Drilling 5 km to Boiling: The St1 Helsinki District-Heating Gamble

Similar documents
Hijiori HDR Reservoir Evaluation by Micro-Earthquake Observation

Estimating energy balance for hydraulic fracture stimulations: Lessons Learned from Basel

The San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth: Recent Site Characterization Studies and the 2.2-Km-Deep Pilot Hole

PART I Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy: History and Potential of the Newest and Largest Renewable Energy Resource

Characterization of Induced Seismicity in a Petroleum Reservoir: A Case Study

EXPERIENCE FROM THE FIRST THERMAL RESPONSE TEST (TRT) EQUIPMENT IN FINLAND. N. Leppäharju, I. Martinkauppi, M. Nousiainen

Topics: The Layers of the Earth and its Formation Sources of Heat Volcanos and Earthquakes Rock Cycle Rock Types Carbon Tax

Shale Development and Hydraulic Fracturing or Frac ing (Fracking) What is it?

Soft stimulation and induced seismicity

Key Stage 3 - Volcano Fracking

Geodynamics. Measuring stress and strain Lecture How is stress measured? Lecturer: David Whipp

SHALE GAS AND HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY EXPLORATION IN UGANDA, COUNTRY UPDATE 2006

Extending the magnitude range of seismic reservoir monitoring by Utilizing Hybrid Surface Downhole Seismic Networks

Hydraulic Characteristics of the Basel 1 Enhanced Geothermal System

Activity Submitted by Tim Schroeder, Bennington College,

What is an Earthquake?

Cornish Institute of Engineers Conference th October 2013

Heat (& Mass) Transfer. conceptual models of heat transfer. large scale controls on fluid movement. distribution of vapor-saturated conditions

HEAT TRANSFER IN A LOW ENTHALPY GEOTHERMAL WELL

Results of the Lacq pilot s monitoring Focus on microseismicity. Joëlle HY-BILLIOT 10 may - Venice

M035 High Resolution 3D Tunnel Seismic Reflection at Olkiluoto, Finland

Developments on Microseismic Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Large-scale CO 2 Storage

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Course Syllabus (Contents Part 8) Geothermal Energy

MEASUREMENT OF HYDRAULICALLY ACTIVATED SUBSURFACE FRACTURE SYSTEM IN GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR BY USING ACOUSTIC EMISSION MULTIPLET-CLUSTERING ANALYSIS

Human Causes of Earthquakes INTRODUCTION

Stress measurements a Scandinavian perspective. Jonny Sjöberg Itasca Consultants AB (Sweden)

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Geoelectric power generation prospects in Lithuania

Downhole Physical Properties Measurements Supporting Iron-oxide Deep Exploration and Mining in Blötberget, Sweden

Enhanced Geothermal Systems The Technical Challenge

Review of April 2016 Lawrence County Seismic Events

Interpretation of Microseismic Events of Large Magnitudes Collected at Cooper Basin, Australia and at Basel, Switzerland

In situ Geothermal Lab Groß Schönebeck

crustal structure experiment beneath Wairarapa - Wellington area: results from SAHKE

Is It Likely That Fracking the Organic-Rich Utica Shale Beneath Bowling Green, OH Would Be Environmentally Safe?

DETAILED IMAGE OF FRACTURES ACTIVATED BY A FLUID INJECTION IN A PRODUCING INDONESIAN GEOTHERMAL FIELD

Earthquakes and Seismic Waves Lesson 4 2

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth and Terrestrial Planets

Analysis of Microseismic Events from a Stimulation at Basel, Switzerland

Deep Exploration Technologies Coiled Tubing Drilling

STUDY GUIDE FOR MID-TERM EXAM KEY. Color, luster, cleavage, fracture, hardness, taste, smell, fluorescence, radioactivity, magnetism

Microseismic Aids In Fracturing Shale By Adam Baig, Sheri Bowman and Katie Jeziorski

3. Continental Heat Flow. Ge 163 4/3/15

Microseismic Monitoring Shale Gas Plays: Advances in the Understanding of Hydraulic Fracturing 20 MAR 16 HANNAH CHITTENDEN

Introduction to Formation Evaluation Abiodun Matthew Amao

What We Know (and don t know)

Sand Control Rock Failure

ES Ch 19 Earthquakes 1

Induced Seismic Monitoring: Insights from a Duvernay Case Study

Seismoelectric Ground-flow DC-4500 Locator

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

From Micro to Macro: Application of a Geomechanically Calibrated, Seismically Constrained Reservoir Model to Unconventional Resource Development

Coupling Crustal Seismicity to Crustal Permeability Power-Law Spatial Correlation for EGS-Induced and Hydrothermal Seismicity

Chapter 6. Conclusions. 6.1 Conclusions and perspectives

Seismic Sources. Seismic sources. Requirements; Principles; Onshore, offshore. Reading: Telford et al., Section 4.5 Sheriff and Geldart, Chapter 7

Drillworks. DecisionSpace Geomechanics DATA SHEET

UK data for geothermal resource assessments

Flow Lognormality and Spatial Correlation in Crustal Reservoirs I: Physical Character & Consequences for Geothermal Energy

Geology and Earth Resources

Determining SAFOD area microearthquake locations solely with the Pilot Hole seismic array data

Internal microseismic event pattern revealed by waveform cross-correlation analysis

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Challenges in Hydrothermal Spallation Drilling for Deep Heat Mining Projects

Science. Earth Science. New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Department: Course Title. Textbook(s): Focus on Earth Science

What s Shaking in the Barnett Shale? STEP Dallas, August 11, 2015

Earthquakes Modified

EGS Sistemi Geotermici Potenziati

Drilling a geothermal well into a deep sedimentary geothermal reservoir conclusions from case study Gross Schoenebeck

Lab-scale Investigation of a Multi Well Enhanced Geothermal Reservoir

Subsurface Geology and Resource Exploration

Rotary Drilling Rotary Drilling Bits

Seismicity induced by Shale Gas Hydraulic Stimulation: Preese Hall, Blackpool, United Kingdom.

High-resolution analysis of microseismicity related to hydraulic stimulations in the Berlín Geothermal Field, El Salvador

Borehole Seismic Monitoring of Injected CO 2 at the Frio Site

SEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting

Petrophysical Data Acquisition Basics. Coring Operations Basics

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

Induced seismicity in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in Alsace, France. Jean Schmittbuhl 1

5. What is an earthquake 6. Indicate the approximate radius of the earth, inner core, and outer core.

Fracture Communication in Carbonate Reservoirs Based on G&G and Production Data. E.N. Dulaeva (TatNIPIneft Institute)

Instructional Objectives

Upper crust structure under CTBTO station «Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky» by endogenic microseismic activity

ractical Geomechanics for Unconventional Resources

5. EARTHQUAKES AND EARTH S INTERIOR

MicroScope. Resistivity- and imagingwhile-drilling

RESEARCH PROPOSAL. Effects of scales and extracting methods on quantifying quality factor Q. Yi Shen

ractical Geomechanics for Oil & Gas Industry

Geophysical exploration methods at European sites

Risk Evaluation. Todd Shipman PhD, Alberta Geological Survey/Alberta Energy Regulator November 17 th,2017 Induced Seismicity Workshop, Yellowknife NWT

HDR PROJECT SOULTZ: HYDRAULIC AND SEISMIC OBSERVATIONS DURING STIMULATION OF THE 3 DEEP WELLS BY MASSIVE WATER INJECTIONS

and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Energy efficient use of geothermal energy sustainable use. Prof Dr. Uwe Tröger

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRBUTION OF LARGER SEISMIC EVENTS AT EUROPEAN AND AUSTRALIAN HDR SITES

An Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: The Illinois Basin-Decatur Site

URTeC: Abstract

FAQs - Earthquakes Induced by Fluid Injection

Joint Interpretation of Magnetotelluric and Seismic Models for Exploration of the Gross Schoenebeck Geothermal Site

Calpine Corporation. NW Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System Demonstration Project. Community Update Calpine Geysers Visitor Center Middletown, CA

Transcription:

SMU Power Plays Conf. 26 April 2016 Drilling 5 km to Boiling: The St1 Helsinki District-Heating Gamble PE Malin GFZ Seismomechanics Advanced Seismic Instrumentation and Research

Summary of geothermal from Kukkonen - Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000 Finland has Precambrian granitics covered with < 5 m of Quaternary sediments subdued topography so little advective groundwater circulation low rock porosity and water content heat flow in top 1 km ranges from < 15 to 69 mw m -2 geothermal gradient is typically 8-15 C km -1 at 1 km depth temperature ranges from 14 to 22ºC drilling to ~6 km is required to reach 100ºC. suggesting it is not a good candidate for wet or dry geothermal use.

Heat flow in southern Finland mw/m 2 Metropolitan Helsinki (about 1 m people)

Temperatures at 1 km in southern Finland 0 C Metropolitan Helsinki (about 1 m people)

However there is the and next come EU climate change regulations District Heat Plant Network - all fossil fuel fired More than 20 plants in metropolitan Helsinki

The Otaniemi District Heat Plant built circa 1949

A business and environmental challenge (!) Finland has over 350 District Heating networks A business and environmental opportunity (?) The retail price of District Heat is almost double of electricity

enter 2 players and 1 technology Mika Anttonen WATER DRIVEN WELL DRILLING FOR HARD ROCK Bo Nordell Luleå University of Technology SE-97187 Luleå, SWEDEN Phone: +46-920-91646 Fax. +46-920-91697 Kent Fjällström Norrfjärdens Brunnsborrningar AB SE-94591 Norrfjärden, SWEDEN Phone: +46-911-52080 Fax: +46-911-52098 Lars Öderyd Drilling Supervisor G-Drill AB c/o LKAB SE-98381 Malmberget, SWEDEN phone: +46-970-71000 fax: +46-970-23600 Rami Niemi A hammer driven by 2 concentric drill pipes

Vision and strategy Traditional oil business of St1 generates cash flow, enabling development of new CO 2 -aware energy solutions Employees working in oil business are strategy enablers Employees working in renewable energy are strategy executors 9 St1 values are based on Nordic society model 9.5.20 16 St1 Company presentation

Key Figures 2012 2014 St1 Group Oy Consolidated 2012 2013 2014 Turnover, M 5 037,3 4 136,2 4406,8 - Finland 17 % 0 % 0% - Sweden 83 % 100 % 100% 1 0 Operating profit, M 49,1 76,7 85,1 Profit before taxes, M 27,1 58,4 74,9 Net profit M 16,7 47,0 64,1 Equity, M 14,3 60,0 120,3 Balance sheet total, M 1 038,3 901,9 609,7 Personnel 345 312 297 5/9/2 016 Mika Anttonen St1 Company controls Presentation about 3/4 of this amount and he wrote the vision statement

In July 2015 a 2015 m well was fully cored logged in following fall and winter Temp Resistivity Heat production Accoustic velocities Two wellbore imaging methods stress tests of rock where made mini-frack tests used for in-situ stress Ilmo Kukkonen Georg Dresen

Well-logs are power law scaled S(k) 1/k β β ~ 1 1/km < k < 1/cm scale range (Eastern Finland)

10 6 Outokumpu = -1.3313 10 7 Outokumpu K = -1.1531 10 5 10 6 10 4 10 3 10 5 10 2 10 4 10 1 10 0 10 3 10-1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER 10 2 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER 10 13 Outokumpu = -1.1745 10 6 Outokumpu = -1.0069 10 5 10 12 10 4 10 11 10 3 10 10 10 2 10 9 10 1 10 8 10 7 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER 10 0 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER

10 9 Outokumpu U = -1.0969 10 9 Outokumpu Th = -1.1009 10 8 10 8 10 7 10 7 10 6 10 6 10 5 10 5 10 4 10 4 10 3 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER 10 9 Outokumpu 0-544 = -0.93398 10 3 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER 10 9 Outokumpu 1901-2518 = -0.99851 10 8 10 8 10 7 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 6 10 4 10 5 10 3 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER 10 4 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 WAVENUMBER

Well-flow is lognormal distributed κ exp(αφ) 20 < α < 50 Reservoir scale Fennoscandia

Frack model geometry an O&G analog for EGS stimulation* - time constant τ s - time constant τ r *Carslaw & Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, Oxford University Press 1959, 1.14, p33.

Summary/Conclusions for hydrofracking of heterogeneous fractured rock Heterogeneity of porosperm precludes normal-statistics stimulation Maximum radius of standard stimulation may be no more than 20m Peclet number γ ~ 5 may be limit of feasible stimulation Q ~ 1 MW in 1 km-long well gives γ ~ 5 for fracture poro ϕ ~ 10%. Volume V of fluid producing Q ~ 1MW heat energy is V ~ 2L/s. (EGS power provision requires at minimum γ ~ 50)

A hard lesson in hard-rock EGS Induced Earthquakes and Geothermal in Downtown Basel, Switzerland Hot/Dry Rock well Basel from space

What happened? December 2006 Number of event per hour: 200 100 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 1 every 20 s Water Pressure bars 300 200 Detected 100 Located 4 Legal Limit = 3.4 0 Magnitude 2 0 4 3 Legal Limit = 3.4 Magnitude 2 1 0 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F December 2006 February 2008

Borehole Station st1 Otaniemi Heat Mine 3-C borehole seismic net This diagram shows the design principles for the network and calibration shots. The design criteria are: 1. 3-C borehole seismometers to record both P & S for epicenter and depth control. 2. Progressive station radial distances to 1.5 times 5 km target depth for epicentral (horizontal) location control. 3. Progressive 0.2 to 0.5 km station location tolerance. 4. Triangular inner, mid, and outer ring station configuration covers azimuthal gaps. 5. Stations st01, st10 & st11 can be eliminated without significantly effecting events in NW epicenter locations. Calibration shot

Downhole 3-C 4.5 Hz seismograph for 350 m borehole Sivi Kivivirta st1 - Campus of University of Helsinki

Network station at Lassilla Heat Plant Sergio Valenzuela ASIR Patrick Vassa st1

25 Level, 1920 m Otaniemi Pilot Hole DS150 Vertical Seismic Array - Drill Bit Seismic 80m long 24 x 80 m interconnects 1920 m bottom DS150 5 m max Max depth 1930 m due constriction in well diameter

25 Level array installation - 60 m crane

st1 EGS microearthquake monitoring and crust structure imaging system. Reciprocal shot points and receivers: 10 shots into 10 stations and 25 level VSP = 4 ton caisson hammer drill to 40 m 144 mm hammer drill to 5000 m Alternate explosive source point MAP VIEW OF STRAIGHT LINE PATHS Buried net station Shot point 2 km 24 Level Array 5 km

Trying to look ahead Seismic imaging using 10 shot points from MEQ net work site to PH array 14 o 24 km/s V apparent 70 o 6.3 km/s V apparent

Drill Bit Seismic imaging using MH air hammer drilling into MEQ net work

As of Friday, 22 April -