MRCSP- Michigan Basin Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Field Test

Similar documents
MRCSP Geologic Field Tests

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) Press Briefing. February 21, 2008

East Bend Test Site Core Team

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

Source Sink Pipeline

An Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: The Illinois Basin-Decatur Site

Developments in Storage and Monitoring for CCUS

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership

WESTCARB Regional Partnership

Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV)

Needs Assessment: Permitting, i Data Management, Operations

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

The Ketzin Test Site (former CO 2 Sink-project)

Colorado s Underground Injection Control Program: Prevention and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity

Geologic and Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

SECARB Phase III ANTHROPOGENIC TEST: Risk Management through Detailed Geologic Characterization and Modeling

Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan #1 Hancock County, Kentucky Geologic Review. J. Richard Bowersox David A. Williams Kentucky Geological Survey

Geologic Characterization of Stratigraphic Sequences in the Upper Ohio River Valley for Determination of Brine Storage Capacity

Wellbores. National Laboratory. Dolomite (BILD) at 1050 m depth. A Passive Seismic Monitoring (PSM) network was

Addressing Critical Issues in Geologic Storage Through Mountaineer and MRCSP Projects: Part 2 The Mountaineer Project

West Coast Research. WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission

Development of conceptual design for commercial-scale geologic storage and monitoring system at American Electric Power Mountaineer Plant

Exploration, Drilling & Production

Preliminary TOUGH2 Model of King Island CO 2 Injection. Modeling Approach

Reservoir Management Background OOIP, OGIP Determination and Production Forecast Tool Kit Recovery Factor ( R.F.) Tool Kit

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

The Illinois Basin Decatur Project Decatur, Illinois USA: Overview and Impacts. Sallie E. Greenberg

StackFRAC HD system outperforms cased hole in vertical wells

An Overview of Carbon Sequestration in Pennsylvania. John A. Harper Pennsylvania Geological Survey

Integration of Geophysical and Geomechanical

Modeling pressure response into a fractured zone of Precambrian basement to understand deep induced-earthquake hypocenters from shallow injection

Regulatory Considerations for Evaluating the Potential for Induced Seismicity of a Class I Non-Hazardous Disposal Well

Borehole Seismic Monitoring of Injected CO 2 at the Frio Site

COGCC Underground Injection Program & Induced Seismicity

WESTCARB Annual Meeting

Geology and Natural Resources

Recommendations for Injection and Storage Monitoring

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

Seismicity and the SWD-C4A well: An ongoing UIC case study in the Denver Basin, Colorado

The Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Storage in the Saline Arbuckle Aquifer on Water Quality in Freshwater Aquifers in Kansas

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

MIDDLE DEVONIAN PLAY MICHIGAN BASIN OF ONTARIO. Duncan Hamilton

Project Assessment and Evaluation of the Area of Review (AoR) at the Citronelle SECARB Phase III Site, Alabama USA

Horizontal Injectors & Producers at SACROC Clyde Findlay II & Jeremy Pitts

FRIO BRINE SEQUESTRATION PILOT IN THE TEXAS GULF COAST

WESTCARB Phase I Results Review

Virginia Walsh, PhD, P.G. Ed Rectenwald, P.G. April 5, 2016

Fundamentals Of Petroleum Engineering FORMATION EVALUATION

Carbon Sequestration in Basalts: Laboratory Studies and Field Demonstration

3D Time-lapse Seismic Modeling for CO2 Sequestration

Shale Development and Hydraulic Fracturing or Frac ing (Fracking) What is it?

(Brown & Loucks, 2009)

W. Lynn Watney and Saibal Bhattacharya. Kansas Geological Survey Lawrence, KS Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Annual Review Meeting

ADM CCS Projects Experience and Lessons Learned

The UK GeoEnergy Test Bed Ceri J Vincent British Geological Survey

Progress report for WY-CUSP: Characterization of the premier storage reservoirs and geological CO 2. storage site in Wyoming

Assessment of CO 2 Enhanced Gas Recovery in Shale Gas Reservoirs (Preliminary)*

Technology of Production from Shale

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Detailed CO2 Injection and Sequestration Monitoring Through Crosswell Imaging. Mark McCallum Z-Seis Corporation

Fr CO2 02 Fault Leakage Detection From Pressure Transient Analysis

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

What is the scope for carbon capture and storage in Northern Ireland. Michelle Bentham

Opportunities in Oil and Gas Fields Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Geology Commons

CO 2 Foam EOR Field Pilots

Petrophysical Data Acquisition Basics. Coring Operations Basics

RESERVOIR MODELING OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY PRODUCTION FROM STRATIGRAPHIC RESERVOIRS IN THE GREAT BASIN

Improving Well Performance through Multi Variate Completion Analyses in the US Bakken Shale. C. Mark Pearson

PART I Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy: History and Potential of the Newest and Largest Renewable Energy Resource

Halliburton Engineering for Success in Developing Shale Assets

The critical role of monitoring, verification, and accounting for geologic carbon dioxide storage projects

Current challenges at CO 2 Sites

Geologic CO 2 Storage Options for California

MUDLOGGING, CORING, AND CASED HOLE LOGGING BASICS COPYRIGHT. Coring Operations Basics. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

and a contribution from Offshore Europe

DEVONIAN OIL AND GAS PLAYS OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN

Atlantic Rim Coalbed Methane Play: The Newest SuccessfulCBM Play in the Rockies

Seismic mapping of the Utsira Formation. Petrophysical interpretations and fracture gradient estimates.

region includes nine states and four provinces, covering over 1.4 million square miles. The PCOR Partnership

SILURIAN REEF PLAY IN ONTARIO. Allan Phillips (Clinton-Medina Group)

DETERMINING WETTABILITY FROM IN SITU PRESSURE AND SATURATION MEASUREMENTS

Anatomy of a Coal Bed Fire

Minewater Management Annual Meeting Marion, Illinois. August 13, 2013

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

SCAL, Inc. Services & Capabilities

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

Basin-scale Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration in the Illinois Basin Status Report

PETROLEUM 101. Mark Shrimpton Jacques Whitford

OIL AND GAS PLAYS OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN, SOUTHERN ONTARIO. Terry Carter, Consulting Geologist London, Ontario

Cranfield Phase III Modeling

6. THE BOREHOLE ENVIRONMENT. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Overburden Pressures

Schlumberger Carbon Services Performance and Risk Approach to CO2 Storage Integrity

Introduction to Oil and Gas Production

Prepared For: NRAP Stakeholders Meeting February 4 and 5 th, Prepared By: George Koperna, VP ADVANCED RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Site Characterization for Carbon Dioxide Geologic Storage. Battelle s Founding Mission

Time-lapse well logging to monitor injected CO 2 in an aquifer at Nagaoka

Considerations for Infill Well Development in Low Permeability Reservoirs

Transcription:

MRCSP- Michigan Basin Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Field Test EPA Region 5 Regional Carbon Sequestration Meeting March 21-22, 2007, Pokagon State Park, Indiana Michigan Basin- Otsego County Test Site Project Team Abed Houssari and Becky Cook Dave Barnes and Bill Harrison Dave Ball, Neeraj Gupta, Phil Jagucki, Joel Sminchak, Danielle Meggyesy, Judith Bradbury, Bob Janosy, Jackie Gerst, Diana Bacon Charlie Byrer Robert Mannes and Joe Herpst Additional Contributions by Numerous Other MRCSP Team Members 1

Presentation Objectives Site Description Background Geological Assessment Test Well Drilling Site characterization results Permitting Injection, MMV Plans Site Description- Otsego County Test Site The location is at Core Energy gas fields in the vicinity of a DTE gas processing plant outside of Gaylord, Michigan 2

Michigan Basin- Otsego County Test Site Charlton 30/31 field, S. Dover/N. Chester Township, Otsego County, Michigan Site Diagram 3

CO 2 Source CO 2 available from DTE Turtle Lake gas processing plant Antrim Shale gas contains 5-30% CO 2 and is removed in amine based separation process Relatively pure CO 2 (99%) stream CO 2 dried and compressed at Core Energy Chester 10 facility CO 2 periodically used for EOR floods in Niagaran Reef oil fields Michigan Basin- Otsego County Test Site Antrim gas fields, currently 10th most prolific gas play in continental U.S. 8-mile long CO2 pipeline in place for EOR 4

Maps of Target Formations Michigan Basin- Otsego County Test Site 5

Test Well Drilling Test well drilled October 30 November 22 Wireline Logging Elemental Capture Spectroscopy Platform Express LithoDensity/Caliper Compensated Neutron/GR Dipole Sonic Imager Compressional/Shear Stonely/Cross-Dipole Resistivity Log Array laterolog Formation Microimager Dual Caliper DRAFT 6

Core Tests 180 ft of full 3-inch core 25 rotary sidewall core plugs. Core Tests 3000 Permeability (md) Porosity (md) 3000 3100 3100 Amherstburg Depth (ft) 3200 3300 DRAFT Bois Blanc 3200 3300 Depth (ft) 3400 3400 3500 Bass Islands Dolomite 3500 Bass Islands Evaporite 3600 3600 1E-4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Permeability (md) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Porosity 7

Core Examination- Injection Target Interpretation Injection Target = Upper Bass Islands Dolomite Total Storage Interval = Upper Bass Islands-Bois Blanc Confining Layer = Amherstburg 8

Geology Prognosis Sedimentary rocks ~9,500 ft deep and overlie Precambrian bedrock. Primary targets Bass Islands Dolomite-Bois Blanc. Containment layers: Amherstburg-Lucas formations Michigan Basin- Otsego County Test Site 9

Permitting Track State-Charlton 4-30 well drilled on Oil and Gas Well permit with Michigan DEQ. Class V UIC injection permit being prepared for Region 5 EPA Permitting- Area of Review 10

USDWs Glacial drift is deepest USDW Glacial drift 665 deep in State-Charlton 4-30 well. No water wells within ¼-mile. Wells in are generally less than 250 ft deep. Brine geochemistry of Paleozoic rocks in MI show TDS>100,000 mg/l. Major organic shale gas play between sequestration target and USDS. Injection System Design CO 2 injection testing and monitoring- The overall plan for the Otsego County site is to inject a volume of 3,000 to 10,000 tons of CO 2 generated from nearby Antrim gas processing plant. If the larger volume is injected (10,000 tons) we hope to evaluate monitoring of the injected CO 2 with 4-D seismic and/or cross-well seismic. We are in the process of retrofitting a closed well at the site for monitoring. This site may offer the opportunity to optimize CO 2 injection operations. 11

Injection Fluid 99.91% CO 2 Trace CH4, C2, C3 Supercritical DRAFT Preliminary Well Design Bridge plug in Bass Is. Evap. Perforated 3442-3515. Nickle-plated packer. 2 7/8-inch injection tubing. Dense brine interannulus fluid. Charlton 30/31 Field State Charlton #4-30 Permit No. 57916 Otsego County S30 T31N R1W Injection Test Configuration 16" Driven - 72 Ft. 11 3/4" 47# - 804Ft. - 475 Sx to Surf. 2 7/8" J-55 Seamless Tbg Retreivable Packer (Nickel Plated) 10 Sx Sand CIBP @ ± 3450 Ft. 5 1/2" Liner Lap @ ± 3538 Ft. 5 1/2" RBP @ 3600 Ft. 8 5/8" 32# Seamless J-55 Csg @ 3604' - 930 Sx DRAFT 5-1/2" 2250' 15.5# Seamless J-55-274 Sx Perfs 5482' - 5486' 7 7/8" hole TD 5800' 12

Plugging and Abandonment Plan Squeeze job across injection interval. Recomplete for EOR in Niagaran reef. Charlton 30/31 Field State Charlton #4-30 Permit No. 57916 Otsego County S30 T31N R1W Wellbore After Plugging Cut & cap 8 5/8" and 11 3/4" w/1/2" steel plate 16" Driven - 72 Ft. 20 sx cmt @surface 100 sx cmt plug 11 3/4" 47# - 804Ft. - 475 Sx to Surf. 176' fillup 8 5/8" cement retainer w/100 sx cmt below and 50 sx cement on top DRAFT 5 1/2" Liner Lap @ ± 3538 Ft. 8 5/8" 32# Seamless J-55 Csg @ 3604' - 9 5-1/2" 2250' 15.5# Seamless J-55-274 Sx 5 1/2:" cement retainer w/50 sx cmt below and 50 sx on top Perfs 5462'-5486' 7 7/8" hole TD 5800' MMV Monitoring options were reviewed and a subset of options was selected based on the proposed injection system specifications and geologic setting. Complete monitoring plan and schedule will be determined after site characterization efforts are finished. Site has potential for seismic monitoring (X-well or 3D seismic) Michigan Basin Time (Months) -6-4 -2 0 2 4 6 2 4 6 Phase Pre-demo Active Injection Post-Injection Injection System (PVT) X X X X Health and Safety (O 2) X X X X Wireline (CMR, Nuetron/RST, PEX) X X X X X-well Sesimic (3-4 Mon. Wells) X X Reservoir Sampling (MDT) X X Well Indicator sensors (PT) X X X X X X X X 4-D Seismic (with WMU program) X X DRAFT 13

3950 3900 3850 3800 3750 3700 3650 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time (Days) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 10 20 90 Ca 30 40 80 50 60 70 70 80 60 90 Na 50 10 20 40 30 40 30 50 60 20 70 80 10 90 K MMV Pressure (PSI) System Monitoring Temperature (*F) Michigan Basin Otsego County Site Gas Processing Plant Injection Test Well Antrim Gas Well Depth (ft bgs) 0 CO 2 Pipeline Niagara EOR Wells Surface CO 2 Survey 1,000 Brine Chemistry 2,000 Cross-well or 3D Seismic Monitoring Well 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 DRAFT Target Storage Formation Wireline 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 STOMPCO2 Reservoir Simulations Parameter Saturated Intrinsic Permeability Porosity Formation Thickness Rock Type Injection Rate Simulation Time Depth to bottom of formation Hydrostatic Gradient Salt Mass Fraction Temperature Coordinate System Radial Grid spacing Vertical Grid Spacing Upper and Lower Boundary Conditions Boundary Condition at R Boundary Condition at R Value 100 md 15% 100, 200, 300, 400 ft Homogeneous, isotropic Sandstone 200 metric tons/day for 2 months 1 year 3600 ft 0.433 psi/ft 0.1 90ºF 2 dimensional cylindrical 67 nodes 100 to 400 nodes no flow 0 3342 ft Comments Based on mini-permeameter scan of upper Bass Islands Based on wireline logs through upper Bass Islands Total of 4 runs Total injection of 12,000 metric tons CO2 (more than planned to include safety factor) Assumes 100,000 ppm Based on geothermal gradient Radial model variable from 0.26 ft to 206 ft uniform 1 ft spacing Axis of Symmetry Hydrostatic Gradient = 0.433 psi/ft 14

STOMPCO2 Reservoir Simulations Preliminary STOMPCO2 Reservoir Simulation Results for gas saturation, aqueous Co2, and gas pressure at times steps of 30 days, 60 days, and 365 days. Gas Saturation Aqueous CO2 30 d 60 d 365 d STOMPCO2 Reservoir Simulations Stochastic Simulations Multiple Injectors Carbonate Reservoirs Water, CO2, Salt 15

Timeline and Next Steps for the Michigan Basin Otsego County Test Site Permitting (in progress) Complete Monitoring Well (in progress) Injection testing and monitoring (Summer 2007) Post injection and closure 16