The Council of Europe Spatial/ Regional Planning (CEMAT) considering Landscape with its Heritage Values

Similar documents
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

CEMAT results - over the years

COUNCIL OF EUROPE S SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Geospatial Technology and Innovation

Developing Quality of Life and Urban- Rural Interactions in BSR

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

The view of Europaforum Northern Sweden concerning the future of EU cohesion policy

The National Spatial Strategy

PART A Project summary

Improvements for Kosovo's spatial planning system / [presentation given in May 2011]

Community Engagement in Cultural Routes SiTI Higher Institute on Territorial Systems for Innovation Sara Levi Sacerdotti

The European territory: Strategic developmentd

Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion

Third Annual Climate Science and Policy Conference, UC Santa Cruz: Earth s Climate Future: Unchartered Territory

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

ACTION PLAN FOR WORLD HERITAGE IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ( )

Land Use in the context of sustainable, smart and inclusive growth

Implementation of the ESPON 2020 cooperation program. 16 January 2017 Anneloes van Noordt

Statutory framework of the world network of biosphere reserves UNESCO General Conference 1996

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

THE ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INTERREG III B BALTCOAST PROJECT

INTRODUCING THE EUROPEAN DIMENSION

Heritage Counts! Economic Impacts of Cultural Heritage European Perspective - Presented by: Dr. Cornelia Dümcke, CULTURE CONCEPTS, Berlin, Germany

ACCESSIBILITY TO SERVICES IN REGIONS AND CITIES: MEASURES AND POLICIES NOTE FOR THE WPTI WORKSHOP, 18 JUNE 2013

PROTOCOL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALPINE CONVENTION OF 1991 RELATING TO SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Integrated Strategies in regional development

PURR: POTENTIAL OF RURAL REGIONS UK ESPON WORKSHOP Newcastle 23 rd November Neil Adams

EuroGeoSurveys & ASGMI The Geological Surveys of Europe and IberoAmerica

ESPON support for Targeted Analyses Ilona Raugze Director

Policy framework The Netherlands and the Polar Regions, Summary and priorities

OPINION. Results of EU Structural Policy in NSPA

CAMP SLOVENIA. Mezek Slavko RRC Koper. Project coordinator November 2005

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

National planning report for Denmark

Declaration Population and culture

PROGRAM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ARCTIC COUNCIL IN

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

Multinational Spatial Planning Experience

International Guidelines on Access to Basic Services for All

Urban Climate Resilience

The UN discusses Global Geospatial Information Management

European spatial policy and regionalised approaches

Third Cohesion report February 2004

TERRITORIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: AN APPROACH TO IMPROVE THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL INTEGRATION OF EU POLICIES

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

Arctic ecosystem services: TEEB Arctic Scoping study. Alexander Shestakov WWF Global Arctic Programme 3 December Arctic Biodiversity Congress

ESSENTIAL CONCEPTS AND SKILL SETS OF THE IOWA CORE CURRICULUM

COSTA RICA Limon City-Port Project

6 th GLOBAL SUMMIT ON URBAN TOURISM 4 6 December 2017, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

Workshop B Spatial positioning and definition of characteristics

UNCTAD Single-year Expert Meeting on Tourism s Contribution to Sustainable Development

What is Spatial Planning?

Non-Governmental Organizations for Spatial Data Infrastructure. Environmental Democracy Case

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

The European Union and its Overseas Entities

New Prospects for Peripheral Rural Regions Helmut Hiess Glasgow, 19th of May 2010

National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) Policy Coordination and Advisory Service

TP4D. Fostering territorial perspective for development. Towards a wider alliance

M. Mikoš. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Alps Results from the ESPON Project. Common spatial perspectives for the Alpine area. Towards a common vision

Dutch spatial planning: from implicit to explicit sustainable urban development

Statement. H.E Dr. Richard Nduhuura Permanent Representative of the Republic of Uganda to the United Nations New York

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

Shetland Islands Council

Jordan's Strategic Research Agenda in cultural heritage

ACTION PLAN FOR WORLD HERITAGE IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

Summary. Recommendations on the Fifth Policy Document on Spatial Planning September 2001

GSDI Global Spatial Data Infrastructure. Convergences between Geo Spatial Communities: key decision for decision making

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARPATHIAN INTEGRATED BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION SYSTEM

The Joint Programming Initiative on Cultural Heritage (JPICH): European perspective

Concept note. High-Level Seminar: Accelerating Sustainable Energy for All in Landlocked Developing Countries through Innovative Partnerships

Taking into account people with special needs

Experience and perspectives of using EU funds and other funding for the implementation of district renovation projects

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

Low Density Areas : Places of Opportunity. Enrique Garcilazo, OECD Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development

Correlation of Neighborhood Map Machine to Grade 1 Ontario Social Studies Curriculum

Urbanization and Sustainable Development of Cities: A Ready Engine to Promote Economic Growth and Cooperation

European Landscape Convention in the Slovak Republic

INSPIRing effort. Peter Parslow Ordnance Survey December Various European approaches to managing an SDI

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

The World Bank Local and Regional Competitiveness Project (P154263)

Local Development Pilot Project: Island of Cres. Ranka Saračević Würth, Ministry of Culture, Republic of Croatia

Statutory Framework of Biosphere Reserves. The Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves

The National Policy Strategy for Infrastructure and Spatial Planning CODE24 CONFERENCE. Emiel Reiding

COSTA RICA Limon City-Port Project

Spatial planning policies and conceptions on the European level influences on national spatial planning systems

Al Ain Cultural Heritage Management Strategy 1/102

RURAL-URBAN PARTNERSHIPS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Economic and Social Council

High speed network in Hauts-de-France Region. Värnamo, 17 th May 2018

Measurement of the Urban-Housing Deficit:

Baltic Sea Region cooperation in Maritime Spatial Planning - HELCOM/VASAB

Towards a National Ecosystem Services Strategy for Australia

Economic and Social Council

United Nations Group Of Experts On Geographical Names

Cultural Diversity and Urban Areas

Transcription:

The Council of Europe Spatial/ Regional Planning (CEMAT) considering Landscape with its Heritage Values Report to The Council of Europe Directorate of Culture and Cultural and Natural Heritage 30 April 2012 CEMAT Working for the Human Environment By Audun MOFLAG, Consultant A. J. Horgens vei 20, NO-3055 Krokstadelva, Norway Tel.: +47 971 96 724 (mobile). E-mail: amoflag@ebnett.no

Acknowledgements Ruzan ALAVERDYAN, Armenia Anita BERGENSTRÅHLE-LIND, Sweden Tapio HEIKKILÄ, Finland Margarita JANČIČ, Slovenia Jenny KAMP, United Kingdom (Wales) Pavlina MISIKOVA, Slovakia Jerker MOSTRÖM, Sweden Danica PAVLOVSKA, Republic of Macedonia Bas PEDROLI, Netherlands Jussi RAUTSI, Finland Michael ROTH, Austria Elena SADOVNIKOVA, Russia Jean-Claude SINNER, Luxembourg Andreas STALDER, Switzerland Erik SVEISTRUP, Norway Susan WILLIAMSON, United Kingdom Photo: CEMAT

What the report is about I. The link between the CEMAT activities and the priorities of the Council of Europe II. The perspectives of a reinforcement of the activities between spatial planning, landscape and heritage III. The added value of the Council of Europe activities considering the work done in the European Union

I. The link between the CEMAT activities and the CoE priorities Photo: Bjørn Casper Horgen

The spatial development and planning affect our lives may be far more than we are aware of A nation s territory is a unique, non-renewable strategic resource The spatial development has a profound bearing on our quality of life Also on the emergence of streets, public places and points of contact

A sensible spatial development requires political attention and intervention Spatial development should not be left to the market mechanisms alone. Usually, the objective of property developers is to make profits in market circumstances. They do not supply common goods for the citizens. Example Housing

100 years ago

Ample outdoor space and common goods No cars

50 years ago

Where do I live? Photo: Mette Randem

Today Market development - interior extravagancy, buyer pays for personal benefits - exterior minimalism, no one pays for common goods

No outdoor space Private terraces

Tjuvholmen High cost development at the urban sea front

The CEMAT activities relate to Democratic Governance and Sustainable Democratic Societies CoE Action Plan II-7 (Summit 2005): Integrated policies in the fields of environment, landscape and spatial planning Photo: Marjut Kokko CoE priorities for 2012-2013: Democratic Governance and Sustainable Democratic Societies In a decentralised democracy: Local challenges are most effectively met by local initiatives

CEMAT is promoting multi-level governance in keeping with the principles of subsidiarity and reciprocity Principle of subsidiarity Central government sector policies Horizontal co-operation Municipal policies Step 1: The regional government is the adequate level for horizontal co-operation between sector-related policies, creating synergies and added value Principle of reciprocity Central government sector policies Viable, integrated policies Municipal policies Vertical co-operation Vertical co-operation Step 2: By vertical co-operation, national and local authorities take the overall regional policies into account in their respective plans and decisions.

Regional level: Common meeting ground and Point of exchange between central and local perspectives subsidiarity Ministries Central level reciprocity Horizontal and vertical coordination between sectorrelated policies and decisionmaking bodies at different levels subsidiarity Viable, integrated policies reciprocity Local and regional government and planning, creating added value to central government policies Municipalities Local level Public participation and involvement of the civil society

II. Reinforcement of the activities between spatial planning, landscape and heritage

The landscape, with its natural and cultural heritage, expresses the human qualities of our environment We perceive the landscape by all our senses. This is: Giving rise to emotional associations and personal identity Presenting physical opportunities and obstacles Significant for the attractiveness of our communities but works two ways (up or down) Photo: Svein Magne Fredriksen

The human aspects of our environment invigorate the spatial planning The ELC applies to the entire national territory provides a systematic approach to identifying and assessing the landscape, adding a human quality to its territory generates political attention and innovation allows professionals and citizens to have equal saying regardless of academic, ethnical, social or cultural background

Spatial planning is the arena and the instrument for achieving cross sector co-operation and synergies Before, development was often put up against protection Development or Development and Protection Protection Viable, integrated policies Landscape and heritage are also potential assets in the economic and social development The economic and social ambitions must be merged with cultural and ecological functions and capacity Spatial planning is the arena and the instrument for achieving cooperation and synergies Active citizens and participation bring new life and new approaches to the political debate

III. Added value of the Council of Europe activities considering the work in the European Union

The CoE represents 800 million citizens across the entire European space 27 EU member states 20 Non EU member states Reflecting a great cultural and physical diversity Territory of the CoE member states 18% EU member states Part of the common European heritage, as well as its future Non-EU member states 82%

The agenda of the CoE is giving room for imagination and creativity The treaties of the EU cover issues on which every member state is obliged to act CoE is freer in thought and speech, inviting debate and visionary thinking The conventions of the CoE enable a development process in each country Spatial planning belongs to the national competences

The CoE is offering important fields of activities in landscape and spatial planning The CoE provides fora for the member states to work together CEMAT is a unique, high level forum for policy design and officially acknowledged standards and principles in this field The CoE is also offering important and wide fields of work at sub national level in cooperation with PACE and CLRAE

Some tentative options How do you want to use these opportunities? You are the experts and beneficiaries CoE is the facilitator and link to other parts of the organisation Photo: Bjørn Casper Horgen

I. The link between the CEMAT activities and the priorities of the Council of Europe a. Recognition and increased stimulus by the CoE b. Focus on the CoE priorities 2012-2013 and participatory planning approaches c. Innovative ways of working, drawing on the expertise of the CSO-CEMAT s own representatives d. Exchange of knowledge and best practice at regular meetings and seminars e. Practical and financial aspects of regional twinning arrangements and mutual study visits

II. Reinforcement of the activities between spatial planning, landscape and heritage a. A unique view to be communicated b. Prevailing perceptions and associations of the term landscape c. The CoE committees d. Joint projects e. Co-operation and training

III. Added value of the Council of Europe activities considering the work done in the European Union a. Comparative information on the European institutions what they do and their priorities b. Promotion of the specific role of the CEMAT c. Joint co-operation CoE-EU in some domains d. More ideas from the CoE, more financing from the EU not instead of each other, but together e. Co-operation with macro regions and other organisations

Thank you for your kind attention!