Quaternionic Quantum Particles SERGIO GIARDINO Institute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo (Unifes) Avenida Cesare G. M. Lattes 101, 147-014 São José dos Camos, SP, Brazil arxiv:1704.06848v1 [quant-h] Ar 017 Solutions of quaternionic quantum mechanics (QQM) are difficult to gras, even in simle hysical situations. In this article, we rovide simle and understandable free article quaternionic solutions, that can be easily comared to comlex quantum mechanics (CQM). As an alication, we study the scattering of quaternionic articles through a scalar ste otential. We also rovide a general solution method for the quaternionic Schrödinger equation, which can be alied to more sohisticated and hysically interesting models. PACS numbers: Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. TIME-DEPENDENT WAVE EQUATIONS III. TIME-INDEPENDENT WAVE EQUATIONS 3 IV. THE QUATERNIONIC PARTICLE SOLUTIONS 4 A. Θ = 0 5 B. Θ = 0 5 V. THE FREE QUATERNIONIC PARTICLE 5 VI. THE STEP POTENTIAL 6 VII. CONCLUSION 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 9 References 9 I. INTRODUCTION Quaternionic quantum mechanics (QQM) was conceived by considering comlex quantum mechanics (CQM) as a model. However, an imortant difference between these theories concerns the hermiticity of oerators: hermitian oerators in CQM and anti-hermitian oerators in QQM [1]. At first glance, hermiticity seems to be a major difference between the theories, but it is not so. Anti-hermiticity cannot be considered a true difference between QQM and CQM because the hermitian Schrödinger equation of CQM turns into an equation of anti-hermitian oerators simly by multilying of the whole equation by the comlex unit i, and most of the comlex hermitian oerators are converted to anti-hermitian oerators using this rocedure. In terms of henomenology, both theories calculate exectation values of their oerators using identical formulas. The anti-hermitian formulation of QQM ermits the conservation of the robability density current [1], and this is a ositive oint. However, there are drawbacs concerning the anti-hermitian QQM formulation, and the breadown of Ehrenfest s theorem in QQM is a serious roblem from a hysical standoint [1 3]. Another disadvantage of the anti-hermitian QQM is the lac of a set of simle solutions. In CQM, sohisticated and hysically interesting models are built using a set of simle solutions, which rovide the basic understanding of the theory as well. Of course, there are solutions to QQM, and we can quote some of them by way of examle [4 16], but they do not have the simlicity that allows them to be comared to either CQM or classical solutions. Electronic address: 1@ubi.t
II TIME-DEPENDENT WAVE EQUATIONS More recently, an alternative QQM formulation [17] has emerged from a quaternionic version of the Aharonov- Bohm (AB) effect [18]. The quaternionic AB-effect has an imortant difference comared to the usual quantum theories: the momentum oerator, and consequently the Hamiltonian oerator, do not have a defined hermiticity. A consistent theory has been obtained by redefining the exectation value and the robability current, so that the robability current is conserved in this quaternionic AB-solution. This solution has motivated the develoment of a quaternionic quantum theory of non-anti-hermitian oerators [17], and this theory has the imortant advantage of a well-defined classical limit; therefore, the Ehrenfest theorem is valid in this framewor. For an arbitrary oerator O and an arbitrary quaternionic wave function Ψ, the exectation value is defined in the non-anti-hermitian theory to be O = 1 dx 3[ Ψ OΨ+ ( Ψ OΨ ) ], (1) where the asteris denotes the conjugate comlex. This exectation value recovers the usual definition when wave functions are comlex and the oerators are hermitian, consequently generalizing it. In this article, we further develo this non-anti hermitian theory roviding a method for solving the quaternionic Schrödinger equation and obtaining its simlest examle: the free article. This solution has many similarities with the comlex wave function, but it also has major differences, mainly the contribution of the ure quaternionic comonents of wave function to the robability current. The quaternionic solutions have constraints that are unnown in the comlex case, and thus, non trivial solutions are harder to find. On the other hand, quaternionic solutions resent novel features that are unnown in CQM, lie a novel time-deendent solution and the ossibility of controlling the direction of roagation through the relative amlitude of the comlex and ure quaternionic comonents of the wave function. We have also studied the scattering of quaternionic articles through a scalar ste otential, and the quaternionic articles have higher energies, when comared to the comlex case. We stress that the solutions resented herein are simle, and it may be immediately verified that they satisfy the quaternionic Schrödinger equation. Anti-hermitian quaternionic solutions [4 16] are much more comlicated and subtle, which reduces their interest and otential alicability. The develoed general method for finding quaternionic solutions is harder when comared to the usual methods for solving the Schrödinger equation, but the results obtained are illuminating, and we therefore exect it will insire further research in this area. This article is organized as follows: in Sections II and III we solve the quaternionic Schrödinger equation using a novel method where a quaternionic solution is obtained from a reviously nown comlex solution. In Section IV we aly the solution method to find the quaternionic free article, and a few hysical asects of this solution are discussed in Section V. Section VI describes the scattering of the quaternionic free article through a scalar ste otential, while section VII rounds off the article with our conclusions and future ersectives. II. TIME-DEPENDENT WAVE EQUATIONS In this article, we adot the wave equation h Ψ t i = HΨ, () where both the Hamiltonian oerator H and the wave function Ψ are quaternionic. There is a second ossibility for (), which laces the comlex unit i on the left hand side of (), so that h Ψi hi Ψ, where Ψ reresents the time derivative of Ψ. We will discuss this ossibility in an ucoming article, where it can be more conveniently exlored. As in the comlex case, we searate the variables of the wave function, so that Ψ(x, t) = Φ(x)Λ(t). (3) Φ and Λ are quaternionic functions, and we additionally imose Λ as an unitary quaternion with Λ = cos Ξ e ix + sin Ξ e iυ j, so that ΛΛ = 1, (4) where Λ is the quaternionic conjugate. Of course, Ξ, X and Υ are time-deendent real functions and j is the anticommuting quaternionic comlex unit, which obeys ij = ji and j = 1. We adot the symlectic notation for quaternionic numbers (H), where q H is written q = z+ζj with z, ζ C. (5)
III TIME-INDEPENDENT WAVE EQUATIONS Λ is already written in symlectic notation (4), and Φ will be exressed in the same terms. An unitary quaternion is the natural generalization of the comlex exonential function that is the time-deendent art of a comlex wave function, and both functions have oscillatory roerties that are desirable in quantum theories. Real exonentials are not deloyed in CQM, nor will they be considered here, either. In order to searate the time variable in the wave function, we use (3) and (4) in the wave equation (), and we further imose ΛiΛ = κ. (6) The dot denotes a time derivative, and κ = κ 0 + κ 1 j is a quaternionic searation constant with κ 0 and κ 1 comlex. Thus, from (6) we get i Ξ sin Ξ Ẋ cos Ξ+ Υ sin Ξ i [ sin Ξ e i(x+υ)] j = κ. (7) We searate it into two arts according to the deendence on the comlex unit j, and the ure quaternionic art gives sin Ξ e i(x+υ) = κ 1 t+c. (8) where C is an integration constant. The sine is finite, and consequently κ 1 = 0. The simlest solution is thus Λ(t) = Λ 0 ex [ i Ēh ] t, (9) where E is the energy and Λ 0 is an unitary quaternionic constant. (9) is simly the CQM time-deendent solution with a constant quaternionic hase. A more general solution is obtained for Ξ = 0 and Ẋ = Υ = Ē h, (10) so that Λ(t) = Λ 0 {cos Ξ ex [ i Ēh ] [ ( )] } E t + sin Ξ ex i h t+τ 0 j, ΛiΛ = Ē h, (11) and τ 0 is a real constant. (11) is an amazingly simle quaternionic result, which recovers the comlex time-deendent quantum solution when Λ 0 is comlex and Ξ = 0, and thus generalizes the comlex case. In the next section, we roceed accordingly to find time-indeendent quantum quaternionic solutions that are simle and new lie (11). III. TIME-INDEPENDENT WAVE EQUATIONS From the revious section, the time-indeendent Schrödinger equation is HΦ = E Φ, (1) and we notice that the hamiltonian oerator H is not suosed to be either hermitian or anti-hermitian, only the energye is suosed to be real. We roose the satial wave function Φ = φ λ, (13) where λ is a quaternionic function and φ is a time-indeendent comlex solution of Schrödinger equation with energy E, so that Hφ = Eφ. Using (1) and (13), we get φ λ+ φ λ = m h ( E E ) φλ. (14) We can mae further rogress decomosing the quaternionic function, such that λ = ρk, where λ = ρ, K = cos Θ e iγ + sin Θ e iω j, and KK = 1; (15) 3
IV THE QUATERNIONIC PARTICLE SOLUTIONS where ρ, Θ, Γ and Ω are real functions. We then turn (14) into [ ] 1 ( + ρ φ φ) ρ K+ ρφ (ρφ) K+ K = m ( ) E E K. (16) h Defining where K = e iγ + q e iω j and K = u e iγ + v e iω j, (17) = sin Θ Θ+i cos Θ Γ, q = cos Θ Θ+ i sin Θ Ω, u = cos Θ( Γ + Θ ) ( ) sin Θ Θ+ i cos Θ Γ sin Θ Γ Θ (18) v = sin Θ( Ω + Θ ) ( ) + cos Θ Θ+ i sin Θ Ω+ cos Θ Ω Θ, we can slit (16) into its comlex and quaternionic arts, resectively After defining, 1 ρ 1( + ρ φ φ) ρ+ ρφ (ρφ) cos Θ + u cos Θ = m ( ) E E h 1( + ρ φ φ) ρ+ ρφ (ρφ) q sin Θ + v sin Θ = m ( ) E E h ( + φ φ ) ρ = Z 0, ρφ (ρφ) cos Θ = Z 1 wherez 0, Z 1 andz are comlex functions, we searate (19-0) into real comonents, so that and R(Z 0 +Z 1 ) Γ Θ tan Θ Θ = m h ( E E ) (19) (0) ρφ (ρφ) q sin Θ = Z, (1) R(Z 0 +Z ) Ω Θ + cot Θ Θ = m ( ) E E h (3) ( ) I(Z 0 +Z 1 )+ tan Θ Θ Γ = 0 (4) ( ) I(Z 0 +Z )+ + cot Θ Θ Ω = 0 (5) where R(Z) and I(Z) are resectively the real and the imaginary comonents of a comlex Z. Thus, every timeindeendent comlex wave function φ that satisfies the Schrödinger equation with real energy E has a corresondent quaternionic time-indeendent wave function. When multilied by a quaternionic time-indeendent function λ = ρk, the comlex wave function generates the quaternionic wave function Φ = φλ, which satisfies (1-5) and the quaternionic wave equation (1). To the best of our nowledge, this is the simlest and most general method of finding non-relativistic quaternionic wave functions. In the following sections we will loo for the simlest quaternionic functions that satisfy these conditions and ascertain several hysical roerties. () IV. THE QUATERNIONIC PARTICLE SOLUTIONS The wave function of a comlex quantum article is reresented by a comlex exonential, and thus the amlitude of the wave function is constant. In analogy to the comlex case, we suose that the quaternionic radius ρ is constant, and therefore ρ = 0, (6) In this case, the quaternionic wave function is generated from φ through a quaternionic geometric hase. A comlete investigation of such a quaternionic Berry hase is interesting enough to be the subject of a searate article, which we will do at a latter date. For our uroses, we further simlify our roblem if φ Γ = 0, φ Ω = 0, φ Θ = 0, (7) and then two ossible simle solutions emerge. Let us see the first. 4
V THE FREE QUATERNIONIC PARTICLE A. Θ = 0 In this case, Γ = γ x+γ (0), Ω = ω x+ω (0), Θ = θ x+θ (0), (8) with γ, ω and θ constant real vectors and Γ (0), Ω (0) and Θ (0) real constants. We thus obtain several constraints involving the vector norms, and orthogonality constraints as well, γ = ω, γ + θ = m (E E), (9) h θ γ = 0, θ ω = 0, φ θ = 0, φ γ = 0, and φ ω = 0. (30) In the same fashion that φ is a linear combination of two comlex exonentials according to the sign of the exonent, the quaternionic solution has four ossibilities, and hence the most general wave function is [( ) ( ) Φ = φ(x) cos Θ e iγ + sin Θ e iω j Q 1 + cos Θ e iγ + sin Θ e iω j Q + ( ) ( ) ] + cos Θ e iγ + sin Θ e iω j Q 3 + cos Θ e iγ + sin Θ e iω j Q 4, (31) where Q 1, Q, Q 3 and Q 4 are arbitrary quaternionic constants. We can mae φ constant, so that E = 0, and thus obtain the simlest solution of the case, a truly quaternionic free article. However, we remember that every comlex wave function may generate this ind of quaternionic solution. Furthermore, we stress that (31) is very different from the comlex case. The function Θ enables the wave function with a novel oscillation, totally unnown in CQM. Let us choose and the vector constraints B. Θ = 0 Γ = γ x+γ (0), Ω = ω x+ω (0), (3) φ γ = 0, φ ω = 0, φ Θ = 0, Θ γ = 0 and Θ ω = 0. (33) The equations to be solved are Θ + ω sin Θ+ γ cos Θ = m ( h (E E) and Θ+ γ ω ) sin Θ cos Θ = 0. (34) If we aly the gradient oerator to the Θ equation, we obtain the Θ equation with a changed sign, and consequently Θ = 0, recovering the revious case. Thus there is no non-trivial solution to this situation. V. THE FREE QUATERNIONIC PARTICLE The comlex free article solution enables imortant quantum models to be develoed, such as the infinite well, the finite well, scattering henomena and wave acets. In the revious section, we saw that this comlex wave function has a quaternionic generalization. In this section, we will discuss this mathematical solution in hysical terms. Accordingly, we will mae use of the robability current defined in [17], namely and the quaternionic momentum ˆ is defined in [17] as j = 1 [ Φ ˆΦ+ ( Φ ˆΦ ) ], (35) m ˆ = h( i), so that ˆΦ = h Φi. (36) 5
VI THE STEP POTENTIAL Using (13) and (17), we get the robability current of the quaternionic wave function to be j = ρ cos Θ j 0 + h m ρ φ ( ) cos Θ Γ sin Θ Ω, (37) where j 0 is the CQM robability current. By way of examle, let us calculate the robability current of a quaternionic wave function (31) where Q 1 = 1 and Q = Q 3 = Q 4 = 0, and the comlex wave function is the free article φ(x) = A 1 e i x + A e i x, where = me h, (38) where A 1 and A are comlex constants. From (31) and (37), we get j = h m j satisfies the continuity equation [ ( cos Θ A 1 A ) + φ ( )] cos Θ Γ sin Θ Ω. (39) ρ + j = 0, (40) t and thus there is no gain and no loss of robability in the free article solution. As exected, the comlex result is recovered if Γ = 0 and Θ = 0. There is no robability flux along the Θ direction, and consequently no momentum is carried along this direction, however, the article is allowed to move along the Θ direction. Along the directions orthogonal to Θ, the Θ function is a simle arameter of the solution, and it may be made constant without affecting the robability flux and, of course, on the momentum exectation value. Another feature involves the contributions for the robability flux due to Γ and Ω. If these vectors are collinear and have a common ositive direction, Γ increases j and Ω attenuates the flux. This fact may be interreted in terms of anti-articles that move in the oosite direction of the article, and this interretation has been made for relativistic quaternionic solutions [1 14]. However, this may not necessarily be the case. Another interretation is that (cos Θ Γ sin Θ Ω) contributes the robability flux of a single article. The current attenuates and even inverts deending on the relation between the amlitudes of the comlex and quaternionic arts of the wave function. This interretation does not require the existence of anti-articles, and it is in agreement with the comlex case. Two simle examles illustrate the situation. Φ 1 = cos Θ e i x + sin Θ e i x j and Φ = e i x( cos Θ+ sin Θ j ), (41) where Θ is a real constant and is a real vector. The robability currents are j 1 = h m and j = h cos Θ. (4) m The intensity of j 1 is identical to the intensity of the robability current generated by the comlex article (38) when A = 0, and we interret Φ 1 as a single article wave function. On the other hand, Φ generates a robability flux whose intensity deends on Θ, and even j = 0 if Θ = π/4. Accordingly, we can understand j as a single article robability current, and Θ determines the intensity of the robability flux. Although there is neither robability current nor momentum along the Θ direction, the value of the angle affects the direction and the intensity of the flux, and thus Θ is in fact a relevant hysical variable whose recise meaning must be determined on a case-by-case basis. VI. THE STEP POTENTIAL The quaternionic solutions we examined in the revious section may be written as Φ = φk, (43) where φ is a comlex wave function and K is a unit quaternion, and can be understood as a comlex solution with a quaternionic hase. This ind of solution can hardly generate hysically novel solutions because geometric hases generate observable effects only in interaction rocesses. Conversely, we observed that the single articles (41) resent differences comared to the comlex cases, even without inter-article interactions. Let us go further to 6
VI THE STEP POTENTIAL observe whether quaternionic effects may haen to single article systems, lie the scattering of quaternionic free articles by the scalar ste otential V = { 0 for x < 0, region I V 0 for x 0, region II, (44) where V 0 is a real ositive constant and the otential V slits the three-dimensional sace into two arts bordered by the Oyz lane. We roose the wave function ] Φ I = cos Θ e i( x+γ x) + sin Θ e i( x+ω x) j+ R [cos Θ q e i( q x+γ q x) + sin Θ q e i(q x+ω q x) j [ ] Φ II = T cos Θ e i( x+γ x) + sin Θ e i( x+ω x) j (45) with R and T comlex constants and, q,, γ a and ω a real vectors for a =, q,. We also suose that Θ a are constants and adot that an arbitrary vector v slits into comonents according to v = v + v, (46) where v is the comonent of v that is arallel to and v is the comonent of v that is normal to. Schrödinger s equation ermit us to get where it has been used that + γ = q + γ q = m h E and + γ = m h (E V 0), (47) γ a = ω a for a =,, q. (48) There is a set of boundary conditions at the oint of incidence x 0 = (0, y 0, z 0 ), but we can set x 0 = (0, 0, 0) without loss of generality. Considering the continuity of the wave function, { cos Θ (0) Φ I (x 0 ) = Φ II (x 0 ) + R cos Θ (0) q = T cos Θ (0) sin Θ (0) + R sin Θ (0) q = T sin Θ (0) (49) Φ I (x 0) = Φ II (x 0) Considering, q and collinear vectors, we obtain We obtain the simlest solution imosing real coefficients R and Furthermore, (47) requires { cos Θ (0) Rq cos Θ (0) q = T cos Θ (0) sin Θ (0) + Rq sin Θ (0) q = T sin Θ (0). T = +q +q and R = +q. (51) (50) = q. (5) γ = γ q. (53) We notice that γa = 0 recovers the robability density of the comlex case, but the wave function is still quaternionic. A comlex limit is only recovered if Θ a = 0, and we conclude that the wave function (45) generalizes the comlex case because the hysical results of the comlex case are recovered within a limit, even though the wave function is still quaternionic. We can hyothesize that comlex solutions may have a quaternionic counterart with identical hysical redictions. Yet, the analysis of the quaternionic ste demands the boundary conditions along the direction { Φ γ I (0) = Φ II (0) cos Θ (0) + Rγq cos Θ (0) q = Tγ cos Θ (0) ω sin Θ(0) + Rωq sin Θ(0) q = Tω sin Θ(0). 7 (54)
VII CONCLUSION To finally solve the roblem, let us suose that the γ a vectors are collinear, and so are the ω a vectors. We stress that γa and ω a are not necessarily collinear, although they have identical magnitudes. We also remember that R and T satisfy the CQM relation q R = T. (55) Comaring (54) with (55), we obtain γ q cos Θ (0) q γ cos Θ (0) (56) ermits us say that = ω q sin Θ (0) q ω sin Θ (0) = 1 and γ cos Θ (0) γ cos Θ (0) = ω sin Θ (0) ω sin Θ (0) =. (56) and thus, sin Θ (0) = sin Θ (0) q = sin Θ (0). (57) = γ γ = 1 V 0 E. (58) The (58) relation, between the incoming and transmitted momenta, is equivalently obeyed in the comlex case, and thus the quaternionic article (45) is ossibly the simlest quaternionic generalization of the comlex scattering. The solution deends only on the arameters of the incident article: the energye, the transverse momentum γ and on the intensity of the scalar otential V 0 and Θ angle. We observe that all the comonents of robability j are collinear, but the flux is not necessarily normal to the Oxy lane. The direction of the incident robability flow is determined by Θ, γ and ω, while the only effect of V 0 is the intensity of the transmitted momentum. The otential does not change the direction of the transmitted and reflected articles. This means that the system does not behave lie a light beam, and consequently does not satisfy some version of the Snell law. This remar is imortant because this a behavior has been observed in anti-hermitian QQM [19], and the reasons for this difference must be investigated. VII. CONCLUSION In this article we resented a general method for finding quaternionic quantum solutions. The quaternionic timedeendet wave function generalizes the CQM result with a unitary quaternion, whereas starting oints of the timeindeendent solution are CQM-wave functions φ that generate quaternionic solutions when multilied to a quaternion function λ, and hence the quaternionic solutions are such that Φ = φλ. The solution method does not suose hermiticity for oerators, and thus the results are out of the main stream of QQM, which is mainly anti-hermitian. Our aroach, however, has the advantage of a well-behaved classical limit, something not accomlished within the anti-hermitian framewor. The method has been alied to obtain the simlest quantu solution: the free article. The quaternionic free article has a limit whose hysical roerties are identical to the comlex quantum free article. However, the wave function has novel oscillations, and this is evidence that our aroach must be considered as an alternative quaternionic generalization of quantum mechanics. The scattering of a quaternionic article through a scalar ste otential has also resented many similarities with the comlex case. The arameters of the quaternionic case may regulate the intensity and direction of the robability flow, something unobserved in the comlex case. The solution is very simle comared to the anti-hermitian quaternionic cases, for examle [9], and then we hoe that this simlicity will insire further research in the field. We can outline several ersectives for future research. Many mathematical questions that are currently studied in anti-hermitian QQM [0] can be addressed to the non-anti-hermitian formalisf used in the resent article. On another side, throughout the text we have observed that there is a second ossibility to the wave equation (3), where i is laced on the left hand side of Ψ, and also the study of quaternionic geometric hases, which have already been started with the quaternionic AB-effect [18], but that may deserve a more secific treatment. In rincile, every result of quantum mechanics is at ris of being revised using the non-anti-hermitian formalism, and therefore, the field of research is vast. We hoe that it can be thoroughly investigated in the future. 8
VII CONCLUSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sergio Giardino is grateful for the hositality at the Institute of Science and Technology of Unifes in São José dos Camos. [1] S. L. Adler. Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields. Oxford University Press (1995). [] S. L. Adler. Quaternionic quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys., 104:611, 1986. [3] S. L. Adler. Quaternionic quantum field theory. In: C. Teitelboim (Ed.), Quantum Mechanics of Fundamental Systems 1, Sringer (1988). [4] A. J. Davies; B. H. J. McKellar. Nonrelativistic quaternionic quantum mechanics in one dimension. Phys. Rev., A40:409 414, (1989). [5] A. J. Davies; B. H. J. McKellar. Observability of quaternionic quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev., A46:3671 3675, (1989). [6] S. De Leo; G. Ducati. Quaternionic differential oerators. J. Math. Phys, 4:36 65, (001). [7] S. De Leo; G. Ducati; C. Nishi. Quaternionic otentials in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. J. Phys, A35:5411 546, (00). [8] S. De Leo; G. Ducati. Quaternionic bound states. J. Phys, A35:3443 3454, (005). [9] S. De Leo; G. Ducati; T. Madureira. Analytic lane wave solutions for the quaternionic otential ste. J. Math. Phys, 47:08106 15, (006). [10] S. De Leo; G. Ducati. Quaternionic wave acets. J. Math. Phys, 48:05111 10, (007). [11] A. J. Davies. Quaternionic Dirac equation. Phys.Rev., D41:68 630, (1990). [1] S. De Leo; S. Giardino. Dirac solutions for quaternionic otentials. J. Math. Phys., 55:0301 10, (014) arxiv:1311.6673[math-h]. [13] S. De Leo; G. Ducati; S. Giardino. Quaternioninc Dirac Scattering. J. Phys. Math., 6:1000130, (015) arxiv:1505.01807[math-h]. [14] S. Giardino. Quaternionic article in a relativistic box. Found. Phys., 46(4):473 483, (016)arXiv:1504.00643[quant-h]. [15] H. Sobhani; H. Hassanabadi. Scattering in quantum mechanics under quaternionic Dirac delta otential. Can. J. Phys., 94:6 66, (016). [16] L. M. Procoio; L. A. Rozema; B. Daić; P. Walther. Comment on Adler s Does the Peres exeriment using hotons test for hyer-comlex (quaternionic) quantum theories?. arxiv:1607.01648 [quant-h] (016). [17] S. Giardino. Non-anti-hermitian quaternionic quantum mechanics. (016) arxiv:1609.00433[quant-h]. [18] S. Giardino. Quaternionic Ahraronov-Bohm effect. Adv. Al. Cliff. Alg. (017) (accet) arxiv:1606.08486[quant-h]. [19] S. De Leo; G. Ducati. The Snell law for quaternionic otentials. J. Math. Phys, 54:1109 9, (013). [0] B. Muraleetharan; K. Thirulogasanthar; I. Sabadini. A Reresentation of Weyl-Heisenberg Lie Algebra in the Quaternionic Setting. arxiv:1704.0946 [math-h] (017). 9