Make Your Cubesat Overnight and Put it in Any Orbit (Well almost)

Similar documents
Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

SOLAR ROCKET PROPULSION Ground and Space Technology Demonstration. Dr. Michael Holmes, AFRL/PRSS

BUILDING LOW-COST NANO-SATELLITES: THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROPER ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS CAMPAIGN. Jose Sergio Almeida INPE (Brazil)

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

Spacecraft Structures

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

BravoSat: Optimizing the Delta-V Capability of a CubeSat Mission. with Novel Plasma Propulsion Technology ISSC 2013

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

Boom-Membrane Integrated Deployable Structures for De-orbiting Satellites and Future Applications

Figure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

Case Studies for Uncertainty Quantification of a High-fidelity Spacecraft Oriented Break-up Tool. Bent Fritsche, HTG Stijn Lemmens, ESA

SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES

Spacecraft Environment Interaction Engineering

11.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

COUNTING DOWN TO THE LAUNCH OF POPACS

Small Satellite Aerocapture for Increased Mass Delivered to Venus and Beyond

Mission Design Options for Solar-C Plan-A

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation to Spacecraft Mechanical Interface Control Document

Rapid De-Orbit of LEO Space Vehicles Using Towed Rigidizable Inflatable Structure (TRIS) Technology: Concept and Feasibility Assessment

Thermal Coatings for In-vacuum Radiation Cooling LIGO-T C R. Abbott, S. Waldman, Caltech 12 March, 2007

DARE Mission and Spacecraft Overview

DRAFT. Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter 431-ICD Date: September 15, 2005

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide APPENDIX F. Proton Launch System Options and Enhancements

RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,

Small Satellite Aerocapture for Increased Mass Delivered to Venus and Beyond

AIR BEARING ADCS TEST BED. Daniel E. Wukelic College of Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

DRAFT. Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Predicting Long-Term Telemetry Behavior for Lunar Orbiting, Deep Space, Planetary and Earth Orbiting Satellites

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. & L Garde Inc.

Spacer Development and Analysis

SELENE TRANSLUNAR TRAJECTORY AND LUNAR ORBIT INJECTION

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

Sub-millimeter size debris monitoring system with IDEA OSG 1

LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?

Canadian Advanced Nanospace experiment 2 Orbit Operations:

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

Science planning and operations for Mars Express

MIKE HAWES VICE PRESIDENT & ORION PROGRAM MANAGER

Exploring the Mysteries of the Cosmos on the MOST Microsatellite Mission

Introduction to Satellite Orbits

RECENT SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE F.ALBY

Circular vs. Elliptical Orbits for Persistent Communications

MISSION ENGINEERING SPACECRAFT DESIGN

ENAE 483/788D FINAL EXAMINATION FALL, 2015

Flight Demonstration of Electrostatic Thruster Under Micro-Gravity

Final Examination 2015

Technical Proposal: Self-Assembling Space Structures

CFD Analysis of a Passive Deorbit Device

Solar Thermal Propulsion

COUNTING DOWN TO THE LAUNCH OF POPACS (POLAR ORBITING PASSIVE ATMOSPHERIC CALIBRATION SPHERES)

Capturing Asteroidal Material. Brian Wilcox 7 Feb 2012

An Architecture of Modular Spacecraft with Integrated Structural Electrodynamic Propulsion (ISEP)

DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, IIT MADRAS M.Tech. Curriculum

PROBA 1. F. Teston ESA/ESTEC D/TEC-EL

FORMOSAT-3 Satellite Thermal Control Design and Analysis *

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

What s Up in Space? Dean W McCall, Ed.D.

DE-ORBITATION STUDIES AND OPERATIONS FOR SPIRALE GTO SATELLITES

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix E. Section E: Starshades Subsection E.6: Starshade Spacecraft Lead Author: Amy Lo

mission status & ISRU related activity in Japan

STRUCTURAL MODELS AND MECHANICAL TESTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUNICATIONS SPACECRAFT

A Passive De-orbiting Strategy for High Altitude CubeSat Missions using a Deployable Reflective Balloon

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

Paper Session III-B - Mars Global Surveyor: Cruising to Mars

Electrospray Propulsion Systems for Small Satellites

Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman

A Comparison of Low Cost Transfer Orbits from GEO to LLO for a Lunar CubeSat Mission

FORMATION FLYING WITH SHEPHERD SATELLITES NIAC Fellows Meeting Michael LaPointe Ohio Aerospace Institute

Development of Microwave Engine

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

Satellite Components & Systems. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Nuclear Science & Technology Engineer (M.Sc)

Reduction of Trapped Energetic Particle Fluxes in Earth and Jupiter Radiation Belts

LAUNCH SYSTEMS. Col. John Keesee. 5 September 2003

Low-Thrust Trajectories to the Moon

Integrated Test Facility for Nanosat Assessment and Verification

Section 8: Getting Things into Space: Rockets and Launch Requirements

TESTIMONY BEFORE. HOUSE CO1MfITTEE ON SCIENCE AND ASTRONAUTICS SUBCOWITTEE ON SPACE SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS. Dr. John W.

Low Thrust Mission Trajectories to Near Earth Asteroids

Advancing the Utility of Small Satellites with the Development of a Hybrid Electric-Laser Propulsion (HELP) System

Andrea Sainati, Anupam Parihar, Stephen Kwan Seklam 31 A Very Low Altitude Constellation For Earth Observation

Mission Overview. EAGLE: Study Goals. EAGLE: Science Goals. Mission Architecture Overview

Pico-Satellite Orbit Control by Vacuum Arc Thrusters as Enabling Technology for Formations of Small Satellites

BepiColombo. Project and MPO Status. Comprehensive Explora1on of Planet Mercury

Lunar Flashlight Project

LOW EARTH ORBIT CONSTELLATION DESIGN USING THE EARTH-MOON L1 POINT

Electric Propulsion System using a Helicon Plasma Thruster (2015-b/IEPC-415)

Part I. Two Force-ometers : The Spring Scale and The Force Probe

Propellant Loading Effects on Ferroelectric Plasma Thruster Performance and Possible Applications

COUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES

NASA Future Magnetospheric Missions. J. Slavin & T. Moore Laboratory for Solar & Space Physics NASA GSFC

Design and Development of an Unrestricted Satellite Motion Simulator

IAC-16.A Jason A. Reiter a *, David B. Spencer b

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

Transcription:

Make Your Cubesat Overnight and Put it in Any Orbit (Well almost) Jim White, Walter Holemans, Planetary Systems Inc. Dr. Adam Huang, University of Arkansas

RAMPART Summary

Main Components

The Promise of Cubesats Do very cool experiments, very inexpensively, in short time windows To fulfill that promise we need to Get them built quickly and inexpensively Faster and cheaper Be in orbit long enough to do something useful Match orbit life to mission life However Often take nearly as long to build as microsats Often get very low orbits with a short life and are stuck in that orbit (more so more recently)

Developments That Move the Promise Forward Two developments are changing the game 3D printing for production The ability to make mechanical pieces by creating a CAD drawing, feeding it into a machine, and have a part a few hours later Capable propulsion Simple, safe, effective warm gas propulsion with enough capability to change the orbit in useful ways

3D Printing for Flight- Real Results RAMPART Cubesat out of printed parts (SLS Windform XT) Solar panel Card Cage Propulsion unit Antenna

The Current Design

Printed Material and Method Used on Rampart Solar panels, card cage, battery and propulsion unit Printing Process: Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) by CRP Material: Windform XT Nylon with Carbon microfibers http://www.windform.it/sito/en/w indform-xt-2-0-polyamidebased-material-carbonfilled.html Surface Finish: Nickel Plate, 0.001 thick, best commercial practices Meets Outgassing Requirements TML [%] <1.0%, CVCM [%] <0.10 CRP Technologies

Manufacturing Current State Printing 6 weeks, could have been 1 week Plating 3 weeks, could have been 1 week Note: Printed parts and plating donated on RAMPART» Our schedule was not a priority Estimated total cost to print and plate a 2U satellite ~$3,000

Precision of Printed Parts (SLS Windform XT) Printed parts have errors about 5 times greater than machined parts Machined part typically has an error less than 0.005 inches on an 8.0 inch feature size Greatest error on solar panels was 0.023 inches on an 8.49 inch feature size Example: Printed Solar Panel Inspection Feature Size [inch] Serial Number A B C D E Mass [g] 1 2.994 8.468 0.140 3.206 0.073 23.8 2 2.992 8.476 0.140 3.215 0.073 23.6 3 2.987 8.472 0.140 3.209 0.073 24.0 4 2.990 8.469 0.140 3.206 0.073 24.0 5 2.996 8.476 0.140 3.211 0.073 23.9 6 2.997 8.476 0.140 3.212 0.073 23.8 7 2.993 8.467 0.140 3.210 0.071 23.5 8 2.996 8.474 0.140 3.216 0.073 24.0 Mean 2.993 8.472 0.140 3.211 0.073 23.8 Max 2.997 8.476 0.140 3.216 0.073 24.0 Min 2.987 8.467 0.140 3.206 0.071 23.5 3 x Standard deviation 0.010 0.011 0.000 0.011 0.002 0.573 Should be 2.986 8.490 0.147 3.200 0.073 23.6 Greatest error 0.011 0.023 0.007 0.016 0.002 0.4 Mean Error [%] 0.239-0.209-4.762 0.332-0.342 0.953 3 x Stdev error [%] 0.341 0.135 0.000 0.347 2.906 2.426 Greatest error [%] 0.368 0.271 4.762 0.500 2.740 1.695

Advantage of SLS Windform XT Made quickly and cheaply Unlike machined parts: Quantity of unique features does not influence cost Designers need not consider how machining is completed or features created» Printed parts are to mechanical engineers what printed wiring boards are to electrical» Features can be inexpensively added Card Cage incorporates many features in one part Load Cell Hysteresis rods Six cards Five Antennas Solar cell experiment Snap in solar panel and covers Wire guides

Disadvantages of Current Printing Methods Printed parts have dimensional errors about 5 times greater than machined parts SLS Resolution limits makes features smaller than 0.03 inches difficult to achieve Threading cannot be printed-in Tapped threads are tight leading to high running torque on fasteners Nickel plating is rough like 280 grit sandpaper Mechanisms made from printed parts (deployable solar panels) require sanding, filing or a tuning feature Integral mechanism are possible to avoid this issue. Printed Plastic is weaker than metal and has much higher Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) Aspect ratios D/d > 30 can warp by 100% of d Ribs are needed to decrease aspect ratio

Mission Assurance and Printed Parts Thermal vacuum Pressure: <10-5 torr Temperature: -34 to +70 C Cycles: 27 Solar array deployment after 27th cycle at temperature extreme Random vibration 14.1 Grms, 3 minutes/axis Solar array deployment after excitation Load cell to monitor the strain of a preloaded cylinder on orbit Thermal cycling, and radiation may cause degradation of material properties and creep May be compared to terrestrial measurements Preloaded cylinder of printed material Aluminum load cell Turn hex to compress load cell and preload cylinder

Development Advantages Short build cycles allowed rapid change and integration of new ideas Three different solar panel release system tested Nov 2009 Aug 2010 Feb 2010

Future Performance More features to accommodate wiring harness Receive assembly-ready parts two weeks after order Complete mechanical assembly in 1 day

Second Enabler - Propulsion RAMPART warm gas printed propulsion Construction 3D printed performance Orbit change capability In plane maneuvers Out of plan maneuvers

RAMPART Propulsion System Rule of Thumb Every 100km Holmann transfer at LEO requires Dimension: 10cm x 10cm x 11.35cm (4.47 ) 50 60m/s V Empty Weight: 450 grams Fueled Weight: 1100 grams (with R 134a propellant) Nominal Propellant Volume: 500 cm 2 Design Mission V: 300m/s Design Performance: 90s Isp, 0.5N 30 second pulse duration

RAMPART Propulsion System Passive Heating (via Surface Coating) Active Heating Zone

Printed/Non-Printed Parts Red: Printed Windform XT Propellant Tank

350 RAMPART Delta-V V Performance DeltaV Available 300 DeltaV available [m/s] 250 200 150 100 RAMPART total mass = 2 kg 50 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Propellant mass [kg]

RAMPART Drag Make-Up (Propellant Life) 10-1 DeltaV Requirement 10 3 DeltaV required per orbit [m/s] 10-2 10-3 10-4 10 2 10 1 10 0 DeltaV required per year [m/s] 10-5 10-15 10-14 10-13 10-12 Total atmospheric density [kg/m 3 ] RAMPART with maximum frontal cross section (panels deployed; 1.35kg; CD=2.5) 10-1

RAMPART Drag Make-Up (Delta-V V Available) 10 4 Propellant Life versus Atmospheric Density 10 3 Propellant Life [yr] 10 2 10 1 10 0 Propellant=0.05kg Propellant=0.65kg =0.05k g 10-1 10-15 10-14 10-13 10-12 Total atmospheric density [kg/m 3 ] RAMPART total weight with propellant=2.0kg

0.7 In-Plane Orbit Peformance Hohmann Transfer 0.6 Delta-V(km/s) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 RAMPART Limit At V=350m/s 0.1 0 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 Starting Altitude Altitude (Km) RAMPART total weight with propellant=2.0kg

3 Out-of of-plane Performance 2.5 Inclination Angle Change (deg) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Delta V (Km/s) RAMPART Limit At V=350m/s RAMPART total weight with propellant=2.0kg, 450km circular orbit

Propulsion Capability Summary The hard part to machine the tank is dead easy with 3D printing The Windform XT material is at least 3X stronger than needed for this tank With this simple warm gas system, using about 1U, a 2U orbit can be Raised from 350 to (up to) 1000 circular Raised from 800 to (up to) 1500 circular Raised from 450 to (up to) 1200 elliptical, then the perigee lowered to reduce orbit life Change the plane up to 2.5 degrees to tune the orbit Lower apogee at any time to reduce orbit life (de-orbit on demand) Limitations Same tolerance limits as with the card cage» Must design the mounts for the end plate, valves, etc. to be tolerant of those dimension errors or do light post-printing machining

Status of that Promise Do very cool experiments, very inexpensively, in short time windows To fulfill that promise we need to Get them built quickly and inexpensively Make (Print) trial and test structures and mechanisms literally overnight out of plastic and similar materials Can do that over and over again for a few 10 s of dollars per print Can do the entire flight structure including complex internal parts in 2 weeks from drawings to completed pieces Final assembly in less than a week including deployed panels and similar features Include complex and multiple features at essentially no extra cost Include external plating for a conductive RF skin Can design to handle the tolerance issues Easily change things like putting pockets in side to mount other items and test overnight Start to finish in about 1 month now, perhaps 1 week in not too distant future

Status of that Promise Be in orbit long enough to do something useful Can move the typical low altitude cubesat orbit to anything up to about 1200 elliptical then reduce orbit life to a few weeks at end of mission Can move that same initial orbit up to about 800 circular and still reduce orbit life to < 20 years at end of mission Warm gas using R134-A is safe and should gain more and more acceptance Pressures are low, propellant volume is small, tank safety factors are large Prop tank structure very easily modified for things like Changing size Points to mount external items Change connection to remainder of spacecraft Accommodate integral antennas Scaled up for use on a 6U Made pretty much any other size or shape for other applications Can, with safe and cheap propulsion, be in orbit long enough to do useful work, and de-orbit or shorten life when done

Missions Made Possible What kinds of missions to these two capabilities enable Rapid response: Build and be ready for launch in a few weeks Long duration exposure to space environment Exposure to radiation effects (may be less expensive than a full set of rad tests on the ground) Wide area communications from higher orbit Spread within orbit plane from a single launch Station keeping Orbit maintenance in highly elliptical with low perigee for a close look but long orbit life Orbit maintenance in low orbit for longer durations Iterate a mechanical design, launch and test, iterate again Precise drag measurements with releasable spheres into an elliptical orbit then spread out in that orbit Rapid and cheap production of dozens (hundreds) of structures and mechanisms for swarms could even be modified for different capabilities Do a mission in one orbit, change the orbit and do a different mission

Wrap Up Questions