Integrated methodology for assessing the effects of geomorphological river restoration on fish habitat and riparian vegetation

Similar documents
How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

BASIS FOR RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT

JARAMA RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT (VALDETORRES): Case study

Assessment. Assessment

Fish habitat characterization and quantification using LIDAR and conventional topographic information in river survey.

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Sprague River Basin Restoration Post Project Evaluations: Lessons Learned and Future Applications

APPROACH TO THE SPANISH WATER ORGANISATION IMPROVING FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING, LAWS AND AUTHORITIES COORDINATION

Water quality needs: Flow, velocity. Fish biologists need: Critical depth or velocity. Hydrology gives flows m 3 /s or day

Distinct landscape features with important biologic, hydrologic, geomorphic, and biogeochemical functions.

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Delimiting Freedom Space for Rivers Using GIS and Remote Sensing:

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

New Approaches to Restoring NH s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal

4.17 Spain. Catalonia

STREAM RESTORATION AWRA Summer Specialty Conference, GIS and Water Resources IX

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Geomorphology Studies

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

Upper Drac River restoration project

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

A SIMPLE GIS METHOD FOR OBTAINING FLOODED AREAS

Development of Riparian Maps for Sonoma County Long Term Riparian Corridor Conservation. Mark Tukman & Dylan Loudon Tukman Geospatial

Assignment 1. Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435

Technical Memorandum No

Deliverable 2.1: Multi-scale framework and indicators of hydromorphological processes and forms

Consequences of river regulation works: altered fluvial processes + increasing flood hazard

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Fluvial Geomorphology

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Deriving Vegetation Characteristics from LIDAR Data and Two-Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling of the San Joaquin River Floodplain

Monitoring Headwater Streams for Landscape Response to

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF FLUVIAL SEDIMENT DELIVERY, NEKA RIVER, IRAN. S.E. Kermani H. Golmaee M.Z. Ahmadi

RESTORATION DESIGN FOR REROUTED WATERCOURSES

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

West Branch of the St. Mary s River Restoration Project 2017 Post Construction Report

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEHRADUN

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Introduction Fluvial Processes in Small Southeastern Watersheds

Regaining sediments: the Orba River lower reach bank erosions (NW Italy)

Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans

Updated Fluvial Geomorphology Modeling Approach

Analysis of coarse sediment connectivity in semiarid river channels

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure. Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis

The Effects of Geomorphology and Watershed Land Use on Spawning Habitat

Indexing vulnerability of an embankment reach against breaching: A remote sensing and hydrodynamic based study

Hydraulics of bendway weirs

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

Geo-spatial Analysis for Prediction of River Floods

Dr.ing.Iulian Nichersu, Dr. Ing. Iuliana Nichersu 1

Watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply: Advancing the Science of Watershed Analysis

Bipole III Transmission Project Construction Environmental Protection Plan Construction Section N1 Environmentally Sensitive Site Locations Map 25

Stream geomorphology mapping

Second National Symposium on GIS in Saudi Arabia Al Khober, April 23-25, 2007

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

A real-time flood forecasting system based on GIS and DEM

Discharge. Discharge (Streamflow) is: Q = Velocity (L T -1 ) x Area (L 2 ) Units: L 3 T -1 e.g., m 3 s -1. Velocity. Area

Ms. A. Mormando's Class *

River Nith restoration, cbec UK Ltd, October 2013 APPENDIX A

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix E. River Corridor Delineation Process. VT Agency of Natural Resources. April, E0 - April, 2004

Dolores River Watershed Study

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

A GEOMORPHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO RESTORATION OF INCISED RIVERS. David L. Rosgen 1

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

Perspectives on river restoration science, geomorphic processes, and channel stability

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

Floodplain modeling. Ovidius University of Constanta (P4) Romania & Technological Educational Institute of Serres, Greece

Important Copyright Information

Restoring Rivers in Cumbria Online Story Map of a case study on the River Lyvennet

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Identifying, Understanding and Addressing Flood-Related Hazards

Danube Sediment Management Restoration of Sediment Balance in the Danube A still ongoing project preparation

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

Floodplain Modeling and Mapping Using The Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Hec-RAS/Hec-GeoRAS Applications. Case of Edirne, Turkey.

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Transcription:

Integrated methodology for assessing the effects of geomorphological river restoration on fish habitat and riparian vegetation Judit Maroto *a, Miguel Marchamalo a,b, Diego García de Jalón a, Marta González del Tánago a, Rubén Martínez Marín b a Hydrobiology Research Group. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain b Land Morphology and Engineering Department. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid. * Corresponding author: Judit Maroto. judit.maroto@gmail.com ABSTRACT Changes in fluvial geomorphology may have serious impacts, causing losses in the dynamics and naturalness of their forms. In many cases these changes go from a natural meandering river, with balanced erosion and sedimentation processes, to a channelized narrow channel with rigid and stable margins, with dynamics restricted to only vertical dimension, with a consequent alteration of the river bed. On the other hand, these changes affect the naturalness of the banks, limiting the development of riparian vegetation and reducing the cross connectivity of the riparian corridor. Common channelizations and disconnections of meanders increase the channel slope, and therefore water velocity, resulting in processes of bed degradation and regressive erosion, effect increased as a result of the narrowing of the channel and the concentration of flows. This process of incision may turn the floodplain to be "hung", being completely disconnected from the water table, with important consequences for vegetation. The Arga river has been channelized and rectified, as it passes along the meander RamalHondo and Soto Gil (Funes, Navarra). Geomorphical restoration through remeandering is to be projected. This paper analyses the effects of these designs on fish habitat and riparian vegetation. Two very contrasting restoration scenarios, in terms of geomorphology, have been established to assess the effects of these changes have on the habitat of one of the major fish species in the area (Luciobabus graellsii) and on the riparian vegetation. To accomplish this goal, we run 2D hydraulic simulations (Infoworks RS), evaluating hydraulic and habitat conditions using digital elevation models from LIDAR flight and bathymetric data. The results obtained helped to evaluate the effects of past geomorphologic alterations on habitat. They also allowed to evaluate the effects of contrasting scenarios on fish and vegetation habitat.

1. INTRODUCTION The geomorphological processes are the key for the appropriate functioning of rivers as ecosystems. The geomorphological deterioration of European rivers is increasing progressively, as more direct actions on channels and floodplains related to urbanization, agriculture or industrial processes are carried out every time; these actions are especially aggressive against geomorphological processes and river morphologies. (Ollero, 2008) This invasion of the floodplain by uses other than those strictly related to the floodplain has generated an increment of the vulnerability to flooding, what has generated channelized narrow channels with rigid and stable margins and disconnections of their natural meanders. As an important consequence, habitat loss has been observed and documented, what has generated a new movement towards the recovery of the natural structure and processes of these ecosystems. In this paper an example of a high geomorphological alterated reach has been selected: the river Arga between the towns of Peralta and Funes, in Navarra region (Spain), where works against flooding damages started in year 1966, and whose consequences can be seen in the present and thought to keep incrementing in time. As main consequences of these processes, changes in fish habitat conditions (depth, velocity) and vegetation characteristics (vertical connection with water table) have been observed. According to this, the objectives of this research was: Analyze the responses of fish and vegetation communities to different alternatives of geomorphological restoration. 2. METHODOLOGY Area of study River Arga, is one of the main tributaries of the Ebro River, in NE of Spain. It is a left bank tributary of the Ebro river, and its basin extends from el Collado de Urquiaga to the river Ebro in Milagro. It has a surface of 2689.2 km2, and a length of 145 km. The river reach selected for this research is situated between the villages of Peralta and Funes, in Navarra Region (Spain), where the river was channelized and completely disconnected from the meanders Ramalhondo and Soto Gil. The total study area presents a surface of 108 ha, of which 13 ha belong to the channelized river and 95 ha to the disconnected meander. The channelized part has a length of 1,2 km.

Figure 1. Meanders of Ramalhondo and Soto Gil (River Arga): location in Navarre province (Spain) Restoration image and design of alternatives For the design of the restoration image, we analyzed pressures and impacts on the fluvial reach and we compared the actual situation with the reference conditions for this reach (meandering river). The main feature of the restoration image was to reconnect the old meanders to the main channel, with the following aims: a) restoration of fluvial geomorphologic dynamics b) increase river space controlling river bed degradation processes c) promoting native fish species and d) reduce the impact of floods on Funes town. Two alternatives where designed corresponding with two very contrasting restoration scenarios, in terms of geomorphology. The first alternative consisted of reconnecting old meanders during annual maximum floods (discontinuous connection for flows higher than 407 m 3 /s). The second alternative aimed at reconnecting old meanders almost continuously, for average flows (40 m 3 /s) 2D Hydraulic simulation and fish habitat evaluation A Digital Elevation Model of the area of study was built integrating LiDAR data for the floodplains and bathymetric profiles for the wet channel (Source: TRACASA, 2009). The digital elevation model was modified in ArcGIS to fulfil the requirements of each designed alternative, allowing a certain degree of connection between the channel and the old meanders. For the hydraulic simulation it was used the Infoworks RS software. It is a model that simulates water depth, level and speed in two dimensions (x, y) for each pixel of a given terrain under certain flow conditions (input hydrograph, output level, roughness). Infoworks RS works iteratively solving the equations of continuity averaging the speed of flow in the water column above each terrain pixel (2D model)

For the evaluation of fish habitat we followed the GIS integrated methodology proposed by Marchamalo et al. (2007), based on the evaluation of the Weighted usable area (WUA) for different stages (adults, juveniles, fry and spawning ) of the most representative fish species in the area, the Ebro barbel (Luciobabus graellsii) using preference curves elaborated for Spain by ECOHIDRAULICA (2010) The studied reach is mainly a gravel bed river for substrate suitability. Once evaluated the suitability (0 1) for depth (Sd), velocity (Sv) and substrate (Ss) conditions for each fish stage and simulated flow, it was calculated the Composite Suitability Index (CSI) for each wetted pixel as the geometric mean of the three indicators: CSI 3 Sd Sv Ss Finally, the Weighted Usable Area (WUA) (Bovee, 1982) for each brown trout stage under different flow conditions was calculated as an aggregate of the product of the Composite Suitability Index (CSI, range 0 1) evaluated at every pixel and the area of the pixel. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Figure 2 shows the results of the hydraulic simulations under the two alternatives and three design flows (5.5 m 3 /s, 40 m 3 /s and 407 m 3 /s). Displayed images present the stabilized water depth for each alternative and simulated flow. It can be noted that full connection is attained for alternative 1 with a shallow water table at 407 m 3 /s whereas this connection is effective an alternative 2 for flows higher than 40 m 3 /s. Figure 3 presents the evaluation of available habitat for the Ebro barbel (Luciobabus graellsii) under different hydraulic conditions. Alternative 2 provides more effective habitat for the target species than alternative 1.

Q= 40 m 3 /s Alternative 1 Q= 5.5 m 3 /s Q= 407 m 3 /s Alternative 2 Q= 40 m 3 /s Q= 5.5 m 3 /s Q=407m 3 /s Figure 2. Depth of water after hydraulic simulation in two different restoration alternatives for the meanders of Ramalhondo and Soto Gil (River Arga) Alternative 1 Q= 40 m 3 /s Q= 5.5 m 3 /s Alternative 2 Figure 4. Combined suitability index for the Ebro barbel (Luciobabus graellsii) in two different restoration alternatives for the meanders of Ramalhondo and Soto Gil (River Arga)

As it can be seen in Table 1, total weighted usable area is almost tripe in Alternative 2 for average flow than in alternative 1 Table 1. Evaluation of total wet surface and weighted usable area (WUA) for different simulated flow and alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Q= 5.5 m 3 /s Q= 40 m 3 /s Q= 5.5 m 3 /s Q= 40 m 3 /s Total surface (m 2 ) 64,288 75,844 99,382 189,388 WUA (m 2 ) 35,113 32,985 63,356 112,631 % (WUA/Total) 54.6 43.4 63.7 59.4 In table 2 it has been summarized the degree of accomplishment of the objectives previously established with the reconnection of the old meanders. As it can be seen, under alternative 2 the objective of fish habitat enhancement is achieved, because it increments the weighted usable area (WUA) in comparison with the present situation (see table 1). Also under this alternative a lower impact of floods on Funes town has been observed due to the amount of water accumulated in the reconnected old meanders. However, for the rest of objectives, no significant differences have been detected. In both alternatives the geomorphologic dynamics, riparian characteristics and riparian habitat would be enhanced in comparison with the actual situation but with no significant differences under the two studied alternatives. Table 2. Evaluation of the alternatives in terms of different objective meetings ( +++ objective completely accomplished; + objective barely accomplished; + objective accomplish in a unknown degree; 0 not accomplished objective) Objective Riparian Geomorphologic Riparian Fish habitat Flood habitat dynamics enhancement enhancement protection enhancement Alternative 1 + ++ ++ 0 ++ Alternative2 + ++ ++ +++ +++

4. CONCLUSIONS The geomorphologic restoration of rivers, in this case the reconnection of the river with their old meanders can help to recover the dynamics and natural structure of the ecosystem. However, it must be studied the effect of these actions on the different components of the fluvial ecosystem. In this example positive responses of fish habitat to geomorphological restoration have been showed, but for further conclusion in terms of vegetation habitat, the simulation in the long term with the sediment component integrated could help to estimate better how it will respond to these actions. REFERENCES Bovee, K.D. 1982. A Guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper nº12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS 82/26 ECOHIDRÁULICA S.L. 2010. Curvas de preferencia para el barbo de Graells adulto en España. Documento técnico. Marchamalo, M., M.D. Bejarano, D. García de Jalón & R. Martínez.2007. Fish habitat characterization and quantification using LIDAR and conventional topographic information in river survey. Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology Ollero, A. 2008. Alteraciones geomorfológicas de los ríos en Europa y principios para la restauración de la dinámica fluvial. Oral Presentation. EXPOZARAGOZA2008.