Structural Fire Design according to Eurocodes

Similar documents
Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

Introduction to Fire Design Theory Titular disciplina: Conf. dr. ing. Raul ZAHARIA

CEN/TC 250/SC 3 N 2633

SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFORMATIONS OF RC FRAMES DURING FIRE EXPOSURE

A fire resistance assessment case history G.C. and M.E. Giuliani

9-3. Structural response

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

DIF SEK. PART 5a WORKED EXAMPLES. DIFSEK Part 5a: Worked examples 0 / 62

Validation of the Advanced Calculation Model SAFIR Through DIN EN Procedure

WP7 GUIDELINE FOR GLOBAL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS USING NEW BEAM-COLUMN FINITE ELEMENT

PART 5-1: Compartment fire

Evaluation of Flexural Stiffness for RC Beams During Fire Events

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

PART 2 THERMAL RESPONSE. DIF SEK Part 2: Thermal Response 0/ 44

RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING STRUCTURES

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

A PARAMETRIC STUDY ON BUCKLING OF R/C COLUMNS EXPOSED TO FIRE

MODELING THE EFFECTIVE ELASTIC MODULUS OF RC BEAMS EXPOSED TO FIRE

Safety concept for structural fire design application and validation in steel and composite construction

TheEuropeanUnion EDICTOFGOVERNMENT±

OPTIMUM RELIABILITY OF A STEEL TAPERED PORTAL FRAME STRUCTURE EXPOSED TO FIRE

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

A NEW CURVE FOR TEMPERATURE-TIME RELATIONSHIP IN COMPARTMENT FIRE. Milan Đ. BLAGOJEVIĆ *, Dušica J. PEŠIĆ

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006

DESIGN OF CONCRETE COLUMNS BASED ON EC2 TABULATED DATA - A CRITICAL REVIEW

THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Fire Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with 2-D Plane Stress Concrete Model

Fire resistance assessment of Composite structures

EUROPEAN PRESTANDARD ENV PRÉNORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE VORNORM

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

AXIAL BUCKLING RESISTANCE OF PARTIALLY ENCASED COLUMNS

Assessing the Level of Safety for Performance Based and Prescriptive Structural Fire Design of Steel Structures

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

PART 5a : Worked examples Example to EN 1991 Part 1-2: Compartment fire

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES

Seismic design of bridges

Design issues of thermal induced effects and temperature dependent material properties in Abaqus

NATURAL FIRES IN LARGE SCALE COMPARTMENTS

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29

Probabilistic Study of the Resistance of a Simply-Supported Reinforced Concrete Slab According to Eurocode Parametric Fire

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Assignment 1 - actions

Risk analysis and reliability based design in tunnel fire safety

EUROCODE 6 Design of masonry structures

WP6 - Thought for Eurocodes Upgrade

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

Shear Behaviour of Fin Plates to Tubular Columns at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Structural behaviour of structures in fire


Recent Developments in the Area of Probabilistic Design of Timer Structures Köhler, J.; Sørensen, John Dalsgaard

FINAL DRAFT pren 1990

Seminar Worked examples on Bridge Design with Eurocodes

APPROXIMATE DESIGN OF SLENDER BI-AXIALLY LOADED RC COLUMNS

THERMAL ACTIONS. Milan Holický and Jana Marková. Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

DESIGN GUIDES FOR HIGH STRENGTH STRUCTURAL HOLLOW SECTIONS MANUFACTURED BY SSAB - FOR EN 1090 APPLICATIONS

RELIABLITY OF CURVED TIMBER BEAM EXPOSED TO FIRE

The temperature development of hot dip galvanized steel members in fire

Aluminium structures exposed to fire conditions an overview

Modeling of welded angle connections in fire

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes

A CONNECTION ELEMENT FOR MODELLING END-PLATE CONNECTIONS IN FIRE

Hamid Abbasi This paper develops a series of expressions to predict the apparent strength and

TORSIONAL EFFECTS AND REGULARITY CONDITIONS IN RC BUILDINGS

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES

Influence of the Plastic Hinges Non-Linear Behavior on Bridges Seismic Response

Thermal bridges in building construction Linear thermal transmittance Simplified methods and default values

STEEL JOINTS - COMPONENT METHOD APPLICATION

Probabilistic assessment of geotechnical objects by means of MONTE CARLO METHOD. Egidijus R. Vaidogas

Study of the influence of heat transfer of a CLT beam through FEM

EFFECT OF TRANSIENT THERMAL STRAIN ON THE BUCKLING OF SLENDER CONCRETE AND CONCRETE-FILLED COLUMNS IN FIRE

Seismic Design of New R.C. Structures

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

University of Sheffield The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E.

Behaviour of Continuous Beam to Column Connections in Post Earthquake Fire

Eurocod 3: Proiectarea structurilor de oţel Partea 4-3: Conducte Anexa Naţională

Calculation for Moment Capacity of Beam-to- Upright Connections of Steel Storage Pallet Racks

Validation of SAFIR through DIN EN NA

The effects of the accidental torsional eccentricity on the seismic behaviour of building structures

Joint resistance M j,rd Elastic limit 2/3 M j,rd

VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Design-support for MSH sections

Compression perpendicular to the grain

Multiple-Vehicle Fire Loads for Precast Concrete Parking Structures

Mathematical Modeling of Fire Dynamics

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Estimation of the Residual Stiffness of Fire-Damaged Concrete Members

Improving fire resistance of existing concrete slabs by concrete topping

Transactions on Engineering Sciences vol 5, 1994 WIT Press, ISSN

Research Collection. Numerical analysis on the fire behaviour of steel plate girders. Conference Paper. ETH Library

Eurocode 8 Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings

DESIGN OF END PLATE JOINTS SUBJECT TO MOMENT AND NORMAL FORCE

- Rectangular Beam Design -

COMPUTERISED CALCULATION OF FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS IN BOLTED END PLATE CONNECTIONS ACCORDING TO EUROCODE 3 1

NEW NUMERICAL MODELS FOR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL AND CONCRETE STRUCTURES EXPOSED TO FIRE

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Transcription:

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 Structural Fire Design according to Eurocodes Joël KRUPPA CTICM Coordinator CEN TC 250 / Horizontal Group "FIRE"

ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 2 SAFETY in CASE of FIRE concerning the construction work : Load bearing capacity of the construction can be assumed for a specific period of time The generation and spread of fire and smoke within the works are limited The spread of fire to neighbouring construction worksislimited The occupants can leave the works or be rescued by other means The safety of rescue teams is taken into consideration

HARMONISATION of ASSESSMENT METHODS Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 3 To prove compliance with Essential Requirements : Tests + extended applications of results calculation and/or design methods combination of tests and calculations

EUROCODES for STRUCTURAL FIRE DESIGN Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 4 Fire parts within : EC 1 : ACTIONS on STRUCTURES EC 2 : CONCRETE STRUCTURES EC 3 : STEEL STRUCTURES EC 4 : COMPOSITE STRUCTURES EC 5 : TIMBER STRUCTURES EC 6 : MASONRY EC 9 : ALUMINIUM ALLOYS STRUCTURES

First Group end of 80's Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 5 Under the leadership of M. Kersken-Bradley (G): J. C. Dotreppe (B- Concrete), C. Hahn (G Masonry) B. A. Haseltine (UK Masonry) L. Krampf (G Concrete) J. Kruppa (F Actions - Steel Composite) M. Law (F Steel) J. Mathez (F Concrete) E. Pedersen (DK Timber) P. Schaumann (G Composite) J. B. Schleich (L Steel Composite) G. Storti (F Timber) L. Twilt (F Actions - Steel Composite)

CEN TC 250 Sub-Committees involved in Fire Safety Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 6 TC 250 Structural Eurocodes SC 1 ACTIONS SC2 CONCRETE SC 3 STEEL SC4 COMPOSITE SC5 TIMBER SC6 MASONRY SC9 ALUMINIUM EC1- part 1.1 General actions EC2 - part 1.1 general rules EC3 - part 1.1 general rules EC4 - part 1.1 general rules EC5 - part 1.1 general rules EC6 - part 1.1 general rules EC9 - part 1.1 general rules part 1.2 actions in case of fire part 1.2 structural fire design part 1.2 structural fire design part 1.2 structural fire design part 1.2 structural fire design part 1.2 structural fire design part 1.2 structural fire design HORIZONTAL GROUP "FIRE"

NDP for Structural Fire Design Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 7 Selection thermal actions nominal fires parametric fire (simple fire models) advanced fire models Some coefficients for load combination Default value for reduction factor for the design load level in fire situation Use of advanced calculation models Some material properties Use of informative annexes on simple calculation methods

EC1 1.2 : Actions in case of fire Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 8 2.1 General (1) A structural fire design analysis should take into account the following steps as relevant : selection of the relevant design fire scenarios, determination of the corresponding design fires, calculation of temperature evolution within the structural members, calculation of the mechanical behaviour of the structure exposed to fire.

Various Steps for Assessments Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 9 1200 1000 Fire Development and propagation temperature ( C) 800 600 400 200 Structural schematisation or 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 or Heat Transfer to structural elements Time (min) Mechanical behaviour at elevated temperatures Vert. Disp. ΔV (mm) 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300-350 -400-450 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ΔV

EC1 1.2 : Actions in case of fire Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 10 2.2 Design fire scenario (1) To identify the accidental design situation, the relevant design fire scenarios and the associated design fires should be determined on the basis of a fire risk assessment. (2) For structures where particular risks of fire arise as a consequence of other accidental actions, this risk should be considered when determining the overall safety concept. (3) Time- and load-dependent structural behaviour prior to the accidental situation needs not be considered, unless (2) applies.

Real scale fires Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 11

EC1 1.2 : Actions in case of fire Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 12 2.3 Design fire (1) For each design fire scenario, a design fire, in a fire compartment, should be estimated according to section 3 of this Part. (2) The design fire should be applied only to one fire compartment of the building at a time, unless otherwise specified in the design fire scenario. (3) For structures, where the national authorities specify structural fire resistance requirements, it may be assumed that the relevant design fire is given by the standard fire, unless specified otherwise.

ISO fire versus "natural" fires Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 13 1200 Temperature [ C] 1000 800 600 400 200 0 ISO NAT - 1 NAT - 2 NAT - 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time [min]

EC1 1.2 : Actions in case of fire Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 14 2.4 Temperature Analysis (1)P When performing temperature analysis of a member, the position of the design fire in relation to the member shall be taken into account. (2) For external members, fire exposure through openings in facades and roofs should be considered. (3) For separating external walls fire exposure from inside (from the respective fire compartment) and alternatively from outside (from other fire compartments) should be considered when required.

EC1 1.2 : Actions in case of fire Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 15 2.4 Temperature Analysis (cont'd) (4) Depending on the design fire chosen in section 3, the following procedures should be used : with a nominal temperature-time curve, the temperature analysis of the structural members is made for a specified period of time, without any cooling phase; NOTE 1 The specified period of time may be given in the National Regulations or obtained from Annex F following the specifications of the National Annex. with a fire model, the temperature analysis of the structural members is made for the full duration of the fire, including the cooling phase. NOTE 2 Limited periods of fire resistance may be set in the National Annex.

EC1 1.2 : Actions in case of fire Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 16 2.5 Mechanical Analysis (1)P The mechanical analysis shall be performed for the same duration as used in the temperature analysis. (2) Verification of fire resistance should be in the time domain: t fi,d t fi,requ or in the strength domain: R fi,d,t E fi,d,t or in the temperature domain: Θ d Θ cr,d where t fi,d design value of the fire resistance t fi,requ required fire resistance time R fi,d,t design value of the resistance of the member in the fire situation at time t E fi,d,t design value of the relevant effects of actions in the fire situation at time t Θ d design value of material temperature Θ cr,d design value of the critical material temperature

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 17 EUROCODES 2 to 6 and 9 parts 1. 2

PARTS on STRUCTURAL FIRE DESIGN Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 18 The parts dealing with structural fire resistance in EC2 to EC6 & EC9 have the following layout: General (scope, definitions, symbols and units) Basic principles (performances requirements, design values of material properties and assessment methods) Material properties (strength and deformation and thermal properties) Assessment methods Constructional details (if any) Annexes (additional information)

Requirements Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 19 2.1.1 General (1)P Where mechanical resistance in the case of fire is required, concrete structures shall be designed and constructed in such a way that they maintain their load bearing function during the relevant fire exposure. (2)P Where compartmentation is required, the elements forming the boundaries of the fire compartment, including joints, shall be designed and constructed in such a way that they maintain their separating function during the relevant fire exposure. This shall ensure, where relevant, that: integrity failure does not occur, see EN 1991-1-2 insulation failure does not occur, see EN 1991-1-2 thermal radiation from the unexposed side is limited. Exemple from EC2-1.2

Requirements Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 20 2.1.1 General (cont'd) (3)P Deformation criteria shall be applied where the means of protection, or the design criteria for separating elements, require consideration of the deformation of the load bearing structure. (4) Consideration of the deformation of the load bearing structure is not necessary in the following cases, as relevant: the efficiency of the means of protection has been evaluated according to [ ], the separating elements have to fulfil requirements according to nominal fire exposure. Exemple from EC2-1.2

Requirements Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 21 2.1.3 Parametric fire exposure (2) For the verification of the separating function the following applies, assuming that the normal temperature is 20 C: the average temperature rise of the unexposed side of the construction should be limited to 140 K and the maximum temperature rise of the unexposed side should not exceed 180 K during the heating phase until the maximum gas temperature in the fire compartment is reached; the average temperature rise of the unexposed side of the construction should be limited to Δθ 1 and the maximum temperature rise of the unexposed side should not exceed Δθ 2 during the decay phase. Note: The values of Δθ 1 and Δθ 2 for use in a Country may be found in its National Annex. The recommended values are Δθ 1 = 200 K and Δθ 2 = 240 K. Exemple from EC2-1.2

Background for Δθ 1 = 200 K Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 22 1 1200 1100 1000 900 Standard fire Temperature [ C] 800 700 600 500 400 300 Unexposed side of the separating element Seperating element for I 30 : +210 K at 49 min. Separating element for I 120: +187 K at 181 min 200 100 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 Time [min] + 140 K 2 Experimentations carried out in the 80s ("Investigating the unexposed surface temperature criteria of standard ASTM E 119", by K. J. Schwartz and T.T. Lie, Fire technology, vol 21, N0 3, August 1985): - concluded the self-ignition temperatures of ordinary combustibles, in contact with unexposed surface of separating element are in excess of 520 F (271 C), - suggested to use 400 F (222 K) for average temperature rise and 450 F (250 K) for maximum temperature rise at any point

Material Properties Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 23 2.3 Design values of material properties (1)P Design values of mechanical (strength and deformation) material properties Xd,fi are defined as follows: X d,fi = k θ X k / γ M,fi X k k θ temperature γm,fi characteristic value of a strength or deformation property reduction factor for a strength or deformation property dependent on partial safety factor for the relevant material property, for the fire situation (2)P Design values of thermal material properties Xd,fi are defined as follows: X d,fi = X k,θ /γ M,fi or X d,fi = γ M,fi X k,θ X k,θ γ M,fi value of a material property in fire design partial safety factor for the relevant material property, for the fire situation. Note 1: The value of γ M,fi for use in a Country may be found in its National Annex. The recommended value is: γ M,fi = 1,0 Note 2: If the recommended values are modified, the tabulated data may require modification Exemple from EC2-1.2

Verification method : BASIC PRINCIPLE Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 24 Load-bearing function of a structure shall be assumed for the relevant duration of fire exposure t if : Ed,t, fi Rd,t, fi where : Ed,t, fi : design effect of actions (Eurocode 1 part 1.2) Rd,t, fi : design resistance of the structure at time t

Schematisation of the structure Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 25 Various possibilities for analysis of a structure global structural analysis analysis of parts of the structure member analysis (mainly when verifying standard fire resistance requirements)

Member Analysis Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 26 (1) The effect of actions should be determined for time t = 0 using combination factors ψ 1,1 or ψ 1,2 according to EN 1991-1- 2 Section 4. (2) As a simplification to (1) the effects of actions may be obtained from a structural analysis for normal temperature design as: E d,fi = η fi E d Where E d is the design value of the corresponding force or moment for normal temperature design, for a fundamental combination of actions (see EN 1990); η fi is the reduction factor for the design load level for the fire situation. η fi = Gk + ψ fiqk,1 γ Gk + γ Q G Q,1 k,1

η fi Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 27 η fi 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 Ψ fi,1 = 0,9 Ψ fi,1 = 0,7 Ψ fi,1 = 0,5 0,3 Ψ fi,1 = 0,2 0,2 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 assumptions: γ G, = 1,35 and γ Q,1 = 1,5. Note 2: As a simplification a recommended value of η fi = 0,7 may be used. 3,0 Q / G k,1 k Exemple from EC2-1.2

Member Analysis (cont'd) Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 28 (4)Only the effects of thermal deformations resulting from thermal gradients across the cross-section need be considered. The effects of axial or in-plane thermal expansions may be neglected. (5) The boundary conditions at supports and ends of member, applicable at time t = 0, are assumed to remain unchanged throughout the fire exposure. Exemple from EC2-1.2

Global structural analysis Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 29 (1)P When global structural analysis for the fire situation is carried out, the relevant failure mode in fire exposure, the temperature-dependent material properties and member stiffnesses, effects of thermal expansions and deformations (indirect fire actions) shall be taken into account.

Assessment methods Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 30 covering both thermal model and mechanical standard model fire dimensi Minimum dimensions [mm] tabulated data simple calculation models Δ θ a,t = λ d p A c p / V ρ p a a ( θ g,t - θ a,t) (1 + φ /3 ) resistance [min] on axis distanc e Possible combinations of a (average axis distance) and b min (width of beam) Web thickness R 30 b min 80 120 160 200 80 a 25 15 10 10 R 60 b min 120 160 200 300 100 a 40 35 30 25 R 90 b min 150 200 250 400 100 a 55 45 40 35 R 120 b min 200 240 300 500 120 a 65 55 50 45 R 180 b min 240 300 400 600 140 a 80 70 65 60 R 240 b min 280 250 500 500 160 a 90 80 75 70 Δ t - (e φ / 10-1) Δ θ g,t advanced calculation models HD

Data on fire protection systems Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 31 Membrane protection TS 13381-1 : horizontal membranes ENV 13381-2 : vertical membranes Fire protection to : ENV 13381-3 : concrete members ENV 13381-4 (& -8?) : steel members ENV 13381-5 : concrete/profiled steel sheet ENV 13381-6 : concrete filled hollow steel columns ENV 13381-7 : timber members (Developed by CEN TC 127)

Possible Design Procedures Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 32 Project Design Prescriptive Regulation (Thermal Actions given by a Nominal Fire) Performance-Based Code (Physically Based Thermal Actions) Temperature [ C] 1200 900 600 300 0 Standard time-temperature curve Hydrocarbon fire External fire 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 Time [min] Gas temperature [ C] 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 625 356 310 189 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 Time [min]

Possible Design Procedures (cont d) Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 33 Prescriptive Regulation (Thermal Actions given by a Nominal Fire) Temperature [ C] 1200 900 600 300 0 Standard time-temperature curve Hydrocarbon fire External fire 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 Time [min] Member analysis Analysis of part of the structure Analysis of the entire structure Mechanical actions at boundaries Mechanical actions at boundaries Selection of mechanical actions Tabulated data Simple calculation models Advanced calculation models

Possible Design Procedures (cont d) Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 34 Performance-Based Code Gas temperature [ C] 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 625 356 310 189 Fire development Model 0 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 Time [min] Member analysis Analysis of part of the structure Analysis of the entire structure Mechanical actions at boundaries Mechanical actions at boundaries Selection of mechanical actions Simple calculation models Advanced calculation models

ISO Concept vs FSE* Approach Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 35 Model fire model structural model heat transfert model mechanical model ISO concept (current approach) ISO-fire 1100 C @ 120min isolated elements uniform temperature over the whole surface mainly ultimate load bearing capacity FSE* Approach all design fires 300 C @120min 1300 C @ 20min And cooling phase (part of) structure with interaction between elements thermal gradient in 2, 3 directions ultimate and "deformation" limit states * : Fire Safety Engineering

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 36