arxiv:quant-ph/9501001v3 6 Jan 1995 Critique of proposed imit to space time measurement, based on Wigner s cocks and mirrors L. Diósi and B. Lukács KFKI Research Institute for Partice and Nucear Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB 49, Hungary buetin board ref.: quant-ph/9501001 January 3, 1995 Abstract Based on a reation between inertia time intervas and the Riemannian curvature, we show that space time uncertainty derived by Ng and van Dam impies absurd uncertainties of the Riemannian curvature. E-mai: diosi@rmki.kfki.hu, ukacs@rmki.kfki.hu 0
Recenty, Ng and van Dam [1, 2] presented a proof of the intrinsic quantum uncertainty δ of any geodetic ength being proportiona to the one third power of the ength itsef: δ = 2/3 P 1/3 (1) where P is the Panck enghts. In addition, they caim that an intrinsic uncertainty of space time metric has been derived in Refs. [1, 2]. Now, the probem deserves a discussion since, a few years ago, the present authors [3] pointed out that the formua (1) woud certainy overestimate the uncertainty of the space time. This formua woud be the uncertainty of a distincted word ine whose ength is measured at the price of tota ignorance about the enghts of any other neighbouring word ines. In a sense, the uncertainties of a neighbouring word ines within about a tube of diameter wi charge the uncertainty of the distincted one. Cacuate, for instance, the mass m of the cock when adjusted according to the Eqs. (3) and (4) of Ng and van Dam: ( ) 1/3 m = m P (2) P where m P is the Panck-mass. It is at east worrying that the optimum mesurement of a enght 1cm requires a cock of mass m 10 6 g and, simiariy, the optimum measurement of a timeike distance t 1s needs a cock with m 10 16 g (i.e. 10 10 metric tons!). Of course, the arge mass of the cock needed to reach the imit of accuracy is not a proof against the proposed fuctuation formua. But we can show that eq. (1) eads to drastic effects in the space time continuum, strongy affecting macroscopy. That Eq. (1) seriuosy overestimates the uncertainty of space time can now be shown by an independent eementary proof. Let us start with the formua (6) of Ng and van Dam: δt = t 2/3 P t1/3 (3) whereδt is the proposeduncertainty of thetime taong an arbitrariy chosen time-ike geodesic and t P is the Panck-time. This uncertainty impies a certain uncertainty of the physica space time geometry. One expects that the corresponding fuctuations of the oca Riemann curvature are fairy sma. 1
Fortunatey, there exists a simpe reation between a subte tripet of time intervas on one hand and the average Riemannian curvature on the other. We recapituate this reation according to Wigner [4]. Assume space time is fat on average. Take a cock and in distance /2 a mirror; for simpicity s sake et them be at rest reative to each other. Let us emit a ight signa from the cock to the mirror, and et the cock measure the tota fight time t 1 as the signa has got back to it. Repeat the same experiment immediatey after, for the fight time t 2, and simiariy for a third one t 3. Then, the average curvature C in the space time region swept by the ight puses is C = 1 11c t 1 2t 2 +t 3 t 2. (4) 2 Let us obtain the quantum uncertainty δc of the above curvature. Of course, each period t i (i = 1,2,3) has the same average vaue /c. Their quantum uncertainties δt i are aso equa. According to Ng and van Dam, any timeike geodesic ength possesses the utimate uncertainty (3) so do ours, too: ( ) 2/3 ( ) P 1/3 δt i =. (5) c c If P the periods t i are much arger than their fuctuations (5) and, consequenty, we can approximate the uncertainty of the curvature (4) by an expession inear in δt i : δc = c 11 2δ(t 1 2t 2 +t 3 ). (6) To cacuate the squared average vaue of δc, one rewrites the above equation in the foowing equivaent form: [δc] 2 = ( ) c 2( 11 2 3[δt 1 ] 2 +9[δt 2 ] 2 +3[δt 3 ] 2 3[δ(t 1 +t 2 )] 2 3[δ(t 2 +t 3 )] 2 +[δ(t 1 +t 2 +t 3 )] 2). (7) Each term on the RHS is then evauated by means of the Eq. (3). After extracting a root, on obtains δc = 15 6 2 2/3 +3 2/3 11 1 ( P ) 2/3. (8) 2
The averaged Riemann-tensor components are reated to the averaged curvatures (4) as, e.g., R 0101 = 2C 2 provided both cock and mirror ay aong the first coordinate axis [4]. It seems pausibe to assume that δc of (8) yieds the order of magnitude not ony for the Riemann-tensor components but for the components of Ricci-tensor as we as for the Riemann-scaar R uness specia statistica correation is shown or at east assumed between the various components of the Riemann-tensor. So, Eq. (8) yieds the foowing estimation for the Riemann-scaar R averaged in a 4-voume 4 /c: δr 1 2 ( P ) 4/3. (9) Basicay, one woud expect with Ng and van Dam that these fuctuations are sma. There is at east one good criterion to test their smaness. According to the Einstein theory of genera reativity, nonzero scaar curvature R assumes nonzero energy density. If we assume that the energy-momentum tensor is dominated by the energy density ρ then the fuctuation (9) of the Riemann scaar woud impy δρ (c 2 /G)R ( h/c) 2/3 P 10/3, (10) where δρ denotes the universa fuctuation of the energy density ρ averaged in a 4-voume 4 /c. This fuctuation woud be extremy high at sma ength scaes. At 10 5 cm, for instance, the uncertainty δρ woud be in the order of water density; that is triviay excuded by experience. According to decent cosmoogica estimations, e.g. from gaaxy counts, the average mass density of our Universe shoud not exceed 10 29 gcm 3. Then, the Eq. (10) yieds 10 4 cm which in turn means that the proposa of Ng and Dam for the uncertainty of geodesic ength may not be appied for enghts shorter than some 100 meters otherwise one might get another Universe due to the additiona cosmoogic mass density generated by the short range metric fuctuations. According to a these arguments, we think that Ng and van Dam in [1, 2] have in fact derived an unconditiona uncertainty for a singe geodesic. However, the uncertainty of a singe geodesic ength shoud not be used to cacuate the intrinsic uncertainty of the space time metric: it woud need the simutaneous uncertainties of a geodesics or at east of a subte subset of a. We pointed out that to ignore the correations of those uncertainties woud ead too high uncertainties of the space time curvature. Finay, it is worth to mention that a detaied account of the present authors aternative to repace Eq. (1) can be found in Ref. [3]. 3
This work was supported by the grant OTKA No. 1822/1991. References [1] Y.J. Ng and H. van Dam, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 35 (1994). [2] Y.J. Ng and H. van Dam, Princeton report IASSNS-HEP-94/41. [3] L. Diósi and B. Lukács, Phys.Lett. 142A, 331 (1989). [4] E.P. Wigner, Rev.Mod.Phys. 29 (1957, Juy). 4