Card Variable MID RO E PR ECC QH0 FT FC. Type A8 F F F F F F F. Default none none none 0.2 AUTO 0.3 none none

Similar documents
CDPM2: A damage-plasticity approach to modelling the failure of concrete

20. Rheology & Linear Elasticity

SIMPLIFIED CONCRETE MODELING WITH *MAT_CONCRET_DAMAGE_REL3

INCREASING RUPTURE PREDICTABILITY FOR ALUMINUM

Homework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. Fall 2004

Numerical investigation of EDZ development around a deep polymetallic ore mine

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

Lecture #8: Ductile Fracture (Theory & Experiments)

ANSYS Mechanical Basic Structural Nonlinearities

Development and numerical implementation of an anisotropic continuum damage model for concrete

An anisotropic continuum damage model for concrete

SEMM Mechanics PhD Preliminary Exam Spring Consider a two-dimensional rigid motion, whose displacement field is given by

Basic Equations of Elasticity

3D MATERIAL MODEL FOR EPS RESPONSE SIMULATION

EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS

PLAXIS. Material Models Manual

Modelling of ductile failure in metal forming

Mechanical Properties of Materials

14. LS-DYNA Forum 2016

MODELING OF CONCRETE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES. Kaspar Willam

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

LS-DYNA Peridynamics for Brittle Failure Analysis

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 2 Jan 2009

6. NON-LINEAR PSEUDO-STATIC ANALYSIS OF ADOBE WALLS

Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering

Numerical Simulation of Reinforced Concrete Beam with Utilization of Elasto-plastic Material Model of Concrete

SIZE EFFECTS IN THE BIAXIAL TENSILE-COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR OF CONCRETE: PHYSICAL MECHANISMS AND MODELLING

A rate-dependent Hosford-Coulomb model for predicting ductile fracture at high strain rates

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF DAMAGE IN THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS

Chapter 6: Mechanical Properties of Metals. Dr. Feras Fraige

ME 2570 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Nonlinear FE Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using a Tresca-Type Yield Surface

*MAT_PAPER - a new orthotropic elastoplastic model for paper materials

Rock Rheology GEOL 5700 Physics and Chemistry of the Solid Earth

MODELING OF CONCRETE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES. Kaspar Willam. Uniaxial Model: Strain-Driven Format of Elastoplasticity

5 ADVANCED FRACTURE MODELS

An orthotropic damage model for crash simulation of composites

Stress, Strain, Mohr s Circle

Chapter 7. Highlights:

Plasticity R. Chandramouli Associate Dean-Research SASTRA University, Thanjavur

Advanced Numerical Study of the Effects of Road Foundations on Pavement Performance

Continuous Surface Cap Model for Geomaterial Modeling: A New LS-DYNA Material Type

Abstract. 1 Introduction

EVALUATION OF NONLOCAL APPROACHES FOR MODELLING FRACTURE IN NOTCHED CONCRETE SPECIMENS

Bone Tissue Mechanics

Failure behavior modeling of slender reinforced concrete columns subjected to eccentric load

3D Elasticity Theory

Finite element analysis of diagonal tension failure in RC beams

Recent Developments in Damage and Failure Modeling with LS-DYNA

Cracking in Quasi-Brittle Materials Using Isotropic Damage Mechanics

Stress Integration for the Drucker-Prager Material Model Without Hardening Using the Incremental Plasticity Theory

Numerical simulation of sheet metal forming processes using a new yield criterion

Predicting Failure of Multiangle Composite Laminates

TRESS - STRAIN RELATIONS

Introduction to Engineering Materials ENGR2000. Dr. Coates

Lecture #7: Basic Notions of Fracture Mechanics Ductile Fracture

Cracking in Quasi-Brittle Materials Using Isotropic Damage Mechanics

Optimization as a tool for the inverse identification of parameters of nonlinear material models

ALGORITHM FOR NON-PROPORTIONAL LOADING IN SEQUENTIALLY LINEAR ANALYSIS

Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension

GISSMO Material Modeling with a sophisticated Failure Criteria

Module-4. Mechanical Properties of Metals

Microplane Model formulation ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary

Module III - Macro-mechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. Macro-Mechanics of Lamina

Unit IV State of stress in Three Dimensions

Experiments and Numerical Simulations on Stress-State-Dependence of Ductile Damage Criteria

1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams

Anisotropic modeling of short fibers reinforced thermoplastics materials with LS-DYNA

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC STRUCTURES WITH ENERGY DISSIPATORS

CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS FOR LINEAR ELASTIC SOLIDS

Prediction of Elastic Constants on 3D Four-directional Braided

Mechanics PhD Preliminary Spring 2017

Failure surface according to maximum principal stress theory

Practice Final Examination. Please initial the statement below to show that you have read it

Numerical Erosion in Continuum Damage Mechanics. Shashank N Babu. Master of Science Thesis

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 5. Engineering Properties of Rocks (West, Ch. 6)

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 161 (2016 )

Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 9, 1995 WIT Press, ISSN X

Anisotropic plasticity, anisotropic failure and their application to the simulation of aluminium extrusions under crash loads

Elastic parameters prediction under dynamic loading based on the. unit cell of composites considering end constraint effect

AiMT Advances in Military Technology

The design of a formula student front impact attenuator

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SPIRAL-STRAND CABLES SUBJECTED TO HIGH VELOCITY FRAGMENT IMPACT

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Discrete Element Modelling of a Reinforced Concrete Structure

MASONRY MICRO-MODELLING ADOPTING A DISCONTINUOUS FRAMEWORK

Experimental and theoretical characterization of Li 2 TiO 3 and Li 4 SiO 4 pebbles

PLAXIS 3D TUNNEL. Material Models Manual version 2

3D Finite Element analysis of stud anchors with large head and embedment depth

A Semianalytical Model for the Simulation of Polymers

Creep and aging in nonlinear models for concrete

Experimentally Calibrating Cohesive Zone Models for Structural Automotive Adhesives

Importance of concrete material characterization and modelling to predicting the response of structures to shock and impact loading

* Many components have multiaxial loads, and some of those have multiaxial loading in critical locations

Lecture #6: 3D Rate-independent Plasticity (cont.) Pressure-dependent plasticity

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Principal Stresses, Yielding Criteria, wall structures

ELASTICITY (MDM 10203)

Composite models 30 and 131: Ply types 0 and 8 calibration

Transcription:

Note: This is an extended description of MAT_273 input provided by Peter Grassl It contains additional guidance on the choice of input parameters beyond the description in the official LS-DYNA manual Last updated: 10112016 *MAT_CDPM This is MAT_273 CDPM is a damage plastic concrete model based on work published in Grassl et al (2011, 2013) and Grassl and Jirásek (2006) This model is aimed to simulations where failure of concrete structures subjected to dynamic loadings is sought It describes the characterization of the failure process subjected to multi-axial and rate-dependent loading The model is based on effective stress plasticity and with a damage model based on both plastic and elastic strain measures This material model is available only for solids There are a lot of parameters for the advanced user but note that most of them have default values that are based on experimental tests They might not be useful for all types of concrete and all types of load paths but they are values that can be used as a good starting point If the default values are not good enough the theory chapter at the end of the parameter description can be of use History variables that can be exported to the database are: 1 damage function in tension 2 damage function in compression 3 number of integration points in element that have failed Card 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Variable MID RO E PR ECC QH0 FT FC Type A8 F F F F F F F Default none none none 02 AUTO 03 none none Card 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Variable HP AH BH CH DH AS DF FC0 Type F F F F F F F F Default 05 008 0003 20 10E-6 150 085 AUTO

Card 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Variable TYPE BS WF WF1 FT1 STRFLG FAILFLG EFC Type F F F F F F F F Default 00 10 none 015*WF 03*FT 00 00 10E-4 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION MID Material identification A unique number or label not exceeding 8 characters must be specified RO E Mass density Young's modulus If the value of the Young's modulus E is not available, it can be estimated from the uniaxial compressive strength according to, for instance, the CEB-FIP Model Code 2010 PR ECC QH0 FT FC Poisson's ratio Eccentricity parameter EQ00: ECC is calculated from Jirásek and Bazant (2002) as ECC = 1 + ε 2 ε, ε = f + f,- f,- f - f, f,- = 116 + Initial hardening defined as F ci /F C where F Ci is the compressive stress at which the initial yield surface is reached Default is 03 Uniaxial tensile strength (stress) If the value of the uniaxial tensile strength is not available, the tensile strength can be estimated from the uniaxial compressive strength according to, for instance, the CEB-FIP Model Code 2010 Uniaxial compression strength (stress)

HP Hardening parameter For applications without strain rate effect (STRFLG = 0) a value of HP = 001 is recommended An even lower value, such as HP=0001, is recommended for explicit analyses in which a realistic description from the transition from tension to compression is important Default in LSDYNA is HP = 05 which was the value used in Grassl et al (2011) for strain rate dependent material response and is only recommended if STRFLG = 1 AH Hardening ductility parameter 1 (see default value in card 2) BH Hardening ductility parameter 2 (see default value in card 2) CH Hardening ductility parameter 3 (see default value in card 2) DH Hardening ductility parameter 4 (see default value in card 2) AS Ductility parameter during damage (see default value in card 2) DF Flow rule parameter (see default value in card 2) FC0 TYPE BS Rate dependent parameter Only needed if STRFLG = 1 Recommended value is 10 MPa, which has to be entered consistently with the system of units used Flag for tensile damage type EQ00: Linear damage formulation EQ10: Bi-linear damage formulation EQ20: Exponential damage formulation EQ30: No damage Default = 00 However, the best results are obtained with the bi-linear formulation Damage ductility exponent during damage

WF WF1 FT1 STRFLG FAILFLG EFC ISOFLAG Tensile threshold value for linear tensile damage formulation Parameter controlling tensile softening branch for exponential tensile damage formulation For TYPE=0 (linear softening), WF = 2 GF/FT where GF is the total fracture energy For TYPE=1 (bilinear softening), and the default values for WF1 and FT1, WF = 4444 GF/FT Finally, for TYPE = 2 (exponential softening), WF = GF/FT If the value of the fracture energy GF is not available, it can be estimated from the uniaxial compressive strength according to, for instance, the CEB-FIP Model Code 2010 For tetrahedral meshes it is currently recommended to use 056 WF because the way that the element length is computed for this type of element overestimates the fracture energy In some cases, softening down to zero stress might result into numerical problems, which are not directly related to the constitutive model To overcome these problems, it might be necessary to use an exponential softening law Tensile threshold value for the second part of the bi-linear damage formulation Tensile strength threshold value for bi-linear damage formulation Strain rate flag EQ10: Strain rate dependent EQ00: No strain rate dependency Failure flag EQ00: Not active No erosion GT00: Active and element will erode if wt and wc is equal to 1 in FAILFLG percent of the integration points If FAILFLG=060, 60% of all integration points must fail before erosion Parameter controlling compressive damage softening branch in the exponential compressive damage formulation Flag to determine if an isotropic or an anisotropic damage formulation is used It is controlled through the sign of E A negative value of E sets the isotropic damage formulation Sgn(E) = 1: ISOFLAG EQ00: Anisotropic damage formulation Sgn(E) = -1: ISOFLAG EQ10: Isotropic damage formulation Default: ISOFLAG = 0

History variables Note: these history variables might only be available in the latest development version of LS-DYNA 1 kappa 2 equivalent strain 3 plastic strain xx 4 plastic strain yy 5 plastic strain zz 6 plastic strain xy 7 plastic strain zy 8 plastic strain xz 9 kappa tension kdt 10 kappa tension kdt1 11 kappa tension kdt2 12 kappa compression kdc 13 kappa compression kdc1 14 kappa compression kdc2 15 damage variable tension omegat 16 damage variable compression omegac 17 strain rate factor 18 compression factor, alphac 19 equivalent strain - tension 20 equivalent strain - compression 21 total xx strain 22 total yy strain 23 total zz strain 24 total xy strain 25 total yz strain 26 total xz strain 27 equivalent strain w/out rate factor Remarks: The stress for the anisotropic damage plasticity model (ISOFLAG=0) is defined as σ = 1 ω + σ + + (1 ω - )σ c where s t and s c are the positive and negative part of the effective stress σ 899 determined in the principal stress space The scalar functions w t and w c are damage parameters The stress for the isotropic damage plasticity model (ISOFLAG=1) is defined as σ = 1 ω + σ 899

The effective stress σ eff is defined according to the damage mechanics convention as σ eff = D e : (ε ε p ) Plasticity: The yield surface is described by the Haigh-Westergaard coordinates: the volumetric effective stress s v, the norm of the deviatoric effective stress r and the Lode angle q, and it is given by f @ σ B, ρ, θ, κ = 1 q G κ q Ġ κ q κ ρ + σ B 6 + 3 ρ 2 + m J q G κ q κ ρ r cos θ + σ B 6 The variables q 1 and q 2 are dependent on the hardening variable k The parameter f c is the uniaxial compressive strength The shape of the deviatoric section is controlled by the function 4 1 e cos θ + 2e 1 r cos θ = 2 1 e cos θ + 2e 1 4 1 e cos θ + 5e 4e where e is the eccentricity parameter (ECC) The parameter m 0 is the friction parameter and it is defined as where f t is the tensile strength m J = 3 f + f + e e + 1 The flow rule is non-associative which means that the direction of the plastic flow is not normal to the yield surface This is important for concrete since an associative flow rule would give an overestimated maximum stress The plastic potential is given by where and g σ B, ρ, κ = 1 q G κ A S = 3f +q (κ) ρ + σ B 6 + 3 ρ 2 + q G κ V W XY Z 9 [ /] m S σ B, κ = A S κ B S κ e ^_9` + m J 2, B S = q (κ) 3 ln A S 3q + m J 2 1 + f + / m J ρ + m S σ B, κ 6 + ln D 9 + 1 2D 9 1 The hardening laws q 1 and q 2 control the shape of the yield surface and the plastic potential, and they are defined as

q G κ = q dj + 1 q dj κ ] 3κ + 3κ H @ κ ] 3κ + 2κ, κ < 1 q G κ = 1, κ 1 q κ = 1, κ < 1 q κ = 1 + H @ κ 1, κ 1 The evolution for the hardening variable is given by κ = 4λ cos θ x d (σ B ) It sets the rate of the hardening variable to the norm of the plastic strain rate scaled by a ductility measure which is defined below as dg dσ And finally x d σ B x d σ B = A d A d B d e Xk l m l, R d 0 k l = E d ep l + D d, R d < 0 E d = B d D d, F d = B d D d C d A d B d Damage: Damage is initialized when the equivalent strain ε reaches the threshold value ε J = f + equivalent strain is defined as E where the ε = ε Jm J ρ r cosθ + σ v + ε J m J ρ r cosθ + σ v + 3ε J ρ 2 6 4 6 2f - Tensile damage is described by a stress-inelastic displacement law For linear and exponential damage type the stress value f + and the displacement value w 9 must be defined For the bi-linear type two additional parameters f t1 and w f1 must be defined, see figure below how the stress softening is controlled by the input parameters σ + f + σ + f + σ + ft f +G w 9 ε + h w 9G w 9 ε + h w 9 ε + h

The variable h is a mesh-dependent measure used to convert strains to displacements The variable ε + is called the inelastic tensile strain and is defined as the sum of the irreversible plastic strain ε @ and the reversible strain w + ε ε @ (in compression w - ε ε @ ) To get the influence of multi-axial stress states on the softening a damage ductility measure x { is added: Where A { and B { are input parameters, and R { = The inelastic strain is then modified according: x { = 1 + A { 1 R {^ 6σ B ρ, σ B < 0 and R { = 0, σ B > 0 ε = ε x { Compressive damage is controlled by an exponential stress-inelastic strain law Stress value f c and inelastic strain ε fc need to be specified, see figure below how the stress softening is controlled by the input parameters A small value of ε fc, ie 10E-4 (default), provides for a rather brittle form of damage σ - A { ε 9- ε - Strain rate: Concrete is strongly rate dependent If the loading rate is increased, the tensile and compressive strength increase and are more prominent in tension then in compression The dependency is taken into account by an additional variable α 1 The rate dependency is included by scaling both the equivalent strain rate and the inelastic strain The rate parameter is defined by α = (1 X - @ 8{{ ) α + + X - @ 8{{ α - Where X is continuous compression measure (= 1 means only compression, = 0 means only tension) and for tension we have

1 ε ˆ < 30 10 XŠ s XG α + = β + ε ˆ ε +J ε ˆ ε +J [ 30 10 XŠ < ε ˆ < 1 s XG G ] ε ˆ > 1 s XG where δ + = G GŽ 9`/9` factor is given by where δ - = G Ž 9`/9`, β + = e Š [X and ε +J = 1 10 XŠ s XG For compression the corresponding rate α - = 1 ε < 30 10 XŠ s XG S ε ε -J β - ε ε -J GJŠ ` G ] 30 10 XŠ < ε < 1s XG ε > 30s XG, β - = e ŠG Š `X and ε -J = 30 10 XŠ s XG The parameter J is an input parameter A recommended value is 10MPa References P Grassl and M Jirásek "Damage-plastic model for concrete failure" International Journal of Solids and Structures Vol 43, pp 7166-7196, 2006 P Grassl, U Nyström, R Rempling and K Gylltoft, "A damage-plasticity model for the dynamic failure of concrete", 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, Leuven, Belgium, 2011 P Grassl, D Xenos, U Nyström, R Rempling, K Gylltoft "CDPM2: A damage-plasticity approach to modelling the failure of concrete" International Journal of Solids and Structures Volume 50, Issue 24, pp 3805-3816, 2013