Lecture 7 Constitutive Behavior of Asphalt Concrete

Similar documents
Mechanical Models for Asphalt Behavior and Performance

Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures for Development of

Creep Compliance Analysis Technique for the Flattened Indirect Tension Test of Asphalt Concrete

USE OF BBR TEST DATA TO ENHANCE THE ACCURACY OF G* -BASED WITCZAK MODEL PREDICTIONS

2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

Flexible Pavement Design

VISCOELASTIC FE MODELING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS AND ITS APPLICATION TO U.S. 30 PERPETUAL PAVEMENT. A dissertation presented to.

Abvanced Lab Course. Dynamical-Mechanical Analysis (DMA) of Polymers

Implementation of M-E PDG in Kansas

2002 Design Guide Preparing for Implementation

Analysis of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) Linear Viscoelastic and Bimodular Properties Using Uniaxial Compression and Indirect Tension (IDT) Tests

Prediction of Complex Shear Modulus and Fracture Properties of Asphalt Binders with Oxidative Aging

Dynamic Resilient Modulus and the Fatigue Properties of Superpave HMA Mixes used in the Base Layer of Kansas Flexible Pavements

Mechanical Models for Asphalt Behavior and Performance

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SPONSORSHIP

Meso Mechanical Analysis of AC Mixture Response

Mechanical Properties of Polymers. Scope. MSE 383, Unit 3-1. Joshua U. Otaigbe Iowa State University Materials Science & Engineering Dept.

MATERIAL MODELS FOR CRUMB RUBBER AND TDA. California State University, Chico

Testing Elastomers and Plastics for Marc Material Models

HOT MIX ASPHALT CYCLIC TORQUE TESTS FOR VISCOELASTIC BULK SHEAR BEHAVIOUR

Analysis of Non-Linear Dynamic Behaviours in Asphalt Concrete Pavements Under Temperature Variations

Interconversion of Dynamic Modulus to Creep Compliance and Relaxation Modulus: Numerical Modeling and Laboratory Validation

Impact of Healing. Self healing in bituminous materials. Lab. Field. log N ,845

Characterizing Nonlinear Viscoelastic Response of Asphaltic Materials

Linear viscoelastic behavior

NCAT Test Track Prediction

Determining the asphalt mastercurve from free-free resonant testing on cylindrical samples

Rheological Properties and Fatigue Resistance of Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen

Estimating Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

Difference Between Fixed and Floating Reference Points AASHTO T-321

Phenomenological models for binder rutting and fatigue. University of Wisconsin Research Team

The 2S2P1D: An Excellent Linear Viscoelastic Model

Standard Title Page - Report on State Project Report No. Report Date No. Pages Type Report: Final VTRC 05- Project No.: 70984

Superpave Implementation Phase II: Comparison of Performance-Related Test Results

DISPLACEMENT RATE AND TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON ASPHALT CONCRETE CRACKING POTENTIAL ASM TAMIM U. KHAN THESIS

DYNAMIC AND TRANSIENT TESTING OF ASPHALT BINDER AND PAVING MIX

Performance-Based Mix Design

Evaluation of Different Procedures and Models for the Construction of Dynamic Modulus Master Curves of Asphalt Mixtures

Role of Binders in Pavement Performance

Discrete Element Modelling of Idealised Asphalt Mixture

Asphalt Mix Performance Testing on Field Project on MTO Hwy 10

TECHNICAL PAPER INVESTIGATION INTO THE VALIDATION OF THE SHELL FATIGUE TRANSFER FUNCTION

Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model

Nonlinear oscillatory shear tests applied to bitumen: analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS)

20. Rheology & Linear Elasticity

Estimating Fatigue Resistance Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

Updating Bituminous Stabilized Materials Guidelines: Mix Design Report, Phase II

Stress and strain dependence of bituminous materials viscoelastic properties

Lecture 2: Stresses in Pavements

Hardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16

LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR VISCOELASTIC BEHAVIOUR OF BINDERS AND ASPHALTS

Development of specifications for the superpave simple performance tests

The Effect of Aging on Binder Properties of Porous Asphalt Concrete

State of Wisconsin/Department of Transportation RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING: JUNE 30, 2008

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 5. Engineering Properties of Rocks (West, Ch. 6)

William G. Buttlar Glaucio H. Paulino Harry H. Hilton Phillip B. Blankenship Hervé DiBenedetto. All colleagues and friends

Finite Element Modeling of Hot-Mix Asphalt Performance in the Laboratory

FULL-DEPTH HMA PAVEMENT DESIGN

Lecture 5. Rheology. Earth Structure (2 nd Edition), 2004 W.W. Norton & Co, New York Slide show by Ben van der Pluijm

Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 22(1) : (2010)

Creep. Creep behavior of viscoelastic polymeric materials

Mechanistic Pavement Design

TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE

Measurement Engineering Group, Paderborn University, Warburger Straße 100, Paderborn, Germany

CHARACTERIZATION OF VISCOELASTIC AND FRACTURE PROPERTIES OF ASPHALTIC MATERIALS IN MULTIPLE LENGTH SCALES

ME 2570 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Agricultural Science 1B Principles & Processes in Agriculture. Mike Wheatland

Stress Sweep Rutting (SSR) Test: AMPT

A Multiple Laboratory Study of Hot Mix Asphalt Performance Testing

单击此处编辑母版标题样式 Investigation into the Size effect on Four Point Bending Fatigue Tests

NCHRP. Project No. NCHRP 9-44 A. Validating an Endurance Limit for Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavements: Laboratory Experiment and Algorithm Development

Rheology of Asphalt Binders and Implications for Performance

Chapter 7. Highlights:

Linear Amplitude Sweep Test:

DYNAMIC MODULUS MASTER CURVE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SUPERPAVE HMA CONTAINING VARIOUS POLYMER TYPES

AMPT Cyclic Fatigue Test

Module-4. Mechanical Properties of Metals

RHEOLOGY & LINEAR ELASTICITY. B Importance of fluids and fractures in deformation C Linear elasticity for homogeneous isotropic materials

Unified Constitutive Model for Engineering- Pavement Materials and Computer Applications. University of Illinois 12 February 2009

Mechanical characterization of visco termo elastic properties of a polymer interlayer by dynamic tests

COMPLEX MODULUS FROM INDIRECT TENSION TESTING

Strength of Material. Shear Strain. Dr. Attaullah Shah

Module 5: Failure Criteria of Rock and Rock masses. Contents Hydrostatic compression Deviatoric compression

FACTORS AFFECTING RESILIENT MODULUS

Cookbook for Rheological Models Asphalt Binders

1.103 CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS LABORATORY (1-2-3) Dr. J.T. Germaine Spring 2004 LABORATORY ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 6

MATERIALS FOR CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS

Stress-Strain Behavior

Evaluation of the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixture incorporating reclaimed asphalt pavement

Mechanical properties 1 Elastic behaviour of materials

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility

Performance Characteristics of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Treated Ground Tire Rubber Added During the Mixing Process

Chapter 6: Mechanical Properties of Metals. Dr. Feras Fraige

Pavement Design Where are We? By Dr. Mofreh F. Saleh

VECD (Visco-ElasticContinuum Damage): State-of-the-art technique to evaluate fatigue damage in asphalt pavements

USE OF BINDER RHEOLOGY TO PREDICT THE CRACKING PERFORMANCE OF SBS-MODIFIED MIXTURE

Workshop 4PBB First Steps for the perpetual pavement design: through the analysis of the fatigue life

Deformation of Polymers. Version 2.1. Boban Tanovic, MATTER David Dunning, University of North London

Asphalt Pavement Response and Fatigue Performance Prediction Using. Warm Mix Asphalt

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. EQUATIONS AND THEOREMS

Transcription:

Lecture 7 Constitutive Behavior of Asphalt Concrete

What is a Constitutive Model? A constitutive model or constitutive equation is a relation between two physical quantities that is specific to a material or substance and approximates the response of that material to external stimuli. (Wikipedia)

Simple Case: 1-D Linear Elasticity

Uniaxial Test sectional

Viscoelastic Material Characterization Challenges Asphaltic materials are Visco-Elasto-Plastic heterogeneous composites. Asphalt binders behave as: viscous fluids at high temperatures elastic solids at very low temperatures viscoelastic at intermediate temperatures Aggregate skeleton behaves as assemblage of elastic solids with cohesive/frictional contacts.

Challenges Asphaltic Material 20 year old pavement

Viscoelastic Material Characterization Challenges Standard strength of materials approach is often inadequate. Need to account for: Effects of time and load history Effects of temperatures Effect of aging Effects of heterogeneity Effects of damage and failure (fatigue, fracture, etc.)

Strain Decomposition

Linear Viscoelasticity

Superposition: Linear Elasticity First let s examine what happens to a Linear Elastic material when we add (or subtract) new loads (or deformation).

Superposition: Linear Elasticity For a linear time dependent or viscoelastic solid, we cannot just scale and add the strains.

Superposition: Linear Elasticity For a linear time dependent or viscoelastic solid, we cannot just scale and add the strains.

Superposition: Linear Viscoelasticity What about an arbitrary loading history? Boltzmann s Convolution Integral 14

Common Test Methods Choice of Unit Response Functions Creep Compliance D(t) Constant stress Relaxation Modulus E(t) Constant strain Complex Modulus E* Sinusoidal load with constant stress or strain amplitude

Inter-conversion of Unit Response Functions 16

Rate Dependent Stiffness

Temperature Dependent Stiffness

Viscoelastic Response: Cyclic Loading Complex Modulus Dynamic Modulus Phase Angle 19

Viscoelastic Response: Cyclic Loading 20

Viscoelastic Response: Creep

Creep Test 22

Viscoelastic Response: Relaxation

Relaxation Test

Mechanical Models

Basic Material Responses

Viscoelastic Behavior Viscoelastic Response= Immediate Elastic Response + Time Dependent Viscous Response

Mechanical Models Maxwell Model Kelvin Model

Maxwell Model Maxwell model is a combination of spring and dashpot in series. Under constant stress, the total strain is the sum of the strains in both spring and dashpot.

Maxwell Model If a stress is applied instantaneously to the model, the spring will experience an instantaneous strain of 0 /E 0. If the strain is kept constant, the stress will gradually relax and after a long period of time will be zero. When t = 0, then = 0 ; when t = infinity, then = 0; and when t = T, then = 0.368 0. Relaxation time is the time required for stress to relax to 36.8% of the original value. Maxwell is good model for relaxation behavior. It is more convenient to specify relaxation times than viscosity, because of its physical meaning.

Maxwell Model

Kelvin Model Combination of spring and dashpot in parallel. Both spring and dashpot have the same strain but the total stress is the sum of the two stresses.

Kelvin Model Kelvin

Kelvin Model

Burger Model

Generalized Model

Creep Compliance A common method to characterize viscoelastic materials is the measurement of the compliance at various times (D(t)): ε(t) is the strain under constant stress For the generalized model:

Creep Compliance If a creep compliance curve is given, it is possible to determine the constants of the generalized model by two ways: By minimizing the error using a Dirichlet Series. By the collocation of creep compliances.

Creep Compliance

Creep Compliance Collocation of Creep Compliances. A creep test is performed and x compliances are measured at x different times (e.g. x =10 {0.001, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 13} according to FHWA) x number of retardations time are assumed (fixed parameters) and the values of G 1 to G x are determined following the equation in the next slide. Then, a linear system of x by x equations can be solved.

Creep Compliance

Colocation of Creep Compliances

Colocation of Creep Compliances

Colocation for Viscoelastic Solutions Similar procedure can be used to calculate the approximate viscoelastic response (vertical displacement) R of a viscoelastic material: If the responses at n number of time durations are obtained from elastic solutions, the coefficients c 1 through c n can be obtained (some values of Ti can be selected from the beginning to obtain a matrix expression)

Time-Temperature Superposition Viscoelastic properties: function of time and temperature. Most asphalt binders: thermorheologically simple: Time-Temperature Superposition applies. The effect of time on material properties can be replaced by the effect of temperature, and vice versa.

Time-Temperature Dependency of Asphalt 46

Time-Temperature Superposition Time-temperature superposition principle: E(t 1,T 1 )=E(t 2, T 2 ) where: t 1 < t 2, and T 1 >T 2 If E(t) is needed at low temperature (T 2 ) and long loading time (t 2 ), is possible to increase the temperature (T 1 ) and decrease the loading time (t 1 ) to obtain such a value.

Time-Temperature Superposition The time-temperature superposition principle is used on experimental data to obtain: Master curve: describing the viscoelastic properties at a reference temperature and over a range of time or frequency, and Shift function-temperature curve: describing the ratio between the actual time at which the test was conducted and the reference time to which the data is shifted vs. the temperature at the actual time.

Time-Temperature Superposition To describe master curve: assume that relaxation modulus, E(t), is described by a simple power function as: E( t) E 1 t m Taking log from the both sides of the equation: log E( t) log E m log t 1 If relaxation modulus is conducted at different temperatures: Log E T 1 T 2 T 3 T 4 Log t

Time-Temperature Superposition The curves can be horizontally shifted to a reference temperature, let s say T 2 Original Data Master curve at T 2 Log E T 1 T 2 T 3 T 4 Log E Log t Note: t r =reduced time, not the actual (but the shifted) time Log t r

Mathematically we can express the shift of modulus data as: E( T, t) E( T2, t / at ) The effect of changing temperature (T 2 instead of T (reference) is the same as applying a multiplicative factor to the time scale

Time-Temperature Superposition The shifting function gives the relationship between the actual time, t, and the reduced time, t r, for each temperature: a T a T t t r 1 T 1 T 2 T 3 T 4 T

Solution (simplified methodology) 1. Assume shift factors for each temperature (a T (T i )). 2. Compute the reduced frequency, f R, for each temperature (f R =a T (T i ) x f). 3. Check if the plot of G* vs. f R follows the expected tendency of the curve at the reference temperature. 4. If not, repeat follows 2 to 3 as necessary. 5. Fitted the shift factors to a William-Landel-Ferry (WLF) equation: log a T C C 1 2 T T T R T R

Time-Temperature (t-t) Superposition

Log Complex modulus, G* (Pa) Log Frequency (rad/sec) Example Original data Complex shear modulus (G*) versus frequency and reduced frequency obtained from DSR tests 1.E+09 1.E+08 1.E+07 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 1.E+03 1.E+02 1.E+01 1.E+00 Reference temperature (Tr) shifting direction shifting direction T1 = 76C, DSR T2 = 64C, DSR T3 = 52C, DSR T4 = 37C, DSR8 T5 = 25C, DSR8 T6 = 13C, DSR8 1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 1.0E+01 1.0E+02 1.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.0E+05

Log Complex modulus, G* (Pa) Solution Master curve for G* at 25ºC reference temperature 1.E+09 1.E+08 1.E+07 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 1.E+03 1.E+02 1.E+01 Master curve for the complex shear modulus (G*) at a 25C reference temperature 76C (25mm) 64C (25mm) 52C (25mm) 37C (8mm) 25C(8mm) 13C (8mm) 1.E+00 1.0E-05 1.0E-03 1.0E-01 1.0E+01 1.0E+03 1.0E+05 1.0E+07 Log frequency (rad/sec)

Dynamic Modulus-AASHTO TP62 AASTHO provisional standard TP62: measure E* of HMAs at different temperatures and loading frequencies (uniaxial or triaxial, tension or compression). If a compression test is used: specimen also creeps. A decomposition of the responses is needed. However, the creep response is typically ignored and E* is computed as the ratio between the amplitude of the stress function to the amplitude of the strain function.

Dynamic Modulus Decomposition of loading and strain response into dynamic and creep: Total Applied Stress Dynamic Stress Creep Stress Total Response Dynamic Response Creep Response

Dynamic Modulus Peak stress level: chosen to maintain total measured strain per cycle between 50-150 microstrain (linear viscoelastic behavior), 3 LVDTs used to measure response, test conducted from lowest to highest temperature and from highest to lowest frequency of loading.

Dynamic Modulus Data from Dynamic Modulus Test: used to compute the master curve of HMAs. One recommended procedure to mathematically represent the master curve: sigmoidal function, log E * 1 e log t r where t R : reduced time at reference temperature, : minimum value of E*, + : maximum value of E*, : shape parameters (gradation and volumetrics)

Dynamic Modulus Master Curves

AASHTO TP62-03 Axial compression sinusoidal load on 100 mm diameter, 150 mm tall cylinders. Axial deformations measured by LVDTs mounted at different locations using 4 inch gauge length. Loading frequencies and temperatures: 10, 4, 21, 37, and 54 C (14, 40, 70, 100, and 130 F) Loading frequencies of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5, 10, and 25 Hz 62

Dynamic Modulus ( E* ), Saw-Cut Samples

G* -Based Witczak s Predictive Equation 64

Viscosity-Based Witczak s Predictive Equation 65

Typical Moduli Values E Material (psi) (MPa) Asphalt Concrete (32 F) 3 million 21,000 Asphalt Concrete (70 F) 500,000 3,500 Asphalt Concrete (120 F) 20,000 150 Crushed Stone 20,000-100,000 150-750 Sandy Soils 5,000-30,000 35-210 Silty Soils 5,000-20,000 35-150 Clayey Soils 5,000-15,000 35-100 Cement-Treated Base 1-3 million 7,000-21,000 Stabilized Soils 50,000-2 million 345-14,000 PCC 3-8 million 21,000-56,000

Typical Poisson s Ratio Values Material Poisson s Ratio PCC 0.15-0.20 Asphalt Concrete (32 F) 0.20 Asphalt Concrete (70 F) 0.35 Asphalt Concrete (120 F) 0.40 Crushed Stone 0.40 Fine-Grained Soils 0.45 Sandy Soils 0.35 Cement-Treated Base 0.15 Cement-Treated Soils 0.25 Lime-Stabilized Soils 0.20 Lime-Fly Ash Mixtures 0.15