NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Similar documents
Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

POLICY MANUAL. Hamlets/Residential named hamlets within the County of Grande Prairie whose roads are hard surfaced.

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

FOR SALE. Chapel Lane, West Ella, East Yorkshire, HU10 7SE RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION AND NEW BUILD OPPORTUNITY

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON

BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013)

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE

City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

Snow and Ice Removal

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

DESIGN BULLETIN No. 39/2006 (Revised June 2007) June 2007 Amendment to Design Bulletin #39/2006

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3

REPORT OF PHYSICAL EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Section 15 - Mineral Tenure Act Regulation

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

The results of KCB s site inspection observations and our recommendations for further work are presented herein.

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report

VIKING INSPECTION PROPERTY 4921 U.S. Hwy. 85, Williston, ND 58801

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Geotechnical Completion Report Knights Stream Park Stage3A Development (Lots 107 to 148)

Policy Title: Snow Removal & Ice Control Policy #: PW

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

Re: Draft OPA 320 Recommended Amendments to Various Neighbourhood Policies Statutory Public Meeting to be held on Monday 16 November 2015

Engineer's Report. Main Street Business Area. Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year )

GUIDELINES FOR FILMING IN TOMBALL, TEXAS

EXHIBIT H LOT 317 GRADING AND SITE PLAN

For personal use only OZ MINERALS CARRAPATEENA COPPER GOLD PROJECT SOUTH AUSTRALIA 27 MARCH 2012

INVESTORS AND CAPITAL MARKETS DAY O c t o b e r 15-16, 2015

Appendix C Benchmarking Cost Estimates

Superstorm Sandy Willis Re s post-event field damage survey preliminary report

February 22, 2016 AG File No

August 10, 2007 File:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Committee Meeting November 6, 2018

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX

KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential. R-2 Medium Density Residential. R-3 High Density Residential. S-C Service Commercial. D-C Downtown Commercial

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008

COPPER RANCH SKETCH PLAN

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services

Vehicle Motion Equations:

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO

VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CLOSING DATE:

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

DRAFT. PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA. Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835

AGGREGATE RESOURCES OF ONTARIO (ARO) METADATA

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?

Historic Cultural Properties Inventory (HCPI) Base Form (FORM 1)

Rock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope

Table 1 - Infiltration Rates

Auckland Transport. Auckland Council. Statement of Evidence of Simon John Ferneyhough

Traffic Impact Study

That Council give first three readings to District of Squamish Cemetery Bylaw No , Amendment Bylaw No. 1931, 2006

Resolution Number: (2) Resolution Title: Snow Policy Date Signed: 11/26/12. DAVIS COUNTY Snow Policy Resolution

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Test code for machine tools Part 5: Determination of the noise emission

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

Transcription:

Smart Property Advisors Ltd. 802-500 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared by: SMART PROPERTY ADVISORS LTD. 802 500 Laurier Avenue West 613 868 8015 tel1 Ottawa, ON 613 601 8333 tel2 Project Number: 2013 03 100 Date: JULY 2013

Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND... 1 3.0 NOISE SOURCES... 1 4.0 NOISE RECEPTORS... 1 5.0 NOISE LEVELS AT RECEPTORS... 2 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS... 2 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D Site Location STAMSON Output Files Noise Plan Building Elevation View and Floorplans

Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the Report ) has been prepared by Smart Property Advisors Ltd. ( Consultant ) for the benefit of the client ( Client ) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the Agreement ). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the Information ): is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the Limitations ); represents Consultant s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified; has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time. Consultant agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the Agreement, but Consultant makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the information or any part thereof. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since Consultant has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, Consultant, its directors, officers and employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising there from or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except (1) as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. Consultant accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the Information ( improper use of the Report ), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use. This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof.

Distribution List # of Hard Copies PDF Required Association/Company Name 1 YES NMR Engineering Revision Log Revision # Revised By Date Issue/Revision Description 0 SB/MJT 07/16/2013 Issued for Submission Smart Property Advisors Signatures Report Prepared By: Shawn Bhatia. P.Eng., M.Eng. Report Reviewed By: Michael J. Thivierge, P.Eng., P.E. Stamp

1.0 INTRODUCTION This noise report was prepared for the proposed Isabella Street residential building at 114 Isabella in Ottawa, ON. The purpose of this report is to assess the sound levels resulting from potential noise sources and makes recommendations per the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG). This report is being submitted on behalf of the developer, NMR Engineering, in support of the proposed site plan control application. 2.0 BACKGROUND The subject land is bounded by existing residential building to the East (Retirement Life Community), Isabella Street to the North, an existing restaurant to the West and existing residential to the South. The land is currently vacant. Figure 1 (in Appendix A) shows the site location. 3.0 NOISE SOURCES The first noise source used in this study was Isabella Street, which is identified in the Transportation Master Plan as a one way 2 lane urban arterial road with an annual average daily traffic volume of 7,500 vehicles per day with an assumed 92% of traffic occurring during the day and 8% at night. The traffic volume is assumed to have 7% medium truck traffic and 5% heavy truck traffic. Isabella Street has a posted speed limit is 50 km/hr. The second noise source used in this study was highway 417, which consists of 6 lane divided roadway, with an annual average daily traffic volume of 18,333 vehicles per day per lane. The traffic volume was divided into 3 eastbound lanes and 3 westbound lanes. The day/night traffic split as well as truck traffic percentages are as described above and conform to the City of Ottawa ENCG. The highway posted speed limit is 100 km/hr. The highway is approximately 7 meters higher than the base of the proposed building. Noise source height used was 1.5m. There are no airports or aircraft noises that could affect the development. 4.0 NOISE RECEPTORS The noise receptor for the outdoor living area (OLA) condition was taken 3m from the back of building and at 1.5m in height. There are no balconies to be considered as OLA. For the indoor conditions, the receptor was located on the front face of the building. The receptor heights of 2.5m for daytime (living room) and 4.5m for nighttime (bed room), were selected. The elevation view and floor plans of the proposed building are included in the Appendix D.

5.0 NOISE LEVELS AT RECEPTORS Noise levels were determined at the critical receptor locations using STAMSON 5.0 modelling software. Appendix B contains the software output reports. The Leq 16hr and Leq 8hr results of the model can be summarized in the table below. Table 5.1: MODEL OUTPUT Indoor Day (2.5m) Indoor Night (4.5m) OLA (1.5m) dba dba dba Proposed Building 74.43 68.49 65.38 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The building has Leq 16hr and Leq 8hr values that are higher than 65 dba and 60 dba respectively so mitigation measures are required. It is recommended that air conditioning be provided. Additionally, building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria. A few examples of building component considerations are: Acoustic treatment of walls and roof; Selection of windows and doors; Installation of sound reducing fittings in ducts and opening to the outside. Additionally, it is recommended that a type D warning clause is registered on title and is added to all future leases and purchase and sale agreements. The type D warning clause is as follows: "This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment's noise criteria." The building has an OLA noise level greater than 60 dba so mitigation measures were investigated. With a barrier along the front lot line, the noise level is marginally reduced. The table below summarizes the effects of the front barrier height on OLA noise level reduction. 114 Isabella Street Noise Report July 2013 Page 2

Table 5.2: FRONT BARRIER HEIGHT VS OLA Barrier Height OLA (1.5m) (m) (dba) 3 65.29 4 65.25 5 65.24 10 53.47 Since the required barrier height was above 4.5m, alternative noise mitigation measures were investigated. Drastically lowering the site grading to allow the OLA to be within the shadow zone requires extensive excavation and retaining wall installation and is therefore not considered an option. Extending the back building face to reduce the angle of exposed road segment is also not possible due to the current proposed rear yard already being only 3 meters. A 3m noise fence located 3m from the rear lot line reduces the OLA noise level to 58.23 dba. The table below summarizes the effects of the rear barrier height on OLA noise level reduction. Table 5.3: REAR BARRIER HEIGHT VS OLA Barrier Height OLA (1.5m) (m) (dba) 3 58.23 3.2 57.16 3.4 56.20 3.6 55.34 3.7 54.96 To reduce the OLA noise level to 55 dba, the developer would have to provide a 3.7m noise fence between the parking area and the OLA. Tuf Barrier noise fence as manufactured by Atlantic Industries Ltd (or equivalent) is recommended for installation and use. We trust this is satisfactory, Michael J Thivierge, P.Eng 114 Isabella Street Noise Report July 2013 Page 3

APPENDIX A (Figure 1 Site location)

SITE LOCATION

APPENDIX B (STAMSON output files)

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 13 07 2013 23:06:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: isab_in.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Indoor Noise Levels Road data, segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 54999 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

Data for Segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 70.00 deg 79.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 37.00 / 37.00 m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : 70.00 deg Angle2 : 79.00 deg : 1.00 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 32.00 / 32.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : 75.50 m : 67.00 m : 74.00 m Reference angle : 0.00

Road data, segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 54999 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 70.00 deg 79.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

Receiver source distance : 47.00 / 47.00 m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : 70.00 deg Angle2 : 79.00 deg : 1.00 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 32.00 / 32.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : 75.50 m : 67.00 m : 74.00 m Reference angle : 0.00

Road data, segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 70.00 deg 79.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00

Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 2.50! 1.98! 75.98 ROAD (0.00 + 73.14 + 0.00) = 73.14 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 70 79 0.36 80.15 0.00 5.33 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.50 72.96* 70 79 0.42 80.15 0.00 5.57 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.14 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 73.14 dba

Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 2.50! 0.60! 74.60 ROAD (0.00 + 66.76 + 0.00) = 66.76 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 70 79 0.36 80.15 0.00 6.75 1.35 0.00 0.00 5.28 66.76 Segment Leq : 66.76 dba

Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 63.76 + 0.00) = 63.76 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 70 79 0.63 65.47 0.00 0.00 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.76 Segment Leq : 63.76 dba Total Leq All Segments: 74.43 dba

Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 4.50! 2.25! 76.25 ROAD (0.00 + 65.86 + 0.00) = 65.86 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 70 79 0.30 72.55 0.00 5.10 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.11 66.07* 70 79 0.36 72.55 0.00 5.33 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.86 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 65.86 dba

Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 4.50! 1.24! 75.24 ROAD (0.00 + 64.45 + 0.00) = 64.45 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 70 79 0.30 72.55 0.00 6.45 1.27 0.00 0.00 4.89 59.94* 70 79 0.36 72.55 0.00 6.75 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.45 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 64.45 dba

Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 56.24 + 0.00) = 56.24 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 70 79 0.57 57.87 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.24 Segment Leq : 56.24 dba Total Leq All Segments: 68.49 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 74.43 (NIGHT): 68.49

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 13 07 2013 23:09:48 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: thola.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Outdoor Noise Levels Road data, segment # 1: Baskin N (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

Data for Segment # 1: Baskin N (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 19.75 / 19.75 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00

Road data, segment # 2: Baskin S (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Baskin S (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

Receiver source distance : 28.25 / 28.25 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00

Results segment # 1: Baskin N (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 62.03 + 0.00) = 62.03 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 90 90 0.66 65.47 0.00 1.98 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.03 Segment Leq : 62.03 dba

Results segment # 2: Baskin S (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 59.45 + 0.00) = 59.45 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 90 90 0.66 65.47 0.00 4.56 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.45 Segment Leq : 59.45 dba Total Leq All Segments: 63.94 dba

Results segment # 1: Baskin N (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 54.69 + 0.00) = 54.69 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 90 90 0.57 57.87 0.00 1.88 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.69 Segment Leq : 54.69 dba

Results segment # 2: Baskin S (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 52.25 + 0.00) = 52.25 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 90 90 0.57 57.87 0.00 4.32 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.25 Segment Leq : 52.25 dba Total Leq All Segments: 56.65 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.94 (NIGHT): 56.65

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 13 07 2013 23:11:21 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: isa_barr.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Outdoor Noise Level w/barrier Road data, segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 54999 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

Data for Segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 25.00 deg 25.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 1 House density : 20 % Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 65.00 / 65.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : 25.00 deg Angle2 : 25.00 deg : 3.70 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : 75.50 m : 67.00 m : 67.00 m Reference angle : 0.00

Road data, segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 54999 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 25.00 deg 25.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

Receiver source distance : 75.00 / 75.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : 25.00 deg Angle2 : 25.00 deg : 3.70 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : 75.50 m : 67.00 m : 67.00 m Reference angle : 0.00

Road data, segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 25.00 deg 25.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

Receiver source distance : 37.50 / 37.50 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height : 25.00 deg Angle2 : 25.00 deg : 3.70 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : 68.50 m : 67.00 m : 67.00 m Reference angle : 0.00

Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 1.50! 1.89! 68.89 ROAD (0.00 + 52.33 + 0.00) = 52.33 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 25 25 0.23 80.15 0.00 7.82 5.59 0.00 0.00 14.40 52.33 Segment Leq : 52.33 dba

Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 1.50! 1.84! 68.84 ROAD (0.00 + 51.32 + 0.00) = 51.32 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 25 25 0.23 80.15 0.00 8.58 5.59 0.00 0.00 14.65 51.32 Segment Leq : 51.32 dba

Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 1.50! 1.62! 68.62 ROAD (0.00 + 38.19 + 0.00) = 38.19 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 25 25 0.44 65.47 0.00 5.72 5.62 0.00 0.00 15.94 38.19 Segment Leq : 38.19 dba Total Leq All Segments: 54.96 dba

Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 4.50! 4.75! 71.75 ROAD (0.00 + 57.38 + 0.00) = 57.38 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 25 25 0.36 72.55 0.00 8.66 5.61 0.00 0.90 0.00 57.38 25 25 0.14 72.55 0.00 7.25 5.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.72* 25 25 0.36 72.55 0.00 8.66 5.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.28 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 57.38 dba

Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 4.50! 4.72! 71.72 ROAD (0.00 + 57.43 + 0.00) = 57.43 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 25 25 0.14 72.55 0.00 7.96 5.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.01* 25 25 0.36 72.55 0.00 9.51 5.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.43 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 57.43 dba

Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) + + + 1.50! 4.50! 4.38! 71.38 ROAD (0.00 + 45.98 + 0.00) = 45.98 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq 25 25 0.35 57.87 0.00 5.36 5.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.90* 25 25 0.57 57.87 0.00 6.25 5.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.98 * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : 45.98 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.57 dba

TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 54.96 (NIGHT): 60.57

APPENDIX C (Noise Plan)

APPENDIX D (Building elevation view and floorplans)