Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation

Similar documents
ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

Should you have any questions regarding this clarification, please contact the undersigned at or (925)

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

Roy Pyle March 24, 2017 Chief Facilities Planner Contra Costa Community College District 500 North Court Street Martinez, CA 94533

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Sacramento Modesto Roseville Pleasanton September 19, 2013 Marcia Medina GHD Inc. 417 Montgomery Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA Subject: GE

2. Initial Summary of Preliminary Expert Opinion of Converse and Psomas Reports

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

Advanced Geologic Exploration, Inc.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

Re: Steep Slope Assessment for 2465 Waverly Drive, Blind Bay, BC; Legal Address: Lot 39, Section 18, Township 22, Range 10, Plan 25579, W6M, KDYD.

FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

NOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

In this lab, we will study and analyze geologic maps from a few regions, including the Grand Canyon, western Wyoming, and coastal California.

patersongroup Consulting Engineers April 20, 2010 File: PG1887-LET.01R Novatech Engineering Consultants Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

EXHIBIT H LOT 317 GRADING AND SITE PLAN

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

UNDERSTANDING GEOLOGIC M APS

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report


Additional Testing for Padre Dam Eastern Service Area Secondary Connection- Alternative Site Location, San Diego County, California

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

Appendix C - Geotechnical Report. Landmark Consultants, Inc.

16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

SUMMARY OF SOIL CONDITIONS CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT JIMMY DURANTE BOULEVARD, VIA DE LA VALLE, AND CAMINO DEL MAR DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS

Setting MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS I AND J INITIAL STUDY 5. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Issue

Geotechnical Geologic Coastal Environmental

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Landslide Mapping and Hazard Analysis for a Natural Gas Pipeline Project

Seismically Induced Ground Failure

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

CITY OF MORRO BAY WRFCAC Presentation May 3, 2016

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant)

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

November 16, 2016 Revised August 15, 2017 File No Trammell Crow Company 2221 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200 El Segundo, California 90245

WHITE POINT LANDSLIDE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION November 29, 2012 Status Report

Saganashkee Slough - McMahon Woods Section 506 Great Lakes Fishery & Ecosystem Restoration Study

Data Report for White Point Landslide Boring B-12 W.O. E Task Order Solicitation San Pedro District Los Angeles, California

4.10 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Tsunami Simulations after the Mw7.5 78km N of Palu, Indonesia September 28, 2018

Methodology for Estimating Floodwater Depths from Remote Sensing Flood Inundation Maps and Topography

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA OPERATING LLC LOCATION EXCEPTION. Report of the Administrative Law Judge

SURVEY OF SUBMERGED NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES IN LAKE CHELAN WASHINGTON

Gateway Trail Project

PROJECT SITE. Ione St. VICINITY MAP. Sutter. Creek. Jackson. Newman Ridge Quarry Project Amador County, California. Scale in Miles. Old. Rd.

February 18, 2003 File: NORTH CENTRAL REGION LANDSLIDE ASSESSMENT HWY 43:16 WHITECOURT EAST HILL (NC1) 2002 ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR VERIFICATION OF CORPS JURISDICTION

Appendix D Rock Blasting Report

Location Restrictions Certification Report NIPSCO Michigan City Generating Station Boiler Slag Pond

LANDUSE APPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MAPS CALIFORNIA EXPERIENCE

Finding Fault Geologic History from a Road Cut

US Highway 14 Streetscape Workgroup Meeting Notice and Agenda. Thursday, January 22, :00 pm

LAB 5: LANDSLIDE RECOGNITION AND MAPPING

In the early morning hours of

ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF THE STANLEY MINE ADVENTURE PARK AREA CLEAR CREEK COUNTY, COLORADO. Prepared for:

APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

AUTHORIZE THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT GEOLOGY AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT

STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF SHANE LANDER (GEOTECHNICAL - QD2) ON BEHALF OF MURPHYS DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

Assessing Slope Instabilities. Victoria Leffel & Joey Franzino

December 13, Kirk Shields Green Mountain Power 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446

SECTION 3. Housing. EAppendix E GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Mountain Valley Pipeline Project FERC Docket No. CP

The subject paper is being submitted for approval for publication in the annual volume entitled Geological Survey Research.

GEOLOGIC REVIEW AND RECONNAISSANCE

Geophysical Methods for Screening and Investigating Utility Waste Landfill Sites in Karst Terrain

August 14, James Bolton 312 Perry Lane Lovingston, VA

The Seattle-area geologic mapping project and the geologic framework of Seattle

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

August 10, 2007 File:

Archaeological Survey and Evaluation at 8954 El Dorado Parkway, El Cajon, San Diego County, California

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

PW Parkway ES Prince William County, Virginia WSSI #

4.7 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY

appendix e: geologic and seismic hazards

depression above scarp scarp

THE MAMMOTH "EARTHQUAKE FAULT" AND RELATED FEATURES IN MON0 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA* By H. BENIOFF and B. GUTENBERG

Lab Topographic Maps. Name: Partner: Purpose. Background Information

ADDITIONAL PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE UMORE PARK SAND AND GRAVEL MINING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA

GEOLOGY AND SOILS. This chapter summarizes geologic and geotechnical aspects of the site as they relate to the Project.

East Bay Plain Basin. EBMUD & City of Hayward. Groundwater Reliability Partnership Meeting March 22, 2017

Transcription:

I Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Dry Creek/Mount Veeder Winery P17-00343 & P17-00345 Planning Commission Hearing April 18, 2018

Condor Project No. 7464 September 8, 2017 Thomas F. Carey c/o Law Office of Thomas F. Carey PO Box 5662 Napa, CA 94581 Subject: Preliminary Geologic Hazards Evaluation Proposed Winery and Wine Cave Dry Creek-Mt. Veeder Project Oakville Winery, LLC, Napa County, California APN 027-310-039 Dear Mr. Carey: As requested, Condor Earth (Condor) has reviewed the subject project site conditions, available published data, and in accordance with our discussion during our initial meeting and consultation proposal, we herein present our preliminary finding regarding geologic site constraints. SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION In summary, our preliminary findings indicate that the proposed winery and cave improvements are capable of being developed at the location shown on the attached Figures. However, as per Section 15.08.050 of the Napa County Code, a comprehensive Geologic Hazards Report will be required at the time of Building Permit submittal for this project. During the period of January through July 2017, Condor performed site reconnaissance and observations on several occasions, and met with the project team to discuss the proposed project components. Condor also reviewed published literature, and available aerial and topographic data related to the site conditions. Our findings are based on review of this information, as well as our experience during the design and construction of numerous wineries and wine caves in the area. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS The parcel is located adjacent to the intersection of Mt. Veeder Road and Dry Creek Road, and much of the parcel occupies the nose of a topographic spur ridge that faces to the east, as shown on Figure 1. A topographic lower flat is present at the northeast corner of the parcel where previous farming activities are evident, adjacent to Dry Creek. Two water supply wells have recently been completed adjacent to the lower flat (Figures 2A and 2B). It appears that some decades ago, trees were cleared from a moderately sloping area comprising several acres adjacent to the lower flat; the old cleared tree line is shown on Figures 2A and 2B. Overhead powerlines cross the lower flat and extend over the nose of the spur ridge (area cleared of trees due to the low height of the power lines above the ground). A steep and prominent ridge line trends up to the west from the flat; approximately 1,000 feet horizontal and 300 feet vertical up the ridge the slopes flatten somewhat, where a clearing with bush occurs (forms a good reference point). A seasonal drainage is located to the south of the prominent ridge line, and roughly slits the

Preliminary Geologic Hazards Evaluation Dry Creek-Mt. Veeder Project Oakville Winery, LLC Page 2 parcel along an approximate east-west line into northern and southern sections. A high flat occurs near the west parcel boundary in the southern sections of the parcel (Figures 2A and 2B). Other than the wells and power lines mentioned above, no other permanent improvements were observed on the parcel. The site geology appears to be challenging for development of site improvements in many areas of the parcel, but one area has good potential. We reviewed two published geologic maps that cover the parcel area, which are shown on Figures 3A and 3B. Figure 3A suggests that the entire parcel, except for a small portion of the lower flat, is underlain by a massive landslide. Figure 3B shows an alternate geologic interpretation, suggesting that the parcel is underlain by in-place rock of the Great Valley Sequence (shale and sandstone). Figure 4 illustrates that no mapped potentially active faults traverse the site. Figure 5A suggests that the nearby massive landslides do not underlie the parcel, but that smaller landslide deposits are present in the vicinity of the old cleared tree area. Other common geologic hazards such as seismically induced or regional settlement, soils expansion/collapse, soil corrosivity, naturally occurring asbestos and radon, solution cavities, volcanism, tsunamis and floods do not appear to significantly affect this site, based on our site and literature review. Condor s preliminary evaluation of the site included studying aerial imagery including stereo-paired air photos (1:7200 scale BW dated 1988 and 1:12000 scale CIR dated 2000), LiDAR Hillshade (recent) and Google Earth (recent), and our on site reconnaissance. The information shown on Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the results of our preliminary landslide evaluation, which is described below. It appears that the parcel is most likely not underlain by a massive landslide deposit. We observed a continuous outcropping of a resistant sandstone bed that forms the spine of the prominent ridge, labeled rocky ridge on Figure 6. The presence of this continuous sandstone bed suggests that the ground is inplace (landslide deposits from the mostly shale Great Valley Sequence would be expected to be brokenup). In addition, our aerial imagery interpretation (Figure 7) suggests that the published landslide mapping (Figure 5A) is more accurate than Figure 3A. However, our observations of hummocky ground on site, coupled with our study of the aerial imagery, suggest that numerous smaller but not-recent landslides are present along the north flank of the rocky ridge and along the parcel-central seasonal drainage. Areas near the toe of slope adjacent to Well #1 and lower flat, near the clearing with bush, and near the upper flat appear more stable. The proposed winery and wine cave development area is located at the low end of the spur ridge, where the slopes are relatively low and not too steep, where the natural ground appears stronger, and where no old landslide features (scarps or hummocky ground) were observed. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS We suggest that, from a geologic hazards point of view, the area near the toe of slope and Well #1, and the adjacent area where the powerlines cross the nose of the ridge, are feasible areas for winery and cave development. Therefore, the project team selected this area for the proposed winery and cave development. We understand Well #1 will be abandoned to accommodate project construction. The area near the clearing with bush also appears feasible for the proposed wastewater disposal system from a geologic hazards standpoint.

Preliminary Geologic Hazards Evaluation Dry Creek-Mt. Veeder Project Oakville Winery, LLC Page 3 We recommend that subsurface geologic exploration (drilling and test pits) should be performed to confirm our findings prior to Building Permit submittal, as a part of the future Geologic Hazards Report mentioned in the Introduction of this letter. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Once the overall project scope is confirmed, Condor or another qualified firm(s) should provide design phase geologic and geotechnical services, including site investigation, geologic hazards report, geotechnical report for winery, cave and cave portals; tunnel/portal engineering; and construction phase services. To confirm site conditions prior to Building Permit and construction, we also recommend geologic/geotechnical exploration to investigate natural ground temperatures, potential groundwater seepage conditions, and to optimize the cave/portal design and estimate probable construction costs. Because subsurface conditions at this site appear to vary, it is not possible to include all details related to geologic and geotechnical engineering aspects of the project in designs. Geologic and geotechnical engineering recommendations depend on the possible need for adjustment in the field during construction. The adjustments depend on conditions revealed during construction that Condor could previously only assume based on limited data from this preliminary investigation. Therefore, Condor or another qualified firm(s) should perform geotechnical engineering observations and tests during earthwork, and during construction of retaining walls, foundations, tunnels and related project features. The purpose of the work during construction will be to check for subsurface conditions that vary from the conditions encountered during site investigation and to develop supplemental recommendations, as necessary. In addition, the purpose is to verify that the Contractor follows the general intent of our recommendations during construction and that they perform the geotechnical engineering aspects of the work according to the approved designs. LIMITATIONS The descriptions and other data contained in this letter are for project entitlement purposes for the proposed site development described above in Napa County, California. These data are not valid for other sites. The preliminary findings submitted in this letter are based upon the data obtained from a limited site reconnaissance, literature and data review, and on our experience in the project site vicinity. This letter does not reflect subsurface variations which may, and usually do, occur at project sites. The nature and extent of such variations will not likely become evident until subsurface investigation is performed and construction is initiated. The validity of the findings contained in this letter is also dependent upon proper engineering design, and an adequate testing and observation program during the construction phase. Our firm assumes no responsibility for construction compliance with the design concepts or recommendations unless we have been retained to perform onsite testing and observation during construction. This letter was prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standards of engineering geologic and geotechnical engineering practice that exists in Napa County at the time the letter was written. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. It is the Client s responsibility to see that all parties to the project, including the owner, designers, engineers, contractors, subcontractors, etc., are made aware of this letter and attachments.

CLOSURE Preliminary Geologic Hazards Evaluation Dry Creek-Mt. Veeder Project Oakville Winery, LLC Page 4 We trust this letter contains the information required. Please contact Scott Lewis at 209.536.7370 or 209.601.5585 with questions. Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by: Scott W. Lewis, CEG No. 1835 Andrew S. Kositsky, GE No. 2532 Principal Engineering Geologist Registered Geotechnical Engineer Cc: Mike Muelrath, Applied Civil Engineering Incorporated Attachments: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2A Aerial Image Figure 2B Site Topography 5 Foot Contours Figure 3A Geologic Map (Clahan, 2005) Figure 3B Geologic Map (Fox, 1973) Figure 4 Region Fault Map Figure 5A Landslide Map (plan) Figure 5B Landslide Map (legend) Figure 6 LiDAR Hillshade Figure 7 Oblique Aerial View X:\Project\7000_prj\7464 Oakville Winery Wine Cave\7464 Wine Cave\Reports\L 20170908 Dry Creek-Mt. Veeder Letter Report.docx

NORTH SITE LOCATION LAT: 38.2419 LONG: -122.2629

027-310-012-000 027-310-016-000 WELL #2 LOCATION Dry Creek CLEARING WITH BUSH OLD CLEARED TREE LINE!A POWER LINE DRY CREEK ROCKY RIDGE!A WELL #1 LOCATION SEASONAL DRAINAGE HIGH FLAT Mount Veeder X:\GIS\7000_PRJ\7464 Oakville Winery\MXD Parcel Boundaries are approximate as shown on County of Napa GIS Department, Parcels Public, Shapefile, Dated 17 January 2017 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Job No. 7464 AERIAL MAP DRY CREEK - MT. VEEDER PROJECT APN: 027-310-039 4290 MOUNT VEEDER ROAD NORTH 0 100 200 Scale in Feet FIGURE 2A 21663 Brian Lane Published Data P.O. Box 3905 Sonora, CA 95370 30 AUG 2017 Scale (209) 532-0361 fax (209) 532-0773 AS SHOWN Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, www.condorearth.com GeoEye, Earthstar Drawn Geographics, Chk'd CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and F2A the 20170830 GIS User Community KGM SWL NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558 7464 AERIAL.MXD

910 855 840 785 695 680 700 635 675 027-310-012-000 690 650 645 655 670 605 615 610 027-310-016-000 615 610 620 700 665 720 735 775 790 795 740 755 785 780 770 760 765 750 715 745 725 730 705 685 645 670 635 640 660 675 630 685 660 705 680 655 700 640 690 695 810 665 800 820 805 710 990 945 955 900 895 905 870 CLEARING WITH BUSH 770 790 755 750 OLD CLEARED TREE LINE 710!A 685 660 Dry Creek 605 WELL #2 LOCATION 600 POWER LINE 585 DRY CREEK 650 710 590 580 690 680 655 595 695 600 585 575 625 650 675 570 670 745 665 630 ROCKY RIDGE!A WELL #1 LOCATION 650 925 027-310-039-000 SEASONAL DRAINAGE 620 605 645 710 655 1050 1055 1040 1020 1035 1000 610 625 635 640 1075 1095 1090 1085 1080 1025 1010 995 975 935 1070 890 1065 1060 880 1015 1045 1030 1005 985 990 960 860 970 950 825 830 980 965 875 940 845 795 865 835 800 930 885 850 915 920 HIGH FLAT 820 815 805 810 780 765 775 760 725 740 735 730 715 720 705 640 630 21663 Brian Lane P.O. Box 3905 Sonora, CA 95370 (209) 532-0361 fax (209) 532-0773 www.condorearth.com Mount Veeder 645 650 705 715 740 725 780 730 750 790 770 Parcel Boundaries are approximate as shown on County of Napa GIS Department, Parcels Public, Shapefile, Dated 17 January 2017 Job No. Scale Drawn KGM 7464 Published Data 30 AUG 2017 AS SHOWN Chk'd SWL 805 735 775 700 720 CONTOUR MAP DRY CREEK - MT. VEEDER PROJECT APN: 027-310-039 4290 MOUNT VEEDER ROAD NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558 745 755 760 765 800 785 810 795 815 825 840 835 865 845 880 870 NORTH 830 820 875 0 100 200 Scale in Feet 850 890 905 885 860 855 FIGURE 2B F2B 20170830 7464 CONTOUR.MXD X:\GIS\7000_PRJ\7464 Oakville Winery\7464A Water Availability Anaylsis\MXD

NORTH SITE LOCATION

NORTH SITE LOCATION

Mt. Diablo Thrust+ + + + Glenn NORTH 0 30 Yuba Scale in Kilometers Colusa Lake Sutter Hunting Creek Maacama -Berryessa Great Valley 4a Sonoma North San Andreas West Napa Great Valley 4b Great Valley 5 Yolo SITE LOCATION Napa Sacram NORTHERN LIMIT OF RUPTURE 2014 SOUTH NAPA EARTHQUAKE Marin Solano Green Valley Connected San Jo Contra Costa Hayward-Rodgers Creek San Francisco Vernalis Fa FAULTS Legend Alameda Historic Holocene Late Pleistocene Early Quaternary + + Thrust Fault 21663 Brian Lane P.O. Box 3905 Sonora, CA 95370 (209) 532-0361 fax (209) 532-0773 www.condorearth.com X:\GIS\7000_PRJ\7464 Oakville Winery\MXD Job No. Published Data Scale Drawn KGM 7464 30 AUG 2017 AS SHOWN Chk'd SWL San Mateo Santa Clara USGS QUARTERNARY FAULT AND FOLD DATABASE OF THE UNITED STATES, 2008 REGIONAL FAULT MAP DRY CREEK - MT. VEEDER PROJECT APN: 027-310-039 4290 MOUNT VEEDER ROAD NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558 FIGURE 4 F4 20170830 7464 FAULT.MXD

NORTH 0 1,000 2,000 Scale in Feet PROJECT SITE ^ VICINITY MAP N.T.S SITE LOCATION SOURCE: RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOINTERPRETATION MAP OF LANDSLIDES IN 24 SELECTED 7.5-MINUTE QUADRANGLES IN LAKE, NAPA, SOLANO AND SONOMA COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA. M.J.DWYER 1975 21663 Brian Lane P.O. Box 3905 Sonora, CA 95370 (209) 532-0361 fax (209) 532-0773 www.condorearth.com Job No. 7464 Published Data 30 AUG 2017 Scale AS SHOWN Drawn KGM X:\GIS\7000_PRJ\7464 Oakville Winery\MXD Chk'd SWL PROJ. LAT.: 38.2419 N. PROJ. LONG.: -122.2633 W. USGS QUAD NAME: RUTHERFORD, CA LANDSLIDE MAP DRY CREEK - MT. VEEDER PROJECT APN: 027-310-039 4290 MOUNT VEEDER ROAD NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558 FIGURE 5A F5A 20170830 7464 LANDSLIDE.MXD

SOURCE: RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOINTERPRETATION MAP OF LANDSLIDES IN 24 SELECTED 7.5-MINUTE QUADRANGLES IN LAKE, NAPA, SOLANO AND SONOMA COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA. M.J.DWYER 1975 21663 Brian Lane P.O. Box 3905 Sonora, CA 95370 (209) 532-0361 fax (209) 532-0773 www.condorearth.com X:\GIS\7000_PRJ\7464 Oakville Winery\MXD Job No. Published Data Scale Drawn KGM 7464 30 AUG 2017 AS SHOWN Chk'd SWL LANDSLIDE MAP DRY CREEK - MT. VEEDER PROJECT APN: 027-310-039 4290 MOUNT VEEDER ROAD NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558 FIGURE 5B F5B 20170830 7464 LANDSLIDE-LEGEND

BURIED TOE OF SLOPE (APPROX.) 027-310-012-000 027-310-016-000 OLD CLEARED TREE LINE Dry Creek Old Slides DRY CREEK CLEARING POWER LINE ROCKY RIDGE!A WELL #1 LOCATION Old Slides SEASONAL DRAINAGE OLD SLIDE SCARP TOE OF SLOPE HIGH FLAT Mount Veeder 21663 Brian Lane P.O. Box 3905 Sonora, CA 95370 (209) 532-0361 fax (209) 532-0773 www.condorearth.com X:\GIS\7000_PRJ\7464 Oakville Winery\MXD Parcel Boundaries are approximate as shown on County of Napa GIS Department, Parcels Public, Shapefile, Dated 17 January 2017 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Job No. Scale Drawn KGM 7464 Published Data 30 AUG 2017 AS SHOWN Chk'd SWL LIDAR HILSHADE - LIGHT AZMUUTH 135 DRY CREEK - MT. VEEDER PROJECT APN: 027-310-039 4290 MOUNT VEEDER ROAD NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558 NORTH 0 100 200 Scale in Feet FIGURE 6 F6 20170830 7464 LiDAR.MXD

SITE LOCATION