Changing the Dopant Concentration. Diffusion Doping Ion Implantation

Similar documents
Ion Implantation ECE723

Ion Implantation. alternative to diffusion for the introduction of dopants essentially a physical process, rather than chemical advantages:

Ion Implant Part 1. Saroj Kumar Patra, TFE4180 Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology ( NTNU )

Make sure the exam paper has 9 pages (including cover page) + 3 pages of data for reference

VLSI Technology Dr. Nandita Dasgupta Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Make sure the exam paper has 7 pages (including cover page) + 3 pages of data for reference

Ion implantation Campbell, Chapter 5

Processing of Semiconducting Materials Prof. Pallab Banerji Department of Metallurgy and Material Science Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Quiz #1 Practice Problem Set

Lecture 5. Ion Implantation. Reading: Chapter 5

EE 212 FALL ION IMPLANTATION - Chapter 8 Basic Concepts

ION IMPLANTATION - Chapter 8 Basic Concepts

Lecture 150 Basic IC Processes (10/10/01) Page ECE Analog Integrated Circuits and Systems P.E. Allen

Section 6: Ion Implantation. Jaeger Chapter 5

EE143 Fall 2016 Microfabrication Technologies. Lecture 7: Ion Implantation Reading: Jaeger Chapter 5

Lecture 12 Ion Implantation

Lab1. Resolution and Throughput of Ion Beam Lithography.

Chapter 8 Ion Implantation

EE-612: Lecture 22: CMOS Process Steps

Section 7: Diffusion. Jaeger Chapter 4. EE143 Ali Javey

Fast Monte-Carlo Simulation of Ion Implantation. Binary Collision Approximation Implementation within ATHENA

Modelling for Formation of Source/Drain Region by Ion Implantation and Diffusion Process for MOSFET Device

Chapter 9 Ion Implantation

Accelerated ions. ion doping

Manufacturable AlGaAs/GaAs HBT Implant Isolation Process Using Doubly Charged Helium

Semiconductor Detectors

Review of Semiconductor Fundamentals

Ajay Kumar Gautam Asst. Prof. Electronics & Communication Engineering Dev Bhoomi Institute of Technology & Engineering Dehradun UNIT II

Properties of Error Function erf(z) And Complementary Error Function erfc(z)

DIFFUSION - Chapter 7

Semiconductors Reference: Chapter 4 Jaeger or Chapter 3 Ruska Recall what determines conductor, insulator and semiconductor Plot the electron energy

Dopant Diffusion. (1) Predeposition dopant gas. (2) Drive-in Turn off dopant gas. dose control. Doped Si region

A semiconductor is an almost insulating material, in which by contamination (doping) positive or negative charge carriers can be introduced.

3.155J/6.152J Microelectronic Processing Technology Fall Term, 2004

Xing Sheng, 微纳光电子材料与器件工艺原理. Doping 掺杂. Xing Sheng 盛兴. Department of Electronic Engineering Tsinghua University

Diffusion and Ion implantation Reference: Chapter 4 Jaeger or Chapter 3 Ruska N & P Dopants determine the resistivity of material Note N lower

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

September 21, 2005, Wednesday

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Fall Exam 1

Introduction to Semiconductor Physics. Prof.P. Ravindran, Department of Physics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India

Self-study problems and questions Processing and Device Technology, FFF110/FYSD13

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. College of Engineering. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Professor Ali Javey.

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) Thomas Sky

Lab 3. Ion Implantation

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

EE143 LAB. Professor N Cheung, U.C. Berkeley

MATHEMATICS OF DOPING PROFILES. C(x,t) t. = D 2 C(x,t) x 2. 4Dt dx '

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)

Chapter 8 Ion Implantation

High-Precision Evaluation of Ultra-Shallow Impurity Profiles by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

! CMOS Process Enhancements. ! Semiconductor Physics. " Band gaps. " Field Effects. ! MOS Physics. " Cut-off. " Depletion.

Dopant Diffusion Sources

Lecture 0: Introduction

Chapter 2. Design and Fabrication of VLSI Devices

Ratio of Charge to Mass for the Electron

Microscopy AND Microanalysis MICROSCOPY SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006

MOSFET: Introduction

LECTURE 5 SUMMARY OF KEY IDEAS

Gaetano L Episcopo. Scanning Electron Microscopy Focus Ion Beam and. Pulsed Plasma Deposition

ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems

Semiconductor-Detectors

ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems

nmos IC Design Report Module: EEE 112

IC Fabrication Technology

Electrons are shared in covalent bonds between atoms of Si. A bound electron has the lowest energy state.

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Make sure the exam paper has 8 pages plus an appendix page at the end.

CMOS. Technology Doping Profiles. Simulation of 0.35 Ixm/0.25 INTRODUCTION

Introduction to Photolithography

Force on a Moving Charge in a Magnetic Field: Examples and Applications

Solid State Device Fundamentals

Gold Nanoparticles Floating Gate MISFET for Non-Volatile Memory Applications

The Intrinsic Silicon

Lecture 04 Review of MOSFET

EE 143 MICROFABRICATION TECHNOLOGY FALL 2014 C. Nguyen PROBLEM SET #7. Due: Friday, Oct. 24, 2014, 8:00 a.m. in the EE 143 homework box near 140 Cory

Energetic particles and their detection in situ (particle detectors) Part II. George Gloeckler

Basic Physics of Semiconductors

DQN Positive Photoresist

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

Lab 1. Resolution and Throughput of Ion Beam Lithography

collisions of electrons. In semiconductor, in certain temperature ranges the conductivity increases rapidly by increasing temperature

Pre Lab for Ratio of Mass to. Charge of an Electron

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

! CMOS Process Enhancements. ! Semiconductor Physics. " Band gaps. " Field Effects. ! MOS Physics. " Cut-off. " Depletion.

ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems. Today MOS MOS. Capacitor. Idea

Ion Implanter Cyclotron Apparatus System

Calculation of Ion Implantation Profiles for Two-Dimensional Process Modeling

DEPOSITION OF THIN TiO 2 FILMS BY DC MAGNETRON SPUTTERING METHOD

! Previously: simple models (0 and 1 st order) " Comfortable with basic functions and circuits. ! This week and next (4 lectures)

! Previously: simple models (0 and 1 st order) " Comfortable with basic functions and circuits. ! This week and next (4 lectures)

Photon Energy Dependence of Contrast in Photoelectron Emission Microscopy of Si Devices

Quality Assurance. Purity control. Polycrystalline Ingots

Fabrication Technology, Part I

UNIT 3. By: Ajay Kumar Gautam Asst. Prof. Dev Bhoomi Institute of Technology & Engineering, Dehradun

CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits. Lecture 03: MOS Transistor

Section 12: Intro to Devices

ETCHING Chapter 10. Mask. Photoresist

EFFECT OF REACTOR GEOMETRY ON ION ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR PULSED PLASMA DOPING (P 2 LAD)*

ICPMS Doherty Lecture 1

Transcription:

Changing the Dopant Concentration Diffusion Doping Ion Implantation

Step 11 The photoresist is removed with solvent leaving a ridge of polysilicon (the transistor's gate), which rises above the silicon wells.

Step 12 Chemical doping implants phosphorous (green) deep within the silicon wells surrounded by the silicon dioxide and polysilicon layers to produce negatively doped silicon.

Diffusion vs. Implantation

Changing the Dopant Concentration Diffusion Doping Ion Implantation

Some advantages of ion implantation. Ion species can be implanted with high accuracy over many orders of magnitude of doping level. Depth profiles can be defined by control of ion energy. Dopants can be implanted in selected regions at low temperatures. Both p and n type dopants with variety of diffusion characteristics can be implanted. Damage can be removed with thermal annealing. Lateral displacement of dopants less than with thermal diffusion. Distribution can be modeled and predicted to high degree of accuracy. Implantation can take place through a thin protective surface layer (such as SiO 2 ). Implantation takes place at low temperature. Exotic doping profiles can be created.

Some disadvantages or limitations of ion implantation. Ion implantation imparts some damage to crystal structure. Maximum depth of implantation is relatively shallow (on order of 1 micron). Throughput is typically lower than for conventional diffusion. Ion implanters are complex and expensive. Ion implanters contain many potential safety hazards including high voltage, radiation, and toxic gases.

Ion basics: energy, acceleration, and dynamics. Positive ion in electric field experiences force: ZeE Where Z is number of positive charges, e is the electronic charge unit, and E is the electric field (in appropriate units.). Ion acquires an energy corresponding to (V-V o ) where V is the applied potential and V o is the reference potential. If initial velocity is zero at V o and if the ion has mass m, then mv 2 /2 = ZeV. Thus ion is accelerated in response to field. Often energy is simply given in electron volts that is the energy achieved with Z=1 and potential of 1V. Note that 1 ev is a large amount of energy relative for example to thermal energy.

Ion basics: behavior in magnetic field. Force on a moving charged particle: F = (Ze) v B where v and B are velocity and magnetic field vectors. For ion moving in a circular path, centripetal force is mv 2 /R where R is radius of path. Thus where B is perpendicular to v, mv 2 /R = ZeBv from which we may deduce that R 2m( V 0 V ) / ez B Working through the magnetic field units, this gives: R m( V 0 V ) / Z 4.55 B Where B is in kgauss, V in kilovolts, mass in amu and R is in cm. For example, boron + (11 amu mass) ions at 100KV through B=15 kilogauss moves through a radius of 10 cm.

Ion basics continued. Some notes: Isotope is important: boron consists of isotopes with both mass 10 (19%) and 11 (81%) for example and each will be deflected differently in the magnetic field. Dynamics generally depend upon ratio m/z thus where velocity selection or mass selection is involved, doubly charged ions of twice the mass will behave the same as singly charged ions of a given mass. Beam intensity becomes limited because of mutual repulsion of like-charged particles. This phenomenon also causes defocusing of particles.

Ion implantation apparatus. Ion source Ion mass selection Ion acceleration Vacuum system Ion deflection Substrate rotation Faraday cup: dose measurement Wafer loading etc.

Ion optics: control of ion beam characteristics.

Ion implantation: Characteristics. Apparatus characterized by: Current (dose per unit time). Beam energy. Net dose = current (ions/sec) time (sec) / beam area (cm 2 ). Interaction of ion beam with matter (and in particular a silicon wafer): Realm of high energy physics. Theoretical models for interaction of high energy particles with matter abound.

Interaction of ion beam with matter. Beam has high energy, small wavelength. The ion is scattered repeatedly by lattice atoms until it is ultimately stopped. Process is statistical and can be described by a Gaussian distribution. R p is projected range or average distance traveled before ion stops. Np is maximum concentration. R p is straggle and describes standard deviation of distance traveled. Note: the dispersion horizontally can be described by an additional R

Typical range parameters for ion implantation.

Theoretical models for implantation profiles. http://home3.netcarrier.com/~chan/implant/

Example calculational results: Model output: phosphorus doping of silicon.

Interaction of ion beam with matter...continued. Total dose per unit area: Q 2 N p R p Comparison of ion implant distribution to diffusion distribution:

Typical implantation profile more detail. Parameters approximate for B doping of Si at 150KeV.

Channeling phenomena in ion implantation. Wavelength of ionic particles is very small. Lattice structure has channels within structure. Si 100 Si 110 Si 110 ECE541/ME541 Microelectronic Fabrication Techniques Page 42

Channeling in ion implantation.continued. Solution is to angle ion beam slightly to normal of substrate. For silicon the angle is typically 7-10 degrees.

Typical parameters for ion implantation equipment. Medium current implanters. Beam currents from 10 amps to 1 ma. Ion energies from 20-200 KeV. Basically these are the work horse machines for the industry. High current implanters. Beam currents from to 30 ma. Ion energies from 80-200 KeV. Used for doping levels greater than 10 15 ions/cm2. Low energy (and ultra-low energy) implanters. Beam currents above 20 ma. Ion energies from 0.2-80 KeV. High energy implanters. Ion energies from 200-3,000 KeV.

Eaton implanter process chamber with beam. HE3 process chamber with beam. 30 cm wafer system.

Varian EH2 and related systems. Varian EHPi: The World's Leading Medium Current Ion Implanter EHPi-220 5-200 kev EHPi-500 5-260 kev (X+) When it comes to medium current implanters, the E-series is the undisputed world leader. Over 550 are in production around the world...all in the most reliable medium current system available for features sizes down to 0.18 micron and wafer sizes up to 200mm.

Example: Estimation of doping process conditions. Imagine that we have a substrate which is n-type (phosphorus doped for example) with impurity concentration of 3 10 16 cm -3. We wish to dope with boron to create a p-n junction at distance d 2 =2.77 microns (2.77 10-4 cm) with overall doping level given by Q 2 =1.42 10 14 cm -2. How can we accomplish that through a two-step diffusion process and how can we define the predeposition and drive-in process parameters? Let us consider a two step process. In step 1 we will deposit the appropriate amount of dopant within a short distance at the surface of the wafer (from a constant concentration) and in step 2 we will drive that fixed level of dopant to the desired junction depth.

Example.continued. First let us note that the junction will occur where the p- type dopant (boron) concentration equals the base n-type concentration. Thus we seek to provide concentration of 3 10 16 cm -3. The total dopant provided needs to correspond to Q 2 = 1.42 10 14 cm -2. Since: 2 Q 0 x C A( x, t) exp D t 4DABt AB It must be that C(2.7710 4, t 2 ) 310 16 1.4210 D2t2 14 exp (2.7710 4D t Where D 2 is the diffusion coefficient for boron (at drive in temperature T 2 ) and t 2 is the drive-in diffusion time. 2 2 4 ) 2

Example.continued. This determines the desired value of diffusion coefficient diffusion time product for the drive in process. 3 10 17 Plot of concentration vs D 2 t 2 product: Fu j 2 10 17 1 10 17 Solution is clearly near D 2 t 2 =6 10-9. 1 10 17 0 0 2 10 8 4 10 8 6 10 8 8 10 8 1 10 7 u j Numerical analysis gives D 2 t 2 =5.33 10-9 Fu j 5 10 16 0 0 2 10 9 4 10 9 6 10 9 8 10 9 u j

Example.continued. For this solution, we may map the boron profile needed after drive in. This can be achieved with any combination of D 2 t 2 = 5.33 10-9 cm 2. Cx k answer 1.5 10 18 1 10 18 5 10 17 0 0 1 10 4 2 10 4 3 10 4 1 10 21 Depth (cm) x k If we chose to carry out drive in at 1100 o C, then D 2 is about 2.96 10-13 cm 2 /sec giving t 2 =1.8 10 4 sec, or 5 hours. 1 10 20 1 10 19 Cx k answer 1 10 18 1 10 17 1 10 16 0 1 10 4 2 10 4 3 10 4 Depth (cm) x k

Example.continued. We now need only to determine the predeposition conditions. We desire to identify a source and diffusion conditions (D 1 and the corresponding temperature T 1 and diffusion time t 1 ) that will provide for Q 2 loading within a distance short compared to d 2 (2.7 microns). If we work from a source that saturates Boron at 900 o C, then the saturation concentration is 1.1 10 20 cm -3. From such a source, we may obtain the correct dopant dose: Q 2 ( t) CA( x, t) dx C A 0 0 14 20 Q A ( t1) 1.4210 1.110 D1t 1 2 From which we may deduce that D 1 t 1 = 1.31 10-12 cm 2. D AB t

Example.continued. If we take 900 o C, the the diffusion coefficient for B is about 1.45 10-15 cm 2 /sec and thus the predeposition drive-in time would be 903 sec or about 15 minutes. We can thus calculate the profiles after step 1 and after step 2 and make sure that this all makes sense. 1 10 21 1 10 20 Cx 1 10 19 k answer C1 x k U1 1 10 18 Final profile 1 10 17 1 10 16 0 1 10 4 2 10 4 3 10 4 x k

Example.continued. Slightly expanded timescale. 1 10 21 1 10 20 Final profile Cx 1 10 19 k answer C1 x k U1 1 10 18 1 10 17 1 10 16 0 2 10 5 4 10 5 6 10 5 8 10 5 x k