Big Wood River. General Information

Similar documents
Squaw Creek. General Information

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

5/4/2017 Fountain Creek. Gage Analysis. Homework 6. Clifton, Cundiff, Pour, Queen, and Zey CIVE 717

Sediment Transport Analysis for Stream Restoration Design: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

Hannah Moore CEE Juvenile Bull Trout Distribution in the South Fork Walla Walla River, Oregon

APPENDIX A. Watershed Delineation and Stream Network Defined from WMS

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

Remaining Capacity in Great Lakes Reservoirs

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix J. Vermont Regional Hydraulic Geometry Curves

Gravel Transport Study Report for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

StreamStats: Delivering Streamflow Information to the Public. By Kernell Ries

THE CASPAR CREEK EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED. Thomas Lisle, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Arcata, Califorina

DRAFT LOW FLOW CONVEYANCE CHANNEL BORAMEP TOTAL LOAD ANALYSIS 2001 MIDDLE RIO GRANDE, NEW MEXICO MAY 2005

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Quiz Fall There are 5 questions on this exam. Please do all 5. They are of equal credit.

The Yellow River Initiative: The Birth of a System Approach to Challenges Facing the Everglades of the North

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

ESTIMATING JOINT FLOW PROBABILITIES AT STREAM CONFLUENCES USING COPULAS

Natural Variability in Annual Maximum Water Level and Outflow of Yellowstone Lake

Nitrate and Phosphate A Loaded Question in Illinois

Chehalis Basin Strategy

Two-Stage Channel Design

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District. Sediment Trap Assessment Saginaw River, Michigan

Illinois State Water Survey Division

SELBY CREEK STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION AND RIPARIAN REVEGETATION PROJECT: GEOMORPHIC ANALYSIS AND REVIEW

Diego Burgos. Geology 394. Advisors: Dr. Prestegaard. Phillip Goodling

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

Impacts of Upstream Disturbances on Downstream Sediment Yield and Morphology in the Presence of Best Management Practices

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Stream Classification

What discharge (cfs) is required to entrain the D 84 (84 th percentile of sediment size distribution) in Red Canyon Wash?

USING A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM TO PREDICT FLOW DURATION CURVES AT UNGAGED STREAM SITES IN GUAM

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Geomorphology Studies

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

Water flowing in the stream can move sediments along the stream channel because of an exchange of energy from the

YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY

Quantification of Bed-Load Transport on the Upper Mississippi River Using Multibeam Survey Data and Traditional Methods

Each basin is surrounded & defined by a drainage divide (high point from which water flows away) Channel initiation

Illinois Benchmark Network Instream Suspended Sediment Monitoring Program, Water Year 1986

Landscape Development

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No )


Henrys Fork Island Park Caldera Reach Evaluation: Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Sediment Transport

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Exploring the role of channel processes and legacy sediment in nutrient and sediment delivery, Upper Pecatonica River, Wisconsin

Sediment Characteristics of Northwestern

Lower Susquehanna River Integrated Sediment & Nutrient Monitoring Program

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

HEC-RAS Reservoir Transport Simulation of Three Reservoirs in the Lower Susquehanna River Basin. Mike Langland and Ed Koerkle

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

An Adaptive Assessment of the Flushing Flow Needs of the Lower Poudre River, Colorado: First Evaluation

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Platte River Flow and Sediment Transport Between North Platte and Grand Island, Nebraska ( )

Assessment of the Hood River Delta Hood River, Oregon

N 2 3. Lake Huron. St. Clair River. Black River Assessment. Figure 1. Major tributaries to the Black River. 1. Berry Drain 2. Elk Creek.

Introducing Iowa StreamStats Version 4, a Redesign of the USGS Application for Estimating Streamflow Stats

The Use of Synthetic Floods for Defining the Regulated Volume Duration Frequency Curves for the Red River at Fargo, ND

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Technical Memorandum No RAINFALL

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Lake Tahoe Watershed Model. Lessons Learned through the Model Development Process

Valenciano Reservoir Safe Yield Study. Prepared by: CSA Architects & Engineers, LLP

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Modeling the Effects of Climate and Land Cover Change in the Stoney Brook Subbasin of the St. Louis River Watershed

High-Gradient Streams

Simulating Sediment Transport in the Patapsco River following Dam Removal with Dam Removal Express Assessment Model-1 (DREAM-1)

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

Dolores River Watershed Study

Dynamics of Sediment Transport in the Mississippi River Basin: A Temporal Scaling Analysis

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Appendix D. Model Setup, Calibration, and Validation

Objectives: After completing this assignment, you should be able to:

Application of a Site-Calibrated Parker-Klingeman Bedload Transport Model Little Granite Creek, Wyoming

Topographic Maps. More than a Road Map

Monitoring for Sediment. Sampling Methods and Equipment

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

MEANDER MIGRATION MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR THE JANUARY 2005 STORM, WHITMAN PROPERTY, SAN ANTONIO CREEK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Minnesota River Turbidity Stakeholder Committee New Ulm Library, August 27, 20090

Introduction Fluvial Processes in Small Southeastern Watersheds

Transcription:

General Information The flows out of the southern portion of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area in central Idaho. The study reach is about a,200 ft length of river about.5 miles upstream from the discontinued Geological Survey (USGS) gage 335500 ( near Ketchum) in the Sawtooth National Forest. The site is approximately 9 miles upstream of Ketchum, Idaho near the Wood River campground on land administered by the Forest Service. The elevation of the site is about 6,380 ft and the drainage area is 37.5 mi 2 (above the USGS gage). The geology of the watershed is predominantly mixed volcanic. Figure. at bridge sampling location.

In 999 and 2000 personnel of Utah State University measured sediment transport and instantaneous streamflow at this site (Figure ). Additional information collected at this site include a survey of the stream reach, pebble counts of the substrate surface and core samples of the substrate subsurface material. Streamflow records for complete water years are available for this site 949 through 97. The minimum and maximum daily mean discharge for the period of record are 5 ft 3 /s and,5 ft 3 /s, respectively. Estimated average annual streamflow (Q a ) is 67 ft 3 /s and the estimated.5 year return interval discharge (Q.5 ) is 772 ft 3 /s. The maximum discharge recorded was,690 ft 3 /s on May 24, 967. Cross-Section Figure 2 shows the cross-section at the sediment transport measurement site at the bridge shown in Figure. The average gradient for the study reach is 0.009 ft/ft. Elevation, ft 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 - -2 Q.5 Q a -5 0 5 5 20 25 30 35 40 45 Distance, ft Figure 2. Cross-section of at the sediment transport measurement site.

Channel Geometry The channel geometry relationships for this cross-section are shown in Figure 3. All data collected by USU personnel in 999 and 2000 were used to develop the displayed power relationships with discharge. Width is constant at this bridge location over the measured range of discharge. Over the range of discharges when sediment transport was measured (23 to,090 ft 3 /s) estimated average depth and estimated average velocity varied from.36 to 3.60 ft, and 3.7 to 7.2 ft/s, respectively. The average reach gradient is 0.009 ft/ft. 0 Average Velocity y = 0.432x 0.403 R 2 = 0.92 Top Width y = 4.85 Width and Depth, ft Average Velocity, ft/s Average Depth y = 0.055x 0.597 R 2 = 0.96 0 00 000 Discharge, ft 3 /s Figure 3. Width, average depth and average velocity versus stream discharge at the measurement cross section on the.

Channel Material A pebble counts were made along three transects in the study reach and three cores of surface and subsurface material were collected, one at each transect in July 2000. The D 50 and D 90 for the combined pebble counts were 9 mm and 353 mm, respectively (Figure 4). The D 50 and D 90 for the combined subsurface cores were 25 mm and 52 mm, respectively, and for the combined surface cores were 55 mm and 2 mm, respectively. 0 90 80 70 Percent Finer 60 50 40 30 20 2000 Pebble Counts 2000 Subsurface Cores 2000 Surface Cores 0 0. 0 00 000 Particle Size, mm Figure 4. Particle size distribution for surface and subsurface material samples in the.

Sediment Transport Sediment transport measurements made in 999 and 2000 includes 0 measurements of bedload transport and 26 measurements of suspended sediment transport. Sediment transport measurements spanned a range of stream discharges from 23 ft 3 /s (.28Q a ; 0.28Q.5 ) to,090 ft 3 /s (6.53Q a ;.4Q.5 ). Bedload transport ranged from 0.0462 to 37 t/d and suspended transport ranged from 26.0 to,400 t/d. Over the range of discharges when both bedload and suspended load transport rates were measured, suspended transport accounts for the majority of the material in transport with over an order of magnitude greater suspended transport than bedload transport at the lower discharges and about six times as much at the highest discharge (Figure 5). 000 Sediment Transport, tons/day 00 0 Suspended y = 4.650E-07x 2.982 R 2 = 0.82 BCF=.2 Total Bedload y =.534E-09x 3.540 R 2 = 0.87 BCF=.300 Q a Q.5 Suspended Total Bedload 0. 0 00 000 Discharge, ft 3 /s Figure 5. Bedload and suspended load transport rate versus discharge.

The bedload transport rates by size class (Figure 6) shows that the larger rates are usually associated with material in the 0.5 to 2mm diameter size class. 00 0 <0.5mm y = 2.225E-09x 3.08 R 2 = 0.92 Bedload Rate, tons/day <0.5mm 0.5-2mm 2-8mm 8-32mm >32mm 0.5-2mm y = 5.283E-09x 3.26 R 2 = 0.89 2-8mm y =.457E-x 3.680 R 2 = 0.84 8-32mm y =.486E-2x 4.3 R 2 = 0.72 0. >32mm y =.804E-04x.55 R 2 = 0.37 Q a Q.5 0.0 0 00 000 Discharge, ft 3/ s Figure 6. Bedload transport rate versus discharge for selected size classes.

The size of the largest particle in the bedload sample increased with discharge (Figure 7). The largest particle measured in a bedload sample was 79 mm at a discharge of,000 ft 3 /s. At discharges greater than the.5 year return interval discharge (772 ft 3 /s) the largest particle always exceeded 22 mm. There is also a trend of increasing median size of the bedload sample with increasing discharge. The D 50 for most of the bedload samples collected at discharges less than the.5 year return interval discharge were in the sand size, 0.5 to 2.0 mm. The information on the largest particle in the bedload sample suggests that discharges somewhat larger than the.5-year return interval discharge are capable of moving the median diameter particles on the channel surface. 00 near Ketchum Bedload Size, mm 0 D 50 for three surface pebble counts D 50 for three subsurface cores R 2 = 0.63 R 2 = 0.08 0. Median Size Largest Particle Q a Q.5 0 00 000 Discharge, ft 3 /s Figure 7. Median size of the bedload sample and the largest particle size versus stream discharge for the.