Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update. Yauhen Kot XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting 5..8
Outline Overview about the main components and space margins Optics at the laser heater and diagnostics - FODO + parabola-like β at the heater - FODO + const β - Drift with parabola-like β - Phase advance between the OTRs in the drift solution - Beam sizes at the OTRs Estimations of the laser heater specifications - Formulas - Assumptions and requirements - Maximum energy modulation - Laser peak power for different configurations - Energy distribution after the interaction with the laser heater Summary
Injector Building Plan Injector is divided by reinforced concrete wall (Shielding) in two unequal parts: - left one is used for injection tuning - in the right one the beam is matched by means of Dogleg into the Linac Total length: 73,8m Total beam line length: 64,5m Length from left wall to dump: 4,8m
Point of Interest: from Gun to Dump Boundary conditions: The wall on the left Dump dipole on the right. All diagnostics have to be be placed there. Beamline length from Gun to Dump: 3,4m 9.3m spare place from the wall to gun foreseen now 9.3m Gun Module LH F O D O 1.5m
Laser Heater Integration: FODO + Parabola-like β at the Heater Gun Module LH Diagnostics Matching to Shielding Shielding F O D O 11. 6.71 Matching to FODO 6.5 1.95 8.75 Matching to DOG. 3.54 14.75.16 4.55 31. 3.96 4.9 44.96 - LH requires 6.71m - possible for a very wide range of the initial β-function - no influence on the phase advance between OTR monitors from the optics in the laser heater. - β-function is not constant along the LH - almost no spare place left for further improvements
Gun Laser Heater Integration: FODO + const β at the Heater Module LH Diagnostics Matching to Shielding Shielding F O D O 11. 6.71 Matching to FODO 6.5 1.95 8.75 Matching to DOG. 3.54 14.75.16 4.55 31. 3.96 4.9 44.96 - LH requires 6.71m - possible for a very wide range of the initial β-function - no influence on the phase advance between OTR monitors from the optics in the laser heater. - β-function is constant along the LH - the best conditions for operating the laser heater. - places with extremely flat beam unavoidable. - no spare place left for further improvements
Gun Laser Heater Integration: Drift with Parabola-like β Module LH Diagnostics Shielding Spare place Matching to DOG 11. 7.36.68 7.47 8.75. 3.54 15.45.81 5.49 3.96 4.9 44.96 - LH requires 7.36m - desired phase advance of 45 between OTRs for initial β-function between 3m and 65m achievable - additional 7.47m of spare place. - only OTR monitors are to be installed in the diagnostics section. no other stuff required. - β-function is not constant along the heater
Phase Advances between OTRs in the Drift Solution Phase advances between OTR monitors for different intial values of β-function initial beta 4 6 8 3 65 7 75 min beta 1.67 1.8.9.84.8.8.78.78 phase advances 4.5-9. - 4.5 44.6-36. - 44.6 44.6-39.6-44.6 45. - 4.8-45. 45. - 45. - 45. 45. - 45. - 45. 45.4-45.7-45.4 45. - 48.6-45. Desired phase advance of 45 is achievable in the range of the initial β-function between 3m and 65m Expected initial β-function: -7m regions -3m and 65-7m could be critical.
Expected beam sizes at the OTR monitors OTRs in the FODO solution OTRs 1&4 in the drift solution OTRs &3 in the drift solution Assumed emittance, mm mrad β, m Beam size range, μm β, m Beam size range, μm β, m Beam size range, μm 1.-1.5.435 98.9-11. 5.5 148.7-18.1.935 61.3-75.1 FODO solution provides the constant β-function at the OTR monitors, leading to the same beam size Drift solution: different betas at exterior and interior OTRs different beam sizes The smallest expected beam size at the OTR is about 61μm, still comfortable above the tolerance limit of the OTR monitor (1μm).
( ) () [ ] Δ Δ = Δ exp 1 sin exp,, x x L L r z k r ec I r z f σ πσ σ πσ ( ) ( ) ( ) + Δ Δ = Δ b exp 1 sin 1 sin exp l 1,, x x s L r L b r z k q z k e l z N r z f r σ πσ σ π πσ σ ( ) 1 1 4 4 + + Δ = K K J K K J KL P P u r L L σ GW e mc I P A 7 8. = transverse beam size σ r laser beam size rms Δ L energy modulation σ initial energy spread Main Formulas for the Estimation of the Laser Heater Specifications Distribution function after the interaction with the laser heater Laser peak power
Assumptions and Requirements for the Estimations Energy spread considerations: - Desired uncorrelated energy spread after the acceleration:.5mev rms. - BC1 and BC with the compression of x5=1 Uncorrelated energy spread after the laser heater should be below 5keV Laser Heater should provide the uncorrelated energy spread of the beam up to 5keV. Beam size at the laser heater: - Normalized beam emittance range: 1.-1.5mm mrad - Depends on the solution for the diagnostics section after the heater. - FODO solution: β function is constant along the laser heater and assumes the value of 1m. beam size rms: -46 μm - Drift solution: β function varies from 1 to 8m along the laser heater. beam size rms: from 18- μm to -7 μm Average beam size at the heater for the drift solution: σ x = εβ = s ε β + s β ε β Linear with s varies from to 45μm
Rms Heater-Induced Local Energy Spread Rms heater-induced local energy spread, kev 6 5 4 3 1 15 5 35 45 55 65 75 Max energy modulation, kev σ r σ r [μm] =σ r Expected range for the maximum energy modulation σ r laser rms transverse beam rms σ r =( ) max σ r =( ) min =( ) min =( ) max Rms heater-induced energy spread depends crucial on the ratio /σ r Transverse beam size varies by about % along the laser heater. If the energy spread of 5keV desired, the maximum energy modulation is expected to be in the range of 53.56-7.31keV. For =σ r the energy modulation of 6.86keV needed
Uncorrelated Energy Spread after the Interaction with the Laser Beam Maximum Energy Modulation: 6.86keV 4. ε=1. 1-6 m ε=1.5 1-6 m Laser peak power for different wave lengths, MW (undulator field.33t) λ, nm 57 8 154 λ u.383.476.543 Κ 1.18 1.47 1.67 peak power for σ r =μm (ε=1.mm mrad).99.66.5 peak power for σ r =45μm (ε=1.5mm mrad) 1.48.99.78 laser peak power, MW 3.5 3..5. 1.5 1..5 16 18 4 6 8 3 3 34 laser spot rms σ r, μm
Uncorrelated Energy Spread after the Interaction with the Laser Beam Maximum energy modulation: 53.56keV 4. ε=1. 1-6 m ε=1.5 1-6 m λ, nm Κ peak power for peak power for 57 8 Laser peak power for different wave lengths, MW (undulator field.33t) λ u.383.476 1.18 1.47 σ r =45μm (ε=1.mm mrad) 1.15.77 σ r =3μm (ε=1.5mm mrad) 1.7 1.15 Laser peak power, MW 3.5 3..5. 1.5 1..5 154.543 1.67.61.91 16 18 4 6 8 3 3 34 Laser spot rms σ r, μm
Uncorrelated Energy Spread after the Interaction with the Laser Beam Maximum energy modulation: 7.31keV ε=1. 1-6 m 4. ε=1.5 1-6 m Laser peak power for different wave lengths, MW (undulator field.33t) λ, nm Κ peak power for peak power for 57 8 154 λ u.383.476.543 1.18 1.47 1.67 σ r =164μm (ε=1.mm mrad).88.59.47 σ r =μm (ε=1.5mm mrad) 1.3.88.7 Laser peak power, MW 3.5 3..5. 1.5 1..5 16 18 4 6 8 3 3 34 Laser spot rms σ r, μm
Energy Distribution after the Interaction with the Laser Beam V[keV -1 ].4.3. σ r [μm] All distributions have the same energy spread, but different form σ r laser rms transverse beam rms.1-8 -6-4 - 4 6 8 Energy deviation, kev The ratio /σ r has impact on the final form of the energy distribution: Case one: σ r < sharp spike with long tails Case two: σ r = more or less gaussian distribution Case three: σ r > approx. like a water bug Case four: σ r >> double horn structure. Perfectly matched laser beam size or slightly above the electron beam rms provides the most convenient form of the energy distribution.
Summary Three different optics have been calculated for the implementation of the laser heater and the diagnostics. Optics with the drift solution for the diagnostics allows to save about 7m space. Constant phase advance between OTRs can be provided, however, only for a range of initial β 3-65m. Optics with the FODO solution for the diagnostics requires more place, but makes the phase advances beteewn OTRs independent from the intial β. Beam sizes at the OTRs are well above the tolerance limits of the monitors. Laser heater specifications have been calculated for the laser wave lengths of 57, 8 and 154 nm. Uncorrelated energy spread of the bunch after the interaction with the laser heater has been calculated for different ratios σ r /. Perfectly matched laser beam size or laser beam slightly larger than the electron beam provides the most preferable energy distribution.
6 σ r σ r [μm] rms heater-induced local energy spread, kev 5 4 3 1 =σ r 15 5 35 45 55 65 75 maximum energy modulation, kev Expected range for t maximum energy mo