Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Pottawatomie Lake #1, Pottawatomie County, Kansas

Similar documents
Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Alma City Lake, Wabaunsee County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Banner Creek Reservoir, Jackson County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Centralia City Lake, Nemaha County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Atchison County Lake, Atchison County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Fall River Reservoir, Greenwood County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Elk City Reservoir, Montgomery County, Kansas

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Kanopolis Reservoir, Ellsworth County, Kansas

Bathymetric Survey of John Redmond Reservoir, Coffey County, Kansas

GRAVITY SURVEY TEELS MARSH PROSPECT

Using UNAVCO Real-Time CORS Data, a No-Cost Positioning Resource

Methods for Assessing Sedimentation in Reservoirs

MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc.

BUILDING AN ACCURATE GIS

Hydroacoustic survey and bathymetric map creation for Brant Lake, New York

GEOIDS FAQ. November

HORIZONTAL PROJECTION PARAMETERS: DANE COUNTY COORDINATES

Bathymetric Survey of Select Dissolved Oxygen Impaired Reservoirs

Control Surveys and Coordinate Systems

Bathymetric Survey of Select Dissolved Oxygen Impaired Reservoirs

This week s topics. Week 6. FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications. Week 6

GEODESY LESSON PLAN All Shook Up

Lecture 9: Reference Maps & Aerial Photography

Town of Chino Valley. Survey Control Network Report. mgfneerhg mc N. Willow Creek Road Prescott AZ

12/26/2012. Geographic Information Systems * * * * GIS (... yrezaei

The National Spatial Reference System of the Future

DATA SOURCES AND INPUT IN GIS. By Prof. A. Balasubramanian Centre for Advanced Studies in Earth Science, University of Mysore, Mysore

By Richard L. Kiesling. Open-File Report 2016-XXX

Watershed Modeling Orange County Hydrology Using GIS Data

Delineation of Watersheds

LAKE SURVEY REPORT. Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 07/31/2017. Lake Identification. Lake Location. Legal Descriptions

Mobile Mapping Tips and Tricks

GROUND WATER/SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS 1-3 AWRA SUMMER SPECIALTP CONFERENCE USING GIs TO MAP THE DEPTH TO SEDIMENT IN A POND

GPS and Mean Sea Level in ESRI ArcPad

NATRF 2022 AND LDP OCTOBER 11, 2017

SOURCE: NAVD88 (Computed using GEOID12B)

WindNinja Tutorial 3: Point Initialization

Trail Flow: Analysis of Drainage Patterns Affecting a Mountain Bike Trail

Shape of the Earth. Data Output by the Receiver

Geospatial Data Standards Considerations for the delivery of 2D and 3D spatial data February 2019

WindNinja Tutorial 3: Point Initialization

Lab 1: Importing Data, Rectification, Datums, Projections, and Coordinate Systems

Fusion of Geodesy and GIS at NOAA s National Geodetic Survey

Solving the "Grid to Ground Problem" with Custom Coordinate Systems CV327-6 About the Speaker:

Display data in a map-like format so that geographic patterns and interrelationships are visible

Export Basemap Imagery from GIS to CAD

ch02.pdf chap2.pdf chap02.pdf

Lab 1: Importing Data, Rectification, Datums, Projections, and Output (Mapping)

Mapping Utilities with Mobile GIS Applications

Abstract. Introduction

Outline. Chapter 1. A history of products. What is ArcGIS? What is GIS? Some GIS applications Introducing the ArcGIS products How does GIS work?

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois

Hydrographic Surveys for Six Water Bodies in Eastern Nebraska,

SonTek HydroSurveyor M9 now powered by HYPACK! CASE STUDY: USGS HYDROSURVEYOR SURVEY OF FENA VALLEY RESERVOIR, GUAM

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

IMPERIAL COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Map My Property User Guide

Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

GIS APPLICATIONS IN SOIL SURVEY UPDATES

NGS and the Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)

VT State Plane. Daniel J. Martin National Geodetic Survey VT Geodetic Advisor. VSLS Conference Rutland VT April 11, 2008

Georeferencing. Place names Postal addresses Postal codes Coordinate systems (lat/long, UTM, etc.)

KEYSTONE PROPERTY GRAVITY GIS DATABASE. Residual Gravity Looking Down to Northwest

Evaluation of a new hydroacoustic substrate classification system for oyster reef mapping in Galveston Bay, Texas

Los Padres Capacity Fall This page deliberately left blank.

Using the Stock Hydrology Tools in ArcGIS

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

IDENTIFYING THE TYPE OF COORDINATE SYSTEM FOR DATA USING ARCMAP

Spatial Data Collection using GPS: BEST PRACTICES

GPS- vs. DEM-Derived Elevation Estimates from a Hardwood Dominated Forest Watershed

Basic Geodetics What Every GIS User Should Know

COURSE SCHEDULE, GRADING, and READINGS

Title of Paper: Computational grid generation modeling transport of pathogens in Lake Michigan

GISC3325 Spring 2011 Final Exam

Projections & GIS Data Collection: An Overview

ArcGIS Pro: Essential Workflows STUDENT EDITION

Prosurv LLC Presents

Working with Map Projections

Identifying coordinate systems for data using ArcMap

Session Objectives. Learn how to: Bring georeferenced aerial imagery into Civil 3D. Connect to and import GIS data using various tools and techniques.

MAR-E1004 Basics of GIS: Georeferencing Jaakko Madetoja Slides adopted from Paula Ahonen-Rainio

Mapping Your Land and Introduction to Web Soil Survey. Elizabeth Cook GIS Specialist USDA-NRCS (retired)

Geospatial Technologies for the Agricultural Sciences

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF RETENTION PONDS

Chapter 3: Configuring Geodetics & Units

What Do You See? FOR 274: Forest Measurements and Inventory. Area Determination: Frequency and Cover

Geographic Information Systems. Introduction to Data and Data Sources

NGS Data Sheets for Rifle HARN Points

Meeting the ODOT Survey & Mapping Specifications

Introduction. Project Summary In 2014 multiple local Otsego county agencies, Otsego County Soil and Water

ADDITIONAL PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE UMORE PARK SAND AND GRAVEL MINING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA

Version 1.1 GIS Syllabus

Positioning the Pacific: NOAA s Geospatial Activities. Juliana Blackwell, Director NOAA s National Geodetic Survey March 6, 2012

Butte County Fire Department

Geography 281 Map Making with GIS Project Eight: Comparing Map Projections

Task 1: Start ArcMap and add the county boundary data from your downloaded dataset to the data frame.

TOWARDS ROBUST LOCALIZATION OF RTK-GPS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS 23

4 Survey Datums. 4.1 Horizontal Datum Policy SURVEY DATUMS SEPTEMBER 2006

The Looming Threat of Rising Sea Levels to the Florida Keys

Downloading GPS Waypoints

Data Creation and Editing

Transcription:

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Pottawatomie Lake #1, Pottawatomie County, Kansas Kansas Biological Survey Applied Science and Technology for Reservoir Assessment (ASTRA) Program Report 2010-10 (October 2010)

This work was funded by the Kansas Water Office through the State Water Plan Fund in support of the Reservoir Sustainability Initiative.

SUMMARY On June 17, 2010, the Kansas Biological Survey (KBS) performed a bathymetric survey of Pottawatomie Lake #1 in Pottawatomie County, Kansas. The survey was carried out using acoustic echosounding apparatus linked to a global positioning system. The bathymetric survey was georeferenced to both horizontal and vertical reference datums. Sediment samples were collected from three sites within the reservoir: One sample was taken near the dam; a second at mid-lake; and a third in the upper end. Sampling was performed on the same day as the bathymetric survey, following completion of the survey. Sediment samples were analyzed for particle size distributions. Summary Data: Bathymetric Survey: Date of survey: June 17, 2010 Reservoir Statistics: Elevation on survey date Area on survey date: Volume on survey date: Maximum depth: 1385.13 ft 18.3 acres 186.5 acre-feet 17.6 ft Elevation Benchmark (if applicable) UTM location of elevation benchmark: 722873.5, 4372354.7 UTM Zone: 14N UTM datum: NAD83 Elevation of benchmark, from GPS: 1387.17 ft. Vertical datum, all data: NAVD88 Sediment Survey: Date of sediment survey: June 17, 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY...i TABLE OF CONTENTS...ii LIST OF FIGURES...iii LIST OF TABLES...iv LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION... 1 BATHYMETRIC SURVEYING PROCEDURE Pre-survey preparation:... 3 Survey procedures:... 3 Establishment of lake level on survey date:... 4 Location of lake elevation benchmark... 5 NGS OPUS solution report... 6 Post-processing... 8 BATHYMETRIC SURVEY RESULTS Area-Volume-Elevation Tables... 11 SEDIMENT SAMPLING... 14 Procedures... 14 Results... 14 ii

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Pottawatomie Lake # 1.... 1 Figure 2. Location of Pottawatomie # 1 in Pottawatomie County, Kansas... 2 Figure 3. a. View of concrete pad benchmark site.... 5 b. Close-up view of lake elevation benchmark site... 5 Figure 4. Bathymetric survey transects... 7 Figure 5. Reservoir depth map... 10 Figure 6. Cumulative area-elevation curve.... 13 Figure 7. Cumulative volume-elevation curve.... 13 Figure 8. Location of sediment sites in Pottawatomie Lake # 1... 15 Figure 9. Sediment particle size analysis... 16 Figure 10. Particle size distribution of sediment samples... 17 iii

LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments... 11 Table 2. Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments... 12 Table 3 Sediment sampling site data... 14 iv

LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION Figure 1. Pottawatomie Lake #1, Pottawatomie County, Kansas. Pottawatomie Lake No. 1 is located five miles north of Westmoreland or two miles south of Blaine on Kansas Highway 99. The land that Pottawatomie Lake #1 was built on was purchased in April 1932 by the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission. The dam and the lake were a cooperative project built by the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission, Works Progress Administration, and the Kansas Highway Commission. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks is responsible for the management of Pottawatomie Lake #1. 1

2

Reservoir Bathymetric (Depth) Surveying Procedures KBS operates a Biosonics DT-X echosounding system (www.biosonicsinc.com) with a 200 khz split-beam transducer and a 38-kHz single-beam transducer. Latitudelongitude information is provided by a global positioning system (GPS) that interfaces with the Biosonics system. ESRI s ArcGIS is used for on-lake navigation and positioning, with GPS data feeds provided by the Biosonics unit through a serial cable. Power is provided to the echosounding unit, command/navigation computer, and auxiliary monitor by means of a inverter and battery backup device that in turn draw power from the 12-volt boat battery. Pre-survey preparation: Geospatial reference data: Prior to conducting the survey, geospatial data of the target lake is acquired, including georeferenced National Agricultural Imagery Project (NAIP) photography. The lake boundary is digitized as a polygon shapefile from the FSA NAIP georeferenced aerial photography obtained online from the Data Access and Service Center (DASC). Prior to the lake survey, a series of transect lines are created as a shapefile in ArcGIS for guiding the boat during the survey. Survey procedures: Calibration (Temperature and ball check): After boat launch and initialization of the Biosonics system and command computer, system parameters are set in the Biosonics Visual Acquisition software. The temperature of the lake at 1-2 meters is taken with a research-grade metric electronic thermometer. This temperature, in degrees Celsius, is input to the Biosonics Visual Acquisition software to calculate the speed of sound in water at the given temperature at the given depth. Start range, end range, ping duration, and ping interval are also set at this time. A ball check is performed using a tungsten-carbide sphere supplied by Biosonics for this purpose. The ball is lowered to a known distance (1.0 meter) below the transducer faces. The position of the ball in the water column (distance from the transducer face to the ball) is clearly visible on the echogram. The echogram distance is compared to the known distance to assure that parameters are properly set and the system is operating correctly. On-lake survey procedures: Using the GPS Extension of ArcGIS, the GPS data feed from the GPS receiver via the Biosonics echosounder, and the pre-planned transect pattern, the location of the boat on the lake in real-time is shown on the command/navigation computer screen. The transect pattern is maintained except when modified by obstructions in the lake (e.g., partially submerged trees) or shallow water and mudflats. Data are automatically logged in new files every half-hour (approximately 9000-ping files) by the Biosonics system. 3

Establishment Of Lake Level On Survey Dates: State and Local Reservoirs: Most state and local lakes in Kansas do not have water surface elevation gauges. Therefore, a local benchmark at the edge of a lake is established, typically a concrete pad or wall adjacent to the water. The location of the benchmark is photographed and a description noted. On the day of the survey, the vertical distance between the water surface and the surface of the benchmark is measured. In cases where the benchmark must be established a distance away from the lake, a surveygrade laser level is used to establish the vertical distance between benchmark and water surface. A TopCon HiPerLite+ survey-grade static global positioning system is used to establish the height of the benchmark. The unit is set at a fixed distance above the benchmark, and the vertical distance between the benchmark and the Antenna Reference Point recorded. The unit is allowed to record data points for a minimum of two hours at a rate of one point every 10 seconds. Following GPS data acquisition, the data are downloaded at the office from the GPS unit, converted from TopCon proprietary format to RINEX format, and uploaded to the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) On-line Positioning User Service (OPUS). Raw data are processed by OPUS with respect to three NGS CORS (Continuously Operating Reference Stations) locations and results returned to the user. The elevation of the benchmark is provided in meters as the orthometric height (NAVD88, computed using GEOID03). The vertical difference between the lake surface on the survey day is subtracted from the OPUS-computer orthometric height to produce the lake elevation value, in meters. This lake elevation value is entered as an attribute of the lake perimeter polygon shapefile in postprocessing. The ASTRA elevation benchmark for Pottawatomie Lake #1 is the southeast corner of a concrete pad for the floating dock immediately adjacent to the boat ramp on the northeast side of the lake (Figure 3a, Figure 3b). The water surface elevation of Pottawatomie Lake #1 of June 17, 2010 was 1385.13 feet AMSL. 4

Location of Lake Elevation Benchmark: Pottawatomie Lake #1: UTM (Zone 14) Easting (X) [meters] 722873.51, Northing (Y) [meters] 4372354.72 Figure 3a. View of concrete pad benchmark site. Figure 3b. Close-up view of lake elevation benchmark site. 5

FILE: log1001s.09o 000025822 - Pottawatomie #1 1008 NOTE: Antenna offsets supplied by the user were zero. Coordinates 1008 returned will be for the antenna reference point (ARP). 1008 NGS OPUS SOLUTION REPORT ======================== All computed coordinate accuracies are listed as peak-to-peak values. For additional information: http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/opus/about.html#accuracy USER: mjakub@ku.edu DATE: December 03, 2009 RINEX FILE: log1279s.09o TIME: 20:49:12 UTC SOFTWARE: page5 0909.08 master12.pl 081023 START: 2009/10/06 18:43:00 EPHEMERIS: igs15522.eph [precise] STOP: 2009/10/06 21:05:30 NAV FILE: brdc2790.09n OBS USED: 5080 / 5199 : 98% ANT NAME: TPSHIPER_PLUS NONE # FIXED AMB: 36 / 37 : 97% ARP HEIGHT: 0.0 OVERALL RMS: 0.012(m) REF FRAME: NAD_83(CORS96)(EPOCH:2002.0000) ITRF00 (EPOCH:2009.7639) X: -550368.554(m) 0.007(m) -550369.289(m) 0.007(m) Y: -4899676.683(m) 0.004(m) -4899675.329(m) 0.004(m) Z: 4033148.743(m) 0.011(m) 4033148.623(m) 0.011(m) LAT: 39 28 18.97244 0.008(m) 39 28 18.99548 0.008(m) E LON: 263 35 27.49939 0.007(m) 263 35 27.46251 0.007(m) W LON: 96 24 32.50061 0.007(m) 96 24 32.53749 0.007(m) EL HGT: 393.060(m) 0.009(m) 392.009(m) 0.009(m) ORTHO HGT: 422.810(m) 0.058(m) [NAVD88 (Computed using GEOID09)] UTM COORDINATES STATE PLANE COORDINATES UTM (Zone 14) SPC (1501 KS N) Northing (Y) [meters] 4372354.720 127601.956 Easting (X) [meters] 722873.509 536888.029 Convergence [degrees] 1.64775878 1.00663127 Point Scale 1.00021162 0.99996428 Combined Factor 1.00014994 0.99990262 US NATIONAL GRID DESIGNATOR: 14SQJ2287372354(NAD 83) BASE STATIONS USED PID DESIGNATION LATITUDE LONGITUDE DISTANCE(m) DI3428 KSU1 KSU1_KSUN_KS2006 CORS ARP N390602.677 W0963634.093 44694.1 DJ3673 KST6 TOPEKA 6 CORS ARP N390239.667 W0960220.831 57211.2 DJ3671 KST5 TOPEKA 5 CORS ARP N390240.554 W0960220.776 57189.3 NEAREST NGS PUBLISHED CONTROL POINT KF0112 R 119 N392944. W0962412. 2674.4 This position and the above vector components were computed without any knowledge by the National Geodetic Survey regarding the equipment or field operating procedures used. 6

0 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Miles Figure 4. Bathymetric survey lines for Pottawatomie Lake #1 Ü 7

Post-processing (Visual Bottom Typer) The Biosonics DT-X system produces data files in a proprietary DT4 file format containing acoustic and GPS data. To extract the bottom position from the acoustic data, each DT4 file is processed through the Biosonics Visual Bottom Typer (VBT) software. The processing algorithm is described as follows: The BioSonics, Inc. bottom tracker is an end_up" algorithm, in that it begins searching for the bottom echo portion of a ping from the last sample toward the first sample. The bottom tracker tracks the bottom echo by isolating the region(s) where the data exceeds a peak threshold for N consecutive samples, then drops below a surface threshold for M samples. Once a bottom echo has been identified, a bottom sampling window is used to find the next echo. The bottom echo is first isolated by user_defined threshold values that indicate (1) the lowest energy to include in the bottom echo (bottom detection threshold) and (2) the lowest energy to start looking for a bottom peak (peak threshold). The bottom detection threshold allows the user to filter out noise caused by a low data acquisition threshold. The peak threshold prevents the algorithm from identifying the small energy echoes (due to fish, sediment or plant life) as a bottom echo. (Biosonics Visual Bottom Typer User s Manual, Version 1.10, p. 70). Data is output as a comma-delimited (*.csv) text file. A set number of qualifying pings are averaged to produce a single report (for example, the output for ping 31 {when pings per report is 20} is the average of all values for pings 12-31). Standard analysis procedure for all 2008 and later data is to use the average of 7 pings to produce one output value. All raw *.csv files are merged into one master *.csv file using the shareware program File Append and Split Tool (FAST) by Boxer Software (Ver. 1.0, 2006). Post-processing (Excel) The master *.csv file created by the FAST utility is imported into Microsoft Excel. Excess header lines are deleted (each input CSV file has its own header), and the header file is edited to change the column headers #Ping to Ping and E1 to E11, characters that are not ingestable by ArcGIS. Entries with depth values of zero (0) are deleted, as are any entries with depth values less than the start range of the data acquisition parameter (typically 0.49 meters or less) (indicating areas where the water was too shallow to record a depth reading). In Excel, depth adjustments are made. A new field Adj_Depth is created. The value for AdjDepth is calculated as AdjDepth = Depth + (Transducer Face Depth), where the Transducer Face Depth represents the depth of the transducer face below water level in meters (Typically, this value is 0.5 meters). Four values are computed in Excel: DepthM, DepthFt, ElevM and ElevFt, where: 8

DepthM = Adj_Depth DepthFt = Adj_Depth * 3.28084 These water depths are RELATIVE water depths that can vary from day-to-day based on the elevation of the water surface. In order to normalize all depth measurements to an absolute reference, water depths must be subtracted from an established value for the elevation of the water surface at the time of the bathymetric survey. Determination of water surface elevation has been described in an earlier section on establishment of lake levels. To set depths relative to lake elevation, another field is added to the attribute table of the point shapefile, ElevM. The value for this attribute is then computed as Depth_ElevM = (Elevation of the Water Surface in meters above sea level) - Adj_Depth. Elevation of the water surface in feet above sea level is also computed by converting ElevM to elevation in feet (ElevM * 3.28084). Particularly for multi-day surveys, ADJ_DEPTH, Depth_M, and Depth_Ft should NOT be used for further analysis or interpolation. If water depth is desired, it should be produced by subtracting Elev_M or Elev_Ft from the reference elevation used for interpolation purposes (for federal reservoirs, the elevation of the water surface on the day that the aerial photography from which the lake perimeter polygon was digitized). Post-processing (ArcGIS): Ingest to ArcGIS is accomplished by using the Tools Add XY Data option. The projection information is specified at this time (WGS84). Point files are displayed as Event files, and are then exported as a shapefile (filename convention: ALLPOINTS_WGS84.shp). The pointfile is then reprojected to the UTM coordinate system of the appropriate zone (14 or 15) (filename convention ALLPOINTS_UTM.shp). Raster interpolation of the point data is performed using the same input data and the Topo to Raster option within the 3D Extension of ArcGIS. The elevation of the reservoir on the date of aerial photography used to create the perimeter/shoreline shapefile was used as the water surface elevation in all interpolations from point data to raster data. Contour line files are derived from the raster interpolation files using the ArcGIS command under 3D Analyst Raster Surface Contour. Area-elevation-volume tables are derived using an ArcGIS extension custom written for and available from the ASTRA Program. Summarized, the extension calculates the area and volume of the reservoir at 1/10-foot elevation increments from the raster data for a series of water surfaces beginning at the lowest elevation recorded and progressing upward in 1/10-foot elevation increments to the reference water surface. Cumulative volume is also computed in acre-feet. 9

Ü Depth in Feet 0.00-1 1.01-3 3.01-5 5.01-7 7.01-9 9.01-11 11.01-13 13.01-15 15.01-17 17.01-19 2 ft Contours 0 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Miles Figure 5. Water depth based on June 17, 2010, bathymetric surveys for Pottawatomie Lake #1. Depths are based on a pool elevation of 1385.13 ft. 10

Table 1 Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1367 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1368 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 1369 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.7 4.0 4.2 1370 4.5 4.7 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.3 1371 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.7 1372 7.8 7.9 8.1 8.2 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.8 8.9 9.0 1373 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.9 1374 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.6 10.7 1375 10.8 10.8 10.9 11.0 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.3 11.4 1376 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.6 11.7 11.7 11.8 11.8 11.9 11.9 1377 12.0 12.0 12.1 12.1 12.2 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.4 12.5 1378 12.5 12.6 12.6 12.7 12.7 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.9 12.9 1379 13.0 13.1 13.1 13.2 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.4 13.4 13.5 1380 13.5 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.8 13.9 14.0 14.1 14.1 1381 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.8 14.9 15.0 1382 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 16.0 1383 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 1384 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.6 17.7 17.8 18.0 1385 18.1 18.3 11

Table 2 Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1367 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1368 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1369 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.8 1370 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.6 9.2 1371 9.8 10.5 11.2 11.8 12.5 13.2 14.0 14.7 15.4 16.2 1372 17.0 17.7 18.6 19.4 20.2 21.0 21.9 22.8 23.6 24.5 1373 25.4 26.4 27.3 28.2 29.2 30.1 31.1 32.0 33.0 34.0 1374 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.1 39.1 40.1 41.2 42.2 43.3 44.3 1375 45.4 46.5 47.6 48.7 49.8 50.9 52.0 53.1 54.3 55.4 1376 56.5 57.7 58.8 60.0 61.2 62.3 63.5 64.7 65.9 67.1 1377 68.3 69.5 70.7 71.9 73.1 74.3 75.6 76.8 78.0 79.3 1378 80.5 81.8 83.0 84.3 85.6 86.9 88.1 89.4 90.7 92.0 1379 93.3 94.6 95.9 97.2 98.5 99.9 101.2 102.5 103.9 105.2 1380 106.6 107.9 109.3 110.6 112.0 113.4 114.8 116.2 117.6 119.0 1381 120.4 121.8 123.3 124.7 126.2 127.6 129.1 130.6 132.1 133.5 1382 135.1 136.6 138.1 139.6 141.2 142.7 144.3 145.9 147.5 149.1 1383 150.7 152.3 153.9 155.5 157.2 158.8 160.5 162.2 163.8 165.5 1384 167.2 168.9 170.6 172.4 174.1 175.8 177.6 179.4 181.1 182.9 1385 184.7 186.5 12

20 18 16 Cumulative Area (acres) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 Elevation (feet) Figure 6. Cumulative area-elevation curve 200 180 160 Cumulative Volume (acre-feet) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 Elevation (feet) Figure 7. Cumulative volume-elevation curve 13

SEDIMENT SAMPLING PROCEDURES Sediment samples were collected from three sites within the reservoir using a Wildco drop-corer (Wildlife Supply Company, Buffalo, NY). One sample is taken near the dam; a second at mid-lake; and a third in the upper end/transitional area. Sampling was performed on the same day as the bathymetric survey, following completion of the survey. As the drop-corer samples only the upper sediment, the entire sample in each case was collected and sealed in a sampling container. The samples were then shipped to the Kansas State University Soil Testing Laboratory (Manhattan, KS), for texture analysis. No bulk density sampling or analysis was performed for Lake Shawnee. SEDIMENT SAMPLING RESULTS: Sampling sites were distributed across the length of the reservoir (Figure 8). Silt percentages were highest at the two inflow ends (POTT-1, 60% and POTT-3, 56%), and lowest towards the dam (POTT-2, 38%) (Table 3; Figure 9; Figure 10). Table 3 Pottawatomie Lake #1 Sediment Sampling Site Data CODE UTMX UTMY %Sand % Silt % Clay POTT-1 722756.7 4372041.0 0 60 40 POTT-2 722950.6 4372092.1 0 38 62 POTT-3 722849.1 4372300.7 2 56 42 Coordinates are Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), NAD83, Zone 14 North 14

!. POTT-3!. POTT-2!. POTT-1 0 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Miles Figure 8. Location of sediment samples in Pottawatomie Lake #1 Ü 15

Pottawatomie #1 Lake 2010 Sediment Particle Size Analysis 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% CLAY SILT SAND 30% 20% 10% 0% POTT-1 POTT-2 POTT-3 Sample Site Figure 9. Sediment particle size analysis. 16

Ü POTT-3 POTT-2 POTT-1 Particle Size Distribution 0 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Miles Sand Silt Clay Figure 10. Particle size distribution of sediment samples in Pottawatomie Lake #1 17