Review of Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at the Money Pit ( ) Oak Island, Nova Scotia

Similar documents
THE MONEY PIT OAK ISLAND, NOVA SCOTIA

10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM

Early Exploration Permit Activity Information

Early Exploration Plan Activity Information

Department of National Defence B-Jetty Reconstruction

iii CONTENTS vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Study Area Data Sources Preparation of Geologic Maps

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

Applied Geophysics for Environmental Site Characterization and Remediation

Development of geophysical investigation for verifying treatment efficiency of underground cavities

Exploration Drilling Techniques

Geophysical Exploration in Water Resources Assessment. John Mundell, P.E., L.P.G., P.G. Ryan Brumbaugh, L.P.G. Mundell & Associates, Inc.

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Horizontal Directional Drilling: An Approach to Design and Construction. Presenter: John Briand, PE Co-Author: Danielle Neamtu, PE

Geotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II. Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1

16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN

Hydrogeology of Deep Borehole Disposal for High-Level Radioactive Waste

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

SYDNEY MARINE TERMINAL Second Berth Progress

Instructional Objectives

Geophysics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications

EXTREMELY FAST IP USED TO DELINEATE BURIED LANDFILLS. Norman R. Carlson, Cris Mauldin Mayerle, and Kenneth L. Zonge

Ground-Water Exploration in the Worthington Area of Nobles County: Summary of Seismic Data and Recent Test Drilling Results

2 OVERVIEW OF SHALLOW BOREHOLE INVESTIGATIONS

Drilling. What is the Activity?

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION Simple visual examination of soil at the surface or from shallow test pits. Detailed study of soil and groundwater to a

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling

Underground Risk Management Course Marina Del Rey, California November, Geotechnical Data Reports. Greg Raines, PE

Rotary Drilling Rotary Drilling Bits

Amistad Dam Investigation and Oversight: Karst- Founded Dam on the USA-Mexico Border

KARST MAPPING WITH GEOPHYSICS AT MYSTERY CAVE STATE PARK, MINNESOTA

Instructional Objectives

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation

Ship heave effects while drilling: observations from Legs 185 & 188

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

GEOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND MATERIALS SGM210

Drainage Used to Control Movements of a Large Rock Slide in Canada

SITE INVESTIGATION 1

Geologging Imagery, Applications and Geological Interpretation. Shea Altadonna 1, Jim Fulton 2, E.I.T.

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

Deep Borehole Disposal Performance Assessment and Criteria for Site Selection

Site Investigations and Geotechnical Risk For Underground Construction Greg Raines, PE

Application of Ground Penetrating Radar for hydro-geological study

GEOPHYSICAL IMAGING TO ENHANCE ANALYSIS, DESIGN AND DRILLING OF LARGE-SCALE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS. Abstract

BELFAST SEWERS PROJECT

GEOTECHNICAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 5 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PLANNING GUIDELINES

Computer Modeling and Surface Geophysics Unravel the Mystery of Salt Water Intrusion on Long Island

Update on the seismic evaluation of the plans for Shaft #4 in the Cayuga Salt Mine, New York State April 11, 2017

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

Geophysical Site Investigation (Seismic methods) Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

R.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE. HELAVA CREEKl MILE MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973

MARKET UPDATE ON URANIUM AND GOLD PROJECTS

Lecture 15: Subsidence

GEOL.3250 Geology for Engineers Glacial Geology

patersongroup Mineral Aggregate Assessment 3119 Carp Road Ottawa, Ontario Prepared For Mr. Greg LeBlanc March 7, 2014 Report: PH2223-REP.

DESIGN-PHASE GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK MODELING FOR LARGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Buried-valley Aquifers: Delineation and Characterization from Reflection Seismic and Core Data at Caledon East, Ontario

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

FORENSIC GEOLOGY A CIVIL ACTION

ontribution of Geotechnical and Rock echanics design to vertical shaft nking and design

How to Interpret Mining Company Drill Reports & Announcements

BUFFALO RIVER COALITION PO Box 101, Jasper, AR (870)

GeothermEx, Inc. GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION HOLE PROGRAM, KILAUEA EAST RIFT ZONE, HAWAII TASK 1 REPORT

1. Rock Mechanics and mining engineering

USE OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS FOR FILL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUANTITY ESTIMATION AT BROWNFIELD SITES A CASE HISTORY. Abstract

Proposed Cemetery Thornhill Road. Tier One Hydrogeological Risk Assessment. Peter Mitchell Associates

The UK GeoEnergy Test Bed Ceri J Vincent British Geological Survey

GPR AS A COST EFFECTIVE BEDROCK MAPPING TOOL FOR LARGE AREAS. Abstract

Major Points in Introduction

RADON EMANOMETRY CASE STUDIES IN NAMIBIA : THE SPITZKOPPE AND TUMAS URANIUM DEPOSITS

Electrical Resistivity Survey for Delineating Seawater Intrusion in a Coastal Aquifer

Rock Suitability Classification for POPLU

OVERVIEW OF THE WAIRAKEI-TAUHARA SUBSIDENCE INVESTIGATION PROGRAM

Provincial Standards for Early Exploration

Location of Abandoned Water Wells by Magnetic Surveys over the Edwards Aquifer in the San Antonio Area, Texas. Abstract. 1.

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION. 2. THE D.C. RESISTIVITY METHOD 2.1 Equipment 2.2 Survey Procedure 2.3 Data Reduction

Geological Mapping using Geophysics

September 18, 2017 Project No.: 5077

Aquitard Characterization The Legend of Indiana s Magic Clay Layer. Juliet Port, LPG #2214 July 2014

On August 10, 2017, I conducted an inspection of the exploration site associated with Permit PR The inspection report is attached.

How to Identify and Properly Classify Drill Cuttings

Background. Valley fills Sites in the Area. Construction over Mine Spoil Fills

IMAGING OF DEEP SINKHOLES USING THE MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY IMPLANT TECHNIQUE (MERIT) CASE STUDIES IN FLORIDA

ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF THE STANLEY MINE ADVENTURE PARK AREA CLEAR CREEK COUNTY, COLORADO. Prepared for:

Glacial Geology of Moose Point State Park, ME

Manual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC

Pit Slope Optimization Based on Hydrogeologic Inputs

Hydrogeology of Karst NE Wisconsin. Dr. Maureen A. Muldoon UW-Oshkosh Geology Department

Mustafa Saribudak Environmental Geophysics Associates, 2000 Cullen Avenue, Number 7, Austin, TX, 78757, USA,

A Case Study in Integrating Core into an Oil Field Development

Drilled Shaft Foundations in Limestone. Dan Brown, P.E., Ph.D. Dan Brown and Associates

ambiguity in earth sciences IESO Geophysics Section Eddy hartantyo, Lab Geofisika FMIPA UGM

AWRA PMAS Engineers Club of Philadelphia. A Geologic Perspective on Stormwater

GM 1.4. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 639

LAB: Water Movement in the Ground Adapted from Exploration in Earth Science, The Physical Setting, United Publishing Company, Inc

Antelope Hills Directionally Drilled Water Well. Theresa Jehn-Dellaport Jehn Water Consultants, Inc.

BOREHOLE GEOPHYSICAL LOGGING IN UNCONSOLIDATED SEDIMENTS -AN AID TO 3-D 3 D MAPPING. J.A. Hunter Geological Survey of Canada

Table 5-1 Sampling Program Summary for Milltown Ford Avenue Redevelopment Area, NJ.

Transcription:

Review of Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at the Money Pit (1967 2005) Oak Island, Nova Scotia Money Pit Presentation By Les MacPhie August 13, 2005 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 1

Outline of Presentation 1. Purpose of Review 2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit Prior to 1967 5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 6. Options for Future Exploration 7. Conclusions and Acknowledgements Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 2

1. Purpose of Review 1. Provide a summary of the geotechnical conditions at the Money Pit as they affect conceptual studies for a deep shaft. 2. Evaluate the archaeological findings at the Money Pit. 3. Discuss possible options for future exploration. 4. Share information and ideas with the ultimate objective of solving the Oak Island Mystery by the cooperative effort of researchers and interested parties. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 3

Outline of Presentation 1. Purpose of Review 2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit Prior to 1967 5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 6. Options for Future Exploration 7. Conclusions and Acknowledgements Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 4

2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 1. Geological setting 2. Geotechnical programs 3. Geotechnical sections 4. Tidal hydrogeology, anhydrite solubility, flow system in anhydrite Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 5

Geological Section of Oak Island 160 Feet Glacial Till Money Pit 200 Feet Anhydrite Bedrock Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 6

Geotechnical Programs 1. Based on the important archaeological findings in the Becker holes in 1967 (to be presented later), geotechnical and archaeological holes were drilled in the area of the Money Pit in 1969 and 1970. 2. In 1969 Warnock Hersey put down 3 geotechnical holes in the Money Pit area and a number of archaeological holes. 3. In 1970 Golder Associates put down 4 geotechnical holes in the Money Pit area and 4 archaeological holes northeast of the Money Pit. 4. Archaeological holes were intended to investigate original workings and also provided geotechnical data. 5. Borehole depths at the Money Pit will be with reference to existing ground surface which is about 10 feet lower than original ground surface. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 7

Plan of Geotechnical Boreholes Section A-A 10X Section B-B 10X Photo Fence Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 8

Geotechnical Section A-A at Money Pit and 10X Money Pit 10X Glacial Till Broken Anhydrite Competent Anhydrite Note Historical shafts, tunnels and drill holes are not shown Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 9

Geotechnical Section B-B at Money Pit and Dunfield Excavation Photo Money Pit Dunfield Excavation Glacial Till Broken Anhydrite Hedden Shaft Intact Chappell Shaft Collapsed Competent Anhydrite Note Historical shafts, tunnels and drill holes are not shown Dunfield Excavation 1965/66 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 10

Plan of Woods Hole Tidal Hydrogeology Testing in July 1995 Water Level Recorded in 10X Good Tidal Response Water Level Recorded in Triton Shaft No Tidal Response Water Level Recorded in Hole 93-03 Limited Tidal Response Tidal Level Recorded in Mahone Bay The salinity of the groundwater in the anhydrite is about 50 to 75 % that of sea water Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 11

Water Level Variation in 10X from Tidal Variation in Mahone Bay 1.5 m 1 Hour 0.65 m Time Lag 1 Hour (Between Peaks) Ratio of Amplitudes = 0.43 (0.65/1.5) Ref: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Measurements made in July 1995 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 12

Water Level Variation in Coarse Rockfill Dump from Tidal Variation in Rupert Inlet Well W2 1000 m Well W2 60 m Flow reversals occur in the rock dump in phase with the tide Ref: BHP Billiton Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 13

Water Level Variation in Coarse Rockfill Dump from Tidal Variation in Rupert Inlet 2.0 Water Levels in Rupert Inlet and Rock Dump Well W2 1 Hour 1.5 1.0 Water Level (m) 0.5 0.0-0.5 2.3 m 3.4 m -1.0-1.5 Rupert inlet W2-2.0 30 Jun 0h 30 Jun 6h 30 Jun 12h 30 Jun 18h 1 Jul 0h Distance 100 m 190 m 300 m 1 Jul 6h 1 Jul 12h 1 Jul 18h 2 Jul 0h Time 2 Jul 6h 2 Jul 12h 2 Jul 18h 3 Jul 0h 3 Jul 6h 3 Jul 12h 3 Jul 18h 4 Jul 0h Time Lag 1 Hour (Between Peaks) Ratio of Amplitudes = 0.68 (2.3/3.4) Ref: BHP Billiton Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 14

Lab Scale Testing of Anhydrite Solubility Ref: James 1978 36 mm Diameter (1.4 in) 360 mm (14 in) 36 mm Diameter (1.4 in) Distilled water flow at 56 ml/day (2 fluid oz/day) for 44 days 2.5 mm 6 mm Diameter Diameter Before After Test Test Sketch to Scale Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 15

Example Flow System through Anhydrite from Mahone Bay to Money Pit and 10X The flow system through anhydrite is activated by pumping at the Money Pit or 10X. When there is no pumping the groundwater in the anhydrite is subject to flow reversals in phase with tidal variations. Both of these water movement systems result in dissolution of anhydrite and increasing permeability with time. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 16

Outline of Presentation 1. Purpose of Review 2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit Prior to 1967 5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 6. Options for Future Exploration 7. Conclusions and Acknowledgements Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 17

3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 1. Ron Aston from North Carolina 1999 and 2001 2. Petter Amundsen from Norway 2003 3. Drilled Boulder at Money Pit Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 18

Plan of Ron Aston Search Area Ron Aston Search Area Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 19

Ron Aston and Others 2001 Murray MacPhie Jim Harvey David Tobias Ron Aston David Tobias Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 20

Ron Aston Drilling Program August 2001 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 21

Boulder in Glacial Till Exposed by Aston 2001 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 22

Large Boulder at Shore Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 23

Plan of Petter Amundsen Search Area 2003 Petter Amundsen. Search Area.. 282 Ft.... 141 Ft Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 24

Happy Norwegians May 2003 Eric Hauan Petter Amundsen Tony Ronning Sigbjorn Larsen Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 25

Boulder 282 Feet South of Cross Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 26

Boulders at Shore Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 27

Boulder 141 Feet South of Cross Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 28

Drilled Boulder at Money Pit Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 29

Summary of Geological, Geotechnical and Other Issues for Deep Excavation at Money Pit 1. Boulders in glacial till 2. Open and soil filled cavities in broken anhydrite 3. Saline groundwater in anhydrite 4. Cyclic groundwater movement in anhydrite due to tides 5. Reworked soil zones resulting from events such as collapse of the Money Pit in 1861 and the Dunfield excavation of 1965/66 6. The presence of timbers and debris from numerous previous shafts and tunnels in the area of the Money Pit 7. Steel casings and pipes from previous drilling operations Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 30

Outline of Presentation 1. Purpose of Review 2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit Prior to 1967 5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 6. Options for Future Exploration 7. Conclusions and Acknowledgements Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 31

4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit prior to 1967 1. Parchment in Oak Island Treasure Company Shaft 1897 2. Poll Pick, Felling Axe and Anchor Fluke in Chappell Shaft 1937 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 32

Plan of Shafts at Money Pit Parchment Pick, Axe and Anchor Fluke Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 33

Parchment Location from Drilling in Oak Island Treasure Company Shaft 1897 Parchment Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 34

Photo of Parchment from Oak Island Treasure Company Shaft 1897 Parchment is 5 / 16 inches long Photo from Triton Alliance Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 35

Location of Pick, Axe and Anchor Fluke in Chappell Shaft 1931 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 36

Pick, Axe and Anchor Fluke Chappell Shaft 1931 123 Feet 127 Feet 116 Feet Photo from Triton Alliance Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 37

Poll Pick Chappell Shaft 1931 Photos from Triton Alliance Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 38

Anglo American Felling Axe Chappell Shaft 1931 Photos from Triton Alliance Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 39

Anglo American Axes (1725 1800) Photos from Ancient Carpenters Tools by Mercer Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 40

Outline of Presentation 1. Purpose of Review 2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit Prior to 1967 5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 6. Options for Future Exploration 7. Conclusions and Acknowledgements Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 41

5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 1. Becker Drilling Program 1967 2. Pollen count results from Golder Holes 1970 3. Five deep holes for detection program in 1993 provide lateral drift data 4. Archaeological plan and sections Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 42

Becker Drill Setup 1967 Drive Pipe 5.5 o. d. Inside Pipe 3 i. d. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 43

Becker Drilling Program in 1967 The objective of the Becker drilling program was to drill through overburden to bedrock surface in search of the presumed treasure chests at 100 and 150 feet. The first 10 holes extended to bedrock surface at depths of 145 to 165 feet. The 11 th hole (B11) extended to a depth of 200 feet before bedrock was encountered. Puddled clay was found from 184 to 200 feet and two oak buds were found embedded in the puddled clay at 196 feet. This singular finding initiated the extension of all holes to 200 feet with the use of tricone drilling in bedrock. 40 holes were drilled at the Money Pit from January to June 1967. The drilling resulted in the major milestone of finding man made cavities in the bedrock at 200 feet and this was completely unexpected. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 44

Plan of First 11 Becker Holes at Money Pit 11 th Hole Deep Rock 200 Feet and Oak Buds First 10 Holes Shallow Rock 145 to 165 Feet Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 45

Plan of Deep Rock Area at Money Pit Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 46

Plan of Pollen Count Holes 1970 Holes with Pollen Count Dalhousie University 1970 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 47

Pollen Count Samples from G102 and G103 G102 Samples 36 and 37 Ancient Soil G103 Samples 27 and 30 Recent Soil Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 48

Lateral Drift in Five Deep Detection Holes 1993 Five deep holes to about 250 feet were put down in 1993 for a geophysical detection program. Lateral drift was measured in the 5 detection holes and in Hole W8. This provided an understanding of the importance of lateral drift which was not measured in the previous Becker Holes. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 49

Plan of Lateral Drift Meaurements Lateral Drift 17 Feet over 250 Feet Depth Lateral Drift in 3 holes 3 to 7 feet Lateral drift in 3 holes 15 to 17 feet Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 50

Plan of Archaeological Sections at Money Pit D C C D Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 51

Archaeological Section C-C at Money Pit Broken Anhydrite Brass Foil Competent Anhydrite Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 52

Archaeological Section D-D at Money Pit Broken Anhydrite Competent Anhydrite Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 53

Summary of Archaeological Features at Money Pit Brass, Oak Buds, Charcoal, Reworked Recent Soil (INFERRED CHAMBER) Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 54

Outline of Presentation 1. Purpose of Review 2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit Prior to 1967 5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 6. Options for Future Exploration 7. Conclusions and Acknowledgements Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 55

6. Options for Future Exploration 1. Option 1 Exploration boreholes with lateral drift measurements and downhole camera inspection to define the nature of man made workings and possibly to verify the presence of treasure and artifacts. If successful, this could lead to specific targets which could be accessed by a small diameter shaft. 2. Option 2 Excavation of a deep shaft of sufficient diameter to enclose the zone of man made workings at 200 feet depth. 3. Other options could be considered but it is noted that geophysics, including ground penetrating radar, have not been successful. 4. Today we will discuss only Option 2, the large diameter shaft. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 56

Archaeological Criteria for Shaft 1. Construction procedures should allow archaeological investigation as the shaft excavation proceeds. 2. The shaft diameter at bedrock surface should be of sufficient size to include the possible range of locations where the original Money Pit excavation extended below bedrock surface. 3. The shaft diameter at 200 feet depth should enclose a reasonable estimate of the lateral extent of the man-made chambers in bedrock. 4. Construction procedures should be available to allow excavation beyond the limits of the shaft so that possible tunnels can be explored. Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 57

Limit of Archaeological Features in Bedrock Speculated Limit of Features in Rock 70 Ft Diameter Brass, Oak Buds, Charcoal, Reworked Recent Soil (INFERRED CHAMBER) Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 58

Location and Diameter of Shaft Section Suggested Shaft Diameter 70 feet X Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 59

Schematic Section of Shaft Suggested Shaft Diameter 70 feet Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 60

Outline of Presentation 1. Purpose of Review 2. Geotechnical Investigations and Results 3. Boulders in Glacial Till at Oak Island 4. Selected Archaeological Findings at Money Pit Prior to 1967 5. Archaeological Findings at Money Pit 1967 to 2005 6. Options for Future Exploration 7. Conclusions and Acknowledgements Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 61

7. Conclusions 1. The geotechnical conditions have been defined to the extent required for conceptual studies of a shaft extending to 200 feet depth. 2. The archaeological evidence indicates that man made chambers exist in the bedrock at the Money Pit. 3. There is no physical evidence to indicate the nature of artifacts or treasure (if any) which may be contained in the man made chambers. 4. An investigation phase of borehole and downhole camera work may be considered to possibly verify the nature of the underground workings, to possibly define what is contained therein and to better define the location and diameter of a proposed shaft. 5. A shaft excavation to bedrock surface is expected to resolve the nature of the presumed chests with coins drilled at 100 feet in 1849 and 150 feet in 1897, and the parchment may be recovered. 6. A shaft excavation to 200 feet is expected to recover significant evidence (and possibly artifacts and treasure) which will result in: 1. An obvious solution to the mystery (possibly by recovery of the parchment) 2. A solution determined in conjunction with related historical and archaeological studies or verification 3. The Oak Island mystery is not resolved (very unlikely outcome) Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 62

7. Acknowledgements The permission of David Tobias and Dan Blankenship to present this information is gratefully acknowledged Oak Island Group Charles Brown Dan Blankenship Mrs. Sobey Bill Ulrich Bill Parkin???? Bill Sobey Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 63

Oak Island 1986 Geotechnical and Archaeological Conditions at Money Pit 64