Particle Physics Homework Assignment 4

Similar documents
Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 23, Physics 663, lecture 4 1

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Hadronic Showers. KIP Journal Club: Calorimetry and Jets 2009/10/28 A.Kaplan & A.Tadday

EP228 Particle Physics

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

Electromagnetic and hadronic showers development. G. Gaudio, M. Livan The Art of Calorimetry Lecture II

Theory English (Official)

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

Interactions of particles and radiation with matter

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

Selected Topics in Physics a lecture course for 1st year students by W.B. von Schlippe Spring Semester 2007

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 24. Exam 2 Particle Detectors

Physics Quarknet/Service Learning

Particle-Matter Interactions

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

The LHC Experiments. TASI Lecture 2 John Conway

Photons: Interactions

Problem Set # 2 SOLUTIONS

2. Determine the excess charge on the outer surface of the outer sphere (a distance c from the center of the system).

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 25. Particle Detectors

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

Detectors for High Energy Physics

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

3 Charged Particle Motion in a Magnetic Field

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 3

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

Calorimetry in. in Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments

ATLAS Hadronic Calorimeters 101

Interaction of Particles and Matter

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 4

Lecture 14 (11/1/06) Charged-Particle Interactions: Stopping Power, Collisions and Ionization

Chapter 2 Radiation-Matter Interactions

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

Part A-type questions

Particle Interactions in Detectors

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

The interaction of radiation with matter

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Interaction of Electron and Photons with Matter

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Passage of particles through matter

Slide 1 / 57. Nuclear Physics & Nuclear Reactions Practice Problems

Lecture 15 Notes: 07 / 26. The photoelectric effect and the particle nature of light

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

PSI AP Physics How was it determined that cathode rays possessed a negative charge?

Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

Physics 111 Homework Solutions Week #9 - Friday

Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Quantum Physics and Atomic Models Chapter Questions. 1. How was it determined that cathode rays possessed a negative charge?

Particle Identification: Computer reconstruction of a UA1 event with an identified electron as a candidate for a W >eν event

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

Rb, which had been compressed to a density of 1013

Lecture 11. Weak interactions

Today, I will present the first of two lectures on neutron interactions.

We start with a reminder of a few basic concepts in probability. Let x be a discrete random variable with some probability function p(x).

Calorimetry I Electromagnetic Calorimeters

Experimental Particle Physics Informal Lecture & Seminar Series Lecture 1 Detectors Overview

DUAL NATURE OF RADIATION AND MATTER

Heavy charged particle passage through matter

Queen s University PHYS 352

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

The ATLAS Experiment and the CERN Large Hadron Collider

Detector Basics I. Mark Messier Indiana University. Neutrino Summer School 2009 July 6, 2009 Fermilab, IL

Interaction of Particles with Matter

Neutrinos, nonzero rest mass particles, and production of high energy photons Particle interactions

Particle Detectors : an introduction. Erik Adli/Are Strandlie, University of Oslo, August 2017, v2.3

Concepts of Event Reconstruction

Particle Acceleration

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (48 hours)

Multiple Choice Questions

C In other study groups large spark-chamber magnets have been 1 2 These magnets are to be used as triggered ''bubble chambers"

Physics 111 Homework Solutions Week #9 - Thursday

Nuclear and Particle Physics 4b Physics of the Quark Gluon Plasma

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

Lecture 6-4 momentum transfer and the kinematics of two body scattering

LET! (de / dx) 1 Gy= 1 J/kG 1Gy=100 rad. m(kg) dose rate

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (40 hours)

Chapter Four (Interaction of Radiation with Matter)

Status of the physics validation studies using Geant4 in ATLAS

UGC ACADEMY LEADING INSTITUE FOR CSIR-JRF/NET, GATE & JAM PHYSICAL SCIENCE TEST SERIES # 4. Atomic, Solid State & Nuclear + Particle

Lecture 3 - Compton Scattering

Explain how Planck resolved the ultraviolet catastrophe in blackbody radiation. Calculate energy of quanta using Planck s equation.

Tracker material study with the energy flow through the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter. Riccardo Paramatti, Ambra Provenza

Physics of particles. H. Paganetti PhD Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School

Explain how line spectra are produced. In your answer you should describe:

1. (a) An ion of plutonium Pu has an overall charge of C. (iii) electrons... (3) (2) (Total 5 marks)

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 23. HW Particle Detectors

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

Threshold photoproduction of J/y with the GlueX experiment. Lubomir Pentchev Jefferson Lab for the GlueX collaboration

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

day1- determining particle properties Peter Wittich Cornell University

Experimental Particle Physics

THEORETICAL COMPETITION. 1A. SPRING CYLINDER WITH MASSIVE PISTON (5 points)

Transcription:

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 4 Prof. Costas Foudas March 01 Problem 1: Show the the momentum, p of a particle moving in a circular trajectory of radius, R, in a magnetic field, B, is given by: p = 0.3 BR where the momentum is given in GeV/c the magnetic field is in Tesla and the radius in meters. Solution: q v B = m v R R = p qb where the momentum is given in Kg m/sec and the charge in Cb. 1eV = 1.610 19 Cb 1Volt = 1.6 10 19 Joules 1 GeV = 1.6 10 10 Joules 1GeV / c = 1.6 10 10 kg m/ sec = 1.610 18 kg m/ sec 310 8 3 Hence, R = 1.6 10 18 p[gev /c] kg m 3 sec 1.6 10 19 Cb B[Tesla] R = p [GeV / c] 0.3 B [Tesla] Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 1 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Problem :.A particle of mass M and 4-momentum P decays into two particles of masses m 1 and m. (1) Show that the energy of the 1 st particle in the frame of M is: E 1 = M m 1 m M () Show that the kinetic energy T i of the i th particle in the frame of M is: T i where M = M m 1 = M 1 m i M M M m is the mass excess or Q value of the process. (3) A lambda particle,, is a neutral baryon of mass M = 1115 MeV that decays into a proton of mass m 1 = 938 MeV and pion of mass m = 140 MeV. Compute the kinetic energies of the proton and the pion in the lambda rest frame. Solution: The kinetic energy is given by: T i = E * i m i. Therefore if we can compute the energy of each particle we almost finished. But this we have done in class. At the M reference frame we have: P = M ;0, p 1 = E 1 * ; p *, p = E * ; p * and P = p 1 p P p 1 = p M m 1 P p 1 = m also E * 1 = M m 1 m M E * = M m m 1 M Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

T 1 = E * 1 m 1 = M m 1 m M m = M m1 m 1 M T 1 = M m 1 m M m 1 M M = M M M m 1 m T 1 = M M M M m m = M 1 M m m 1 1 M T 1 = M 1 M m m m 1 1 M T 1 = M 1 m 1 M M M similarly T = M 1 m M M M Ready to substitute the numbers: M = 1115 938 140 MeV = 37 MeV T 1 = 5.6 MeV (proton) T = 31.7 MeV (pion) Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 3 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Problem 3: In a collision process a particle of mass m in the laboratory, is struck by a particle of mass, M, momentum, P LAB, and total energy, E LAB. (1) Show that: W = M m me LAB where W is the total energy at the center of mass system of the two particles. () Show that the momentum before the collision at the center of mass frame given by: p * = m P LAB W (3) Show that the center of mass system of the two particles is boosted by: Solution: cms = P LAB m E LAB and = m E LAB W Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 4 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 5 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 6 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 7 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 8 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Problem 4: In an elastic scattering process the incident particle of mass M imparts energy to the stationary target of mass m. The energy E lost by the incident particle appears as recoil kinetic energy of the energy of the target. (1) Show that the kinetic energy transferred to the target particle at the lab frame is given by: E = m P LAB 1 cos * W where * is the angle of the outgoing particles with respect the direction of the boost at the CM frame. () Show that if M m the maximum kinetic energy of the recoil particle at the lab frame is: E max = m where, are characteristic to the incident particle. Solution: Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 9 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

We will use here all the formulas from the previous problem: = P LAB E LAB m (P-1) = E LAB m W (P3-) (P-1) and (P-) imply that: = P LAB W (P3-3) The momentum of the target particle in CMS before the collision is: P * = m P LAB W = m The energy of the target particle before the collision is: E * = m 0 = m The kinetic energy transferred to the target particle is: E = E 4 LAB m (1) So the idea is to find the energy of the target particle after the collision in the CMS frame and the boot back to the laboratory frame. In an elastic process at the CMS we have: E 4 * = E * ; q * = P * Hence, E 4 LAB = [ m m q ] E 4 LAB = m m cos * E 4 LAB = m m cos * () Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 10 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

from (1) and () we have: E = m m cos * m = m 1 m cos * E = m m cos * = m 1 cos * Using (P3-3) we get that: E = m P LAB 1 cos * W Hence, the maximum kinetic energy is transferred when the recoil particle goes forward, i.e. when cos * = 1. This result can be written as: E MAX = m P LAB = W m P LAB = M m me LAB m 1 m M me LAB M If m m E LAB M (valid only for incident particles of low energy) then we obtain almost the formula often seen in books and used in calculating the Bethe-Bloch equation: E MAX = m Not exactly because the relativistic, here refer to the CMS boost where in Bethe- Bloch they refer to the incident particle. For this we need another approximation: = P LAB E LAB m = P LAB E LAB 1 m 1 E LAB = P LAB E LAB 1 m E LAB... 1 if m E LAB which is usually the case. After this we have: E MAX = m 1 1 Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 11 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Problem 5: A narrow pencil beam of singly charged particles of very high momentum p, traveling along the x-axis traverses a slab of material s radiation lengths in thickness. If ionization loss can be neglected, calculate the rms lateral spread of the beam in the y- direction, as it emerges from the slab. Use the formula you derive to compute the rms lateral spread of a beam of 10 GeV/c muons in traversing a 100 m pipe filled with (a) air (b) helium at NTP. The particle data book shows that the radiation length in air X AIR 0 = 36.66 g /cm and the density of air is AIR = 1.93 g / l where in Helium He they are X 0 = 94.3 g/cm and AIR = 0.1786 g/l Solution: d PLANE = 1 MeV p[ MeV ] dx X 0 (1) From (1) and () we have that: dy = d x d PLANE () y d = dy 0 = 1 MeV p[ MeV ] 0 d d x dx X 0 y = 1 MeV p [ MeV ] 1 X 0 d 3 3 y = 1 MeV p [ MeV ] 1 s X 0 3 X 0 3 y = 1 MeV p [ MeV ] s 3 3 X 0 y = 3 1 MeV s p[ MeV ] 3 X 0 (A) Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 1 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

So this is the general result and we will be using this to calculate the answers for this problem. First lets convert the radiation lengths of air and helium in centimeters: X 0 AIR [ cm] = 36.66 cm = 8350.5 cm = 83.5m 3 1.93 10 X 0 He [cm] = 94.3 cm = 58107.5cm = 581m 3 0.1786 10 Muons at 10 GeV are relativistic particles so they have 1. So now we have everything we need to to compute the beam spread in centimeters. From (A) we have that: y AIR = 5.1cm and y He = 1. cm Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 13 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Problem 6: A sampling electromagnetic calorimeter uses 1.5 mm thick iron plates as an the absorber spaced by.0 mm layers of liquid Argon (originally developed by Willis and Radeka). The MIP values for Argon and Iron are 1.519 MeV g 1 cm and 1.451 MeV g 1 cm respectively. The density of Argon is Ar = 1.396 g/ cm 3 and that of iron is Fe = 7.870 g/ cm 3. Iron has atomic number Z Fe = 6, an average mass number of A Fe = 55.85 and X 0 Fe = 1.76 cm. a) Compute the sampling fraction of this calorimeter. Assume that after the electromagnetic shower is formed all charged particles behave as minimum ionizing particles and compute the energy losses using the Bethe-Bloch equation. b) Compute the critical energy for the absorber of the calorimeter. c) Estimate the coefficient of the stochastic term of the calorimeter resolution if the energy cut off correction is F = 0.869. d) Compute the number of sampling elements (pairs of absorber and active material) required to contain at least 95% of showers coming from electrons of energy 30 GeV. e) Suppose that electrons illuminate the calorimeter. As electron strike the front face of the calorimeter one has to take in to account edge effects. That is energy missmeasurement due to electrons whose shower escapes transversely from the sides of the calorimeter. Assuming that the impact point of the electrons at the front face is known (for example via some tracking device placed in front of the calorimeter) how far does this impact point need to be from the edge of the calorimeter so that the shower is also 95% contained also in the transverse direction? Solution: (a) The sampling ratios is the ratio of the energy deposition of a minimum ionizing particle in the active material over the energy deposition of the same particle in the absorber: f = d Act d E dx Act d Act d E dx d Abs d E Act dx As f = 0.cm 1.519 MeV g 1 cm 1.396 g cm 3 0. cm 1.519 MeV g 1 cm 1.396 g cm 3 0.15cm 1.451 MeV g 1 cm 7.87 gcm 3 f = 0.198 f 0% Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 14 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

Hence, 0% of the energy is seen in the active material and the other is absorbed in the absorber. (b) The critical energy for Iron can be calculated using the formula: E c = 610 MeV Z 1.4 = 610 MeV 6 1.4 =.39 MeV (c)the stochastic term of the resolution is given by: E E = E c d Fe f E X 0 F =.39 MeV 0.15 cm 0. 1000 MeV 1.76 cm E [GeV ] = 0.098 E [GeV ] E E = 9.8 % E [GeV ] Notice that : E E c d Fe X 0 is simply the number of particle in the shower corresponding to a given energy. The factor fe = E vis gives the visible energy by this calorimeter. That is the energy deposited on the active material. In this process we lose some particles because the energy they deposit is below the threshold that will activate the calorimeter in a measurable way and this is take case by F. (d) As we have seen in the course the number of radiation lengths to contain the shower increases logarithmically (base e) with energy. As we have seen in the course in a calorimeter a new generation of particles is crated for every X 0 that the particles traverse until the reach critical energy and start loosing energy via the ionization process. t max = ln E E c 0.5[ X 0 ] = ln 3104.39 0.5 [ X 0 ] = 6.7 X 0 = 11.8 cm So after 8 sampling elements we have shower maximum. To contain the shower to 95% level we need: Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 15 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch

t 95 % = t max 0.08 Z 9.6 [ X 0 ] = 18.4 X 0 Hence, after 11 sampling elements we have contained 95% of the shower. However in practice experiments wish to contain if possible all the shower and they use calorimeters of about 6 X 0 or more. (e) One can estimate the Moliere radius from: R M 1 MeV E c [ X 0 ] = 1.65cm or from : R M = 7A Z [ g cm ] where one has to divide by the density of iron to get: R M 7A Z 1 7 55.85 cm = cm = 1.9cm Fe 6 7 which is not very far from the previous result. The student should get from this an idea on the accuracy of these estimates. Typically as we have learned we get 95% transverse containment if we go a disance of twice the Molier radius from the shower center. Hence, R 95 % 14A Z 1 14 55.85 cm = cm = 3.8 cm Fe 6 7 In other words: Electrons that have an impact point about 4 cm from the edges of the calorimeter, they have their energies miss-measured because part of the shower escapes in the transverse direction. Lecturer: Prof. C. Foudas, F3.303 16 Costas.Fountas@cern.ch