Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Similar documents
PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

K2K and T2K experiments

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

F. Retière (TRIUMF) For the T2K collaboration

Leïla Haegel University of Geneva

T2K neutrino oscillation results

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

Long Baseline Neutrinos: As Far From A Tabletop Experiment As You Can Get. Scott Oser UBC. Colloquium at Toronto. October 20, 2011

The Search for θ13 : First Results from Double Chooz. Jaime Dawson, APC

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

Figure 1 Overview of the T2K experiment

Oscillating Neutrinos and T2K

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

Past, Present and Future of long baseline neutrino experiments. Apero SPP 16 September 2016 S.Bolognesi (CEA)

Solar and atmospheric ν s

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

Status and prospects of neutrino oscillations

Atmospheric neutrinos with Super-Kamiokande S.Mine (University of California, Irvine) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

Current status of T2K experiment

Correlated Background measurement in Double Chooz experiment

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Chart of Elementary Particles

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 May 2015

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part I

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 1 Oct 2015

Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Latest Results from the OPERA Experiment (and new Charge Reconstruction)

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

T2K and the MAINZ Photon Beam

Introduction to Super-K and Hyper-K. Roger Wendell Kyoto U. High-Energy Group Meeting

Leptons and the Weak Interaction

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota. High Energy seminar, University of Virginia

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

On the measurements of neutrino energy spectra and nuclear effects in neutrino-nucleus interactions

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

Future Experiments with Super Neutrino Beams

Neutrino Oscillation Detection at the T2K Experiment

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

Steve Biller, Oxford

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Oscillations

Daya Bay and joint reactor neutrino analysis

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

The Hyper-Kamiokande project

The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery

Final results from K2K and status of T2K

Neutrino Oscillations

Latest results from NOvA

arxiv: v3 [hep-ex] 24 Nov 2015

Hadron Production Experiments and Neutrino Beams

Existing and future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments

Chapter 2 T2K Experiment

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

HARP (Hadron Production) Experiment at CERN

fro m t h e MIN O S E x pe rim e n t

The SHiP experiment. Colloquia: IFAE A. Paoloni( ) on behalf of the SHiP Collaboration. 1. Introduction

Results and Status from HARP and MIPP

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

Neutrino Oscillations

Transcription:

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On Behalf of the T2K Collaboration, December 14-20 2016, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Outline Neutrino Oscillations The T2K Experiment Beam Near detectors Far detector Results θ23and Δm232 Electron anti-neutrino appearance δcp and mass hierarchy Future Plans Conclusions 2

Three flavour mixing in lepton sector The neutrino flavour eigenstates are mixtures of the mass eigenstates Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata Mixing Matrix PMNS 3

Neutrino Oscillations Neutrino oscillations discovered in 1998 Neutrinos have non-zero mass and mixing angles Many open questions: What is the neutrino mass hierarchy? Is Δm231 positive or negative? CP symmetry is violated if δcp 0,π Is the θ23 mixing angle maximal? Δm221 = (7.53 ±0.2)x10-5 ev2 Δm232 = (2.44 ±0.06)x10-3 ev2 sin2θ12= 0.304 ±0.01 (θ12~33 ) sin2θ23= 0.514 ±0.06 (θ23~45 ) sin22θ13= 0.085 ±0.005 (θ13~8 ) Is there CP violation in the lepton sector? PDG2015 If not, which quadrant? What are the precise values of the mixing angles θij? Majorana or Dirac? Δm2ij= m2i-m2j 4

Neutrino oscillation probabilities at T2K E=0.6 GeV Muon neutrino survival probability: Sensitive to θ23 and Δm232 Electron neutrino appearance probability (expansion by α = Δm221 / Δm231): L=295 km Comparing neutrino and anti-neutrino disappearance: test of CPT symmetry For anti-neutrinos, replace δ and x with -δ and -x Leading term depends on θ13 and θ23, CP-violating phase δ => P(ν ν ) P(ν ν ), μ e μ e Matter effect gives sensitivity to mass hierarchy: sign of x. 5

Effect of CP violation at T2K Asymmetric effect: δcp = -π/2 maximizes P(νμ νe), minimizes P(νμ νe) δcp = +π/2 minimizes P(νμ νe), maximizes P(νμ νe) Effect of δcp and Mass Hierarchy on appearance probability is similar. Size of effect: δcp: 0 to (±) 20% effect Mass hierarchy: ±10% 6

The T2K Collaboration The T2K collaboration includes about 500 members from 11 countries (Canada, Include France, Germany,info Italy, collaboration herejapan, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, UK, USA). 7

The T2K Experiment In Japan Off-axis ν beam 2.5 μ Two production modes: Neutrino and anti-neutrino Neutrino flux peaks at 0.6 GeV Less than 1% νe under the peak 280 m νμ /νe νμ SK: 50 kt water, 22.5 kt fiducial INGRID ND280 8

J-PARC Linac Rapid Cycling Synchrotron Near Detector To Kamioka Neutrino Main Ring Bird s eye view of J-PARC 17 July. 2009 9

T2K Beam Line 30 GeV proton beam from J-PARC main ring 90 cm graphite target Neutrinos produced from pion and kaon decays For anti-neutrinos: Invert focusing-horn polarity which selects the charged pions and kaons Dedicated hadron production measurements from NA61/SHINE crucial for T2K (anti)neutrino flux predictions Off-axis beam: centre of beam direction 2.5 off from direction to SK Narrow beam energy peak around oscillation maximum, Fewer high-energy neutrinos, so less problematic background 10

Near Detectors: INGRID On-axis detector, Consists of 16 modules, 7 horizontal, 7 vertical and 2 off diagonal, each module is a cube of 1 m3, Each module is a sandwich of 11 scintillator and 10 iron layers, surrounded by 4 veto planes, Neutrino beam centre is obtained with accuracy of ~ 0.1 mrad from horizontal/vertical distribution of neutrino event rate, 10mrad Horizontal 10mrad Vertical Provides cross section measurements and constraining beam flux 11

Near Detectors: ND280 Off-axis detector 2 Fine-Grained Detectors (FGDs) of scintillator bars, one has water target, neutrinos 3 gas-filled TPCs to reconstruct and identify charged particle tracks 0.2 T magnetic field used for charged particle momentum determination P0D: π0 detector ECAL: Electromagnetic CALorimeter SMRD: Side Muon Range Detector Information on neutrino flux and interactions from reconstructed tracks ND280 strongly reduces systematic uncertainties of T2K oscillation analysis 12

Far Detector: Super Kamiokande Situated 1000 m under ground in Kamioka mine, 295 km from J-PARC 50 kt water Cherenkov detector with a fiducial volume of 22.5 kt Inner Detector is instrumented with 11129 20-inch PMTs Outer Detector has 1885 8-inch PMTs 41.4 m 39.3 m 13

Particle ID and Event Selection νμ μ νe e Sharp Cherenkov ring, only direct light from μ Fuzzier Cherenkov ring, due to scatter/em shower Excellent μ/e separation Probability to misidentify a muon as an electron < 1% Select 1 ring events for analysis νμ selection e-like PID p > 100 MeV/c e No Michel electron E < 1.25 GeV rec Pass π0 rejection μ-like PID p > 200 MeV/c μ At most 1 Michel electron νe selection 14

Data Sample POT=Protons On Target Results with full good quality data up to May 27: ν-mode: 7.48x1020 POT ν-mode: 7.47x1020 POT Continuous rise in beam power:~225 kw (2014) ~420kW (2016) Accumulated almost the same number of POT in ν- and ν-mode 15

Analysis Method NND~(σΦ)NDεND NSK ~(σφ)skεskposc ΔNSK/NSK~ 5% θ13, θ23, Δm231/32, δcp (θ12 and Δm221 fixed from other experiments) 16

Systematic Uncertainties Expected events at SK as a function of reconstructed neutrino energy ND280 reduces the systematic uncertainties on expected neutrino events at SK from 1214% to 5-6% νμ νe νμ νe 17

Results The results presented in this talk are from the analysis of the combined T2K neutrino and antineutrino data samples (νμ,νμ,νe,νe) with four parameters (δcp, θ13, θ23, Δm232) fitted simultaneously. 18

νμand νμdisappearance Neutrino mode Anti-neutrino mode νμ νμ νμand νμ results are consistent Disappearance and distortion of energy spectrum for both ν and ν μ Preliminary μ Previous publications: PRL 112 181801 (2014) PRD 91 07210 (2015) PRL 116, 181801(2016) No evidence of CPT violation 19

Constraints on θ23and Δm 2 32 20

νe and νe appearance Anti-neutrino mode Neutrino mode νe Clear appearance signal for νe More statistics needed for νe νe Previous publications: PRL 112, 061802(2014) PRD 91, 072010(2015) 21

Constraints on θ13 and δcp Number of νe and νe candidates compared with predictions : Number of observed events shows larger asymmetry than expected for δcp = -π/2 and NH T2K-only data fit θ13in agreement with reactor experiments T2K begins to probe δcp Reactor experiment constraint from PDG 2015 (sin2 2θ13= 0.085 ±0.005) shown δcp ~ -π/2 and NH preferred T2K disfavors region of δcp = +π/2 22

Constraints on δcp 90% CL constraints on δcp from Feldman-Cousins method Reactor constraint: sin2 2θ13= 0.085 ±0.005 (PDG 2015) Best fit gives δcp= -1.791, Normal Hierarchy Allowed 90% CL The allowed 90% CL intervals are: -3.13 < dcp < -0.39 (NH) and -2.09 < dcp < -0.74 (IH) CP conserving values δcp= 0 and p are excluded at 90% C.L. CP conservation hypothesis excluded at 90% CL 23

Future Plans 24

T2K-II T2K: ends when 7.8x1021 POT is reached (expected around 2021) T2K-II: proposed extension up to 2026 for 20x1021 POT Stage 1 status at this summer's J-PARC PAC (Program Advisory Committe) Plan to gradually increase the beam intensity (currently ~ 400 kw) up to 1 MW in 2021 J-PARC accelerator and beam-line upgrade: Beam power up to 1.3 MW in ~2026 Upgrade of near detectors to improve systematic uncertainties Possible increase of SK fiducial volume T2K-II targeted scenario A step towards Hyper-Kamiokande [arxiv: 1609.04111] 25

Physics Potential of T2K-II Unknown Mass Hierarchy Sensitivity for sin2θ23=0.43 Mass Hierarchy Known With full T2K-II statistics able to: Exclude CP conservation hypothesis at more than 3σ if δcp ~-π/2 Measure θ23 with resolution ~1.7 26

Conclusions Since 2010 T2K has accumulated ~ 1.5x1021 POT, 19% of expected total, split equally in neutrino and anti-neutrino mode First search for CP violation in the lepton sector with analysis using both neutrino and anti-neutrino data (νμ/νμ disappearance, νe/νe appearance) Leading results for θ23 and Δm232 CP conservation hypothesis excluded at 90% CL Data prefer maximal (θ23= 45 ) νμ/νμ disappearance δcp = [-3.13,-0.39] NH, [-2.09,-0.74] IH Expect to double neutrino data by summer 2017 and to reach 7.8x1021 POT around 2021 Proposed extension to T2K: Accumulate 20x1021 POT by 2026, Reach > 3σ sensitivity to δcp ~-π/2 27

BACKUP 28

Flux Prediction Neutrino and anti-neutrino flux prediction tuned with hadron spectra from NA61/SHINE Flux uncertainty reduced from ~30% to ~10% (thin target data) Less than 1% electron (anti)neutrino component at the peak, <10% wrong-sign background, Using predictions of flux correlations between near/far, neutrino/anti-neutrino beam,νμ /νe 29

NA61/SHINE experiment at CERN SPS Large-acceptance detector with very good capabilities of charge and mass measurements Located in the CERN North Area Cover almost full T2K {p,θ} phase space Measure pion, proton and kaon production with 31 GeV/c proton beam on carbon target Thin 2cm target (Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 84 (2016)) T2K replica target (published π± yields: Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 617 (2016)) 30

Systematics Improvements given by measurements with ND280 data 31

Near detector neutrino sample for systematics constraint - 1 μ candidates Neutrino samples, best-fit distributions 32

Near detector anti-neutrino sample for systematics constraint Anti-neutrino samples, best-fit distributions 1 μ+ candidates 33

SK νμ /νμselection No magnetic field: same selection for neutrino and anti-neutrino beam 34

SK νe /νe selection No magnetic field: same selection for neutrino and anti-neutrino beam 35

SK spectra Predicted spectra at SK compared to candidate events Energy reconstructed assuming 2-body kinematics 36