Lattices for Light Sources

Similar documents
Lattices and Emittance

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Minimum emittance superbend lattices?

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

LOW EMITTANCE MODEL FOR THE ANKA SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SOURCE

FIRST OPERATION OF THE SWISS LIGHT SOURCE

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

MAX-lab. MAX IV Lattice Design: Multibend Achromats for Ultralow Emittance. Simon C. Leemann

Preliminary design study of JUICE. Joint Universities International Circular Electronsynchrotron

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Operational Experience with HERA

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

COMBINER RING LATTICE

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

Commissioning of PETRA III. Klaus Balewski on behalf of the PETRA III Team IPAC 2010, 25 May, 2010

Lecture 2: Modeling Accelerators Calculation of lattice functions and parameters. X. Huang USPAS, January 2015 Hampton, Virginia

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

Iranian Light Source Facility (ILSF) Project

Experience on Coupling Correction in the ESRF electron storage ring

Status of Optics Design

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

SLS Status and Development of an SLS2 Upgrade

3.2 The MAX IV 3 GeV Storage Ring

Abstract. 1. Introduction

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Diagnostics at the MAX IV 3 GeV storage ring during commissioning. PPT-mall 2. Åke Andersson On behalf of the MAX IV team

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

3.2.2 Magnets. The properties of the quadrupoles, sextupoles and correctors are listed in tables t322_b,_c and _d.

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Lattice Optimization Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm

Beam dynamics and magnet design challenges for 4th-generation storage ring light sources

Summary Report: Working Group 2 Storage Ring Sources Future Light Source Workshop SLAC, March 1-5, S. Krinsky and R. Hettel

Putting it all together

COMMISSIONING OF THE MAX IV LIGHT SOURCE

Advanced Storage Photon Ring Source Upgrade Project:

Non-linear dynamics Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Accelerator Design and Construction Progress of TPS Project

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Use of Crab Cavities for Short X-ray Pulse Production in Rings

Simulation of Optics Correction for ERLs. V. Sajaev, ANL

Measurement and Compensation of Betatron Resonances at the CERN PS Booster Synchrotron

La#ce Design for the MAX IV 3 GeV Storage Ring. A Mul<bend Achromat with Higher- order Mul<poles

COMMISSIONING AND STATUS OF THE DIAMOND STORAGE RING

HIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU

MAGNETS AND INSERTION DEVICES FOR THE ESRF II

ILC Spin Rotator. Super B Workshop III. Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University. with

Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring. David L. Rubin December 22, 2011

Analysis of KEK-ATF Optics and Coupling Using Orbit Response Matrix Analysis 1

Effect of Insertion Devices. Effect of IDs on beam dynamics

Plans for CESR (or Life Without CLEO)

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

FEMTO - Preliminary studies of effects of background electron pulses. Paul Scherrer Institut CH-5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland

Beam Dynamics. Gennady Stupakov. DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004

The FAIR Accelerator Facility

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

FACET-II Design Update

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

STATUS REPORT ON STORAGE RING REALIGNMENT AT SLRI

Exploration of a Tevatron-Sized Ultimate Light Source

Overview of Acceleration

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

Part II Effect of Insertion Devices on the Electron Beam

Beam dynamics measurement during ALBA commissioning

ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Accelerator Physics Challenges in the Design of Multi-Bend-Achromat-Based Storage Rings

Modeling CESR-c. D. Rubin. July 22, 2005 Modeling 1

2.6 Electron transport lines

RADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING

Update on Optics Modeling for the ATF Damping Ring at KEK Studies for low vertical emittance

Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

Beam Optics design for CEPC collider ring

Emittance preservation in TESLA

Single-Bunch Effects from SPX Deflecting Cavities

Low Emittance Storage Ring for Light Source. Sukho Kongtawong PHY 554 Fall 2016

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

COMMISSIONING OF NSLS-II*

Low alpha mode for SPEAR3 and a potential THz beamline

Low Emittance Machines

Key words: diffraction-limited storage ring, half integer resonance, momentum acceptance, beta beats

1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS

Impedance and Collective Effects in Future Light Sources. Karl Bane FLS2010 Workshop 1 March 2010

Introduction to Accelerators

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012

IP switch and big bend

RF System Calibration Using Beam Orbits at LEP

The optimization for the conceptual design of a 300 MeV proton synchrotron *

NSLS-II. Accelerator Physics Group November 11, Lingyun Yang NSLS-II Brookhaven National Laboratory. Multiobjective DA Optimization for

Wigglers for Damping Rings

Transcription:

Andreas Streun Swiss Light Source SLS, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland Contents: Global requirements: size, brightness, stability Lattice building blocks: magnets and other devices Emittance: lattice cells, minimum emittance, vertical emittance Other lattice parameters: damping, tune, chromaticity etc. Acceptances: lifetime and injection; physical, dynamic and energy acceptance Lattice errors: misalignments, multipolar errors A.Streun, PSI 1

Global requirements Number and length of straight sections minimum size Available area maximum size Synchrotron radiation properties radiation spectrum, insertion device types beam energy brightness emittance, coupling, energy spread Stability requirements current stability beam lifetime acceptances orbit stability mechanical tolerances, correction schemes Flexibility and future upgrade potential Budget A.Streun, PSI 2

Lattice Design Interfaces Magnet Design: Technological limits, coil space, multipolar errors Vacuum: Impedance, pressure, physical apertures, space Radiofrequency: Energy acceptance, bunchlength, space Diagnostics: Alignment: Beam position monitors, space Orbit distortions and correction Mechanical engineering: Girders, vibrations Design engineering: Assembly, feasibility = Beam current Vacuum, Radiofrequency = Space requirements Magnet, Vacuum, RF, Diagnostics, Engineering A.Streun, PSI 3

Space requirements A lattice section... (top)...as seen by the lattice designer (bottom)... as seen by the design engineer (right)... and how it looks in reality A.Streun, PSI 4

Lattice building blocks Lattice components Parameters Purpose Bending magnet b 1! = ρ 1, φ, b 2, ζ in,out... form a ring Quadrupole b 2, L focussing Sextupole b 3, L chromaticity correction RF cavity λ rf, V rf acceleration, long. focussing Septum magnet position & width injection Kicker magnet b1 (t)dl injection Correctors b1 dl, a 1 dl orbit correction BPM passiv orbit measurement Skew Quadrupole a2 dl coupling correction Undulator λ u, N u, B u, g synchrotron light A.Streun, PSI 5

Lattice building blocks Iron dominated dipole magnet Hds = jda = Coil cross section A A = B 2j c ( Siron µ o µ r + g µ o ) µ r 1 A Bg 2j c µ o S iron coil A L total g L iron L eff A.Streun, PSI 6

Lattice building blocks Magnet poletip fields and apertures coil width poletip field aperture L tot L eff 2 [mm] B pt [T] R [mm] Bending magnets: 65... 150 1.5 20... 35 (=g/2) Quadrupoles: 40... 70 0.75 30... 43 Sextupoles: 40... 80 0.6 30... 50 (data from various light sources) Magnet power R n = Apertures: As small as possible As large as necessary acceptance A.Streun, PSI 7

Lattice building blocks Lattice Design Code Model: complete set of elements, correct methods for tracking and concatenation, well documented approximations Elementary functions: beta functions and dispersions, periodic solutions, closed orbit finder, energy variations, tracking, matching Toolbox: Fourier transforms of particle data ( resonance analysis), minimizaton routines ( dynamic aperture optimization, coupling suppression), linear algebra package ( orbit correction) User convenience: editor functions, graphical user interface, editable text files Extended functions: RF dimensioning, geometry plots, lifetime calculations, injection design, alignment errors, multipolar errors, ground vibrations Connectivity: database access, control system access ( real machine) A.Streun, PSI 8

Emittance Natural horizontal emittance Flat lattice: ɛ xo [nm rad] = 55 hc 32 3 m e c 2 }{{} 3.83 10 13 m Lattice invariant (or dispersion s emittance ): γ 2 I 5 J x I 2 = 1470 (E[GeV]) 2 H/ρ3 J x 1/ρ 2 H(s) = γ x (s)d(s) 2 + 2α x (s)d(s)d (s) + β x (s)d (s) 2 Horizontal damping partition J x 1... lattice average... mag magnets average Simplification for isomagnetic lattice: ɛ xo [nm rad] = 1470 (E[GeV]) 2 H mag ρj x A.Streun, PSI 9

E, Lattice Cells Building low emittance lattices... = >? @ > N > O A B C D A.Streun, PSI 10

Lattice Cells DBA example: ESRF high beta straight sections low beta DBA cell @ 6 GeV A.Streun, PSI 11

Lattice Cells TBA example: SLS 11.5 m straight 4 m straight 7 m straight 2 2 @ 2.4 GeV A.Streun, PSI 12

Lattice Cells Combined function example: SLS booster synchrotron @ 2.4 GeV A.Streun, PSI 13

Emittance Minimum Emittance d H(α xc, β xc, D c, D c) mag = 0 = Minimum emittance: ɛ xo [nm rad] = 1470 (E[GeV])2 J x Φ [rad] magnet deflection angle (Φ/2 1) Φ 3 F 12 15 β D β D D c β c β f L F = 1 F = 3 β xc = 1 2 L D 15 c = 1 24ρ L2 s f = 3 L β 3 8 xf = L 320 s f A.Streun, PSI 14

Emittance Minimum emittance 2 Deviations from minimum: b = d = β xc β xc,min ɛ xo,min F = ɛxo D c D c,min 135 F=4 F=5 Relative emittance F : F=2 F=3 180 5 4 (d 1)2 + (b F) 2 = F 2 F=1 Phase advance in cell: ( ) 6 b Ψ = 2 arctan 15 (d 3) 284 225 F = 1 = Ψ = 284.5 A.Streun, PSI 15

Emittance Minimum emittance cell 10 gradient free sector bend, b=d=1, E = 3 GeV = F = 1: Theoretical minimum emittance (Ex)= 1.5 nm rad Tune advance (Qx)=0.7902 Ideal phase advance Ψ = 284.5. A.Streun, PSI 16

Emittance Damping times τ i = 6.67 ms C [m]e [GeV] J i U [kev] J x = 1 D J y = 1 J s = 2 + D D = 1 2π mag D(s) [b 1 (s) 2 + 2b 2 (s)] ds Energy loss per turn: U [kev] = 26.5(E[GeV]) 3 B[T] Stability requirement: 2 < D < 1 Separate function bends: D 1 in light sources. Combined function bending magnets: Adjust gradients! Option: Vertical focusing in bending magnet: b 2 < 0 J x 2: half emittance! A.Streun, PSI 17

Emittance Energy spread and Beam size r.m.s. natural energy spread: σ e = 6.64 10 4 B[T] E[GeV ] J s J s 2 Beam size and effective emittance: σ x (s) = ɛ x β x (s) + (σ e D(s)) 2 σ y (s) = ɛ y β y (s) ɛ x,eff (s) = ɛ 2 xo + ɛ xo H(s)σ 2 e A.Streun, PSI 18

Emittance Vertical emittance Ideal flat Lattice: H y 0 ɛ y = 0 Real Lattice: Errors as sources of vertical emittance ɛ y Vertical dipoles (a 1 ): Skew quadrupoles (a 2 ): Dipole rolls Quadrupole rolls roll = s-rotation Quadrupole heaves Sextupole heaves heave = y displacement Vertical dispersion (D y ) Linear coupling (κ) orbit correction skew quadrupoles for suppression Emittance ratio g = ɛ y ɛ x ɛ x = 1 1+g ɛ xo ɛ y = g 1+g ɛ xo Coupling corrected lattices: g 10 3 BUT: Diffraction limitation Brightness 1/g only for hard X-rays Touschek lifetime (bunch volume) g A.Streun, PSI 19

Lattice parameters Circumference and periodicity Circumference C Area minimize Optics relax Spaces reserve RF harmonic number C = hλ rf h = h 1 h 2 h 3... Ritsumeikan PSR LEP C = 98 cm C = 27 km Periodicity N per Advantages of large periodicity: simplicity: design & operation stability: resonances cost efficiency: few types DORIS: N per = 1 APS: N per = 40 A.Streun, PSI 20

Lattice parameters Working point Betatron resonances: aq x + bq y = p Tune constraints: NO integer NO half integer NO sum resonance NO sextupole resonances Multiturn injection: and more... order: n = a + b systematic: N per /p = integer regular: b even, skew: b odd (a, b, k, n, N per, p integers) Q x;y = k dipolar errors Q x;y = (2k + 1)/2 gradient errors Q x + Q y = p coupling Q x = p, 3Q x = p, Q x ± 2Q y = p dynamic acceptance frac(q) 0.2 septum A.Streun, PSI 21

Lattice parameters Working point: Example Ideal lattice Real Lattice A.Streun, PSI 22

Acceptance Acceptance: 6D volume of stable particles decoupling: horizontal, vertical and longitudinal 2D-acceptances Physical acceptance Dynamic acceptance Linear lattice vacuum chamber known Nonlinear lattice separatrix unknown Longitudinal acceptance RF energy acceptance (bucket height) Lattice energy acceptance = δ-dependant horizontal acceptance Dynamic aperture = local projection of dynamic acceptance acceptance [mm mrad] aperture [mm] Design criterion: Dynamic acceptance > physical acceptance A.Streun, PSI 23

Acceptance Acceptance Lifetime Single particle processes exponential decay Interaction with residual gas nuclei: elastic scattering & bremsstrahlung Two particle processes (= space charge effects) hyperbolic decay Touschek effect (= intrabeam scattering) (Colliders: beam beam bremsstrahlung) 1/2 1/e hyperbolic exponential T=T=1 T el γ 2 A y P T bs δ 0.2 acc P T t γ3 σ s I sb ɛ xo g [δacc (s)] 2...3 β(s)... c A y = vertical acceptance, P = pressure, σ s = bunch length, I sb = bunch current δ acc = energy acceptance, ɛ xo = natural emittance, g = emittance ratio A.Streun, PSI 24

Acceptance Acceptance Injection TURN 0 TURN 1 Septum stored beam horizontal acceptance TURN 2 injected beam TURN 4 A.Streun, PSI 25

Acceptance Physical acceptance Linear lattice (quads and bends only): infinite dynamic acceptance Particle at acceptance limit A x : x(s) = A x β x (s) cos(φ(s)) + D(s) δ Particle loss: x(s) a x (s) somewhere. Acceptance ( (ax (s) D(s) δ ) 2 ) A x = min β x (s) ( ax (s) 2 ) A y = min β x (s) A x invariant of betatron motion. Projection: x max (s) = ± A x β x (s) + D(s) δ y max (s) = ± A y β y (s) A.Streun, PSI 26

Acceptance Dynamic acceptance Separatrix for stable motion (no physical limitations) stable test particle not lost in tracking sufficient number of turns: ( 1 damping time, 10 synchrotron oscillations) machine model for tracking: correct & complete & realistic Available aperture = dynamic aperture with physical limitations Dynamic aperture should be wider than beampipe have little distortions = careful balancing of sextupoles = set tolerances for magnets and IDs alignment and multipolar errors x physical dynamic combined x A.Streun, PSI 27

Acceptance Energy acceptance Horizontal acceptance A x = 0 for δ > min(a x (s)/ D(s) ) BUT: Scattering processes energy change of core particles: X = ( 0, 0, 0, 0, δ, 0) Betatron oscillation around dispersive orbit with amplitude A x A x = γ xo (D o δ) 2 + 2α xo (D o δ)(d oδ) + β xo (D oδ) 2 = H o δ 2 β xo := β x (s o ) etc., s o = location of scattering event! Maximum value of betatron oscillation: x(s) = ( ) A x β x (s) + D(s)δ = Ho β x (s) + D(s) δ A.Streun, PSI 28

Local energy acceptance: δ acc (s o ) = ± min Acceptance ( a x (s) Ho β x (s) + D(s) ) Energy acceptance for different lattice locations (a x (s) = a x ): In dispersionfree section: H o = 0 δ acc = ±a x /D max At location of maximum dispersion: H o = γ o D 2 max δ acc = ±a x /(2D max ) A.Streun, PSI 29

Acceptance Local energy acceptance and Touschek lifetime linear δ RF nonlinear (2 Sextupole Families) +δ δ +T T Test Lattice: ESRF standard cell (dispersionfree straight sections) δ acc = min{+δ Lattice acc, δ Lattice acc, δ RF acc} T t A.Streun, PSI 30

The real lattice Lattice Imperfections Magnet misalignments Closed Orbit distortion and correction BPMs and correctors Correlated misalignments: magnet girders and dynamic alignment concepts Ground waves and vibrations: orbit feedback Beam rotation and coupling control Multipolar errors (Magnets and Undulators): Dynamic acceptance Gradient errors: Beta-beat quadrupole current control = Stability requirements (photon beam on sample) < 1 µm A.Streun, PSI 31

Outlook Trends in lattice design reduce magnet gap Mini-gap undulators define acceptance anyway Example: 5 mm gap 2 m length, β y,max 25 m dipole chamber wall 3 mm dipole gap 25 mm (instead of > 40 mm). relax on flexibility progress in computing, engineering and manufacturing calculated optics will become reality! exploit J x 2 ɛ 1 2 ɛ, σ e 2σ e D = 0 in straights, vertical focussing in bends. try octupoles 1 st order attack of 2 nd order sextupole terms A.Streun, PSI 32