EFFECTS OF DEBRIS-FLOW CONTROL WORKS ON ENVIRONMENT AND CONSEQUENCES FOR LAND-USE PLANNING CASE STUDY MURBACH, TYROL, AUSTRIA

Similar documents
The 2005 Flood and Sediment Disaster in the Western Parts of Tyrol/Austria Facts und Conclusions

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Debris flow: categories, characteristics, hazard assessment, mitigation measures. Hariklia D. SKILODIMOU, George D. BATHRELLOS

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

The Effects of Hydraulic Structures on Streams Prone to Bank Erosion in an Intense Flood Event: A Case Study from Eastern Hokkaido

Catastrophic Events Impact on Ecosystems

The SedAlp Project: WP6: INTERACTION WITH STRUCTURES

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

LOCATIONS OF SELECTED MITIGATION SITES IN JAPAN

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

GG101 Lecture 22: Mass Wasting. Soil, debris, sediment, and broken rock is called regolith.

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Surface Water Short Study Guide

Streams. Stream Water Flow

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

WATER ON AND UNDER GROUND. Objectives. The Hydrologic Cycle

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

Landscape Development

EFFECT OF TWO SUCCESIVE CHECK DAMS ON DEBRIS FLOW DEPOSITION

Working with Natural Stream Systems

EFFECTS OF RIPARIAN RETENTION (IN WATERSHEDS) ON ALLUVIAL FANS

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Mountain Rivers. Gutta cavat lapidem. (Dripping water hollows out a stone) -Ovid, Epistulae Ex Ponto, Book 3, no. 10, 1. 5

EROSION AND DEPOSITION

Nevado Del Ruiz, Lahars

Science EOG Review: Landforms

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

SPECIFIC DEGRADATION AND RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION. By Renee Vandermause & Chun-Yao Yang

1 INTRODUCTION AND MAJOR FINDINGS... 1

Environmental Geology Chapter 9 Rivers and Flooding

Mass Wasting: The Work of Gravity

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

What do you need for a Marathon?

Experimental Study on Effect of Houses on Debris-Flow Flooding and Deposition in Debris Flow Fan Areas

Technical note about the monitoring of hydromorphological restoration/management of the Drava River in Slovenia

APPROACH TO THE SPANISH WATER ORGANISATION IMPROVING FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING, LAWS AND AUTHORITIES COORDINATION

3 Erosion and Deposition by Ice

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

What are the different ways rocks can be weathered?

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

3/8/17. #20 - Landslides: Mitigation and Case Histories. Questions for Thought. Questions for Thought

A FLOOD RETENTION BASIN IN AN ABANDONED STONE QUARRY - EVALUATING THE STABILITY OF A SUBMERGED ROCK SLOPE

8 Current Issues and Research on Sediment Movement in the River Catchments of Japan

Flash flood disaster in Bayangol district, Ulaanbaatar

APPLICATION TO PAST DISASTERS OF A METHOD OF SETTING THE RANGE OF DEBRIS FLOW DAMAGE TO HOUSES

Modeling Great Britain s Flood Defenses. Flood Defense in Great Britain. By Dr. Yizhong Qu

Floods Lecture #21 20

Surface Processes on the Earth. Rocks, Weathering, Erosion and Soil

Description DESCRIPTION

Fukien Secondary School Monthly Vocabulary/Expression List for EMI Subjects Secondary Two. Subject: Geography

Temperature and Sound Survey on Steep Tea Farm Area and Salt Pan Site

Chapter 11. Rivers: Shaping our landscape

National Hydrology committee of Afghanistan (NHCA) Sedimentation in Reservoire

Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans

Hydraulic Structures. Notes and Handouts

Bell Ringer. Are soil and dirt the same material? In your explanation be sure to talk about plants.

Erosion and Deposition

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Ch 10 Deposition Practice Questions

Changes to Land 5.7B. landforms: features on the surface of Earth such as mountains, hills, dunes, oceans and rivers

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

GEOMORPHIC CHANGES IN LOWER CACHE CREEK 2012

Page 1. Name:

Think about the landforms where you live. How do you think they have changed over time? How do you think they will change in the future?

PiXL Independence: Geography Answer Booklet KS4. AQA Style, UK Physical Landscapes. Contents: Answers

Weathering, Erosion, Deposition

MASS MOVEMENTS, WIND, AND GLACIERS

Best Management Practices for Coldwater Fisheries Enhancement and Restoration

Field Trip Number One. By: Pat Dryer. Geography 360

9/13/2011 CHAPTER 9 AND SUBSIDENCE. Case History: La Conchita Landslide. Introduction

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES. Page

What is weathering and how does it change Earth s surface? Answer the question using

Prepared By: John Blair Sean Donahue Celeste Hoffman Kimberly Klinkers Megan Slater

EARTH S CHANGING SURFACE

RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

1/6/ th Grade Earth s Surface. Chapter 3: Erosion and Deposition. Lesson 1 (Mass Movement)

A Roundup of Recent Debris Flow Events in Taiwan

Need of Proper Development in Hilly Urban Areas to Avoid

Essential Questions. What is erosion? What is mass wasting?

Internationales Symposion INTERPRAEVENT 2004 RIVA / TRIENT

Foundations of Earth Science, 6e Lutgens, Tarbuck, & Tasa

SESSION 6: FLUVIAL LANDFORMS

Fact sheet: Glacial rivers (all Europe)

In the space provided, write the letter of the description that best matches the term or phrase. a. any form of water that falls to Earth s

The effects of forest in controlling gully erosion

Erosion and Deposition

Transcription:

EFFECTS OF DEBRIS-FLOW CONTROL WORKS ON ENVIRONMENT AND CONSEQUENCES FOR LAND-USE PLANNING CASE STUDY MURBACH, TYROL, AUSTRIA Joerg Heumader 1* ABSTRACT The torrent Murbach is one of the most dangerous debris-flow torrents in the Oetz Valley. 1762 a village located on its cone was destroyed almost totally by a series of debris flows. The destroyed houses and farms were not rebuilt on the same site, but on a safer place not on the debris cone. Combined technical control works have been installed in three building periods between 1954 and 2005. In the paper the effects of these control works on environment and the consequences for future land-use and development on the protected debris cone are discussed. Despite the fact, that the control works will bring safety up to the design event of 150-years probability, to the author`s opinion some restrictions for future development are nevertheless necessary. Key words: Debris-flow control, Environment, Land-use restrictions, Near-nature control INTRODUCTION Debris-flow torrents are responsible for sediment disasters with severe property and infrastructure damages and often also for injured and killed people. Debris-flow dynamics require massive technical counter measures on the one hand, on the other the assessment of residual risks despite implemented defense works is problematic in such cases and the influence of defense works on environment is often criticized as negative in public opinion. The above problems and found solutions for an individual debris-flow torrent are described and discussed in the paper. DESCRIPTION OF THE CATCHMENT AND PAST SEDIMENT DISASTERS The catchment basin of the torrent "Murbach", community Umhausen, district Imst/Tyrol, has an area of 3,8 km². Its headwater reach is very steep and reaches up to almost 3000 m a.s.l., steep flanks characterize also the middle reach. On the bottom of the Oetz valley (1000 m a.s.l.) a very large debris cone is an indicator of this torrent's activities. 1 Professor, Federal Service for Torrent and Avalanche Control, Austria (*Corresponding Author; Tel: +43-2- 82261010, e-mail: joerg.heumader@cni.at) -740-

The climatic conditions are continental; the average precipitation is only 710 mm per year. The maximum thunderstorm rainfall is recorded with 96 mm per hour 1966. The bedrocks are foliated gneiss and schist. In parts of the headwater reach and in the middle reach they are covered with thick veneers of glacial deposits. These relict deposits are the sources for heavy debris flows. "Murbach" means "debris-flow torrent" and it can be characterized exactly with this word. The design event for hazard zoning is based on a debris flow with 70.000 m³ volume. There are practically no negative human activities (e.g. deforestation) in this watershed. In the period from the 9 th to the 11 th of July in the year 1762 a series of debris flows, coming down from the basin for 40 hours damaged 68 houses and farm buildings, which had been built on the southern sector of the debris cone. Only one house in this part of the village "Umhausen" has withstood this catastrophe. 9 persons and a lot of livestock were killed ( Fig. 1 and 2). Fig. 1 and 2: The village of Umhausen before and after the catastrophe of 1762. After this enormous disaster the damaged houses were not rebuilt on the same place, but on a new site, called "Neudorf" (that means "New Village"). Only after the second-world-war new houses were built again on the southern fringe of the debris cone. DEBRIS FLOW DEFENSE WORKS A combination of defense measures has been planned and constructed by the Austrian Federal Service for Torrent and Avalanche Control (Fig. 3). In the middle reach two sections have been consolidated by chains of check dams made of reinforced concrete. It is estimated, that roughly 30.000 m³ of erodible moraine material are consolidated by these check dams. At the valley outlet a gravity dam with large holes made of concrete masonry functions as a sort of debris-flow breaker; its storage capacity is 5.000 m³ (Fig. 4). On the uppermost part of the debris cone a deflecting earth dam, protected on the waterside slope by a revetment of dry-laid boulders, shall keep off debris flows from the partly settled southern fringe of the debris cone as an additional second barrier. -741-

On the northern sector of the uppermost part of the debris cone a debris-flow retention basin has been built. It reaches upstream almost to the debris-flow breaker, it is bordered to the north by the mountainside and to the south by an earth dam, whose waterside slope is protected by dry-laid boulders. The basin's outlet is a dam, made of reinforced concrete with steel bars closing its opening, supported on the left by an angular retaining wall and fixed on the right to a natural rock outcrop by prestressed anchors. The retention capacity of the basin is 40.000 m³ at minimum, depending on the aggradation grade (Fig. 5). Because a farmland reallocation and consolidation operation has been started on the debris cone, it was possible to build a totally new channel downstream the retention basin, located in as great a distance from the settled area as possible. The new channel runs on the northern border of the cone in the depression, where the two debris-flow cones of the "Murbach" and of its neighbor torrent to the north meet. Fig 3: Overview map of the debris-flow cone of the torrent Murbach and its surroundings with defense works. EFFECTS ON ENVIRONMENT, LANDSCAPE AND RECREATION Debris-flow retention basin Despite the fact, that the retention basin will be filled up by the next debris-flow, natureorientated planning has been done for the period before that event. Considering environmental and landscape aspects the dam's outer slope has been afforested with groups of conifers (Larix decidua) and some broadleaf tree species. Willow cuttings (Salix sp.) and alder plants (Alnus -742-

sp.) have been planted into the gaps between the dry-laid stones of the revetment of the inner slope. The basin's bottom has been structured and left to natural revegetation (Fig. 5). The basin's outlet's opening reaches down to the torrent bottom and is no barrier for migrating fish. Because of the special outlet construction of the basin only the earth dam can be seen from the opposite mountainside. Fig. 4: At the valley outlet a gravity dam, made of concrete masonry, functions as a debris-flow breaker. Fig. 5: The debris-retention basin has been structured, but otherwise left to natural regeneration. Near-nature channel Permanent environment and landscape-orientated control measures are only possible downstream the debris-flow retention basin, where the torrent reach has changed as result of the implemented debris-flow defense works from a debris-flow reach to a section with flood runoff transporting only suspended load and some bedload. -743-

Planning had to take into account the energy surplus of the water runoff downstream the retention basin, which would have resulted in severe depth and lateral erosion problems. When setting out the channel's centerline it was tried to integrate existing stone rows, bush and tree groups etc. The channel has an open, natural bottom with varying width fixed by low sills made of boulders founded on timber logs. The banks with varying slope inclinations, steeper in the outer curves, gently inclined in the inner curves, are protected by revetments of dry-laid stones, founded on timber logs (Fig. 6 and 7). The gaps in the stone pavement were planted with willow cuttings (Salix sp.), the upper edge and strips of varying width on both banks with groups of bushes and trees. The torrent's alluvial cone is a steep "debris-flow cone", showing typical morphology and landforms, like debris lobes and levees, stone heaps and large boulders deposited by debris flows. Fig. 6 and 7: Near-nature channel under and just after construction without water running. It has been cultivated by livestock farmers since centuries for the production of hay, in former times also flax and corn have been grown. The cultivation resulted in typical landscape elements, like heaps and rows of stones picked up on the cultivated land. These stone heaps are partly stocked by several species of bushes and some trees, they are habitats for small mammals, lizards, birds and insects. Unproductive areas covered by coarse-grained debris deposits remained uncultivated and developed naturally. Parallel to some sections of the channel new stone rows were deposited, copying the stone heaps of former times. Large excavated boulders were deposited near the channel as impressive debris-flow indicators. Three channel widenings with gently inclined slopes have been designed as waterplaygrounds for children, several picnic places and information boards have been installed (Fig. 8). -744-

Fig. 8: Channel widenings as playing grounds for children. People like to walk along the man-made stream and of course children love playing in the stream bed and on the banks. The step-pool-structure of the new channel is very positive for water-life, even two fish species (Salmo trutta f. fario and Salvelinus fontinalis) live here now (Fig. 9). Fig. 9: Step-pool-structures and densely planted banks as good habitats for life inside and outside the water. -745-

CONSEQUENCES FOR LAND-USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING The torrent defense works have been designed for a debris-flow event with a recurrence probability of 150 years, according to the rules of hazard zoning in Austria. The sediment disaster of 1762 most probably had been one of lower probability according to the historical descriptions. Therefore we can not be sure, if our technical defense works will prevent damages on the whole protected cone in the future. These considerations led to the conclusion to develop further only the already partly settled southern sector of the cone, which is additionally protected by the deflection dam as second barrier, but to restrict the use of the other sectors to agriculture including rural buildings (farmsteads, stables, barns, haystacks). The development of these sectors for housing and touristic buildings is forbidden by the land-use and development authorities (Fig. 10). Fig. 10: Hazard Zone and Development Map of the debris cone Murbach, Umhausen, Tyrol, with areas restricted for agriculture and rural buildings on the northern sector and for housing and touristic development on the southern sector. -746-

CONCLUSIONS The case study Murbach shows that when planning and implementing torrent control works not only safety for people, buildings and infrastructure is to be reached as main goal, but that environment, landscape and recreation are also important aspects. These aspects have to be taken into account in the planning procedure. Even in case of debrisflow torrents there are some possibilities to reach these additional goals, especially when erosion and debris transport can be reduced or stopped by technical consolidation and/or retention works (Heumader 2004). Debris-flows, rapid landslides and snow avalanches may bring not only heavy damages, but endanger also human lives. In these cases therefore residual risks after the implementation of defense works require careful considerations and some precautious restrictions for future developments may be necessary, of course depending on the individual situation. REFERENCES Heumader J. (2004): The use of environment-orientated control measures in debris-flow torrents possibilities and limits, Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Slopeland Disaster Mitigation, Taipei, Taiwan -747-