PW Parkway ES Prince William County, Virginia WSSI #

Similar documents
ACTON COMMUNITY WIDE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY. Town of Acton and PAL, Inc.

Additional Testing for Padre Dam Eastern Service Area Secondary Connection- Alternative Site Location, San Diego County, California

4.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES

ADDITIONAL PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE UMORE PARK SAND AND GRAVEL MINING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA

Archaeological Survey and Evaluation at 8954 El Dorado Parkway, El Cajon, San Diego County, California

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE EASTHAM STATE PRISON FARM UNIT PROJECT IN HOUSTON COUNTY TEXAS

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request

Project Background. March 9, Commissioners of Public Works 103 Saint Phillip Street Charleston, South Carolina 29203

December 13, Kirk Shields Green Mountain Power 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446

COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Management Data Form Rev. 11/10

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE DCP MIDSTREAM THREE RIVERS PLANT TO CGP 51 PROJECT IN LIVE OAK COUNTY, TEXAS

MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MISSOURI STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE (SHPO) ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORDATION

GUIDELINES FOR SITE AND UPDATE FORMS. 1. Site forms in a database format should be filed with the Illinois State Museum (ISM).

Phase II: Evaluation According to National Register Criteria

Archaeological Survey and Assessment of Four Wastewater Interceptor Routes in Garner, Wake Co., N.C. (EPA C )

City of Lockport Historic Resources Survey - Section METHODOLOGY

RE: End of Field Letter for the Proposed Milton Mears Farm Road Solar Project, Milton, Chittenden County, Vermont

A. My name is Watsun Randolph and my business address is 45 Horner Street Warrenton

Appendix I-1: Archaeological Records Search

Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions)

GIS and Predictive Modeling: Identifying North Carolina s Historic Archaeological Resources

73-2 have been satisfied; and

SITE SUMMARY REPORT Candor Dump NONCD Montgomery County

APPENDIX 1 LITTLE EGYPT FROM THE AIR

GIS for Surveyors: Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc.

August 14, James Bolton 312 Perry Lane Lovingston, VA

Geospatial Data Model for Archaeology Site Data

EN-POLICY 1: Consider environmental concerns at all levels of land use-related decision-making.

ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Streamlining Environmental Assessment through GIS

Historic Cultural Properties Inventory (HCPI) Base Form (FORM 1)

Data Dictionary for Network of Conservation Areas Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

1.0 PURPOSE AND FORMAT OF THE FINAL EIR

Archaeological Monitoring of Construction of a Six-Inch Force Main Sewer over Lookout Creek, Chattanooga, Hamilton County, Tennessee

Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02G04: Commerce/Trade - tavern 14D09: Transportation automotive service

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

TOWN OF SEVERANCE, COLORADO. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR A PROJECT Hunters Crossing Annexation & Zoning

4.11 CULTURAL RESOURCES

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

CONGLETON INDUSTRIAL PARK LT 6 EX W 300' & E 350' LT 7 BLK 1, a subdivision of land in the City of Overland Park, Johnson County, Kansas.

February 14, Dear Mr. Kirchen:

Aerial Photography and Imagery Resources Guide

Historic Cultural Properties Inventory (HCPI) Base Form (FORM 1)

ZIP Code Tabulation Areas For Census 2000

MVP WMS, George Schorr

Aerial Photography and Imagery Resources Guide

CHAPTER 12 Archaeological Survey at Quinney Farm and Papcke Fields, Walworth County by Jocelyn Boor, Kira Kaufmann, Robert J.

Part 1: Buildings to be Demolished. Submitted to

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

CITY OF PORTLAND, TEXAS SERVICE PLAN FOR ANNEXATION AREA

Using West Virginia GeoExplorer's Historical Gazetteer Feature

List of Sites in District 2C Source Number

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

GIS SERVICE CENTER MAP ORDER FORM

CHAPTER 4. Blue Heron Site (47Je1001) 2003 Investigations. By Chrisie L. Hunter

Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference. Monday, February 12, 2007

Minimum Standards for Wetland Delineations

NOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 28. PHYSIOGRAPHY Cook Inlet Drainages

Appendix 7A. Cultural Resources Documentation

Community Erosion Assessment Napakiak, Alaska 15 January 2008

Jason Bentley Ashe Prelim_Research_Notebook_Data MDS_I Fall_2007

Wessinger Road, Hilton Area Chapin, South Carolina

Advanced Geologic Exploration, Inc.

SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING

Erosion Information Paper Eagle City and Eagle Village, Alaska Current as of January 21, 2008

Application #: TEXT

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10

Data Dictionary for Potential Conservation Area Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Lecture 9: Reference Maps & Aerial Photography

NAME DATE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS. Activity 1: Topographic Map Investigation I: More Than a Road Map

Appendix I Feasibility Study for Vernal Pool and Swale Complex Mapping

What Do You See? FOR 274: Forest Measurements and Inventory. Area Determination: Frequency and Cover

PUP R-4 R-3 R-4 R-3 R-4 B-1 B-3 B-1 B-1 B-1 R-3 C-1 R-3 R-3 A-1 M-2C SUBJECT PROPERTY B-3 R-5 B-3C B-3C B-3C B-3C B-2.

Archaeological Report Guidelines

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map

Geophysical Investigation of a 19th Century Archeological Site, Boston College K. Corcoran, J. Hager, M. Carnevale

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

Photographs to Maps Using Aerial Photographs to Create Land Cover Maps

Historic Cultural Properties Inventory (HCPI) Base Form (FORM 1)

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

NEWS RELEASE UNDER SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (33 USC 1344) ACTION NUMBER SPA ABQ

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED VETERANS RETIREMENT HOME PROJECT IN CENTRAL SOMERVELL COUNTY, TEXAS. Texas Antiquities Permit Number 2950

Lab Topographic Maps. Name: Partner: Purpose. Background Information

Lecture Outline. Geography 12: Maps and Mapping. Review questions. Review questions. Large and Small Scale Maps. Large and Small Scale Maps

Cultural Resources Data

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

SCI appreciates being of service to you on this project. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this report.

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

2. Construction of a Topographic Profile. State the vertical scale and vertical exaggeration in the spaces provided.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Winning Farm of Winchester

UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

THE HISTORY OF WEATHER OBSERVING IN CHEYENNE, WYOMING,

Historic Cultural Properties Inventory (HCPI) Base Form (FORM 1)

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS

±3.18 AC. 512 Rebecca Drive Leesville, South Carolina. Lakefront Lot. Property Features. For more information:

Schuyler County Idle Farmland Analysis. Conducted by Cornell Cooperative Extension of Schuyler County

In order to give all interested parties an opportunity to express their views

Transcription:

PW Parkway ES Prince William County, Virginia WSSI #15.3 Cultural Resources Site Assessment November 15 Prepared for: Prince William County Public Schools P.O. Box 39 Manassas, Virginia 1 Prepared by: 53 Wellington Branch Drive, Suite 1 Gainesville, Virginia 155 Tel: 73 79 5 Email: contactus@wetlandstudies.com www.wetlandstudies.com

Cultural Resources Site Assessment PW Parkway ES (5± acres) WSSI #15.3 INTRODUCTION This transmittal presents an evaluation of the potential for locating cultural resources on the ±5-acre study area on the PW Parkway ES study area located southeast of the intersection of Prince William Parkway and Old Bridge Road and immediately south of Chinn Park Drive in Prince William County, Virginia (Exhibit 1 and ). The study area is located within a ±77-acre parcel and contains a previously undeveloped forest. The area is drained to the east by Crooked Run and an unnamed tributary, which flows into Crooked Run. The study area vicinity includes Chinn Park Recreation Center to the northwest, residential development to the north and south, and playing fields and forests to the east and west. KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES IN OR NEAR THE PROJECT AREA The following inventory of previously recorded cultural resources within and near the project area was established by using the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHRs) online Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V-CRIS), as well as examining cultural resource files and reports at the Thunderbird Archeology office in Gainesville, Virginia. No archeological sites or architectural resources have been recorded within the current study area. One archeological site and seven architectural resources have been identified within a one-mile radius of the project area (Tables 1 and ). Exhibit 3 shows the locations of these cultural resources. Archeological Site PW199 is located within Chinn Park immediately north of the study area. The prehistoric site contained quartz debris found in three shovel test pits, two of which showed signs of ground disturbance. No cultural features, flakes, flake tools, or shaped tools were found. The site lacked diagnostic artifacts and could not be dated to a specific time period. It was recommended that the site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). No additional archaeological work was recommended. Three of the seven previously recorded architectural resources within a one mile radius of the study area are no longer extant. Three cemeteries were recorded over one-quarter of a mile from the project area. These are not recommended eligible to the NRHP and have not been evaluated by DHR. One circa 197 house was recorded and recommended not eligible because it does not meet the NRHP 5-years of age requirement and is not exceptional. PW Parkway ES - Cultural Resources Site Assessment WSSI #15.3 November 15 Page 1

TABLE 1: Previously Recorded Archeological Sites within a One Mile Radius of the Study Area National DHR Site Site Type Temporal Affiliation Register Number Eligibility PW199 Lithic Scatter Prehistoric/Unknown Not Evaluated TABLE : Previously Recorded Architectural Resources within a One Mile Radius of the Study Area DHR Resource Number Resource Name Resource Type Temporal Affiliation National Register Eligibility 7-1 Fairview School School/Dwelling ca. 177 Destroyed 7-9 Reed Cemetery, Reid Cemetery Cemetery ca. 1 Not Evaluated 7-51 Marshall Cemetery Cemetery 19-19 Not Evaluated 7-51 House, 1 Haversack Lane Dwelling ca. 1955 Destroyed 7-5 House, 11 Haversack Lane Dwelling ca. 197 Not Evaluated 7-53 Farmstead, 1 Dwelling and Haversack Lane Outbuildings ca. 195 Destroyed 7-5 Holland Family Cemetery Cemetery 197-1973 Not Evaluated ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE PROBABILITY The following presents an assessment of the probability that archeological sites will occur within the study area based on topography, drainage, the presence of roads and historic map projection. This has not been field verified. The probability for locating prehistoric sites generally depends on the variables of topography, proximity to water, and internal drainage. Sites are more likely on welldrained landforms of low relief in proximity to water. The probability for the occurrence of historic period sites largely depends upon the historic map search, the history of settlement in the area, the topography and the proximity of a particular property to historic roads. However, the absence of structures on historic maps does not eliminate the possibility of an archeological site being present within the property as it was common for tenant, slave, and African-American properties to be excluded from these maps. There is a moderate to high probability of locating prehistoric period archeological resources within the study area due to the presence of low-relief, well-drained topography within the study area and sources of fresh water in the vicinity, and the previous PW Parkway ES - Cultural Resources Site Assessment WSSI #15.3 November 15 Page

recordation of one prehistoric period archeological resource within the park. Historic maps and aerial photographs show no buildings in the study area; however, land adjacent to the project area to the southwest was occupied and farmed by a Hothkiss before or during the Civil War (McDowell 1). According to USGS quadrangle topographic maps, the dwelling was destroyed between 19 and 19. Based on our review of available historic maps, several roads, farms and dwellings were present in the study area vicinity by the time of the Civil War; one dwelling appears near the project area during this period. As such, and due to the presence of arable land within study area; there is a moderate to high probability of locating historic period archeological resources within its boundaries. Exhibit shows the locations within the study area assessed with medium and high probability for the presence of archeological sites. Based on a review of recent topographic maps and aerial photography, we have assumed that some locations that might otherwise have a moderate to high probability for the occurrence of archeological sites have been disturbed. RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the moderate to high probability for locating archeological resources within portions of the study area, we recommend that a Phase I cultural resources (archeological) investigation be conducted. If prehistoric sites are present in the upland portions of the study area, deposits will likely to be confined to plowed strata and are not likely to require work beyond the recordation done at the Phase I level. Plowing disturbs the context of the Native American artifacts, thus reducing the information potential of a particular site. Historic period archeological sites dating to the 19 th century or earlier, if present within the study area, will likely require additional archeological work. This is particularly true of enslaved African American or tenant occupation sites, as these site types have been less intensively studied. Archeological sites dating to the th century are not likely to be considered significant unless they contain unique, intact cultural materials that would contribute new research information. Sincerely, THUNDERBIRD ARCHEOLOGY A Division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc. Boyd Sipe, M.A., RPA Manager - Archeology L:\1s\13\15.3\Admin\3-ARCH\15-11-11_PW_PKWY_Site_Assess.docx PW Parkway ES - Cultural Resources Site Assessment WSSI #15.3 November 15 Page 3

L:\Proposals\GIS\15\ChinnPark\ARCH\1_VicinityADC.mxd Prince William County Project Area Copyright ADC The Map People Permitted Use Number 7111, Feet Original Scale: 1 " =, ' Exhibit 1 Vicinity Map PW Parkway ESC- Cultural Resources Site Assessment WSSI # 15.3 - November 15 Page

L:\Proposals\GIS\15\ChinnPark\ARCH\_USGS.mxd Project Area Latitude: 3 '9'' N Longitude: 77 19''' W, Feet Original Scale: 1 " =, ' Exhibit USGS Quad Map Occoquan, VA 199 PWCParkway ES - Cultural Re- Cultural Resources Site Assessment WSSI # 15.3 - November 15 Page 5

L:\Proposals\GIS\15\ChinnPark\ARCH\B_VDHR.mxd PW17 PW173 7-513 PW17 7-1 7-5 7-51 PW199 7-51 7-5 7-9 7-53 Historic Overlay Districts VDHR Architectural Resource* VDHR Archeological Site* 7-5 Archeological Site PW199 (Digitized from V-CRIS by WSSI) Project Area 1 Mile Radius From Center of Project Area Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) data: January 3, 15 Photo Source: Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc. - 1 Natural Color Imagery *The recipient of this data understands and acknowledges that release of precise locations may threaten archeological and historic resources. Locations of cultural resources may be sensitive per Code of Virginia.-375.7 (1), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA). The recipient of this data shall take reasonable PW precautions to ensure the security of site locations. 1,5 Feet Original Scale: 1 " = 1,5 ' Exhibit DHR Architectural Resources and Archeological Sites Map PW Parkway ES - Cultural Re- Cultural Resources Site Assessment C WSSI # 15.3 - November 15 Page

7 7 7 5 5 5 5 7 9 9 3 9 9 3 RD 3 SS EL L RU 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 7 9 9 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 Feet Original Scale: 1 " = ' Exhibit Moderate to High Probability Areas for Cultural Resources PW Parkway ES - Cultural Resources Site Assessment WSSI #15.3 - November 15 3 3 Moderate to High Probability Areas: ± ac. 3 Approximate School Study Area: ±15 ac. 3 Chinn Park Property: ±77 ac. 3 3 3 9 3 3 PY 3 3 3 M 3 3 9 3 W IL LI A 3 3 E 3 3 3 3 3 PR IN C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 7 7 5 5 7 9 3 3 3 7 7 7 9 3 3 3 9 7 7 3 3 9 7 7 7 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 7 9 3 7 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 37 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 9 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 L:\Proposals\GIS\15\ChinnPark\ARCH\1_Probability.mxd Page 7