Hyper-Kamiokande R&D. Francesca Di Lodovico (QMUL) on behalf of the Hyper-Kamiokande working groups

Similar documents
The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Super/Hyper-Kamiokande

The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment. Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary University of London

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment

Hyper-K physics potentials and R&D

Next-Generation Water Cherenkov Detectors (1) Hyper-Kamiokande

The Hyper-Kamiokande project

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

Introduction to Super-K and Hyper-K. Roger Wendell Kyoto U. High-Energy Group Meeting

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

This is a repository copy of Astroparticle Physics in Hyper-Kamiokande.

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

The Factors That Limit Time Resolution for Photon Detection in Large Cherenkov Detectors

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Super-K Gd. M.Ikeda(ICRR) for Super-K collaboration Workshop for Neutrino Programs with facilities in Japan

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

Hyper-Kamiokande. Kenzo NAKAMURA KEK. August 1-2, 2005 Neutrino Meeting IIT-Bombay, Mumbai, India

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

Leptons and the Weak Interaction

Solar and atmospheric ν s

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

Super- Kamiokande. Super- Kamiokande (1996- ) h=41.4m. Hyper- K (201X? - ) Kamiokande ( ) M. Yokoyama Friday 14:30

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

Research and Development of Large-Aperture Hybrid Photo-Detectors for Hyper-Kamiokande. Yusuke Suda Department of Physics, University of Tokyo

What should be considered and improved for CP study.

Proton Decays. -- motivation, status, and future prospect -- Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory Masato Shiozawa

M.Nakahata. Kamioka observatory ICRR/IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo. 2016/11/8 M. Nakahata: Neutrino experiments - 30 years at Kamioka 1

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

The LENA Neutrino Observatory

Development of 50 cm Diameter Hybrid Photo-Detector for Hyper-Kamiokande. Tianmeng Lou Department of Physics, University of Tokyo

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part I

UNO: Underground Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Observatory

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

Daya Bay and joint reactor neutrino analysis

Long baseline experiments

Longbase Neutrino Physics. Neil McCauley University of Liverpool Birmingham February 2013

K2K and T2K experiments

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

JHFnu at J-PARC neutrino oscillation experiment

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

An Underground Laboratory for a Multi-Detector Experiment. Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

A Large Liquid Scintillator Detector for Neutrino Mass Hierarchy : RENO-50

The Double Chooz Project

PHYS 5326 Lecture #6. 1. Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2. Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

GADZOOKS! project at Super-Kamiokande

Recent Nucleon Decay Results from Super-Kamiokande

A study on different configurations of Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment

Outline. (1) Physics motivations. (2) Project status

Wei Wang University of Wisconsin-Madison. NNN09, Estes Park, Colorado, Oct 8, 2009

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~

Super-Kamiokande. Alexandre Zeenny, Nolwenn Lévêque

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 3 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Past, Present and Future of long baseline neutrino experiments. Apero SPP 16 September 2016 S.Bolognesi (CEA)

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Resolving Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and CP Degeneracy Using Two Identical Detectors with Different Baselines

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Neutrino Oscillation Tomography

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Super-KamiokaNDE: Beyond Neutrino Oscillations. A. George University of Pittsburgh

Search for Astrophysical Neutrino Point Sources at Super-Kamiokande

Sinergie fra ricerche con neutrini da acceleratore e atmosferici

Neutrino Experiment. Wei Wang NEPPSR09, Aug 14, 2009

Proton Decay searches -- sensitivity, BG and photo-coverage. Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory Masato Shiozawa

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

1 Introduction. 2 Nucleon Decay Searches

T2K neutrino oscillation results

Tsuyoshi Nakaya (Kyoto Univ.)

PoS(NEUTEL2015)009. Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande. Masayuki Nakahata for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration

The Search for θ13 : First Results from Double Chooz. Jaime Dawson, APC

Neutrinos. 20 December Alain Blondel DPNC seminar 16 november

Technological challenges of future Super Beam projects

Super-Kamiokande. Roger Wendell, Duke University NNN 2010 Toyama, Japan

Impression of NNN05. Kenzo NAKAMURA KEK. April 7-9, 2005 NNN05 Aussois, Savoie, France. K. Nakamura NNN05, Aussois, April 7-9,

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

C02: Investigation of Supernova Mechanism via Neutrinos. Mark Vagins Kavli IPMU, UTokyo

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments

Transcription:

Hyper-Kamiokande R&D Francesca Di Lodovico (QMUL) on behalf of the Hyper-Kamiokande working groups NNN13, Kavli, IPMU 11-13 November 013

The Hyper-Kamiokande Project Multi-purpose neutrino experiment. Main goal: CP violation Supernova Neutrino oscillations, using both: Neutrino beam from J-PARC (expected beam > 1MW) Sun Accelerator (J-PARC) Atmospheric neutrinos Search for proton decay Solar neutrinos Astrophysical neutrinos (supernova, dark matter, solar flare,...) Neutrino geophysics Proton decay

Hyper-Kamiokande Overview 5 x Super-Kamiokande 3

Hyper-Kamiokande Overview Water Cherenkov, proved technology & scalability: Excellent PID at sub-gev region >99% Large mass statistics always critical for any measurements. Total Volume 0.99 Megaton Inner Volume 0.74 Mton Fiducial Volume 0.56 Mton (0.056 Mton 10 compartments) Outer Volume 0.0 Mton Photo-sensors 99,000 0 Φ PMTs for Inner Detector (ID) (0% photo-coverage) 5,000 8 Φ PMTs for Outer Detector (OD) Tanks tanks, with egg-shape cross section 48m (w) 50m (t) 50 m (l) 5 x Super-Kamiokande 4

Outline Physics in a nutshell Letter of Intent, Hyper-K WG arxiv:1109.36 [hep-ex] and updates R&D Software (Beam &) Near Detectors Cavern Construction Detector Design PMTs Others Schedule and Summary 5

Physics in a Nutshell

Tokai--Hyper-Kamiokande Hyper-Kamiokande Natural extension of the technique being proven by the success of TK: Use J-PARC beam Hyper-K at 95km as Super-K Off-axis narrow-band beam E ~0.6 GeV Expected Unoscillated Neutrino Flux at Hyper-K 7

Expected Sensitivity to CP Violation CPV discovery sensitivity w/ mass hierarchy known. precision: < 10 for =0 (< 0 for =90 ) Assuming 5% nominal systematics and 0.750MW/y (3y beam and 7y -beam), 74% region of can be covered at 3 It corresponds to a precision of < 10 for =0. 8

Using Atmospherics Sensitivity mainly depends on 3,, and MH. 3 mass hierarchy determination for sin 3 > 0.4 (0.43) for normal (inverted) hierarchy (10y). Caveat: the method to determine is used. Ongoing work to use Qian et al., PRD 86, 113011 (01). Beam Map Atm. ν Map Add Atm. ν + Beam Hierarchy is unknown, but NH is true. True CP = 0.0; sin 13 = 0.10; sin 3 = 1.0 Degenerate solution exists at 3 for the beam-only case. 9

Proton Decay Sensitivities Surpass SK limit in ~1 year year 10 times better sensitivity than Super-K Hyper-K surpasses SK limits in ~1y p e 0 : 1.3 1035 y at 90%CL p K+:.5 1034 y at 90%CL Many other modes: (p,n) (e, ) + (,, ) K0 modes 0, +. 5y 10

Other Physics Topics at Hyper-K Solar Neutrinos: 00 ν s / day from Sun study of day/night asymmetry of the solar neutrinos flux. Astrophysical neutrinos: ~00k ν s from Supernova at Galactic center (10kpc) time variation & energy can be measured with high statistics For supernova explosions outside our galaxy, we expect ~30-50 events from M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) We expect ~310 SRN in the energy range ~30-50 MeV for 10y. Solar flare neutrinos can be detected by Hyper-K and will be a strong test of neutrino emission models. Indirect dark matter search. Geophysical neutrinos measurement of Earth's density. 11

R&D Software (Beam &) Near Detectors Cavern Construction Detector Design PMTs Others

WCSim WCSim is a flexibile Geant4-based simulation of a water-cherenkov detector with top and side photo-multiplier tubes. Developed by Duke University: https://wiki.bnl.gov/dusel/index.php/wcsim Implemented Hyper-Kamiokande egg-shape geometry (WCSim default: cylinder shape). Nominal Cylindrical Geometry Hyper-K egg-shape Implementation of Hyper-K egg-shape 13

WCSim WCSim is a flexibile Geant4-based simulation of a water-cherenkov detector with top and side photo-multiplier tubes. Developed by Duke University: https://wiki.bnl.gov/dusel/index.php/wcsim Implemented Hyper-Kamiokande egg-shape geometry (WCSim default: cylinder shape). e- 600MeV/c µ- 600MeV/c Ongoing work to develop software and more in general computing model for Hyper-K to be used in future physics studies. 14

(Beam &) Near Detectors Super-Kamiokande Hyper-Kamiokande 95 km February, 004 11 (Tokai)

Beam for Tokai--Hyper-Kamiokande Next upgrade (intermediate plan) towards a 750kW operation. See T. Sekigushi's talk for details on the upgrade. It will concern: Upgrade plan for J-PARC accelerators. Upgrade plan for the neutrino beam-line to accept a 750MW beam. 16

Near Detectors Currently two near detectors: INGRID, on-axis, for neutrino beam direction. ND80, off-axis, for spectrum measurement. TK Summer 013 e appearance measurement. Predicted number of events error reduction due to ND80: Ongoing discussion on ND80 possible upgrade for HyperKamiokande (THK). 17

Near Detector(s) New Near Detector(s) current under-investigation. Several options. Reduce the current systematic errors at Hyper-Kamiokande using: ND beam spectrum similar to HK spectrum same WC detector as Hyper-K 0 xsection measurement, good - separation,.. e e Energy spectrometer energy spectrometer ~1kton WC @ km Xsection view WC WC Muon Range Detector Inspired by 007 km TK proposal Poster #0, M. Hartz, M. Wilking 18

Cavern Construction

HK Technical Design Document Candidate Site: Tochibora Mine Located under Nijugo-yama (Mt. 5), ~8km south from Super-K. Identical baseline (95km) and off-axis angle (.5º) to TK. Overburden ~650m (~1755 m.w.e.). Nijugo-yama The candidate site vicinity was used for mining. Historically many surveys have been done in wide area and at several levels/depths, ex. mapping the location of faults. Many existing tunnels and shafts already escavated. 0

Geological Survey The rock mass characterization has been done by mapping the existing tunnels and geological logging of rock core samples. South-side Cavern North-side Cavern 1

Rock Mass Characterization From the survey results, rock mass characteristics are classified into 6 categories: A, B, CH, CM, CL and D (defined by CRIEPI). A (blue) is the highest grade rock and D (red) is lowest. Based on these results, HK tank location decided. (CRIEPI: The Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry) HK tank location For both caverns for the tank locations, 90% of bedrock is CH or higher grade.

Cavern Stability Initial stress measurements Plasticity region depth PS-anchor tension CH class (>70% at HK location) 5m 13m CM class (0~30% at HK location) Segmented wall surface of caverns Based on the survey results (rock mass characteristics and initial stresses), the structural stability of caverns was studied The excavation-steps were taken into account in the studies, including the cavern supporting material. For all rock mass classes (B, CH, CM), HK caverns can be constructed by existing excavation/support techniques. 3

Excavation Schedule Tunnel constructions Cavern excavation Cavern construction period: ~5 years Transport / approach tunnels: ~3 years Excavation of caverns: ~3 years 4

H-K Tanaka Geological Survey at Mozumi Mine Geological survey at the Mozumi mine, already used for Super-K, recently started. It should allow to have deeper caverns (> 700m overburden). First rock mass characterization has been done: rock quality at Mozumi-site is comparable with Tochibora-site More tests under way to complete the geological survey. 5

Detector Design

Hyper-K Tanks Fiducial volume Inner Detector Two water tanks: 54m(H) x 48m(W) x 50m(L) / tank Water tanks are segmented into 10 compartments 5 compartments / tank Each compartment optically separated and consists of Inner Detector (ID) and Outer Detector (OD) 7

Water Containment System Tank lining consists of concrete (60cm) and Polyethylene (5mm) linings welded Polyethylene sheet Drain lines are separated for sump water and leak-water from tank. Drain pipe (for leak water from tank) Drain pipes (for sump water) HDPE lining Concrete lining Waterproof sheet Shotcrete Rock 8

Photo-sensor Support Number of photo-sensors: Inner Detector (ID): ~99,000 of 0 (0% photo coverage) Outer Detector (OD): ~5,000 of 8 (identical coverage to SK) Stainless-steel supporting structure holds photo-sensors Inner PMT (0 ) Barrel part Segmentation wall Mounting Photo-sensor Housing 9 9

Designing work... The major part of HK tank has been designed. Include layout of water pipes, front-end electronics, cables, calibration holes, plug manholes,... etc. Water piping layout Electronics & cable layout Photo-sensor housing : Inner top pipe : Inner barrel pipe : Inner bottom pipe : Outer top pipe : Outer barrel pipe : Outer bottom pipe : Inlet/Outlet 3960mm 5940mm Calibration holes Plug manhole : Support structure : Cable for inner PMT : Cable for outer PMT : Network/Power cable : Hub / Front End Electronics : Inner photo-sensor (0 ) : Outer photo-sensor (8 ) 30

Tank construction schedule Cavern Tank 1 year Lining PMT & support Tank construction: ~ years Lining: 1+ years, PMT installation: ~1 year 31

Hyper-K photo-sensor working group See F. Retiere's talk for details on types of HK photosensors 8'' HPD Testing 0ns Integrated Charge Distribution 90ns 8mV 1 p.e. 1p.e. Pedestal p.e. 3p.e. P/V ratio ~4 (~1.7 for 0 PMTs) 1 p.e. 1.ns σ Waveform from HPD output Peak Valley Pre-test performed before installation in a 00ton tank. Confirmed that the basic performance was good P/V: ~4, TTS: ~1ns, Dark rate: comparable to 0 PMTs, 3

Tests in a Water Cherenkov Detector EGADS detector : a 00 ton scale model of Super-K To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of SK + Gadolinium 40 inward-facing photodetectors Electronics : ATMs (used in SK-1,,3), to be upgraded to QBEEs (SK4) Eight 8 HPDs and five 0 high-qe PMTs were mounted Other 7 photodetectors are R3600, and can be used as references for the new photodetector evaluation EGADS 00t tank ~7m 8 HPDs 0 high-qe PMTs 33

Photodector Installation in EGADS HPD with supporting frame All 40 photodetectors were installed in July-August 0 High-QE PMT Water-proof cable connection 8 HPD Cable connection in the tank 34

Testing in EGADS: Multi p.e.s peaks by HPDs EGADS is in the commissioning phase Initial tests with new photosensors started. Output linearity 500 Charge [pc] 3000 1 p.e. 000 p.e.s 1500 3 p.e.s 1000 4 p.e.s 500 0 0 10 0 30 0 18 16 14 1 10 8 6 4 0 0 χ / ndf 1.3 / p0 0.0789 ± 0.01833 p1 3.7 ± 0.01093 1 40 Charge [pc] 4 5 Peak resolution Peak resolution [σ] Multi photoelectron peaks are clearly visible. About 30% σ at 1 p.e. peak 3 Number of photoelectrons χ / ndf 13.03 / Prob 0.001479 p0 0.3653 ± 0.00899 p1-0.09764 ± 0.00676 0.5 0. 0.15 0.1 0.05 1 3 4 Number of Photoelectrons 35

Future Tests Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. is making prototypes of New 0 PMT (Box&Line dynode) 0 HPD Planning to start tests in this year Future: continue tests at different facilities: EGADS 1kton WC prototype (construction 016-17) Other facilities (KEK, Kashiwa, TRIUMF,...) 36

Other R&D Water system Readout electronics Calibration system DAQ... Progress within the international working group 37

Schedule & Summary

Overall Project Schedule Overall Hyper-K construction: ~7 years 39

The Hyper-Kamiokande Project Three International Open Meetings (01-013) so far. Formed international working groups. August 1-3, 01 http://indico.ipmu.jp/indico/conferencedisplay.py?confid=7 June 1-, 013 http://indico.ipmu.jp/indico/conferencedisplay.py?confid=3 January 14-15, 013 http://indico.ipmu.jp/indico/conferencedisplay.py?confid=10 Next meeting: 7-8 January 014, Kavli, IPMU. First EU Open Meeting 18 December 013, London http://indico.cern.ch/e/hkeuopenmeeting 40

Summary Hyper-K covers wide range of physics: Neutrino oscillation with beam-ν & atmospheric-ν Main goal: CP violation Nucleon decay search and astrophysical neutrinos R&D started in all areas and progressing: - Software - (Beam &) Near Detectors - Cavern Construction (technical design document ready) - Detector Design - PMTs - Others (electronics, DAQ, water system, calibration, etc.) Japan HEP community: HK at highest priority. Strongly growing international community. Next Hyper-K Open Meeting: January 7-8, Kavli, IPMU. 41

Backup Slides

e Probability Cij =cos θij, S ij =sin θ ij Φ=Δ mij L 4 Eν Leading term 13 +8C13 S 1 S 13 (C 1 C 13 cos δ S 1 S13 S 3 )cos Φ 3 sin Φ 3 sin Φ1 CPC CPV P( νμ ν e)=4c13 S 13 S3 sin Φ 31 8C13 C 1 C 3 S1 S 13 S 3 sin δ sin Φ3 sin Φ 31 sin Φ 1 1 13 1 3 1 3 13 - for P( e) + 4S C (C C + S S S C1 C 3 S 1 S 3 S 13 cos δ)sin Φ 1 al 8C13 S1 S 3 (1 S13 )cos Φ 3 sin Φ31 4 Eν a +8C13 S 13 S3 (1 S )sin Φ31 13 Δ m13 a= G Solar Matter Effect 5 F ne E=7.56 10 ev ρ E 3 gcm GeV Leading Term sin 13 CPV Term sin 13 Matter Effect sin 13 For large sin 13: Signal, CP Asymmetry, Matter/CP 43

e Probability Cij =cos θij, S ij =sin θ ij Φ=Δ mij L 4 Eν Leading term 13 +8C13 S 1 S 13 (C 1 C 13 cos δ S 1 S13 S 3 )cos Φ 3 sin Φ 3 sin Φ1 CPC CPV P( νμ ν e)=4c13 S 13 S3 sin Φ 31 8C13 C 1 C 3 S1 S 13 S 3 sin δ sin Φ3 sin Φ 31 sin Φ 1 1 13 1 3 1 3 13 + 4S C (C C + S S S C1 C 3 S 1 S 3 S 13 cos δ)sin Φ 1 al 8C13 S1 S 3 (1 S13 )cos Φ 3 sin Φ31 4 Eν a +8C13 S 13 S3 (1 S )sin Φ31 13 Δ m13 a= G Comparison between P( e) and P( e): - for P( e) Solar Matter Effect 5 F ne E=7.56 10 ev ρ E 3 gcm GeV Difference P( e) and P( e) as large as ~±5% at nominal (δ=0) 44

Simulated e Candidates after Selection Full simulation of beam, detector response and reconstruction PMT Coverage: ~0% ~000 ~ 3600 events in and beams, respectively Major backgrounds: beam e/ e and NC- 0 45

Neutrino Energy Distribution: Effect of 0.75MW 3y 0.75MW 7y =½ = = 3/ Difference from =0: Number + shape sensitive to all values of 46

Expected Sensitivity to CP Violation Fractional region of for which the CPV (sin 0) significance is > 3 5% systematics on signal, BG, e BG, / 47

Atmospheric Neutrinos e appearance and distortion are expected due to the MSW effect in the Earth's matter: Mass hierarchy: asymmetry between neutrinos and antineutrinos Octant of oscillation: appearance (and disappearance) interplay CP phase (and 13):magnitude of resonance effect. P(νµ νe) Interference Solar Term Matter Sub-GeV Φ (ν e ) Solar Term 1 P (r cos θ 3 1) Φ0 (ν e ) r sin θ 13 cos θ 13 sin θ 3 (cos δ R sin δ I ) + sin θ 13 (r sin θ3 1) P=P (ν e ν μ, τ ) Multi-GeV Interference Matter Effect R and I are the oscillation amplitudes for CP even and odd terms 48

Oscillated e flux relative to the non-oscillated flux as a function of the neutrino energy for the up-ward going neutrinos with zenith angle 0.8 Through matter effect (MSW), we study: Mass Hierarchy: asymmetry between and Octant of 3: e appearance and disappearance interplay CP (and 13): magnitude of resonance effect 49

Mass Hierarchy Sensitivity 10 years Multi-GeV νe-like events Multi-GeV νe-like events Sensitivity mainly depends on 3, Also some dependence on the mass hierarchy. 3 mass hierarchy determination for sin 3 > 0.4 (0.43) for normal (inverted) hierarchy for 10y data taking. Caveat: the method to determine the number of 's is used. 50

Sensitivity to δcp and θ13 (No Reactor Constraint, NH) sinθ13 = 0.10 σινθ3 = 0.50 sinθ13 = 0.10 σινθ3 = 0.50 µ3 =.4ξ10 3 ες µ3 =.4ξ10 3 ες δχπ = 0.698 (40 δεγ ) δχπ = 0.698 ( 40 δεγ )

Sensitivity to δcp and θ13 (No Reactor Constraint, NH) sinθ13 = 0.10 sinθ3 = 0.50 m3 =.4x10-3 ev δcp =.443 (140 deg ) sinθ13 = 0.10 sinθ3 = 0.50 m3 =.4x10-3 ev δcp =.443 ( 140 deg )

Atmospheric Neutrino Sensitivity Summary Objective Hierarchy Octant Normal Inverted Comment σ sinθ3 > 0.96 sinθ3 > 0.96 3σ sinθ3 > 0.4 sinθ3 > 0.4 σ sinθ3 > 0.997 sinθ3 > 0.99 5 years 3σ sinθ3 > 0.99 sinθ3 > 0.97 5 years 5 years 10 years 53

Sensitivity for 3 Octant and CPV 3 octant sensitivity. Thickness of the band corresponds to the uncertainty from CP. sin 13 = 0.098 sin 13 = 0.098 θ13 is fixed : sinθ13 = 0.099 NH IH Excluded 3 CP fraction. Sensitivity to CP-violation is limited under both hierarchy assumptions. 54

Nucleon Decays Only direct probe of Grand Unified Theories Many GUT models predict decays of protons and bound neutrons with = O(1034-35) years. Two modes favoured by many models: p e+ 0 Other modes are also important. p k+ 55

Experimental Limits Most stringent limits from Super-K for many decay modes. No signal evidence has been found give constraints on models. After 15y Super-K running (0kton years): (p e+ 0)>1.3 1034 y (p k+) > 4.0 1033 y @90%CL Order of magnitude necessary to be significant. 56