Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

Similar documents
Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

Estimating long-term noise levels from short-term noise measurements and a long term reference location

Trip and Parking Generation Study of Orem Fitness Center-Abstract

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report

8-1 Multiplying and Dividing Rational Expressions. Simplify each expression. ANSWER: 3. MULTIPLE CHOICE Identify all values of x for which

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Evaluating success of diamond grinding to attain project noise reduction goal via system-wide OBSI study

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) APPENDIX J Wind and Temperature Gradients

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. May 31, 2016

8-1 Multiplying and Dividing Rational Expressions. Simplify each expression. ANSWER: ANSWER:

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance

1 y = Recitation Worksheet 1A. 1. Simplify the following: b. ( ) a. ( x ) Solve for y : 3. Plot these points in the xy plane:

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

APPENDIX B. Noise Primer

8-1 Multiplying and Dividing Rational Expressions. Simplify each expression. SOLUTION: The function is undefined when the denominator tends to 0.

FUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

A SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE RCL AUTOMATED HORN SYSTEM A Report from the Texas Transportation Institute

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015

DEA 3500: HUMAN FACTORS: THE AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT (Fall 2017)

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

March Grade Crossing Analysis

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

Basic Noise Calculations April 2007

Insertion Loss Analysis of the Acoustic Panels with Composite Construction

Public Open House Meeting Thursday, February 22, Broken Arrow to Tulsa Mass Transit Feasibility Study

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study

APPENDIX 11A: BASELINE NOISE MONITORING RESULTS

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

Compliance Noise Survey & Assessment

Encapsulating Urban Traffic Rhythms into Road Networks

2015 Grand Forks East Grand Forks TDM

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

15.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Calculations

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

SHORT NIGHTTIME WATER SHUTDOWN TO OCCUR IN EARLY HOURS OF MAY 29

Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Justice Analysis FOR THE MINNESOTA STATEWIDE FREIGHT SYSTEM PLAN

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY

Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz. Holt Algebra 2 2

DEA 350: HUMAN FACTORS: THE AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT (Spring 2008)

Chapter 7: Practice/review problems The collection of problems listed below contains questions taken from previous MA123 exams.

Monroe County: Key West and Lower Keys

Traffic Impact Study

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Appendix C Traffic Study

Technology Math Skills Assessment. Practice Test 1

Sensitivity of estimates of travel distance and travel time to street network data quality

Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation

Uncertainties in Acoustics

METRO Blue Line LRT Extension (BLRT) 5514 West Broadway Avenue, Suite 200, Crystal, MN

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY

The prediction of passenger flow under transport disturbance using accumulated passenger data

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

Regional Performance Measures

EXAMINATION OF THE SAFETY IMPACTS OF VARYING FOG DENSITIES: A CASE STUDY OF I-77 IN VIRGINIA

Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015

Presented at the FIG Working Week 2017, May 29 - June 2, 2017 in Helsinki, Finland

Town of Oconomowoc Snow & Ice Control Policy

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX

Heathrow Community Noise and Track-keeping Report: Chertsey

Appendix N Noise Study

Appendix I: Traffic Study

ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL IV

Status Report: Ongoing review of O-D cellular data for the TPB modeled area

2014 Certification Review Regional Data & Modeling

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008

Velocity Thresholds in Car-Following at Night

Mitigation of Gypsum Mine Voids Under SR-2 in Ottawa County, Ohio

Transcription:

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX E General Noise Assessment The FTA General Noise Assessment procedure was used for calculating noise from transit sources associated with the proposed project. The noise impact is assessed based on a combination of existing ambient noise exposure and the additional noise exposure that will be caused by the proposed project. Existing Noise Exposure Levels: The Light Rail Rapid Transit (LRRT) system located on Main Street is the major source of existing noise in the vicinity of the proposed project. The FTA manual categorizes LRRT as a Fixed-Guideway Transit Source. The LRRT travels an average speed, S of 15 miles per hour across the project corridor. The average number of cars per train, N cars is assumed to be three for this analysis (based on two cars during off-peak periods, three cars during peak periods, and four cars during special events and downtown sporting events). The LRRT system operates from approximately 5:30am to 1:00 am every day of the year. The LRRT operating schedule, obtained from NFTA website is presented in Table E-1. Table E-1. LRRT Operating Schedule* Period Headway (minutes) Trains per hour Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Total Daytime 7am - 9am 8 7 8 8 16 9am - 2pm 9 8 7 7 14 2pm - 7pm 8 8 8 7 15 7pm - 10pm 6 7 10 9 19 Nighttime 10pm - 1am 6 7 10 9 19 1am - 6am -- -- -- -- -- 6am - 7am 8 7 8 8 16 *The schedule above is for weekdays. Assume the weekday schedule for all seven days of the week. From Table E-1: The average hourly volume of train traffic, V within the study area (i.e., from the Theater Station to Erie Canal Harbor) = 99 trains/24 hours = 4.1 trains/hour; The average hourly volume of traffic during daytime (7 am to 10 pm), V d = 64 trains/15 hours = 4.3 trains/hour; and The average hourly volume of traffic during nighttime (10 pm to 7 am) V n = 35 trains/9 hours = 3.9 trains/hour The rail track is jointed within the proposed project area and has an embedded track configuration (128 lb girder rail buried in concrete). There is no aerial structure with slab track. There is also no noise barrier blocking the line of sight from each noise sensitive receptor. E-1

For the Category 2 receptors (Radisson Hotel and Youth Hostel), noise exposure in terms of L dn at 50 ft (each of the three noise receptors are approximately 50 feet to the centerline of the LRRT s trackbed) were calculated as follows: L eq (day) = SEL ref + 10 log (N cars ) + 20log(S/50 feet) + 10 log (V d ) 35.6 = 47 dba Where SEL ref, the reference sound exposure level for Rail Transit at 50 ft from track = 82 dba (FTA, 2006). The following adjustments were made in accordance with the FTA manual: - Additional 5dBA for jointed track and additional 3 dba for embedded track on grade. Therefore, total Leq (day) = 47 dba + 8 dba = 55 dba Leq (night) = SEL ref + 10 log (N cars ) + 20log(S/50 feet) + 10 log (V n ) 35.6 = 46.6 dba After adjusting for the jointed track and embedded track configuration, Total Leq (night) = 54.6 dba Ldn at 50 ft = 10 log [(15) x 10 (Leq (day)/10) + (9) x 10 ((Leq (night) + 10)/10) ] 13.8 = 61.1 dba For the Category 3 receptor (St. Paul s Episcopal Cathedral Church), noise exposure in terms of hourly L eq (h) at 50 ft was calculated as follows: L eq (hour) = SEL ref + 10 log (N cars ) + 20log(S/50 feet) + 10 log (V) 35.6 = 46.8 dba After adjusting for the jointed track and embedded track configuration, Total Leq (hour) = 54.8 dba Proposed Project Noise Exposure Levels: The proposed reintroduction of automobiles (cars and delivery trucks) to Main Street corridor would be an additional exposure to noise within the project s vicinity. The FTA manual categorizes these automobiles as Highway/Transit Sources. The automobile vehicles would be restricted to an average speed, S of 15 miles per hour. The future (2025) Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume for the Preferred Alternative is approximately 5,000 ADT (see section 7.0 Transportation). This would result in an hourly traffic volume, V of 209 vehicles per hour, with projected average hourly daytime, E-2

V d (7 am to 10 pm) and nighttime, V n (10 pm to 7 am) traffic volumes of 317 and 28 vehicles per hour, respectively. The project noise exposure levels for the Preferred Alternative are calculated below: For the Category 2 receptors (Radisson Hotel and Youth Hostel), noise exposure in terms of L dn at 50 ft was calculated as follows: L eq (day) = SEL ref + 10 log (V d ) + Cs log(s/50 feet) 35.6 = 47.7 dba Where SEL ref, the reference sound exposure level for automobiles and vans at 50 ft from roadway = 74 dba (FTA, 2006); and Cs, the Speed Constant for automobile and van pools = 30 L eq (night) = SEL ref + 10 log (V n ) + Cs log(s/50 feet) 35.6 = 37.2 dba Ldn at 50 ft = 10 log [(15) x 10 (Leq (day)/10) + (9) x 10 ((Leq (night) + 10)/10) ] 13.8 = 47.5 dba For the Category 3 receptor (St. Paul s Episcopal Cathedral Church), noise exposure in terms of hourly L eq (h) at 50 ft was calculated as follows: L eq (hour) = SEL ref + 10 log (V) + Cs log(s/50 feet) 35.6 = 45.9 dba Noise impact is assessed based on a combination of the existing ambient noise exposure (LRRT) and the additional noise exposure (automobile traffic) that will be caused by the proposed project. Figure E-1 provides a handy graph that can be used to add sound levels in decibels. For example, if two sound levels of 64 db and 60 db are to be added, the difference in decibels between the two levels to be added is 4 db. The curve intersects the 4 where the increment to be added to the higher level is 1.5. Therefore the sum of the two levels is 65 db. E-3

Figure E-1. Graph for Approximate Decibel Addition A summary of noise effects of the Preferred Alternative is presented in Table E-2. Table E-2. Noise Effects of the Preferred Alternative Preferred Alternative Criteria Share the Trackbed Church Radisson Hostel Receptor Leq(hour) Leq(day) Leq(night) Ldn Leq(day) Leq(night) Ldn Traffic Noise 46 48 37 48 48 37 48 LRRT Noise 55 55 55 61 55 55 61 Combined Noise 56 61 61 E-4