Solvable Lie groups and the shear construction

Similar documents
Multi-moment maps. CP 3 Journal Club. Thomas Bruun Madsen. 20th November 2009

ELEMENTARY DEFORMATIONS AND THE HYPERKAEHLER / QUATERNIONIC KAEHLER CORRESPONDENCE

The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

NilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions

Conification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergr

On the holonomy fibration

Elementary Deformations HK/QK. Oscar MACIA. Introduction [0] Physics [8] Twist [20] Example [42]

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

Torus actions and Ricci-flat metrics

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

H-projective structures and their applications

Flat complex connections with torsion of type (1, 1)

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Complex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let

Manifolds with holonomy. Sp(n)Sp(1) SC in SHGAP Simon Salamon Stony Brook, 9 Sep 2016

and the diagram commutes, which means that every fibre E p is mapped to {p} V.

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

Contact pairs (bicontact manifolds)

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Quaternionic Complexes

LIE ALGEBROIDS AND POISSON GEOMETRY, OLIVETTI SEMINAR NOTES

Poisson geometry of b-manifolds. Eva Miranda

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Structure theorems for compact Kähler manifolds

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy

LOOP GROUPS AND CATEGORIFIED GEOMETRY. Notes for talk at Streetfest. (joint work with John Baez, Alissa Crans and Urs Schreiber)

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona. (joint with Victor Guillemin and Ana Rita Pires) Zaragoza, February

TRANSITIVE HOLONOMY GROUP AND RIGIDITY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE. Luis Guijarro and Gerard Walschap

Riemannian submersions and eigenforms of the Witten Laplacian

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

Geometry 9: Serre-Swan theorem

Metrics and Holonomy

MATH 263: PROBLEM SET 1: BUNDLES, SHEAVES AND HODGE THEORY

Geometria Simplettica e metriche Hermitiane speciali

Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy

Dolbeault cohomology and. stability of abelian complex structures. on nilmanifolds

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.

Riemannian and Sub-Riemannian Geodesic Flows

Notes on the geometry of Lagrangian torus fibrations

COTANGENT MODELS FOR INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

Moment Maps and Toric Special Holonomy

Lecture 6: Principal bundles

HAMILTONIAN ACTIONS IN GENERALIZED COMPLEX GEOMETRY

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

Action-angle coordinates and geometric quantization. Eva Miranda. Barcelona (EPSEB,UPC) STS Integrable Systems

THE MODULI SPACE OF TRANSVERSE CALABI YAU STRUCTURES ON FOLIATED MANIFOLDS

Lecture 5. vector bundles, gauge theory

Groupoid Representation Theory

COMPUTING THE POISSON COHOMOLOGY OF A B-POISSON MANIFOLD

Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour

joint work with A. Fino, M. Macrì, G. Ovando, M. Subils Rosario (Argentina) July 2012 Sergio Console Dipartimento di Matematica Università di Torino

Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

Transverse geometry. consisting of finite sums of monomials of the form

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

12 Geometric quantization

A Joint Adventure in Sasakian and Kähler Geometry

Quantising proper actions on Spin c -manifolds

An Introduction to the Stolz-Teichner Program

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND THE QUATERNIONS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) The Chern Lectures Berkeley April 9th-18th 2013

Tangent bundles, vector fields

Connections for noncommutative tori

CONNECTIONS ON PRINCIPAL BUNDLES AND CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM

ALF spaces and collapsing Ricci-flat metrics on the K3 surface

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

Holomorphic line bundles

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

The Strominger Yau Zaslow conjecture

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Integrability and Associativity

Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

NOTES ON FORMAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND JET BUNDLES

ALF spaces and collapsing Ricci-flat metrics on the K3 surface

Extended Space for. Falk Hassler. bases on. arxiv: and in collaboration with. Pascal du Bosque and Dieter Lüst

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Poisson 2012 Utrecht. August 2nd 2012

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

The generally covariant locality principle and an extension to gauge symmetries

L6: Almost complex structures

Adiabatic limits of co-associative Kovalev-Lefschetz fibrations

Transcription:

Solvable Lie groups and the shear construction Marco Freibert jt. with Andrew Swann Mathematisches Seminar, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel 19.05.2016

1 Swann s twist 2 The shear construction The left-invariant shear The shear in general 3 Examples 4 Summary and Outlook

Setting of the twist Double fibration picture: Two principal A-bundles (A connected Abelian Lie group) P π π W M < A =AP A M =A > W endowed with a principal A P = A-connection 1-form θ Ω 1 (P, a P ) of π such that (i) the principal actions commute and (ii) H := ker θ is a connection also for π W. Call α Ω k M, α W Ω k W H-related (α H α W ) iff π α H = π W α W H. H for arb. tensor fields using T π(p) M H p T πw (p)w.

Setting of the twist Double fibration picture: Two principal A-bundles (A connected Abelian Lie group) P π π W M < A =AP A M =A > W endowed with a principal A P = A-connection 1-form θ Ω 1 (P, a P ) of π such that (i) the principal actions commute and (ii) H := ker θ is a connection also for π W. Call α Ω k M, α W Ω k W H-related (α H α W ) iff π α H = π W α W H. H for arb. tensor fields using T π(p) M H p T πw (p)w.

Pushing data down to M Idea: Construct W, θ, P from twist data on M. Twist data + properties of α Ω k M determine properties of H-related α W Ω k W. We have W = P/A M for the principal A M = A-action of πw. Induced curvature form ω Ω 2 (M, a P ) on M. A M -action on P descends to A M action on M. ξ a M X(P) inf. princ. action of πw is lift of induced inf. ξ action a M X(M) and (i) and (ii) from last slide L ξ θ = 0. (if ξ(a M ) ker θ = TP)

Pushing data down to M Idea: Construct W, θ, P from twist data on M. Twist data + properties of α Ω k M determine properties of H-related α W Ω k W. We have W = P/A M for the principal A M = A-action of πw. Induced curvature form ω Ω 2 (M, a P ) on M. A M -action on P descends to A M action on M. ξ a M X(P) inf. princ. action of πw is lift of induced inf. ξ action a M X(M) and (i) and (ii) from last slide L ξ θ = 0. (if ξ(a M ) ker θ = TP)

Lifting Abelian actions Proposition (Swann) An A M -action on M lifts to R n -action on P preserving θ iff (i) a C (M, a P a M ) with da = ξ ω and (ii) ξ ω = 0.

Lifting Abelian actions Proposition (Swann) An A M -action on M lifts to R n -action on P preserving θ iff (i) a C (M, a P a M ) with da = ξ ω and (ii) ξ ω = 0. Then L ξ ω = 0 and ξ = ξ + ρ π a with ξ : a M X(P) horizontal lift of ξ, ρ : a P X(P) inf. princ. A P -action of π.

Lifting Abelian actions Proposition (Swann) An A M -action on M lifts to R n -action on P preserving θ iff (i) a C (M, a P a M ) with da = ξ ω and (ii) ξ ω = 0. Then L ξ ω = 0 and ξ = ξ + ρ π a with ξ : a M X(P) horizontal lift of ξ, ρ : a P X(P) inf. princ. A P -action of π. Definition We call (a, ξ, ω) C (M, a P a M ) X(M) a M Ω2 (M, a P ) with invertible a fulfilling dω = 0 and (i) and (ii) from above twist data on M and W := P/ ξ(a M ) the twist of (M, a, ξ, F ) if smooth.

Some results If A M = T n and ω has integral periods, one can construct principal T n -bundle P and lift A M = T n -action on M to a T n -action on P preserving princ. conn. θ with curv. ω. For α Ω k M (!)α W Ω k W with α H α W L ξ α = 0. If this is the case, then: dα ( ξ a 1 α ) ω H d W α W. Differential on W equals twisted differential d ξ a 1 ω on M. Twist is invertible.

Some results If A M = T n and ω has integral periods, one can construct principal T n -bundle P and lift A M = T n -action on M to a T n -action on P preserving princ. conn. θ with curv. ω. For α Ω k M (!)α W Ω k W with α H α W L ξ α = 0. If this is the case, then: dα ( ξ a 1 α ) ω H d W α W. Differential on W equals twisted differential d ξ a 1 ω on M. Twist is invertible.

Examples HKT/SKT twists which are not hyperkähler/kähler from easy hyperkähler/kähler manifolds. E.g. HKT metrics on torus bundles over K3-surfaces Σ by twisting Σ T 4k with T 4k acting on right factor as usual (Swann). Twists of certain hyperkähler manifolds (after elementary deformations ) to hyperkähler manifolds (generalizing hyperkähler modifications) (Swann) quaternionic Kähler manifolds (reinterpretation and uniqueness of hk/qk correspondence of Haydys) (Maciá, Swann) Any compact nilmanifold by several twists from T n, see next slide.

The left-invariant twist G := M, P, H := W Lie groups, etc., (a, ξ, F ) left-invariant twist data ξ : a G g LA hom., a const., ω Λ 2 g a P closed with ξ ω = da = 0. Want to be able to twist every left-invariant form L ξ α = 0 α g ξ(a G ) is a central ideal in g. a P = ρ(a P ) p g is a central extension determined by ω and ξ(a G ) p h is a central extension as well.

The left-invariant twist G := M, P, H := W Lie groups, etc., (a, ξ, F ) left-invariant twist data ξ : a G g LA hom., a const., ω Λ 2 g a P closed with ξ ω = da = 0. Want to be able to twist every left-invariant form L ξ α = 0 α g ξ(a G ) is a central ideal in g. a P = ρ(a P ) p g is a central extension determined by ω and ξ(a G ) p h is a central extension as well. n nilpotent LA with LCS n = n 0, n 1,..., n r = {0} a := n r 1 central and n can be twisted to n/a a as LAs. n can be transformed to R N by r 1 successive twists.

The left-invariant twist G := M, P, H := W Lie groups, etc., (a, ξ, F ) left-invariant twist data ξ : a G g LA hom., a const., ω Λ 2 g a P closed with ξ ω = da = 0. Want to be able to twist every left-invariant form L ξ α = 0 α g ξ(a G ) is a central ideal in g. a P = ρ(a P ) p g is a central extension determined by ω and ξ(a G ) p h is a central extension as well. n nilpotent LA with LCS n = n 0, n 1,..., n r = {0} a := n r 1 central and n can be twisted to n/a a as LAs. n can be transformed to R N by r 1 successive twists.

The left-invariant shear Generalizing the twist Problem: Find a generalization such that all 1-connected solvable Lie groups can be obtained from R n, such that the space of invariant forms is not that restrictive (e.g., if g LA and X g not central α g with L X α 0) and such that the set of shear data is more general (e.g. dω 0 or ξ ω = 0 does not imply a constant).

The left-invariant shear Generalizing the twist Problem: Find a generalization such that all 1-connected solvable Lie groups can be obtained from R n, such that the space of invariant forms is not that restrictive (e.g., if g LA and X g not central α g with L X α 0) and such that the set of shear data is more general (e.g. dω 0 or ξ ω = 0 does not imply a constant). Solution in the left-invariant case: Consider arbitrary Abelian ideals/extensions instead of only central ones.

The left-invariant shear Abelian extensions An Abelian extension a P p g is determined by ω Λ 2 g a P, η g gl(a P ) with dω = η ω and η being a representation of g on a P. Reinterpretation of the data: η defines a flat connection on the trivial vector bundle F := G a P ω Ω 2 (G, F ) and dω = η ω is equivalent to d ω = 0. Using p = a P g as vector spaces, let θ : p a P p be the projection. Then θ Ω 1 (P, π F ) with d θ = π ω.

The left-invariant shear Abelian extensions An Abelian extension a P p g is determined by ω Λ 2 g a P, η g gl(a P ) with dω = η ω and η being a representation of g on a P. Reinterpretation of the data: η defines a flat connection on the trivial vector bundle F := G a P ω Ω 2 (G, F ) and dω = η ω is equivalent to d ω = 0. Using p = a P g as vector spaces, let θ : p a P p be the projection. Then θ Ω 1 (P, π F ) with d θ = π ω.

The left-invariant shear Lifting LA homomorphisms Given ξ : a G g injective LA homomorphism, make ansatz ξ = ξ + ρ a : a G p with a : a G a P, ρ : a P p. Question: When is ξ(a G ) an Abelian ideal in p?

The left-invariant shear Lifting LA homomorphisms Given ξ : a G g injective LA homomorphism, make ansatz ξ = ξ + ρ a : a G p with a : a G a P, ρ : a P p. Question: When is ξ(a G ) an Abelian ideal in p? For the answer, set γ := a 1 ξ ω + a 1 ηa g gl(a G ) connection on trivial vector bundle E := G a G. Induced connections on E r F s, a Ω 0 (G, E F ), ξ : E TG, ρ : π F TP, ξ : π E TP bundle maps.

The left-invariant shear Lifting LA homomorphisms Given ξ : a G g injective LA homomorphism, make ansatz ξ = ξ + ρ a : a G p with a : a G a P, ρ : a P p. Question: When is ξ(a G ) an Abelian ideal in p? For the answer, set γ := a 1 ξ ω + a 1 ηa g gl(a G ) connection on trivial vector bundle E := G a G. Induced connections on E r F s, a Ω 0 (G, E F ), ξ : E TG, ρ : π F TP, ξ : π E TP bundle maps. For β Ω k (G, E r F s ) set L ξ β := d (ξ β) + ξ d β Ω k (G, E (r 1) F s ).

The left-invariant shear Lifting LA homomorphisms Given ξ : a G g injective LA homomorphism, make ansatz ξ = ξ + ρ a : a G p with a : a G a P, ρ : a P p. Question: When is ξ(a G ) an Abelian ideal in p? For the answer, set γ := a 1 ξ ω + a 1 ηa g gl(a G ) connection on trivial vector bundle E := G a G. Induced connections on E r F s, a Ω 0 (G, E F ), ξ : E TG, ρ : π F TP, ξ : π E TP bundle maps. For β Ω k (G, E r F s ) set L ξ β := d (ξ β) + ξ d β Ω k (G, E (r 1) F s ).

The left-invariant shear The left-invariant shear Proposition (F., Swann) (a) Let ξ : a G g as before. Then ξ(a G ) is an Abelian ideal in p iff (i) (, ξ) is torsion-free, i.e. [ξ(e 1 ), ξ(e 2 )] = ξ( ξ(e1)e 2 ξ(e2)e 1 ) e 1, e 2 Γ(E), (ii) ξ ω = 0 and (iii) L ξ α = 0 α g. If this is the case, all connections are flat and so ( d ) 2 = 0, L ξ ω = 0, L ξ θ = 0 and we call h := p/ ξ(a G ) the shear of g. (b) Any two solvable Lie algebras of the same dimension are related by a sequence of shears.

The left-invariant shear The left-invariant shear Proposition (F., Swann) (a) Let ξ : a G g as before. Then ξ(a G ) is an Abelian ideal in p iff (i) (, ξ) is torsion-free, i.e. [ξ(e 1 ), ξ(e 2 )] = ξ( ξ(e1)e 2 ξ(e2)e 1 ) e 1, e 2 Γ(E), (ii) ξ ω = 0 and (iii) L ξ α = 0 α g. If this is the case, all connections are flat and so ( d ) 2 = 0, L ξ ω = 0, L ξ θ = 0 and we call h := p/ ξ(a G ) the shear of g. (b) Any two solvable Lie algebras of the same dimension are related by a sequence of shears.

The shear in general Lifting certain bundle maps (I) Setting: (E, ), (F, ) flat vector bundles of the same rank k over M, ξ : E TM vb map such that (, ξ) is torsion-free, ω Ω 2 (M, F ) with d ω = 0,

The shear in general Lifting certain bundle maps (I) Setting: (E, ), (F, ) flat vector bundles of the same rank k over M, ξ : E TM vb map such that (, ξ) is torsion-free, ω Ω 2 (M, F ) with d ω = 0, π : P M surjective submersion with k-dimensional fibres, θ Ω 1 (P, π F ), ρ : π F TP vb map with θ ρ = id π F, dπ ρ = 0 and d θ = π ω.

The shear in general Lifting certain bundle maps (I) Setting: (E, ), (F, ) flat vector bundles of the same rank k over M, ξ : E TM vb map such that (, ξ) is torsion-free, ω Ω 2 (M, F ) with d ω = 0, π : P M surjective submersion with k-dimensional fibres, θ Ω 1 (P, π F ), ρ : π F TP vb map with θ ρ = id π F, dπ ρ = 0 and d θ = π ω.

The shear in general Lifting certain bundle maps (I) Setting: (E, ), (F, ) flat vector bundles of the same rank k over M, ξ : E TM vb map such that (, ξ) is torsion-free, ω Ω 2 (M, F ) with d ω = 0, π : P M surjective submersion with k-dimensional fibres, θ Ω 1 (P, π F ), ρ : π F TP vb map with θ ρ = id π F, dπ ρ = 0 and d θ = π ω. Question: Can one lift ξ to ξ : π E TP with L ξ θ = 0 and (, ξ) being torsion-free?

The shear in general Lifting certain bundle maps (I) Setting: (E, ), (F, ) flat vector bundles of the same rank k over M, ξ : E TM vb map such that (, ξ) is torsion-free, ω Ω 2 (M, F ) with d ω = 0, π : P M surjective submersion with k-dimensional fibres, θ Ω 1 (P, π F ), ρ : π F TP vb map with θ ρ = id π F, dπ ρ = 0 and d θ = π ω. Question: Can one lift ξ to ξ : π E TP with L ξ θ = 0 and (, ξ) being torsion-free? Remark L ξ θ = 0 ξ(e) preserves H = ker θ and [ ξ(e), ρ(f )] = 0 for all local parallel e Γ(π E), f Γ(π F ). (, ξ) torsion-free ξ(π E) involutive.

The shear in general Lifting certain bundle maps (II) Proposition (F., Swann) A lift ξ as on the last slide exists iff (i) a Ω 0 (M, E F ) = Hom(E, F ) with d a = ξ ω and (ii) ξ ω = 0. Then ξ = ξ + ρ π a and L ξ ω = 0.

The shear in general Lifting certain bundle maps (II) Proposition (F., Swann) A lift ξ as on the last slide exists iff (i) a Ω 0 (M, E F ) = Hom(E, F ) with d a = ξ ω and (ii) ξ ω = 0. Then ξ = ξ + ρ π a and L ξ ω = 0. Definition Shear data on M is given by (a, ξ, ω) Hom(E, F ) Hom(E, TM) Ω 2 (M, F ) with invertible a such that (ξ, ) is torsion-free, d ω = 0 and (i) and (ii) from the above proposition hold for (E, ), (F, ) flat vbs of the same rank. If there (P, θ, ρ) as before and ξ : π E TP is build as above, then the leaf space W := P/ ξ(π E) is called the shear of (M, a, ξ, ω) if it is smooth.

The shear in general Shearing differential forms Using H := ker θ, define the relation α H α W for α Ω k M and α W Ω k W as in the twist case. Then: For α Ω k M (!)α W Ω k W with α H α W iff L ξ α = 0 (new invariance condition). If α H α W, then dα ( ξ a 1 α ) ω H d W α W ( same relation for differentials).

A toy example (I) (N 4, σ 0 ) symplectic manifold (M, σ) := (N R t S 1 ϕ, σ 0 + dt dϕ) symplectic. Vbs E = M R = F, F can. flat conn., E flat conn. defined by closed γ Ω 1 (M), ξ : M R TM, ξ(1) = t. ω Ω 2 Z (N) principal S 1 -bdle π : P N, θ Ω 1 (P) princ. conn. with d θ = dθ = π ω, ρ inf. princ. action (extend everything trivially to M = N R S 1 /P R S 1 ).

A toy example (II) Investigate when a C (M) nowhere vanishing defines shear data (a, ξ, ω) s.t. we can shear σ 2 to σ 2 W with d W σ 2 W = 0: (a, ξ, ω) shear data da aγ = d a = t ω = 0 d log(a) = γ.

A toy example (II) Investigate when a C (M) nowhere vanishing defines shear data (a, ξ, ω) s.t. we can shear σ 2 to σ 2 W with d W σ 2 W = 0: (a, ξ, ω) shear data da aγ = d a = t ω = 0 d log(a) = γ. σ 2 = σ 2 0 + σ 0 dt dϕ is t -invariant but still L ξ σ2 = L t σ 2 + γ ( t σ 2) = γ dϕ σ 0 = 0 γ = fdϕ for f C (M).

A toy example (II) Investigate when a C (M) nowhere vanishing defines shear data (a, ξ, ω) s.t. we can shear σ 2 to σ 2 W with d W σ 2 W = 0: (a, ξ, ω) shear data da aγ = d a = t ω = 0 d log(a) = γ. σ 2 = σ 2 0 + σ 0 dt dϕ is t -invariant but still L ξ σ2 = L t σ 2 + γ ( t σ 2) = γ dϕ σ 0 = 0 γ = fdϕ for f C (M). 0 = d W σ 2 W = dσ2 a 1 ( t σ 2) ω = a 1 dϕ σ 0 ω σ 0 ω = 0.

A toy example (II) Investigate when a C (M) nowhere vanishing defines shear data (a, ξ, ω) s.t. we can shear σ 2 to σ 2 W with d W σ 2 W = 0: (a, ξ, ω) shear data da aγ = d a = t ω = 0 d log(a) = γ. σ 2 = σ 2 0 + σ 0 dt dϕ is t -invariant but still L ξ σ2 = L t σ 2 + γ ( t σ 2) = γ dϕ σ 0 = 0 γ = fdϕ for f C (M). 0 = d W σ 2 W = dσ2 a 1 ( t σ 2) ω = a 1 dϕ σ 0 ω σ 0 ω = 0. Hence, (a, ξ, ω) shear data s.t. we can shear σ 2 to σ 2 W with d W σ 2 W = 0 a C (S 1 ) nowhere vanishing with d log(a) = γ and σ 0 ω = 0. In the twist case: a C R \ {0}. So more flexibility here. However, the shear W is always diffeomorphic to P S 1 and σ 2 W = π σ 2 0 1 a π σ 0 θ dϕ.

A toy example (II) Investigate when a C (M) nowhere vanishing defines shear data (a, ξ, ω) s.t. we can shear σ 2 to σ 2 W with d W σ 2 W = 0: (a, ξ, ω) shear data da aγ = d a = t ω = 0 d log(a) = γ. σ 2 = σ 2 0 + σ 0 dt dϕ is t -invariant but still L ξ σ2 = L t σ 2 + γ ( t σ 2) = γ dϕ σ 0 = 0 γ = fdϕ for f C (M). 0 = d W σ 2 W = dσ2 a 1 ( t σ 2) ω = a 1 dϕ σ 0 ω σ 0 ω = 0. Hence, (a, ξ, ω) shear data s.t. we can shear σ 2 to σ 2 W with d W σ 2 W = 0 a C (S 1 ) nowhere vanishing with d log(a) = γ and σ 0 ω = 0. In the twist case: a C R \ {0}. So more flexibility here. However, the shear W is always diffeomorphic to P S 1 and σ 2 W = π σ 2 0 1 a π σ 0 θ dϕ.

Shears of calibrated G 2 -structures on almost Abelian Lie algebras A G 2 -structure ϕ Ω 3 M is called calibrated iff dϕ = 0. Calibrated G 2 -structures on 7d almost Abelian Lie algebras (aalas) g, i.e. g = R 6 R, have been clasified by F. Classification of all calibrated G 2 -structures on LAs of the form ( h 3 R 3) R (Exact result, see next slide): (1) Determination of all shears of calibrated G 2 -structures on aalas to calibrated G 2 -structures on LAs of the form ( h3 R 3) R (and more, e.g. also for cocalibrated). (2) Proof that any calibrated G 2 -structure on LA of the form ( h3 R 3) R can be sheared to one on an aala. (3) Left-invariant shear is invertible Classification.

Shears of calibrated G 2 -structures on almost Abelian Lie algebras A G 2 -structure ϕ Ω 3 M is called calibrated iff dϕ = 0. Calibrated G 2 -structures on 7d almost Abelian Lie algebras (aalas) g, i.e. g = R 6 R, have been clasified by F. Classification of all calibrated G 2 -structures on LAs of the form ( h 3 R 3) R (Exact result, see next slide): (1) Determination of all shears of calibrated G 2 -structures on aalas to calibrated G 2 -structures on LAs of the form ( h3 R 3) R (and more, e.g. also for cocalibrated). (2) Proof that any calibrated G 2 -structure on LA of the form ( h3 R 3) R can be sheared to one on an aala. (3) Left-invariant shear is invertible Classification. Recall: G 2 -structure ϕ Λ 3 g + orthogonal splitting g = u span(x ) induced almost Hermitian structure (g, J, ω = X ϕ u ) and an induced non-zero (3, 0)-form ρ = ϕ u on u.

Shears of calibrated G 2 -structures on almost Abelian Lie algebras A G 2 -structure ϕ Ω 3 M is called calibrated iff dϕ = 0. Calibrated G 2 -structures on 7d almost Abelian Lie algebras (aalas) g, i.e. g = R 6 R, have been clasified by F. Classification of all calibrated G 2 -structures on LAs of the form ( h 3 R 3) R (Exact result, see next slide): (1) Determination of all shears of calibrated G 2 -structures on aalas to calibrated G 2 -structures on LAs of the form ( h3 R 3) R (and more, e.g. also for cocalibrated). (2) Proof that any calibrated G 2 -structure on LA of the form ( h3 R 3) R can be sheared to one on an aala. (3) Left-invariant shear is invertible Classification. Recall: G 2 -structure ϕ Λ 3 g + orthogonal splitting g = u span(x ) induced almost Hermitian structure (g, J, ω = X ϕ u ) and an induced non-zero (3, 0)-form ρ = ϕ u on u.

Calibrated G 2 -structures on (h 3 R 3 ) R Theorem (F., Swann) g 7d LA with 6d ideal u = h 3 R 3, X u with X = 1, ϕ Λ 3 g G 2 -structure, U 1 := [u, u] J[u, u], U 2 := U 1 z(u), U 3 := z(u) u. Then ϕ is calibrated iff J[u, u] z(u) and (i) z(u) J-invariant, λ, µ R, lin. cpx. h ij : U i U j s. t. ( 2λI2 ) h 21 h 31 ad(x ) u = 0 3λI 2+µJ h 32+ h 0 0 λi 2 µj w.r.t. u = U 1 U 2 U 3, h : U 3 U 2 certain non-cpx. lin. map or (ii) z(u) not J-invariant, ρ [u,u] Λ 2 z(u) = 0 and h 1 sl(u, ρ) with h 1 U1 = 0, h 1 (z(u)) z(u) s. t. ad(x ) u = diag( 2λ, 6λ, 3λI 2, λi 2 ) + h 1 w.r.t. u = [u, u] J[u, u] U 2 U 3 for λ R specified by ρ and g.

Calibrated G 2 -structures on (h 3 R 3 ) R Theorem (F., Swann) g 7d LA with 6d ideal u = h 3 R 3, X u with X = 1, ϕ Λ 3 g G 2 -structure, U 1 := [u, u] J[u, u], U 2 := U 1 z(u), U 3 := z(u) u. Then ϕ is calibrated iff J[u, u] z(u) and (i) z(u) J-invariant, λ, µ R, lin. cpx. h ij : U i U j s. t. ( 2λI2 ) h 21 h 31 ad(x ) u = 0 3λI 2+µJ h 32+ h 0 0 λi 2 µj w.r.t. u = U 1 U 2 U 3, h : U 3 U 2 certain non-cpx. lin. map or (ii) z(u) not J-invariant, ρ [u,u] Λ 2 z(u) = 0 and h 1 sl(u, ρ) with h 1 U1 = 0, h 1 (z(u)) z(u) s. t. ad(x ) u = diag( 2λ, 6λ, 3λI 2, λi 2 ) + h 1 w.r.t. u = [u, u] J[u, u] U 2 U 3 for λ R specified by ρ and g.

Summary The shear naturally popes up in the left-invariant setting as a generalization of the twist by replacing central with Abelian extensions. The general shear is obtained by replacing principal bundles with Abelian structure group by foliated manifolds with tangent spaces of leaves being pullbacks of flat vector bundles. Analogous results for the shear when replacing exterior derivatives by covariant exterior derivatives and introducing covariant Lie derivatives.

Summary The shear naturally popes up in the left-invariant setting as a generalization of the twist by replacing central with Abelian extensions. The general shear is obtained by replacing principal bundles with Abelian structure group by foliated manifolds with tangent spaces of leaves being pullbacks of flat vector bundles. Analogous results for the shear when replacing exterior derivatives by covariant exterior derivatives and introducing covariant Lie derivatives. Shear led to some new left-invariant examples of geometric structures not attainable (left-invariantly) by the twist.

Summary The shear naturally popes up in the left-invariant setting as a generalization of the twist by replacing central with Abelian extensions. The general shear is obtained by replacing principal bundles with Abelian structure group by foliated manifolds with tangent spaces of leaves being pullbacks of flat vector bundles. Analogous results for the shear when replacing exterior derivatives by covariant exterior derivatives and introducing covariant Lie derivatives. Shear led to some new left-invariant examples of geometric structures not attainable (left-invariantly) by the twist.

Some open problems Find interesting non-invariant examples! Can one obtain (P, θ, ρ) under certain circumstances from data on M? Can one invert the shear?