Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Alma City Lake, Wabaunsee County, Kansas Kansas Biological Survey Applied Science and Technology for Reservoir Assessment (ASTRA) Program Report 2011-13 (March 2011)
This work was funded by the Kansas Water Office through the State Water Plan Fund in support of the Reservoir Sustainability Initiative.
SUMMARY On July 27, 2010, the Kansas Biological Survey (KBS) performed a bathymetric survey of Alma City Lake in Wabaunsee County, Kansas. The survey was carried out using acoustic echosounding apparatus linked to a global positioning system. The bathymetric survey was georeferenced to both horizontal and vertical reference datums. Sediment samples were collected from three sites within the reservoir: One sample was taken near the dam; a second at mid-lake; and a third in the upper end. Sampling was performed on the same day as the bathymetric survey, following completion of the survey. Sediment samples were analyzed for particle size distributions. Summary Data: Bathymetric Survey: Date of survey: July 27, 2010 Reservoir Statistics: Elevation on survey date Area on survey date: Volume on survey date: Maximum depth: 1120.68 ft 51.7 acres 945.9 acre-feet 42.5 ft Elevation Benchmark (if applicable) UTM location of elevation benchmark: 737188.83, 431777.85 UTM Zone: 14N UTM datum: NAD83 Elevation of benchmark, from GPS: 1121.07 ft. Vertical datum, all data: NAVD88 Sediment Survey: Date of sediment survey: July 27, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY...i TABLE OF CONTENTS...ii LIST OF FIGURES...iii LIST OF TABLES...iv LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION... 1 BATHYMETRIC SURVEYING PROCEDURE Pre-survey preparation:... 3 Survey procedures:... 3 Establishment of lake level on survey date:... 4 Location of lake elevation benchmark... 5 NGS OPUS solution report... 6 Post-processing... 8 BATHYMETRIC SURVEY RESULTS Area-Volume-Elevation Tables... 11 SEDIMENT SAMPLING... 16 Procedures... 16 Results... 16 ii
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Alma City Lake... 1 Figure 2. Location of Alma City Lake in Wabaunsee County, Kansas... 2 Figure 3. a. Location of ASTRA benchmark on Alma City Lake... 4 b. Location of ASTRA benchmark (photo)... 5 c. Location of ASTRA benchmark (photo)... 5 Figure 4. Bathymetric survey transects... 7 Figure 5. Reservoir depth map... 10 Figure 6. Cumulative area-elevation curve.... 15 Figure 7. Cumulative volume-elevation curve.... 15 Figure 8. Location of sediment sites in Alma City Lake... 17 Figure 9. Sediment particle size analysis... 18 Figure 10. Particle size distribution of sediment samples... 19 iii
LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments... 11 Table 2. Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments... 13 Table 3 Sediment sampling site data... 16 iv
LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION Figure 1. Alma City Lake, Wabaunsee County, Kansas. Photo courtesy of C. Buttenhoff, Kansas Water Office. Alma City Lake is located two and a half miles southeast of Alma City, Kansas. Constructed in 1966 on a tributary of the South Branch of Mill Creek in Wabaunsee County, Alma City Lake is a public owned lake that serves as a water supply for the City of Alma. 1
Wabaunsee County, Kansas St. George Wamego St. Marys St. Marys Rossville Maple Hill McFarland Paxico Alma City Lake Alma Alta Vista Eskridge Harveyville Ü Miles 0 1 2 4 6 8 Figure 2. Location of Alma City Lake in Wabaunsee County, Kansas 2
Reservoir Bathymetric (Depth) Surveying Procedures KBS operates a Biosonics DT-X echosounding system (www.biosonicsinc.com) with a 200 khz split-beam transducer and a 38-kHz single-beam transducer. Latitudelongitude information is provided by a global positioning system (GPS) that interfaces with the Biosonics system. ESRI s ArcGIS is used for on-lake navigation and positioning, with GPS data feeds provided by the Biosonics unit through a serial cable. Power is provided to the echosounding unit, command/navigation computer, and auxiliary monitor by means of a inverter and battery backup device that in turn draw power from the 12-volt boat battery. Pre-survey preparation: Geospatial reference data: Prior to conducting the survey, geospatial data of the target lake is acquired, including georeferenced National Agricultural Imagery Project (NAIP) photography. The lake boundary is digitized as a polygon shapefile from the FSA NAIP georeferenced aerial photography obtained online from the Data Access and Service Center (DASC). Prior to the lake survey, a series of transect lines are created as a shapefile in ArcGIS for guiding the boat during the survey. Survey procedures: Calibration (Temperature and ball check): After boat launch and initialization of the Biosonics system and command computer, system parameters are set in the Biosonics Visual Acquisition software. The temperature of the lake at 1-2 meters is taken with a research-grade metric electronic thermometer. This temperature, in degrees Celsius, is input to the Biosonics Visual Acquisition software to calculate the speed of sound in water at the given temperature at the given depth. Start range, end range, ping duration, and ping interval are also set at this time. A ball check is performed using a tungsten-carbide sphere supplied by Biosonics for this purpose. The ball is lowered to a known distance (1.0 meter) below the transducer faces. The position of the ball in the water column (distance from the transducer face to the ball) is clearly visible on the echogram. The echogram distance is compared to the known distance to assure that parameters are properly set and the system is operating correctly. On-lake survey procedures: Using the GPS Extension of ArcGIS, the GPS data feed from the GPS receiver via the Biosonics echosounder, and the pre-planned transect pattern, the location of the boat on the lake in real-time is shown on the command/navigation computer screen. The transect pattern is maintained except when modified by obstructions in the lake (e.g., partially submerged trees) or shallow water and mudflats. Data are automatically logged in new files every half-hour (approximately 9000-ping files) by the Biosonics system. 3
Establishment Of Lake Level On Survey Dates: State and Local Reservoirs: Most state and local lakes in Kansas do not have water surface elevation gauges. Therefore, a local benchmark at the edge of a lake is established, typically a concrete pad or wall adjacent to the water. The location of the benchmark is photographed and a description noted. On the day of the survey, the vertical distance between the water surface and the surface of the benchmark is measured. In cases where the benchmark must be established a distance away from the lake, a surveygrade laser level is used to establish the vertical distance between benchmark and water surface. A TopCon HiPerLite+ survey-grade static global positioning system is used to establish the height of the benchmark. The unit is set at a fixed distance above the benchmark, and the vertical distance between the benchmark and the Antenna Reference Point recorded. The unit is allowed to record data points for a minimum of two hours at a rate of one point every 10 seconds. Following GPS data acquisition, the data are downloaded at the office from the GPS unit, converted from TopCon proprietary format to RINEX format, and uploaded to the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) On-line Positioning User Service (OPUS). Raw data are processed by OPUS with respect to three NGS CORS (Continuously Operating Reference Stations) locations and results returned to the user. The elevation of the benchmark is provided in meters as the orthometric height (NAVD88, computed using GEOID03). The vertical difference between the lake surface on the survey day is subtracted from the OPUS-computer orthometric height to produce the lake elevation value, in meters. This lake elevation value is entered as an attribute of the lake perimeter polygon shapefile in postprocessing to create lake bottom elevation and water depth models. The ASTRA elevation benchmark for Alma City Lake is the concrete spill way on the southeast corner of the lake (Figure 3a, Figure 3b, Figure 3c). The water surface elevation of Alma City Lake of July 27, 2010 was 1120.68 feet AMSL. Coordinates: UTM Zone 14 East: 737188.83 North: 4317778.85 Figure 3a. Location of ASTRA benchmark on Alma City Lake. 4
Location of Lake Elevation Benchmark: Alma City Lake: UTM (Zone 14) Easting (X) [meters] 737188.83, Northing (Y) [meters] 4317778.85 Figure 3b. View of concrete pad benchmark site, facing southeast. Figure 3c. View of benchmark site, facing northwest. 5
FILE: log0208o.10o 000189559 1008 NOTE: Antenna offsets supplied by the user were zero. Coordinates 1008 returned will be for the antenna reference point (ARP). 1008 NGS OPUS SOLUTION REPORT ======================== All computed coordinate accuracies are listed as peak-to-peak values. For additional information: http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/opus/about.html#accuracy USER: mjakub@ku.edu DATE: March 28, 2011 RINEX FILE: log0208o.10o TIME: 16:40:20 UTC SOFTWARE: page5 1009.28 master50.pl 121510 START: 2010/07/27 14:57:00 EPHEMERIS: igs15942.eph [precise] STOP: 2010/07/27 17:58:00 NAV FILE: brdc2080.10n OBS USED: 6047 / 6685 : 90% ANT NAME: TPSHIPER_PLUS NONE # FIXED AMB: 40 / 46 : 87% ARP HEIGHT: 0.0 OVERALL RMS: 0.017(m) REF FRAME: NAD_83(CORS96)(EPOCH:2002.0000) ITRF00 (EPOCH:2010.5690) X: -541573.231(m) 0.015(m) -541573.977(m) 0.015(m) Y: -4935558.993(m) 0.031(m) -4935557.634(m) 0.031(m) Z: 3990519.045(m) 0.040(m) 3990518.917(m) 0.040(m) LAT: 38 58 36.81925 0.017(m) 38 58 36.84192 0.017(m) E LON: 263 44 16.98635 0.012(m) 263 44 16.94939 0.012(m) W LON: 96 15 43.01365 0.012(m) 96 15 43.05061 0.012(m) EL HGT: 311.283(m) 0.050(m) 310.215(m) 0.050(m) ORTHO HGT: 341.704(m) 0.085(m) [NAVD88 (Computed using GEOID09)] UTM COORDINATES STATE PLANE COORDINATES UTM (Zone 14) SPC (1501 KS N) Northing (Y) [meters] 4317778.856 72887.373 Easting (X) [meters] 737188.833 550596.095 Convergence [degrees] 1.72305588 1.09969075 Point Scale 1.00029280 0.99996821 Combined Factor 1.00024395 0.99991937 US NATIONAL GRID DESIGNATOR: 14SQJ3718817778(NAD 83) BASE STATIONS USED PID DESIGNATION LATITUDE LONGITUDE DISTANCE(m) DI3428 KSU1 KSU1_KSUN_KS2006 CORS ARP N390602.677 W0963634.093 33082.4 DF9221 ZKC1 KANSAS CTY WAAS 1 CORS ARP N385248.550 W0944726.964 128020.3 DL6143 MOPC MODOT PLATTE CITY CORS ARP N392302.425 W0944658.136 135563.2 NEAREST NGS PUBLISHED CONTROL POINT JF1278 P 231 N385839. W0961556. 319.4 This position and the above vector components were computed without any knowledge by the National Geodetic Survey regarding the equipment or field operating procedures used. 6
0 510 1,020 1,530 Figure 4. Bathymetric survey lines for Alma City Lake 7 Feet 2,040 Ü
Post-processing (Visual Bottom Typer) The Biosonics DT-X system produces data files in a proprietary DT4 file format containing acoustic and GPS data. To extract the bottom position from the acoustic data, each DT4 file is processed through the Biosonics Visual Bottom Typer (VBT) software. The processing algorithm is described as follows: The BioSonics, Inc. bottom tracker is an end_up" algorithm, in that it begins searching for the bottom echo portion of a ping from the last sample toward the first sample. The bottom tracker tracks the bottom echo by isolating the region(s) where the data exceeds a peak threshold for N consecutive samples, then drops below a surface threshold for M samples. Once a bottom echo has been identified, a bottom sampling window is used to find the next echo. The bottom echo is first isolated by user_defined threshold values that indicate (1) the lowest energy to include in the bottom echo (bottom detection threshold) and (2) the lowest energy to start looking for a bottom peak (peak threshold). The bottom detection threshold allows the user to filter out noise caused by a low data acquisition threshold. The peak threshold prevents the algorithm from identifying the small energy echoes (due to fish, sediment or plant life) as a bottom echo. (Biosonics Visual Bottom Typer User s Manual, Version 1.10, p. 70). Data is output as a comma-delimited (*.csv) text file. A set number of qualifying pings are averaged to produce a single report (for example, the output for ping 31 {when pings per report is 20} is the average of all values for pings 12-31). Standard analysis procedure for all 2008 and later data is to use the average of 5 pings to produce one output value. All raw *.csv files are merged into one master *.csv file using the shareware program File Append and Split Tool (FAST) by Boxer Software (Ver. 1.0, 2006). Post-processing (Excel) The master *.csv file created by the FAST utility is imported into Microsoft Excel. Excess header lines are deleted (each input CSV file has its own header), and the header file is edited to change the column headers #Ping to Ping and E1 to E11, characters that are not ingestable by ArcGIS. Entries with depth values of zero (0) are deleted, as are any entries with depth values less than the start range of the data acquisition parameter (0.49 meters or less) (indicating areas where the water was too shallow to record a depth reading). In Excel, depth adjustments are made. A new field Adj_Depth is created. The value for AdjDepth is calculated as AdjDepth = Depth + (Transducer Face Depth), where the Transducer Face Depth represents the depth of the transducer face below water level in meters (Typically, this value is 0.2 meters; however, if changes were made in the field, the correct level is taken from field notes and applied to the data). Depth in feet is also calculated as DepthFt = Adj_Depth * 3.28084. 8
These water depths are RELATIVE water depths that can vary from day-to-day based on the elevation of the water surface. In order to normalize all depth measurements to an absolute reference, water depths must be subtracted from an established value for the elevation of the water surface at the time of the bathymetric survey. Determination of water surface elevation has been described in an earlier section on establishment of lake levels. To set depths relative to lake elevation, two additional fields are added to the attribute table of the point shapefile: LakeElevM, the reference surface elevation (the elevation of the water surface on the day that the aerial photography from which the lake perimeter polygon was digitized)and Elev_Ft, the elevation of the water surface in feet above sea level (Elev_ft), computed by converting ElevM to elevation in feet (ElevM * 3.28084). Particularly for multi-day surveys, Adj_Depth and Depth_Ft should NOT be used for further analysis or interpolation. If water depth is desired, it should be produced by subtracting Elev_M or Elev_Ft from the reference elevation used for interpolation purposes (for federal reservoirs, the elevation of the water surface on the day that the aerial photography from which the lake perimeter polygon was digitized). Post-processing (ArcGIS): Ingest to ArcGIS is accomplished by using the Tools Add XY Data option. The projection information is specified at this time (WGS84). Point files are displayed as Event files, and are then exported as a shapefile (filename convention: ALLPOINTS_WGS84.shp). The pointfile is then reprojected to the UTM coordinate system of the appropriate zone (14 or 15) (filename convention ALLPOINTS_UTM.shp). Raster interpolation of the point data is performed using the same input data and the Topo to Raster option within the 3D Extension of ArcGIS. The elevation of the reservoir on the date of aerial photography used to create the perimeter/shoreline shapefile was used as the water surface elevation in all interpolations from point data to raster data. Contour line files are derived from the raster interpolation files using the ArcGIS command under 3D Analyst Raster Surface Contour. Area-elevation-volume tables are derived using an ArcGIS extension custom written for and available from the ASTRA Program. Summarized, the extension calculates the area and volume of the reservoir at 1/10-foot elevation increments from the raster data for a series of water surfaces beginning at the lowest elevation recorded and progressing upward in 1/10-foot elevation increments to the reference water surface. Cumulative volume is also computed in acre-feet. 9
Depth in Feet 0-5 5.01-10 10.01-15 15.01-20 20.01-25 25.01-30 30.01-35 35.01-40 40.01-45 5 ft Contour 0 510 1,020 1,530 Feet 2,040 Ü Figure 5. Water depth based on July 27, 2010 bathymetric surveys for Alma City Lake. Depths are based on a pool elevation of 1120.68 ft. 10
Table 1 Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1078 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1079 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.0 1080 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 1081 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 1082 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 1083 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 1084 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.0 8.1 1085 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9.0 1086 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.8 1087 9.9 9.9 10.0 10.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.4 10.5 1088 10.6 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.9 11.0 11.0 11.1 11.2 1089 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.8 1090 11.9 12.0 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.2 12.3 12.3 12.4 12.5 1091 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.7 12.8 12.9 12.9 13.0 13.1 13.1 1092 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.8 1093 13.9 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.5 14.6 1094 14.7 14.7 14.8 14.9 14.9 15.0 15.1 15.1 15.2 15.2 1095 15.3 15.4 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.8 15.9 1096 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.8 16.9 17.0 1097 17.1 17.2 17.4 17.5 17.6 17.7 17.8 17.9 18.0 18.1 1098 18.2 18.2 18.4 18.5 18.6 18.7 18.8 18.8 18.9 19.0 1099 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.5 19.6 19.7 19.8 19.9 20.0 20.1 11
Table 1 Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1100 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.8 20.9 21.0 21.1 1101 21.2 21.3 21.5 21.6 21.7 21.8 21.9 22.0 22.2 22.3 1102 22.4 22.5 22.6 22.7 22.8 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 1103 23.6 23.7 23.8 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.4 24.5 24.6 24.7 1104 24.9 25.0 25.1 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.7 25.8 25.9 26.1 1105 26.3 26.4 26.5 26.7 26.8 26.9 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.4 1106 27.5 27.6 27.7 27.9 28.0 28.1 28.3 28.4 28.6 28.7 1107 28.8 29.0 29.1 29.3 29.4 29.6 29.7 29.9 30.0 30.2 1108 30.3 30.5 30.7 30.8 31.0 31.1 31.3 31.4 31.6 31.7 1109 31.9 32.0 32.2 32.3 32.5 32.6 32.7 32.9 33.0 33.1 1110 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.7 33.8 34.0 34.1 34.3 34.5 34.6 1111 34.8 34.9 35.1 35.3 35.4 35.6 35.8 35.9 36.1 36.2 1112 36.4 36.6 36.7 36.9 37.0 37.2 37.3 37.5 37.7 37.8 1113 38.0 38.2 38.3 38.5 38.7 38.9 39.0 39.2 39.3 39.5 1114 39.6 39.8 39.9 40.1 40.2 40.4 40.5 40.7 40.8 41.0 1115 41.1 41.3 41.4 41.6 41.7 41.9 42.1 42.3 42.4 42.6 1116 42.8 42.9 43.1 43.3 43.4 43.6 43.8 43.9 44.1 44.3 1117 44.5 44.7 44.8 45.0 45.2 45.4 45.6 45.8 46.0 46.2 1118 46.4 46.6 46.8 47.0 47.1 47.3 47.5 47.6 47.8 48.0 1119 48.2 48.3 48.5 48.7 48.9 49.0 49.2 49.4 49.6 49.9 1120 50.1 50.3 50.5 50.8 51.0 51.3 51.7 12
Table 2 Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1078 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 1079 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.2 1080 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.9 4.2 4.6 5.0 5.4 5.8 1081 6.2 6.6 7.0 7.4 7.9 8.3 8.8 9.3 9.8 10.3 1082 10.8 11.3 11.8 12.3 12.9 13.4 14.0 14.6 15.2 15.8 1083 16.4 17.0 17.6 18.3 18.9 19.6 20.3 21.0 21.7 22.4 1084 23.1 23.9 24.6 25.4 26.1 26.9 27.7 28.5 29.3 30.1 1085 30.9 31.7 32.6 33.4 34.3 35.1 36.0 36.9 37.8 38.6 1086 39.5 40.5 41.4 42.3 43.2 44.2 45.1 46.1 47.1 48.0 1087 49.0 50.0 51.0 52.0 53.0 54.0 55.1 56.1 57.1 58.2 1088 59.2 60.3 61.4 62.4 63.5 64.6 65.7 66.8 67.9 69.0 1089 70.1 71.3 72.4 73.5 74.7 75.8 77.0 78.2 79.3 80.5 1090 81.7 82.9 84.1 85.3 86.5 87.7 89.0 90.2 91.4 92.7 1091 93.9 95.2 96.5 97.7 99.0 100.3 101.6 102.9 104.2 105.5 1092 106.8 108.1 109.5 110.8 112.1 113.5 114.8 116.2 117.6 119.0 1093 120.4 121.7 123.2 124.6 126.0 127.4 128.9 130.3 131.8 133.2 1094 134.7 136.2 137.6 139.1 140.6 142.1 143.6 145.1 146.6 148.2 1095 149.7 151.2 152.8 154.3 155.9 157.4 159.0 160.6 162.1 163.7 1096 165.3 166.9 168.6 170.2 171.8 173.5 175.1 176.8 178.5 180.2 1097 181.9 183.6 185.3 187.1 188.8 190.6 192.4 194.2 195.9 197.7 1098 199.6 201.4 203.2 205.1 206.9 208.8 210.6 212.5 214.4 216.3 1099 218.2 220.1 222.1 224.0 226.0 227.9 229.9 231.9 233.9 235.9 13
Table 2 Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1100 237.9 239.9 242.0 244.0 246.1 248.2 250.2 252.3 254.4 256.5 1101 258.7 260.8 262.9 265.1 267.2 269.4 271.6 273.8 276.0 278.2 1102 280.5 282.7 285.0 287.2 289.5 291.8 294.1 296.4 298.8 301.1 1103 303.5 305.8 308.2 310.6 313.0 315.4 317.9 320.3 322.8 325.2 1104 327.7 330.2 332.7 335.2 337.8 340.3 342.9 345.4 348.0 350.6 1105 353.3 355.9 358.5 361.2 363.9 366.6 369.3 372.0 374.7 377.4 1106 380.2 382.9 385.7 388.5 391.3 394.1 396.9 399.7 402.6 405.5 1107 408.3 411.2 414.1 417.1 420.0 422.9 425.9 428.9 431.9 434.9 1108 437.9 441.0 444.0 447.1 450.2 453.3 456.4 459.6 462.7 465.9 1109 469.1 472.3 475.5 478.7 481.9 485.2 488.5 491.7 495.0 498.4 1110 501.7 505.0 508.4 511.7 515.1 518.5 521.9 525.3 528.8 532.2 1111 535.7 539.2 542.7 546.2 549.7 553.3 556.9 560.5 564.1 567.7 1112 571.3 575.0 578.6 582.3 586.0 589.7 593.5 597.2 600.9 604.7 1113 608.5 612.3 616.2 620.0 623.9 627.7 631.6 635.5 639.5 643.4 1114 647.4 651.4 655.3 659.4 663.4 667.4 671.5 675.5 679.6 683.7 1115 687.8 691.9 696.1 700.2 704.4 708.6 712.8 717.0 721.2 725.5 1116 729.7 734.0 738.3 742.7 747.0 751.4 755.7 760.1 764.5 769.0 1117 773.4 777.9 782.3 786.8 791.3 795.9 800.4 805.0 809.6 814.2 1118 818.9 823.5 828.2 832.9 837.6 842.3 847.1 851.8 856.6 861.4 1119 866.2 871.0 875.9 880.7 885.6 890.5 895.5 900.4 905.4 910.3 1120 915.3 920.4 925.4 930.5 935.6 940.7 945.9 14
350 300 Cumulative Area (acres) 250 200 150 100 50 0 775 780 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 Elevation (feet) Figure 6. Cumulative area-elevation curve 10000 9000 8000 Cumulative Volume (acre-feet) 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 775 780 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 Elevation (feet) Figure 7. Cumulative volume-elevation curve 15
SEDIMENT SAMPLING PROCEDURES Sediment samples were collected from three sites within the reservoir using a Wildco drop-corer (Wildlife Supply Company, Buffalo, NY). One sample is taken near the dam; a second at mid-lake; and a third in the upper end/transitional area. Sampling was performed on the same day as the bathymetric survey, following completion of the survey. As the drop-corer samples only the upper sediment, the entire sample in each case was collected and sealed in a sampling container. The samples were then shipped to the Kansas State University Soil Testing Laboratory (Manhattan, KS), for texture analysis. SEDIMENT SAMPLING RESULTS: Sampling sites were distributed across the length of the reservoir (Figure 8). Silt percentages were highest at the inflow end (ALMA-3, 60%), decreasing to 34% at the dam end (Table 3; Figure 9; Figure 10). Table 3 Alma City Lake Sediment Sampling Site Data CODE UTMX UTMY %Sand % Silt % Clay ALMA-1 737214.14 4318002.35 0 34 66 ALMA-2 737417.44 4318293.99 0 56 44 ALMA-3 737635.26 4318521.50 6 60 34 Coordinates are Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), NAD83, Zone 14 North 16
Alma City Lake 2010 Sediment Particle Size Analysis 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% CLAY SILT SAND 30% 20% 10% 0% ALMA 1 ALMA 2 ALMA 3 Sample Site Figure 9. Sediment particle size analysis. 17
!.!.!. 0 255 ALMA-3 ALMA-2 ALMA-1 510 1,020 1,530 Figure 8. Location of sediment samples in Alma City Lake 18 Feet 2,040 Ü
Particle Size Distribution Sand ALMA-3 Silt Clay ALMA-2 ALMA-1 0 255 510 1,020 1,530 Feet 2,040 Figure 10. Particle size distribution of sediment samples in Alma City Lake 19 Ü