CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF POPULATION AND HOUSING FUND BETWEEN TWO CENSUSES 1 - South Muntenia Development Region

Similar documents
Analysis of travel-to-work patterns and the identification and classification of REDZs

Navigable maritime and river waterways in the seaside - Danube Delta area and the connected rural development

A Case Study of Regional Dynamics of China 中国区域动态案例研究

CHAPTER 3 POPULATION AND CULTURE SECTION 1: THE STUDY OF HUMAN GEOGRAPHY

A POLYCENTRIC APPROACH FOR AN EFFECTIVE URBAN SYSTEMATIZATION OF BUCHAREST

ROMANIA S TOURISTIC REGIONALIZATION - TOURISTIC DEVELOPMENT INDICATOR -

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Links between socio-economic and ethnic segregation at different spatial scales: a comparison between The Netherlands and Belgium

Experience and perspectives of using EU funds and other funding for the implementation of district renovation projects

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

MICRO-SCALE GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT. CASE STUDY: MOUNTAINOUS AND SUB- CARPATHIAN AREA OF IALOMIŢA HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

URBAN SPRAWL THE LEGAL CONTEXT AND TERRITORIAL PRACTICES IN ROMANIA

Advanced Placement Human Geography

The National Spatial Strategy

The Governance of Land Use

Summary and Implications for Policy

2. Defining fisheries areas

Subunit 4.1: 2.5 hours. Subunit 4.2: 2.75 hours. Subunit 4.3: 1.5 hours. Subunit 4.4: 3.5 hours. Subunit 4.5: 1.5 hours Unit 4 Learning Outcomes close

Contract title: Technical assistance for multi-annual programming of future cross border cooperation programme in the Romania-Serbia cooperation area

USING DOWNSCALED POPULATION IN LOCAL DATA GENERATION

PURR: POTENTIAL OF RURAL REGIONS UK ESPON WORKSHOP Newcastle 23 rd November Neil Adams

Operational Definitions of Urban, Rural and Urban Agglomeration for Monitoring Human Settlements

New Prospects for Peripheral Rural Regions Helmut Hiess Glasgow, 19th of May 2010

STRATEGIC MODEL FOR ATTENUATING RURAL INEQUITIES IN SOUTH-MUNTENIA REGION

Making space for a more foundational construction sector in Brussels

May kindly Tim Page prepare the Bulgaria page header with the same design as the others? Bulgaria Urban Region of Sofia

European Regional and Urban Statistics

RESIDENTIAL AREA DYNAMICS AND IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT COMPONENTS IN PITESTI

SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF URBAN POPULATION GROWTH AND DISTRIBUTION IN AURANGABAD CITY

APPLIED FIELDWORK ENQUIRY SAMPLE ASSESSMENT MATERIALS

Topic 4: Changing cities

Improving rural statistics. Defining rural territories and key indicators of rural development

Donatas Burneika, Ruta Ubareviciene (Institute of geology and geography, Vilnius)

1 Business Development

The international patterns of spatial planning system and choice of China. Cai yumei China land use planning and surveying institute (China, beijing)

Chapter 10 Human Settlement Geography Book 1 Class 12

Changes in population and industries in the rural areas of Finland: from analysis of administrative regions to a GIS based approach

Unit 8 Settlement Geography: Urban and Rural, Cities and City Life

Summary and Statistical Report of the 2007 Population and Housing Census Results 1

BUCHAREST METROPOLITAN AREA AND ITS EXTERNAL HINTERLAND: SPREAD OR BACKWASH EFFECTS?

THE IMPACT OF LANDSLIDE AREAS ON MUNICIPAL SPATIAL PLANNING

ESPON evidence on European cities and metropolitan areas

STAAR Vocabulary Words extracted directly from the standard and/or associated with the instruction of the content within the standard.

Understanding Your Community A Guide to Data

Curriculum Unit. Instructional Unit #1

Spotlight on Population Resources for Geography Teachers. Pat Beeson, Education Services, Australian Bureau of Statistics

Understanding China Census Data with GIS By Shuming Bao and Susan Haynie China Data Center, University of Michigan

Population Change and Spatial Transformation in The Netherlands

Local Development Pilot Project: Island of Cres. Ranka Saračević Würth, Ministry of Culture, Republic of Croatia

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

A Review of Concept of Peri-urban Area & Its Identification

From individual perceptions and statistical data to instruments for land resource management

RURAL AND URBAN MUNICIPALITIES IN THE REGIONS OF LATVIA DEVELOPMENT TENDENCIES AND CHALLENGES

Difference in regional productivity and unbalance in regional growth

How the science of cities can help European policy makers: new analysis and perspectives

WORLD GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTIONAL PACING GUIDE

AP Human Geography AP EXAM Free Response Questions and Possible Future Questions

AP Human Geography Free-response Questions

State initiative following up the 2006 national planning report

A Markov system analysis application on labour market dynamics: The case of Greece

Monitoring of regional development in the Alps by means of indicators

Social Studies Grade 2 - Building a Society

European Landscape Convention in the Slovak Republic

Assessing Social Vulnerability to Biophysical Hazards. Dr. Jasmine Waddell

DETERMINE OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN IZMIR

AP Human Geography Free Response Questions Categorized

APPENDIX V VALLEYWIDE REPORT

Riocan Centre Study Area Frontenac Mall Study Area Kingston Centre Study Area

Arkansas Retiree In-Migration: A Regional Analysis

TOWARDS STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING IN JAMAICA: THE NATIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

R E SEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

INDIANA ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR SOCIAL STUDIES, WORLD GEOGRAPHY. PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

2nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILT ENVIRONMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (ICBEDC 2008)

AP Human Geography Unit 7a: Services Guided Reading Mr. Stepek Introduction (Rubenstein p ) 1. What is the tertiary sector of the economy?

TOWNs in Europe. Loris Servillo. Luxemburg, 12 December 2014

A.P. Human Geography

Dr. Emily A. Fogarty, Coordinator History, Politics and Geography Dept School of Arts & Sciences

BUILDING SOUND AND COMPARABLE METRICS FOR SDGS: THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE OECD DATA AND TOOLS FOR CITIES AND REGIONS

Labour Market Areas in Italy. Sandro Cruciani Istat, Italian National Statistical Institute Directorate for territorial and environmental statistics

US Census Bureau Geographic Entities and Concepts. Geography Division

Effects of a non-motorized transport infrastructure development in the Bucharest metropolitan area

Spatial Organization of Data and Data Extraction from Maptitude

Frontier and Remote (FAR) Area Codes: A Preliminary View of Upcoming Changes John Cromartie Economic Research Service, USDA

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

OPINION. Results of EU Structural Policy in NSPA

ANALYZING CITIES & POPULATION: POPULATION GEOGRAPHY

INSTITUTE OF TOWN PLANNERS, INDIA TOWN PLANNING EXAMINATION BOARD ASSOCIATESHIP EXAMINATION

UNCTAD Single-year Expert Meeting on Tourism s Contribution to Sustainable Development

Population Change. Alessandro Alasia Agriculture Division Statistics Canada. (ICRPS) Summer School 2009

Downloaded from

The Shape of the Territorial-Administrative Systems from the North-Western Region

Cross-border Maritime Spatial Plan for the Black sea - Romania and Bulgaria project

Geographic Boundaries of Population Census of Japan 1

Are EU Rural Areas still Lagging behind Urban Regions? An Analysis through Fuzzy Logic

Measured & Perceived Sustainability

GEOGRAPHY POLICY STATEMENT. The study of geography helps our pupils to make sense of the world around them.

It is clearly necessary to introduce some of the difficulties of defining rural and

Chapter 12. Key Issue Three: Why do business services locate in large settlements?

Rural Pennsylvania: Where Is It Anyway? A Compendium of the Definitions of Rural and Rationale for Their Use

Transcription:

TERITORIAL STATISTICS CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF POPULATION AND HOUSING FUND BETWEEN TWO CENSUSES 1 - South Muntenia Development Region PhD Senior Lecturer Nicu MARCU In the last decade, a series of structural changes took place in our country with regard to the whole society, mainly in the economic and the social area. Changes occurred in the number and the structure of the living at a specific time. Whether we refer to the residence environment, gender or employment status as recorded in the Population and Housing Census of 18 March 2002 in the villages, towns, municipalities and counties - as administrative and territorial units, and also in the developing regions, the changes result from official statistical data and information published in the last ten years. In this context it was considered useful and important to present the changes in the structure of and housing fund, first, in one of the eight development regions of Romania - regions formed in accordance with the measures, projects and EU requirements, and provisions of law no.315/2004. We refer to the situation in South Muntenia Region, a development region that consists in a number of seven counties. It is the only development region of the country that consists of two counties: Calarasi and Giurgiu established in the early 80 s. Other counties in the region were established according to the administrative organization of the territory law no.2/1968: Arges, Dambovita, Ialomita, Prahova, Teleorman counties. South Muntenia Development Region has the municipality Calarasi as county seat. The region holds 14.5% of the total country area, being the third largest region after North East and South- East regions. The region is very diverse in terms of land: low areas along the Danube River in different river valleys, hills and mountains, and soil and subsoil resources have provided conditions for development. The region has many known urban centers: cities and municipalities with a significant housing fund, popular tourist areas. As a model of evolution, the number was characterized for many years and is still characterized by demographic regression and aging, high percentage of people living in rural areas plus a high external mobility. 1 With reference to the Population and Housing Census of 18 March 2002 and that of 20 /31 October 2011. In accordance with the established observation schedule by this year s and housing census, comprehensive and useful data and information on the number and territorial distribution of, demographic structure and other characteristics is to be obtained as well as territorial distribution and use of housing fund.

Depending on the geographical configuration of different areas, the number of spread over the years is fairly uniform (in plains, hills and mountain areas), presenting recurrent and important changes, mainly between rural and urban areas and also depending on other specific characteristics, in the structure: age groups, for example. Population South Muntenia Development Region consists of 16 municipalities, 48 cities, and 519 parishes with 2019 villages. Counties Area (kmp) Number of Number of Number of Municipalities cities parishes villages Argeş 6.826 7 3 95 576 Călăraşi 5.088 5 2 50 160 Dâmboviţa 4.054 7 2 82 353 Giurgiu 3.526 3 1 51 167 Ialomiţa 4.453 7 3 59 127 Prahova 4.716 14 2 90 405 Teleorman 5.790 5 3 92 231 According to the recent statistical data, in terms of ethnic composition of the, the South Muntenia Region includes: Romanian majority : 96.9% of the region s ; National minorities: 3.1%, of which: Roma: 2.9% By religion, 97.8% of the region s was Orthodox, the difference being: other communions, atheists and non-religious. For South Muntenia Development Region, we will make reference, starting with 2000, to the decline that characterizes the entire country, based on the official statistical data and information. Since the Population and Housing Census in March 2002, each year, by 1 January 2011, the region s declined continuously and we will have a new confirmation after the completion and publication of the results from the records of this year s and housing census, to be held between 20 to 31October. Revista Română de Statistică nr. 10 / 2011

Total Region Arges Călărasi Dâmbovita Giurgiu Ialomita Prahova Teleorman Population number by gender and area in different years (2000-2010) Year 2000 2002 2005 2008 2009 2010 3465468 3374916 3329762 3284525 3271207 3258775 M 1696073 1649979 1625399 1602014 1594459 1587863 F 1769395 1724937 1704363 1682511 1676748 1670912 Urban 1441088 1371613 1388708 1359191 1355452 1350399 Rural 2024380 2003303 1941054 1925334 1915755 1908376 671514 652950 646320 643762 640871 639157 M 328440 318155 314318 313991 311955 310890 F 343074 334795 332002 329771 328916 328267 Urban 321662 303736 311236 306496 305465 304615 Rural 349852 349214 335084 337266 335406 334542 331843 320387 317652 313626 312879 311898 M 163658 157884 156130 153682 153153 152708 F 168185 162503 161522 159944 159726 159190 Urban 130188 124321 124149 120358 120483 120373 Rural 201655 196066 193503 193268 192396 191525 551414 541431 537090 530849 530354 529781 M 269992 264816 262511 258851 258556 258357 F 281422 276615 274579 271998 271798 271424 Urban 172133 162690 168027 164242 163303 162985 Rural 379281 378741 369063 366607 366751 366796 294000 291784 286208 282554 281204 280125 M 143358 142435 139540 137893 137182 136682 F 150642 149349 146668 144661 144022 143443 Urban 90470 90022 89012 87602 87608 87420 Rural 203530 201762 197196 194952 193596 192705 304327 294757 292666 288725 287780 286980 M 150053 145162 143772 141464 140970 140465 F 154274 149595 148894 147261 146810 146515 Urban 125455 118026 133578 132279 132339 132265 Rural 178872 176731 159088 156446 155441 154715 855539 835745 827512 817632 815657 812844 M 415811 406077 401640 396229 395252 393568 F 439728 429668 425872 421403 420405 419276 Urban 444239 427134 420822 412204 410734 408649 Rural 411300 408611 406690 405428 404923 404195 456831 437862 422314 407377 402462 397990 M 224761 215450 207488 199904 197391 195193 F 232070 222412 214826 207473 205071 202797 Urban 156941 145684 141884 136010 135220 134092 Rural 299890 292178 280430 271367 267242 263898

Within South Muntenia Development Region, in this time period, the number decreased by 206 693 inhabitants. The biggest decrease was recorded in Teleorman County where the has decreased (from 1 January 2011) by 58 841 inhabitants compared with the data collected from 1 January 2000, followed by Prahova County (- 42 965 inhabitants) and Arges County (- 32 357 inhabitants). The smallest decrease was recorded in Giurgiu County (- 13875 inhabitants). In terms of gender distribution, the region s is 49% men and 51% women. The structure by residential area was characterized by the migration of the from town to village, especially since in this period, several parishes were declared cities. The phenomenon can be explained in the case of southern counties, by the lack of opportunities in accessing a sufficient social status in urban areas, the rural areas being preferred for the low habitual costs and for the options to practice subsistence agriculture and tourism in different areas. The structure of South Muntenia Development Region by residence areas consists of 59% rural area and 41% urban area. Prahova County is the only county in the region with a predominantly urban, compared to other counties where there the is predominantly rural. Dâmboviţa and Giurgiu counties single out with 69% rural. Labour market evolution Occupied and the average number of employees were situated on a descending trend both in value and as percentage. In Arges and Prahova counties, in 2009 approximately 22% of the was employed. In Teleorman (13%) and in Giurgiu (12%) of the total had a job. Revista Română de Statistică nr. 10 / 2011

Total Region Argeş Călăraşi Dâmboviţa Giurgiu Ialomiţa Prahova Teleorman Number of occupied, employed and unemployed in different years (2000-2010) Year 2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 Total 3465468 3329762 3284525 3271207 3258775 Occupied 1293800 1188900 1201000 1159900 Employed 616647 571061 600776 575161 Unemployed 150656 93142 65518 120303 111116 Unemployment rate 10,4 7,3 5,2 9,4 8,5 Total 671514 646320 643762 640871 639157 Occupied 284400 252700 256000 241600 Employed 166760 137331 146835 136440 Unemployed 21532 13845 13131 25229 19721 Unemployment rate 7 5,2 4,9 9,5 7,6 Total 331843 317652 313626 312879 311898 Occupied 113300 101600 101300 96800 Employed 47276 44095 47498 43985 Unemployed 15304 9992 5463 9861 9630 Unemployment rate 11,9 9 5,1 9,2 6,5 Total 551414 537090 530849 530354 529781 Occupied 208000 199100 198500 193100 Employed 86471 84773 84077 79849 Unemployed 25098 15832 11715 17979 17927 Unemployment rate 10,8 7,4 5,6 8,5 8,5 Total 294000 286208 282554 281204 280125 Occupied 102000 88200 88000 86500 Employed 34359 33194 34199 33413 Unemployed 8846 5198 4181 6681 7861 Unemployment rate 8 5,6 4,5 7,2 8,4 Total 304327 292666 288725 287780 286980 Occupied 102500 96400 100100 97400 Employed 40056 42412 47748 47783 Unemployed 15421 13262 5204 12256 10480 Unemployment rate 13,1 12,1 4,9 11,2 9,9 Total 855539 827512 817632 815657 812844 Occupied 291100 291500 302300 291400 Employed 175806 173130 182610 180022 Unemployed 45491 19509 12122 28321 26873 Unemployment rate 13,5 6,3 3,9 8,9 8,6 Total 456831 422314 407377 402462 397990 Occupied 192500 159400 154800 153100 Employed 65919 56126 57809 53669 Unemployed 18964 15504 13702 19976 18624 Unemployment rate 9 8,9 8,1 11,5 11

In 2010 unemployment rate was 8.5% at regional level. The evolution of the unemployed in South Muntenia Development Region illustrates a downward trend until 2008 when, with the triggering of the general economic crisis situation, the number of unemployed persons increased sharply, reaching a total of 120.303 in 2009 and 111.116 in 2010. In 2000 there were 150.656 unemployed and an unemployment rate of 10.4%. If in the years 2000-2001 these data regarding unemployment rate mainly reflected the large reorganizations and business closures, mainly in industry due to the privatization process and the new market economy requirements. Since 2009 the effects of the economic crisis in the region are felt throughout the country. Quantitative and qualitative changes in the housing fund, the buildings and the housing itself, in the last 10 years in Romania, highlight a series of mutations at the municipality, city and parish level, through data and statistical information for each year. Important structural changes have occurred; the total number of buildings has significantly increased over the years as arising from the situation recorded in 2000, by the Population and Housing Census of 2002 and in the subsequent years. Year 2000 2002 2005 2007 2008 2009 Total Region Area Argeş Area Călăraşi Area Dâmboviţa Area Giurgiu Area 3465468 3374916 3329762 3300801 3284525 3271207 1232417 1259643 1269987 1278071 1283639 1290050 41351800 45779800 46613800 47339800 47845000 48401200 671514 652950 646320 644236 643762 640871 252416 256148 259093 261466 263320 265299 8094600 9003900 9224900 9423200 9573200 9721200 331843 320387 317652 315187 313626 312879 112552 115254 115951 116172 116645 117244 3787400 3982700 4023200 4045900 4078800 4112300 551414 541431 537090 533330 530849 530354 190103 196791 199134 201067 202183 203401 6344200 7274200 7474700 7655400 7774400 7904000 294000 291784 286208 283408 282554 281204 108545 110299 110567 110931 111261 111685 3913500 4114200 4153300 4192500 4228700 4274200 Revista Română de Statistică nr. 10 / 2011

Ialomiţa Prahova Teleorman Area Area Area 304327 294757 292666 290563 288725 287780 103504 106793 107692 108541 109019 109706 3479000 3745200 3799100 3851800 3885500 3933200 855539 835745 827512 821013 817632 815657 297687 308358 310747 312793 313859 315130 10439600 11992900 12225400 12426900 12536500 12672400 456831 437862 422314 413064 407377 402462 167610 166000 166803 167101 167250 167585 5293500 5666700 5713000 5744300 5762000 5784000 The downward trend of number did not influence the situation regarding the construction of buildings. At regional level, in 2000, there was a 0.36% share of housing / inhabitant by an average space assigned of 11.93 square meters. In 2009 there were 0.39 share of housing / inhabitant and 14.79 square meters, space assigned to each inhabitant. The counties of Prahova, Arges and Giurgiu had 15 square meters / inhabitant. Prahova County demonstrates a specific situation having great tourist potential, having built holiday homes, hostels, hotels etc. To be noted that in the European Union there were 495 houses to 1000 inhabitants compared to the South Muntenia Development Region where there were 394 houses to 1000 inhabitants. Teleorman and Arges counties held 416, respectively 413 houses to 1000 inhabitants and Calarasi County held 374 houses to 1000 inhabitants. The EU average for the habitable area is 34 square meters/person and the average for South Muntenia Development Region is 14.79 square meters/person, stating that from this point of view, the region is far from the European average. In Bulgaria there was a value of 18.4 square meters in 2009 and Hungary exceeded the European average (34.7square meters). *** Population and housing Census of October 2011, which is performed throughout Romania, will provide new data and statistical information on and housing fund in various counties and development regions of Romania, useful for knowing the stage at a certain time and the development opportunities.