Comparison protocol EURAMET project

Similar documents
Euramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)

Centre for Metrology and Accreditation, MIKES

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

A bilateral comparison of a 1 kg platinum standard

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688

COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

High pressure comparison among seven European national laboratories

Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

ANNEXE 8. Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

Appendix B1. Reports of SMU

Report on Key Comparison COOMET.AUV.A-K5: Pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones in the frequency range 2 Hz to 10 khz

Metrology Principles for Earth Observation: the NMI view. Emma Woolliams 17 th October 2017

METHODS TO CONFIRM THE MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY OF THE FORCE STANDARD MACHINES AFTER REINSTALLATION

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

WGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty

COMPARISON OF HUMIDITY MEASUREMENTS USING A DEW POINT METER AS A TRANSFER STANDARD APMP-IC-1-97 REPORT

Version 4.0 (09/2017) Version 3.0 (02/2015) Version 2.0 (03/2011) Version 1.0 (07/2007) EURAMET e.v. Bundesallee 100 D Braunschweig Germany

Comparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576

Interamerican Metrology System (SIM) Regional Metrology Organization (RMO) Capacitance Comparison, Final Report

RECENT ILC ACTIVITY IN ROMANIAN MASS MEASUREMENTS

Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices

REPORT issued by an Accredited Testing Laboratory

Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators

Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum

Comparison of primary standards for liquid micro flow rates

EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Indicators and Simulators by Electrical Simulation and Measurement

Euramet EM-S40. Bilateral Comparison KIM-LIPI / LNE. Final Report

POWER QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE. Version 4 October Power-Quality-Oct-2009-Version-4.doc Page 1 / 12

CALIBRATION REPORT FOR THERMOHYDROMETER

Supplementary Comparison EUROMET.EM-S23 EURAMET PROJECT No 815 FINAL REPORT

FINAL REPORT ON THE KEY COMPARISON EUROMET.AUV.A-K3

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu

Low gauge pressure comparisons between MIKES, Metrosert and FORCE Technology

PC TOOL FOR DATA ANALYSIS IN CALIBRATION OF SPECIAL WEIGHTS

MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS AT MIKES

Project 887 Force Uncertainty Guide. Andy Knott, NPL EUROMET TC-M Lensbury, Teddington, United Kingdom 1 March 2007

M [scale units/s] of the system

EURAMET Project no Inter-comparison of a 1000 L proving tank

EA-10/14. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices. Publication Reference PURPOSE

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Ajchara Charoensook, Chaiwat Jassadajin. National Institute of Metrology Thailand. Henry Chen, Brian Ricketts and Leigh Johnson

Portuguese Institute for Quality. Contents

A comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass standards among eighteen European NMIs

Final Report August 2010

Final Report on the Torque Key Comparison CCM.T-K2 Measurand Torque: 0 kn m, 10 kn m, 20 kn m Dirk Röske 1), Koji Ogushi 2)

Final Report on the EURAMET.PR-K1.a-2009 Comparison of Spectral Irradiance 250 nm nm

EUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

AFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.

Euramet project 1075 Bilateral comparison

Participants in the Proficiency Test THM 02/2016

High pressure comparisons between seven European National Laboratories

GULF ASSOCIATION FOR METROLOGY. Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Mechanical Comparison Method GULFMET.L-S1

DEVELOPMENT OF MEASUREMENT STANDARD FOR DYNAMIC PRESSURE AT MIKES

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition

Final Report on Comparison of Hydraulic Pressure Balance Effective Area Determination in the Range up to 80 MPa

Document No: TR 12 Issue No: 1

Maha Ireland Ltd. 629 Jordanstown Avenue, Greenogue Business Park, Rathcoole, Co. Dublin. Calibration Laboratory Registration number: 287C

PROTOCOL OF MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIM NMIs

Inter-laboratory Comparison of Impedance-Type Hygrometer in the Range from 10 % to 95 % at 5 C to 55 C

Using the Budget Features in Quicken 2008

BILATERAL COMPARISON REPORT LNE KIM-LIPI

H1: Metrological support. Milena Horvat, Polona Vreča, Tea Zuliani, Radojko Jaćimović, Radmila Milačič

INTERLABORATORY MASS COMPARISON BETWEEN LABORATORIES BELONGING TO SIM SUB-REGIONS COORDINATED BY CENAM (SIM.7.31a & SIM.7.31b)

R SANAS Page 1 of 7

Part 5: Total stations

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

Metallic materials Brinell hardness test. Part 2: Verification and calibration of testing machines

Guidelines on the Calibration of Automatic Instruments for Weighing Road Vehicles in Motion and Measuring Axle Loads AWICal WIM Guide May 2018

J3/2006. Mass Comparison: 610 g laboratory balance. Kari Riski Leena Stenlund Mittatekniikan keskus

National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR LABORATORY ACCREDITATION. Peter B. Crisp. Fluke Precision Measurement Ltd, 52 Hurricane Way, Norwich, UK

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

SAMM POLICY 5 (SP5) POLICY ON MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAMM TESTING LABORATORIES Issue 2, 28 February 2007 (Amd. 1, 11 August 2014)

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

PROFITstar eseries Training

Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005

473 Dew Point Hygrometer

APMP supplementary comparison of absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation

Force Key Comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2. (50 kn and 100 kn) EURAMET Project No 518. Final Report. 14 July Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom

EA-10/13. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators. Publication Reference PURPOSE

Comparison Euramet 898

Introduction to the evaluation of uncertainty

Calibration of Surface Contamination Monitors. UKAS Accredited Organisations Comparison. Final Report

Metallic materials Brinell hardness test. Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks

Determination of sound absorption coefficient in impedance tubes according to ISO (2 appendices)

ASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME

Calibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results. Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands

Mason Technology Ltd

EUROMET Comparison of a 10 mh Inductance Standard at 1 khz EUROMET.EM-K3. Final Report

WeatherHawk Weather Station Protocol

In Association With. Introduces. TPT Contractor

INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON BETWEEN TUBITAK-UME TURKEY AND INM ROMANIA IN THE FIELD OF FORCE MEASUREMENTS

Transcription:

Comparison protocol EURAMET project Bilateral three-phase AC and energy comparison at frequency 1. Introduction This bilateral comparison was triggered by MIKES need to get support for their planned extension electrical and energy CMC claims to three phase calibrations. SP will provide a travelling standard, which will be calibrated by both participants. 2. Travelling standard The travelling standard is a precision three-phase reference electricity meter. Manufacturer: ZERA Type: TPZ303 SP reference: 96-610-12 Figure 1. Transfer reference, TPZ303 3. Quantities The following quantities are relevant in the comparison: Table 1 - Relevant quantities Quantity Active Reactive Active energy Reactive energy Unit W VAr Ws VArh Page 1 of 7

4. Organization 4.1. Contacts at MIKES: Dr. Jari Hällström Centre for Metrology and accreditation Tekniikantie 1 02151 Espoo Finland E-mail: jari.hallstrom@mikes.fi Phone: +358 10 6054 441 Fax: +358 10 6054 498 Mr. Esa-Pekka Suomalainen Centre for Metrology and accreditation Tekniikantie 1 02151 Espoo Finland 4.2. Contacts at SP: Dr. Stefan Svensson SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden Department Electrical Metrology Brinellgatan 4, P.O. Box 857 SE-501 15. Boras SWEDEN E-mail: stefan.svensson@sp.se Phone: +46 10 516 54 15 4.3. Time schedule Estimated schedule is shown in Table 2. Table 2 - Estimated time schedule SP, Borås, Sweden March-May, 2010 MIKES, Espoo, Finland August-September, 2010 SP, Borås, Sweden October-November, 2010 4.4. Transportation Participants will be responsible for arranging transportation to the next participant. Transportation is each laboratory s own responsibility and cost. MIKES will inform SP by email when the transfer reference has arrived, and again when it will be sent back. The transfer standard is packed in a metallic container with dimensions: height x width x depth [cm] = 50 x 50 x 50 cm. The weight of the standards with case is about 35 Kg. The container need not be transported personally. Page 2 of 7

4.5. Failure of the travelling standard In case of failure of the traveling standard it will be sent back to SP. After the problem has been solved the comparison will start again. 4.6. Financial aspects, insurance Each participating laboratory covers the costs of its measurements, transportation and possible customs charges as well as of any damage that may have occurred within its country. The pilot laboratory covers overall costs for the organization of the comparison. 5. Measurement instructions 5.1. Conditioning of the transfer standard The transfer standard must be kept in the laboratory before the measurements for at least 2 hours so that it reaches stable temperature. It is recommended to keep the ambient temperature on the value 23 C 2 C. The data of the ambient conditions during the measurements must be given in the calibration certificate. 5.2. Power comparison On the TPZ303 display click on: Funktioner > Ärvärden to select the connection and measurement range; Mätartt > 4L-Aktiv or 4L-Reaktiv U-Omr > 240, 120, or 60 I-Omr > 10,5,2,1,500m,200m,100m,50m,20m,10m or 5m To start the measurement first click on: Funktioner > Kontrollmätning (U,I,P), and then to get readings from the TPZ303 use the software TPZ303 Reader. 1) Use an RS232 cable to connect the COM port 1on the TPZ303 to the COM port on your computer. 2) Start the program TPZ303 Reader 3) In the program, select which of your computer s COM ports you are using. 4) Choose an appropriate measuring time. (5000 ms) 5) Click on the button to start a measurement. To copy the average values to Excel for instance, triple-click in the Average values text field to select the text. Then CTRL+C to copy and then, in Excel, CTRL+V to paste. Page 3 of 7

5.3. Energy comparison On the TPZ303 display go to Funktioner > Ärvärden to select the connection and measurement range Mätartt > 4L-Aktiv or 4L-Reaktiv U-Omr > 240, 120, or 60 I-Omr > 10,5,2,1,500m,200m,100m,50m,20m,10m or 5m Use the frequents output fout = 60000 i/s Calculate the right pulse constant, i/kwh, by using the formula: 6. Uncertainty of measurement All participants should provide their results with the associated uncertainty of measurement and a complete uncertainty budget. The uncertainty of the measurement must be estimated according to the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). 7. Measurement report Both participants will issue standard calibration certificate(s). SP will perform calibration before and after the travelling standard visits MIKES to control possible drift of the transfer reference. A short description of the measuring setup will be given as an annex. The calibration certificates should be kept by the issuing laboratory until all three certificates have been signed. 8. Report of the comparison After completion of all measurements the coordinator (MIKES) will prepare a first draft report and send it to SP for comments. Page 4 of 7

Annex 1 Table A-1 - Comparison points Positive active energy, Y-connected, 4L-Active TPZ Range Test point - Current Power 1-3- voltage factor L1 U I cos( ) 60 V 1 A 60 V 1 A 1,00 X 120 V 5 A 120 V 5 A 1,00 X 240 V 5 A 240 V 5 A 1,00 X Positive reactive energy, Y-connected, 4L-Reactive TPZ Range Test point Nominal TPZ readings voltage current Power factor Reactive Active 1- L1 3- U I sin( ) Q [VAr] P [W] 60 V 1 A 60 V 1 A 0,50 ind 450-790 X 0,50 cap 450 790 X 120 V 5 A 120 V 5 A 0,50 ind 900-1570 X 0,50 cap 900 1570 X 1,00 1800 0 X 240 V 5 A 240 V 5 A 0,50 ind 1800-3100 X 0,50 cap 1800 3100 X Page 5 of 7

Positive active, Y-connected, 4L-Active TPZ Range Test point - Current Power 1-3- voltage factor L1 U I cos( ) 60 V 0,05 A 60 V 0,05 A 1,00 X 60 V 1 A 60 V 1 A 1,00 X X 0,50 ind X 0,25 ind X 0,50 cap X 0,25 cap X X 120 V 0,005 A 120 V 0,005 A 1,00 X X 0,01 A 0,01 A X 0,02 A 0,02 A X 0,05 A 0,05 A X 0,1 A 0,1 A X 0,2 A 0,2 A X 0,5 A 0,5 A X 1 A 1 A X X 2 A 2 A X 120 V 5 A 120 V 5 A 1,00 X X 0,50 ind X 0,25 ind X 0,50 cap X 0,25 cap X 0 ind X 0 cap X 120 V 10 A 120 V 10 A 1,00 X X 240 V 0,05 A 240 V 0,05 A 1,00 X 240 V 5 A 240 V 5 A 1,00 X X 0,50 ind X 0,25 ind X 0,50 cap X 0,25 cap X X 240 V 10 A 240 V 10 A 1,00 X Page 6 of 7

Positive reactive, Y-connected, 4L-Reactive TPZ Range Test point Nominal TPZ readings voltage current Power factor Reactive Active 1-phase L1 3- U I sin( ) Q [VAr] P [W] 60 V 1 A 60 V 1 A 0,50 ind 450-790 X 0,87 ind 790-450 X 1,00 900 0 X 0,50 cap 450 790 X 0,87 cap 790 450 X 120 V 5 A 120 V 5 A 0,50 ind 900-1570 X 0,87 ind 1570-900 X 1,00 1800 0 X 0,50 cap 900 1570 X 0,87 cap 1570 900 X 240 V 5 A 240 V 5 A 0,50 ind 1800-3100 X 0,87 ind 3100-1800 X 1,00 3600 0 X 0,50 cap 1800 3100 X 0,87 cap 3100 1800 X Page 7 of 7