Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Atchison County Lake, Atchison County, Kansas

Similar documents
Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Centralia City Lake, Nemaha County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Banner Creek Reservoir, Jackson County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Pottawatomie Lake #1, Pottawatomie County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Alma City Lake, Wabaunsee County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Elk City Reservoir, Montgomery County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Fall River Reservoir, Greenwood County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Kanopolis Reservoir, Ellsworth County, Kansas

Bathymetric Survey of John Redmond Reservoir, Coffey County, Kansas

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

StreamStats: Delivering Streamflow Information to the Public. By Kernell Ries

Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis, Chapter 10

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois

Butte County Fire Department

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc.

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

4 Survey Datums. 4.1 Horizontal Datum Policy SURVEY DATUMS SEPTEMBER 2006

Hydrographic Surveys for Six Water Bodies in Eastern Nebraska,

Mobile District River System Status for November 17, 2017

Butte County Fire Department

Natural Variability in Annual Maximum Water Level and Outflow of Yellowstone Lake

This week s topics. Week 6. FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications. Week 6

Sedimentation Survey of Lake Decatur s Basin 6, Macon County, Illinois

Sedimentation Survey of Lake Paradise and Lake Mattoon, Mattoon, Illinois

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Bathymetric Survey of Select Dissolved Oxygen Impaired Reservoirs

Name NRS 409 Exam I. 1. (24 Points) Consider the following questions concerning standard data for GIS systems.

Methods for Assessing Sedimentation in Reservoirs

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

Control Surveys and Coordinate Systems

BUILDING AN ACCURATE GIS

Designing a Dam for Blockhouse Ranch. Haley Born

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Hydrographic Survey Program Texas Water Development Board. Nathan Leber Holly Holmquist Khan Iqbal Josh Duty Eli Pruitt

SHAWN NAYLOR. Research Hydrogeologist Center for Geospatial Data Analysis, Indiana Geological Survey

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Version TNW Only 1 of 3

Delineation of Watersheds

GeoWEPP Tutorial Appendix

What is a Map Projection?

Landslide Computer Modeling Potential

Guide to Hydrologic Information on the Web

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Improvement of the National Hydrography Dataset for US Forest Service Region 3 in Cooperation with the National Forest Service

History of Cartography,

ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

ENTERGY WHITE BLUFF PLANT RECYCLE POND A AND RECYCLE POND B DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA 257.

Detroit 516 Activities

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2008 There are 4 questions on this exam. Please do all 4.

Bathymetric Survey of Select Dissolved Oxygen Impaired Reservoirs

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Internet GIS Sites. 2 OakMapper webgis Application

Adam Munson, Environmental Scientist III Resource Conservation and Development Department Southwest Florida Water Management District

Mobile District River System Status for October 25, 2018

GIS in Water Resources Fall 2018 Homework #1

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

LiDAR User Data Needs Survey Results

APPENDIX A GLOSSARY. Appendix A.1

Glossary. ARC: American Red Cross. ASOS: Automated Surface Observing System (NWS & FAA) ATM: Abbreviated Transportation Model

Understanding China Census Data with GIS By Shuming Bao and Susan Haynie China Data Center, University of Michigan

Merced Irrigation District Hydrologic and Hydraulic Operations (MIDH2O) Model

Alluvial Soils: Fine grained sediment, especially of mud or clay particles at the bottom of a river or lake.

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

Geospatial Data, Services, and Products. National Surveying, mapping and geospatial conference

B. Topographic maps are also called. contour maps

Climate. Annual Temperature (Last 30 Years) January Temperature. July Temperature. Average Precipitation (Last 30 Years)

Section 4: Model Development and Application

SLOSH New Orleans Basin 2012 Update

USGS Flood Inundation Mapping of the Suncook River in Chichester, Epsom, Pembroke and Allenstown, New Hampshire

UAV APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING. Presented By Wohnrade Civil Engineers, Inc.

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

Illinois River Sediment Quality and Beneficial Use Options

Topographic Maps and Landforms Geology Lab

ArcGIS Data Reviewer: Quality Assessment for Elevation Raster Datasets. Roslyn Dunn

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

Lake Champlain Richelieu River Flood Inundation Mapping and Forecasting Tool

Giant Kangaroo Rat Dispersion Analysis

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

Esri Image & Mapping Forum 9 July 2017 Geiger-Mode for Conservation Planning & Design by USDA NRCS NGCE

The Coastal Change Analysis Program and the Land Cover Atlas. Rebecca Love NOAA Office for Coastal Management

ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT EAST AND WEST RECYCLE PONDS DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA , FAULT AREAS.

Big Wood River. General Information

NAVAJO NATION PROFILE

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# )

Modeling Hydrodynamic Effects and Salinity Intrusion. Presented by Dr. Eric Swain, USGS Water Science Center, Fort Lauderdale Florida

APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL ABSOLUTE WATER STORAGE RIGHT

Transcription:

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Atchison County Lake, Atchison County, Kansas Kansas Biological Survey Applied Science and Technology for Reservoir Assessment (ASTRA) Program Report 2010-04 (November 2010)

This work was funded by the Kansas Water Office through the State Water Plan Fund in support of the Reservoir Sustainability Initiative.

SUMMARY Summary Data: Bathymetric Survey: Reservoir Statistics: Elevation Benchmark (if applicable) Sediment Survey:

TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION BATHYMETRIC SURVEYING PROCEDURE BATHYMETRIC SURVEY RESULTS SEDIMENT SAMPLING ii

LIST OF FIGURES iii

LIST OF TABLES iv

LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION Figure 1. Atchison County Lake, Atchison County, Kansas. 1

Atchison County, Kansas Atchison County Lake Horton Huron Muscotah Lancaster Atchison Effingham Nortonville Ü Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Figure 2. Location of Atchison County Lake in Atchison County, Kansas. 2

Reservoir Bathymetric (Depth) Surveying Procedures Pre-survey preparation: Geospatial reference data: Survey procedures: Calibration (Temperature and ball check): On-lake survey procedures: 3

Establishment Of Lake Level On Survey Dates: Atchison County Lake: 4

Location of Lake Elevation Benchmark: 5

USGS Home Contact USGS Search USGS National Water Information System: Web Interface USGS Water Resources Data Category: Site Information Geographic Area: United States GO News New Real-Time and Site Web Services! - updated August 26, 2010 USGS 393806095273700 ATCHISON CO LK NR HORTON, KS Lake Site Available data for this site SUMMARY OF ALL AVAILABLE DATA DESCRIPTION: Latitude 39 38'06", Longitude 95 27'37" NAD83 Atchison County, Kansas, Hydrologic Unit 10270103 Drainage area: 9.35 square miles Datum of gage: 1,050.00 feet above sea level NAVD88. AVAILABLE DATA: Data Type Begin Date End Date Count Real-time -- Previous 120 days -- Field measurements 2009-03-24 2010-09-22 16 Field/Lab water-quality samples 2009-03-24 2010-09-22 20 OPERATION: Record for this site is maintained by the USGS Kansas Water Science Center Email questions about this site to Kansas Water Science Center Water-Data Inquiries GO Questions about sites/data? Feedback on this web site Automated retrievals Help Top Explanation of terms Subscribe for system changes News Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Title: ** USGS 393806095273700 ATCHISON CO LK NR HORTON, KS URL: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/nwisman? Page Contact Information: Kansas Water Data Support Team Page Last Modified: 2010-11-15 14:08:52 EST 0.68 0.67 caww02 6

0 0.2 0.4 Miles Ü Figure 4. Bathymetric survey lines for Atchison County Lake 7

Post-processing (Visual Bottom Typer) The BioSonics, Inc. bottom tracker is an end_up" algorithm, in that it begins searching for the bottom echo portion of a ping from the last sample toward the first sample. The bottom tracker tracks the bottom echo by isolating the region(s) where the data exceeds a peak threshold for N consecutive samples, then drops below a surface threshold for M samples. Once a bottom echo has been identified, a bottom sampling window is used to find the next echo. The bottom echo is first isolated by user_defined threshold values that indicate (1) the lowest energy to include in the bottom echo (bottom detection threshold) and (2) the lowest energy to start looking for a bottom peak (peak threshold). The bottom detection threshold allows the user to filter out noise caused by a low data acquisition threshold. The peak threshold prevents the algorithm from identifying the small energy echoes (due to fish, sediment or plant life) as a bottom echo. Post-processing (Excel) 8

NOT Post-processing (ArcGIS): 9

Depth in Feet 0.00-1 1.01-2 2.01-3 3.01-4 4.01-5 5.01-6 6.01-7 1 ft Contours 0 0.2 0.4 Miles Ü Figure 5. Water depth based on November 12, 2009 bathymetric surveys for Atchison County Lake. Depths are based on a pool elevation of 1055.48 ft. 10

Table 1 Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1049 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1050 1.0 2.6 4.6 6.9 9.2 10.9 12.3 13.4 14.6 15.4 1051 16.3 17.1 18.0 18.8 19.6 20.4 21.3 22.2 22.9 23.7 1052 24.4 25.1 25.8 26.5 27.2 28.1 29.0 29.9 30.8 31.9 1053 33.3 34.7 36.6 38.6 41.0 43.5 44.8 45.8 46.8 47.9 1054 48.8 49.8 50.9 51.9 52.7 53.6 54.5 55.4 56.3 57.2 1055 58.1 59.0 60.0 61.1 62.5 64.3 Table 2 Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1049 0.1 0.1 1050 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.0 3.0 4.2 5.5 6.9 8.4 1051 10.0 11.7 13.4 15.2 17.2 19.2 21.3 23.4 25.7 28.0 1052 30.4 32.9 35.4 38.1 40.7 43.5 46.4 49.3 52.3 55.5 1053 58.7 62.1 65.7 69.5 73.4 77.7 82.1 86.6 91.3 96.0 1054 100.8 105.8 110.8 116.0 121.2 126.5 131.9 137.4 143.0 148.7 1055 154.5 160.3 166.3 172.4 178.6 184.9

Cumulative Area (acres) Elevation (feet) Figure 6. Cumulative area-elevation curve Cumulative Volume (acre-feet) Figure 7. Cumulative volume-elevation curve Elevation (feet) 12

SEDIMENT SAMPLING PROCEDURES Sediment samples were collected from three sites within the reservoir using a Wildco drop-corer (Wildlife Supply Company, Buffalo, NY). One sample is taken near the dam; a second at mid-lake; and a third in the upper end/transitional area. Sampling was performed on the same day as the bathymetric survey, following completion of the survey. As the drop-corer samples only the upper sediment, the entire sample in each case was collected and sealed in a sampling container. The samples were then shipped to the Kansas State University Soil Testing Laboratory (Manhattan, KS), for texture analysis. SEDIMENT SAMPLING RESULTS: Sampling sites were distributed across the length of the reservoir (Figure 8). Silt percentages were highest at the inflow end (ATCH-2, 70%), decreasing to 12% at the dam end (Table 3; Figure 9; Figure 10). Table 3 Atchison County Lake Sediment Sampling Site Data CODE UTMX UTMY %Sand % Silt % Clay ATCH-1 289114.6875 4390501.632 0 38 62 ATCH-2 289401.9626 4390673.731 2 70 28 ATCH-3 288869.7353 4390150.646 16 12 72 Coordinates are Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), NAD83, Zone 15 North

!. ATCH-2!. ATCH-1!. ATCH-3 0 0.2 0.4 Miles Ü Figure 8. Location of sediment samples in Atchinson County Lake 14

Atchison County Lake 2010 Sediment Particle Size Analysis Sample Site 15

ATCH-2 ATCH-1 ATCH-3 Particle Size Distribution Sand Silt Clay 0 0.2 0.4 Miles Ü Figure 10. Particle size distribution of sediment samples in Atchison County Lake 16