Nonlife Actuarial Models. Chapter 4 Risk Measures

Similar documents
Some results on Denault s capital allocation rule

Regularly Varying Asymptotics for Tail Risk

Comonotonicity and Maximal Stop-Loss Premiums

Translation invariant and positive homogeneous risk measures and portfolio management. Zinoviy Landsman Department of Statistics, University of Haifa

Distortion Risk Measures: Coherence and Stochastic Dominance

Coherent Risk Measures. Acceptance Sets. L = {X G : X(ω) < 0, ω Ω}.

F X (x) = P [X x] = x f X (t)dt. 42 Lebesgue-a.e, to be exact 43 More specifically, if g = f Lebesgue-a.e., then g is also a pdf for X.

Decision principles derived from risk measures

VaR vs. Expected Shortfall

Risk Aggregation with Dependence Uncertainty

Experience Rating in General Insurance by Credibility Estimation

General approach to the optimal portfolio risk management

Random Variables. Random variables. A numerically valued map X of an outcome ω from a sample space Ω to the real line R

Finanzrisiken. Fachbereich Angewandte Mathematik - Stochastik Introduction to Financial Risk Measurement

ИЗМЕРЕНИЕ РИСКА MEASURING RISK Arcady Novosyolov Institute of computational modeling SB RAS Krasnoyarsk, Russia,

Multivariate extensions of expectiles risk measures

Probability Transforms with Elliptical Generators

Creating New Distributions

Market Risk. MFM Practitioner Module: Quantitiative Risk Management. John Dodson. February 8, Market Risk. John Dodson.

Non-Life Insurance: Mathematics and Statistics

Actuarial models. Proof. We know that. which is. Furthermore, S X (x) = Edward Furman Risk theory / 72

Multivariate Stress Testing for Solvency

Aggregate Risk. MFM Practitioner Module: Quantitative Risk Management. John Dodson. February 6, Aggregate Risk. John Dodson.

Spectral Measures of Uncertain Risk

Multivariate Stress Scenarios and Solvency

The Laplace Transform. Background: Improper Integrals

Applications of axiomatic capital allocation and generalized weighted allocation

Financial Econometrics and Volatility Models Extreme Value Theory

Modelling the risk process

Generalized quantiles as risk measures

Expected Shortfall is not elicitable so what?

A Probability Primer. A random walk down a probabilistic path leading to some stochastic thoughts on chance events and uncertain outcomes.

A Theory for Measures of Tail Risk

The Laplace Transform. Background: Improper Integrals

Value at Risk and Tail Value at Risk in Uncertain Environment

Nonlife Actuarial Models. Chapter 14 Basic Monte Carlo Methods

MULTIVARIATE EXTENSIONS OF RISK MEASURES

Fundamentals in Optimal Investments. Lecture I

Asymptotic behaviour of multivariate default probabilities and default correlations under stress

Solutions of the Financial Risk Management Examination

Nonlife Actuarial Models. Chapter 5 Ruin Theory

On Backtesting Risk Measurement Models

Modern Portfolio Theory with Homogeneous Risk Measures

Dependence. MFM Practitioner Module: Risk & Asset Allocation. John Dodson. September 11, Dependence. John Dodson. Outline.

Bregman superquantiles. Estimation methods and applications

J. Marín-Solano (UB), M. Bosch-Príncep (UB), J. Dhaene (KUL), C. Ribas (UB), O. Roch (UB), S. Vanduffel (KUL)

Expected Shortfall is not elicitable so what?

On a relationship between distorted and spectral risk measures

Survival Models. Lecture: Weeks 2-3. Lecture: Weeks 2-3 (Math 3630) Survival Models Fall Valdez 1 / 31

Increases in Risk Aversion and Portfolio Choice in a Complete Market

A Note on the Swiss Solvency Test Risk Measure

Applying the proportional hazard premium calculation principle

Solution of the Financial Risk Management Examination

Competitive Equilibria in a Comonotone Market

A new approach for stochastic ordering of risks

RISK AND RELIABILITY IN OPTIMIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Sharp bounds on the VaR for sums of dependent risks

STA 256: Statistics and Probability I

Stochastic Programming: Basic Theory

Elicitability and backtesting

Inverse Stochastic Dominance Constraints Duality and Methods

CVaR and Examples of Deviation Risk Measures

where r n = dn+1 x(t)

What Is a Good External Risk Measure: Bridging the Gaps between Robustness, Subadditivity, and Insurance Risk Measures

Structural Reliability

Multivariate Distribution Models

COHERENT APPROACHES TO RISK IN OPTIMIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Shape of the return probability density function and extreme value statistics

Summary of basic probability theory Math 218, Mathematical Statistics D Joyce, Spring 2016

Continuous Random Variables

CONTAGION VERSUS FLIGHT TO QUALITY IN FINANCIAL MARKETS

Estimation de mesures de risques à partir des L p -quantiles

EEL 5544 Noise in Linear Systems Lecture 30. X (s) = E [ e sx] f X (x)e sx dx. Moments can be found from the Laplace transform as

Robust Optimization for Risk Control in Enterprise-wide Optimization

MFM Practitioner Module: Risk & Asset Allocation. John Dodson. February 4, 2015

Set Theory Digression

MEASURES OF RISK IN STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION

The Slow Convergence of OLS Estimators of α, β and Portfolio. β and Portfolio Weights under Long Memory Stochastic Volatility

An axiomatic characterization of capital allocations of coherent risk measures

Three hours. To be supplied by the Examinations Office: Mathematical Formula Tables and Statistical Tables THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER.

Generalized quantiles as risk measures

Robust Return Risk Measures

Coherent risk measures

Representation theorem for AVaR under a submodular capacity

We introduce methods that are useful in:

Order book resilience, price manipulation, and the positive portfolio problem

Multivariate comonotonicity, stochastic orders and risk measures

Lu Cao. A Thesis in The Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) Norm: Stochastic Case

Risk, Choquet Portfolios and Quantile Regression

MONOTONICITY OF RATIOS INVOLVING INCOMPLETE GAMMA FUNCTIONS WITH ACTUARIAL APPLICATIONS

ISSN Distortion risk measures for sums of dependent losses

Tail Conditional Expectations for. Extended Exponential Dispersion Models

Almost essential: Consumption and Uncertainty Probability Distributions MICROECONOMICS

Introduction to Dependence Modelling

Basic concepts of probability theory

Characterization of Upper Comonotonicity via Tail Convex Order

Risk Aversion and Coherent Risk Measures: a Spectral Representation Theorem

Optimal Reinsurance Strategy with Bivariate Pareto Risks

Brief Review of Probability

Transcription:

Nonlife Actuarial Models Chapter 4 Risk Measures

Learning Objectives 1. Risk measures based on premium principles 2. Risk measures based on capital requirements 3. Value-at-Risk and conditional tail expectation 4. Distortion functions 5. Proportional hazard transform 2

4.1 Uses of Risk Measures Types of risks 1. Market risk 2. Credit risk 3. Operational risk Uses of risk measures 1. Determination of economic capital 2. Determination of insurance premium 3. Internal risk management 4. External regulatory reporting 3

Definition 4.1: A risk measure of the random loss X, denoted by (X), is a real-valued function : X R, wherer is the set of real numbers. As a loss random variable, X is nonnegative. Thus, the risk measure (X) may be imposed to be nonnegative for the purpose of measuring insurance risks. However, if the purpose is to measure the risks of a portfolio of assets, X may stand for the change in portfolio value, which may be positive or negative. In such cases, the risk measure (X) maybe positive or negative. 4

4.2 Some Premium-Based Risk Measures Let X be a random loss. Denote E(X) =μ X and Var(X) =σx 2.Denote (X) as a risk measure of the loss X. Expected-value principle premium risk measure: premium with a loading on the expected loss, i.e., (X) =(1+θ)μ X,whereθ 0 is the premium loading factor. Pure premium risk measure: no loading, i.e., θ =0,sothat (X) =μ X. Variance premium risk measure: loading on variance, i.e., (X) =μ X + ασx, 2 α 0. Standard-deviation risk measure: (X) =μ X + ασ X, α 0. loading on standard deviation, i.e., 5

4.3 Coherent Risk Measures Four axioms for coherent risk measures Axiom 4.1 Translational invariance (T): For any loss variable X and any nonnegative constant a 0, (X + a) = (X)+a. Axiom 4.2 Subadditivity (S): For any loss variables X and Y, (X + Y ) (X)+ (Y ). Axiom 4.3 Positive homogeneity (PH): For any loss variable X and any nonnegative constant a, (ax) =a (X). Axiom 4.4 Monotonicity (M): For any loss variables X and Y such that X Y under all states of nature, (X) (Y ). 6

Example 4.2: Show that the expected-value premium risk measure satisfies Axioms S, PH and M, but not T. Solution: For any risks X and Y,wehave (X + Y ) = (1+θ)E(X + Y ) = (1+θ)E(X)+(1+θ)E(Y ) = (X)+ (Y ). Thus, Axiom S holds. Now for Y = ax with a 0, we have (Y )=(1+θ)E(Y )=(1+θ)E(aX) =a(1 + θ)e(x) =a (X), which proves Axiom PH. FortworisksX and Y, X Y implies μ X μ Y. Thus, (X) =(1+θ)μ X (1 + θ)μ Y = (Y ), 7

and Axiom M holds. To examine Axiom T, we consider an arbitrary constant a>0. Note that, if θ > 0, (X + a) =(1+θ)E(X + a) > (1 + θ)e(x)+a = (X)+a. Thus, Axiom T is not satisfied if θ > 0, which implies the expected-value premium is in general not a coherent risk measure. However, when θ =0, Axiom T holds. Thus, the pure premium risk measure is coherent. 2 It can be shown that the variance premium risk measure satisfies Axiom T, but not Axioms S, M and PH. On the other hand, the standard-deviation premium risk measure satisfies Axioms S, T and PH, but not Axiom M. Readers are invited to prove these results (see Exercises 4.2 and 4.3). 8

The axioms of coherent risk narrow down the set of risk measures to be considered for management and regulation. However, they do not specify a unique risk measure to be used in practice. Some risk measures (such as the pure premium risk measure) that are coherent may not be a suitable risk measure for some reasons. Thus, the choice of which measure to use depends on additional considerations. 9

4.4 Some Capital-Based Risk Measures 4.4.1 Value-at-Risk One of the most widely used measures of risk VaR δ (X) istheδ-quantile of X, i.e., VaR δ (X) = F 1 X (δ) = inf{x [0, ) :F X (x) δ}. (4.5) Example 4.3: Find VaR δ of the following loss distributions X: (a) E(λ), (b) L(μ, σ 2 ), and (c) P(α, γ). 10

Solution: For (a), from Example 2.8, we have log(1 δ) VaR δ =. λ For (b), from Example 2.8, the VaR is VaR δ =exp h μ + σφ 1 (δ) i. For (c), from equation (2.38), the df of P(α, γ) is F X (x) =1 so that its quantile function is à γ x + γ! α, F 1 X (δ) =γ(1 δ) 1 α γ, and VaR δ = F 1 X (δ) =γ h (1 δ) 1 α 1 i. 11

Example 4.4: Find VaR δ, for δ =0.95, 0.96, 0.98 and 0.99, of the following discrete loss distribution X = 100, with prob 0.02, 90, with prob 0.02, 80, with prob 0.04, 50, with prob 0.12, 0, with prob 0.80. Solution: As X is discrete, we use the definition of VaR in equation (4.5). The df of X is plotted in Figure 4.1. The dotted horizontal lines correspond to the probability levels 0.95, 0.96, 0.98 and 0.99. Note that the df of X is a step function. For VaR δ we require the value of X corresponding to the probability level equal to or next-step higher than δ. Thus, VaR δ for δ = 0.95, 0.96, 0.98 and 0.99, are, respectively, 80, 80, 90 and 100. 12

1.05 1 Distribution function 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0 20 40 60 80 100 Loss variable X

4.4.2 Conditional Tail Expectation VaR does not use any information about the loss distribution beyond the cut-off point. Conditional tail expectation, denoted by CTE δ (X), rectifies this. Defintion: CTE δ (X) =E[X X>VaR δ (X)] (4.10) When X is continuous, we have CTE δ =E(X X>VaR δ )= 1 1 δ Z VaR δ xf X (x) dx. (4.17) Using change of variable ξ = F X (x), the integral above can be written as Z xf X (x) dx = VaR δ 13 Z VaR δ xdf X (x)

= Z 1 δ VaR ξ dξ, (4.18) which implies CTE δ = 1 1 δ Z 1 δ VaR ξ dξ. (4.19) Thus, CTE δ can be interpreted as the average of the VaRs exceeding VaR δ. We call the expression on the RHS of (4.19) the Tail VaR, denoted as TVaR δ. When X is not continuous, we use the following formula CTE δ = ( δ δ)var δ +(1 δ)e(x X>VaR δ ), (4.22) 1 δ where δ =Pr(X VaR δ ). (4.21) 14

Remarks VaR is not a coherent risk measure. It violates the subadditivity axiom. CTEisacoherentriskmeasure. Example 4.6: Calculate CTE δ for the loss distribution given in Example 4.4, for δ =0.95, 0.96, 0.98 and 0.99. Also, calculate TVaR corresponding to these values of δ. Solution: As X is not continuous we use equation (4.22) to calculate CTE δ.notethatvar 0.95 =VaR 0.96 = 80. For δ =0.95, we have δ =0.96. Thus, E(X X>VaR 0.95 = 80) = 90(0.02) + 100(0.02) 1 0.96 =95, 15

so that from equation (4.22) we obtain CTE 0.95 = For δ =0.96, we have δ =0.96, so that (0.96 0.95)80 + (1 0.96)95 1 0.95 =92. CTE 0.96 =E(X X>VaR 0.96 =80)=95. For TVaR δ, we use equation (4.23) to obtain Z 1 TVaR 0.95 = 1 VaR ξ dξ 1 0.95 0.95 = 1 [(80)(0.01) + (90)(0.02) + (100)(0.02)] 0.05 = 92, and TVaR 0.96 = 1 1 0.96 Z 1 0.96 VaR ξ dξ = 1 0.04 16 [(90)(0.02) + (100)(0.02)] = 95.

For δ =0.98, we have δ =0.98, so that CTE 0.98 =E(X X>VaR 0.98 =90)= (100)(0.02) 1 0.98 =100, which is also the value of TVaR 0.98. Finally, for δ =0.99, we have δ =1 and VaR 0.99 =100,sothatCTE 0.99 =VaR 0.99 = 100. On the other hand, we have TVaR 0.99 = 1 1 0.99 Z 1 0.99 VaR ξ dξ = (100)(0.01) 0.01 =100. 17

4.5 More Premium-Based Risk Measure 4.5.1 Proportional hazard transform and risk-adjusted premium The premium-based risk measures define risk based on a loading of the expected loss. The expected loss μ X of a continuous random loss X can be written as μ X = Z 0 S X (x) dx. (4.27) Thus, instead of adding a loading to μ X to obtain a premium we may re-define the distribution of the loss. Suppose X is distributed with sf S X (x) =[S X(x)] 1 ρ,whereρ 1, then the mean of X is E( X) =μ X = Z 0 S X(x) dx = 18 Z 0 [S X (x)] 1 ρ dx. (4.28)

The parameter ρ is called the risk-aversion index. The distribution of X is called the proportional hazard (PH) transform of the distribution of X with parameter ρ. If we denote h X (x) andh X(x) as the hf of X and X, respectively, then from equations (2.2) and (2.3), we have h X(x) = 1 Ã ds X (x)! S X(x) dx = 1 [S X(x)] 1 ρ 1 SX(x) 0 ρ [S X (x)] 1 ρ = 1 Ã! S 0 X (x) ρ S X (x) = 1 ρ h X(x), (4.30) 19

so that the hf of X is proportional to the hf of X. As ρ 1, the hf of X is less than that of X, implying that X has a thicker tail than that of X. Also,S X(x) =[S X (x)] 1 ρ declines slower than S X (x) sothatμ X > μ X, the difference of which represents the loading. Example 4.7: If X E(λ), find the PH transform of X with parameter ρ and the risk-adjusted premium. Solution: The sf of X is S X (x) =e λx. Thus, the sf of the PH transform is S X (x) =³ e λx 1 ρ = e λ ρ x, which implies X E(λ/ρ). Hence, the riskadjusted premium is E( X) =ρ/λ 1/λ =E(X). Example 4.8: If X P(α, γ) withα > 1, find the PH transform of X with parameter ρ [1, α) and the risk-adjusted premium. 20

Solution: The sf of X is S X (x) = Ã γ γ + x! α, with mean The sf of X is μ X = γ α 1. Ã! α S X(x) =[S X (x)] 1 ρ γ ρ =, γ + x so that X P(α/ρ, γ). Hence, the mean of X (the risk-adjusted premium) is μ X = α γ ρ 1 = ργ α ρ > γ α 1 = μ X. 21

1 0.9 0.8 Loss variable: exponential PH transform, rho = 1.5 PH transform, rho = 2.0 Probability density function 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Loss variable

2 1.8 1.6 Loss variable: Pareto PH transform, rho = 2 PH transform, rho = 3 Probability density function 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Loss variable

4.6 The Distortion-Function Approach The distortion function is a mathematical device to construct risk measures. Definition 4.2: A distortion function is a nondecreasing function g( ) satisfying g(1) = 1 and g(0) = 0. Suppose X isalossrandomvariablewithsfs X (x). As the distortion function g( ) is nondecreasing and S X (x) is a nonincreasing function of x, g(s X (x)) is a nonincreasing function of x. Together with the property that g(s X (0)) = g(1) = 1 and g(s X ( )) = g(0) = 0, g(s X (x))isawelldefined sf over the support [0, ). 22

We denote the random variable with this sf as X, which may be interpreted as a risk-adjusted loss random variable, and g(s X (x)) is the risk adjusted sf. We further assume that g( ) isconcavedown(i.e.,g 00 (x) 0ifthe derivative exists). Definition 4.3: Let X be a nonnegative loss random variable. The distortion risk measure based on the distortion function g( ), denoted by (X), is defined as Z (X) = g(s X (x)) dx. (4.42) 0 Thus, the distortion risk measure (X) is the mean of the risk-adjusted loss X. The class of distortion risk measures include the following measures we have discussed. 23

Pure premium risk measure It can be seen easily by defining g(u) =u, (4.43) which satisfies the conditions g(0) = 0 and g(1) = 1, and g( ) is nondecreasing. Now (X) = Z 0 g(s X (x)) dx = Z 0 S X (x) dx = μ X, (4.44) which is the pure premium risk measure. Proportional hazard risk-adjusted premium risk measure This can be seen by defining g(u) =u 1 ρ, ρ 1. (4.45) 24

VaR risk measure For VaR δ we define the distortion function as g(s X (x)) = which is equivalent to ( 0, if 0 SX (x) < 1 δ, 1, if 1 δ S X (x) 1, (4.46) g(s X (x)) = ( 0, if x>varδ, 1, if 0 x VaR δ. (4.47) Hence, (X) = CTE risk measure Z 0 g(s X (x)) dx = Z VaRδ 0 dx =VaR δ. (4.48) For CTE δ we define the distortion function as (subject to the condition 25

X is continuous) g(s X (x)) = S X (x) 1 δ, if 0 S X(x) < 1 δ, (4.49) 1, if 1 δ S X (x) 1, which is equivalent to g(s X (x)) = S X (x) 1 δ, if x>x δ, (4.50) 1, if 0 x x δ. Theorem 4.1: Let g( ) be a concave-down distortion function. The risk measure of the loss X defined in equation (4.42) is translational invariant, monotonic, positively homogeneous and subadditive, and is thus coherent. 26