Previous Lecture. Orbital maneuvers: general framework. Single-impulse maneuver: compatibility conditions

Similar documents
Previous Lecture. Approximate solutions for the motion about an oblate planet: The Brouwer model. The Cid- Lahulla model 2 / 39

Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Patch Conics. Basic Approach

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

Introduction to Satellite Orbits

5.12 The Aerodynamic Assist Trajectories of Vehicles Propelled by Solar Radiation Pressure References...

Astromechanics. 6. Changing Orbits

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

Orbit Characteristics

The Astrodynamics and Mechanics of Orbital Spaceflight

Satellite Engineering

Chapter 6 More complicated orbits and spacecraft trajectories

ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Prox Ops, Lambert

LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

L eaving Earth and arriving at another planet or asteroid requires

Celestial Mechanics Lecture 10

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design

ASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.

In the previous lecture, we discussed the basics of circular orbits. Mastering even circular orbits

Celestial Mechanics and Satellite Orbits

Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

10 Orbit and Constellation Design Selecting the Right Orbit

Orbital Maneuvers and Space Rendezvous

Optimal Control based Time Optimal Low Thrust Orbit Raising

Interplanetary Mission Analysis

A Comparison of Low Cost Transfer Orbits from GEO to LLO for a Lunar CubeSat Mission

Interplanetary Mission Opportunities

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

The B-Plane Interplanetary Mission Design

Powered Space Flight

History. Geocentric model (Ptolemy) Heliocentric model (Aristarchus of Samos)

11.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

CHANGING INCLINATION OF EARTH SATELLITES USING THE GRAVITY OF THE MOON

Lecture 15 - Orbit Problems

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Overview of Astronautics and Space Missions

Satellite Communications

Low-Thrust Trajectories to the Moon

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Space Probe and Relative Motion of Orbiting Bodies

BravoSat: Optimizing the Delta-V Capability of a CubeSat Mission. with Novel Plasma Propulsion Technology ISSC 2013

Chapter 8. Orbits. 8.1 Conics

Relative Spiral Trajectories for Low-Thrust Formation Flying

Patched Conic Interplanetary Trajectory Design Tool

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND

List of Tables. Table 3.1 Determination efficiency for circular orbits - Sample problem 1 41

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary

Chapter 2: Orbits and Launching Methods

Parallel Algorithm for Track Initiation for Optical Space Surveillance

Problem Set #2 (Orbit and Propulsion Subsystems)

Optimal Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Lagrange Multipliers

Spaceflight Dynamics

ANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS

Use conserved quantities to reduce number of variables and the equation of motion (EOM)

Orbit Transfer Optimization for Multiple Asteroid Flybys

Study of the Fuel Consumption for Station-Keeping Maneuvers for GEO satellites based on the Integral of the Perturbing Forces over Time

Session 6: Analytical Approximations for Low Thrust Maneuvers

A New Guidance Method for a DeltaV and Re-entry Constrained Orbit Transfer Problem

Celestial mechanics in an interplanetary flight

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

Newton s Legacy. 1- accelerate to break free of Earth. Rocket Science: How to send a spacecraft to Mars

MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design

Chapter 14 Satellite Motion

Orbital Mechanics! Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University! Robert Stengel

Course Overview/Orbital Mechanics

Escape Trajectories from the L 2 Point of the Earth-Moon System

SUN INFLUENCE ON TWO-IMPULSIVE EARTH-TO-MOON TRANSFERS. Sandro da Silva Fernandes. Cleverson Maranhão Porto Marinho

Orbital Transfer Trajectory Optimization. James K Whiting

Study of LEO to GEO transfers via the L1 Sun-Earth or Earth-Moon libration points

Fundamentals of Satellite technology

Lecture 8. Kepler's IInd: Angular Momentum

AN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT

Central force motion/kepler problem. 1 Reducing 2-body motion to effective 1-body, that too with 2 d.o.f and 1st order differential equations

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control

Targeting Mars. 19th June University of Ljubljana. Faculty of Mathematic and Physics. Seminar: 4. year-university program

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

Lecture Outline. Chapter 13 Gravity Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 13-1

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control

Numerical Techniques for Computing Orbits

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Aerospace Engineering DELTA-V FEASIBILITY OF PIGGYBACK LUNAR TRANSFERS

L03: Kepler problem & Hamiltonian dynamics

Chapter 8. Precise Lunar Gravity Assist Trajectories. to Geo-stationary Orbits

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

A Simple Semi-Analytic Model for Optimum Specific Impulse Interplanetary Low Thrust Trajectories

ROCK-AROUND ORBITS. A Thesis SCOTT KENNETH BOURGEOIS

Research Article Generalized Guidance Scheme for Low-Thrust Orbit Transfer

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix J. Appendix J: Trajectory Design and Orbit Determination Lead Author: Karen Richon

Transcription:

2 / 48 Previous Lecture Orbital maneuvers: general framework Single-impulse maneuver: compatibility conditions closed form expression for the impulsive velocity vector magnitude interpretation coplanar examples

3 / 48 Previous Lecture Two-impulse maneuvers: The Hohmann Transfer Three-impulse maneuvers: the Bi-Elliptic transfer Comparisons

4 / 48 Previous Lecture: Single-Impulse Maneuver Impulsive velocity expression The impulsive velocity to change a Keplerian orbit (h 0, E 0 ) to another Keplerian orbit (h 1, E 1 ), at a possible maneuver point (r 0, v 0 ) : v = h 1 r 0 r 2 0 ( ± 2E 1 + 2µ ) 1/2 h2 1 r0 r 0 r0 2 v 0 (1) r 0 The maneuver should be performed where the two orbits intersect The compatibility condition: 2E 1 + 2µ r 0 h2 1 r 2 0 0 (2)

5 / 48 Phasing Maneuvers Usefullness Constellation (deployment or replacement of a failed satellite) GEO First phase of a rendezvous procedure

Phasing Maneuvers 6 / 48

Phasing Maneuvers 7 / 48

Phasing Maneuvers 8 / 48

9 / 48 Phasing Maneuvers Input data: a, e, f

10 / 48 Phasing Maneuvers Output data: v

Phasing Maneuvers f given; obtain E from: cos E = e + cos f 1 e ; sin E = 2 sin f ; (3) 1 + e cos f 1 + e cos f Obtain t from Kepler s equation: t = 1 n ( E e sin E) = a3/2 µ ( E e sin E) (4) Obtain the period of the phasing orbit: T phas = T t = a3/2 µ (2π E + e sin E) (5) 11 / 48

12 / 48 Phasing Maneuvers Obtain the semimajor axis of the phasing orbit: ( ) µt 2 1/3 ( ) phas E e sin E 2/3 a phas = 4π 2 = a 1 (6) 2π The eccentricity of the phasing orbit: e phas = 1 a (1 e) a phas = 1 ( 1 1 e E e sin E 2π The specific angular momentum of the phasing orbit: ( ) h phas = µa phas 1 e 2 phas The impulsive velocity: ) 2/3 ( ) (7) (8) v = h h phas a (1 e) (9)

13 / 48 Phasing Maneuvers Phasing maneuver was made at perigee (Remember Oberth effect). Ignore Oberth s effect: optimal maneuver is at apogee. Apogee maneuver: restricted by the perigee of the phasing orbit (greater the difference between target/interceptor lower the perigee of the phasing orbit). Phasing at apogee: in the tutorial.

14 / 48 Non-Coplanar Impulsive Maneuver The impulsive velocity magnitude: v 2 = v 2 rad + v2 h (10) v rad : change in radial velocity v h : change in angular momentum Change of orbital plane: v h > 0 (reciprocal is not true) Changes in the orbital plane are extremely costly: v 2 h = h2 0 + h2 1 2h 0 h 1 r 2 0 (11)

15 / 48 Non-Coplanar Impulsive Maneuver Given two non-coplanar orbits (h 0, E 0 ), (h 1, E 1 ), what remains to be determined is the possible maneuver point r 0 Given the known properties of the Keplerian orbits, look for r 0 in the following form: r 0 = ±r 0 h 0 h 1 h 0 h 1 (12) In the tutorial: example of RAAN change example de inclination change

16 / 48 Example: Space Shuttle and Hubble Space Shuttle Capabilities Space Shuttle: capable of a plane change in orbit of only 3, a maneuver which would exhaust its entire fuel capacity. Can Hubble be moved to the ISS? Hubble: 28.5 inclination, 569 km altitude ISS: 51.6 inclination, 370 km altitude Too costly! Instead, NASA has chosen to have another shuttle ready to lift off to retrieve the astronauts if needed.

17 / 48 Example: Inclination Change Inclination change (circular orbits assumption): should occur only when crossing the equatorial plane (Why?) The impulsive velocity maneuver is: µ i v h = 2 sin R 2 = 2v 0 sin i 2 Numerical example: 1 degree inclination change at 600 km altitude R = R e + H = 6378 10 3 + 600 10 3 = 6978 10 3 m µ = 3.986004418 10 14 m 3 /s 2 Impulsive velocity magnitude: v = 131.9 m/s (13)

18 / 48 Lambert s Problem Lambert s Problem Given two different times t 1 and t 2, and given two position vectors r 1 and r 2, determine the Keplerian arc characterized by the law of motion r = r (t) such that r (t 1 ) = r 1 and r (t 2 ) = r 2 Johann Heinrich Lambert, 1728 1777 Swiss mathematician

19 / 48 Lambert s Problem Lambert s Conjecture The orbital transfer time depends only upon the semimajor axis, the sum of the distances of the initial and final points of the arc from the center of the force, and the length of the chord joining these points. Mathematical Formulation If t 1,2 are the two moments of time, then Lambert theorem states that: (t 2 t 1 ) = 1 µ F (a, r 1 + r 2, r 2 r 1 )

20 / 48 Lambert s Problem: Why? Design of interplanetary missions: initial approximation of travel from Earth to another planet (Mars, for example): t 1 = time of launch from Earth; t 2 = time of arrival; r 1 = position of Earth at the launch; r 2 = position of Mars at the time of arrival elliptic heliocentric orbit Orbit determination: by knowing two succesive positions (GPS measured) r 1 = r 1 (t 1 ) and r 2 = r 2 (t 1 ) Rendez-vous missions

Solving Lambert s Problem 21 / 48

Solving Lambert s Problem 22 / 48

23 / 48 Solving Lambert s Problem Two-point boundary value problem: Unperturbed: Find the vector valued function r = r (t) such that: r + µ r 3 r = 0; r (t 1) = r 1 ; r (t 2 ) = r 2 (14) The Lambert problem in the Keplerian case has a closed-form analytic solution Perturbations might be included as well: Find the vector valued function r = r (t) such that: r + µ r 3 r = f (r, ṙ, t) ; r (t 1) = r 1 ; r (t 2 ) = r 2 (15) General method: numerical

24 / 48 Solving Lambert s Problem: Keplerian Lagrange was first to supply the analytic proof of Lambert s theorem for elliptic orbits just one year before Lambert died. Euler (1743) developed the special case of Lambert s theorem for the parabola, but he did not extend it to the ellipse and hyperbola. Gauss, in his Theoria Motus, presented almost the same solution. The problem is solvable analytically for any conic: elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic

25 / 48 Solving Lambert s Problem: Keplerian Further Reading: Chapter 6 Two-Body Orbital Boundary-Value Problem Section 6.6: Lambert s Theorem

26 / 48 Solving Lambert s Problem: General Input data: r 1,2 ; t = t 2 t 1 Output data: ṙ (t 1 ) = v (t 1 ) ; Shooting method: Start with an initial guess v 1 = ṙ (t 1 ) 1 Integrate the initial value problem: r + µ r 3 r = f (r, ṙ, t) ; r (t 1) = r 1 ; ṙ (t 1 ) = v 1 (16) obtain the solution r (t) and evaluate r (t 2 ) ; 2 Evaluate the targeting error δr (t 2 ) = r (t 2 ) r 2 3 Update the initial velocity estimate by using the local-linearization: ṙ (t 1 ) }{{} new = ṙ (t 1 ) }{{} old [ ] r (t2 ) 1 δr (t 2 ) (17) ṙ (t 1 ) 4 Return to step (1) until δr (t 2 ) has become sufficiently small.

27 / 48 Solving Lambert s Problem: General Further Reading: Chapter 13 Transfer Orbits

28 / 48 Maneuvers: Delta v budget A satellite / spacecraft has a limited amount of fuel a Delta v budget It is the sum of the velocity changes required throughout the space mission life. It is a good starting point for early design decisions. As important as power and mass budgets. In some cases, it may become a principal design driver and impose complex trajectories to deep space probes. Maneuvers: minimize the total expense of Delta v. Maneuvers: several parameters involved restrictions.

Delta v: Examples 29 / 48

30 / 48 Maneuvers: Rocket Engines Maneuvers are performed using firings of onboard rocket motors. Chemical rocket engines: Assumption of impulsive thrust in this lecture: because the burn times are small compared with the time intervals between burns, the thrust can be idealized as having infinitely small duration (no thrust included in the equation of motion). Electric propulsion: Continuous and low thrust.

Rocket Engines: Monopropellant 31 / 48

Rocket Engines: Bipropellant 32 / 48

Rocket Engines: Solid 33 / 48

Rocket Engines: Low-Thrust 34 / 48

Specific Impulse, I sp 35 / 48

Rocket Engines: I sp 36 / 48

Further Reading on the Web Site 37 / 48

Appendix: The Lagrangian Coefficients 38 / 48

39 / 48 Triple Vector Product Given three vectors a, b, c in V 3, their triple vector product is defined as: (a, b, c) = a (b c) Geometrical interpretation: numerically equal to the volume of the parallelepiped with the edges a, b, c.

40 / 48 Reciprocal (dual) basis Given three non-coplanar vectors e 1, e 2, e 3 V 3, they form a basis B. The reciprocal basis B = {e1, e 2, e 3 } is defined as: e k e p = δ kp = { 1, k = p 0, k = p, k, p {1, 2, 3} δ kp are called the Kronecker symbols. The vectors of the reciprocal basis B are determined as: e 1 = e 2 e 3 (e 1, e 2, e 3 ) ; e 2 = e 3 e 1 (e 1, e 2, e 3 ) ; e 3 = e 1 e 2 (e 1, e 2, e 3 )

41 / 48 The Lagrangian Coefficients The functions F, G, F t, G t are the components of the position and velocity respectively in the non-orthogonal basis {r 0, v 0, h 0 = r 0 v 0 } : { r (t) = Fr0 + Gv 0 v (t) = F t r 0 + G t v 0 (18) The Lagrangian coefficients are obtained by dot-multiplying each equation by r0, v 0 : { F = r (t) r 0 G = r (t) v0 F t = v (t) r0 G t = v (t) v0 (19) The expressions of r0, v 0 are computed as in the previous slide: r0 = v 0 h 0 h 2 ; v0 = h 0 r 0 0 h 2 0 (20)

42 / 48 The Lagrangian Coefficients The Lagrangian coefficients may formally be written as: [ ] [ ] F G r (t) T [ = r F t G t v (t) T 0 v0 ] (21) where: r (t) = r 0 = 1 r 0 [ [ a (cos E e) b sin E cos E0 a b sin E 0 ] ] ; v (t) = na [ a sin E r b cos E ; v 0 = 1 h [ ] b sin E 0 a (e cos E 0 ) ] (22)

The Lagrangian Coefficients The following expressions are obtained: F = a [cos (E E 0 ) e cos E 0 ] ; r 0 G = 1 n [sin (E E 0) e (sin E sin E 0 )] ; F t = na2 rr 0 sin (E E 0 ) ; (23) G t = b r [cos (E E 0) e cos E] ; where: r = a (cos E e) ; r 0 = a (cos E 0 e) (24) cos E 0, sin E 0 are given in Lecture 4A. The Analytic Methods. 43 / 48

44 / 48 The Lagrangian Coefficients The vectors r, v, r0, v 0 may also be expressed as: [ ] cos f r (t) = r ; v (t) = h [ sin f sin f p e + cos f r 0 = 1 p [ e + cos f0 sin f 0 ] ; v0 = r [ 0 sin f0 h cos f 0 ] ] (25)

The Lagrangian Coefficients The Lagrangian coefficients F, G, F t, G t are now expressed equivalently as: F = r p [cos ( f f 0) + e cos f ] ; G = rr 0 h sin( f f 0) F t = h p 2 [sin ( f f 0) + e (sin f sin f 0 )] ; (26) where: G t = r 0 p [cos ( f f 0) + e cos f 0 ] ; r = p 1 + e cos f ; r 0 = and f 0 is deduced from the initial conditions (r 0, v 0 ). p 1 + e cos f 0 (27) 45 / 48

46 / 48 This Lecture Phasing impulsive maneuvers. Non-coplanar impulsive maneuvers. Lambert s Problem. Delta v budget and propulsion systems. The Lagrangian coefficients.

47 / 48 Next Lecture Spacecraft Formation Flying