LANDFORM ANALYSIS AND SOIL RESOURCE INVENTORY USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUE IN A WATERSHED OF UTTARANCHAL, INDIA

Similar documents
Delineation and Characterization of Purvi Nayyar River Watershed in Mid- Himalayan Region of India Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques

Soils of the GLBRC Marginal Land Experiment (MLE) Sites

Monitoring and modelling hydrological fluxes in support of nutrient cycling studies in Amazonian rain forest ecosystems Tobon-Marin, C.

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 5, No 2, 2014

On-Site Soils Investigation. Buttermilk Way Storm water Treatment Project Buzzards Bay. MA. February 28 th, 2012

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 1, No 1, 2010

Appendix I SOIL RATING CHART. (Storie soil Index Rating = factor A* factor B* factor C* factor X) FACTOR A- Rating on character of Physical Profile

11. METHODOLOGY FOR MAPPING WATERLOGGED AND SALINE AREAS IN PART OF HANUMANGARH DISTRICT, RAJASTHAN (RAW

MINERALOGICAL ALTERATIONS OF SOIL IRRIGATED WITH ACIDIC MINE WATER IN THE ALAMOSA RIVER BASIN

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(8):

Inventory of Soil Resources of Narmada District, Gujarat Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques

Parent Materials. & some of Seattle s soils

Geospatial Approach for Delineation of Landslide Susceptible Areas in Karnaprayag, Chamoli district, Uttrakhand, India

Supplementary Material: Crop & Pasture Science, 2013, 64(12),

4. Soils and soil conditions

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

TEXTURE ANALYSIS. Unknown 1 Unknown 2. Unknown 3 6O 6O O Z 14X 10Z X X 8Z

Figure DR3. Constraints on the depth of the hiatus surface based on 10 Be concentration of middle core sample.

Change Detection in Landuse and landcover using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques

GROUNDWATER CONFIGURATION IN THE UPPER CATCHMENT OF MEGHADRIGEDDA RESERVOIR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Inventory of Soil Resources of Dimapur District, Nagaland State Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques

Standards and Procedures for Site Specific Soil Mapping in Rhode Island. Pg 1

SOILS RELATIVE TO GEOLOGY AND LANDFORMS IN WALNUT GULCH EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED, ARIZONA, USA. W. R. Osterkamp, D. J. Breckenfeld, and J.J.

GIS Based Delineation of Micro-watershed and its Applications: Mahendergarh District, Haryana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Soil Formation. Lesson Plan: NRES B2-4

Wastelands Analysis and Mapping of Bhiwani District, Haryana

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Soil Erosion Calculation using Remote Sensing and GIS in Río Grande de Arecibo Watershed, Puerto Rico

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 3, No 1, 2012

Inventory of Soil Resources of Dhalai District, Tripura State Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques


Lowest and Youngest Terrace : Soil Pit #4

Monday, October 15 th Grab a textbook! Objective: We will explain the formation of different soils and classify soils according to particle size.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Scientific registration n : 2180 Symposium n : 35 Presentation : poster MULDERS M.A.

Soil Formation. Parent Material. Time. Climate

Environmental Impact Assessment Land Use and Land Cover CISMHE 7.1 INTRODUCTION

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

SOIL INFORMATION FOR PUMPED WATER STORAGE SCHEME, STEELPOORT VALLEY

ABSTRACT. Watershed management has emerged as a new paradigm for planning,

Science EOG Review: Landforms

[Penumaka, 7(1): January-March 2017] ISSN Impact Factor

Sub-watershed prioritization based on potential zones of Kuttiadi river basin, A Geo-Morphometric approach using GIS

Assembling information to develop ecological site and state and transition concepts. Brandon Bestelmeyer, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM

Floodplain modeling. Ovidius University of Constanta (P4) Romania & Technological Educational Institute of Serres, Greece

6W9}* Appendix 2 to report No. P62 SOIL RESOURCES MAP OF TH E MPEKETONIAREA (LAMU AND TANA RIVER DISTRICTS) 40" 40 E LEGEND ISWC U8RAWY _& Jl W*g*n)ng

APPLICATION OF REMOTE SENSING & GIS ON LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONE IDENTIFICATION & MANAGEMENT

MAFF Ministry of IfiriLE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

Assessing Vulnerability to Soil Erosion of a Watershed of Tons River Basin in Madhya Pradesh using Remote Sensing and GIS

Soil Profiles (West, Ch. 8)

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 2, No 1, 2011

Table 9. FAI accession log

ABSTRACT. 2. Location : 31 o 04'16'' to 32 o 31'27'' North Latitudes and 74 o 30'38'' to 76 o 08'45'' East Longitudes

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 6, No 2, 2015

Surface Water and Stream Development

Comparison of Geomatics Approach and Mathematical Model in Assessment of Soil Erosion Prone Areas Kolli Hills, Namakkal District Tamilnadu, India

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Weathering, Erosion and Deposition

Need of Proper Development in Hilly Urban Areas to Avoid

LANDSAT-TM IMAGES IN GEOLOGICAL MAPPING OF SURNAYA GAD AREA, DADELDHURA DISTRICT WEST NEPAL

Ground Water Potential Mapping in Chinnar Watershed (Koneri Sub Watershed) Using Remote Sensing & GIS

HEBER D. LESSIG U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Box 248, Lisbon, Ohio

BURIED SOILS OF GLOBE HILL, UPPER OHIO VALLEY

Rocks and Weathering

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEHRADUN

Appendix G. Stony Creek Project

Watershed Development Prioritization by Applying WERM Model and GIS Techniques in Takoli Watershed of District Tehri (Uttarakhand)

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.2 OBJECTIVE

Application of Remote Sensing and GIS for Identification and Assessment Proceedings of AIPA 2012, INDIA 79

Figure 2.1: Constituent Area

Science and Health EFFECT OF EROSION ON THE CONDITION OF SOIL AND LAND SHAPE

HYDROGEOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES FOR GROUND WATER PROSPECTS USING IRS -1D, LISS III IMAGE, IN PARTS OF AGRA DISTRICT ALONG THE YAMUNA RIVER, U.P.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 2, No 2, 2011

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 2: Understanding Soil Formation

Soils of Rhode Island

Biosphere. All living things, plants, animals, (even you!) are part of the zone of the earth called the biosphere.

Ecoregions Glossary. 7.8B: Changes To Texas Land Earth and Space

Key Reference Site 7. Site details. Climate 5. Queensland Key Reference Sites. Site location. Soil and landscape correlation. June 2006 QKRS 7-1

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Potential Groundwater Accumulations Assessment in Drought Prone Area using Remote Sensing and GIS Technology


Geology of the Black River and Paw Paw River Watersheds. Dr. Tara Kneeshaw Grand Valley State University Department of Geology

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

Landslide Disasters in Uttarakhand: A Case of Landslide Susceptibility Zonation of Alaknanda Valley in Garhwal Himalaya

Chitra Sood, R.M. Bhagat and Vaibhav Kalia Centre for Geo-informatics Research and Training, CSK HPKV, Palampur , HP, India

Abstract: About the Author:

HYDRIC SOILS. Background

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION FOR INTEGRATED WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT BY APPLYING REMOTE SENSING AND GIS TECHNIQUES

Relationships between soils and elevation along toposequence in east Cache valley

EU-level landslide susceptibility assessment

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 ISSN

Soil Factors and their Influence on Within-Field Crop Variability. I: Field Observation of Soil Variation

Transcription:

LANDFORM ANALYSIS AND SOIL RESOURCE INVENTORY USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUE IN A WATERSHED OF UTTARANCHAL, INDIA S.K.Mahapatra *, D. Martin, R.D.Sharma, S.P. Singh and J.P.Sharma National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, IARI Campus, New Delhi-110012, India sankarkmahapatra@yahoo.co.in KEY WORDS: Physiography, soil map, IRS data, ABSTRACT: The IRS-1D LISS III false colour composite (FCC) decoded imagery belonging to Kosi river watershed of Almora district of Uttaranchal under warm humid Lesser Himalayan agro-ecological region was interpreted and surveyed for soil resource mapping. On the basis of image interpretation and ground truth study ten physiographic units were identified. Soil physiography relationship was established on correlation of the soil-site characteristics and physico-chemical properties of soils. Based on the image characteristics and soil-physiography relationship soil map of the area was prepared. The study revealed that the remote sensing technique was useful in delineating physiographic units and inventory of soil resources in remote/inaccessible areas of mountainous lands, which are important for watershed management as well as agricultural development of an area. INTRODUCTION The development of hill and mountain areas and protection of their ecology have become matters of national concern in recent years. These areas differ from the plains in topography, elevation, physiographic feature, diversity of habitats for flora and fauna, ethnic diversity, land use systems and socio-economic conditions. In accessibility, fragility, marginality, heterogeneity, natural instability and human adoption mechanism are the key factors to be focused for sustainable agricultural development in such areas. Soil is the most important natural resource which should be managed effectively, efficiently and optimally for sustainable agricultural production in these areas. Utility of the remote sensing data in such areas has been successfully exploited by Ahuja et al. (1992). Kundu et. al., (1999), Saxena et al., (2000) and Martin et al., (2001). For landform interpretation and extrapolating the information derived from remote sensing data on terrain data to the inaccessible areas. Thus, the present study has been undertaken to identify the kind and distribution of different soils and their problems and potentials in a watershed of Almora district of Uttaranchal for sustainable productivity. METHODOLOGY The study area belongs to Kosi river watershed spread over Almora-Takula area (29º 41' to 29º 46' N and 79º 39' to 79º 45' E ) of Almora district of Uttaranchal. The area is under warm humid Lesser Himalayan agro-ecological region. The elevation ranges from 800-2400 m above MSL. A 3 tier approach was adopted to carry out soil resource mapping viz. image interpretation, ground truth checking and mapping. The IRS-1D LISS III false colour composite (FCC) decoded imageries of bands 2,3 and 4 on 1:50,000 scale and Survey of India toposheets on same scale were used for the study. Based on image characteristics such as colour, texture, size, pattern, location and association and physiographic approach with element analysis (relief, erosion, land use, drainage and vegetation), visual interpretation was undertaken to delineate the physiographic units. Ground truth study was conducted to confirm the physiographic units. Soils of each physiographic unit were studied in the field and soil samples were collected for their characterization. (Black 1965, Jackson 1966). Soils are classified as per Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1998). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION On the basis of image interpretation and ground truth study ten physiographic units were identified in the study area (Table.1). Soil map is depicted in figure.1 and morphological and physico-chemical properties are presented in table.2 and 3, respectively. Soils of escarpments/cliffs occur on steep to very steep slopes and are very shallow, excessively drained, gravelly sandy loam to loam, brown to dark brown in colour, slightly acidic in reaction and developed on mica schist (Lithic Udorthents). Main constraints are rockiness and severe to very severe erosion with low nutrient retention capacity. Soils of summits/ridge tops occur on moderate slope to very steep slopes and are moderately shallow to very shallow, excessively drained, gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam, brown to dark reddish brown in colour, slightly acidic to neutral and developed on mica schist/quartzite/shale (Lithic/Typic Udorthents). In some areas soils are deep and heavy textured. Major constraints are gravelliness, rockiness and severe erosion with low to medium nutrient retention capacity. The area is mostly covered under shrubs and forest and also cultivation in some areas. Soils of side/reposed slopes occur on moderate slopes to very steep slopes and are shallow to very deep, well drained to excessively drained, sandy loam to loam, gravelly loam in texture, brown to yellowish brown and dark reddish brown in colour, slightly acidic and developed on mica schist/quartzite/shale (Lthic/Typic Udorthents, Typic Dystrudepts). Major constraints are gravelliness and moderate to severe erosion with low nutrient retention capacity. They are mostly covered under forest and cultivation in lower areas. Soils of valleys occur on gentle to moderate steep slopes and are moderately to very deep, well drained to somewhat excessively drained, loamy sand to clay loam in texture, yellowish brown to dark yellowish brown in colour, slightly acidic to neutral and developed on colluvium/alluvium (Typic Udorthents/Typic Dystrudepts). They are mostly under cultivation on terraces and also forests on sloping lands. Major constraints are gravelliness and moderate erosion with low to medium nutrient retention capacity. CONCLUSION The study revealed that the remote sensing technique was useful in delineating physiographic units and inventory of soil resources in remote/inaccessible areas of mountainous lands,

which are important for watershed management as well as agricultural development of an area. REFERENCES Ahuja, R.L., Manchanda, M.L. Sangwan, B.S. Goyal, V.P. and Agarwal, R.P. (1992). Utilization of Remotely sensed data for soil resource mapping and its interpretation for land use planning of Bhiwani district, Haryana. J. of India Soc. Of Remote Sensing. 20 (2&3), pp. 105-120. Black, C.A. (ed.) (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis; Part I, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A. Jackson, M.L. (1966). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd; New Delhi. Kundu, B.S. and Mothi Kumar, K.E. (1995). Mapping and Management of flood affected areas through remote sensing. A case study of Sirsa district, Haryana. J. Ind. Soc. Remote Sensing. 23 (3), pp. 139-146. Martin D., Mahapatra S.K., Singh, S.P. and Dhankar, R.P. (2001). Landform analysis of warm humid kumaon Himalayas using IRS-ID data for development of mountainous lands. Nat. Symp. Remote Sensing Technology with special emphasis on High resolution Imagery, held at Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad from Dec. 9-11, 2001. pp: WR-36&37. Saxena, R.K. Verma, K.S., Chari, G.K., Srivastava, R. and Bhartawal, A.K. (2000). RS IC data application in watershed characterization and management Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21(7): 3179-3208. Soil Survey Staff (1998). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, NRCS, Washington D.C., USA.

Table. 1 Interpretation of image characteristics U n i t Image Characteristics Physiographic Unit Dominant soils 1 Medium brown to dark grayish and mottled colour with course to rough texture and small, irregularly scattered grains. 2 Brownish and mottled colour, medium to coarse texture with small, irregular and scattered grains. 3 Reddish brown and mottled colour, medium to coarse texture with small, irregular and scattered grains 4 Medium brown with coarse mottled colour, smooth to medium coarse texture, evenly scattered fine grains 5 Reddish with medium brown colour, mottled and medium smooth texture and irregular, medium scattered grains 6 Medium gray to light brown with medium smooth, light mottling 7 Reddish to medium brown with pale yellowish patches & smooth, medium mottled texture 8 Yellowish to light green with smooth, fine mottled texture and irregular, fine scattered grains 9 Light green with white patches in diffuse manner and fine mottled appearance 10 Light bluish tone with scattered white patches in diffused and irregular grains Escarpments/cliffs Very steeply sloping summits/ridge tops with open scrubs Moderately steeply sloping summits/ridge tops with pine forest. Moderately sloping summits/ridge tops under cultivation. Very steeply sloping side/reposed slopes with open scrubs. Steeply sloping side/reposed slopes with open scrubs. Steeply sloping side/reposed slopes under cultivation. Moderately steeply sloping side/reposed slopes under cultivation Moderately sloping side/reposed slopes under cultivation Terraced valleys Very shallow, gravelly sandy loam soils of brown colour developed on sandstone/quartzite Moderately shallow, sandy loam soils of dark yellowish brown colour developed over quartzite Moderately deep, sandy loam soils of dark yellowish brown colour developed over quartzite Deep, gravelly loam to clay loam soils of dark yellowish brown colour developed from quartzite Moderately deep, gravelly loam soils of dark brown colour developed from quartzite Deep, gravelly loam soils of dark yellowish brown colour developed from quartzite Moderately shallow, loam soils of dark brown colour developed from colluvium Deep, gravelly sandy loam soils of dark yellowish brown colour developed from colluvium Deep, sandy loam over loamy sand soils of dark brown to dark yellowish brown colour developed over alluvium Very deep, loam soils of dark brown colour developed from alluvium/colluvium

Table. 2 Morphological Characteristics of Soils Soils Horizon Depth Boundary Colour Texture Structure (cm) Rawani A 0-9 Clear, smooth Brown Sandy loam Massive C 9-35 Abrupt, smooth Brown Sandy loam Massive R 35-47 Unconsolidated Rock Sunsari A 0-9 Clear, smooth Brown Silt loam Massive C 9-22 Abrupt, smooth Brown Silt loam Massive R 22-50 Clear, smooth Dark brown 50-71 Unconsolidated Rock Thouli A1 0-9 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive A12 9-26 Smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive AC 26-42 Abrupt, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam Chimtakhal A1 0-9 Clear, smooth Strong brown Gravelly loam Massive A12 9-28 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly loamy sand Massive AC 28-43 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly loam C 43+ Baseri Ap 0-14 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive Bw1 14-35 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive Bw2 35-68 Gradual, smooth Strong brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive Bw3 68-86 Gradual, smooth Lightly yellowish brown Gravelly sandy loam f 1 sbk AC 86-105 Lightly yellowish brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive C 67+ Unconsolidated Rock Manila Ap 0-16 Clear, smooth Brown Loam Massive A12 16-35 Clear, smooth Dark yellowish Clay loam f 1 sbk Bw1 35-56 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Clay loam f 2 sbk Bw2 56-80 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Clay loam m 2 sbk Bw3 80-105 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Clay loam m 2 sbk Bw4 105-135 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Clay loam m 2 sbk BC 135-158 Clay loam m 1 sbk Chillanoula A11 0-7 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose A12 7-23 Clear, smooth Dark yellowish brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose A13 23-42 Clear, smooth Grayish brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose AC 42-67 Clear, smooth Grayish brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose C 67-90 Gravelly loamy sand Loose R Unconsolidated Rock f1 sbk Jala A11 0-15 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive A12 15-38 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive C1 38-60 Gradual, smooth Gradual brown Gravelly sandy loam Massive C2 60-74 Clear, smooth Light brown Kharkhat A11 0-13 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Gradual sandy loam Massive A12 13-34 Gradual, smooth Brown Gradual sandy loam Massive AC 34-49 Abrupt, smooth Brown Gradual sandy loam f & sbk C 47+74 Unconsolidated Rock Brown Gradual sandy loam f1 sbk R Unconsolidated Rock f1 sbk Kapharkhan Ap 0-11 Clear, smooth Brown Loamy sand Massive

A12 11-36 Clear, smooth Dark yellowish brown Loamy sand Massive AC 36-63 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Loamy sand Massive C1 63-97 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Loamy sand C2 97+ Severely stony & Rocky Naugaon A 0-10 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly loamy sand Massive AC 10-25 Clear, smooth Yellow brown Gravelly sand Massive C 25-40 Gradual, smooth Yellow brown Gravelly sand Rinchi A11 0-9 Clear, smooth Dark grayish brown Sandy loam Massive A12 9-24 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam f sbk A13 24-39 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam m l sbk AC 39-54 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam m l sbk C1 54-72 Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam m l sbk C2 72+ Gradual, smooth Brown Gravelly sandy loam m l sbk Jalikhan A11 0-10 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly loam Massive A12 10-33 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly clay loam Massive A13 33-50 Gradual, smooth Strong brown Gravelly clay loam f 1 sbk AC 50-74 Gradual, smooth Lightly yellowish brown Gravelly clay loam m 1 sbk C 74-97 Severely stoney Bajyolia Ap 0-20 Clear, smooth Brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose AC1 20-40 Clear, smooth Dark yellowish brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose AC2 40-60 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose AC3 60-80 Dark yellowish brown Gravelly loamy sand Loose Bhikyasen A11 0-18 Clear, smooth Brown Sand Single grain A12 18-33 Gradual, smooth Brown Sand Single grain A13 33-62 Gradual, smooth Brown Sand Single grain A14 62-84 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Sand Single grain AC 84-105 Gradual, smooth Dark yellowish brown Sand Single grain C 105-130 Dark yellowish brown Coarse sand Single grain

Table. 3 Physico- chemical Characteristics of Soils Soils Depth (cm) ph (1:2.5) EC (dsm -1 ) O.C. (g kg -1 ) Sand Silt Clay CEC {C mol Base saturation (p+) kg -1 } ( % ) Rawari 0-12 5.81 0.15 0.86 61.9 24.0 13.75 6.05 69.5 Sunsari 0-9 5.78 0.18 1.47 31.45 53.85 15.00 7.85 63.8 9-22 5.64 0.18 1.07 31.45 56.05 12.50 Thouli 0-14 14-32 5.27 5.88 0.23 1.14 0.54 60.4 64.0 25.1 22.9 14.5 13.2 7.82 6.10 65.7 68.6 Chimtakhal 0-9 9-28 28-43 5.55 5.35 5.24 3.03 1.06 0.68 40.80 40.30 37.60 35.95 37.20 37.40 23.25 22..50 25.00 12.50 11.50 12.00 61.36 58.0 55.75 Baseri 0-14 14-31 31-50 50-68 68-86 86-105 Manila 0-16 16-35 35-56 56-80 80-105 105-135 135-158 4.74 5.52 6.12 6.39 6.91 6.77 4.96 6.46 6.91 7.17 7.47 7.47 7.45 0.93 0.37 0.33 0.17 0.93 0.30 0.17 0.17 1.85 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.17 1.11 4.17 0.87 0.52 0.41 0.37 0.25 76.00 59.19 54.80 57.66 55.48 53.82 36.66 28.88 32.96 38.48 34.55 23.27 31.41 15.75 31.06 33.95 28.84 29.77 32.93 37.50 43.75 43.75 37.75 37.25 38.75 39.75 08.25 09.75 11.25 13.50 14.75 13.25 25.25 27.25 23.75 23.25 28.25 37.50 29.25 3.82 4.08 4.08 3.26 4.28 4.08 13.65 12.45 11.85 11.00 11.70 09.30 09.50 61.78 66.91 66.91 65.35 60.04 64.95 58.20 74.77 82.32 83.15 82.32 84.35 86.26 Chillanoula 0-7 7-23 23-42 42-67 67-90 Jala 0-13 13-32 32-58 58-83 Kharkhet 0-13 13-34 5.97 5.87 5.88 5.89 5.89 5.36 5.76 5.74 5.95 5.44 5.20 0.36 0.24 0.91 0.24 0.21 0.39 0.48 0.96 1.53 1.53 1.45 1.41 3.64 1.17 0.84 0.53 2.803 2.496 56.55 58.00 54.15 55.10 65.30 55.4 61.1 64.0 61.2 48.1 38.48 24.95 22.50 26.60 26.40 18.70 33.5 28.5 19.0 26.7 31.5 40.25 18.50 19.50 19.25 18.50 16.00 11.0 18.2 16.2 12.0 20.5 25.25 10.00 09.60 08.50 08.00 06.70 9.92 10.06 8.96 6.24 9.75 10.65 63.60 60.20 59.41 61.75 66.22 58.6 60.5 62.4 63.6 92.82 91.25

34-49 49-74 5.44 5.25 0.25 0.37 2.112 2.728 38.69 33.86 95.5 45.25 23.75 24.75 10.35 10.95 95.84 97.71 Kapharkhan 0-14 14-33 33-51 51-70 5.97 6.27 6.58 6.51 0.32 0.10 0.22 1.07 0.49 0.34 0.30 75.8 74.0 75.6 72.2 19.7 21.5 18.7 23.5 4.5 4.2 5.5 4.2 2.55 1.95 2.55 1.25 56.5 58.2 60.3 62.4 Naugaon 0-12 12-32 32-48 6.34 6.43 6.51 0.76 0.38 0.23 82.4 86.9 88.8 16.2 8.5 8.2 1.5 4.5 3.2 1.02 2.21 1.53 59.5 62.4 64..7 Rinchi 0-16 16-39 39-67 5.2 5.4 5.2 0.48 0.25 0.37 2.49 2.11 1.72 38.4 34.6 33.8 40.2 41.5 41.2 21.5 23.7 24.7 16.64 16.82 15.94 53.2 55.4 59.4 Jalikhan 0-10 10-33 33-50 50-74 74-97 6.12 5.84 5.94 5.69 4.78 2.6 0.10 0.90 0.23 0.18 1.989 0.643 0.546 0.234 0.154 46.21 38.2 33.95 36.3 46.6 37.3 37.5 38.3 38.3 37.2 16.3 34.5 27.75 25.5 22.2 5.69 4.67 4.45 4.13 4.12 66.43 71.30 95.28 66.34 91.50 Bajyolia 1-20 0-40 40-60 60-80 5.73 7.90 6.50 6.67 0.41 0.71 0.28 0.15 0.15 84.68 84.21 83.96 81.67 4.50 5.75 4.25 8.50 10.75 10.50 11.75 10.25 5.50 5.40 4.90 4.50 85.09 76.89 82.44 91.11 Bhikyasen 0-18 18-33 33-62 62-84 84-105 105-130 5.86 5.56 5.66 5.65 5.55 5.44 0.36 0.24 0.11 0.81 0.75 0.71 0.25 0.11 92.0 93.15 91.80 89.30 90.50 90.18 4.80 4.10 4.20 7.20 5.50 7.82 3.00 2.75 4.00 3.50 4.00 2.00 1.53 1.27 1.27 1.02 1.02 1.02 72.54 74.80 67.71 73.52 73.32 65.68

Figure.1 Soils of the Watershed