In collaboration w/ G. Giudice, D. Kim, JCP, S. Shin arxiv: Jong-Chul Park. 2 nd IBS-KIAS Joint High1 January 08 (2018)

Similar documents
Doojin Kim University of Wisconsin, WI November 14th, 2017

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 19 Dec 2017

Jong-Chul Park. DM from aev to ZeV: IBS-MultiDark-IPPP Workshop November 24 (2016)

Dark Sectors at the Fermilab SeaQuest Experiment

Self-interacting asymmetric dark matter

Recent results from PandaX- II and status of PandaX-4T

Coherent scattering of light objects on nuclei. Maxim Pospelov Perimeter Institute/U of Victoria

GALACTIC CENTER GEV GAMMA- RAY EXCESS FROM DARK MATTER WITH GAUGED LEPTON NUMBERS. Jongkuk Kim (SKKU) Based on Physics Letters B.

Searching for at Jefferson Lab. Holly Szumila-Vance On behalf of the HPS, APEX, DarkLight, and BDX 2017 JLab User s Group Meeting 20 June 2017

Neutrinos and DM (Galactic)

DARWIN. Marc Schumann. U Freiburg PATRAS 2017 Thessaloniki, May 19,

Chern-Simons portal Dark Matter

The WIMPless Miracle and the DAMA Puzzle

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 7 Nov 2012

Surprises in (Inelastic) Dark Matter

The Four Basic Ways of Creating Dark Matter Through a Portal

A cancellation mechanism for dark matter-nucleon interaction: non-abelian case

Inelastic Dark Matter and DAMA

Lecture 14. Dark Matter. Part IV Indirect Detection Methods

Enectalí Figueroa-Feliciano

DARWIN. Marc Schumann. U Freiburg LAUNCH 17 Heidelberg, September 15,

LHC searches for dark matter.! Uli Haisch

A realistic model for DM interactions in the neutrino portal paradigm

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

CEνNS: Models. Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University

Gauged U(1) clockwork

The Sommerfeld Enhancement for Thermal Relic Dark Matter with an Excited State

Beyond Simplified Models

Searching for dark photon. Haipeng An Caltech Seminar at USTC

New dark matter direct detection signals

Dark Matter searches in ATLAS: Run 1 results and Run 2 prospects

Reminder : scenarios of light new physics

Fermionic DM Higgs Portal! An EFT approach

FERMION PORTAL DARK MATTER

Whither WIMP Dark Matter Search? Pijushpani Bhattacharjee AstroParticle Physics & Cosmology Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata

THE STATUS OF NEUTRALINO DARK MATTER

Neutrino bounds on dark matter. Alejandro Ibarra Technische Universität München

Background and sensitivity predictions for XENON1T

Search for Dark Ma-er and Large Extra Dimensions in the jets+met Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at s = 13 TeV

Fundamental Physics with GeV Gamma Rays

Pseudoscalar portals into the dark sector

The Search for Dark Matter, and Xenon1TP

First data at Belle II and Dark Sector physics

Light Dark Matter experiment

Axion and axion-like particle searches in LUX and LZ. Maria Francesca Marzioni

DARK MATTER. Martti Raidal NICPB & University of Helsinki Tvärminne summer school 1

LHC searches for momentum dependent DM interactions

Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter

Status of DM Direct Detection. Ranny Budnik Weizmann Institute of Science

The XENON1T experiment

Shedding Light on Dark Matter from Deep Underground with XENON. Kaixuan Ni (Columbia)

Feebly Interacting Massive Particles and their signatures

Search for Dark Matter with LHC proton Beam Dump

M. Lattanzi. 12 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Paris, 17 July 2009

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

Chiral Dark Sector. Keisuke Harigaya (UC Berkeley, LBNL) KH, Yasunori Nomura Raymond Co, KH, Yasunori Nomura 1610.

LATE DECAYING TWO-COMPONENT DARK MATTER (LD2DM) CAN EXPLAIN THE AMS-02 POSITRON EXCESS

Supernova Neutrino Physics with XENON1T and Beyond

Direct Detection of! sub-gev Dark Matter

Non-detection of the 3.55 kev line from M31/ Galactic center/limiting Window with Chandra

Quirks. Z. Chacko University of Maryland, College Park

Proton Decays. -- motivation, status, and future prospect -- Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory Masato Shiozawa

The Factors That Limit Time Resolution for Photon Detection in Large Cherenkov Detectors

Self-interacting asymmetric dark matter. Kallia Petraki Université Pierre et Marie Curie, LPTHE, Paris

Project Paper May 13, A Selection of Dark Matter Candidates

Collider searches for dark matter. Joachim Kopp. SLAC, October 5, Fermilab

Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Jay Wacker. APS April Meeting SLAC. A Theoretical Perspective. May 4, 2009

Lecture 12. Dark Matter. Part II What it could be and what it could do

Dark Matter searches with astrophysics

Instituto de Fisica Teórica, IFT-CSIC Madrid. Marco Taoso. Sommerfeld enhancement and Bound State formation. DM from aev to ZeV. Durham

Search for Dark Particles at Belle and Belle II

Discovery searches for light new physics with BaBar

Boosted Dark Matter in IceCube and at the Galactic Center

Searches for New Physics in quarkonium decays at BaBar/Belle

Dark Matter/Forces & Axions Session Review

Constraints on Light WIMPs from Isotropic Diffuse γ-ray Emission

Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams

Beam Dump Experiments at JLab and SLAC

Sneutrino dark matter and its LHC phenomenology

Searches for Exotics in Upsilon Decays in BABAR

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 12 Dec 2018

The Story of Wino Dark matter

Relating the Baryon Asymmetry to WIMP Miracle Dark Matter

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

Searches for low-mass Higgs and dark bosons at BaBar

TWO-PHASE DETECTORS USING THE NOBLE LIQUID XENON. Henrique Araújo Imperial College London

Searching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum

Can the DAMA annual modulation be explained by Dark Matter?

NA64. Dipanwita Banerjee ETH, Zurich On behalf of the NA64 collaboration

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

in NA64 at the CERN SPS. DSU-2018 June 2018 Annecy Search for a new X-boson and Dark Photons in NA64

in NA64 at the CERN SPS. QUARKS-2018 Mai 2018 Valdai Search for a new X-boson and Dark Photons in NA64

The 17 MeV Anomaly in Beryllium Decays and U(1) Portal to Dark Matter

Search for heavy neutrinos in kaon decays

A halo-independent lower bound on the DM capture rate in the Sun from a DD signal

Attacking Dark Forces with Intense Electron Beams at DESY

Natural explanation for 130 GeV photon line within vector boson dark matter model

The Search for Dark Matter with the XENON Experiment

Prospects for indirect dark matter detection with Fermi and IACTs

Direct Detection of Dark Matter with LUX

Transcription:

In collaboration w/ G. Giudice, D. Kim, JCP, S. Shin arxiv: 1712.07126 Jong-Chul Park 2 nd IBS-KIAS Joint Workshop @ High1 January 08 (2018)

(Mainly) focusing on Non-relativistic weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) searches - Elastic scattering χ χ N [Goodman, Witten (1985)] - Inelastic scattering (idm) χ χ E recoil ~ mv 2 ~ 1 100 kev (v/c ~ 10-3 ) Detectors designed to be No solid observation of WIMP signals LZ-TDR (2017) N [Tucker-Smith, Weiner (2001)] sensitive to this E scale A wide parameter respace already excluded

Scattering v DM non-relativistic (<< c) relativistic (~c) elastic Direct detection BDM inelastic inelastic DM (idm) Very well-studied ibdm

Scattering v DM elastic inelastic non-relativistic (<< c) Direct detection inelastic DM (idm) relativistic (~c) Boosted DM (BDM)

Z 2 /U(1) Z 2/U(1) Belanger, JCP (2011) χ 0 SM χ 0 SM

Z 2 /U(1) Z 2/U(1) Belanger, JCP (2011) Most of the relic χ 0 χ 0 SM SM Freeze-out first Y 0 Y 1 Assisted Freeze-out mechanism

Z 2 /U(1) Z 2/U(1) Belanger, JCP (2011) Most of the relic χ 0 χ 0 SM SM Freeze-out first Freeze-out later Y 0 Y 1 Assisted Freeze-out mechanism Non-relativistic relic

Z 2 /U(1) Z 2/U(1) Belanger, JCP (2011) χ 0 SM χ 0 SM χ 0 χ 0 (current universe): Relativistic!! (γ 1 =m 0 /m 1 ) (Note that relic is non-relativistic.) χ 0 χ 0 (Galactic Center) (Laboratory) [Agashe, Cui, Necib, Thaler (2014)]

Flux of boosted near the earth F χ1 σv χ 0 χ 0 m 0 2 Setting σv χ0 χ 0 ~10 26 cm 3 s 1 and assuming the NFW DM halo profile, one can obtain F χ1 ~10 6~8 cm 2 s 1 for χ 0 of weak-scale mass, m 0 ~O(10-100 GeV). Low flux No sensitivity in conventional DM direct detection experiments Large volume (neutrino) detectors from the number density of DM χ 0, n 0 =ρ 0 /m 0 motivated: Super-/Hyper-K, DUNE, DUNE SK/HK

Flux of boosted near the earth F χ1 σv χ 0 χ 0 m 0 2 Setting σv χ0 χ 0 ~10 26 cm 3 s 1 and assuming the NFW DM halo profile, one can obtain F χ1 ~10 6~8 cm 2 s 1 for χ 0 of weak-scale mass, m 0 ~O(10-100 GeV). Low flux No sensitivity in conventional DM direct detection experiments Large volume (neutrino) detectors from the number density of DM χ 0, n 0 =ρ 0 /m 0 motivated: Super-/Hyper-K, DUNE, DUNE Sources SK/HK GC: Agashe et al (2014); Necib et al (2016); Alhazmi, Kong, Mohlabeng, JCP (2016) Sun: Berger et al (2014); Kong, Mohlabeng, JCP (2014); Alhazmi, Kong, Mohlabeng, JCP (2016) Dwarf galaxies: Necib et al (2016)

SK Collaboration, arxiv:1711.05278 m B =200 MeV, m X =20 MeV, g =0.5 M A (GeV)

Scattering v DM elastic inelastic non-relativistic (<< c) Direct detection inelastic DM (idm) relativistic (~c) Boosted DM (BDM)

Scattering v DM elastic inelastic non-relativistic (<< c) Direct detection inelastic DM (idm) relativistic (~c) Boosted DM (BDM) inelastic BDM (ibdm)

D. Kim, JCP & S. Shin, PRL (2017) χ 2

D. Kim, JCP & S. Shin, PRL (2017) Inelastic scattering χ 2 Target recoil (like in typical DM direct detection exp.) + secondary visible signatures more handles, (relatively) background-free Complementary to standard DM direct searches Boosted DM sources needed: BDM scenarios, fixed target experiments, etc.

D. Kim, JCP & S. Shin, PRL (2017) Inelastic scattering χ 2 Target recoil (like in typical DM direct detection exp.) + secondary visible signatures more handles, (relatively) background-free Complementary to standard DM direct searches Boosted DM sources needed: BDM scenarios, fixed target experiments, etc. Ordinary collider DM collider Follow-ups in collaborations with experimentalists (DUNE, HK, SHiP, )

Flux of boosted F χ1 σv χ 0 χ 0 m 0 2 Reducing by 2-3 orders of magnitude Flux increased by 4-6 orders of magnitude! GeV/sub-GeV m 0 MeV-range m 1 motivated Conventional DM direct detection Exps. may have MeV-range (boosted) DM signal! Elastic scattering off nucleus in the context of quark-philic scenarios, e.g. gauged baryon number/higgs portal models non-energetic [Cherry, Frandsen, Shoemaker (2015)]

Conventional DM direct detection experiments: e-recoil (ER) events are rejected (mostly, E ~ kev sub-mev) Boosted MeV-range DM Energetic ER expected (efficient E transfer) E ~ MeV sub-gev May leave an appreciable track: 2-10 cm @ LXe (4-20 cm @LAr) for e of E~O(10-100 MeV) e-scattering cross section can be larger than p/n-scattering (depending on parameter choice) e-scattering will be excellent in search for MeV-range (boosted) DM particles!

ҧ ҧ SM Hidden L int ε 2 F μνx μν + g 11 γ μ X μ + g 12 χ 2 γ μ X μ + h. c. Based on Assisted FO set-up [Belanger, JCP (2011)] Vector portal (kinetic mixing) [Holdom (1986)] Fermionic DM γ ε X χ 2 : a heavier (unstable) dark-sector state Flavor-conserving elastic scattering Flavor-changing inelastic scattering X g 12 χ 2 [Tucker-Smith, Weiner (2001); Kim, Seo, Shin (2012)] Diagonal coupling may be highly suppressed, even vanishing. Scalar DM also possible

e : ER ordinary but energetic elastic scattering χ 2 e X e + e : ER + e + e - pair (from the decay of on-shell X) (m 2 > m 1 + m X ) χ 2 e e + e : ER + e + e - pair (from the decay of off-shell X threebody decay of χ 2 ) secondary signal may be displaced. (m 2 < m 1 + m X )

XENON1T DEAP-3600 LUX-ZEPLIN(LZ) Ongoing Future [Numbers are for fiducial volumes.] XENON1T & LZ: S1(scintillation) + S2(ionization) XENON (2017) DEAP-3600: S1 only

A sizable track is expected! Tracks of 2-10 cm @ LXe / 4-20 cm @LAr for electrons of E~O(10-100 MeV) [Material property available at NIST https://physics.nist.gov/physrefdata/star/text/estar.html]

A given vertical track Drift field

A given vertical track can be considered as an array of scattering points. free electrons released at each point: more (less) electrons at the scattering (ending) point Drift field e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e expect a series of flickers of several PMTs by an interval of ~10 ns (1 cycle of charge discharge) Expect (relatively) easy identification of a lengthy track + more precise track/e reconstruction (than the horizontal track)

A given horizontal track Drift field

A given horizontal track expect simultaneous charging of several PMTs, some of which may saturate Expect identification of a lengthy track is e e e e e e e e e e e e doable/achievable Track/E reconstruction may require likelihood Drift field analysis with unsaturated PMTs Saturated PMTs

A given positron track e + Drift field

A given positron track stops in the detector and gets annihilated with a nearby electron, creating two characteristic 511 kev photon! Drift field e + e 511 kev 511 kev Additional handle to identify positrons or positron tracks This signature is particularly useful for DEAP-3600 as PMTs cover almost the entire surface of the detector.

Tracks Pop Up inside the fiducial volume, Not from outside! 1 2 ER Ordinary elastic scattering: single-track e + ER e Three distinguishable tracks May leave an identifiable displaced secondary vertex 3 4 ER Three overlaid tracks Density pattern: e + different from that for e e + the elastic scattering Displaced vertex: maybe identifiable ER e (Relatively) prompt secondary process Three overlaid tracks Density pattern: different from that for the elastic scattering Displaced vertex: non-identifiable Multi-tracks/displaced vertex necessary only for post-discovery (e.g., elastic vs. inelastic) DEAP-3600: a displaced vertex 6.5 cm identifiable only with S1 through a likelihood fitter

Quite energetic ER & secondary signals Three-body decay of χ 2 longlived χ 2 a sizable vertex (m 2 < m 1 + m X ) Two-body decay of χ 2 no displaced vertex < resolution (m 2 > m 1 + m X )

[Required fluxes of in unit of 10-3 cm -2 sec -1 ] Multi: primary & secondary tracks / Single: 1 track with E 10 MeV within the fiducial volume Requiring 3 signal events under the zero background assumption DEAP-3600 has no sensitivity to ref3 & ref4 (no displaced vertices) in multi channel: It is challenging to identify 3 final state particles only with S1. However, it has sensitivity to identify just BDM even for ref3 & ref4 (not ibdm).

Non-trivial to find appropriate parameterizations for providing model-independent reaches due to many parameters involved in the model Number of signal events N sig is N sig = σ F A t exp N e σ: scattering cross section between (BDM) and electron (target) F: flux of incoming (boosted) A: acceptance t exp : exposure time N e : total number of target electrons Controllable!

Acceptance determined by the distance between the primary & the secondary vertices (relatively) conservative limit to require two correlated vertices in the fiducial volumes (also to be distinguished from elastic scattering) 90% C.L. with zero background Calculable given a detector l lab : different event-by-event taking l max lab for more conservative limit

Acceptance determined by the distance between the primary & the secondary vertices (relatively) conservative limit to require two correlated vertices in the fiducial volumes (also to be distinguished from elastic scattering) 90% C.L. with zero background Calculable given a detector smaller ε F for ref1 and ref2 evaluated with σv χ0 χ 0 being 5 10 26 cm 3 s 1 l lab : different event-by-event taking l max lab for more conservative limit

No (measurable) displaced vertex Acceptance 1 : relevant to signals with overlaid vertices or elastic scattering signals F~ σv χ 0 χ 0 m 0 2 set to be 5 10 26 cm 3 s 1 Experimental sensitivity can be represented by σ vs. m 0 (= E 1 ). ref3 ref4 [Note that DEAP-3600 may not tell apart inelastic scattering from elastic scattering.]

Dark X invisibly decays into DM pairs (m X > 2m 1 ) Babar Babar Caused by the position resolution of 6.5 cm @ DEAP-3600

Dark X decays into SM pairs, i.e. e + e - (m X < 2m 1 ) NA48/2 Babar NA48/2 Babar

Scattering v DM elastic inelastic non-relativistic (<< c) Direct detection inelastic DM (idm) relativistic (~c) Boosted DM (BDM) inelastic BDM (ibdm) Direct detection of lighter BDM Indirect detection of heavier DM Small flux Large volume required (e.g. SK/HK, DUNE, ) Conventional DM direct detection Exps. have sensitivities to MeV-range DM. Provide alternative avenue to probe dark photon parameter space.