STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS

Similar documents
Project Description. Project Options. End Analysis On... Apr 26, :00:00. Rainfall Details

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Advanced /Surface Hydrology Dr. Jagadish Torlapati Fall 2017 MODULE 2 - ROUTING METHODS

******************* Project Description ******************* File Name... NAAF Stormwater Improvement Project 11_21_2014.SPF

WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR PAGE ESTATES

ARTICLE 5 (PART 2) DETENTION VOLUME EXAMPLE PROBLEMS

Stage Discharge Tabulation for Only Orifice Flow

EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE

September 6, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610)

City of Thornton Attn: Tim Semones Development Engineeering 9500 Civic Center Dr. Thornton, CO 80229

Section 4: Model Development and Application

City of Columbia BMP Manual. Detailed Unified Sizing Criteria Example Wet Pond Design

SERVICING BRIEF & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Colonial Road Sarsfield (Ottawa), Ontario. Report No June 15, 2017

D. B. G R A Y E N G I N E E R I N G I N C.

Submitted to: St. Johns River Power Park New Berlin Road Jacksonville, FL 32226

Section 3.0 Existing Systems Hydrology and Hydraulics

INTRODUCTION TO HYDROLOGIC MODELING USING HEC-HMS

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

STORMWATER REPORT FRITO LAY SUBDIVISION NO. 3

Chapter 10 - Sacramento Method Examples

Pressure Head: Pressure head is the height of a column of water that would exert a unit pressure equal to the pressure of the water.

DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS

APPENDIX B DRAINAGE REPORT

APPENDIX G APPENDIX G SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DESIGN RATIONALE

CITY OF CAPE CORAL STORMWATER MASTER PLAN PHASE II - PART 1 BASINS 4, 10, & 14 SUB-BASIN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Determination of Urban Runoff Using ILLUDAS and GIS

Continuing Education Course #101 Drainage Design with WinTR-55

WQ Outlet Design Single Orifice Orifice diameter = 24. Perforated riser/orifice Plate Outlet area per perforation row = 4

Caledon Villas Corporation

Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 5

DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

Stormwater Drainage Design Report. Reeve & Associates, Inc. Maverik, Inc. 88th Avenue and Pecos Street. Thornton, CO

Type 1 System Sheet Flow Sandy Soils Type 2 System Concentrated Flow Clayey Soils Type 3 System [1] Supplementary Trap Dispersive Soils

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

The effectiveness of the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) and Huff rainfall distribution methods for use in detention basin design

CIE4491 Lecture. Hydraulic design

Table 1 - Infiltration Rates

Stormwater Capacity Analysis for Westover Branch Watershed

DRAINAGE REPORT. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. Highway 7 Four Laning Silverdale Avenue to Nelson Street 100% Detailed Design

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Urban Drainage: Hydraulics. Solutions to problem sheet 2: Flows in open channels

9. Flood Routing. chapter Two

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS. Mount Prospect

Hydrology Study Report

Final Drainage Report

Coal Combustion Residuals Unit Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

Reference: Addendum#2 - Proposed Commercial Development, Terry Fox Drive at Fernbank Road, City of Ottawa, Serviceability Study, September 26, 2011

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON. ENGINEERING, SPORTS and SCIENCES BSC CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2014/2015 WATER ENGINEERING MODULE NO: BLT3023

FHWA - HIGHWAY HYDROLOGY

Coarse Sediment Traps

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Villages at Riverdale Carriage Homes Thornton, CO

How to integrate wetland processes in river basin modeling? A West African case study

A HYDROLOGIC STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ON STORM RUNOFF: A CASE STUDY IN QUEENS, NY ABSTRACT

Stormwater Management Report

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

REPORT FOR: ISLAND LAKE ESTATES 4275 Placida Road Englewood, FL 34224

HYDROLOGY REPORT Tentative Tract No. 5978

ATTACHMENT A. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Tamiami Trail East Ochopee, FL 34141

BRANDON LAKES AVENUE PRE AND POST CONDITIONS DRAINAGE REPORT

PONDNET.WK1 - Flow and Phosphorus Routing in Pond Networks

D.M. Wills Associates Limited PARTNERS IN ENGINEERING. Stormwater Management Report. City of Peterborough

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

Drainage Study for Civic Center Way

Preliminary Hydraulic Report

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

Table of Contents Project Description... 1 Summary of Existing Conditions... 1 Summary of Proposed Conditions... 1 Stormwater Compliance... 2 Collecti

Etobicoke Exfiltration System: Monitoring and Evaluation. Tim Van Seters Ryerson University July 24, 2015

: WATER SUPPLY SERVICING

Rucker Pond. Background

WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS

Stormwater Management Engineering Report

SOLUTIONS TO SELECTED PROBLEMS

Sediment Control Practices. John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE

The Effect of Stormwater Controls on Sediment Transport in Urban Streams

Chapter 5 : Design calculations

Drainage Analysis. Appendix F

UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT AND SWM REPORT

U-Shaped Sediment Traps

Bushkill Creek 3 rd Street Dam Removal Analysis

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

The key natural hazards relevant to the Project area relate to seismic activity and flood risk.

DAVID NOEL KELLY CIVIL. David Noel Kelly :24:14-04'00'

BROADSTONE VANTAGE POINT APARTMENTS NE corner of S. Parker Road, and E. Cottonwood Drive Parker, Colorado

Tutorial 10 - PMP Estimation

Rock Sizing for Small Dam Spillways

Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological Performance and Suspended Solids

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load

Chutes Part 5: Rock linings

Volume 1, Chapter 4 Rainfall

Sacramento Area Hydrology Model (SAHM) Guidance Document. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University

Wal-mart Store # Ft. Walton Beach, FL NE Corner of Eglin Parkway/S.R. 85 and South Street STORMWATER REPORT. February 2017

Study 16.5 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)

PRELIMINARY CULVERT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR CULVERT NO. 008-C OREGON AVENUE OVER PINEHURST CREEK

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

Stormwater Management Report

Transcription:

STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS REF : C7011-2390 AT 19a-23 MEMORIAL AVENUE BLACKWALL FOR MR KERR

Contents 1.0 Detention System Requirements 1.1 Storage-Area calcs. 1.2 Data Files for Pre & Post Developed Conditions 1.3 Summary of Pre & Post Developed Discharges Files On Disk C7011-2390 -DRAINS.DRN

1.0 Detention System Requirements

1.1 Storage-Area calcs. DATA: Detention A Site Area Assessed due to easements Site Area = 0.2532 ha 2532 sq.m Volume Required 28.60 cu.m Total Area 195.00 sq.m Impervious Area Pre Development = 0 sqm Percentage Impervious Pre Development = 0% Stage Storage-Discharge Relationship Impervious Area POST Development = 1532 sqm Percentage Impervious POST Development = 61% Stage Storage Area Avg. Depth Storage (m) (sq.m) (m) (cu.m) Catchment directed through OSD = 2244.00 sqm 146.5 % 3.10 7.5 0 0.000 4.20 7.5 0.8 6.000 OSD Bypass Areas : Impervious 30.00 sqm 10.4 % 4.30 195.0 0.033 6.440 Pervious 258.00 sqm 89.6 % 4.40 215.0 0.13 28.600 Total 288 sqm Invert of pit = 3.10 m Q=d^2*sqrt(h)/0.48 Slope of Site = 1.0 % Time of Concentration tc = Orifice Dia. = 155 mm d=sqrt((0.48*q)/sqrt(h)) Effective Flow Length = 41 m 2 min. 1:5 Max. Water Level achie 4.40 m Hortons n= 0.1 2 min. 1:100 Storage achieved 28.600 cu.m FFL of house = 4.7 m Basix Allowance Roof Gutter Level = 7.1 m Raintank Basix = 12000 L Invert of outlet = 3 m Raintank Provided = 12000 L Raintank Pad Level = 4.53 m Water Level in Tank RL for Basix = 4.59 m = orifice IL. Depth=0.06m Nominal tank Volume used = 12000 L 50% OSD Concession= 6000 L Total Tank Height = 2.020 m OSD Tank Height = 1.85 m Total Effective Tank Required = 40600 L OK

1.2 DRAINS Data File for Pre & Post Developed Conditions PIT / NODE DETAILS Version 9 Name Type Family Size Ponding Pressure Surface Max Pond Base Blocking x y Bolt-down id Part Full Volume Change Elev (m) Depth (m) Inflow Factor lid Shock Loss (cu.m) Coeff. Ku (cu.m/s) Pre Node 10 0 256-139 2 Ground Node 4.50 0 444-153 8 N1 Node 4.3 0 571-185 12 Outlet Node 4.25 0 617.232-211.091 45 Roof Node 7.10 0 440-74 9 DETENTION BASIN DETAILS Name Elev Surf. Area Init Vol. (cu.moutlet Type K Dia(mm) Centre RL Pit Family Pit Type x y HED Crest RL Crest Lid OSD Basin 3.10 7.5000 0 Orifice 155 3.1775 558-103 No 5 4.20 7.5000 4.30 195.0000 4.40 215.0000 SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS Name Pit or Total Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Lag Time Gutter Gutter Node Area Area Area Area Time Time Time Length Length Length Slope(%) Slope Slope Rough Rough Rough or Factor Length Slope (ha) % % % (min) (min) (min) (m) (m) (m) % % % (m) % Pre Site Pre 0.2532 0 100 0 0 0 0 41 41 0 1.0 1.0 0 0.01 0.07 0 0 Bypass Ground 0.0288 10.4 89.6 0 0 0 0 41 41 0 1.0 1.0 0 0.01 0.1 0 0 Roof Area Roof 0.2244 100 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 20 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 PIPE DETAILS Name From To Length U/S IL D/S IL Slope Type Dia I.D. Rough Pipe Is No. Pipes Chg From At Chg Chg Rl Chg RL etc (m) (m) (m) (%) (mm) (mm) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) Pipe1 Roof OSD Basin 20 3.30 3.10 3.6 upvc, not und 225 242 0.03 NewFixed 1 Roof 0 Pipe2 Ground N1 41 4.25 3.05 8 upvc, not und 150 154 0.03 New 1 Ground 0 Pipe3 OSD Basin N1 10 3.10 3.05 66 upvc, not und 225 242 0.03 NewFixed 1 OSD Basin 0 Pipe4 N1 Outlet 5 3.05 3 1 upvc, not und 300 303 0.03 New 1 N1 0 DETAILS of SERVICES CROSSING PIPES Pipe Chg Bottom Height of Ser Chg Bottom Height of SChg Bottom Height of Seretc (m) Elev (m) (m) (m) Elev (m) (m) (m) Elev (m) (m) etc CHANNEL DETAILS Name From To Type Length U/S IL D/S IL Slope Base Width L.B. Slope R.B. Slope Manning Depth Roofed (m) (m) (m) (%) (m) (1:?) (1:?) n (m)

1.3 DRAINS Summary of Pre & Post Developed Discharges 5 YEAR DRAINS results prepared from Version 2016.08 PIT / NODE DETAILS Version 8 Name Max HGL Max Pond Max Surface Max Pond Min Overflow Constraint HGL Flow Arriving Volume Freeboard (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (cu.m) (m) Ground 4.28 0.004 Pit1 3.26 0 1.04 0 None Outlet 3.12 0 Roof 4.69 0.094 SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS Name Max Paved Grassed Paved Grassed Supp. Due to Storm Flow Q Max Q Max Q Tc Tc Tc (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (min) (min) (min) Pre Site 0.052 0 0.052 4.03 12.95 0 AR&R 5 year, 2 hours storm, average 32.3 mm/h, Zone 1 Bypass 0.004 0.001 0.004 3.45 18.86 0 AR&R 5 year, 1 hour storm, average 47.8 mm/h, Zone 1 Roof Area 0.094 0.094 0 0.59 0 0 AR&R 5 year, 5 minutes storm, average 150 mm/h, Zone 1 Outflow Volumes for Total Catchment (0.23 impervious + 0.28 pervious = 0.51 total ha) Storm Total Rainfal Total Runoff Impervious RunPervious Runoff cu.m cu.m (Runoff % cu.m (Runoff %cu.m (Runoff %) AR&R 5 year, 5 minut 63.3 31.02 (49.0%) 26.15 (92.0%) 4.87 (14.0%) AR&R 5 year, 10 minu 97.9 56.79 (58.0%) 41.69 (94.8%) 15.10 (28.0%) AR&R 5 year, 20 minu 143.48 90.31 (62.9%) 62.15 (96.5%) 28.15 (35.6%) AR&R 5 year, 30 minu 174.71 108.88 (62.3%) 76.18 (97.1%) 32.70 (34.0%) AR&R 5 year, 1 hour s 242.06 154.29 (63.7%) 106.42 (97.9%)47.86 (35.9%) AR&R 5 year, 2 hours 327.13 207.01 (63.3%) 144.62 (98.5%)62.39 (34.6%)

PIPE DETAILS Name Max Q Max V Max U/S Max D/S Due to Storm (cu.m/s) (m/s) HGL (m) HGL (m) Pipe2 0.004 1.45 4.281 3.26 AR&R 5 year, 1 hour storm, average 47.8 mm/h, Zone 1 Pipe4 0.052 1.86 3.187 3.125 AR&R 5 year, 20 minutes storm, average 85 mm/h, Zone 1 Pipe1 0.093 2.02 4.69 4.33 AR&R 5 year, 5 minutes storm, average 150 mm/h, Zone 1 Pipe3 0.048 1.14 3.331 3.26 AR&R 5 year, 20 minutes storm, average 85 mm/h, Zone 1 CHANNEL DETAILS Name Max Q Max V Due to Storm (cu.m/s) (m/s) OVERFLOW ROUTE DETAILS Name Max Q U/S Max Q D/S Safe Q Max D Max DxV Max Width Max V Due to Storm OF48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OF1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DETENTION BASIN DETAILS Name Max WL MaxVol Max Q Max Q Max Q Total Low Level High Level OSD Basin 4.33 22.1 0.048 0.048 0 CONTINUITY CHECK for AR&R 5 year, 1 hour storm, average 47.8 mm/h, Zone 1 Node Inflow Outflow Storage Chang Difference (cu.m) (cu.m) (cu.m) % Pre 43.47 43.47 0 0 Ground 5.8 5.8 0-0.1 Pit1 110.87 110.97 0-0.1 Outlet 110.97 110.97 0 0 Roof 105.02 105.11 0-0.1 OSD Basin 105.11 105.07 0.04 0 N1 0 0 0 0 Run Log for C7011 run at 22:12:37 on 22/8/2016 No water upwelling from any pit. Freeboard was adequate at all pits. Flows were safe in all overflow routes.

100 YEAR DRAINS results prepared from Version 2016.08 PIT / NODE DETAILS Version 8 Name Max HGL Max Pond Max Surface Max Pond Min Overflow Constraint HGL Flow Arriving Volume Freeboard (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (cu.m) (m) Ground 4.3 0.01 Pit1 3.46 0.076 0.84 0.024 Inlet Capacity Outlet 3.19 0.024 Roof 5.39 0.15 SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS Name Max Paved Grassed Paved Grassed Supp. Due to Storm Flow Q Max Q Max Q Tc Tc Tc (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (min) (min) (min) Pre Site 0.115 0 0.115 2.25 7.25 0 AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 138 mm/h, Zone 1 Bypass 0.01 0.002 0.009 2.25 12.34 0 AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 138 mm/h, Zone 1 Roof Area 0.15 0.15 0 0.49 0 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 240 mm/h, Zone 1 Outflow Volumes for Total Catchment (0.23 impervious + 0.28 pervious = 0.51 total ha) Storm Total Rainfal Total Runoff Impervious RunPervious Runoff cu.m cu.m (Runoff % cu.m (Runoff %cu.m (Runoff %) AR&R 100 year, 5 min 101.28 69.12 (68.2%) 43.21 (95.0%) 25.92 (46.4%) AR&R 100 year, 10 m 157.83 116.49 (73.8%) 68.60 (96.8%) 47.89 (55.1%) AR&R 100 year, 20 m 232.94 177.92 (76.4%) 102.33 (97.8%)75.59 (58.9%) AR&R 100 year, 30 m 286.12 218.28 (76.3%) 126.20 (98.2%)92.07 (58.4%) AR&R 100 year, 1 hou 400.06 307.79 (76.9%) 177.37 (98.7%)130.43 (59.2%) AR&R 100 year, 2 hou 546.91 421.75 (77.1%) 243.31 (99.1%)178.44 (59.2%)

PIPE DETAILS Name Max Q Max V Max U/S Max D/S Due to Storm (cu.m/s) (m/s) HGL (m) HGL (m) Pipe2 0.01 1.92 4.301 3.462 AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 138 mm/h, Zone 1 Pipe4 0.105 2.22 3.352 3.19 AR&R 100 year, 1 hour storm, average 79 mm/h, Zone 1 Pipe1 0.149 3.24 5.39 4.4 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 240 mm/h, Zone 1 Pipe3 0.05 1.09 3.532 3.462 AR&R 100 year, 10 minutes storm, average 187 mm/h, Zone 1 CHANNEL DETAILS Name Max Q Max V Due to Storm (cu.m/s) (m/s) OVERFLOW ROUTE DETAILS Name Max Q U/S Max Q D/S Safe Q Max D Max DxV Max Width Max V Due to Storm OF48 0.024 0.024 0 0.015 0.01 4 0.39 AR&R 100 year, 1 hour storm, average 79 mm/h, Zone 1 OF1 0.076 0.076 0 0.03 0.02 4 0.64 AR&R 100 year, 1 hour storm, average 79 mm/h, Zone 1 DETENTION BASIN DETAILS Name Max WL MaxVol Max Q Max Q Max Q Total Low Level High Level OSD Basin 4.4 36.7 0.126 0.05 0.076 CONTINUITY CHECK for AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 138 mm/h, Zone 1 Node Inflow Outflow Storage Chang Difference (cu.m) (cu.m) (cu.m) % Pre 68.75 68.75 0 0 Ground 8.2 8.2 0 0 Pit1 109.08 109.21 0-0.1 Outlet 109.21 109.21 0 0 Roof 100.98 100.92 0 0.1 OSD Basin 100.92 100.88 0.04 0 N1 0 0 0 0 Run Log for C7011 run at 22:12:25 on 22/8/2016 No water upwelling from any pit. Freeboard was adequate at all pits. Flows were safe in all overflow routes.