PURPOSE... i. Abbreviations... i. 1 Introduction Methods Compliance with Management Plans Results Discussion...

Similar documents
VEGETATION ATTRIBUTES OF FOUR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) SITES ON THE VICTORIAN VOLCANIC PLAIN

Appendix A.8.21 Lackagh Quarry Petrifying Spring Survey Results

Provisional revision of the MG4 Alopecurus pratensis - Sanguisorba officinalis community Hilary Wallace and Mike Prosser

Do Native Plant Mixtures Reduce Invasions Along Roadsides in Wisconsin? Joslyn Mink MS Candidate University of Wisconsin-Madison

Impacts of Invasion of Bitou Bush on Coastal Communities

A Natura 2000 Monitoring Framework Using Plant Species Gradients for Spectral Habitat Assessment

Family Taxon Common Name

Catsear, Hypochoeris radicata A taprooted perennial with thistle-like flower. Leaf margin is not as deeply incised as Capeweed or Dandelion

Appendix A.8.4 Galway City Transport Project Assessment of Annex I habitats in the Ballygarraun survey area (Perrin, 2014)

Karr J.R. and D.R. Dudley Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Manager 5:55-68.

MONITORING DATA AIR SERVICES AUSTRALIA PROPERTY SHANES PARK

Identifying faithful neighbours of rare plants in Britain; an application of the TPP dataset

Re: Vegetation Survey of Peppermint Box and Irongrass communities at Kanmantoo Copper Mine

EFFECTS OF FISH HABITAT RESTORATION ACTIVITIES ON PLANT COMMUNITIES IN

Varying diversity patterns of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens at different spatial scales in central European landscapes

COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA

A revision of the Alopecurus pratensis - Sanguisorba officinalis (MG4) grassland community of the NVC 2014

An ecological basis for the management of grassland field margins

Alde-Ore Estuary Complex NVC 2013

Preliminary investigation of floodplain vegetation of Nyah-Vinifera Forest

Occurrence and distribution of Chenopodium vulvaria L. in Košice city, Slovakia

POLLINATOR HABITAT EVALUATION FORM

Orbit GR.

Appendix A.8.19 Habitat Survey Results - Species Lists

Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication

Classification of Plant Communities

Ainsdale Hope School playing-field an ecological survey

Lamb Drove SUDS Showcase Project Cambourne Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2010

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

September Dr. Jennifer Firn

Dunbeacon Shingle SAC (site code: )

3 Vegetation Structure on Oil-Shale Bings

Padgbury Lane South, Congleton REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY

Diversity and Floristics of Monocots

Shadow Cliffs Wildflowers

Contents. 1. Introduction 3 2. Saltmarsh in Halton 4 3. Survey 5 4. Results 6 5. Conclusion 11

Re: Berwick Health and Education Precinct Native Vegetation Assessment (excluding Southern Drain) Methods. 21 December 2016

St Mary s Churchyard, Potton

FACT SHEET VICTORIAN DESALINATION PROJECT

Annotated Bibliography on the Ecology and Management of Invasive Species: Sweet vernalgrass (Anthoxanthum odoratum)

Herbicide Effectiveness on Weeds in Tree Fruits

ECOLOGY OF EUPHRASIA VIGURSII

The Role of Native Annual Forbs in the Restoration of Invaded Rangelands

THE SAND DUNE VEGETATION OF CHRYSTALLS BEACH, SOUTHERN NEW ZEALAND, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE CUSHION COMMUNITY. Study site

Observations on Grasses in the Auckland Region

On the Case: Investigating Alaska s Alien Invaders

Study 11.9 Invasive Plant Study

Herbicide Effectiveness on Weeds in Mint

Beach and Dune Plant Associations of British Columbia

Plants and arthropods as bio-indicators in vineyard agroecosystem

Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis

Sustainability 101: Just What is Carbon Sequestration? Mary Owen UMass, Amherst, Extension Turf Program

Lugg Meadows Vegetation Study

Recovery of montane swamp complex after bushfires in north east Victoria 2003

Quantifying the unquantifiable: How to measure the success of habitat creation or restoration?

Oikos. Appendix 1. Adult understory Seed bank. Nestedness [NODF] 30. Nurse age [years]

FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY AND MOWING REGIME OF FLOWER STRIPS AS TOOLS TO SUPPORT POLLINATORS AND TO SUPPRESS WEEDS

Barcode UK: saving plants and pollinators using DNA barcoding

Durham Coastal Grasslands Restoration Project

Surveying Diversity and Distribution of Non-native Plants at the Albany Bulb. Alexander Chu

Map showing location of tropical rainforests

Year-to-year changes in unfertilized meadows of great species richness detected by point quadrat analysis

The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis*

A Phenological Detectability Calendar for Invasive Plant Species

Weed resistance in European cereal production: Status, causes and perspectives Per Kudsk Aarhus University Denmark

ECOFACT Volume 1. The main objectives of the work which produced the present book were therefore:

Oikos. Appendix 1 OIK Conradi, T., Temperton, V. M. and Kollmann, J. 2017: Resource availability determines the importance of nichebased

Between-observer variation in the application of a standard method of habitat mapping by environmental consultants in the UK

THE ROLE OF DISTURBANCE IN PERMANENT PASTURES

The integration of management and monitoring at Kenfig SAC. Clive Hurford

Big Break Wildflowers

Assessment of samples for plant remains from Silbury Hill

Wednesday Walk/Drive South Forest Way, Tallaganda Forest 1 May 2013

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Riesling Trail Vegetation Survey Lennon Street Clare to Horrocks Highway Auburn

Rose, F. (1989) Grasses, sedges, rushes and ferns of the British Isles and north-western Europe. Viking

Wetlands in a Watershed/Landscape Context Vegetation & Wildlife August 15, Kendra Moseley, Regional ESS, Soil Science Division

Vegetation of Ironbark Nature Reserve and Bornhardtia Voluntary Conservation Agreement, Northern Tablelands, New South Wales

Coyote Hills Wildflowers

Cunninghamia: a journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia

VITTADINIA TRILOBA AND RUMEX ACETOSELLA COMMUNITIES IN THE SEMI-ARID REGIONS OF THE SOUTH ISLAND

Laois Habitats Survey 2008

Assessing Effectiveness of Management Actions on Recovery of CSS Plant Communities Over-Time

Plant invasions in treeless vegetation of the Australian Alps

Ustilago species causing leaf-stripe smut revisited ARTICLE INTRODUCTION

CIPWG Workshop on Invasive Species Risk Assessment. June 15, 2017

NOKTH CAPE QUADRATS by W. J. Rae* SUMMARY

P7: Limiting Factors in Ecosystems

20 Common Urban Plants in Ireland

Slovene Plant Gene Bank (SPGB) and Genetic Resources Programme

OPPORTUNITY PONDS A CELLS (PCMA_008)

Appendix VI. Archaeobotany of the Late Neolithic site Vlaardingen, the Netherlands

Pollinator Conservation

The Effect of Water Stress on the Efficacy of Mesotrione to Control Weeds in Cool-season Turfgrass Stands

Vernal Pools Conservation Zone Revegetation Plan

Calculations Equation of Time. EQUATION OF TIME = apparent solar time - mean solar time

The new flora of northeastern USA: quantifying introduced plant species occupancy in forest ecosystems

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STUDY OF PALUDAL VEGETATION FROM THE NEAGRA ŞARULUI RIVER S BASIN (SUCEAVA COUNTY) LOREDANA ASOLTANI.

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Transcription:

PURPOSE... i Abbreviations... i 1 Introduction... 1 2 Methods... 3 3 Compliance with Management Plans... 5 4 Results... 6 5 Discussion... 8 6 Next Steps... 9 Appendix A...

1

Table 1 Flora monitoring undertaken to date for the Habitat Slab experiment

Figure 2 Habitat Slab experimental plots at property 335, 23 months after slabbing, April 2011

Table 2 Modified Braun-Blanquet scale used to assess cover abundance during the experiment + 1 2 3 4 5 6 <1% <5% 5<15% 15<25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100%

Table 3 Mean Braun-Blanquet cover abundance of native graminoid species across each experimental plot over ten survey periods Disturbed Control - seeded Disturbed Control not seeded C L1 L2 L3 L4 S1 S2 S3 S4 May-09 - - 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Jun-09 0.7 0.7-0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 - - - - Jul-09 2.5 0.8-1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 - - - - Oct-09 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.6 Feb-10 0.6 0.3 2.3 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.8 Apr-10 0.5 0.2 3.4 0.9 2.5 2.0 2.1 1.3 0.6 1.4 1.4 Jul-10 0.6 1.0 3.3 1.8 2.5 1.5 2.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.8 Oct-10 0.7 0.8 3.0 1.0 1.6 1.1 1.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.9 Jan -11 1.9 0.8 3.3 1.6 2.3 2.0 2.0 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.2 April-11 2 0.5 0.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.4 2.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.4 August-11 0.5 0.6 3.8 2.2 2.6 1.3 2.4 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.1 Table 4 Mean Braun-Blanquet cover abundance of introduced species (all life forms) across each experimental plot over ten survey periods Disturbed Control - seeded Disturbed Control not seeded C L1 L2 L3 L4 S1 S2 S3 S4 May-09 - - 5.2 5.3 4.7 5.0 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.8 5.0 Jun-09 6.0 4.7-5.3 5.5 5.2 5.0 - - - - Jul-09 6.0 5.7-4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 - - - - Oct-09 2.3 2.5 5.8 4.8 4.8 5.2 4.0 4.8 5.3 5.2 5.0 Feb-10 3.8 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.5 5.3 4.5 4.8 Apr-10 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.7 2.8 4.6 3.8 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.2 Jul-10 4.8 4.0 3.8 5.7 4.7 5.3 5.2 5.8 6.0 6.0 5.8 Oct-10 5.7 5.7 4.3 5.8 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Jan -11 5.8 5.4 4.0 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 April-11 3 6.0 5.8 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.0 5.3 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 August-11 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2 During the April 2011 surveys, properties 327 and 328 were not accessed due to landholder issues. This has influenced the reliability of the results for this monitoring period, as only four of the six sites were monitored. 3 During the April 2011 surveys, properties 327 and 328 were not accessed due to landholder issues

Appendix A

31 21633 13: Golden Sun Moth Habitat Slab Replacement Floristic Survey Property # Date Observers Easting Photo no. s Quadrat dimensions Northing Control site Y / N Overall cover abundance of vegetation Time started Time completed Site no. / ID 1. Species abundance and Overall composition + 1 2 3 4 5 6 <1% <5% 5<15% 15<25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Native species (tick if present)? Cover Introduced species (tick if present)? Cover Austrodanthonia caespitosa Acetosella vulgaris Austrodanthonia duttoniana Agrostis sp. Austrodanthonia setacea Anthoxanthum odoratum Austrodanthonia sp. Arctotheca calendula Austrostipa rudis subsp. rudis Bromus diandrus Austrostipa sp. Bromus hordeaceus subsp. hordeaceus Carex inversa Chenopodium pumilio Cassinia sp. Cirsium vulgare Dichondra repens Conyza bonariensis Elymus scaber var. scaber Conyza sp. Epilobium hirsutum Cynodon dactylon var. dactylon Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dactylis glomerata Euchiton sp. Festuca arundinacea Juncus amabilis Holcus lanatus Juncus bufonius Hordeum sp. Juncus pallidus Hypochoeris radicata Juncus flavidus Lactuca serriola Juncus sp. Lepidium africanum Hypericum gramineum Lolium sp. Lomandra filiformis Lotus sp. Lythrum hyssopifolia Paspalum dilatatum Microlaena stipoides var. stipoides Paspalum sp. Oxalis perennans Phalaris aquatica Pseudognaphalium luteoalbum Phalaris minor Rumex brownii Plantago lanceolata Senecio quadrifida Plantago sp. Themeda triandra Poa sp. Unknown Native Poaceae Polygonum aviculare Romulea rosea Rubus fruticosus spp. agg Rumex sp. Setaria parviflora Sonchus sp. Trifolium sp. Vulpia sp. Unknown Introduced Poaceae Native graminoids % cover (inc.juncus, Lomandra, Dianella etc) Native forbs % cover Bryophytes/Lichens % cover Litter % cover Introduced graminoids % cover (inc.cynodon) Introduced forbs % cover Bare ground % cover Overall % cover of introduced species

2. Vertical Structure Native grasses (Poaceae) Introduced grasses Native sedge or rush (eg. Lomandra, Juncus) Introduced sedge or rush Native forbs Introduced forbs (inc. R.rosa) 0-10cm 10-30cm 30-100cm >100cm 3. Inter tussock distance (irrespective of whether tussock native or introduced, alive or dead) for 10 random points within treatment/control area. Note: SM = Soil Moisture * Distance (cm) to edge of closest tussock (inc. Juncus) with diameter of 3 cm (if Cynodon, distance to closest point where plant is completely attached to the ground, not just a rooting point along a rhizome). 1 Species Distance* SM % SM 2 Species Distance* SM % SM mv mv 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 3 Species Distance* SM % SM 4 Species Distance* SM % SM mv mv 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 Species Distance* SM % SM 6 Species Distance* SM % SM mv mv 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4

7 Species Distance* SM % SM 8 Species Distance* SM % SM mv mv 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 9 Species Distance* SM % SM 10 Species Distance* SM % SM mv mv 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4