THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT

Similar documents
The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 7 11 May 2010

2.4 Root space decomposition

Cartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26

Representations of semisimple Lie algebras

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Introduction to Representations Theory of Lie Groups

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding

Lecture 10 - Representation Theory II: Heuristics

Classification of semisimple Lie algebras

Category O and its basic properties

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Lie Algebras. Shlomo Sternberg

A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM

Notes on Lie Algebras

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Lecture 11 The Radical and Semisimple Lie Algebras

2-STEP NILPOTENT LIE GROUPS ARISING FROM SEMISIMPLE MODULES

LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

LIE ALGEBRAS AND ADO S THEOREM

THE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C)

A 2 G 2 A 1 A 1. (3) A double edge pointing from α i to α j if α i, α j are not perpendicular and α i 2 = 2 α j 2

Kac-Moody Algebras. Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010

The Gelfand-Tsetlin Basis (Too Many Direct Sums, and Also a Graph)

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

On the Universal Enveloping Algebra: Including the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt Theorem

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

Topics in Representation Theory: SU(n), Weyl Chambers and the Diagram of a Group

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

4. Killing form, root space inner product, and commutation relations * version 1.5 *

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 10.

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003

Weyl s Character Formula for Representations of Semisimple Lie Algebras

Root Systems Lie Algebras. Their Representations.

IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS. Contents

AND AFFINE ROOT SYSTEMS

The Lusztig-Vogan Bijection in the Case of the Trivial Representation

Decay to zero of matrix coefficients at Adjoint infinity by Scot Adams

e j = Ad(f i ) 1 2a ij/a ii

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

A Structure Theorem for Plesken Lie Algebras over Finite Fields

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 3 6 April 2010

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

ON k-abelian p-filiform LIE ALGEBRAS I. 1. Generalities

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

Topology in Physics. Proseminar in Theoretical Physics. Institut für theoretische Physik ETH Hönggerberg CH-8093 Zürich Switzerland

Group Theory - QMII 2017

THE JORDAN-CHEVALLEY DECOMPOSITION

Graded modules over classical simple Lie algebras

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

Lie Algebras of Finite and Affine Type

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

Simple Lie subalgebras of locally nite associative algebras

LIE ALGEBRA PREDERIVATIONS AND STRONGLY NILPOTENT LIE ALGEBRAS

ALUTHGE ITERATION IN SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUP. 1. Introduction Given 0 < λ < 1, the λ-aluthge transform of X C n n [4]:

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.

Root systems. S. Viswanath

Lie and Kac-Moody algebras

Connecting Coinvariants

Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights

Classification and Identification of Lie Algebras

Realization of locally extended affine Lie algebras of type A 1

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

AN UPPER BOUND FOR SIGNATURES OF IRREDUCIBLE, SELF-DUAL gl(n, C)-REPRESENTATIONS

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

Homework #05, due 2/17/10 = , , , , , Additional problems recommended for study: , , 10.2.

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Seminar on Motives Standard Conjectures

A Leibniz Algebra Structure on the Second Tensor Power

MATH 223A NOTES 2011 LIE ALGEBRAS 35

Lie algebra cohomology

Math 210C. The representation ring

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

3 Universal enveloping algebras

THE TATE MODULE. Seminar: Elliptic curves and the Weil conjecture. Yassin Mousa. Z p

Group Gradings on Finite Dimensional Lie Algebras

On the Conjugacy Theorems of Cartan and Borel Subalgebras. Mary Clair Thompson

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT

10. Cartan Weyl basis

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

Transcription:

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT ANKE D. POHL Abstract. Incomplete notes of the talk in the IRTG Student Seminar 07.06.06. This is a draft version and thought for internal use only. The Theorem of the Highest Weight states that the equivalence classes of irreducible finite-dimensional representations of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g can be characterized by their highest weight. Moreover, it tells that the set of highest weight are identical with the set of dominant algebraically integral functionals on a Cartan subalgebra of g. In the first section we collect the definitions and propositions we need for the statement and (partial) proof of the Theorem of the Highest Weight. The omission of proofs does not mean that these are trivial. All proofs can be found in the book [Kna02] on which all of the talk is heavily based. The second section contains a statement of the Theorem of the Highest Weight. We will prove the stated properties of the highest weight and that the correspondence is injective. The proof of the surjectivity of the correspondence is very long hard work and can be found in [Kna02]. 1. Preliminaries A complex Lie algebra g is a complex algebra such that the C-bilinear product [, ]: g g g satisfies the following two properties for all X, Y, Z g (a) antisymmetry: [X, Y ] = [Y, X], (b) Jacobi identity: [X, [Y, Z]] + [Y, [Z, X]] + [Z, [Y, X]] = 0. Note that the antisymmetry implies that g is abelian if and only if [X, Y ] = 0 for all X, Y g. If V is a complex vector space, then End C (V ) endowed with the product [X, Y ] := X Y Y X is a complex Lie algebra. In what follows, g will always denote a complex Lie algebra and V a complex vector space. A representation π of g on V is a Lie algebra homomorphism π : g End C (V ). An invariant subspace for such a representation is a vector subspace U of V such that π(g)u U. A representation is called irreducible if the only invariant subspaces are 0 and V. 1

2 A. POHL Let π be a representation of g on V, and π a representation of g on V. Then π and π are called equivalent if there is a vector space isomorphism E : V V such that E π(x) = π (X) E for all X g. The equivalence classes of irreducible finite-dimensional representations of g are denoted by ĝ fin. We need to define three subclasses of Lie algebras: the solvable, the semisimple and the nilpotent ones. If a and b are subsets of g, then [a, b] := {[X, Y ] X a, Y b} denotes the Lie subalgebra of g spanned by the elements [X, Y ]. For n N we define g 0 := g and g n+1 := [g n, g n ]. The commutator series of g is the series g 0 g 1 g 2.... If there is an n N 0 such that g n = 0, then g is called solvable. The radical rad g is the largest solvable ideal in g, its existence can be proved for each Lie algebra g (cf. [Kna02, Prop 1.12]). Finally, g is called semisimple, if g has no nonzero solvable ideals, that is to say, rad g = 0. Next we define for n N the ideals g 0 := g and g n+1 := [g, g n ]. The series g 0 g 1 g 2... is called the lower central series for g. If there is an n N 0 such that g n = 0, then g is called nilpotent. Recall that the (infinitesimal) adjoint representation ad g : g End C (g) is a representation of g on itself. Proposition 1.1 ([Kna02, Prop 2.5]). Let g be a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra and h a nilpotent Lie subalgebra. For α h = L(h, C) define Then we have g α := {X g H h n N: (ad g H α(h)1) n X = 0}. (a) g = α h g α, (b) h g 0, (c) [g α, g β ] g α+β. If g α 0, then g α is called a generalized weight space of g relative to ad g h. The item (c) shows that g 0 is a subalgebra. A nilpotent Lie subalgebra h of g is called a Cartan subalgebra if h = g 0. Of special importance is the next proposition. In general, for an infinitedimensional or real Lie algebra a Cartan subalgebra does not exist. Proposition 1.2 ([Kna02, Thm 2.9, Thm 2.15]). Any finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra g has a Cartan subalgebra, and this is unique up to (inner) automorphism.

THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT 3 If h is a Cartan subalgebra of g, then the generalized weight spaces of Proposition 1.1 are called root spaces, the nonzero weights are called roots, and = (g, h) denotes the (finite) set of roots. The decomposition g = h α g α is known as the root-space decomposition of g with respect to h. Elements of g α are called root vectors for the root α. If g is semisimple, then a Cartan subalgebra has special properties and the root spaces have a simple form. Proposition 1.3 ([Kna02, Prop 2.10, Prop 2.13, Cor 2.23, Prop 2.21]). Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra and h a Cartan subalgebra. Then h is abelian and ad g (h) is simultaneously diagonable. For each α, the root space g α is one-dimensional and g α = {X g H h: ad(h)x = α(h)x}. From now on let g be a complex semisimple finite-dimensional Lie algebra and h a Cartan subalgebra. Let π be a representation of g on V. For λ h = L(h, C) (complex linear functionals) we put V λ := {v V H h n N: (π(h) λ(h)1) n v = 0}. If V λ 0, then V λ is called a generalized weight space, the elements of V λ are called generalized weight vectors, and λ is a weight. The weight space belonging to a weight λ is {v V H h: π(h)v = λ(h)v}, which is obviously a subspace of V λ. Elements of the weight space are called weight vectors. For X, Y g we define B(X, Y ) := Tr(ad X ad Y ). Then B is a symmetric bilinear form on g which is called the Killing form. It has a couple of properties of which the following is important for us. Proposition 1.4 ([Kna02, Prop 2.17]). B h h is nondegenerate. Therefore to each element α h corresponds a unique H α h such that α(h) = B(H, H α ) for all H h. The Killing form B allows to define a dual bilinear form on h via ϕ, ψ := B(H ϕ, H ψ ) for ϕ, ψ h. A real Lie algebra g 0 is said to be a real form of g if g = g 0 ig 0 as real vector spaces. The next proposition tells us how to construct a real Lie algebra h 0 that is a real form of h such that h 0 = L(h 0, R) (real linear

4 A. POHL functionals) is the real form of h on which all the roots are real valued. The proof uses special properties of the Killing form. Proposition 1.5 ([Kna02, Cor 2.38]). Let W be the R linear span of in h. Then W is a real form of the vector space h, and the restriction of the bilinear form to W W is a positive-definite inner product. Moreover, if h 0 denotes the R linear span of all H α for α, then h 0 is a real form of the vector space h, the members of W are exactly those linear functionals that are real on h 0, and restriction of the operation of those linear functionals from h to h 0 is an R isomorphism of W onto h 0. Note that the previous proposition shows that the Killing form is positive definite on h 0. Three notions are absolutely important in the Theorem of Highest Weight. The first is, of course, highest weight which is defined via a total ordering on h 0. The second is algebraically integral functional, and the third is dominant functional. In fact, the Theorem of Highest Weight states (among more important things) that the highest weight is an algebraically integral dominant weight, and viceversa that every algebraically integral dominant weight occurs as a highest weight. An element λ of h is called algebraically integral if 2 λ, α / α 2 is an integer for each α. Total ordering on h 0 : The aim is to define a subset of h 0 to be the set of positive elements such that the notion of positivity on h 0 meets the following two properties: (P1) For each nonzero ϕ h 0, exactly one of ϕ and ϕ is positive, (P2) the sum of positive elements is positive, and any positive multiple of a positive element is positive. Then we define that ϕ > ψ or ψ < ϕ if ϕ ψ is positive. This way a total ordering of h 0 is established. If α h 0 is a root, it is called simple if α > 0 and if α does not decompose as α = β 1 + β 2 where β 1, β 2 are both positive roots. The set of positive roots is denoted +, and the subset of simple roots is denoted Π. An element λ of h is called dominant if λ, α 0 for all α +. One way to define such a notion of positivity is via a lexicographic ordering. One fixes a finite spanning set H 1,..., H m of h 0 as (real) vector space, e.g. a basis, and endows it with a total ordering, here 1,..., m. Then one defines ϕ h 0 to be positive if there exists a k {1,..., m} such that ϕ(h i ) = 0 for 1 i k 1 and ϕ(h k ) > 0. Proposition 1.8 states that each weight can be regarded as an element of h 0. The largest weight w.r.t. to the introduced ordering of h 0 is called the highest weight. Hence, a priori, the notion of highest weight heavily depends on the ordering.

THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT 5 Proposition 1.6 ([Kna02, Prop 2.49]). If l = dim R h 0, then there are l simple roots α 1,..., α l, and they are linearly independent. If β is a root and is written as β = x 1 α 1 + + x l α l, then all the x j have the same sign (0 is considered to be positive or negative, as needed), and all the x j are integers. The proof that each highest weight is dominant is based on the fact that g is spanned by embedded copies of sl(2, C). The Lie algebra sl(2, C) is generated by the vector space basis ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 0 0 1 0 0 h =, e =, f = 0 1 0 0 1 0 as a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra End C (C 2 ). The bracket relations are [h, e] = 2e, [h, f] = 2f, [e, f] = h. Let α be a root and let H α h be the vector defined in Proposition 1.4. Select nonzero elements E α g α and E α g α. Then [Kna02, Cor 2.25] states that the pair {E α, E α } can (and should) be normalized such that B(E α, E α ) = 1. If we set H α := 2 α(h α ) H α, E α := 2 α(h α ) E α, E α := E α, then we have the bracket relations [H α, E α] = 2E α, [H α, E α] = 2E α, [E α, E α] = H α. Hence {H α, E α, E α} spans a Lie aubalgebra sl α of g isomorphic to sl(2, C). The next proposition will guarantee that each highest weight is dominant. Proposition 1.7 ([Kna02, Cor 1.72]). Let π be a complex-linear representation of sl(2, C) on a finite-dimensional complex vector space V. Then π(h) is diagonable, all its eigenvalues are integers, and the multiplicity of an eigenvalue k equals the multiplicity of k. The following proposition is crucial in the proof of the Theorem of the Highest Weight. Proposition 1.8 ([Kna02, Prop 5.4]). Let h 0 be the real form of h. If π is a representation of g on the finite-dimensional complex vector space V, then (a) π(h) acts diagonably on V, so that every generalized weight vector is a weight vector and V is the direct sum of all the weight spaces, (b) every weight is real valued on h 0 and is algebraically integral, (c) roots and weights are related by π(g α )V λ V λ+α and π(h)v λ V λ. The universal enveloping algebra allows to extend a representation ϕ: g End C (V ) uniquely to a homomorphism of algebras U(g) End C (V ). This extension is the right framework for investigations on iterated actions of g on V.

6 A. POHL Proposition 1.9 ([Kna02, Prop 3.3, Remarks 2)]). Let g be a complex Lie algebra. There is a pair (U(g), ι) such that U(g) is an associative complex algebra with unit and ι: g U(g) is a linear mapping satisfying ι[x, Y ] = ι(x)ι(y ) ι(y )ι(x) for all X, Y g such that (U(g), ι) meets the following universal property: Whenever A is an associative complex algebra with unit and π : g A is a linear mapping satisfying π[x, Y ] = π(x)π(y ) π(y )π(x) for all X, Y g then there exists a unique algebra homomorphism π : U(g) A such that π(1) = 1 and the diagram commutes. U(g) ι g π As usual, one proves that U(g) is unique up to isomorphism and that ι is injective, therefore we will identify X and ι(x) for each X g. The algebra U(g) is called the universal enveloping algebra of g. The Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt Theorem gives a vector space basis for U(g). Proposition 1.10 (Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt, [Kna02, Thm 3.8]). Let {X i } i A be a basis of g, and suppose a total ordering has been imposed on the index set A. Then the set of all monomials π X j 1 i 1 X jn i n, where i 1 < < i n and all j k 0, is a basis of U(g). The following version of Schur s Lemma is needed in the proof that the correspondence that is stated in the Theorem of the Highest Weight is injective. Proposition 1.11 (Schur s Lemma, [Kna02, Prop 5.1]). Suppose ϕ and ϕ are irreducible representations of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra g on finite-dimensional vector spaces V and V, resp. If L: V V is a linear map such that ϕ (X)L = Lϕ(X) for all X g, then L is bijective or L = 0. A 2. The Theorem of the Highest Weight Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra, let h be a Cartan subalgebra, let = (g, h) be the set of roots, and let W ( ) be the Weyl group. Let B be the Killing form of g and let h 0 be the real form of h on which all the roots are real valued. Introduce an ordering in h 0. Let Π denote the resulting set of simple roots, and + that one of positive roots.

THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT 7 Theorem 2.1 (Theorem of the Highest Weight (algebraic), [Kna02, Thm 5.5]). The map ĝ fin {dominant algebraically integral linear functionals on h} [π] highest weight of π is a bijective correspondence. The highest weight λ of π λ has the additional properties: (a) λ depends only on the simple system Π and not on the ordering used to define Π, (b) the weight space V λ for λ is one-dimensional, (c) each root vector E α for arbitrary α + annihilates the members of V λ, and the members of V λ are the only vectors with this property, (d) every weight of π is of the form λ l i=1 n iα i with the integers n i 0 and the α i Π. References [Kna02] Anthony W. Knapp, Lie groups beyond an introduction, second ed., Progress in Mathematics, vol. 140, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 2002.