Oregon APA Legal Issues Workshop December 7, Tricia Sears, DLCD With information from Bill Burns, DOGAMI

Similar documents
On Page 1, following Paragraph 2 of the Planning Participants subsection, insert the following: 2012 Committee members included:

RISK ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY PROFILE NATURAL HAZARDS COMMUNITY RISK PROFILES. Page 13 of 524

2014 Russell County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update STAKEHOLDERS AND TECHNICAL ADVISORS MEETING 2/6/14

Baldwin County, Alabama

West Carroll Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 25, 2015 Oak Grove, LA

Interpretive Map Series 24

Landslide & Coastal Erosion Risk Reduction at Oregon s Water/Wastewater Networks

Table G - 6. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Kent ( ) (From Wilkin County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

B.2 Sources for Hazard Identification, Profiling, and Ranking (Section 3) Overview of Sussex County s History of Hazards

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A TORNADO STRIKES THE COMMUNITY? Carroll County Sheriff s Office Emergency Management

IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Disaster RISK Management : Bhutanese Scenario

Wasco County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee Plan Maintenance Meeting Minutes

5.2. IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

They include earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, landslides, and other processes and occurrences. They are included in the broader concept of.

Page G Crow Wing County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2017

4.1 Hazard Identification: Natural Hazards

City of Manitou Springs

Bossier Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 10, 2016 Bossier City, LA

PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT 11/07/2016

Report to the Seventy-first Legislative Assembly on the Implementation of 1999 Senate Bill 12 Relating to Public Safety and Rapidly Moving Landslides

West Baton Rouge Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 9, 2015 Port Allen, LA

OREGON POPULATION FORECAST PROGRAM

Extreme Weather and Risks to Infrastructure. Heather Auld & Neil Comer Risk Sciences International

Assumption Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 1, 2015 Napoleonville, LA

Assessing Hazards and Risk

Timeframe. Crow Wing County, Baxter, Brainerd, Breezy Point, Crosby, Crosslake, Cuyuna, Deerwood, Emily, Fifty

GEO Geohazards Community of Practice

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

2014 Annual Mitigation Plan Review Meeting

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Chippewa County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan

APPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MAPS TO LAND-USE AND EMERGENCY PLANNING EXAMPLES FROM THE PORTLAND AREA

Scott County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update PDM FEMA Awarded

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Discovery Data Questionnaire

Community Discovery Data Questionnaire

City of Florence Hazard Mitigation Reference

Daily Operations Briefing. Saturday, March 17, :30 a.m. EDT

3.1: Identifying Hazards. Introduction

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

UDOT Weather Program Traffic Operations Center

Disaster Risk Assessment: Opportunities for GIS and data management with Open DRI

Landslide Hazard Assessment Methodologies in Romania

United States Multi-Hazard Early Warning System

Landslide Susceptibility Model of Tualatin Mountains, Portland Oregon. By Tim Cassese and Colby Lawrence December 10, 2015

Miami-Dade County Overview

Pre-Disaster Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Guilford, Connecticut History of Hazard Mitigation Planning Authority Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (ame

Lane County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan

REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING IN SOUTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT. Association of State Floodplain Managers Conference June 13, 2013 Hartford, CT

Randall W. Parkinson, Ph.D., P.G. Institute of Water and Environment Florida International University

THE NEW DNR LANDSLIDE HAZARDS PROGRAM

Jim Fox. copyright UNC Asheville's NEMAC

Washington State K 12 Facilities Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Final Mitigation Plan

Application #: TEXT

Cascadia megathrust earthquakes: reducing risk through science, engineering, and planning

COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 5-1. Risk Assessment and Hazard Mapping. CLUSTER 5: Hazard and Risk Information and Decision Making. Public Disclosure Authorized

USGS National Geospatial Program Understanding User Needs. Dick Vraga National Map Liaison for Federal Agencies July 2015

Hazard Vulnerability Analysis Union County

Summary of Available Datasets that are Relevant to Flood Risk Characterization

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Report of the Working Group 2 Data Sharing and Integration for Disaster Management *

MULTI-HAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DECISION MAKING

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

The Science and Policy of Natural Hazards

Daily Operations Briefing Monday, March 13, :30 a.m. EDT

CITY OF TUSCALOOSA ORGANIZATION OF 2015 FMP FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN

Climate Risk Visualization for Adaptation Planning and Emergency Response

Risk-based land use and spatial planning

Climate Resilience Decision Making Framework in the Caribbean. A case of Spatial Data Management

Progress Report. Flood Hazard Mapping in Thailand

KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RISK ASSESSMENT

Advisory Committee Meeting December 5, 2012

Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

Hurricane Readiness for Coastal Communities

Applying Hazard Maps to Urban Planning

NOAA S2S Planning. Dave DeWitt Fred Toepfer

A More Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment: Flood Damage in Virginia Beach

Running Head: HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN OUTLINE FOR MISSISSIPPI 1

City of Florence. Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Report for: Prepared by: City of Florence, Oregon And Dunes City, Oregon

STEUBEN COUNTY, NEW YORK. Hazard Analysis Report

Floods 2014 a wake up call to natural hazards

Daily Operations Briefing Monday, February 13, :30 a.m. EST

Southington. Challenges

A GEOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR DISASTER DECLARATIONS ACROSS THE LOWER 48 STATES

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

A Presentation By: Dr. G. M. Dar Centre for Disaster Management & Env. Studies, J&K IMPA, Srinagar

12/05/2016. The First step in Adaptation to future climate change Reduce Vulnerability and Exposure to present Climate Variability (IPCC 2014)

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

Sebastian County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update FMA FEMA Awarded

South Carolina Hazard Mitigation Plan

Initiative. Country Risk Profile: papua new guinea. Better Risk Information for Smarter Investments PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

New Service Provided by State Agency in Oregon: Base Flood Elevation Determinations

Statewide Topographic Mapping Program

Public Disclosure Copy

Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission #

AASHTO Extreme Weather Events Symposium Vermont s Road and Rivers - Managing for the Future

2010 Deschutes County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan

Transcription:

Oregon APA Legal Issues Workshop December 7, 2018 Tricia Sears, DLCD With information from Bill Burns, DOGAMI How this Topic Arrived WE FREQUENTLY HEAR CONCERNS ABOUT LIABILITY AND TAKINGS. Current federal or state law precedents for takings related to natural hazards? Relationship of takings, health and safety, and natural hazards? Key legal cases and codes that we should be aware of? Legal ramifications of adopting new hazard maps in developed and undeveloped areas? How can a jurisdiction legally use a new hazards map if it is not adopted? Is there a different liability in adopting or not adopting a hazard map? Is the jurisdiction liable for any property value decrease at any point in time? If so, how would that be quantified? What legal liability does a jurisdiction assume related to risk tolerance? Is there a legally defensible level of acceptable risk? 1 2 January 2012 winter storms with wind, rain, floods, and landslides DOGAMI site visits on January 26, 2018 DOGAMI memo to Benton County dated February 2, 2012 In 2012, this area was not mapped as a landslide hazard area DOGAMI will use LIDAR to map landslides in next 1 to 1.5 years Toured 5 sites, found 8 landslides Overall found 16 landslides from January 2012 storm Location of sites visited = circles landslide locations = green plus sign 3 4 Main landslide body is a rotational slide. Two small debris flows are below the main slide. This house was red tagged. Owners sued Benton County. They lost. 5 6 1

Niagara Drive Hoskins Summit Road Three small landslides along Niagara Drive Fill embankment landslide along Worden Circle 7 8 Landslide outlined in red. Pink areas are mapped landslides from SLIDO 2. SLIDO 2 was published in 2011 by DOGAMI. Yellow dashed outline is old large deep-seated landslide identified by DOGAMI using LIDAR in 2012. 9 10 Historic landslides = red dots Mapped landslides and fans = pink and orange polygons January 2012 landslides = green plus symbol 13,048 historic landslides (1932-2013) SLIDO 3.4 Total # landslides = 997 113 historic landslides 884 mapped landslides Info based on SLIDO 2. Map prepared by DOGAMI in 2012. 11 12 2

The Legislative Assembly declares that it is the policy of the State of Oregon that: Each property owner, each highway user and all federal, state and local governments share the responsibility for making sound decisions regarding activities that may affect landslide hazards and the associated risks of property damage or personal injury. Tricia Sears Natural Hazards Planner, DLCD 503 934 0031, tricia.sears@state.or.us Bill Burns, Engineering Geologist Natural Hazards Section Supervisor, DOGAMI 971 277 0062, bill.burns@oregon.gov (emphasis added) 13 14 3

Natural Hazards Planning in Oregon http://www.oregon.gov/lcd/haz/pages/index.aspx Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Natural hazards happen. Disasters occur when they impact people, property, and the environment. Oregon s Statewide Planning Goal 7, Areas Subject to Natural Hazards, directs local governments to adopt comprehensive plans to reduce risk to people and property from natural disasters. DLCD implements Goal 7 in part by maintaining and updating Oregon s Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan (NHMP) and assisting cities, counties, tribes, and special districts to draft, maintain, and update their own NHMPs. A natural hazard mitigation plan describes the hazards a community is most likely to face, identifies their potential impacts on people and property, and establishes a strategy to reduce those impacts. DLCD can assist with integrating NHMPs into other plans and programs, developing policies and regulations. Through collaboration with state and federal agencies, DLCD can provide access to data, information, and other resources. The 2015 Oregon Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan identifies eleven natural hazards in Oregon: Coastal Hazards Droughts Dust Storms Earthquakes Wildfires Floods Landslides Tsunamis Volcanic Eruptions Windstorms Winter Storms Your community may face some or all of these, or other natural hazards. Over time, climate change may influence the frequency and severity of some of these natural hazards. It may also cause your community to experience a natural hazard that has not occurred there before. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides grants for drafting and updating NHMPs. Among other criteria, communities whose NHMPs will expire soon receive priority for assistance from DLCD. Contact Tricia Sears (tricia.sears@state.or.us) or Marian Lahav (marian.lahav@state.or.us) for more information. Disasters occur as an interaction between natural systems, the built environment, and social systems. We can t predict when natural hazards will occur or the extent to which they will affect communities. However, with careful planning and collaboration it is possible to reduce the losses that can occur from natural hazards. Risk is an expression of the potential magnitude of a disaster s impact. A natural hazards risk assessment involves characterizing natural hazards, assessing vulnerabilities, and describing risk, either quantitatively, qualitatively, or both. A hazard characterization involves determining hazards causes and characteristics; documenting historic impacts; and identifying the future probability and intensity of occurrence. Assessing vulnerability involves inventorying the existing (or planned) property and populations exposed to a hazard, and then estimating how they will be affected by that hazard. Combining the hazard characterization with the vulnerability assessment provides an understanding of the risk of each hazard to a community, region, or the state as a whole. NHMP Info Sheet 1-23-18

Why engage in natural hazards mitigation planning? To avoid disasters by reducing or eliminating the long-term risk to human life, property, and the environment from natural hazards To maintain eligibility for federal pre- and post-disaster mitigation funding for planning and projects What are the basic NHMP requirements? Review and revise the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan to reflect: Changes in hazards and assets Progress in mitigation efforts Changes in priorities Submit to OEM for review and FEMA for approval every 5 years. What is in a Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan? Community Profile: Describe the community in terms of geography, land use, housing, economy, demography, transportation, and so forth. Risk Assessment: Characterize natural hazards. Identify assets. Assess vulnerabilities and potential losses. Analyze risk. Mitigation Strategy: Set hazard mitigation goals. Assess capabilities. Identify and prioritize actions to reduce risk. Plan Maintenance Process: Establish a system and schedule for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the Plan. Natural Hazards Mitigation Plans (NHMPs) FEMA-approved natural hazard mitigation plans, while voluntary, confer eligibility for hazard mitigation assistance through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM), and the Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA). The legal basis for natural hazard mitigation planning is found in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988 as amended by the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. The Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR Part 201.6) contains the requirements for developing local natural hazard mitigation plans and requires them to be updated every five years. Comprehensive Plan and NHMP Integration With hazard inventory information and risk analysis, goal setting, identification and prioritization of mitigation actions, NHMPs provide information for a city s or county s comprehensive plan. Integration of the NHMP with comprehensive plans, emergency operations plans, stormwater management manuals, and other governance documents helps ensure that hazard mitigation will be considered in decision-making processes and development projects, making communities safer and more resilient. Statewide Planning Goal 7 specifically states Local governments should coordinate their land use plans and decisions with emergency preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation programs. Recovery Mitigation and Prevention Phases of Emergency Management Preparedness DLCD will be working next with these counties and their cities to update their NHMPs. The work will be funded by a FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation grant. Jurisdiction NHMP Expiration Date Hood River County 12/16/17 Wasco County 1/15/18 Gilliam County 4/12/18 Harney County 6/7/18 Lake County 9/12/18 Sherman County 2/3/19 NHMP Info Sheet 1-23-18 Response Malheur County 5/2/19 Wheeler County 5/23/19