Q1-Q CEOS Seismic Pilot report. CEOS Thematic Pilots

Similar documents
The Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories (GSNL).

Status Report on the Seismic Hazards Pilot

Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories

CEOS Support to the Geohazard Supersites

Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories

GEO-VIII November Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Progress Report. Document 9

The Geohazards Lab. CEOS WG Disasters. CEOS Disaster Risk Management. CEOS WG Disasters 10 th meeting

CEOS WG Disasters Report

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

Volcano Monitoring on a Regional Scale:

The Geohazards Lab. Proposition to the CEOS WG Disasters: CEOS Disaster Risk Management. CEOS WG Disasters meeting, March 2017

The Polar Ice Sheets Monitoring Project A Coordinated Response from Space Agencies

Ivana Zinno, Francesco Casu, Claudio De Luca, Riccardo Lanari, Michele Manunta. CNR IREA, Napoli, Italy

Status Report on the Seismic Hazards Pilot

Earth Observatory of Singapore. Nina Lin 22 Jan 2018

INGV. Giuseppe Pezzo. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, CNT, Roma. Sessione 1.1: Terremoti e le loro faglie

DLR s TerraSAR-X contributes to international fleet of radar satellites to map the Arctic and Antarctica

Terrafirma Extension Tectonic Theme. 6 th Terrafirma Workshop ESA-ESRIN, December 1st, 2010

Committee on Earth Observation Satellites. The CEOS Volcano Demonstrator Rationale and Implementation

Ground surface deformation of L Aquila. earthquake revealed by InSAR time series

Volcanoes Session. Chairs: Y. Fukushima & G. Puglisi

Photo credit: S Dumont

A new era of geodetic big data - challenges and opportunities Tim Wright (COMET, University of

CEOS Volcano Pilot Overview 7 October, 2014

The Tohoku Earthquake 2011 Case.

Gets Boost from a New Satellite

Infrastructure monitoring using SAR interferometry

The Italian Supersites Volcanoes: a long-term monitoring experiment in active volcanic areas prone to natural hazard

Source identification for situational awareness of the August 24 th 2016 Central Italy event

The Greek Supersite: An initiative from the most tectonically active part of Europe

UN COPUOS 52 nd session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee. COPERNICUS - an European Achievement. S. Jutz Head, ESA Copernicus Space Office

6.0 TDMT, M W. IREA-CNR, Napoli, Italy 2. DISPUTER, Università G. D Annunzio, Chieti, Italy 3. Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Roma, Italy

Estelle Chaussard Berkeley Seismological Laboratory

Geoscience Australia Report on Cal/Val Activities

ESA's Thematic Exploitation Platform initiative and the GEP for terrain motion measurements

Forme et Mouvements de la Terre

Copernicus Today and Tomorrow GEO Week Group on Earth Observation Geneva, 16 January 2014 The Copernicus Space Infrastructure

Results from the ASI/NASA collaboration

GEM Faulted Earth. A Global Active Fault and Fault Source Database

Surface Deformation Measurements Scientific Requirements & Challenges

EO4SEE - THE PATHFINDER OF OPERATIONAL SATELLITE MONITORING FOR THE REGION OF THE BLACK SEA AND CENTRAL EUROPE

to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San

National Satellite Data Centre and Finnish Sentinel Collaborative Ground Segment. Jyri Heilimo Finnish Meteorological Instute

Copernicus Space Component

Sentinel-1 Mission Status

Supporting GPSC Cities with Satellite Earth Observation for Sustainable Urban Development

EXTRACTION OF FLOODED AREAS DUE THE 2015 KANTO-TOHOKU HEAVY RAINFALL IN JAPAN USING PALSAR-2 IMAGES

The Santorini Inflation Episode, Monitored by InSAR and GPS

Haiti Earthquake (12-Jan-2010) co-seismic motion using ALOS PALSAR

Geodesy (InSAR, GPS, Gravity) and Big Earthquakes

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Technology 16 (2014 )

Non-meteorological Applications for Next Generation Geostationary Satellites: A 2016 CEOS Chair Initiative

KARI Activation for the International Disasters

Committee on Earth Observation Satellites. Landslide Disaster Working Group Pilot: Status Report. March 8th, 2016

U s i n g t h e E S A / E U M E T C A S T N a v i g a t o r s

The April 6 th 2009, L Aquila (Italy) earthquake: DInSAR analysis and seismic source model inversion

Journal of Geophysical Research (Solid Earth) Supporting Information for

Impact of the Envisat Mission Extension on SAR data

Towards Routine Monitoring of Tectonic and Volcanic Deformation with Sentinel-1

The Potential of High Resolution Satellite Interferometry for Monitoring Enhanced Oil Recovery

Copernicus Schaffung einer europäischen Kapazität für die operationelle Erdbeobachtung

NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Data Products

COVERAGE-Sargasso Sea

WGCapD Support to AmeriGEOSS Week Disaster Training Report

Background Document: Report of the Regional Committee of United Nations Global Geospatial Information Management for Asia and the Pacific

J. Manuel Delgado (1,2), Roberto Cuccu (1), Giancarlo Rivolta (1)

UNAVCO Annual Report. EarthScope Comprehensive SAR Archive

GEO Geohazards Community of Practice

Sentinel-1A SAR Interferometry Verification

Sentinel and ESA Third-Party Mission data access and processing tools

MONITORING THE CAMPI FLEGREI CALDERA BY EXPLOITING SAR AND GEODETICAL DATA: RECENT RESULTS AND FUTURE APPLICATIONS

Volcano Pilot Long-term Objectives

In order to obtain a long term monitoring result for the Kilauea Volcano, ALOS PALSAR images taken on Track 287, Frame 38, ascending orbit with 21.5 d

Line of Sight Displacement from ALOS-2 Interferometry: Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake and Mw 7.3 Aftershock

Ice & Snow Session. Chairs: J. Mouginot & N. Gourmelen

Geohazard Supersite Initiative to.

Impact of the Envisat Mission Extension on SAR data

sentinel-2 COLOUR VISION FOR COPERNICUS

The ESA Earth observation programmes overview and outlook

Subsidence Monitoring in Hampton Roads Using InSAR

C o p e r n i c u s a n d W I G O S

Diverse deformation patterns of Aleutian volcanoes from InSAR

Basics of the modelling of the ground deformations produced by an earthquake. EO Summer School 2014 Frascati August 13 Pierre Briole

CEOS Landslide Pi lot Working Group: An Overview

Summaries and Recommendations of the Fringe 2007 Workshop

Report of the Working Group 2 Data Sharing and Integration for Disaster Management *

Earth Observation and GEOSS in Horizon Copernicus for Raw Material Workshop 5 th September 2016

Economic and Social Council

Measuring Earthquake-Induced Deformation in the South of Halabjah (Sarpol-e-Zahab) Using Sentinel-1 Data on November 12, 2017

Large Scale Mapping Policy for the Province of Nova Scotia

The International Charter Space and Major Disasters is further strengthening its contribution to disaster management worldwide.

GEOMATICS AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT: Early Impact assessment in Haiti

Two case history of EMS data application: earthquake in central italy and flooding in Piedmont region

Credits: Fa. Ilv im Auftrag von LMBV mbh. CEOS Disaster Risk Management Observation Strategy Issue 2.1

EuroGEOSS Protected Areas Pilot

Ground deformation monitoring at the Phlegrean Fields (Naples, Italy) from the exploitation of SAR data in the framework of CAT-1 and DUP activities

Geological Mapping Using EO Data for Onshore O&G Exploration

Application of satellite InSAR data for hydrocarbon reservoir monitoring

K&C Phase 4 Status report. Ice Sheet Monitoring using ALOS-2. University of California, Irvine 2 JPL

Bengt Kjellson Chair of the Executive Committee UN-GGIM: Europe. 2 nd Joint UN-GGIM: Europe ESS Meeting 11 th March 2016, Luxembourg

Transcription:

CEOS Thematic Pilots Q1-Q2 2016 CEOS Seismic Pilot report Seismic Pilot/ Objective A, B and C March 2016- PI or PoC: Philippe Bally August 2016 (ESA) and Stefano Salvi (INGV). Collaborating organisations: CEOS partner agencies: ESA, NASA, ASI, CNES, DLR, JAXA Other partners: INGV, NOA, UNAVCO, COMET+, University of Miami, University of Pavia, ISTerre/IPGP, CNR IREA Achievements: Results stemming out from the pilot work have been published on the GEP that represents a tool for the geohazards community for accessing and sharing EO data and products including product generation though Cloud based hosted processing. The GEP has engaged 32 organizations as early adopters that are able to exploit on demand EO processing chains. In addition 4 of these organizations are CEOS Seismic Pilot partners and are able to access CEOS data collections through the GEP. INGV, NOA, ISTerre and CNR IREA are extensively working on integrating EO processors in the platform. They also contribute to refine platform requirements and performing user validation of hosted services. A new Italian organization with a mandate concerning geo-information services to support DRM has been engaged in the Pilot team: the CNR-IREA is the Center of Competence (CoC) on DInSAR for the Italian Civil Protection Department (DPC). In case of major (Mw >6) and shallow depth earthquakes occurring within the Italian territory, CNR-IREA has the mandate to rapidly provide the DPC with DInSAR Earth surface deformation maps, as soon as the first post-seismic SAR acquisition is available. Today the Pilot has two Italian mandated organisations loking at satellite EO and geohazards: the INGV and CNR IREA. Thanks to CNR IREA and INGV, the Seismic pilot established relations to an end-user for the first time: DPC is the end user of INGV and CNR IREA concerning terrain motion maps in Italy. In addition DPC may also ask for displacement measurements related to earthquakes that occur abroad, in the framework of international collaborations with foreign authorities. As an illustration of this, DPC collaborated with CNR IREA in the context of the earthquake that stroke Ecuador on 16 April 2016. 1

INTERFEROGRAM AND DISPLACEMENT MAP GENERATED BY CNR-IREA, EXPLOITING COPERNICUS SENTINEL-1 AQCUISITIONS OF 12 AND 24 APRIL 2016. For this event, the generated deformation maps are used by DPC and other DPC CoCs to understand the extension of the area affected by displacement and better focus the activities during the emergency. Moreover, these maps can also be used to model the seismogenic fault in order to increase the knowledge on the earthquake causes. For this event the SBAS-InSAR processor was used by CNR IREA to generate Sentinel-1 interferograms. COMET provided preliminary results for the Turkey validation site (Objective A), using 18 months Sentinel-1 data. The DIAPASON chain was processed to generate interferogram after the xxx Kumamoto earthquake The day of the earthquake, the CEOS Seismic Pilot was activated by the specialists of INGV, the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology of Italy to provide access to EO data to pilot contributors, and extract information from them to derive advanced science products in support of the emergency activities. INGV and CNR IREA generated a range of specialised products to support seismological analysis. Activities over Q1-Q2: Revisiting membership: Fabio Dell Acqua previously affiliated to the EU Centre is now affiliated to the University of Pavia. COMET team has worked primarily on the Turkey test site (Objective A validation site) and has a preliminary Sentinel-1 result for the whole of Turkey, along with a result from Envisat that can be used for validation. Comparison (below) between (a) line-of-sight deformation measured by Sentinel-1 over 18 months, and (b) east-west velocities from 7 years of Envisat data. Both data sets show a strong change in colour across the North Anatolian Fault, where tectonic strain is accumulating. Note the different colour scales as one is LOS motion and one is E-W. They are currently preparing a paper for this study. 2

NOA is exploiting CEOS data in order to study the Ionian Sea tectonics: 1. Radarsat-2 data are used to analyse the deformation pattern of the 2015 Lefkada earthquake. This is an on-going work that focuses on the analysis of the deformation pattern of the Island using multiple sensors. Additionally, the study focuses on the slip distribution modeling that uses various inputs (together with Radarsat-2 data from CEOS). These co-seismic results of the Lefkada earthquake are going to be presented in a peer-review journal. 2. Regarding the TSX tasking, we are going to use the acquisitions for the study of the post-seismic deformation pattern. When an adequate stack of images will be available, NOA will start the mass processing in order to define the surface velocities. The post-seismic surface velocities are then going to be modelled in terms of an afteslip. The results of this postseismic study are going to be published in a peer-reviewed scientific paper. NASA JPL has been doing extensive analysis of the Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal, both coseismic and postseismic deformation using ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 data. A paper on the coseismic deformation was just accepted in Tectonophysics last month. They are working on additional analysis of the postseismic deformation, including timeseries analysis of the ALOS-2 ScanSAR and Sentinel-1 data with atmospheric corrections with the Caltech GIAnT and PyAPS packages. Results so far indicate that the very large atmospheric effects are still larger than the expected postseismic deformation. NASA JPL is also doing coseismic analysis of the Lefkada and Ecuador earthquakes. For the 2015 Lefkada Earthquake, JPL processed the Sentinel-1A 12-day pairs on ascending track 175 (2015/11/05 and 11/17) and descending track 80 (2015/11/11 and 11/23) using prototype processing modules with the JPL InSAR 3

Scientific Computing Environment (ISCE) as part of the Caltech-JPL Advanced Rapid Imaging and Analysis (ARIA) project. They used the SRTM version 3 DEM in the coregistration step. The unwrapped phase was converted to range change and is contoured with 5 cm contours in the maps. The USGS National Earthquake Information Center epicenter for the Lefkada Earthquake and uncertainty is plotted with a red star and error ellipse. The two interferograms have been converted to a prototype interferogram archive product in HDF5 format and uploaded to the UNAVCO SSARA Interferogram archive (https://winsar.unavco.org/portal/insar/) for use by the geophysics community. The Italian earthquake: INGV and CNR-IREA have used Sentinel-1, ALOS-2 and Cosmo-SkyMed data to generate the first products to cover the Accumoli (Italy) earthquake that stroke on August 24 (Obj. C). An order for Pleiades data are ongoing. 4

INTERFEROGRAM GENERATED BY CNR-IREA, EXPLOITING ALOS-2 ACQUISITIONS OF 27TH JANUARY 2016 AND 24TH AUGUST 2016. PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE SOURCE GENERATED BY INGV EXPLOITING THE TERRAIN MOTION MEASUREMENTS FROM ALOS-2 AND COPERNICUS SENTINEL-1 AQCUISISTIONS FROM BEFORE AND AFTER THE 24 TH AUGUST EARTHQUAKE. THESE DATA WERE MODELED TO CALCULATE THE LOCATION, GEOMETRY AND AMOUNT OF SLIP ON THE SOURCE FAULT. THE SLIP IS DISTRIBUTED MAINLY IN TWO PATCHES WITH MAXIMUM VALUES OF ABOUT 1.3M. INTERFEROGRAM BASED ON THE GEP-HOSTED PROCESSING CHAIN DIAPASON OF CNES AND PROCESSED BY INGV USING SENTINEL-1 AQCUISITIONS OF 14 TH AND 26 TH AUGUST 2016 COVERING THE LEFT PART OF THE IMAGE. INTERFEROGRAM GENERATED BY INGV, EXPLOITING HIGH RESOLUTION COSMO- SKYMED ACQUISITIONS. Objective A data request over NAFS: A TerraSAR-X request for the NAFS was approved under Objective A, in order to demonstrate that TerraSAR-X can observe inter-seismic strain accumulation (under evaluation). After the agreement between CNES and Airbus to open access to non-french users, four Pleiades requests are being prepared (Nepal, Ecuador, China and Iran) and will be forwarded to CNES in September. Data access for the pilot: After ESA s arrangement with ASI, DLR and JAXA to support data dissemination using the Geohazards Exploitation Platform (GEP), ESA requested CSA to confirm if Radarsat-2 data collection (Lefkada) can be hosted on GEP too, to ease the common access to all interested pilot partners. Following the earthquake in Italy, ESA made also an arrangement with CNES to host the Pleiades metadata (footprints) on the GEP, with access restricted to CEOS Seismic pilot users. 5

Data access for the GSNL, other pilots and the community: 1. The Volcano pilot is using the platform for data dissemination (11TB for ALOS-2 data). 2. COSMO-SkyMed collections for Nepal through the GSNL (Obj. B) are available on the GEP (only for users that have signed the ASI license form). 3. Copernicus Sentinel-1 data were made available (in raw as well as SLC format) starting with CEOS Pilot targets and with the goal to gradually provide global coverage. 4. Copernicus Sentinel-2 data are available on the platform. 5. First Copernicus Sentinel-3 data were made available. Data processing (on the platform): 1. Seismic pilot users (NOA, INGV, ISTerre, CNR-IREA) access and exploit EO data to generate measurements. Users are able to process using applications on the platform or after integrating (themselves) their own processing. 2. Publications on the platform: Sentinel-1 interferograms over Ecuador and Italy (Obj. C) were generated by CNR IREA using SBAS-InSAR. The processings were run on ESA s Grid Processing On-Demand (G-POD) where the algorithm is currently integrated. The integration of the SBAS-InSAR service on the GEP is still on-going. Sentinel-1 interferograms over Italy (Obj. C) were generated by INGV using DIAPASON. Support to GSNL (Obj. B): The pilot continued to support the Gorkha earthquake Event Supersite. The new GEO Programme Board has reviewed the GSNL Implementation Plan for 2017-2019, requesting only minor integrations. The plan will be approved in August, and represent a big challenge for GSNL. There have been no requests for new Event Supersites. For Permanent Supersites, after SAC approved the new Greek Supersite, most space agencies committed resources to support it. Some agencies kindly accepted to start acquisition even before formal approval by the CEOS Plenary, to start building a good archive. The Greek Supersite coordinator is already preparing a dedicated web site. The 2014 San Andreas Fault Supersite proposal has eventually been re written according to the new template and re-submitted to the SAC. SAC approval should occur by end of August, then it will be submitted to the CEOS DCT for approval, hopefully to be formalised at the Plenary in November. The GSNL Chair has requested the CEOS DCT to verify if it is possible to modify the Supersite acceptance procedure, since now it is necessary to wait for the CEOS plenaries to formally accept the Supersite, and this may delay the Supersite activation by several months. A number of publications stemmed out of pilot work (listed in the related section, below). Pilot users are promoting their results through: the CEOS website (http://ceos.org/ ), the GSNL portal (http://www.earthobservations.org/gsnl.php ) and the Geohazards Exploitation Platform (https://geohazards-tep.eo.esa.int/ ). The platform hosts results from the broad geohazards community using satellite EO, not only results from CEOS Pilot users and not necessarily processed on the GEP. Data accessed over this Total data accessed to date (#images /satellite) 6

period 10 ALOS-2 images (a total of 37 images will be downloaded under Obj. C for year 2015, over Nepal) 7 ALOS-2 over the Andes (interseismic) 24 ALOS-2 over NAFS (interseismic) 2 ALOS-2 images over Italy 14 TerraSAR-X images (Greece, Obj. C) currently acquired (some of them already accessed) 30 COSMO-SkyMed images over Greece (Obj. C), Iran and China (Obj. A) A number of Sentinel- 1 images A large number of COSMO-SKyMed, as well as S1 and Pleiades data are ordered for the Italian earthquake on August 24. Products: 1. Range change maps over Lefkada/Greece and Ecuador 2. LOS displacement maps, Lefkada/Greece and Ecuador 3. LOS and E-W velocity maps over (NAFS) 4. Ground displacement maps, Accumoli/Italy 5. Deformation maps Turkey over 26 ALOS-2 images (out of a total of images that will be downloaded under Obj. C for year 2015, over Nepal, as JAXA will not provide data through the GSNL) 2 ALOS-2 over Italy 7 ALOS-2 over the Andes (interseismic) 24 ALOS-2 over NAFS (interseismic) 14 TerraSAR-X images (Greece, Obj. C) currently acquired (in total 65 will be acquired) 4 Radarsat-2 images (Greece, Obj. C) 99 COSMO-SkyMed images over Greece, Italy (Obj. C), Iran and China (Obj. A) A number of Sentinel-1 images User (by product): NASA JPL CNR IREA COMET CNR IREA CNR IREA INGV INGV, CNR IREA Link for the Accumoli earthquake products: https://discuss.terradue.com/t/2 016-central-italy-earthquakeesa-announcing-the-firstsentinel-1-based-measurementsafter-the-earthquake/70 User or practitioner endorsement/opinion/o utcomes DPC (end-user) used deformation maps (Ecuador: range change and LOS displacement maps) generated by CNR- IREA to understand the extension of the area affected by displacement and better focus the activities during the emergency. DPC asked IREA a detailed report on the surface deformations due to the mainshock, which was also forwarded to the Ecuadorian 7

Accumoli/Italy 6. Fault slip maps over Accumoli/Italy 7. Interferograms over Accumoli/Italy authorities of civil protection. List any publications directly stemming from pilot work: Yue H. et al. (2016), Depth varying rupture properties during the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake, Tectonophysics, In Press Papadopoulos et al. (2016), The Mw6,5 earthquake of 17 November 2015 in Lefkada Island and the seismotectonics in the Cephalonia Transform Fault (Ionian Sea, Greece), Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 18, EGU2016-9041-1, 2016 (accepted, NOA, Obj. C) List objective milestones and state progress to date (%): Objective A: - Partial results of validation Turkey, California, Japan, other selected areas Objective B: - The GEP has been successfully used to support the Nepal Event site (first COSMO-SkyMed data available). Objective C: - Earthquakes identified in 2016: Ecuador, Nepal (on-going), Greece (on-going) and Italy (on-going). - Comparison of results obtained by different groups/algorithms/approaches (has not started, is a complex activity which requires collaboration and funding) - Examine the gaps of existing acquisition plans over the major cities of the world in areas of high seismic risk (90% completion). All megacities in areas at high seismic risk are at least partially covered by SAR sensor. The study identified sites with good coverage using nearly global coverage missions as Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2, but for many sites there is not full coverage with ascending and descending acquisitions from Radarsat-2, TerraSAR X, and COSMO-SkyMed. - Demonstration of the generation of different products for 1-2 earthquakes (90%). - Product assessment by the final users (50%): DPC is the first end user that uses Seismic pilot data. The products were generated by CNR IREA, who has the mandate to rapidly provide the DPC with DInSAR Earth surface deformation maps, as soon as the first postseismic SAR acquisition is available. For the Ecuador earthquake, on April 17, 2016, the Ecuador government asked assistance to the Directorate-General Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection of the European Commission. On this basis, and under the coordination of the United Nations, Italy declared the emergency state for the Ecuador earthquake, which allowed Italian logistic support and technical experts to be provided for the evaluation of strategic buildings on site. Within this frame, DPC asked IREA a detailed report on the surface deformations due to the mainshock, which was also forwarded to the Ecuadorian authorities of civil protection. In this case, as in other cases, the generated deformation maps were used by DPC and other DPC CoCs to understand the extension of the area affected by displacement and better focus the activities during the emergency. Moreover, these maps can also be used to model the seismogenic fault in order to increase the 8

knowledge on the earthquake causes. Issues identified and risk management approach - Most pilot users are EO practitioners from the category of science users (rather than endusers). The way to reach an end-user is through a science user. -In case of earthquake response it is difficult to identify end-users in advance as earthquake location and time are not predictable. -Accounting of data accessed can be difficult in absence of user feedback. -It takes time to organize data supply to users. We set up a dedicated group to follow this process. - It requires changes of behavior and is time consuming to move from standalone processing to an ecosystem of hosted services. However once done many low level tasks (data selection, data fetching, selection of set up of processing chains) aren t a burden to users any longer. 9