Event geometrical anisotropy and fluctuation viewed by HBT interferometry

Similar documents
Final source eccentricity measured by HBT interferometry with the event shape selection

Global and Collective Dynamics at PHENIX

Azimuthal angle dependence of HBT radii with respect to the Event Plane in Au+Au collisions at PHENIX

Soft physics results from the PHENIX experiment

Monte Carlo Non-Linear Flow modes studies with AMPT

Small Collision Systems at RHIC

Azimuthal anisotropy of the identified charged hadrons in Au+Au collisions at S NN. = GeV at RHIC

Low Momentum Direct Photons in Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV and 62.4 GeV measured by the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC

Quantifying the Sensitivity of Experimental Data to Variations in the QGP Equation of State

Assessment of triangular flow in jet background fluctuations for Au+Au collisions First look at dijet imbalance (A J )

Conference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 11 Aug 2013

Measurement of Quantum Interference of Two Identical Particles with respect to the Event Plane in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at RHIC-PHENIX

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 6 Dec 2011

Global variables and identified hadrons in the PHENIX experiment

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 7 Jan 2019

Angular correlations of identified particles in the STAR BES data

Heavy Ion Results from the ALICE Experiment

Event by Event Flow in ATLAS and CMS

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 28 Nov 2017

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 24 Sep 2012

Pion Transverse Momentum Spectrum, Elliptic Flow and Interferometry in the Granular Source Model in Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

High-p T Neutral Pion Production in Heavy Ion Collisions at SPS and RHIC

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 22 Apr 2015

Uncertainties in the underlying e-by-e viscous fluid simulation

Azimuthally-sensitive pion HBT in STAR

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 12 May 2008

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v1 21 Dec 2004

Searches for Chiral Effects and Prospects for Isobaric Collisions at STAR/RHIC

arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 11 Jul 2014

Flow of strange and charged particles in ppb and PbPb collisions at LHC energies

Overview of flow results from ALICE experiment

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collision Results

Recent results from the STAR experiment on Vector Meson production in ultra peripheral AuAu collisions at RHIC.

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v1 10 May 2004

Photon and neutral meson production in pp and PbPb collisions at ALICE

Particle correlations in such collision?! N=n(n-1)/2. azimuthal, back-to back, multiplicity... close velocity,

arxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 8 Sep 2016

The measurement of non-photonic electrons in STAR

FFiinnaall ssoouurrccee eecccceennttrriicciittyy mmeeaassuurreedd bbyy HHBBTT iinntteerrffeerroommeettrryy wwiitthh tthhee eevveenntt sshhaappee

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 Jan 2016

Di muons and the detection of J/psi, Upsilon and Z 0 Jets and the phenomenon of jet quenching

Hydrodynamical description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

Recent Results from RHIC: On the trail of the Quark-Gluon Plasma

Correlations of Electrons from Heavy Flavor Decay with Hadrons in Au+Au and p+p Collisions arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 11 Jul 2011

Highlights of experimental results from ALICE

Azimuthal distributions of high-pt direct and 0. at STAR

Further development of the hydrokinetic model and description of the RHIC and LHC A+A femtoscopic data

First results with heavy-ion collisions at the LHC with ALICE

Outline: Introduction and Motivation

LHC: Status and Highlights

Lecture 12: Hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions. Elliptic flow Last lecture we learned:

Review of collective flow at RHIC and LHC

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 10 Jan 2019

Recent highlights from STAR

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 8 Aug 2002

Predictions for hadronic observables from. from a simple kinematic model

Proton-lead measurements using the ATLAS detector

Heavy Ions at the LHC: First Results

Overview of anisotropic flow measurements from ALICE

Inclusive spectrum of charged jets in central Au+Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV by STAR

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 11 Jul 2011

snn = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions with the STAR experiment

PHENIX measurements of bottom and charm quark production

Helena Santos, for the ATLAS Collaboration LIP - Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas

Conference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

The balance function in azimuthal angle is a measure of the transverse flow

Lepton and Charm Measurements in the First Two Years of RHIC: An Experimental Overview

Selected Topics in the Theory of Heavy Ion Collisions Lecture 1

Strangeness production and nuclear modification at LHC energies

Latest results on heavy flavor di-lepton (p-pb and Pb-Pb)

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 10 Feb 2012

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 15 Jun 2017

67. W.M. Snow et al. (M. Sarsour), NSR collaboration, Parity violating neutron spin rotation in He-4 and H., Nuovo Cim. C035N04, (2012).

Perfect-fluid hydrodynamics for RHIC successes and problems

Quarkonium production measurement in Pb-Pb collisions at forward and mid rapidity with the ALICE experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 18 May 2015

Correlations and Fluctuations in Nuclear Collisions - Experimental Overview

Jet Physics with ALICE

STRANGENESS PRODUCTION IN HEAVY ION COLLISIONS AT RELATIVISTIC ENERGIES *

arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 17 Jun 2015

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 14 Oct 2013

Physics with the ALICE experiment

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 13 Jun 2013

Nearly Perfect Fluidity: From Cold Atoms to Hot Quarks. Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University

Flow Harmonic Probability Distribution in Heavy Ion Collision

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 6 Jan 2016

Jet quenching in PbPb collisions in CMS

Conference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 10 Jan 2009

Partonic transport simulations of jet quenching

Quark-Gluon Plasma Physics

The Core Corona Model

Elliptic flow. p y. Non-central collision of spherical nuclei or central collision of deformed nuclei. Overlapping zone is of almond shape

11th International Workshop on High-pT Physics in the RHIC & LHC Era

Creating a Quark Gluon Plasma With Heavy Ion Collisions

Introduction to Heavy Ion Physics at the LHC

Event-by-event distribution of azimuthal asymmetries in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

PoS(CFRNC2006)014. Fluctuation studies in STAR. Supriya Das (for the STAR Collaboration)

Transcription:

Event geometrical anisotropy and fluctuation viewed by HB interferometry akafumi Niida University of sukuba -- ennoudai, sukuba, Ibaraki 35-857, Japan Abstract Azimuthal angle dependence of the pion source radii was measured applying the event shape selection at the PHENIX experiment. he measured final source eccentricity is found to be enhanced when selecting events with higher magnitude of the second-order flow vector, as well as the elliptic flow coefficient v. he spatial twist of the particle-emitting source was also explored using a transport model. Results indicate a possible twisted source in the final state due to the initial longitudinal fluctuations. Introduction Higher-order flow coefficients v n are useful observables to constrain the properties of the quark-gluon plasma, such as a shear viscosity over entropy density ratio, in heavy ion collisions [,. he v n are found to largely fluctuate in each event even if the collision centrality is fixed [3, which is due to the initial spatial fluctuation of participating nucleons. o control such event-by-event initial fluctuations, the event shape engineering was suggested [4. he event shape engineering can be performed by selecting the magnitude of the event flow vector Q : Q = q,x + q,y / M, () q,x = i w i cos(φ i ), q,y = i w i sin(φ i ), 7

Journal of Central European Green Innovation 4(4) pp 7- (6) where M is the particle multiplicity, φ i is the azimuthal angle of particles, and w i is a weight for particle i. he magnitude of Q is proportional to the strength of eventby-event v and also reflects the resolution of the second order event plane. his technique could allow us to test the effect of the initial geometry on the final state distribution of emitted particles, which help to understand the medium response through the system evolution. he event shape engineering focuses on the fluctuations in the transverse plane. It is naturally considered that there would be the fluctuations not only in the transverse plane but also in the longitudinal direction. he presence of such fluctuations could cause a twisted source along the longitudinal direction [5. he number of participants going to the forward and backward directions would be different, and therefore participant planes might also be different. As a result, the event plane angle in the final state could be different between the forward and backward angles. hus the initial spatial twist may survive in the final state as well as a twisted flow [8, 9. In this proceedings, we present results on HB measurements using charged pions and applying the event shape engineering technique for Au+Au collisions at snn = GeV recorded with the PHENIX experiment. Also, we examine the possibility of a spatially twisted source in the final state using HB interferometry in AMP model. he event shape engineering at the PHENIX he flow vector was determined by the Reaction Plane Detector (RXN, < η <.8). In our analysis, the w i in Eq. () reflects the multiplicity or energy measured in a segment i of the RXN and M is w i. he tracking for charged particles was performed by the Drift Chamber and the Pad Chamber, and the particle identification was done by the electromagnetic calorimeter, where they have the acceptance of η <.35 and φ < π/ in the west and east central arms. he measured Q distributions were fitted with the Bessel-Gaussian function [4, and then the events were classified with the magnitude of Q. Figure shows charged hadron v for the higher % and the lower 3% Q events. Results without Q selection are also plotted for the comparison. he effect of Q selection v. Q -RXN.SN -% no Q selection lower Q 3% higher Q % Au+Au GeV -% -3% 3-6%. 4 4 4 4 Figure : Charged hadron v as a function of p for four centrally bins with and without the Q selection in Au+Au GeV collisions. he lower and higher Q events were selected. on the v is clearly observed, that is, the higher (lower) Q enhances (decreases) 8

Journal of Central European Green Innovation 4(4) pp 7- (6) the strength of v compared to the v without the Q selection. hen the Q selection was applied to the HB measurements using charged pion pairs. In the HB analysis, pion pairs were analyzed with the out-side-long parameterization [, in the longitudinally co-moving system. he effect of the event plane resolution was also corrected for both cases with and without Q selection. Figure (left) shows the extracted pion HB radii, Rs and Ro, as a function of azimuthal pair angle φ relative to the second-order event plane Ψ. Results show that the higher Q selection increases the oscillation strength compared to the case without Q selection. hese oscillations of HB radii are supposed to be sensitive to the final source eccentricity at freeze-out, ε final. Blast-wave studies suggest that the quantity of Rs,/R s, would be a good probe of ε final in the limit of k =, where k denotes a mean transverse momentum of pairs. he oscillation amplitudes of Rs and Ro in a form of the final eccentricity are plotted as a function of the number of participants calculated by Glauber model in Fig. (right). he higher Q selection enhances the measured ε final as well as v. It could be originating from a larger initial eccentricity, although there should be a bias from selecting the larger v events because the radii modulations also depend on the anisotropy in the momentum space [6, 7. R s 5 Q -RXN.SN no Q selection higher Q % 5 R o 5 5 - - Au+Au GeV, π + π + +π π /R ν, R µ,. µ=s, ν=s µ=o, ν=o Q -RXN.SN no Q selection higher Q % /R ν, R µ,. µ=os, ν=s µ=o, ν=s Au+Au GeV -. -. 3 φ - Ψ [rad 3 φ - Ψ [rad 3 N part 3 N part Figure : (Left and center) Azimuthal angle dependence of R s and R o relative to Ψ. (Right) nd -order azimuthal oscillation on R s and R o. In both panels, results with and without higher Q selection are shown. 3 Study on the event twist effect he data of Pb+Pb.76 ev collisions simulated using a Multi Phase ransport Model (AMP, v.5 with string melting) were used for the study on the twist effect of the particle-emitting source in the final state. he impact parameter was fixed to 8 fm. For the HB study, the interference effect between two identical particles, + cos( r p), was calculated and weighted to the relative pair momentum distributions. hen the correlation functions were reconstructed by taking a ratio of the distributions with and without the weight. Also, all charged pions were allowed to make a pair with each other including π + π to increase the statistics (the consistency between results for positive and negative pairs was checked). he event plane was determined using particles in 4 < η < 6, where particles were 9

Journal of Central European Green Innovation 4(4) pp 7- (6) divided into two sub-groups. A set of forward and backward event planes (Ψ F, Ψ B ) were used for the event cut which requires finite difference between Ψ F and Ψ B as a event twist selection, whereas the other set of event planes was used for a reference angle of azimuthal HB measurements. he effect of the event plane resolution was not taken into account in this study, assuming the resolution hardly affects the phase of the radii oscillations but the magnitude of the oscillations. Figure 3 shows Rs, Ro, and Ros as a function of azimuthal pair angle relative to the Ψ B ( φ) for four η regions, where (Ψ B Ψ F ) >.6 was required. he oscillations of the HB radii measured in η > are shifted to the direction of φ <, which is the direction of Ψ F in the current event cut. his phase shift can be understood to be a possible twist effect in the final source distribution. he radii oscillations measured in η < have no phase shift because the negative η is closer to the backward angle used for a reference of the HB measurement and therefore the twist effect is supposed to be small. Figure 4 shows all the extracted radii parameters measured with respect to Ψ B and Ψ F with the event cut of (Ψ B Ψ F ) >.6. he phase shift can be seen in the transverse radii (not in the longitudinal radii including the cross terms) when comparing the results for Ψ B and Ψ F in the same η region. It indicates the twist of the event plane angles in the backward and forward angles. hese oscillations were fitted with the following functions: R µ( φ) = R µ, + R µ, cos( φ + α) (for µ = o, s), () R µ( φ) = R µ, + R µ, sin( φ + α) (for µ = os), (3) to extract the magnitude of the phase shift (α). he phase shift parameter α obtained from the results with respect to Ψ F and Ψ B is plotted as a function of η in Fig. 4. he α increases going from backward to forward angle in all cases. he variation of α in the η dependence is comparable to the difference between results relative to Ψ F and Ψ B at the same η. he finite slope in the η dependence of α indicates the twisted source in the final state due to the initial longitudinal fluctuations, as well as the twisted event plane and flow as discussed in Ref. [8, 9. In this study, the effect of the event plane resolution is assumed to be negligible, but there should be an uncertainty derived from the event cut of (Ψ B Ψ F ) and their finite event plane resolutions. R s 9 AMP Pb+Pb.76eV, ππ.<k < GeV/c, EP: -6<η<-4 R o 7 6 B F (Ψ -Ψ )>.6 R os 8 3 φ [rad 5 4-3.5< η<-.5.5<η<3.5 -.5< η<-.5.5<η<.5 3 φ [rad - 3 φ [rad Figure 3: Azimuthal angle dependence of Rs, Ro, and Ros relative to the backward Ψ AMP Pb+Pb.76eV ππ-hb with the event cut of (Ψ B Ψ F ) >.6, where the dashed lines show.<k < GeV/c, EP: 4<η<6 Ros = and the dotted lines show φ = π/. -3.5< η<-.5.5<η<3.5 -.5< η<-.5.5<η<.5 -.5< η<.5.5<η<.5 -.5<η<.5

Journal of Central European Green Innovation 4(4) pp 7- (6) R side 4 8 6.5.5.5 3 [rad R out 8 6 4 B B ( - )>.6.5.5.5 3 [rad R long 5 AMP Pb+Pb.76eV.5.5.5 3 [rad R os 4 R os = R ol R sl B w.r.t (-6< <-4) -3.5< <-.5 -.5< <-.5 -.5< <-.5 -.5< <.5.5.5.5 3 [rad - -.5.5.5 3 [rad F - w.r.t (4< <6) -3.5< <-.5 -.5< <-.5 -.5< <-.5 -.5< <.5 -.5.5.5 3 [rad Figure 4: Azimuthal angle dependence of the radii parameters relative to the backward and forward Ψ with the event cut of (Ψ B Ψ F ) >.6, where the dashed lines show R os =. 4 Summary We presented the results of HB measurements using the event shape engineering for Au+Au collisions at s NN = GeV at the PHENIX experiment. We found that the higher Q selection enhances the measured final source eccentricity as well as v. Although the model comparison is needed to disentangle both spatial and dynamical effects on the HB radii, this study would clarify the relation between the initial and final source eccentricities and constrain better the system dynamics. We also studied the event twist effect using AMP model. When selecting events with finite difference between forward and backward event plane angles, the oscillations of HB radii are shifted in the phase and the phase shift increases with η. he results indicate a possible twisted source in the final state preserving the initial twist due to the longitudinal fluctuations. his effect might be measured in experiments at RHIC and the LHC. Both techniques could be useful to probe and control initial fluctuations in transverse plane and longitudinal directions, as well as to study the response of the system to the space-time evolution. References [ A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 53 (). [ C. Gale, S. Jeon, B. Schenke, P. ribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 3 (3). [3 G. Aad et al. (ALAS Collaboration), JHEP (3) 83.

Journal of Central European Green Innovation 4(4) pp 7- (6) [rad α side.6.4. [rad α out.6.4. B F (Ψ -Ψ )>.6 [rad α os.6.4. AMP Pb+Pb.76eV -. -. -. -.4 -.4 -.4 B w.r.t Ψ F w.r.t Ψ -.6-3 - - 3 η -.6-3 - - 3 η -.6-3 - - 3 η Figure 5: Phase shift parameters α obtained from the R s, R o, and R os as a function of η. Results measured with respect to forward and backward event planes (Ψ F, Ψ B ) are shown, with the event cut of (Ψ B Ψ F ) >.6. [4 J. Schukraft, A. immins, and S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 79, 394 (3). [5 P. Bożek, W. Broniowski, and J. Moreira, Phys. Rev. C 83, 349 (). [6 F. Retière and M. A. Lisa, Phys. Rev. C 7, 4497 (4). [7 C. J. Plumberg, C. Shen, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 88, 4494 (3). [8 J. Jia and P. Huo, Phys. Rev. C 9, 3495 (4). [9 J. Jia and P. Huo, Phys. Rev. C 9, 3495 (4). [ S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. D 33, 7 (986). [ G. Bertsch, M. Gong, and M. ohyama, Phys. Rev. C 37, 896 (988).