UTILIZATION OF SEISMIC AND INFRASOUND SIGNALS FOR CHARACTERIZING MINING EXPLOSIONS. Southern Methodist University 1 Baylor University 2

Similar documents
REGIONAL OBSERVATIONS OF MINING BLASTS BY THE GSETT-3 SEISMIC MONITORING SYSTEM

The Unique Source Mechanism of an Explosively Induced Mine Collapse

AN ANALYSIS OF LARGE MINING BLASTS IN WYOMING AND CENTRAL ASIA

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

STUDY OF BROADBAND Lg/P AND ITS APPLICATION TO SOURCE DISCRIMINATION

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

CHARACTERIZATION OF MINING EXPLOSIONS AT REGIONAL DISTANCES: IMPLICATIONS WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF FROZEN ROCK ON EXPLOSIVE COUPLING

26th Seismic Research Review - Trends in Nuclear Explosion Monitoring

ANALYSIS OF INFRASOUND PROPAGATION AT REGIONAL DISTANCE BY MINING EXPLOSION

A Study of Mine Blasts and Rockbursts in the Pacific Northwest. Abstract

Improvements to Seismic Monitoring of the European Arctic Using Three-Component Array Processing at SPITS

MONITORING ROUTINE MINE SEISMICITY IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES

2011 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

SEISMIC CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARCTIC

Seismic source mechanisms for quarry blasts: modelling observed Rayleigh and Love wave radiation patterns from a Texas quarry

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

EXCITATION AND PROPAGATION OF SHORT-PERIOD SURFACE WAVES IN YOUNG SEAFLOOR. Donald W. Forsyth. Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

When Katrina hit California

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

revised October 30, 2001 Carlos Mendoza

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF NORTHEAST ASIA

Seismic Recording Station AZ_PFO Summary Report

SOURCE AND PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPLOSIVE AND OTHER SEISMIC SOURCES

26th Seismic Research Review - Trends in Nuclear Explosion Monitoring

Final Report for DOEI Project: Bottom Interaction in Long Range Acoustic Propagation

DR

W. Scott Phillips, EES-3

Earthquake Location regional triangulation with real data

TESTING THE DETONATOR ACCURACY USING VELOCITY OF DETONATION AND AIRBLAST METERS

Seismic Recording Station TA_109C Summary Report

2011 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Observations of Atmospheric Phenomena from USArray and ANZA Observing Systems

Kursk Explosion. by Brian Savage and Don V. Helmberger. Introduction. Underwater Explosive Sources

in Seismic Monitoring

A BROADBAND SEISMIC EXPERIMENT IN YUNNAN, SOUTHWEST CHINA. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Contract No.

EXCITATION AND ATTENUATION OF REGIONAL WAVES, AND MAGNITUDE DEPENDENCE OF PN/LG RATIOS IN EASTERN EURASIA

Seismic Characteristics and Mechanisms of Rockbursts

Observations of pp in the Short-Period Phases of NTS Explosions Recorded at Norway

of the San Jacinto Fault Zone and detailed event catalog from spatially-dense array data

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

Infrasounds from Venus quakes : Numerical modeling and balloon observation project

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies IMPROVED DEPTH-PHASE DETECTION AT REGIONAL DISTANCES

Correlating seismic wave velocity measurements with mining activities at Williams Mine

EFFECTS OF LOCAL METEOROLOGICAL VARIABILITY ON SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SEISMIC-ACOUSTIC SIGNALS

Absolute strain determination from a calibrated seismic field experiment

Application of Phase Matched Filtering on Surface Waves for Regional Moment Tensor Analysis Andrea Chiang a and G. Eli Baker b

Analysis of meteorological measurements made over three rainy seasons in Sinazongwe District, Zambia.

IDENTIFICATION OF ROCKBURSTS AND OTHER MINING EVENTS USING REGIONAL SIGNALS AT INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM STATIONS

Application of Nanoseismic Monitoring: Seismic characterization of slope dynamics caused by softrock-landslides: The Super-Sauze case study

Data Repository: Seismic and Geodetic Evidence For Extensive, Long-Lived Fault Damage Zones

San Jacinto Fault Zone and Sage Brush Flat High Frequency Experiments

ATTENUATION OF LG WAVES IN THE EASTERN TIBETAN PLATEAU. Jiakang Xie. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University

SEISMIC CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARCTIC

Analysis of the 29th May 2008 Ölfus earthquake and aftershock sequence using three-component t processing on ICEARRAY

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies ADVANCED WAVEFORM SIMULATION FOR SEISMIC MONITORING EVENTS

Acquisition and preliminary analysis of the Castle Mountain shallow VSP dataset

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

Seismic Sources. Seismic sources. Requirements; Principles; Onshore, offshore. Reading: Telford et al., Section 4.5 Sheriff and Geldart, Chapter 7

Magnitude 6.9 GULF OF CALIFORNIA

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

FULL MOMENT TENSOR ANALYSIS USING FIRST MOTION DATA AT THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL FIELD

Chapter 3. The Role of Seismology

Underlying Reasons for the Wide Range of Yield Estimates for the Underground Nuclear Explosion of September 3, 2017, in North Korea

Exercise 6. Solar Panel Orientation EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE. Introduction to the importance of solar panel orientation DISCUSSION

INFRASONIC SOURCE LOCATION OF THE APRIL 23, 2001, BOLIDE EVENT

T-PHASE OBSERVATIONS FROM THE MAY 1999 ASCENSION ISLAND EXPERIMENT. Arthur Rodgers and Philip Harben Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

DETECTION OF NATURALLY OCCURRING EVENTS FROM SMALL APERTURE INFRASOUND ARRAYS

EPICENTRAL LOCATION OF REGIONAL SEISMIC EVENTS BASED ON LOVE WAVE EMPIRICAL GREEN S FUNCTIONS FROM AMBIENT NOISE

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED MOMENT TENSOR SOFTWARE AT THE PROTOTYPE INTERNATIONAL DATA CENTER

Discrimination of blasts in mine seismology

Who is polluting the Columbia River Gorge?

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

Dallas-Fort Worth and Cleburne, TX

km. step. 0.5km. Ishihara km. al., Rayleigh. cavity. cavity

Estimation of S-wave scattering coefficient in the mantle from envelope characteristics before and after the ScS arrival

Towards Modelling Elastic and Viscoelastic Seismic Wave Propagation in Boreholes

Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack

MARKET UPDATE ON URANIUM AND GOLD PROJECTS

PHASE TIME INVERSION: A SIMPLE METHOD FOR REGIONAL WAVEFORM INVERSION. Charles A. Langston. University of Memphis

CEPSTRAL F-STATISIC PERFORMANCE AT REGIONAL DISTANCES. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Contract No. DSWA01-98-C-0142

Determining the Earthquake Epicenter: Japan

5.3 Scientific Viability of the USArray Transportable Array Network As a Real-Time Weather Monitoring Platform

2011 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

TWO SLOW SURFACE WAVES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA* By FRANK PRESS and MAURICE EWING

Earthquake Lab Introduction: Purpose: Method: Equipment needed: Fundamental Concepts and Key Terms:

Al 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER

Low-frequency tremor signals from a hydraulic fracture treatment in northeast British Columbia, Canada

Engineering Geophysical Application to Mine Subsidence Risk Assessment

INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS VOLCANO WATCH OPERATIONS GROUP (IAVWOPSG)

C. R. McKee and M. E. Hanson Lawrence Livermore Laboratory University of California Livermore, California 94550

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

Performance of the GSN station KONO-IU,

JOINT ACCURATE TIME-FREQUENCY AND HIGH-RESOLUTION ARRAY ANALYSIS, A TOOL FOR SITE EFFECTS ESTIMATION?

Transcription:

UTLZATON OF SESMC AND NFRASOUND SGNALS FOR CHARACTERZNG MNNG EXPLOSONS Brian Stump, Chris Hayward, Claus Hetzer and Rong-Mao Zhou Southern Methodist University Baylor University Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency Contract No. DSWA-98-C-76 ABSTRACT This empirical study is designed to quantify mining explosions as sources of seismic and infrasound signals. The study focuses on the Western US, where a variety of different types of mining operations exist, ranging from surface coal cast blasting to hard rock fragmentation blasting in porphyry copper mines. The study is extended to the taconite mines of the Mesabi Range of Minnesota. Newly installed instrumentation, including in-mine equipment for ground truth as well as regional seismo-acoustic deployments to complement existing resources in the region, is a key component of the study. n-mine monitoring is ongoing at the Morenci Mine in Arizona and the Tyrone Mine in New Mexico. The seismo-acoustic station at Ft. Hancock, Texas, and the infrasound upgrade to Tucson, Arizona, and WUAZ will also be illustrated. Data from this study have been used to address coupling and source characterization issues for both seismic and infrasound signals. The seismic coupling of large-scale cast blasts in Wyoming, copper fragmentation blasts in Arizona and New Mexico, and taconite fragmentation blasts in Minnesota are compared. For all these event types, there is no relation between total explosive yields and peak amplitude either in the mine or at regional distances. A series of contained, single-fired explosions of varying yield was conducted in the coal mine. At regional distances these events, in contrast, show a definitive magnitude-yield relation that follows the relationship for nuclear explosions. These data and an extensive modeling exercise suggest that the complete characterization of the delay firing process, including a spall contribution, can explain the regional observations. Acoustic data from within the mine indicate that a relation exists between total explosive weight and peak acoustic amplitudes. At regional distances, under optimum wind conditions, approximately 5% of Morenci Mine shots are observed out to 5 km. The shots that are observed are among those with the largest total explosive yield conducted at this mine. The acoustic data from within the mine can be used in developing ground truth. Unlike coal cast or taconite blasts, Morenci Copper Mine often shoots several explosive patterns within a short time interval (less than 5 s). The in-mine acoustic data can be used as ground truth to identify the occurrence of those complex explosive events and contribute to the interpretation of the accompanying regional signals. KEY WORDS: Seismo-acoustic, mining, discrimination, infrasound OBJECTVE This study focuses on seismic and infrasound signals from the following three types of mining operations: Coal overburden casting (Black Thunder, WY) where explosions are designed to remove overburden to expose coal; Rock fragmentation for copper recovery (Morenci, AZ) where moderate sized explosions are designed to break the rock for further processing; and Rock fragmentation in hard rock for iron recovery (Minntac, MN) where large-scale explosions are used to pulverize the taconite for further processing. 55 68

Each mine has distinctive blasting practices that are reflected in regional seismic and infrasound signals that are illustrated in this paper. This paper reports work in four areas:. Quantification of coupling of energy from mining explosions into regional seismic waves;. Development and constraint of physical models of mining explosions that are applicable to regional seismic signals;. Quantification of coupling of energy from mining explosions into infrasound signals; and 4. Characterization of seismic and infrasound signals from a number of unusual sources. Data from the three types of mining explosions listed earlier were used in developing these four work areas. RESEARCH ACCOMPLSHED Seismic Coupling n all three types of mining operations, peak amplitude of regional seismic signals is independent of the total explosive weight (Figure coal cast blasts, Figure taconite (iron) fragmentation, and Figure, right, copper fragmentation blasts). n-mine peak amplitudes are also independent of total explosive weight (Figure, left). A series of contained, single-fired explosion experiments with total explosive weights from 5, to 5, lbs. was conducted in the coal mine to further investigate coupling. Regional phase amplitudes of P n, P g and L g increase with a power law relation to total explosive weight (Figure, ~W b ). PDAR Pg Peak Amplit ude Coal Shots Single-fired Cast Shots Charge Weight (lbs) Figure : Peak P g amplitudes observed at array element of PDAR (6-km range) from contained singlefired explosions, delay-fired cast blasts and delay-fired coal shots 55 69

Figure : Peak P and R g amplitudes observed at EYMN (Ely, Minnesota) from taconite fragmentation explosions approximately km to the southwest of the station. N-MNE SESMC AMPLTUDES TUC SESMC AMPLTUDES 6 Peak Velocity (mm/s) 8 4 Hz Wideband Peak Velocity (nm/s) Pg Lg Rg 4 6 Charge Wt (lb) Charge Wt (lb) Figure : Peak amplitudes of in-mine recordings at Morenci are compared to total amount of explosives used in copper fragmentation blasts (left). Peak P g, L g and R g amplitudes observed at the regional station TUC plotted against total amount of explosives used in the Morenci copper fragmentation explosions (right). The scaling parameters (the b in W b) determined for these chemical explosions were.84 (.4) for P n,.84 (.9) for P g, and.9 (.8) for L g. These b values are in close agreement with the scaling relations of Vergino and Mensing (98) for P n waves from nuclear explosions in Nevada. This comparison of contained, single-fired explosions with standard mining explosions suggests that delay-firing, casting and fragmentation are responsible for the independence of peak regional and close-in amplitudes and total amount of explosives. Seismic Modeling Following Anandakrishnan et al (997) and Yang s (998) implementation in MATLAB, an equivalent elastic source model for the mining explosion was used to develop regional synthetic seismograms. The source model components shown in Figure 4 include: (a) explosion; (b) vertical spall; and (c) horizontal spall. The purpose of modeling was to investigate why peak regional amplitudes are insensitive to total explosive weight in delayfired explosions (Figures -) and how mid-frequency surface waves (- s) are generated from large-scale cast blasting. 55 7

a) Explosion Source Mueller-Murphy model b) Vertical Spall Opening of horizontal crack Unloading Slapdown Pit Depth c) Horizontal Spall Opening of vertical crack Horizontal slapdown in pit Figure 4: The three components of the equivalent mining explosion source model are represented pictorially. They consist of (a) the directly coupled energy from the contained explosion modeled as a Mueller- Murphy source function, (b) vertical spall due to the tensile failure of near-surface materials and (c) horizontal spall accompanying cast blasting when overburden is cast horizontally into a pit. n addition to the three-source components, the temporal and spatial finiteness of the explosive array is included in the model. Collaboration with the three mines used in the study provided the necessary information to model the source and generate synthetic seismograms. Hetzer () investigated the effect of delay firing at the Taconite Mine in Minnesota (Minntac). The mine provided shot details that could be incorporated into the source model (Figure 4). Hetzer set total spall mass, one of the important parameters in the model, as equal to the mine s report of total mass of rock blasted. This same technique was applied to large-scale coal cast blasts in Wyoming. Figure 5 plots the average spall mass per hole versus the average charge weight per hole for the Minntac data (open triangles) and the single cast blast data point. Spall scaling relations developed for nuclear explosions (Viecelli, 97; and Sobel, 978) are included in the figure for comparison. The Minntac data relation falls between the Sobel and Viecelli scaling models and is consistent with the coal cast data (red star). This empirical spall scaling relation was used in the mining explosion source model. SPALL CONTRBUTONS TO MNNG EXPLOSONS Black Thunder Cast Blast Figure 5: Spall mass (per hole) for the taconite hard rock explosions (open diamonds) and a single coal cast blast (star) were estimated from blasting logs. These empirical estimates from mining explosions are compared to the Viecelli and Sobel spall mass scaling relations developed for underground nuclear explosions. 55 7

Near-regional observations from the Minntac fragmentation blasts were made at EYMN approximately km to the NE of Minntac near Ely, Minnesota. These observations provide the basis for the empirical and modeling studies of Hetzer () and are summarized here. The shots ranged from 6, lbs to,5, lbs total explosive weight. Peak body (P g ) and surface wave (R g ) amplitudes showed little relation to total explosive weight (yield) as shown in Figure. The previously described source model and a regional propagation model were used to produce synthetics for the Minntac taconite fragmentation blasts. The models replicate the independence of regional signal peak amplitudes to total yield and replicate the order of magnitude scatter in amplitudes for a given yield. The modeling suggests that the average individual charge weight in the explosive array may control the absolute amplitudes of the regional phases. The observed body wave peak amplitudes in the -4 Hz band are plotted against average charge weight per hole in Figure 6 (solid symbols) and indicate a slight increase in peak amplitude with increasing single hole yield. For nine of the shots in the observational data set peak amplitudes on synthetic seismograms were compared with observations. The model amplitudes (open circles) are compared to the observations in the -4 Hz band in Figure 6 and replicate the increase in peak amplitude with increasing charge weight per hole. The synthetics also replicate the scatter in the peak amplitude values for any given average charge weight. REGONAL SYNTHETC AMPLTUDES COMPARED TO DATA - body waves, -4 Hz Amplitude (nm/s) Observation Synthetic 4 6 ndividual Charge Size (lbs) Figure 6: The mining explosion source model (Figure 4) was used to produce synthetics for a distance and crustal velocity model appropriate for EYMN. Synthetics were produced for a number of mining explosions of different average charge weight per borehole. Peak amplitudes of the synthetics are compared to the observations from the same explosions. A second modeling exercise was completed for the large-scale cast blast associated with the coal mines in Wyoming. Peak P g, P n and L g amplitudes from these blasts show little relation to total explosive yield as well (Figure ). These large, one to eight million lbs, explosions use many boreholes and as a result have long time durations. They are designed to cast the overburden and so material is moved horizontally and then drops vertically into a pit. As demonstrated in Figure 7 (left), these events generate significant regional surface waves in the to s band. From the surface wave dispersion analysis, a regional velocity model was developed and combined with the above mining source model to produce the synthetic regional surface waves (Figure 7, right). This study suggests that a long duration source in combination with a large-scale casting operation can generate the mid-period surface waves observed with this coal mine. 554 7

Synthetic (Red) and Observed (Blue) Fundamental Rayleigh Waves Regional Surface Waves from Cast Blasting CUST KRET SHNR CUST.5.5.5 ' ' LBOH ' after shot.5 5 5.5 4 6 8.5 5 5 Time (sec) LBOH MNTA PD MNTA.5.5.5 SHNR.5.5.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Time (sec) Figure 7: The mining explosion source model was also used to compute synthetics for the large-scale cast blasts. The focus in this modeling exercise is on the long period surface waves. nfrasound Coupling nfrasound signals have been reported to accompany mining explosions and may provide a source diagnostic (Sorrells et al, 997; Hsu and Stump, 997). Critical analysis of infrasound observations requires associated regional seismic observations and source information (such as blasting practices or designs). Coupling issues must be assessed, as well as models related to atmospheric propagation and source physics. Ground truth from the Morenci and Minntac mines provides source constraints. Preliminary results from Minntac (Figure 8 and Table ) and Morenci (Figures 9 and ) are illustrated below. Operations at both mines regularly generate seismic and infrasound signals. Recorded infrasound data from Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba, were examined for Minntac-originated infrasound signals during August and November. Four explosions were chosen for each time period. For detected signals, back azimuth estimates were within 5 degrees of the actual (Table ). Signals included significant energy from / to several Hz (Figure 8). All explosions over 5, lbs generated detectable infrasound. The effects of seasonal winds on the infrasound propagation have not been taken into account. MNNTAC GROUND TRUTH - REGONAL NFRASOUND, S 5 Aug 66, lbs SM/BDF - SM/BDF - SM4/BDF - :4: :6: :8: :: Time (hr:min:sec) Figure 8: Example infrasound arrivals observed at S-, Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba, from a hard rock fragmentation blast at Minntac. Back azimuth estimates from these data were within 5 degrees of the ground truth location. 555 7

Evnt7/ Evnt7/4 P Pn PPn Rg Rg :59:5 :55 :: :5 Time (hr:min:sec) - -.79 -.99 - -.8 Sx (sec/km) MNNTAC GROUND TRUTH - REGONAL NFRASOUND DETECTONS AT MS Date Yield (lbs) Detection 7 Aug 545,9 Yes Aug 55, Yes 5 Aug 66, Yes Aug 5, Yes 4 Nov 45, No 5 Nov 8, No Nov 75, No 8 Nov 8, Yes Table : Ground truth data from two one-week time periods were used to investigate the detection of infrasound signals at S. Five out of eight of the blasts were detected. Regional infrasound signals from 7 of 5 ground truth events at Morenci in February were observed at the Los Alamos infrasound array (Figure 9). Every observed explosion was over, lbs although not every large explosion was observed (Figure ). The dominant energy in the infrasound signal was in the - to -Hz band. Back azimuth estimates using f-k analysis were within 5 degrees of the ground truth. REGONAL NFRASOUND Los Alamos March 8-85,# Morenci... DL/sd.9..6.. DL/sd..6.4.9. DL/sd...4.6 DL4/sd. 4 ::4 :: : :4 Time (hr:min:sec) N-MNE GROUND TRUTH Morenci 8 March (Event 7) Seismic Acoustic 8N 7N 6N 5N 4N N N N MORENC GROUND TRUTH - REGONAL NFRASOUND BACKAZMUTH W DLAR 8 March 85, lbs nfrasound Backazimuth: 8 Ground Truth Backazimuth: W Sy (sec/km) Figure 9: Mining explosions from the hard rock copper mines in southeastern Arizona generate infrasound signals as exemplified by the records from DLAR in Los Alamos (left). Ground truth for this event was provided by close-in seismic and acoustic records of the blast (left, inset). Frequencywavenumber estimates were used to make the backazimuth estimate shown to the right. MORENC GROUND TRUTH,, Events Observed at LSAR Explosive Weight (lbs),, Figure : A number of the ground truth mining explosions from the copper fragmentation blasts in SE Arizona were observed at Los Alamos. Detected events were among the largest of the blasts. 556 74

Unusual Events Close-in observations provide source constraints that can be used to interpret regional seismic and infrasound signals. An example of how in-mine monitoring can illuminate unusual blasting practices is provided by data recorded on a seismo-acoustic system that is deployed in the Morenci Mine. A three-component broadband seismometer and three acoustic gauges in a tripartite configuration have been installed in the center of the mine. The combined seismic and acoustic data set provides a quantification of daily blasting in the mine with little or no impact on the mining operation. Analysis of this in-mine data set has illustrated that it is not uncommon for the blaster at this mine to detonate two or more explosive patterns within a few seconds. Such a blasting practice can produce complicated regional signals. n-mine seismic and acoustic records (top six waveforms) from two closely spaced patterns and the resulting complex regional seismograms observed at TXAR are reproduced in Figure. 4 JAN MORENC FRAG SHOTS AS RECORDED AT MORENC AND TXAR bz MORENC DATA bn be sd sd sd TX/sz TX/sz TX/sz TXAR DATA TX4/sz TX6/sz TX7/sz TX8/sz TX9/sz TX/sz :: :: :4: Time (hr:min:sec) Figure : Seismic and acoustic instrumentation from within the cooper mine was used for ground truth. The upper six traces represent the three seismic and three acoustic gauges deployed in the mine. The bottom nine traces are the array elements of TXAR. The close-in seismic and acoustic signals document two mining explosions detonated over a short time period providing a complex regional seismogram. nfrasound signals were recorded at the seismo-acoustic station outside of El Paso, Texas (Ft. Hancock) from the explosion and subsequent burning of a gas pipeline in New Mexico. Data from all three acoustic and one seismic sensor in the array are displayed in ten-minute segments (Figure ). As documented by the data, the pipeline burned for over 4 minutes. Details of the infrasound signal are compared to near-source seismograms (Figure ) illustrating that the complex nature of the explosion is reflected in the infrasound and seismic data. The gas pipeline explosion produced no regional seismic signals at the TXAR (Lajitas, TX) regional seismic array. 557 75

Natural Gas Explosion and Burn in New Mexico 9 August 8 km NE of site T. Wallace No Seismic at TXAR Figure : nfrasound (channels,, ) and seismic data (channel 4) from a seismo-acoustic station installed outside El Paso, Texas (Ft. Hancock). Each horizontal section represents minutes of data. This seismo-acoustic signal that extends for over minutes represents the explosion and burning of a natural gas line in New Mexico (photo: Terry Wallace, University of Arizona). Natural Gas Explosion and Burn in New Mexico T. Wallace 558 76