model for flood prediction in ungauged basins

2015 Fall Conditions Report

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Report. Developing a course component on disaster management

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Sediment yield estimation from a hydrographic survey: A case study for the Kremasta reservoir, Western Greece

Floodplain modeling. Ovidius University of Constanta (P4) Romania & Technological Educational Institute of Serres, Greece

DETERMINATION OF SEDIMENT TRAP EFFICIENCY OF SMALL WATER RESERVOIR AT KREMPNA

Surface Water Short Study Guide

Steve Pye LA /22/16 Final Report: Determining regional locations of reference sites based on slope and soil type. Client: Sonoma Land Trust

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions

The Importance of Snowmelt Runoff Modeling for Sustainable Development and Disaster Prevention

Mekong Sediment from the Mekong River Commission Study

PREDICTING BACKGROUND AND RISK-BASED SEDIMENTATION FOR FOREST WATERSHED TMDLS

FORM A GEOGRAPHY 1114 LABORATORY FINAL EXAM Teaching Assistant SAMPLE Lab Meeting. Place all answers on the answer sheet; 2 points per question

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Working with Natural Stream Systems

Impact of different types of meteorological data inputs on predicted hydrological and erosive responses to projected land use change

Squaw Creek. General Information

WHEN CAN YOU SEED FALLOW GROUND IN THE FALL? AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON FALL RAIN

Diego Burgos. Geology 394. Advisors: Dr. Prestegaard. Phillip Goodling

12 SWAT USER S MANUAL, VERSION 98.1

low turbidity high turbidity

PRECIPITATION. Assignment 1

HYDRAULIC MODELING OF SOIL ERORION

11/12/2014. Running Water. Introduction. Water on Earth. The Hydrologic Cycle. Fluid Flow

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

DROUGHT RISK EVALUATION USING REMOTE SENSING AND GIS : A CASE STUDY IN LOP BURI PROVINCE

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

Watershed Classification with GIS as an Instrument of Conflict Management in Tropical Highlands of the Lower Mekong Basin

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

Transcription:

Land-Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Electronic Workshop 18 September 27 October 2000 Case Study 28 Estimation of basin sediment flux in the Pang Khum Experimental Watershed in Northern Thailand: the contributions of roads and agricultural lands Alan D. Ziegler, Research Associate Thomas W. Giambelluca, Professor Ross A. Sutherland, Associate Professor University of Hawaii, Honolulu email: adz@hawaii.edu website: webdata.soc.hawaii.edu/hydrology FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, Italy

ABSTRACT Stream sediment load and sediment contributions from roads, paths, and agricultural lands are estimated for a one-year period in an upland watershed in northern Thailand. Total road sediment input to the stream was only slightly higher than that from agricultural lands (30-41 versus 25-40 Mg), but corresponding erosion rates were substantially greater (65-88 versus 2-4 Mg ha -1 y -1 ). The results emphasize that basin sediment yield is not a reliable indicator of the existence of severe erosion within a watershed. Rather, sediment budgeting approaches are needed to uncover important sediment sources that occupy small percentages of the total basin area (e.g., roads). Finally, the trend of focusing solely on erosional impacts of agricultural practices, ignoring impacts associated with unpaved roads, is not a sustainable conservation strategy for managing upland watersheds in SE Asia. INTRODUCTION In many areas of montane mainland SE Asia conservation efforts directed at reducing (1) human-induced alterations to stream hydrologic response and (2) sediment inputs to stream systems often focus on improving agricultural practices in upland watersheds, but ignore the associated impacts of mountain roads. In the Pang Khum Experimental Watershed (PKEW) in northern Thailand, we currently believe road-related impacts are on the same order of importance as those of agricultural lands, owing largely to the high frequency of Horton overland flow (HOF) generated on roads, the high conveyance efficiency of road runoff to the stream channel, and the constant renewal of entrainable road surface sediment by traffic. Figure 1 shows the estimated road surface runoff contribution to the stream system during the largest storm of the 1998 rainy season to be nearly equivalent to that associated with agricultural lands, despite roads occupying about 0.5% versus 12% of the land area (Ziegler et al., in review). In this paper, we use data from rainfall simulation experiments, recorded rainfall, and stream sediment measurements to estimate the sediment contributions from roads and other PKEW landuse types for a one-year period to determine the relative impact of roads versus agricultural lands in the basin THAILAND ROADS PROJECT (TRP) & PKEW In 1997 we began a study of hydrological and geomorphological impacts of unpaved roads near Pang Khum Village (19 3 N, 98 39 E), roughly 60 km NNW of Chiang Mai, Thailand (Figure 2). One objective is to determine the role of roads in initiating hydrologic change and contributing to erosion processes. Field work conducted mostly in the 93.7-ha PKEW included (1) establishing a network of six climatological stations to record variables needed for estimating basin water balance, and to provide data for numerical model simulations; (2) conducting rainfall simulations on roads and other basin landuse types to understand runoff generation and erosion processes, and to parameterize model variables; and (3) conducting detailed surveys of basin landcover/landuse and road-related phenomema (usage, sediment sources, and runoff exit points). Results from TRP are summarized elsewhere (Ziegler et al., in press; webdata.soc.hawaii.edu/hydrology). PKEW is part of the larger Khan River Basin that drains into the Ping River, which in turn empties into the Chao Praya River. Bedrock in PKEW is Triassic granite; soils include ultisols, alfisols, and inceptisols (field survey). Roads, access paths, and dwelling sites comprise about 1% of the PKEW area. Based on 1995 airphotos and recent ground cover surveys, approximately 12% of the basin area is agricultural land (cultivated and upland fields; and < 1.5 year-old abandoned fields); 13% is fallow land (i.e., not used for 1.5-4 years); 31 and 12% are young (4-10 years) and advanced (>10 years) secondary vegetation, respectively; and 31% is disturbed, primary forest. PKEW is described in detail elsewhere (Ziegler et al., 2000). Approximately 70% of all road runoff in PKEW directly enters the stream network at 1

intersections of the road and stream channel (Ziegler and Giambelluca, 1997; Ziegler et al., in press). Despite light traffic, the Upper and Lower PKEW Roads are noticeable sediment sources for material entering the stream channel network. METHODS During the one-year period extending from 15 Aug 1998 to 14 Aug 1999, a tipping bucket rain gauge (0.254-mm threshold) and datalogger were used to measure 1-min rainfall intensities (Station 406, Figure 2). Storm events were defined as precipitation events accumulating at least 12.7 mm without a 6-h rain-free period, or events having 6.4 mm within a 15-min period (based on Wischmeier and Smith, 1978). During the study period, 46 storms were recorded out of 178 total precipitation events. Stream flow was recorded at a V-notch weir constructed at the basin mouth in Loei Stream, the principal stream in PKEW (Station 405, Figure 2). In the dry seasons of 1998 and 1999 several replications of rainfall simulation experiments were performed on agricultural lands (hoed fields, upland fields, fallow fields, and field furrows), roads, and footpaths (Ziegler et al., 2000, in review). For the above-mentioned one-year period we estimated (1) stream sediment contributions originating from major landuse types via HOF, and (2) total stream sediment load. The first calculation uses storm event sediment transport rates (normalized by area and rainfall energy) that were determined during the rainfall simulation experiments. Specifically, for each of 46 storms and nine major landuse types--degraded forest, advanced secondary, young secondary, three types of agricultural fields (upland rice field, hoed field, hoed field with furrows), dwelling sites and access paths, and roads (Table 1)--we calculate the sediment input to the stream from a particular landuse type (Sj) as: 46 S = Storm EFD * Area * CE * Sed j i j j j i= 1 9 j = 1 where i and j refer to the storms and nine landuse types, respectively; Storm EFD [J m -2 ] is the energy flux density over the course of a storm event (calculated from rainfall data using equations in Ziegler et al., 2000); Area, CE, and Sed are the area, conveyance efficiency, and normalized sediment delivery rate for the nine landcover types (from Ziegler et al, in review). Road CE was based on a field survey; a range of realistic CE values were chosen for the other landuse types. Sed [g J -1 ] values are unique for wet and dry antecedent moisture conditions (wet defined as > 0.25 g cm -3 ). Landcover-specific values for Eq. 1 calculations are shown in Table 1. Note, sediment transport associated with overland flow resulting from non-hof mechanisms is not represented by the Sed values determined from rainfall simulation. Table 1. Area, conveyance efficiency, and sediment delivery values for nine landuse types used in the calculation of stream sediment inputs (via Eq. 1). Landcover Type* Area CE Seddry Sedwet (ha) (-) (g J -1 ) (g J -1 ) FOREST 29.0 0.1-0.2 - - ADVANCED SEC 11.2 0.1-0.2 - - YOUNG SEC 29.0 0.1-0.2 - - FALLOW FIELD 9.4 0.3-0.4 0.00 0.00 UPLAND FIELD 2.1 0.3-0.4 0.04 0.13 HOED FIELD 6.0 0.3-0.4 0.00 0.02 FIELD & FURROWS 6.0 0.3-0.4 0.02 0.07 DWELLINGS & PATHS 0.5 0.2-0.3 0.06 0.11 ROAD 0.5 0.7 1.23 0.74 *Data and landuse types are described in Ziegler et al., in review; - indicates no data were available from the rainfall simulation experiments; therefore, the values are assumed to be equal to those of FALLOW (i.e., Sed = 0). (1) 2

To estimate stream sediment load (S load ), measurements of sediment trapped behind the weir (trapped load, S trapped ) and suspended sediment flowing through the weir (free load, S free ) are used. To do so, we establish a relationship between discharge (Q i ) and the two types of loads. For S trapped, the relationship is determined from data collected before the volume of trapped material exceeded 25% of the weir capacity, after which the trapping efficiency greatly changed. Using discharge relationships, we calculate S load for each of 46 storm intervals (defined as extending from the beginning of one storm event until the start of the next) as follows: RESULTS 46 Sload = Strapped( Qi) + Sfree( Qi) i = 1 Estimations of sediment contributions from PKEW landuse types to Loei stream are shown in Figure 3A. Predicted surface runoff via the HOF mechanism occurred only on roads, paths, dwelling sites, and some agricultural surfaces (recently abandoned fields and fields containing footpaths), but not on fallow, secondary vegetation, and forest lands (Ziegler et al., in review). Corresponding predicted sediment input is approximately 56 Mg, for which the road contribution comprises 54%. Also shown is a higher estimate (B), calculated by (1) using higher CE values (Table 1) and (2) allowing non-storm events to produce runoff if total rainfall is greater than the depth required to produce HOF (based on rainfall simulation experiment data). For this estimate, the total sediment delivered to the stream is 83 Mg, with 50% coming from roads; 2%, from paths and dwelling sites. Total stream sediment load, estimated from Eq. 2, is 87 Mg (S load, Figure 3). For the free load estimate, which comprises 70% of the total, we were unable to determine a significant relationship between discharge and concentration; therefore, we use the mean sediment concentration value (0.18 g L -1 ; n = 48) for all 46 storm intervals in the calculation. For 13 trapped load measurements and corresponding Q i, the following power function best described the data: (2) S trapped = 0.00000182 Q 1.524 i (3) for which the P-values of the two coefficients are both < 0.0001; the fit for Eq. 3 is shown in Figure 4. DISCUSSION The higher value for S load, compared with the estimated inputs from basin landuse types (Figure 3), is logical because stream sediment load is composed of not only storm-related inputs (i.e., those estimated by Eq. 1), but also redistributed material that entered the stream channel during prior events, and sediment resulting from stream bank/bed erosion and/or mass wasting. The S load estimate is likely low because we were unable to collect data allowing calculation of sediment flushes that may occur within short intervals during the largest annual storm events (e.g., that in Figure 1). The agricultural sediment input estimate may be elevated because we intentionally use a relatively high range of CE values (Table 1). Conversely, cumulative S j could be underestimated, for we assume secondary vegetation and forest landuse types have the same sediment delivery values as that for fallow (i.e., Sed = 0, Table 1). Furthermore, S j estimates are probably low because we do not include sediment transport associated with non- HOF mechanisms. Despite the above errors, agreement between S load and total sediment inputs (Figure 3) suggests the estimates are reasonable for PKEW. 3

These estimates suggest PKEW sediment yield is probably about 1.0 Mg ha -1 y -1, a rate not greatly different than that expected for soil formation. Estimated agricultural, road, and path/dwelling contributions, however, range from 2-4, 65-88, and 2-5 Mg ha -1 y -1, respectively. The agricultural estimate is similar to recent data from the International Board for Soil Research and Management (IBSCRAM) and Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC) experiment site at Huay Luek (Chiang Dao), Thailand, where typical farmer-practice erosion rates for slopes similar to those in PKEW were < 6 Mg ha -1 y -1 (mean of 6 years; unpublished data). Although estimated annual road sediment input to the PKEW stream system is similar to that from agricultural sources, the erosion rate is 20-30 times higher. Therefore, although the sediment yield estimate does not indicate the occurrence of substantial erosion in the basin, the partial budget identifies roads as an important sediment source. In PKEW, significant road lowering (0.10-0.15 m y -1 ) occurs only on the steepest sections (0.15-0.30 m m -1 ), which comprise only 20-30% of the total basin road length. In other basins having a greater total road length, roads built on steeper slopes, and/or a major road artery (which PKEW does not), road-related sediment transport to the stream may be even more substantial. CONCLUSION This work indicates that road-related sediment inputs to a stream system can be on the same order of importance as those coming from agricultural lands, which have much larger contributing areas. Erosion assessments based solely on basin sediment yield measurements may fail to identify basins where road-related erosion is substantial. Only through sediment budgeting will the relative sediment contributions from all important sediment sources be uncovered. Finally, the data acknowledge that three keys to minimizing road-related sediment inputs to the stream system in upland watersheds in the study area are (1) limiting total road length; (2) minimizing road building on steep slopes; and (3) reducing conveyance efficiencies of road overland flow to the stream network. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was partially funded by the National Science Foundation Award (grant no. 9614259). Alan Ziegler was supported by an EPA Star Fellowship and a Horton Hydrology Research Award (Hydrological Section, American Geophysical Union). REFERENCES Wischmeier, WH, Smith, DD. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses. Agriculture Handbook no. 537. USDA, Washington D.C. Ziegler, AD, Giambelluca, TW, Sutherland, RA, Pongpayack, Y, Yarnasarn, S, Nullet, MA, Pinthong, J, Vana, TT, Jaiarree, S, Boonchee, S. In press. Toward understanding the cumulative impacts of roads in agricultural watersheds of montane mainland Southeast Asia. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment. Ziegler AD, Sutherland RA, Giambelluca, TW. 2000. Runoff generation and sediment transport on unpaved roads, paths, and agricultural land surfaces in northern Thailand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25 (5): 519-534. Ziegler, AD, Sutherland, RA, Giambelluca, TW. In review. On the trail of erosion: the importance of footpaths in accelerating Horton overland flow in an agricultural watershed in northern Thailand. Geomorphology. 4

Figure 1. Estimated road and agricultural field contributions to the storm hydrograph in PKEW during the largest storm of 1998 (Ziegler et al., in review). Figure 2. The Pang Khum Experimental Watershed in northern Thailand. Experiments were performed near Station 406. 5

Figure 3. Two estimates of contributions from roads, agricultural fields, and path/dwelling sites (via Eq. 1 & Table 1 values) to annual total stream sediment load (S load, from Eq. 2). Estimated values for the three landuse groupings are respectively: (A) 30, 25, and 1; and (B) 41, 40, and 2 Mg. Figure 4. Relationship between discharge (Q i ) and sediment trapped by the weir; the fitted line for S trapped is that of Eq. 3. 6